DOCSLIB.ORG

Event-Based Climatology and Typology of Fog in the New York City Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Event-Based Climatology and Typology of Fog in the New York City Region VOLUME 46 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY AUGUST 2007 Event-Based Climatology and Typology of Fog in the New York City Region ROBERT TARDIF Research Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research,* and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado ROY M. RASMUSSEN Research Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado (Manuscript received 6 March 2006, in final form 3 November 2006) ABSTRACT The character of fog in a region centered on New York City, New York, is investigated using 20 yr of historical data. Hourly surface observations are used to identify fog events at 17 locations under the influence of various physiographic features, such as land–water contrasts, land surface character (urban, suburban, and rural), and terrain. Fog events at each location are classified by fog types using an objective algorithm derived after extensive examination of fog formation processes. Events are characterized accord- ing to frequency, duration, and intensity. A quantitative assessment of the likelihood with which mecha- nisms leading to fog formation are occurring in various parts of the region is obtained. The spatial, seasonal, and diurnal variability of fog occurrences are examined and results are related to regional and local influences. The results show that the likelihood of fog occurrence is influenced negatively by the presence of the urban heat island of New York City, whereas it is enhanced at locations under the direct influence of the marine environment. Inland suburban and rural locations also experience a considerable amount of fog. As in other areas throughout the world, the overall fog phenomenon is a superposition of various types. Precipitation fog, which occurs predominantly in winter, is the most common type. Fog resulting from cloud-base lowering also occurs frequently across the region, with an enhanced likelihood in winter and spring. A considerable number of advection fog events occur in coastal areas, mostly during spring, whereas radiation fog occurs predominantly at suburban and rural locations during late summer and early autumn but also occurs during the warm season in the coastal plain of New Jersey as advection–radiation events. 1. Introduction duce the number of weather delays by 20%–35%. On a national scale, such reductions could save between $500 Poor visibility associated with the presence of fog and $875 million annually. The study by Wilson and represents a hazard to aviation, marine, and road trans- Clark (1997) shows daily cost benefits of $100,000– portation worldwide (Croft 2003). Because of safety $1,000,000 associated with accurate forecasts of onset concerns, fog occurrences are associated with disrup- and dissipation of stratus clouds and fog. Allan et al. tions in air traffic at airports and navigation in marine (2001) found that timely forecasts of changes in ceiling ports. Unforeseen reductions in airport capacity asso- or visibility could lead to savings of $500,000 per event ciated with reduced ceiling and visibility lead to signifi- at the busy air terminals in the New York City (NYC), cant cost increments to the large air carriers. Valdez New York, area. For the general aviation community, (2000) concluded that more accurate forecasts of cloud fog is a major safety concern because accidents often ceiling or visibility with a 30-min lead time would re- occur in reduced visibility conditions (Whiffen 2001). Fog also contributes to creating hazardous conditions * The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored on the roads, as evidenced by the numerous multive- by the National Science Foundation. hicle accidents occurring each year under poor visibility conditions (Whiffen et al. 2003). These are exacerbated Corresponding author address: Robert Tardif, National Center in complex urban environments. for Atmospheric Research, Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80301. Advances in the understanding of the physics of fog E-mail: [email protected] have been made through numerous field experiments DOI: 10.1175/JAM2516.1 © 2007 American Meteorological Society 1141 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/06/21 02:10 PM UTC JAM2516 1142 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY VOLUME 46 (Taylor 1917; Roach et al. 1976; Choularton et al. 1981; general indication of the geographical distribution of Meyer et al. 1986; Findlater et al. 1989; Fitzjarrald and dominant fog types (Willett 1944; Byers 1959; Petters- Lala 1989; Duynkerke 1991; Fuzzi et al. 1998) and mod- sen 1969). These studies do not provide a level of detail eling studies (Lala et al. 1975; Turton and Brown 1987; sufficient enough to identify either the mechanisms in- Ballard et al. 1991; Bott 1991; Golding 1993; Bergot and fluencing the formation of all forms of fog or their Guédalia 1994; Teixeira 1999; Nakanishi 2000; space–time variability at the regional scale. Pagowski et al. 2004; Koracˇin et al. 2005; Thompson et The goals