Alien Species in Norway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alien Species in Norway Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black List 2012 Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black List 2012 presents an overview of ecological impact assessments of alien species which reproduce in Norwegian territories. The assessments are based upon a new and semi- quantitative set of criteria, where the species’ invasion potential and ecological effect are considered. The work has been carried out by 11 groups of experts who have treated ca. 2500 species. Impact assessments have been made for 1180 alien species which reproduce in Norwegian territories and for 134 species which might arrive in Norway with the aid of humans in the future – so called ‘door knockers’. A total of 106 species are categorised as having a severe impact, 111 species as having a high impact, 198 species as having a potentially high impact, 399 species as having a low impact, and 366 species as having no known impact in Norwegian nature. In addition, species inform- ation has been gathered for 1071 alien species which do not reproduce on the Norwegian mainland and territorial waters, and 69 non-reproducing alien species observed in Svalbard. Distribution: Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre 7491 Trondheim Alien species in Norway Phone: +47 73592145 e-mail: [email protected] –with the Norwegian Black List www.biodiversity.no 2012 Alien species in Norway –with the Norwegian Black List 2012 Editors Lisbeth Gederaas, Toril Loennechen Moen, Sigrun Skjelseth, Line-Kristin Larsen Project management Lisbeth Gederaas Groups of experts See chapter “Te work of the expert groups” Database development and management Stein Arild Hoem, Helge Sandmark Layout Skipnes Kommunikasjon AS, Åshild S. Viken (front cover) Cover Harmonia axyridis Cover photo Udo Schmidt Internet adaption Helge Sandmark, Askild Olsen, Skjalg Woldstad English translation: Paul Shimmings Recommended citation Gederaas, L., Moen, T.L., Skjelseth, S. & Larsen, L.-K. (eds.). Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black List 2012. Te Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, Norway. Chapter recommended citation Sandvik, H. 2012. Methods and set of criteria. Pp. 57-64 in: Gederaas, L., Moen, T.L., Skjelseth, S. & Larsen, L.-K. (eds.). Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black List 2012. Te Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, Norway. Distributed by Te Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC), 7491 Trondheim, Norway. Phone: (+47) 73 59 21 45. E-mail: [email protected] Copies 300 Print Skipnes Kommunikasjon AS ISBN-13: 978-82-92838-38-9. Preface Te spread of alien species is considered one of the It must be emphasised that the Norwegian greatest global threats to biodiversity. Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre does not play society as a whole has become increasingly aware any role in the management of alien species, of alien species and their efects. Alien species may and thus does not consider whether or not an be responsible for considerable damage to native alien species should be allowed in Norway. species and habitats, and may have ecological Tis is an issue that must be decided by the impacts. Te spread and establishment of alien appropriate authorities. species have also resulted in signifcant negative economic consequences around the world, Since the Norwegian Biodiversity Information along with posing threats to human health and Centre presented the frst version of the agricultural species. Norwegian Black List in 2007, considerable progress has been made in developing the Te role of the Norwegian Biodiversity methods we use to assess the ecological impacts Information Centre is defned in our mandate, posed by alien species in Norway. Our method “Te Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre is based on quantitative criteria, which is a is responsible for assessing the ecological impacts considerable improvement over the purely associated with species that are non-native to qualitative method we used in 2007. Norway (alien species) and to provide an overview of alien species found in Norway.” Given the global scope of alien species, the need for further development of methodology Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian is still great. We need an international Black List 2012 thus focuses exclusively on process to develop a method that can assessments of ecological impact, and does not be used across national boundaries. Te consider other negative consequences that may Centre for Conservation Biology (CCB) at result from non-native invasive species. Tables the Norwegian University of Science and provide an overview of the 2320 alien species Technology (NTNU), which helped develop that are found in Norway. Our mandate also our methodology in conjunction with a directs us to limit our ecological risk assessment selection of other experts, has helped put to species non-native to Norway. Norway in a good position to aid in a further Harmonia axyridis Photo: Udo Schmidt 3 Preface Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black List 2012 development of methodology internationally. We The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre hopes think that Norwegian authorities should advocate this that Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black