DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Slyne-With-Hest, Lancaster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION – SLYNE-WITH-HEST PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL SLYNE-WITH-HEST, LANCASTER Provided for: Lancaster City Council Date: February 2016 Provided by: The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Clarence Arcade Stamford Street Ashton-under-Lyne Tameside OL6 7PT Tel: 0161 342 4409 LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST QUALITY ASSURANCE Author Suzanne Waymont CIEEM Checked By Stephen Atkins Approved By Derek Richardson Version 1.0 Draft for Comment Reference LSA - 4 The survey was carried out in accordance with the Phase 1 habitat assessment methods (JNCC 2010) and Guidelines for Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (CIEEM 2013). All works associated with this report have been undertaken in accordance with the Code of Professional Conduct for the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. (www.cieem.org.uk) LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SURVEY BRIEF 1.2 SITE LOCATION & PROPOSAL 1.3 PERSONNEL 2 LEGISLATION AND POLICY 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 DESK STUDY 3.2 FIELD SURVEY 3.3 SURVEY LIMITATIONS 4 BASELINE ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS 4.1 DESKTOP SEARCH 4.2 SURVEY RESULTS 5 ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS – IMPLICATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 6 CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX 1 – DATA SEARCH RESULTS APPENDIX 2 – DESIGNATED SITES APPENDIX 3 – BIOLOGICAL HERITAGE SITES LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST SUMMARY • A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal was commissioned by Lancaster City Council to identify possible ecological constraints that could affect the development of 8 sites and areas currently being considered as new site allocations under its Local Plan. This report looks at one of these sites: Slyne-with-Hest. • An ecological data search was undertaken of records held by the Local Record Centre for Lancashire, LERN, together with additional sources such as the Magic website. • An Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey of the site was undertaken on 14th January 2016 by two members of the Greater Manchester Ecology Unit. An assessment was also made of the potential of the site to support protected and priority species. • The proposed site allocation lies within 2km of Morecambe Bay SPA/SAC/Ramsar Site/SSSI. The site also lies within the SSSI Impact Risk Zone for Thwaite House Moss. There are 8 Biological Heritage Sites within 2km. • A HRA will be required for this proposed allocation. • The proposed site allocation largely supports agriculturally improved grassland and arable fields of limited ecological value. However the boundary features and adjacent habitats have ecological value. Further habitat surveys are required to fully assess this interest. • The proposed site allocation also has the potential to support protected species including bats, water vole, great crested newt and breeding birds. Additional surveys will also be required for these species before any detailed planning proposals can be brought forward. LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST 1 INTRODUCTION The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit (GMEU) was commissioned by Lancaster City Council in November 2015 to identify possible ecological constraints that could affect the development of 8 sites and areas currently being considered as new site allocations under its Local Plan. This report looks at one of these sites: Slyne-with-Hest. 1.1 SURVEY BRIEF The work commission involved: • Desktop surveys for any existing ecological information relating to the sites and areas, particularly concerning the presence of specially protected sites or species. • A ‘walkover’ site survey and appraisal. • The preparation of Reports for each site appraising the ecological value of the sites and advising of any possible ecological constraints that may apply to future developments. The Reports will include: plans showing any areas of potential nature conservation importance; a description of the survey techniques employed and their limitations (if any); the findings of the desktop and site surveys; an appraisal of the nature conservation value of the study areas; recommendations for further ecological surveys that would be required in support of any future planning applications for the sites and areas 1.2 SITE LOCATION & PROPOSAL The township of Slyne-with-Hest is located three miles north of Lancaster and three miles east of Morecambe. As part of its Local Plan, Lancaster City Council is proposing a number of strategic sites to meet the need for jobs and housing. The current proposal delivers residential development including the provision for 500 new homes. It is important to note that the site is illustrative of potential growth in the Slyne / Hest Bank area and the scale of development will be informed by the outcomes of the Green Belt Review. Figure1 shows the area of land under consideration. The land identified at Slyne-with-Hest is primarily farmland (Figure 2) and is surrounded on three sides by residential development with open countryside to the east. 1.3 PERSONNEL All survey work was conducted by Suzanne Waymont MCIEEM Senior Ecologist and Mandy Elford MCIEEM, Ecologist (NE Bat License holder) with the Greater Manchester Ecology Unit. This report was written by Suzanne Waymont. LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST Figure 1 – SLYNE-WITH-HEST STRATEGIC SITE ©Crown Copyright. All Rights Reserved. Tameside MBC Licence No LA100022697, 2016 LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST Figure 2 – Aerial View of Slyne-with-Hest LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST 2 LEGISLATION AND POLICY The following UK legislation may be relevant to the proposed site allocations: • The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) • The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) • The Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act (2006) • Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000 • Protection of Badgers Act 1992 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2012 acts as guidance for local planning authorities and decision-takers, both in drawing up plans and making decisions about planning applications. 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Desk Study The Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) collaborative database website (http://magic.defra.gov.uk/MagicMap.aspx) was searched for information on key environmental schemes and statutory designations in January 2016. An Ecological Data search was undertaken from the Local Record Centre covering Lancaster LERN. Information on all protected and priority species within 2km of the site allocations together with the citations for any BHS sites was requested. The information returned from LERN only includes data that they are at liberty to distribute. Therefore the North Lancashire Bat Group and the Lancashire Badger Group were also contacted for data. The results of these studies is found in Section 4 3.2 Field Survey The main survey of the site was undertaken using an extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey methodology. This survey method records habitat distributions, assesses the potential of the site to support protected and priority species and records flora and fauna present at the time of survey. However no detailed surveys for species were undertaken. Invasive non-native plant species stands, as listed under Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended, were also noted. The Bat Surveys for Professional Ecologists: Good Practice Guidelines (3rd edn) (Bat Conservation Trust 2016) were used to assessed the quality of the habitats present on site for bats. The survey was undertaken on the 14th January 2015 by Suzanne Waymont MCIEEM Senior Ecologist and Mandy Elford MCIEEM, Ecologist (NE Bat License holder) with the Greater Manchester Ecology Unit. The weather conditions at the time of survey were cold and sunny. 3.3 Survey limitations The timing of the survey in January is outside of the ideal time to undertake full ecological surveys. Many invasive, non-native plant species die back over winter, although their remains are often visible. Many of the hedgerows had been recently cut. As a result the number of species in some and their species richness may have been underestimated. LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST However the nature of the survey was to provide an initial appraisal of the ecological value of the site, advise on any possible ecological constraints and to provide recommendations for any further ecological surveys that would be required. The limitations listed above did not therefore limit the primary purpose of the survey; areas that supported habitats of potential interest, and features that could be used by protected species requiring further survey could be identified. The data search from LERN includes only data that they are at liberty to distribute. The absence of biological records for an area in no way implies that taxa are not present. 4 BASE LINE ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS 4.1 DESKTOP SEARCH The desktop search results are shown in Appendix 1. Designated Sites and Areas The proposed site allocation lies within 2km of Morecambe Bay Special Protection Area for birds (SPA), Special Area for Conservation (SAC) and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Morecambe Bay is also designated as a Ramsar Site (see Map 1). The citations for these designations can be found in Appendix 2 The SPA supports numerous coastal and marine habitats that support internationally important assemblages of breeding sea birds and wintering
Recommended publications
  • MORECAMBE & HEYSHAM There Are 16 Primary and 2 Secondary