of the work presented herein are the iden- al. 2005). Most of these studies focused on a single type tification and classification of fog events into specific of fog, either radiation or sea (advection) fog. There- types that reflect the primary mechanism responsible fore, a complete understanding of the processes influ- for their formation in the complex environment of the encing the life cycle of fog in its numerous forms re- NYC region.1 The characterization of the spatial and mains elusive. This is particularly true for fog occurring temporal variability of fog is also an objective. This in areas characterized by a complex environment. One approach is deemed more insightful than general sta- such region is the West Coast of the United States, tion climatologies because it provides specific informa- where sea fog has been studied extensively [see Leipper tion about the distribution (spatial and temporal) of (1994) and listed references therein, as well as the more fog-forming mechanisms. The approach provides an al- recent work of Koracˇin et al. (2001), Lewis et al. (2003), ternative to the synoptic classification approach (e.g., Koracˇin et al. (2005), and Thompson et al. (2005)]. The Croft and Burton 2006) by focusing on the local-scale complex coastline and topography, variations in land aspects of fog formation rather than on large-scale surface characteristics, and high levels of pollution weather patterns. The characterization of the associ- provide a wide range of influences that can potentially ated large-scale weather patterns and other influences affect the dynamical behavior (Fitzjarrald and Lala follows naturally once specific fog types have been 1989; Sachweh and Koepke 1997) and microphysical identified, as shown by Meyer and Lala (1990). The characteristics of fog (Goodman 1977; Hudson 1980; analysis of large-scale weather patterns and other envi- Bott 1991). [See also the online University Corporation ronmental conditions associated with fog events for for Atmospheric Research/Cooperative Program for each fog type will be the subject of future efforts. Operational Meteorology, Education and Training Section 2 presents the dataset used in this study and (UCAR/COMET) modules for comprehensive discus- the various analysis procedures used to identify and sions on factors affecting fog (http://www.meted.ucar. characterize fog events. The overall character of fog is edu/topics_fog.php).] described in section 3, and section 4 contains an analy- The NYC region, located on the eastern seaboard of sis of the character of the various fog types. A discus- the United States, is another fog-prone coastal region sion is presented in section 5, and conclusions are out- with similar physiographic complexities (complex lined in section 6. coastline; presence of urban, suburban, and rural areas; valleys; and rivers and lakes) and with significant vari- 2. Dataset and analysis procedure ability in aerosols (Ito et al. 2004). However, fog in that part of the United States has not been studied as ex- a. Datasets tensively as on the West Coast. George (1940) per- The main surface data used in this study are from the formed pioneering work on the identification of fog-in- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ducing mechanisms and associated weather regimes for Techniques Development Laboratory Surface Hourly several locations in the eastern and southern United Observations dataset (National Center for Atmo- States, with one location in the general vicinity of NYC. spheric Research 2006). These are complemented by Fitzjarrald and Lala (1989) and Meyer and Lala (1990) data from a buoy located south of Long Island to char- studied boundary layer mechanisms and climatological acterize offshore conditions during specific fog events. parameters associated with radiation fog for a location Hourly land surface observations of visibility, tempera- in the Hudson Valley, north of NYC. More recently, ture, dewpoint temperature, wind speed and direction, Croft and Burton (2006) examined the relationship be- ceiling height, cloud cover, coded obstruction to vision, tween the extent of fog and the various synoptic and precipitation type and intensity, covering the pe- weather patterns during a single winter season in the northern mid-Atlantic part of the United States. Other 1 This work is in support of a project funded by the Federal studies provide general annual (Peace 1969) and Aviation Administration focused on the improvement of forecasts monthly (Hardwick 1973) fog frequencies at the na- of low cloud ceiling and reduced visibility (fog) occurrences at tional scale, while others have attempted to provide a New York City’s airports. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/06/21 02:10 PM UTC AUGUST 2007 TARDIF AND RASMUSSEN 1143 FIG. 1. Map showing the land use of a region centered on New York City, as well as the locations of the 17 land surface stations and the buoy (44025) used in this study. riod from 1977 to 1996, are used to identify and char- Stations were selected such that the main physi- acterize fog events. This dataset contains data from a ographic characteristics of a region centered on NYC period of homogeneous reporting practices, before the are represented.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • An Operational Marine Fog Prediction Model
