DOCSLIB.ORG

Prezident 21 Online Game

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prezident 21 Online Game Prezident 21 Online Game Report on the application of Janeček Method (D21) Table of contents List of Figures 3 Executive Summary 5 About the Institute H21 6 About the Janeček Method 7 General Context 9 Political System 9 Presidential Election System 12 2018 Presidential Election 14 Candidates 14 Mirek Topolánek 14 Michal Horáček 15 Pavel Fischer 15 Jiří Hynek 16 Petr Hannig 17 Vratislav Kulhánek 17 Miloš Zeman 18 Marek Hilšer 19 Jiří Drahoš 19 Pre-election Polls 20 Official Election Results 21 Prezident 21 Online Game 24 Main objectives 24 Implementation and Procedure 24 Data Collection and Processing 26 Population Sample 27 Prezident 21 Outcomes and Main Findings 28 Results 28 Voting Behaviour 30 Conclusion 40 References 42 2 List of Figures Figure 1: Polling Numbers of Candidates by Czech Public Television Figure 2: Polling Numbers of Candidates by Kdovyhrajevolby Figure 3: Czech Presidential election 2018 Participants and Results - First round Figure 4: Czech Presidential election 2018 Participants and Results - Second round Figure 5: Official results of the Czech Presidential election 2018 Participants and Results Figure 6: Prezident 21 Online Game, Results of the Second Phase of Prezident 21 Figure 7: Prezident 21 Online Game, Distribution of Plus and Minus Votes under the Janeček Method Figure 8: Prezident 21 Online Game, Results under 3 plus votes Figure 9: Prezident 21 Online Game, Vote Structure Figure 10: Prezident 21 Online Game, Voting Pattern based on the preferred Candidate Figure 11: Prezident 21 Online Game, Vote Distribution based on Age Figure 12: Prezident 21 Online Game, Voting behaviour based on the Level of Education of Voters Figure 13: Prezident 21 Online Game, Voting Pattern among Different Political Party Supporters Figure 14: Prezident 21 Online Game, Voting Pattern based on the Gender of voters Figure 15: Prezident 21 Online Game, Vote Distribution based on the Age of Voters Figure 16: Prezident 21 Online Game, Voting Distribution based on the Education Level of Voters 3 Figure 17: Prezident 21 Online Game, Vote Distribution Based on the Size of voters’ Residence Figure 18: Prezident 21 Online Game, Vote Distribution Based on the Salary Level of Voters 4 Executive Summary The Prezident 21 Online Game, (P21) ran between December 2016 and January 2018. In this game, the public could vote for the 2018 presidential candidates in the Czech Republic on the interactive website via a real-time, online voting tool, using the Janeček Method (D21), a voting method developed by Dr. Karel Janeček, a Czech mathematician and entrepreneur. Anyone who wished to participate could vote online, using up to three Plus votes and one Minus vote distributed across nine candidates. The P21 was executed and managed by the Institute H21 (at the time of the project called Institute for Democracy 21), a Prague-based non-profit organisation dedicated to enhancing civic participation through innovative solutions for public decision-making. Throughout the P21, the IH21 team visited various towns and villages in the Czech Republic to mobilise and enable voters without Internet access to participate in the P21 by providing them with necessary electronic devices. The unique features of the Janeček Method (D21) incorporated in the P21 produced a different result from that of the actual election. This report shows why, providing both a detailed explanation of the proposed alternative voting method and an in-depth analysis of the P21 results. It also describes the relevant Czech political background and the official election results. 5 About the Institute H21 The Institute H21 (IH21) is​ a non-profit organisation founded in 2016 by Dr. Karel Janeček to boost civic engagement and to bring the Janeček Method (D21), to public attention in the Czech Republic and beyond. The Prague-based IH21 is comprised of a diverse team of social innovators who believe that changes in voting systems will help restore trust in democracy and lead to more positive, just societies. During its first year, the IH21 began its research activities, led by a team of experts from around the globe. Since its inception, it conducted three large-scale studies applying the Janeček Method (D21) along with other voting methods in the 2018 Presidential and Senate elections in the Czech Republic. The Institute offers practical and innovative solutions for public​ decision-making processes run by cities, governments, political parties and non-profit organisations through its online​ platform. Over 60 municipalities across different countries have adopted the Janeček Method (D21) in their budgeting procedures. The Institute H21 has a partnership organisation in India, the Foundation for Community Consensus (FCC), which applies the Janeček Method (D21) in urban planning and rural development projects in five states. For more information visit the IH21 website: https://www.ih21.org/​ For additional data on and results of the Prezident 21, please contact the IH21 ([email protected]​ ).