view in relevant international forums. List 2012 can both serve as management tool as well as a source of information on alien species for relevant Another important issue is the lack of information authorities and the public. on alien species. This lack is the biggest limitation on our use of quantitative methods. If Norway intends to Finally, we would like to thank the experts who have been continue to develop and expand its assessments of the involved in the method development, impact assessments ecological impact posed by alien species, Norwegian and writing of this document. These experts have made authorities must increase their efforts to strengthen our an invaluable contribution that has resulted in important knowledge base. new information and assessments of alien species. Trondheim 12th June 2012 Ivar Myklebust Director, Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre 4 Contents Preface .................................................... 3 Why do some species become a problem? ..... 41 The effects of alien species ............................. 43 Contents .................................................. 5 Structural changes in habitat ..................... 43 Influence on native species ........................ 48 Summary ................................................. 7 Genetic effects – introgression ................... 51 Vectors for diseases and parasites ............ 52 Introduction ............................................. 9 Climate change and alien species .................... 54 New methods and new set of criteria ........ 10 Acknowledgements ......................................... 56 Collation of information ............................. 10 Availability of data ...................................... 11 Methods and set of criteria ..................... 57 Definitions and delimitations ............................ 11 Invasion axis ..................................................... 58 What is an alien species? .......................... 11 Effect axis ......................................................... 61 Time delimitations ...................................... 12 Impact categories ............................................. 62 Geographical delimitations ......................... 12 Documentation .................................................. 63 ‘Door knockers’ ......................................... 12 Uncertainty ....................................................... 63 Alien species classified into four groups .... 14 Species not included in the assessments .. 14 The work of the expert groups ................... 65 Extent of existing knowledge ..................... 16 Selection of species ......................................... 65 What is the Black List? ..................................... 16 ‘Door knockers’ ......................................... 67 Species which do not reproduce in Norway 67 Alien species: introduction, Species which are excluded ..................... 67 establishment and spread ....................... 17 Taxonomy, names and localised information . 67 Native or alien species? ................................... 21 Species – and subspecies ......................... 67 Where do alien species come from? ............... 23 Areas ........................................................... 67 How do alien species get to Norway? .............. 26 Comprehensive information Intentional introduction .............................. 26 available on the internet ............................. 67 Unintentional introduction ......................... 33 Localised information ................................. 68 Secondary spread of alien species Vascular plants and adaptation of methodology 68 from neighbouring areas ............................ 35 State of knowledge – a challenge .................... 68 What happens when species arrive The groups of experts’ assessment in new environments? ....................................... 35 of background knowledge ............................... 69 Establishment and adaptation ................... 37 Expert group on algae ................................ 69 Spread ........................................................ 40 Expert group on fungi ................................ 70 Colpomenia peregrina Photo: Vivian Husa 5 Contents Alien species in Norway – with the Norwegian Black
Recommended publications
  • Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
    90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Updated List of Collembola Species Currently Recorded from South Africa Charlene Janion-Scheepers, Louis Deharveng, Anne Bedos, Steven L
    Updated list of Collembola species currently recorded from South Africa Charlene Janion-Scheepers, Louis Deharveng, Anne Bedos, Steven L. Chown To cite this version: Charlene Janion-Scheepers, Louis Deharveng, Anne Bedos, Steven L. Chown. Updated list of Collembola species currently recorded from South Africa. Zookeys, Pensoft, 2015, 503, pp.55-88. 10.3897/zookeys.503.8966. hal-01220558 HAL Id: hal-01220558 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01220558 Submitted on 18 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 503: 55–88Updated (2015) list of Collembola species currently recorded from South Africa 55 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.503.8966 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Updated list of Collembola species currently recorded from South Africa Charlene Janion-Scheepers1,3, Louis Deharveng2, Anne Bedos2, Steven L. Chown3 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa 2 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité ISYEB - UMR 7205 - CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 45 rue Buffon, F-75005, Paris, France 3 School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Corresponding author: Charlene Janion-Scheepers ([email protected]) Academic editor: W.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen Und Angaben Zur Verbreitung Und Ökologie Der Einzelnen Arten