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NATIONAL METEOROLOGICAL CENTER OFFICE NOTE 371 An Operational Marine Fog Prediction Model JORDAN C. ALPERTt DAVID M. FEIT* JUNE 1990 THIS IS AN UNREVIEWED MANUSCRIPT, PRIMARILY INTENDED FOR INFORMAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AMONG NWS STAFF MEMBERS t Global Weather and Climate Modeling Branch * Ocean Products Center OPC contribution No. 45 An Operational Marine Fog Prediction Model Jordan C. Alpert and David M. Feit NOAA/NMC, Development Division Washington D.C. 20233 Abstract A major concern to the National Weather Service marine operations is the problem of forecasting advection fogs at sea. Currently fog forecasts are issued using statistical methods only over the open ocean domain but no such system is available for coastal and offshore areas. We propose to use a partially diagnostic model, designed specifically for this problem, which relies on output fields from the global operational Medium Range Forecast (MRF) model. The boundary and initial conditions of moisture and temperature, as well as the MRF's horizontal wind predictions are interpolated to the fog model grid over an arbitrarily selected coastal and offshore ocean region. The moisture fields are used to prescribe a droplet size distribution and compute liquid water content, neither of which is accounted for in the global model. Fog development is governed by the droplet size distribution and advection and exchange of heat and moisture. A simple parameterization is used to describe the coefficients of evaporation and sensible heat exchange at the surface. Depletion of the fog is based on droplet fallout of the three categories of assumed droplet size.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 18 Condensation And
    Lecture 18 Condensation and Fog Cloud Formation by Condensation • Mixed into air are myriad submicron particles (sulfuric acid droplets, soot, dust, salt), many of which are attracted to water molecules. As RH rises above 80%, these particles bind more water and swell, producing haze. • When the air becomes supersaturated, the largest of these particles act as condensation nucleii onto which water condenses as cloud droplets. • Typical cloud droplets have diameters of 2-20 microns (diameter of a hair is about 100 microns). • There are usually 50-1000 droplets per cm3, with highest droplet concentra- tions in polluted continental regions. Why can you often see your breath? Condensation can occur when warm moist (but unsaturated air) mixes with cold dry (and unsat- urated) air (also contrails, chimney steam, steam fog). Temp. RH SVP VP cold air (A) 0 C 20% 6 mb 1 mb(clear) B breath (B) 36 C 80% 63 mb 55 mb(clear) C 50% cold (C)18 C 140% 20 mb 28 mb(fog) 90% cold (D) 4 C 90% 8 mb 6 mb(clear) D A • The 50-50 mix visibly condenses into a short- lived cloud, but evaporates as breath is EOM 4.5 diluted. Fog Fog: cloud at ground level Four main types: radiation fog, advection fog, upslope fog, steam fog. TWB p. 68 • Forms due to nighttime longwave cooling of surface air below dew point. • Promoted by clear, calm, long nights. Common in Seattle in winter. • Daytime warming of ground and air ‘burns off’ fog when temperature exceeds dew point. • Fog may lift into a low cloud layer when it thickens or dissipates.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Fog
    CHAPTER 4: FOG Fog is a double threat to boaters. It not only reduces visibility but also distorts sound, making collisions with obstacles – including other boats – a serious hazard. 1. Introduction Fog is a low-lying cloud that forms at or near the surface of the Earth. It is made up of tiny water droplets or ice crystals suspended in the air and usually gets its moisture from a nearby body of water or the wet ground. Fog is distinguished from mist or haze only by its density. In marine forecasts, the term “fog” is used when visibility is less than one nautical mile – or approximately two kilometres. If visibility is greater than that, but is still reduced, it is considered mist or haze. It is important to note that foggy conditions are reported on land only if visibility is less than half a nautical mile (about one kilometre). So boaters may encounter fog near coastal areas even if it is not mentioned in land-based forecasts – or particularly heavy fog, if it is. Fog Caused Worst Maritime Disaster in Canadian History The worst maritime accident in Canadian history took place in dense fog in the early hours of the morning on May 29, 1914, when the Norwegian coal ship Storstadt collided with the Canadian Pacific ocean liner Empress of Ireland. More than 1,000 people died after the Liverpool-bound liner was struck in the side and sank less than 15 minutes later in the frigid waters of the St. Lawrence River near Rimouski, Quebec. The Captain of the Empress told an inquest that he had brought his ship to a halt and was waiting for the weather to clear when, to his horror, a ship emerged from the fog, bearing directly upon him from less than a ship’s length away.