​ 6 About the Janeček Method The Janeček Method (D21), is a single and multiple-winner voting system proposed by​ Dr. Karel Janeček, a Czech mathematician, entrepreneur and anti-corruption campaigner. Under the Janeček Method, each voter may express approval and disapproval toward each candidate by casting Plus and Minus votes. Unlike other voting methods, the Janeček Method (D21) adds a new dimension to the non-ranked voting space by introducing two features that comprise requirement criteria for the method: 1. Systematically​ Capped Multiple Votes – this sets a ceiling for the total number of votes each voter can cast on a single ballot; 2. A 2:1 Ratio of Plus to Minus Votes – this limits the number of Minus votes allowed to no more than half of the number of Plus votes. The Janeček Method (D21) permits​ voters to cast multiple votes that are either Plus or Minus in a single ballot. Since the Janeček​ Method (D21) can be applied in elections with single as well as multiple seats to be filled, voters are given at least twice as many Plus votes as there are seats to be filled. The​ upper boundary of votes is pegged​ to the number of ballot options. The​ method’s general definition proposes to limit the total number of votes to half of the number of options. Hence, the total number of allowed votes can fluctuate based on the number of candidates. However, in practice, no more than 2(N+1) votes are recommended, where N represents the number of seats to be filled. This feature is defined as the​ systematically capped multiple votes requirements.​ 7 The Janeček​ Method (D21) also gives voters an option of expressing disapproval by casting Minus votes. However, the number of Minus votes cannot exceed half the number of Plus votes allowed. A voter is permitted to use a Minus vote only after casting at least double the number of Plus votes. The latter requirement is the second unique feature of the Janeček Method (D21)– the​ 2:1 ratio of Plus to Minus votes.​ Under the definition of the Janeček​ Method (D21),​ all votes have the same absolute weight, count equally, and do not specify preferences between them. Votes cannot be accumulated. Only one vote, Plus or Minus, per candidate is permitted. The candidate with the highest score is the winner.1 1 The score is counted based on the final number of the Plus votes deducts the final number of the Minus votes. 8 General Context The Czech Republic is a unitary​ ​parliamentary republic which has a population of approximately 10.6 million​ people and is located in Central Europe. The country in its current form came into existence after the dissolution of the Czechoslovak federation in 1993. In 1948, after a Soviet-backed communist coup, Czechoslovakia fell under a strict communist regime (Fawn, 2000). Even its own democratic reforms brought forward by the communist party leader Alexander Dubček were suppressed by the 1968 Warsaw Pact invasion; the USSR-led intervention completely prevented democratic changes in the country until communism’s fall in 1989. Since the first free elections after the fall of communism in 1990, the country has developed vigorous democratic institutions, a private sector and highly-developed market economy (Fawn, 2000). Its democratic transformation was significantly stimulated by efforts to become a member of the so-called Western political structures.2 Political System The Czech Republic has a democratic system of government based on parliamentary democracy, free competition among political parties and universal suffrage. According to the Constitution of the Czech Republic adopted in December 1992, every citizen, upon reaching the age of 18, has the right to vote (Constitutional 2 In 1999, the country successfully joined NATO followed by a membership in the European Union five years later. 