Les Peuples Des Forêts Tropicales Aujourd'hui
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Publié par: APFT - ULB, Centre d’Anthropologie Culturelle Avenue Jeanne 44 - 1000 Bruxelles Tél. 32-2-650 34 25 E-mail : [email protected] Extracts may be freely reproduced by the press or non-profit organisations, with acknowledgement. APFT would appreciate receiving copies of any material based on this book. Des ext r aits de cet ouvrage peuvent être librement repr oduits par la presse ou par des organ i s at i o n s sans but lucratif, en indiquant la source. APFT souhaiterait recevoir copie de tout matériel ayant fait usage des textes ou figures contenus dans le présent document. This study was achieved with the financial contribution of the European Commission. The authors are solely responsible for all opinions expressed in this document, which do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. Cette étude a été réalisée avec l’aide financière de la Commission Européenne. Les auteurs sont seuls responsables des opinions exprimées dans ce document. Elles ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles de la Commission Européenne. Layout & Production : C+C Folon s.a. - Chaussée d’Alsemberg 247 - 1190 Bruxelles. Tél. 32-2-340.67.77 - E-mail : [email protected] TROPICAL RAINFOREST PEOPLES TODAY Volume V PACIFIC REGION Melanesia Christin KOCHER SCHMID and Roy ELLEN Scientific Editors Future of The Rainforest People Program Brussels - 2000 Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 2 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) Table of contents Volume 5 - PACIFIC I. OVERVIEW 5 II. PAPUA NEW GUINEA 29 Sites of Intensi ve Interdisciplinary Research (SSIR) Sites Intensifs Pluridisciplinaires (SIP) • Pio-Tura / Pawaia 31 • Vanimo-Kilimeri 57 Sites of Complementary Long-term Research Sites de Recherche Complémentaire de Longue durée • Ikundi / Ankave 87 • Musala / Kasua 123 • Nokopo / Yopno 141 • Trangap / Oksapmin 153 III. VANUATU 165 Sites of Intensi ve Interdisciplinary Research (SSIR) Sites Intensifs Pluridisciplinaires (SIP) • Santo / Vanuatu 167 Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 3 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 4 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) I OVERVIEW Christin KOCHER SCHMID Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 5 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) SUMMARY The research of the NRI (National Research Institute)-FRP team followed the outline set out in a questionnaire for the IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development) Country Study on Papua New Guinea, "Policy that Works for Forest and People". It contains a detailed set of research questions on issues of land use and forest management in rural communities (see appendix 1). This questionnaire was prepared by Colin Filer (NRI), Nikhil Sekhran (PNG Conservation and Resource Centre), Brian Brunton (Greenpeace), and Basil Peutalo (WWF-PNG). It was answered by expatriate social scientists working predominantly in rural areas throughout Papua New Guinea and by national university students. By incorporating these questions into our methodology, the results of NRI-FRP research can be compared to these existing data (Sillitoe, Filer n.d.). For the purpose of this report, the questionnaire has been slightly modified and was also answered by most other APFT/FRP researchers working in Melanesia. This introductory summary to our research follows, therefore, the structure of the IIED questionnaire, some detailed data are placed in tables (appendix 2) but commented upon in the text. Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 6 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) INTRODUCTION TO MELANESIA Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu belong geographically and culturally to Melanesia. In all three countries the same lingua franca, Neo-melanesian, in different mutually understandable variations is used: Pidgin in Papua New Guinea, Pijin in the Solomon Islands, Bislama in Vanuatu. APFT is active in three Melanesian countries of the Southwest Pacific: Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands. These three Pacific nations exhibit many similarities: they are part of the Melanesian island chain stretching from just South of the equator in a South-eastern direction into the Pacific. They are subject to similar climatic conditions with high monsoonal rainfall regimes and also occasional cyclones, and the drought caused by the recent El Niño Southern Oscillation has seriously afflicted them. Their natural environment exhibits many common biotic elements, and there is not only a high natural but also a high cultural diversity. Their early colonial histories were similar: contacted first by Spanish and Portuguese explorers, then colonised by France, Germany and Great Britain