    MORECAMBE & HEYSHAM There Are 16 Primary and 2 Secondary

    Lancashire County Council Children & Young People’s Public Health Commissioning—Child Health Profiles 2017 Public Health, assisted by Business Intelligence within Lancashire County Council have created 34 middle level (MSOA* cluster) Child Health Profiles (CHPs). This is because the CHPs on the Public Health England website are only at upper tier level. This does not show the outcome data at sub-district level but just an overview of children and young people’s health across the whole of County. These lower level profiles highlight where children’s health needs are the greatest and opportunities to reduce inequalities are greatest. MORECAMBE & HEYSHAM There are 16 primary and 2 secondary schools with 6th forms in Morecambe & Heysham. There are 2 special schools, 2 independent schools and 1 further education col- lege. There are 6 GP practices. Child health outcomes are quite poor in Morecambe and Heysham with 4 indicators ranked 3rd highest of the 34 CHPs (where 34 = best) covering Lancashire. These are the % of young people not in education employment or train- ing, the % of maternities to mums aged <20 years, the num- ber of children aged 5-17 on a child protection plan and the number of looked after children aged 0-4. It also has the 4th highest number of looked after children aged 5-17. 22% of children here are living in poverty (10th). Educational attainment in quite low with 46% of 10/11 year olds passing key stage 2 education and 48% of 15/16 year olds passing key stage 4. 64% of 4/5 year olds achieve a good level of development at the end of reception (7th).
  • Engagement to Date Presentation