    [Show full text]
  • B-100063 Cloud-Seeding Activities Carried out in the United States
    WASHINGXJN. O.C. 205.48 13-100063 Schweikcr: LM096545 This is in response to your request of September 22, .2-o 1971, for certain background informatio-n on cloud-seeding activities carried out -...-in _-..T---*the .Unitc.b_S~.~-~,.under programs supported-by the Federal agencies. Pursuant to the specific xz2- questions contained in your request, we directed our:review toward developing information-----a-=v-~ .,- , L-..-”on- .-cloud-seeding ,__ ._ programs sup- ported by Federal agencies, on the cost- ‘and purposes of such progrys, on the impact of cloud seeding on precipitation and severe storms, and on the types of chemicals used for seeding and their effect on the--environment. We also ob- tained dafa cdncerning the extent of cloud seeding conducted over Pennsylvania. Our review was conducted at various Federal departments ’ and agencies headquartered in Washington, D.C., and at cer- tain of their field offices in Colorado and Montana. We in- terviewed cognizant agency officials and reviewed appropriate records and files of the agencies. In addition, we reviewed pertinent reports and documentation of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, the National Academy of Sciences, and the National Water Commission. BACKGROUND AND COST DATA Several Federal agencies support weather modification programs which involve cloud-seeding activities. Major re- search programs include precipitation modification, fog and cloud modification, hail suppression, and lightning and hur- ricane modification. Statistics compiled by the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences showed that costs for federally spon- sored weather modification rograms during fiscal years 1959 through 1970 totaled about %‘74 million; estimated costs for fiscal years 1971 and 1972 totaled about $35 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Microclimates
    Microclimates National Meteorological Library and Archive Fact sheet 14 — Microclimates The National Meteorological Library and Archive Many people have an interest in the weather and the processes that cause it and the National Meteorological Library and Archive is a treasure trove of meteorological and related information. We are open to everyone The Library and Archive are vital for maintaining the public memory of the weather, storing meteorological records and facilitating learning, just go to www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/library-and-archive Our collections We hold a world class collection on meteorology which includes a comprehensive library of published books, journals and reports as well as a unique archive of original meteorological data, weather charts, private weather diaries and much more. These records provide access to historical data and give a snapshot of life and the weather both before and after the establishment of the Met Office in 1854 when official records began. Online catalogue Details of all our holdings are catalogued and online public access to this is available at https://library. metoffice.gov.uk. From here you will also be able to directly access any of our electronic content. Factsheets The Met Office produces a range of factsheets which are available through our web pages www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/library-and-archive/publications/factsheets Digital Library and Archive The Met Office Digital Library and Archive provides access to a growing collection of born digital content as well as copies of some our older publications and unique archive treasures. Just go to https://digital. nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions and Effects Susan M
    SMOKE PLUMES: EMISSIONS AND EFFECTS Susan M. O’Neill, Shawn Urbanski, Scott Goodrick, and Narasimhan K. Larkin moke can manifest itself as a towering plume rising against Smoke can affect public health, Sthe clear blue sky—or as a vast transportation safety, and the health swath of thick haze, with fingers that settle into valleys overnight. It and well-being of firefighters. comes in many forms and colors, from fluffy and white to thick and black. Smoke plumes can rise high 1). Overall, dry air is made up of 78 affect visibility, degrading vistas and into the atmosphere and travel percent nitrogen (N2), 21 percent creating transportation hazards. great distances across oceans and oxygen (O2), and about 1 percent Smoke combined with high humid­ continents. Or smoke can remain trace gases (about 0.9 percent ity can produce whiteout conditions close to the ground and follow