    5 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie) Herausgeber: 4fr für Naturkunde, RosensteinV 70 19 l; , Staatliches Museum 1, D- r Stuttgart Stuttgarter Beitr. Naturk. Ser. A Nr. 506 170 S ,4. 9. 19.94 Professor Dr. Bernhard Ziegler zum 65. Geburtstag Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten The Tachinids (Diptera: Tachinidae) of Central Europe: Identification Keys for the Species and Data on Distribution and Ecology Von Hans-Peter Tschorsnig und Benno Herting, Stuttgart Mit 291 Abbildungen Summary Keys are given for all central and northern European species of Tachinidae (Diptera). The most important data on distribution and ecology (mainly habitat, phenology, and host-range) are listed for the central European species. Zuammenfassung Es werden Bestimmungsschlüssel für alle in Mittel- und Nordeuropa vorkommenden Arten der Tachinidae (Diptera) gegeben. Für jede mitteleuropäische Art werden die wichtigsten Kenndaten zur Verbreitung und Ökologie (vor allem Habitat, Flugzeit und Wirtskreis) aufge- listet. Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2 2. Beg'iff.c erklärungen 4 2.1. Allgemeines 4 2.2. Kopf 5 2.3. Thorax 7 2.4. Flügel 8 2.5. Beine 9 2.6. Abdomen 10 2.7. Bereifung 11 2.8. Färbung . 11 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 2 STUTTGARTER BEITRÄGE ZUR NATURKUNDE Ser. A, Nr. 506 2.9. Körpergröße 11 2.10. Abkürzungen 11 3. Schlüssel für die Gattungen 12 4. Schlüssel für die Arten . 42 4.1. Subfamilie Exoristinae 42 4.2. Subfamilie Tachininae 63 4.3. Subfamilie Dexiinae 79 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Tachinidae, Phasiinae; Anthomyiidae) Уссурийского Заповедника И Сопредельной Территории
    УдК 591.9:595.773.4 Маркова Т.О.1, Репш Н.В.1, Маслов М.В.2 1дальневосточный федеральный университет. школа педагогики, e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Государственный природный заповедник «Уссурийский» им. В.л. Комарова дВО РАН, e-mail: [email protected] Зоогеографический АНАЛИЗ ФАУНы ДВУКРыЛыХ (DIptera: tacHINIDae, pHaSIINae; aNtHomyIIDae) УССУРИйСКОГО ЗАПОВЕДНИКА И СОПРЕДЕЛьНОй территории Тахины подсем. Phasiinae (Diptera) являются специализированными паразитами насекомых (Hemiptera). Большинство представителей Anthomyiidae – виды-фитофаги, среди которых немало вредителей сельского и лесного хозяйства. Во время исследований (1996–2012 гг.) на территории Уссурийского заповедника и сопредельной обнаружено 37 видов Phasiinae (tachinidae), относя- щихся к 17 родам. Фауна Anthomyiidae составляет 36 видов, относящихся к 19 родам (74 % и 64 % фауны Приморского края соответственно). целью настоящего исследования являлось проведение ареалогического анализа фауны двукрылых (Diptera) семейства Tachinidae (phasiinae) и семейства Anthomyiidae Уссурийского за- поведника и сопредельной территории Южного Приморья, который представлен в нашей работе впервые. В основу классификации ареалов положена схема зоогеографического деления земного шара А.П. Семенова-Тян-Шанского с дополнениями по О.Л. Крыжановскому. При проведении ареалогического анализа использованы работы, в которых даются сведения о распространении видов двукрылых в Палеарктике, учтены данные о неарктических и ориентальных двукрылых. В подсемействе Phasiinae (tachinidae) выделено
    [Show full text]
  • 104 – Maggio-Settembre 2018 SOMMARIO / CONTENTS Matteo
    104 – maggio-settembre 2018 SOMMARIO / CONTENTS Matteo Gelardi Contribution to the knowledge of chinese boletes. III: Suillus phylopictus / Contributo alla conoscenza dei boleti cinesi. III: Suillus phylopictus 61 Enzo Musumeci Una rarità estrema: Deconica flocculosadal territorio alsaziano / An extreme rarity: Deconica flocculosa from the Alsatian territory 75 Pietro Voto The Pseudobaeospora taxa hosted in the Helsinki herbarium / I taxa di Pseudobaeospora depositati presso l'erbario di Helsinki 83 Alessandro Ruggero Ascomycota di Sardegna: Caloschypha fulgens e Ciboria rufofusca / Acomycota of Sardinia: Caloschypha fulgens and Ciboria rufofusca 88 SPAZIO RUBRICA Il genere Suillus Micheli / The genus Suillus Micheli A cura di Giovanni Segneri 99 Curiosità botaniche / Botanical curiosities La ripresa vegetativa dopo il passaggio del fuoco. 2 / The vegetative recovery after the passage of the fire. 2 A cura di Giovanni Segneri 106 La Micologia altrove / Mycology elsewhere A cura di Luigi Perrone 112 N. 104 RMR, Boll. Amer 104, Anno XXXIV, 2018 (2): 61-74 MATTEO GELARDI CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF CHINESE BOLETES. III: SUILLUS PHYLOPICTUS Abstract In this third communication the eastern Asian bolete Suillus phylopictus (Suillaceae) is reported based on material recently found in Yunnan Province (south-western China) in ectotrophically mycorrhizal association with five-needle Pinus armandii. A detailed macro- and micro- morphological description including ecological data is provided and accompanied by a colour image of fresh basidiomes