    Engagement to Date Presentation

    Engagement to Date Presentation Morecambe Bay CCG Aims and Objectives This presentation will highlight the engagement activities carried out on behalf of Morecambe Bay CCG. Summer 2018 continued We continue to support the Carnforth Community Choir which is a community led initiative where people use singing to improve their physical, mental and emotional health. The Choir was set up by a member of the community, following a series of public events organised by Morecambe Bay CCG. The group has gone from strength to strength and recently put on a sell out concert raising £800 for the local Samaritans. Summer 2018 continued • Members of Morecambe Bay CCG continue to attend the South Lakeland Health and Wellbeing Forum which includes members from organisations in the public sector, county council, schools and third sector organisations – in order to encourage partnership working and share knowledge and resources across the area. • The July meeting included an extended discussion about the NHS Integrated Care Communities and the County Councils’ Community Wellbeing Groups; looking at how we can work better together and have a more joined up approach. Summer 2018 continued • Following a long period of high temperatures, members of the team at Morecambe Bay CCG produced and shared a press release advising the public on how to stay safe in the heat this summer. Read the full article: https://bit.ly/2lS2RMY Morecambe Bay CCG supported the Cumbria Police domestic abuse awareness campaign which ran throughout the World Cup. The campaign involved sharing the message of ‘Love the Game, Love your Family’ which underlines that no matter what the result, football should never lead a person subjecting loved ones to abuse or violence.
  • Moths of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

    Moths of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

    MOTHS OF UMATILLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: Results from 10 sites Sampled May 22-23, 2017 Dana Ross 1005 NW 30th Street Corvallis, OR 97330 (541) 758-3006 [email protected] SUMMARY Macro-moths were sampled from the Umatilla National Wildlife Refuge for a third time 22-23 May, 2017 as part of an ongoing pollinator inventory. Blacklight traps were deployed for a single night at ten sites representative of major plant communities in the McCormack and Paterson Units. A grand total of 331 specimens and 36 moth species were sampled. Of those, 17 species (47%) were documented from the refuge for the first time. In a somewhat larger geographical context, 21 species were recorded for the first (8), second (7) or third (6) time from Morrow County, Oregon while 4 species were documented for the first (1) or second (3) time from Benton County, Washington. INTRODUCTION National Wildlife Refuges protect important habitats for many plant and animal species. Refuge inventories have frequently included plants, birds and mammals, but insects - arguably the most abundant and species-rich group in any terrestrial habitat - have largely been ignored. Small size, high species richness and a lack of identification resources have all likely contributed to their being overlooked. Certain groups such as moths, however, can be easily and inexpensively sampled using light traps and can be identified by regional moth taxonomists. Once identified, many moth species can be tied to known larval hostplant species at a given site, placing both insect and plant within a larger ecological context. Moths along with butterflies belong to the insect Order Lepidoptera.
  • North West Inshore and Offshore Marine Plan Areas

    North West Inshore and Offshore Marine Plan Areas

    Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Marshall Paul Macrae 1.0 Paul Macrae Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris MMO Comments Graham, David Hutchinson 2.0 Paul Macrae Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Independent QA Sweeting © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
  • Peat Database Results Lancashire