9 Act No. 1/1993 Coll., Constitution of the Czech Republic, as amended - Czech Constitution, 1993, as amended, art. 1 and 18) The supreme legislative body is the Parliament, which consists of the Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of the legislature, and the Senate​ ,​ the upper house. The Chamber of Deputies, based on proportional representation, is made up of 200 Deputies serving four-year terms who are elected on party tickets by secret ballot. The Senate is comprised of 81 senators elected in individual electoral districts for six-year terms using a majority-wins system; the elections are held under a two-round system with a run-off. Every two years a third of the Senate seats are up for reelection. Therefore, in each Senate election cycle, 27 constituencies hold elections. The first round of Senate elections is held concurrently with regional or local elections (Šedo, 2016). In order to be elected into the Chamber of Deputies, a candidate must be at least 21 years of age, whereas, for the Senate, the minimum required age is 40 (Czech Constitution, 1993, as amended, art.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Masarykova Univerzita Fakulta Sociálních Studií
    Masarykova univerzita Fakulta sociálních studií Negativní kampaň v komunikaci prezidentských kandidátů na Facebooku Negative campaign in the communication of presidential candidates on Facebook Diplomová práce Bc. Tomáš Kulhánek Brno 2018 Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci Negativní kampaň v komunikaci prezidentských kandidátů na Facebooku vypracoval samostatně a použil pouze zdroje uvedené v seznamu literatury. V Hradci Králové dne 27. 5. 2018 Bc. Tomáš Kulhánek 2 Rád bych na tomto místě poděkoval Mgr. et Mgr. Aleně Mackové, Ph.D. za vedení práce, cenné rady a čas, který mi během psaní práce věnovala. Zároveň chci poděkovat svým prarodičům, bratrovi a zejména rodičům, bez jejichž neustálé podpory bych nedokázal vysokoškolské studium absolvovat. 3 Anotace Diplomová práce se zaměřuje na využití negativní kampaně v rámci obsahů facebookové komunikace kandidátů během kampaně k prezidentským volbám v roce 2018. Teoretická část práce se věnuje definici základních pojmů, které se prací prolínají – politické komunikaci ve čtvrté éře a negativní kampani s důrazem na tu probíhající na online sociální síti Facebook. Představuje také některé dosavadní výzkumy na poli online politické komunikace. V metodologické části práce definuji výzkumné otázky, hypotézy a metodu kvantitativní obsahové analýzy, kterou jsem využil v následující analýze. V práci jsem zkoumal příspěvky šesti relevantních kandidátů v období od oficiálního potvrzení jejich kandidatury ministerstvem vnitra do prvního kola voleb, u dvou finalistů až do kola druhého.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Číslo 1/2018 V
    Agreement # 40005374/ Registration # 09089 Modře označené štítky znamenají, že není zaplacené předplatné! Datum, dokdy jsou noviny Commit- We acknowledge the financial support Předplatné na jeden rok je předplaceny, je v pravém ted of the Government of Canada through horním rohu štítku! Canada Periodical Fund 28,50 + 1,50 (HST) = 30 kan. dolarů ISSN 1186-9283 (Print) J Á délai of the Department of the Canadian Heritage. Cena 2,85 + 0,15 (HST) = 3,00 dolary. ISSN 1923-1784 (Online) Time convenu ČESKOSLOVENSKÉ NOVINY - CZECHOSLOVAK NEWSPAPER No. 1. Thursday, (581.) January 18, Vol. 27. 2018 Published by ABE, P. O. Box 176, Toronto „E“, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6H 4E2 Tel.: 416/530-4222, Praha: 222-261-811; E-Mail: [email protected] satellite1-416.com — zpravy.org — zpravy.ca — spravy.ca — satellite416.com Volba prezidenta: A nový prezident nepřišel… Alespoň zatím ne! Ale na rozdíl od věčného čekání na Godota 5. Marek Hilšer 454 949 hlasů 8,83 % se zřejmě brzy dočkáme. Pokud se něco nestane, tak jméno 6. Mirek Topolánek 221 689 hlasů 4,30 % 7. Jiří Hynek 63 348 hlasů 1,23 % nové hlavy českého státu, budeme znát v sobotu odpoledne 27. 8. Petr Hannig 29 228 hlasů 0,56 % ledna 2017 a měl by to být jeden z dvojice - prezident Miloš 9. Vratislav Kulhánek 24 442 hlasů 0,47 % Zeman a vysokoškolský učitel fyzikální chemik Jiří Drahoš. Za studentských let jsme měli jedno přísloví: Kdo mlčí Takovým referendem se tedy stane i druhé kolo prezidentské je filosof. Pokud bychom se drželi tohoto pravidla pak volby v Čechách.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic: the White Paper on Defence 2011