    [Show full text]
  • (Collembola) in Meadows, Pastures and Road Verges in Central Finland
    © Entomologica Fennica. 29 August 2017 Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pastures and road verges in Central Finland Atte Komonen* & Saana Kataja-aho Komonen, A. & Kataja-aho, S. 2017: Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pas- tures and road verges in Central Finland. — Entomol. Fennica 28: 157–163. Understanding of species distribution, abundance and habitat affinities is crucial for red-list assessment, conservation and habitat management. In Central Fin- land, we studied Collembola in three habitat types, namely non-grazed meadows, pastures and road verges using pitfall traps. Altogether, 9,630 Collembola indi- viduals were recorded. These belonged to 12 families, 34 genera and 60 species. The number of specimens was clearly higher in meadows than in pastures or road verges. The number of species, however, was higher in meadows and road verges (40 and 39 species, respectively) than in pastures (33 species). The overall spe- cies number is comparable to other large-scale sampling schemes in similar habi- tats. We recorded a few abundant species (Spatulosminthurus flaviceps, Smin- thurus viridis and Sminthurus nigromaculatus) that have been previously re- corded from very different biotopes. In conclusion, biodiversity inventories of soil fauna, as well as other biota, should also include marginal habitats, which of- ten host peculiar communities. A. Komonen, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environ- mental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; *Cor- responding author’s e-mail: [email protected] S. Kataja-aho, University of Jyväskylä, Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 November 2016, accepted 22 December 2016 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 80130Dimou7-107Weblist Changed
    Posted June, 2008. Summary published in Mycotaxon 104: 39–42. 2008. Mycodiversity studies in selected ecosystems of Greece: IV. Macrofungi from Abies cephalonica forests and other intermixed tree species (Oxya Mt., central Greece) 1 2 1 D.M. DIMOU *, G.I. ZERVAKIS & E. POLEMIS * [email protected] 1Agricultural University of Athens, Lab. of General & Agricultural Microbiology, Iera Odos 75, GR-11855 Athens, Greece 2 [email protected] National Agricultural Research Foundation, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Lakonikis 87, GR-24100 Kalamata, Greece Abstract — In the course of a nine-year inventory in Mt. Oxya (central Greece) fir forests, a total of 358 taxa of macromycetes, belonging in 149 genera, have been recorded. Ninety eight taxa constitute new records, and five of them are first reports for the respective genera (Athelopsis, Crustoderma, Lentaria, Protodontia, Urnula). One hundred and one records for habitat/host/substrate are new for Greece, while some of these associations are reported for the first time in literature. Key words — biodiversity, macromycetes, fir, Mediterranean region, mushrooms Introduction The mycobiota of Greece was until recently poorly investigated since very few mycologists were active in the fields of fungal biodiversity, taxonomy and systematic. Until the end of ’90s, less than 1.000 species of macromycetes occurring in Greece had been reported by Greek and foreign researchers. Practically no collaboration existed between the scientific community and the rather few amateurs, who were active in this domain, and thus useful information that could be accumulated remained unexploited. Until then, published data were fragmentary in spatial, temporal and ecological terms. The authors introduced a different concept in their methodology, which was based on a long-term investigation of selected ecosystems and monitoring-inventorying of macrofungi throughout the year and for a period of usually 5-8 years.
    [Show full text]
  • (Discomycetes) Collected in the Former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 3 Autor(en)/Author(s): Palmer James Terence, Tortic Milica, Matocec Neven Artikel/Article: Sclerotiniaceae (Discomycetes) collected in the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 41-70 Ost. Zeitschr. f. Pilzk. 3©Österreichische (1994) . Mykologische Gesellschaft, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 41 Sclerotiniaceae (Discomycetes) collected in the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia JAMES TERENCE PALMER MILICA TORTIC 25, Beech Road, Sutton Weaver Livadiceva 16 via Runcorn, Cheshire WA7 3ER, England 41000 Zagreb, Croatia NEVEN MATOCEC Institut "Ruöer BoSkovic" - C1M GBI 41000 Zagreb, Croatia Received April 8, 1994 I Key words: Ascomycotina, Sclerotiniaceae: Cihoria, Ciborinia, Dumontinia, Lambertella, Lanzia, Monilinia, Pycnopeziza, Rutstroemia. - Mycofloristics. - Former republics of Yugoslavia: Bosnia- Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia. Abstract: Collections by the first two authors during 1964-1968 and in 1993, and the third author in 1988-1993, augmented by several received from other workers, produced 27 species of Sclerotiniaceae, mostly common but including some rarely collected or reported: Ciboria gemmincola, Ciborinia bresadolae, Lambertella corni-maris, Lanzia elatina, Monilinia johnsonii and Pycnopeziza sejournei. Zusammenfassung: Aufsammlungen der beiden Erstautoren in den Jahren 1964-1968