    Peat Database Results Lancashire

    Bare, Lancashire Record ID 236 Authors Year Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R., 1998 Ellison, R., Evans, D. and Riley, N. Location description Deposit location SD 443 649 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Peat layer (often <1 m thick, hard, consolidated, dry, laminated deposit). Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Boreholes SD46 SW/52-54 Depth of deposit 14C ages available -10 m OD No Notes Bibliographic reference Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R., Ellison, R., Evans, D. and Riley, N. 1998 'Geology of the country around Lancaster', Memoir for 1:50,000 geological sheet 59 (England and Wales), . Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 31 Bare, Lancashire Record ID 237 Authors Year Crofton, A. 1876 Location description Deposit location SD 445 651 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Peat horizon resting on blue organic clay. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available No Notes Crofton (1876) referred to in Brandon et al (1998). Possibly same layer as mentioned by Reade (1904). Bibliographic reference Crofton, A. 1876 'Drift, peat etc. of Heysman [Heysham], Morecambe Bay', Transactions of the Manchester Geological Society, 14, 152-154. Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 2 of 31 Carnforth coastal area, Lancashire Record ID 245 Authors Year Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R., 1998 Ellison, R., Evans, D. and Riley, N. Location description Deposit location SD 4879 6987 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Coastal peat up to 4.9 m thick. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Borehole SD 46 NE/1 Depth of deposit 14C ages available Varying from near-surface to at-surface.
  • The Seaside Resorts of Westmorland and Lancashire North of the Sands in the Nineteenth Century

    The Seaside Resorts of Westmorland and Lancashire North of the Sands in the Nineteenth Century

    THE SEASIDE RESORTS OF WESTMORLAND AND LANCASHIRE NORTH OF THE SANDS IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BY ALAN HARRIS, M.A., PH.D. READ 19 APRIL 1962 HIS paper is concerned with the development of a group of Tseaside resorts situated along the northern and north-eastern sides of Morecambe Bay. Grange-over-Sands, with a population in 1961 of 3,117, is the largest member of the group. The others are villages, whose relatively small resident population is augmented by visitors during the summer months. Although several of these villages have grown considerably in recent years, none has yet attained a population of more than approxi­ mately 1,600. Walney Island is, of course, exceptional. Since the suburbs of Barrow invaded the island, its population has risen to almost 10,000. Though small, the resorts have an interesting history. All were affected, though not to the same extent, by the construction of railways after 1846, and in all of them the legacy of the nineteenth century is still very much in evidence. There are, however, some visible remains and much documentary evidence of an older phase of resort development, which preceded by several decades the construction of the local railways. This earlier phase was important in a number of ways. It initiated changes in what were then small communities of farmers, wood-workers and fishermen, and by the early years of the nineteenth century old cottages and farmsteads were already being modified to cater for the needs of summer visitors. During the early phase of development a handful of old villages and hamlets became known to a select few.
  • SCHEMES for the RECLAMATION of LAND from the SEA in NORTH LANCASHIRE DURING the EIGHTEENTH and NINETEENTH CENTURIES Read 20 Febr

    SCHEMES for the RECLAMATION of LAND from the SEA in NORTH LANCASHIRE DURING the EIGHTEENTH and NINETEENTH CENTURIES Read 20 Febr

    SCHEMES FOR THE RECLAMATION OF LAND FROM THE SEA IN NORTH LANCASHIRE DURING THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES BY WILLIAM ROLLINSON, M.A. Read 20 February 1964 OME of the earliest schemes for the reclamation of land S from the sea in North Lancashire were implemented by the monks of Furness Abbey in the thirteenth century. In the fervour of Cistercian colonisation and agricultural reclamation, several areas on Walney Island were reclaimed by the construction of embankments or dykes of beach pebbles. There is some evidence to suggest that several of these dykes were constructed on both the west and east coasts of the island, but only the great Biggar Dyke on the east coast remains today, the west coast embank­ ments having been destroyed by marine erosion. Extending for almost a mile north-west of the village of Biggar, the dyke protected part of the east coast of Walney and prevented inundation of low-lying ground during spring tides. During the medieval period it was maintained and repaired by the monastic tenants in Furness, but after the dissolution of the abbey in 1537 the responsibility was assumed by the Crown, and in 1564 by the inhabitants of Walney. In spite of such an early and promising beginning, the progress of land reclamation and agricultural development was retarded after the dissolution, and it was not until the eighteenth century and the period of the Agricultural Revolution that interest was again aroused. Under the stimulus of a rapidly growing urban market and a rise in the price of grain during the Napoleonic wars, the period between the mid-eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries was one of agricultural expansion and improvement.
  • Research Techniques in Animal Ecology