    The White Paper on Defence The White Paper on Defence © The Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic – DCP, 2011 The White Paper of Defence was approved by the Governmental Resolution of 18th May 2011, Nr. 369. Table of Contents Foreword by the Minister of Defence 6 Foreword by the Chief of General Staff 8 Commission for the White Paper on Defence 11 Key Findings and Recommendations 12 Traditions of the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic 22 Chapter 1 Doorways to the Future 26 The Government’s Approach to National Defence Building 26 Civilian Management and Democratic Control 29 Designation of Competencies and Responsibilities for Defence 29 Political-Military Ambitions 29 Legislative Framework 31 Chapter 2 Strategic Environment 34 Background 34 Czech Security Interests 38 Security Threats and Risks 39 Chapter 3 Roles and Functions of the Czech Armed Forces 44 Roles of the Czech Armed Forces 44 Functions in the Czech National and NATO Collective Defence 44 Functions in International Cooperation 46 Functions in Supporting Civilian Bodies 47 Chapter 4 Defence Planning 52 Chapter 5 Financial Framework and Management System 56 Macroeconomic Perspective 56 Microeconomic Perspective 59 Financial Management in an Austernity Era 66 Chapter 6 Competent and Motivated People 74 People are the Priority 74 Personnel Management 79 Career Management 81 Preparation of Personnel 84 Salary and Welfare Policy 87 Chapter 7 Development of Capabilities 92 Political-Military Ambitions and Capabilities 92 Capabilities Perspective of the Armed Forces 93 Capability-Based
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Voting, Alternative Outcomes: 2018 Presidential Election in the Czech Republic
    Munich Social Science Review, New Series, vol. 3 (2020) Alternative voting, alternative outcomes: 2018 Presidential election in the Czech Republic Jan Oreský Institute H21, Zapova 1559/18, 150 00 Prague 5, [email protected] Prokop Čech Institute H21, Faculty of Social and Economic Studies J. E. Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic, [email protected] Abstract: In this paper, the official two-round system is compared to the D21- Janeček method, using representative data collected during the 2018 presidential election in the Czech Republic. Under the D21-Janeček method, voters were allowed to cast up to three plus votes, with the option of casting one minus vote for the nine presidential candidates. Because of the systematically capped multiple votes, the outcome of the Janeček method differed significantly from the actual election. Additional votes provided more information about voters’ preferences and candidates’ profiles. Here it showed that the Janeček method favours inclusive candidates who are able to attract the support from voters of other candidates, and disadvantages polarising candidates. Furthermore, the overlap of plus and minus votes reveals which candidates are most hurt by the splitting of votes under plurality voting. A relatively large overlap of plus votes between the main two contenders also suggests that the differences between them were not as big as was presented by the media. Keywords: Czech Republic, presidential election, representative study, D21- Janeček method, alternative voting system JEL Classification: D72 ; D78 ; H10 ; Z18 © 2020 Verlag Holler, München. ISSN 0170-2521 ISBN 978-3-88278-312-4 www.accedoverlag.de 114 Munich Social Science Review, New Series, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shape of The
    2017 Aspen Annual Conference The Shape of the Nov 29 2017 #AspenAnnual2017 Contents Foreword 5 Program 6 Speakers 8 Economy and Competitiveness 24 Quality of Governance 27 Education 29 National Security and Resilience 32 Quality of Life 35 Foreword We are doing well, but could be doing far better. How do we stack up against our closest neighbors? Who should we compare ourselves to? We will be meeting for the third time this year in order to address questions about the development of our society. The Shape of the Czech Republic conference followed up on the Czech Republic: The Shape We’re In project which the Aspen Institute launched in 2015 and which sought to map the country’s status in various areas based on available data and international comparisons. The conferences last year and the year before that successfully ofered a number of answers to the question of why the Czech Republic fares poorly in comparison with similar countries and what can be done about it. The starting point was the attempt to place various aspects subject to international comparison into broader contexts: economic competitiveness, education, the functioning of public institutions, the quality of life and security. This year’s conference on the Czech Republic is connected to an international conference entitled The Shape of (Central) Europe, which allows us to examine the local situation in the context of contemporary Europe. Our thanks go to everyone who took part in the working groups, in particular their coordinators, who drafted the reports contained in this booklet. This is not an academic study intended for specialists, but material for public discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in CZECH REPUBLIC 12Th-13Th and 26Th-27Th January 2018