fine- argon (Ar) and 0.1 percent other known as superfog (Achtemaier scale topographical features. trace gases). Water vapor in the 2002). air ranges from almost nothing to Along the way, the gases and par­ 5 percent. Yet the trace amount Wildland Fire Emissions ticles in the plumes react physically of smoke in the air can have sig­ If fire were 100-percent efficient, and chemically, creating additional nificant impacts, such as making the only products released would particulate matter and gases such the air smell bad; limiting vis­ be carbon dioxide, water vapor, as ozone (O3). If atmospheric water ibility; and affecting the health of and heat. However, the combus­ content is high, smoke plumes can vegetation and animals, including tion of wildland fuels is never also create “superfog” (Achtemeier humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/29/21 03:20 PM UTC 740 WEATHER and FORECASTING VOLUME 35
    APRIL 2020 P I T H A N I E T A L . 739 Real-Time Forecast of Dense Fog Events over Delhi: The Performance of the WRF Model during the WiFEX Field Campaign a,b a c d b PRAKASH PITHANI, SACHIN D. GHUDE, R. K. JENAMANI, MRINAL BISWAS, C. V. NAIDU, a,e a,e a a SREYASHI DEBNATH, RACHANA KULKARNI, NARENDRA G. DHANGAR, CHINMAY JENA, a a a a ANUPAM HAZRA, R. PHANI, P. MUKHOPADHYAY, THARA PRABHAKARAN, a,f g RAVI S. NANJUNDIAH, AND M. RAJEEVAN a Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India b Department of Meteorology and Oceanography, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India c India Meteorological Department, New ATC Building, IGI Airport, New Delhi, India d National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado e Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India f Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India g Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, India (Manuscript received 6 June 2019, in final form 29 January 2020) ABSTRACT A Winter Fog Experiment (WiFEX) was conducted to study the genesis of fog formation between winters 2016–17 and 2017–18 at Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA), Delhi, India. To support the WiFEX field campaign, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model was used to produce real-time forecasts at 2-km horizontal grid spacing. This paper summarizes the performance of the model forecasts for 43 very dense fog episodes (visibility , 200 m) and preliminary evaluation of the model against the observations. Similarly, near-surface liquid water content (LWC) from models and continuous visibility observations are used as a metric for model evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2A.1 FOG and THUNDERSTORM FORECASTING in MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA Harvey Stern* Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    2A.1 FOG AND THUNDERSTORM FORECASTING IN MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA Harvey Stern* Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia 1. INTRODUCTION Although a lift in the CSI did not occur in every single instance when the verification data was analysed with A twelve-month "real-time" trial of a methodology all lead times taken separately, a lift occurred in most utilised to generate Day-1 to Day-7 forecasts, by instances. The exceptions were in the cases of Day-1 mechanically integrating judgmental (human) and and Day-2 forecasts of fog, where the CSIs were automated predictions, was conducted between 20 substantially below corresponding CSIs for the human August 2005 and 19 August 2006. After 365 days, the (official) forecasts. trial revealed that, overall, the various components (rainfall amount, sensible weather, minimum These forecasts are worthy of comment. The inability temperature, and maximum temperature) of (of the combining process) to improve on the Day-1 Melbourne forecasts so generated explained 41.3% and Day-2 official forecasts of fog may very well be a variance of the weather, 7.9% more variance than the consequence of the effort that the forecasting 33.4% variance explained by the human (official) personnel of the Victorian Regional Office (and others) forecasts alone (Stern, 2007a, 2007b). have invested over the years into short term fog and low cloud forecasting at Melbourne Airport (Goodhead, The trial continues and the purpose of the current 1978; Keith, 1978; Stern and Parkyn, 1998, 1999, paper is to report on its performance at predicting fog 2000, 2001; Newham, 2004, Weymouth et al, 2007; and thunderstorms between August 2005 and June Newham et al, 2007), most recently using a Bayesian 2007, a period of almost two years.
