COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS

topics. To name a few: the mathematical laws that relate growth, flight and locomotion to mass and size (a topic currently experiencing a renaissance); the shapes of cells, bubbles and soap films; geometrical compartmen­ talization and honeycombs; ; banded minerals; the intricate shells of molluscs and of the minuscule protozoan radiolar­ ians; antlers and horns; plant shapes; bone

microstructure; skeletal mechanics; and the UNLIMITED/SPL TAYLOR/VISUALS GEORGE morphological comparison of . The book’s central motif is the logarithmic , which appears on the plaque com­ memorating Thompson’s former residence in St Andrews. He saw it first in foramini­ fera, and again in seashells, horns and claws, insect flight paths and the arrangement of leaves in some plants. This, to Thompson, was evidence of the universality of form and the reduction of diverse phenomena to a few mathematical governing principles. How much influence did On Growth and Form have? Evolutionary and developmen­ tal biologists often genuflect to Thompson’s breadth and imagination while remaining sceptical that he told us much of lasting value. Thompson was reacting against the Dar­ winism of his age, whereby, in its first flush IN RETROSPECT of enthusiasm, it seemed adequate to account for every feature with a plea to . Thompson’s insistence that biological form had to make sense in engineering terms was On Growth and Form a necessary reminder. But it did not challenge the idea that was ’s Philip Ball celebrates a classic work on the scalpel — it merely imposed constraints on the forms that might emerge. When he sent that shape living structures, from antlers to cells. the manuscript of On Growth and Form to his publisher, Thompson wrote: “where it undoubtedly runs counter to conventional ike Newton’s Principia, D’Arcy Went­ Thompson’s route On Growth and , I do not rub this in, but leave the worth Thompson’s On Growth and to this view was, like Form reader to draw the obvious moral for himself.” Form is a book more often name- the man himself, idi­ D’ARCY WENTWORTH Thompson believed that evolution could Lchecked than read. Both are hefty — osyncratic. The son of THOMPSON sometimes advance in a leap rather than a Cambridge University Thompson’s revised edition in 1942 weighed a Cambridge classicist, Press: 1917. shuffle — still a hotly discussed issue. And the in at more than 1,000 pages, to the alarm of he went to Edinburgh debate that Thompson tried to initiate about Cambridge University Press. to study medicine but switched to zoology contingency versus necessity in biological And both books stand apart from their at Cambridge — the same trajectory as form has not yet really been engaged. There age. Each contains ideas ahead of its time, Darwin. There he supplemented his income are still biologists who believe that almost yet seems rooted in earlier traditions. First by teaching Greek. He returned to Scotland every feature of an organism must be adap­ published in 1917, with the modern synthe­ as (in effect) a marine biologist at the Uni­ tive. There are still open questions about how sis of neo-Darwinian two or three versity of Dundee before moving a few miles deterministic the course of evolution is. decades away and genes still a nascent con­ down the North Sea coast to the University This is one reason to keep On Growth and cept, On Growth and Form looked in some of St Andrews, where he occupied the Chair Form in the canon. Another is the modern ways archaic by the time the second edition of Natural History. appreciation of self-organization as a means appeared — yet it continues to inspire. His frustration at the ‘Just So’ explanations of developing complex form and pattern from Thompson’s agenda is captured in the of offered by Darwinians burst simple physical rules — evident, for example, book’s epigraph from statistician Karl out in a 1894 paper presented at the British in patterns, animal swarming and per­ Pearson (first published in this journal in Association meeting; he argued that physical haps even the subtle regularities of human 1901): “I believe the day must come when forces, not heredity, may govern biological society. Here Thompson is not as easy to enlist the biologist will — without being a mathe­ form. as a prophet as one might expect. matician — not hesitate to use mathematical On Growth and Form elaborates at length Many of the systems he looked at, such analysis when he requires it.” Thompson pre­ on this theme. “In general no organic forms as the striped markings of animals, and the sents mathematical principles as a shaping exist save such as are in conformity with formation of polygonal crack networks, are agency that may supersede natural selection, physical and mathematical laws,” he wrote. now recognized as paradigmatic examples showing how the structures of the living Thompson’s demonstration of this claim of spontaneous self-organization in com­ world often echo those in inorganic nature. takes him through a formidable range of plex systems. But Thompson often gives