in various combinations. The majority of the population of all three countries live in rural areas and their lives are based on a subsistence economy which makes use of a similar range of mainly tuberous staple crops. Their economic situation is also quite similar: low GNP and an export balance heavily dependent on the foreign driven extraction of natural resources (logging and mining) besides mainly small-scale cash-cropping (copra, coffee, tea, cocoa, oil palm and others). The secondary and tertiary sectors of the economy are underdeveloped. The three nations gained their independence between 1975 and 1980. Besides these common traits, there are also differences. The mainland of Papua New Guinea is the only large mass of land and the only island with high altitude (more than 2.000m ASL) areas. The islands which make up the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu are by comparison, numerous and low-lying. While Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands were was settled early (at least 40.000 years ago), human occupation of Vanuatu is more recent (about 3.000 years ago). In conservative view, the high altitude areas of New Guinea constitute one of the earliest centres of agriculture in the world with a history of cultivation stretching back 9.000 years. However, a low altitude economy based on arboriculture combined with low intensity gardening as observed at the Kilimeri research site goes back at least 20.000 years, and there is evidence that taro was planted in the Northern Solomon Islands at least 28.000 years ago (Spriggs 1998: 54). The interior of the Papua New Guinea mainland was much later contacted than the Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 7 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) islands further to the East and South. Only in 1930 the world realised that a large and dense population was living in the intermontane valleys of the Papua New Guinea mainland, while for instance the island of Espiritu Santo (Vanuatu) was contacted in 1606 by Pedro Ferdinand de Queiros. Consequently the population of the islands was for centuries subject to blackbirding and forced labour, as well as afflicted by imported diseases. This is still noticeable in the demographic differences: while Papua New Guinea shows in its densest settled montane areas a considerable population pressure, Vanuatu has lower population densities. Solomon Islands: the export of unprocessed logs accounts for 50- 60% of the total export revenue. Papua New Guinea: mining accounts for about 45% of the total export value. Demographic growth is sometimes considered responsible for an increasing decline of forest cover and an obstacle to conservation. However, in Melanesia industrial resource extraction is the main factor in the process of deforestation. Logging and mining have deeply affected the people and their environment in the Solomon Islands and in Papua New Guinea, while in Vanuatu with its smaller landmass industrial resource extraction has just begun. Avenir des Peuples des Forêts Tropicales (APFT) 8 Future of Rainforest Peoples (FRP) 1. GEOGRAPHICAL SITU ATION AND DEMOGRAPHY Table 1:Geographical data (see Appendix 2) Table 2:Demography (see Appendix 2) Relevant policy areas: tropical forest, environment, population growth, health The natural richness and diversity found in Melanesia is reflected by the APFT research sites: seashore and swamps, hilltops and mountain valleys, with varying climatic conditions and vegetation types forming the backdrop. Melanesians have their own way to classify their forest land. Everywhere primary forest is distinguished from secondary, often expressed as "forest" versus "old garden" or "where many gardens have been cut." People whose territories include considerable differences in altitude also distinguish and have labels for different forest zones found at different altitudes. Others, where altitude is not a major factor determining species composition of forest, use the opposition between dry (hill) and wet (swamp) to distinguish between different forest zones. The extent of forest cover is related to altitude and population densities. The low altitude sites have low population densities (0,5 to 7 people/km2) and high percentages of forest cover (up to 99%); the high altitude sites show considerable population densities (16 people/km2) and reduced forest cover (30-40%). Contributing factors are: -higher vulnerability of high altitude forest to human disturbance, -the introduction of the cold-tolerant sweet potato 200 - 300 years ago, allowing for intensified agriculture at higher altitudes (Golson 1977). The long-term data from Nokopo demonstrate considerable population growth (+60%) for the last 10 years (see detailed report Nokopo). In contrast, the long-term data from Ikundi reveal a much slighter population growth (+10%) over the