    Research Techniques in Animal Ecology

    Research Techniques in Animal Ecology Methods and Cases in Conservation Science Mary C. Pearl, Editor Methods and Cases in Conservation Science Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Land Clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon Thomas K. Rudel and Bruce Horowitz Bison: Mating and Conservation in Small Populations Joel Berger and Carol Cunningham, Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation Jonathan D. Ballou, Michael Gilpin, and Thomas J. Foose, Conserving Wildlife: International Education and Communication Approaches Susan K. Jacobson Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Management: A First Time User’s Guide David S. Wilkie and John T. Finn At the End of the Rainbow? Gold, Land, and People in the Brazilian Amazon Gordon MacMillan Perspectives in Biological Diversity Series Conserving Natural Value Holmes Rolston III Series Editor, Mary C. Pearl Series Advisers, Christine Padoch and Douglas Daly Research Techniques in Animal Ecology Controversies and Consequences Luigi Boitani and Todd K. Fuller Editors C COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW YORK Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 2000 by Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Research techniques in animal ecology : controversies and consequences / Luigi Boitani and Todd K. Fuller, editors. p. cm. — (Methods and cases in conservation science) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0–231–11340–4 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0–231–11341–2 (paper : alk. paper) 1. Animal ecology—Research—Methodology. I. Boitani, Luigi. II. Fuller, T. K. III. Series. QH541.2.R47 2000 591.7′07′2—dc21 99–052230 ϱ Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper.
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge

    Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge

    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
  • North West England and North Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2

    North West England and North Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2

    North West England and North Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 North West & North Wales Coastal Group North West England and North Wales Shoreline Management Plan SMP2 Main SMP2 Document North West England and North Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Approved by 14 th September 1 0 1st Working Draft – for PMB Review A Parsons 2009 1st October 1 1 Consultation Draft A Parsons 2009 2 0 Draft Final 9th July 2010 A Parsons Minor edits for QRG comments of 3 rd 9th September 2 1 A Parsons August 2010 2010 Minor amendment in Section 2.6 and 12 th November 2 2 A Parsons Table 3 2010 18 th February 3 0 Final A Parsons 2011 Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Blackpool Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2011 North West England and North Wales Shoreline Management Plan 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................2 1.1 NORTH WEST ENGLAND AND NORTH WALES SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 ......................................... 2 1.2 THE ROLE OF THE NORTH WEST ENGLAND AND NORTH WALES SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2......... 3 1.3 THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 ................................................................................. 5 1.4 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 REPORT STRUCTURE .......................................................................................
  • Forest of Bowland AONB Access Land

    Forest of Bowland AONB Access Land

    Much of the new Access Land in Access Land will be the Forest of Bowland AONB is identified with an Access within its Special Protection Area Land symbol, and may be accessed by any bridge, stile, gate, stairs, steps, stepping stone, or other (SPA). works for crossing water, or any gap in a boundary. Such access points will have This European designation recognises the importance of the area’s upland heather signage and interpretation to guide you. moorland and blanket bog as habitats for upland birds. The moors are home to many threatened species of bird, including Merlin, Golden Plover, Curlew, Ring If you intend to explore new Parts of the Forest of Bowland Ouzel and the rare Hen Harrier, the symbol of the AONB. Area of Outstanding Natural access land on foot, it is important that you plan ahead. Beauty (AONB) are now For the most up to date information and what local restrictions may accessible for recreation on foot be in place, visit www.countrysideaccess.gov.uk or call the Open Access Helpline on 0845 100 3298 for the first time to avoid disappointment. Once out and about, always follow local signs because the Countryside & Rights of Way Act (CRoW) 2000 gives people new and advice. rights to walk on areas of open country and registered common land. Access may be excluded or restricted during Heather moorland is Many people exceptional weather or ground conditions Access Land in the for the purpose of fire prevention or to avoid danger to the public. Forest of Bowland itself a rare habitat depend on - 75% of all the upland heather moorland in the the Access AONB offers some of world and 15% of the global resource of blanket bog are to be found in Britain.
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And

    Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And

    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.