32 | NATURE | VOL 494 | 7 FEBRUARY 2013 © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT such things only a glancing mention while either confessing that he has no real expla­ nation or assuming that it must be a simple Books in brief one. He says of the chemical precipitation patterns called Liesegang rings, “For a dis­ Anatomies: The Human Body, Its Parts and the Stories They Tell cussion of the raison d’être of this phenom­ Hugh Aldersey-Williams Viking 320 pp. £18.99 (2013) enon, the student will consult the textbooks How comfortable are we with our corporeal selves? Hugh Aldersey- of physical and colloid .” The stu­ Williams, whose best-seller on the periodic table eulogized the dent would have found little there in 1917, elements, here turns a cultivated eye to the body eclectic, limbs, and some aspects of this chemistry are still liver, lungs and all. He roves from Rembrandt’s The Anatomy Lesson being clarified. of Dr Nicolaes Tulp (1632) — with its intent crowd of medics round The The tradition from a pallid corpse — to his own observations of cadavers and their logarithmic which Thompson’s nested organs, so distinct in hue, density and texture. A seething spiral was, to great work emerged melange of science and culture follows: the iconic status of the nose, Thompson, was rather different the shapeliness of kidneys, extreme longevity and much more. evidence of the from the early inter­ universality of est in complex sys­ form. tems by the likes of Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone Henri Poincaré: it was Jon Agar Icon Books 288 pp. £12.99 (2013) indebted to the biophysics and biomechan­ In this update to his 2003 history of the mobile phone, science and ics of anatomists such as Wilhelm His and technology historian Jon Agar reassesses the ever-evolving nature Wilhelm Roux. It is probably this strand that of this multitasking machine clamped to the ears of billions. Agar ties Thompson most securely to the present, reports on the developments with characteristically clear precision. for much of cell biology now centres on how His four-part chronicle deconstructs a typical mobile phone; traces the mechanics of cell structures determine its genesis and evolution, touching on regional differences; dives the fates, forms and functions of tissues. This into the cultures embracing it, from phone-hacking journalists to undervalued aspect of biophysics is becom­ African farmers; and, weaving in Apple’s part in the story, ends with ing more integrated into the rest of molecu­ a bang at the smartphone. lar biology, as we come to realize how much mesoscale mechanics modulates gene and protein behaviour. Mating Intelligence Unleashed: The Role of the Mind in Sex, But much of the admiration for On Dating, and Love Growth and Form expressed by fans such as Glenn Geher and Scott Barry Kaufman Oxford University Press and Stephen Jay Gould stems 320 pp. $27.95 (2013) from a more general consideration: Thomp­ Human courtship is as convoluted as the human mind. In son’s breadth of scholarship, coupled to the generating and maintaining relationships we can be master elegance of his writing. He was a classicist tacticians, deploying everything from humour and compassion as well as a scientist (the many Greek and to bling and ‘bad boy’ displays. It is this nexus of intelligence and Latin quotes in On Growth and Form pass mating that psychologists Glenn Geher and Scott Barry Kaufman untranslated), and there is something of the explore in this lively, copiously researched treatise on the roles of antiquarian in his persona. At a time when factors from creativity to biases and emotional intelligence. science was succumbing to the specialization that has now become something of a liabil­ ity, Thompson showed the value of synoptic Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly Power in thinkers who are prepared to risk being quite the New Gilded Age wrong here and there for the sake of an inspi­ Susan Crawford Yale University Press 256 pp. £20 (2013) rational vision. Like the modern mavericks The United States may be a pioneer of digitization but, says James Lovelock, , Gould Susan Crawford, it has lost its early lead in broadband pricing and and Stephen Wolfram, he presented his ideas speed — and, in turn, Internet access. In her history-cum-analysis, in an extended, almost incontinent, gush, telecommunications policy specialist Crawford avers that many US rather than with a conventional succession citizens pay significantly more than their counterparts elsewhere; of closely argued papers. and whereas more than half of South Korean households have fast Such figures excite strong responses. They fibre lines, the US figure is just 7%. With monopolies running US are sometimes exasperating. But we must cable companies, it is time, she argues, for government regulation. make sure that they do not — in an age of Big Science, citation-counting, tenure bat­ tles and funding crises — become extinct. ■ Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People Mahzarin R. Banaji and Anthony G. Greenwald Delacorte 272 pp. $27 Philip Ball is a writer based in London. (2013) e-mail: [email protected] Unconscious biases that guide behaviour act like retinal blindspots — even blindsight, in which people with brain damage can grab an The D’Arcy Thompson Zoology Museum at the University of Dundee, UK, is currently displaying object without consciously seeing it. So say psychologists Mahzarin the first works acquired through a grant from the Banaji and Anthony Greenwald, arguing that such quirks can trump Art Fund to build a collection of art inspired by ethical intent owing to that may have been evolutionarily Thompson’s work. A special issue of Interdisciplinary Science Reviews on D’Arcy Thompson and his advantageous. Starting with perceptual mistakes based on habits of legacy will be published in March 2013. thought (mindbugs), they cover psychological self-trickery in depth.

7 FEBRUARY 2013 | VOL 494 | NATURE | 33 © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved