DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Analysis of 83 Plastid Genes Further Resolves the Early Diversification of Eudicots

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogenetic Analysis of 83 Plastid Genes Further Resolves the Early Diversification of Eudicots Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots Michael J. Moorea,1, Pamela S. Soltisb, Charles D. Bellc, J. Gordon Burleighd, and Douglas E. Soltisd aBiology Department, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074; bFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148; and dDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 Edited* by Michael J. Donoghue, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved January 26, 2010 (received for review July 14, 2009) Although Pentapetalae (comprising all core eudicots except Gun- (BS) values regardless of the partitioning strategy (Fig. 1 and Figs. nerales) include ≈70% of all angiosperms, the origin of and rela- S1–S3). The ML topologies were also similar to the maximum tionships among the major lineages of this clade have remained parsimony (MP) topology (Fig. S4). Relationships among early- largely unresolved. Phylogenetic analyses of 83 protein-coding diverging angiosperms and among many clades of Mesangio- and rRNA genes from the plastid genome for 86 species of seed spermae agree with those from the largest previous plastid genome plants, including new sequences from 25 eudicots, indicate that analyses (12, 15). Below, we focus on results regarding relation- soon after its origin, Pentapetalae diverged into three clades: (i) ships within the eudicots, with an emphasis on the ML topologies. a “superrosid” clade consisting of Rosidae, Vitaceae, and Saxifra- Within Eudicotyledoneae, a basal grade emerged, with most gales; (ii)a“superasterid” clade consisting of Berberidopsidales, nodes receiving 100% ML BS support. In all ML analyses, Santalales, Caryophyllales, and Asteridae; and (iii) Dilleniaceae. Ranunculales were sister to all remaining eudicots (BS = 100%), Maximum-likelihood analyses support the position of Dilleniaceae followed by a clade of Sabiaceae + Proteales (BS = 70–80%, as sister to superrosids, but topology tests did not reject alterna- depending on partitioning strategy) as sister to a strongly supported tive positions of Dilleniaceae as sister to Asteridae or all remaining clade (BS = 100%) of Trochodendraceae + Buxaceae + Gunner- Pentapetalae. Molecular dating analyses suggest that the major idae (Gunneridae = Gunnerales + Pentapetalae; Fig. 1 and Figs. lineages within both superrosids and superasterids arose in as S1–S3). However, the approximately unbiased (AU) test did not little as 5 million years. This phylogenetic hypothesis provides a reject alternative relationships among Sabiaceae, Proteales, and EVOLUTION crucial historical framework for future studies aimed at elucidating remaining eudicots (Table S1). In all but one ML analysis, Buxaceae the underlying causes of the morphological and species diversity were recovered as sister to Gunneridae with BS = 52–70%, in Pentapetalae. depending on partitioning strategy (Fig. 1 and Figs. S1 and S2). In the CodonPartBL partition, Trochodendraceae were sister to Angiosperm Tree of Life | Pentapetalae | plastid genome Gunneridae, but with less than 50% bootstrap support (Fig. S2). Within the strongly supported (BS = 100%) Gunneridae, he Eudicotyledoneae (sensu) (1), or eudicots, comprise Gunnerales were sister to Pentapetalae (BS = 100%). Pentape- “ ≈75% of all angiosperm species (2) and encompass enor- talae comprised three major clades in the ML trees: (i)a super- T ” – mous morphological, biochemical, and ecological diversity. More rosid clade (BS = 96 100%) of Saxifragales, Vitaceae, and “ ” – than 90% of eudicot species diversity is found within the clade Rosidae; (ii)a superasterid clade (BS = 92 100%) of Santa- lales, Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, and Asteridae; and (iii) Pentapetalae (1), which includes major clades such as Rosidae, – Caryophyllales, Saxifragales, Asteridae, and Santalales, as well as Dilleniaceae (Fig. 1 and Figs. S1 S3). The superrosid and super- smaller lineages such as Berberidopsidales and Dilleniaceae (3– asterid clades were also recovered in the MP trees (Fig. S4), with 8). Previous analyses of multigene data sets have failed to resolve one major difference in composition. Whereas ML placed Dillenia relationships among the major clades of Pentapetalae (6, 9). The (the single representative of Dilleniaceae in the data set) sister to superrosids (Fig. 1 and Figs. S1–S3), MP placed Dillenia sister to inability to resolve these relationships suggests that the major Caryophyllales, with 97% BS support (Fig. S4). Still, the MP lineages of Pentapetalae diverged rapidly, a hypothesis sup- analysis also supported a superrosid clade of Vitaceae + Saxi- ported by the fossil record (10, 11). However, our understanding fragales + Rosidae with 99% BS. When Dillenia was constrained of the origins and evolution of Pentapetalae diversity, and con- to be sister to the superrosid clade, the best MP tree was 44 steps sequently much of angiosperm diversity, is hindered by the lack longer than the best unconstrained tree. A Templeton test (16) of a well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis. failed to reject this alternative topology (n = 712; P = 0.099). For Phylogenetic analyses based on complete plastid genome ML, AU tests strongly rejected topologies in which Dillenia was sequences have resolved several enigmatic relationships within sister to Caryophyllales (Table S1); however, they did not reject angiosperms (12, 13). However, these analyses have not included the placement of Dillenia as sister to all remaining Pentapetalae or data for many crucial eudicot clades. To resolve relationships as sister to the superasterids. among the major clades of Eudicotyledoneae (with a focus on Parametric bootstrapping provided evidence of bias in the MP Pentapetalae), we performed phylogenetic analyses using a data analyses against placing Dillenia as sister to the superrosid clade. set composed of 83 genes derived from 86 complete plastid genome sequences, 25 of which were eudicot sequences generated for this study. To date, this is the largest plastid genome data set Author contributions: P.S.S. and D.E.S. designed research; M.J.M. performed research; M.J. used for phylogenetic inference and includes representatives of M., C.D.B., J.G.B., and D.E.S. analyzed data; and M.J.M., P.S.S., C.D.B., J.G.B., and D.E.S. nearly all (37 of 42) orders of eudicots sensu Angiosperm Phy- wrote the paper. logeny Group (APG) III (14). The resulting phylogenetic The authors declare no conflict of interest. hypothesis helps to clarify the diversification of Pentapetalae and *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. provides an improved framework for investigating evolutionary Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. processes that accompanied this radiation. Data Deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gen- Bank database (accession nos. GQ996966–GQ998871). Results 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. Phylogenetic Analyses. Maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses of the This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/ 83-gene alignment yielded similar trees and bootstrap support 0907801107/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0907801107 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 Acorus Dioscorea Elaeis Musa * * * 95 Oryza * Triticum 98 * Zea Monocotyledoneae * * Typha Phalaenopsis * Yucca Lemna Anethum * Daucus 96 * Panax Lonicera * Helianthus Campanulidae * * Lactuca * * Scaevola Trachelium Ilex Antirrhinum * * Epifagus Jasminum Asteridae * Atropa * Solanum 46 * * Nicotiana * Cuscuta Lamiidae 99 * Ipomoea * Coffea 43 * Nerium Eudicotyledoneae * Ehretia Pentapetalae Aucuba 88 Rhododendron Cornus * Plumbago * Spinacia Caryophyllales SUPER- * Berberidopsis 85 Phoradendron * Ximenia Santalales ASTERIDS Arabidopsis * * Brassica * Gossypium * Citrus Staphylea Malvidae 97 * Eucalyptus * Oenothera Pelargonium * Bulnesia * 98 Cucumis Quercus 55 Ficus Rosidae * Morus * * Glycine * Phaseolus * Lotus Fabidae 53 88 * Medicago Euonymus * * Oxalis * Manihot * Passiflora * Populus SUPER- 70 Heuchera * Liquidambar Saxifragales Vitaceae Vitis ROSIDS * Dillenia DILLENIACEAE Gunnera Buxus 80 * Trochodendron * Meliosma * Nelumbo Platanus basal eudicots 64 * Nandina * Ranunculus Ceratophyllum * Calycanthus Ceratophyllum 99 Liriodendron super asterids * Drimys Magnoliidae 72 Piper Rosidae * Chloranthus Illicium Chloranthaceae * 82 Saxifragales Nuphar early-diverging 64 * Nymphaea Vitis Amborella angiosperms Dillenia 91 Cycas Ginkgo Pinus 0.01 substitutions/site INSET Fig. 1. Phylogram of the best ML tree as determined by RAxML (−ln L = 1101960.962) for the 83-gene data set. Numbers associated with branches are ML bootstrap support values. Asterisks indicate ML BS = 100%; the inset box in the lower right gives ML BS values for the basalmost branches of Pentapetalae, which are too short to visualize in the overall phylogram. The tree was rooted with Cycas, Ginkgo, and Pinus. Underlined genera names indicate plastid genomes newly sequenced for this study. When data sets were simulated using the ML topology, ML Within the superrosids, the relationships among Vitaceae, analyses of all 200 simulated data sets placed Dillenia sister to Saxifragales, and rosids were not strongly supported (Fig. 1 and superrosids; however, MP analyses of only 19 of the 200 data sets Figs. S1–S4). With MP, Saxifragales were sister to a clade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Santalales (Including Mistletoes)"
    Santalales (Including Introductory article Mistletoes) Article Contents . Introduction Daniel L Nickrent, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA . Taxonomy and Phylogenetics . Morphology, Life Cycle and Ecology . Biogeography of Mistletoes . Importance of Mistletoes Online posting date: 15th March 2011 Mistletoes are flowering plants in the sandalwood order that produce some of their own sugars via photosynthesis (Santalales) that parasitise tree branches. They evolved to holoparasites that do not photosynthesise. Holopar- five separate times in the order and are today represented asites are thus totally dependent on their host plant for by 88 genera and nearly 1600 species. Loranthaceae nutrients. Up until recently, all members of Santalales were considered hemiparasites. Molecular phylogenetic ana- (c. 1000 species) and Viscaceae (550 species) have the lyses have shown that the holoparasite family Balano- highest species diversity. In South America Misodendrum phoraceae is part of this order (Nickrent et al., 2005; (a parasite of Nothofagus) is the first to have evolved Barkman et al., 2007), however, its relationship to other the mistletoe habit ca. 80 million years ago. The family families is yet to be determined. See also: Nutrient Amphorogynaceae is of interest because some of its Acquisition, Assimilation and Utilization; Parasitism: the members are transitional between root and stem para- Variety of Parasites sites. Many mistletoes have developed mutualistic rela- The sandalwood order is of interest from the standpoint tionships with birds that act as both pollinators and seed of the evolution of parasitism because three early diverging dispersers. Although some mistletoes are serious patho- families (comprising 12 genera and 58 species) are auto- gens of forest and commercial trees (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales
    Kingdom: Plantae Phylum: Tracheophyta Class: Magnoliopsida Order: Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales, Caryophyllales, Celastrales, Ericales, Fabales, Garryales, Gentianales, Lamiales, Laurales, Magnoliales, Malpighiales, Malvales, Myrtales, Oxalidales, Picramniales, Piperales, Proteales, Rosales, Santalales, Sapindales, Solanales Family: Achariaceae, Anacardiaceae, Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Araliaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bixaceae, Boraginaceae, Burseraceae, Calophyllaceae, Canellaceae, Cannabaceae, Capparaceae, Cardiopteridaceae, Caricaceae, Caryocaraceae, Celastraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Clusiaceae, Combretaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Ebenaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Emmotaceae, Erythroxylaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Goupiaceae, Hernandiaceae, Humiriaceae, Hypericaceae, Icacinaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Lacistemataceae, Lamiaceae, Lauraceae, Lecythidaceae, Lepidobotryaceae, Linaceae, Loganiaceae, Lythraceae, Malpighiaceae, Malvaceae, Melastomataceae, Meliaceae, Monimiaceae, Moraceae, Myristicaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Ochnaceae, Olacaceae, Oleaceae, Opiliaceae, Pentaphylacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Picramniaceae, Piperaceae, Polygonaceae, Primulaceae, Proteaceae, Putranjivaceae, Rhabdodendraceae, Rhamnaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae, Sabiaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Siparunaceae, Solanaceae, Stemonuraceae, Styracaceae, Symplocaceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, Violaceae, Vochysiaceae Genus: Abarema, Acioa, Acosmium, Agonandra, Aiouea, Albizia, Alchornea,
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genomes Shed Light on Phylogenetic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae) Ju Namgung1,4, Hoang Dang Khoa Do1,2,4, Changkyun Kim1, Hyeok Jae Choi3 & Joo‑Hwan Kim1* Allioideae includes economically important bulb crops such as garlic, onion, leeks, and some ornamental plants in Amaryllidaceae. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) sequences of 17 species of Allioideae, fve of Amaryllidoideae, and one of Agapanthoideae. These cpDNA sequences represent 80 protein‑coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA genes, and range from 151,808 to 159,998 bp in length. Loss and pseudogenization of multiple genes (i.e., rps2, infA, and rpl22) appear to have occurred multiple times during the evolution of Alloideae. Additionally, eight mutation hotspots, including rps15-ycf1, rps16-trnQ-UUG, petG-trnW-CCA , psbA upstream, rpl32- trnL-UAG , ycf1, rpl22, matK, and ndhF, were identifed in the studied Allium species. Additionally, we present the frst phylogenomic analysis among the four tribes of Allioideae based on 74 cpDNA coding regions of 21 species of Allioideae, fve species of Amaryllidoideae, one species of Agapanthoideae, and fve species representing selected members of Asparagales. Our molecular phylogenomic results strongly support the monophyly of Allioideae, which is sister to Amaryllioideae. Within Allioideae, Tulbaghieae was sister to Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae whereas Allieae was sister to the clade of Tulbaghieae‑ Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae. Molecular dating analyses revealed the crown age of Allioideae in the Eocene (40.1 mya) followed by diferentiation of Allieae in the early Miocene (21.3 mya). The split of Gilliesieae from Leucocoryneae was estimated at 16.5 mya.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio 308-Course Guide