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of the Myxomycetes, Larger Ascomycetes, and Larger
    Posted online: january 2009 “This internet site was updated on January 2011” Summary published in MYCOTAXON 106: 65-68. Sesli, E. and Denchev, CM. (2008). Checklists of the myxomycetes, larger ascomycetes, and larger basidiomycetes in Turkey. Mycotaxon 106: 65–67 + online version [2011]: 1-136 (http://www.mycotaxon.com/resources/checklists/sesli-v106-checklist.pdf) Checklists of the myxomycetes, larger ascomycetes, and larger basidiomycetes in Turkey 1 2 Ertuğrul Sesli & Cvetomir M. Denchev 1 Department of Biology Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (e-mail: [email protected]) 2 Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 23 Acad. G. Bonchev St., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria (e-mail: [email protected]) Corresponding author: [email protected] Sesli & Denchev – Checklists of the myxomycetes, larger ascomycetes, and larger basidiomycetes in Turkey 2 Abstract This paper attempts to compile available data on myxomycetes, larger ascomycetes, and larger basidiomycetes reported from or known to occur in Turkey, obtained from 428 publications issued between 1915 and January, 2011. Three main lists of correct names of myxomycetes, larger ascomycetes, and larger basidiomycetes, recognized as occurring in Turkey, are given, in which the taxa are alphabetically arranged. The total number of correct names of species, recognized as occurring in Turkey and presented in the checklists, is 2196, including 222 myxomycetes, 152 ascomycetes, and 1822 basidiomycetes. For each taxon, references are cited. An index of synonyms based on literature records from Turkey is appended. The index includes 890 species and infraspecific taxa. A list of excluded records of 80 species, providing reasons for their exclusion, is also given.
    [Show full text]
  • Spore Prints
    BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number271 April 1991 SURVIVORS' BANQUET Patrice Benson synthesis and can damage crops. According to Dr. Stuntz, an Erysiphales once destroyed the Eastern Wash­ Nearly 130 survivors ington pea canning industry; they also damage apple partook of a semi-pot­ crops. However, P. corylea isn't an important pathogen luck Hunter's Banquet in the Northwest, where lt grows on cascara. In other on March 15 at the areas, it grows mainly on hazel (Corylus). Center for Urban Hor­ ticulture. Everyone Only 1 mm wide, the mature fruiting body is attached contributed to make to the lower surface of a leaf by mycelia (fungal this year's feast a de­ threads). Spines radiate from its center, a dark flat­ light: Cooks, bakers, tened sphere with a sticky side. The spines are at­ servers, entertainers, tached by a knee-like bulb which has one thick wall and money changers, paste­ an opposing thin wall. The thin side dries faster than up artists, and cleanup the thick side, bending the splne--the way a board, wet crews. A big hug and on one side, warps. The bending spines raise the fun­ smile to all of you! gus away from the leaf, tearing lt loose from its myce­ Special thanks to the Polish Home Association for pro­ lial restraints. At this stage, it looks like Tranquility viding their kitchen free of charge for our production. Base standing on the moon. As it falls from the leaf, Washington Natural Gas supplied a portable stove deliv­ the folded spines keep the ered by Bill Newby.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Anne Mabille ([email protected]), Emmanuel Côtez MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Gustav Peters (ZFMK, Bonn, Allemagne) Norman I. Platnick (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Ptenothrix italica Dallai, 1973. Body size: 1.4 mm, immature. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Geodiversitas, Naturae. Diffusion – Publications scientifiques Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle CP 41 – 57 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Tél.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ
    An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Fungal Biota of the An Annotated Catalogue of the Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY Grzyby_okladka.indd 6 11.02.2019 14:52:24 An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY LUBLIN 2019 REVIEWER Dr hab. Małgorzata Ruszkiewicz-Michalska COVER DESIN, TYPESETTING Studio Format © Te Authors, 2019 © Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press, Lublin 2019 ISBN 978-83-227-9164-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-8-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-9-3 (online) PUBLISHER Polish Botanical Society Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland pbsociety.org.pl Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press 20-031 Lublin, ul. Idziego Radziszewskiego 11 tel. (81) 537 53 04 wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] Sales Department tel. / fax (81) 537 53 02 Internet bookshop: wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] PRINTED IN POLAND, by „Elpil”, ul. Artyleryjska 11, 08-110 Siedlce AUTHOR’S AFFILIATION Department of Botany and Mycology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Monika Kozłowska, [email protected]; Wiesław
    [Show full text]