    [Show full text]
  • FOG-82: a Cooperative Field Study and James E
    Michael B. Meyer, G. Garland Lala, FOG-82: A Cooperative Field Study and James E. Jiusto1 Atmospheric Sciences Research Center of Radiation Fog State University of New York at Albany Albany, NY 12222 Abstract The Cloud Physics Section of the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center-State University of New York at Albany conducted a coop- erative field study (FOG-82) during the autumn of 1982 as part of an ongoing radiation-fog research program. A computer-controlled data-acquisition system consisting of sophisticated soil, surface, and boundary-layer sensors, as well as contemporary aerosol and drop- let probes was developed. These data are being used to address a var- iety of critical problems related to radiation-fog evolution. Scientists from 10 universities and research laboratories partici- pated in portions of FOG-82. Research objectives included studies of fog mesoscale meteorology, radiation studies, low-level water budget, vertical fog structure, fog supersaturation, condensation nuclei, and fog-water chemistry, as well as radiation-fog life cycles. A comprehensive description of the FOG-82 program and objectives is presented. FIG . 1. Monthly heavy-fog (visibility, V less than or equal to 1/4 1. Introduction mile) [solid line] and heavy-fog-duration [dashed line] frequency for Albany, New York, 1970-79. The Cloud Physics Section of the Atmospheric Sciences Re- search Center-State University of New York at Albany (ASRC-SUNY) has been involved in fog research for many years, concentrating on the understanding of fog-evolution processes through field measurements and numerical fog modeling. Additional work has been done in fog (synoptic) climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Lightning Fires, by E. V
    Proceedings: 7th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 1967 The Nature of Lightning Fires E. V. KOMAREK, SR. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida THE PREVALENCE and behavior of lightning fires are of interest to those of us who study the mosaic of plants and animals and attempt to interpret the ecological conditions existing before changes made by man. We at Tall Timbers are particularly interested in those natural processes and principles that underlie the occurrence, abundance, and welfare of the plants and animals that surround us. We are vitally concerned with the ecology of man and his environment. Lightning, and lightning fires assumed a position of great impact on ecosystems before man came to this continent some 20,000 years ago, more or less. As I have discussed many phases of this "fire mosaic" in several previous papers (1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966), let me simply state the obvious: Man did not invent fire or forest fires. They were a part of the natural environment long before the coming of man. My personal interest as a fire ecologist is to develop an under­ standing of the many ramifications of fire in nature; its effects on the habitat and on the plants and animals themselves as well. At the same time, however, I wish to point out that as an ecologist I am all too aware that man himself is a creature of his environment -his fire environment if you will. Thus, if man is to be successful in this environment with its great potentiality for fires he must understand the processes that control such an environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for Road Weather Management
    Best Practices for Road Weather Management Version 3.0 June 2012 Acknowledgments While many individuals deserve recognition, the authors want to particularly acknowledge all the staff at the participating state departments of transportation who provided materials and were generous with their time and expertise. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-12-046 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2012 Best Practices for Road Weather Management, Version 3.0 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Co-Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Ray Murphy, FHWA; Ryan Swick, Booz Allen Hamilton; Gabe Guevara, FHWA 9.
    [Show full text]