    COURSE GUIDE BIO 308 BIOGEOGRAPHY Course Team Dr. Kelechi L. Njoku (Course Developer/Writer) Professor A. Adebanjo (Programme Leader)- NOUN Abiodun E. Adams (Course Coordinator)-NOUN NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA BIO 308 COURSE GUIDE National Open University of Nigeria Headquarters 14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way Victoria Island Lagos Abuja Office No. 5 Dar es Salaam Street Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse II, Abuja e-mail: [email protected] URL: www.nou.edu.ng Published by National Open University of Nigeria Printed 2013 ISBN: 978-058-434-X All Rights Reserved Printed by: ii BIO 308 COURSE GUIDE CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ……………………………………......................... iv What you will Learn from this Course …………………............ iv Course Aims ……………………………………………............ iv Course Objectives …………………………………………....... iv Working through this Course …………………………….......... v Course Materials ………………………………………….......... v Study Units ………………………………………………......... v Textbooks and References ………………………………........... vi Assessment ……………………………………………….......... vi End of Course Examination and Grading..................................... vi Course Marking Scheme................................................................ vii Presentation Schedule.................................................................... vii Tutor-Marked Assignment ……………………………….......... vii Tutors and Tutorials....................................................................... viii iii BIO 308 COURSE GUIDE INTRODUCTION BIO 308: Biogeography is a one-semester, 2 credit- hour course in Biology. It is a 300 level, second semester undergraduate course offered to students admitted in the School of Science and Technology, School of Education who are offering Biology or related programmes. The course guide tells you briefly what the course is all about, what course materials you will be using and how you can work your way through these materials. It gives you some guidance on your Tutor- Marked Assignments. There are Self-Assessment Exercises within the body of a unit and/or at the end of each unit.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 History of Vitaceae Inferred from Morphology-Based
    HISTORY OF VITACEAE INFERRED FROM MORPHOLOGY-BASED PHYLOGENY AND THE FOSSIL RECORD OF SEEDS By IJU CHEN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Iju Chen 2 To my parents and my sisters, 2-, 3-, 4-ju 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Dr. Steven Manchester for providing the important fossil information, sharing the beautiful images of the fossils, and reviewing the dissertation. I thank Dr. Walter Judd for providing valuable discussion. I thank Dr. Hongshan Wang, Dr. Dario de Franceschi, Dr. Mary Dettmann, and Dr. Peta Hayes for access to the paleobotanical specimens in museum collections, Dr. Kent Perkins for arranging the herbarium loans, Dr. Suhua Shi for arranging the field trip in China, and Dr. Betsy R. Jackes for lending extant Australian vitaceous seeds and arranging the field trip in Australia. This research is partially supported by National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants award number 0608342. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................11 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • A Visual Guide to Collecting Plant Tissues for DNA
    A visual guide to collecting plant tissues for DNA Collecting kit checklist Silica gel1 Permanent marker and pencil Resealable bags, airtight plastic container Razor blade / Surgical scissors Empty tea bags or coffee filters Ethanol and paper tissue or ethanol wipes Tags or jewellers tags Plant press and collecting book 1. Selection and preparation of fresh plant tissue: Sampling avoided. Breaking up leaf material will bruise the plant tissue, which will result in enzymes being released From a single plant, harvest 3 – 5 mature leaves, or that cause DNA degradation. Ideally, leaf material sample a piece of a leaf, if large (Picture A). Ideally should be cut into smaller fragments with thick a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2 should be enough, but this midribs being removed (Picture C). If sampling robust amount should be adjusted if the plant material is leaf tissue (e.g. cycads, palms), use a razor blade or rich in water (e.g. a succulent plant). If leaves are surgical scissors (Picture D). small (e.g. ericoid leaves), sample enough material to equate a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2. If no leaves are Succulent plants available, other parts can be sampled such as leaf buds, flowers, bracts, seeds or even fresh bark. If the If the leaves are succulent, use a razor blade to plant is small, select the biggest specimen, but never remove epidermal slices or scoop out parenchyma combine tissues from different individuals. tissue (Picture E). Cleaning Ideally, collect clean fresh tissues, however if the leaf or plant material is dirty or shows potential contamination (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution of Deep Angiosperm Phylogeny Using Conserved Nuclear Genes and Estimates of Early Divergence Times
    ARTICLE Received 24 Mar 2014 | Accepted 11 Aug 2014 | Published 24 Sep 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5956 OPEN Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times Liping Zeng1, Qiang Zhang2, Renran Sun1, Hongzhi Kong3, Ning Zhang1,4 & Hong Ma1,5 Angiosperms are the most successful plants and support human livelihood and ecosystems. Angiosperm phylogeny is the foundation of studies of gene function and phenotypic evolution, divergence time estimation and biogeography. The relationship of the five divergent groups of the Mesangiospermae (B99.95% of extant angiosperms) remains uncertain, with multiple hypotheses reported in the literature. Here transcriptome data sets are obtained from 26 species lacking sequenced genomes, representing each of the five groups: eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllaceae. Phylogenetic analyses using 59 carefully selected low-copy nuclear genes resulted in highly supported relationships: sisterhood of eudicots and a clade containing Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllaceae, with magnoliids being the next sister group, followed by monocots. Our topology allows a re-examination of the evolutionary patterns of 110 morphological characters. The molecular clock estimates of Mesangiospermae diversification during the late to middle Jurassic correspond well to the origins of some insects, which may have been a factor facilitating early angiosperm radiation. 1 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratoryof Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Plant Biology, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Center for Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. 2 Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Vitaceae Based on Plastid Sequence Data
    PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF VITACEAE BASED ON PLASTID SEQUENCE DATA by PAUL NAUDE Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: DR. M. VAN DER BANK December 2005 I declare that this dissertation has been composed by myself and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own Paul Naude (December 2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Abstract iii Index of Figures iv Index of Tables vii Author Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements ix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Vitaceae 1 1.2 Genera of Vitaceae 6 1.2.1 Vitis 6 1.2.2 Cayratia 7 1.2.3 Cissus 8 1.2.4 Cyphostemma 9 1.2.5 Clematocissus 9 1.2.6 Ampelopsis 10 1.2.7 Ampelocissus 11 1.2.8 Parthenocissus 11 1.2.9 Rhoicissus 12 1.2.10 Tetrastigma 13 1.3 The genus Leea 13 1.4 Previous taxonomic studies on Vitaceae 14 1.5 Main objectives 18 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 21 2.1 DNA extraction and purification 21 2.2 Primer trail 21 2.3 PCR amplification 21 2.4 Cycle sequencing 22 2.5 Sequence alignment 22 2.6 Sequencing analysis 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 32 3.1 Results from primer trail 32 3.2 Statistical results 32 3.3 Plastid region results 34 3.3.1 rpL 16 34 3.3.2 accD-psa1 34 3.3.3 rbcL 34 3.3.4 trnL-F 34 3.3.5 Combined data 34 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 42 4.1 Molecular evolution 42 4.2 Morphological characters 42 4.3 Previous taxonomic studies 45 4.4 Conclusions 46 CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES 48 APPENDIX STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA 59 ii ABSTRACT Five plastid regions as source for phylogenetic information were used to investigate the relationships among ten genera of Vitaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the SE Australian Clade of Hibbertia Subg. Hemistemma (Dilleniaceae)
    Phylogeny of the SE Australian clade of Hibbertia subg. Hemistemma (Dilleniaceae) Ihsan Abdl Azez Abdul Raheem School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Adelaide June 2012 The University of Adelaide, SA, Australia Declaration I, Ihsan Abdl Azez Abdul Raheem certify that this work contains no materials which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any universities or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no materials previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australian Digital Thesis Program (ADTP) and also through web search engine, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. ii This thesis is dedicated to my loving family and parents iii Acknowledgments The teacher who is indeed wise does not bid you to enter the house of his wisdom but rather leads you to the threshold of your mind--Khalil Gibran First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisors Dr John G. Conran, Dr Terry Macfarlane and Dr Kevin Thiele for their support, encouragement, valuable feedback and assistance over the past three years (data analyses and writing) guiding me through my PhD candidature.
    [Show full text]