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN CZECH REPUBLIC 12th-13th and 26th-27th January 2018 European Milos Zeman manages to stay as President Elections monitor of the Czech Republic Corinne Deloy On 27th January the Czechs finally re-elected outgoing head of State Milos Zeman (Citizens Rights Party, SPOZ). With 51.36% of the vote he won against Jiri Drahos (independent) who won 48.63% of the vote. Milos Zeman easily won the first round of voting on 12th and 13thJanuary last with 38.56% of the vote ahead of Jiri Drahos, who won 26.6% Results 2nd round Two-thirds of the Czechs turned out to ballot for the second round, with round of the previous presidential election on 25th and 26th January 2013. turnout totalling 66.6% i.e. +7.49 points in comparison with the second Presidential election results on 12th and 13th January and 26th -27th January 2018 in the Czech Republic Turnout: 61.92% (1st round) and 66.6% (2nd round) No. of votes % of votes No. of votes % of votes Candidates won won won won (1st round) (1st round) (2nd round) (2nd round) Milos Zeman (Citizens’ Rights Party, SPOZ) 1 985 547 38.56 2 853 390 51.36 Jiri Drahos (independent) 1 369 601 26.60 2 701 206 48.63 Pavel Fischer (independent) 526 694 10.23 Michal Horacek (independent) 472 643 9.18 Marek Hilser (independent) 454 949 8.83 Mirek Topolanek (independent) 221 689 4.30 Jiri Hynek (independent) 63 348 1.23 Petr Hannig (Common Sense Party) 29 228 0.56 Vratislav Kukhanec (independent) 24 442 0.47 Source : https://www.volby.cz/pls/prez2018/pe2?xjazyk=CZ “The trust of the Czech citizens will give me energy over the next “Milos Zeman clearly promoted his anti-immigration stance, which five years and I am convinced that they will not be disappointed,” helped him win the presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the Czech Tales on European Policies
    PRAGUE TRANSATLANTIC TALKS 2013 NATO in Afghanistan and Beyond: Search for a Mission, Quest for Capabilities International roundtable conference organized by the Association for International Affairs (AMO) with the kind support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic and NATO Public Diplomacy Division. Under the auspices of H. E. Karel Schwarzenberg, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic. Wednesday, 24 April 2013 Mirror Hall, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic, Loretánské náměstí 5, Prague, Czech Republic 1 Conference Synopsis Even though the threat of a conventional attack ceased to be a major security concern for the Euro-Atlantic community with the end of the Cold War, the need for keeping and developing up-to-date, modern military capabilities remains at the top of NATO’s agenda. The experience of ethnic warfare in the Balkans and, even more so, the operations which followed the 9/11 attacks, along with other, less prominent contingencies, highlighted the need for the development of a new type of military forces: deployable, capable of rapid reaction, flexible and versatile. However, the allocation of resources necessary to accomplish this task has been a constant challenge for the Alliance’s member states’ governments. Military spending became largely unpopular among general public after the end of Cold War, especially in Europe, and even the shocks of the ‘new wars’ after 1990 or the terrorist attacks of 2001 did not reverse this trend. The current economic crisis accompanied by vast cuts in social welfare made the financial means spent for the purpose of enhancing military capabilities even more unjustifiable in the eyes of the public.
    [Show full text]
  • JOINT STATEMENT on SITUATION in GEORGIA February, 26, 2021
    JOINT STATEMENT ON SITUATION IN GEORGIA February, 26, 2021 Prague, Warsaw, Riga, Washington DC, Tallinn, Vilnius, Berlin, London The storming of the office of the United National Movement, the largest opposition party in Georgia, in order to arrest Nika Melia, its Chairman, exposed the fragility of democracy and freedom in Georgia. Violence is incompatible with the stated aspirations of the Georgian Government and contravenes the 8 March 2020 Agreement between the government and opposition and facilitated by ambassadors of the European Union and the United States in Tbilisi. We call on the Georgians to come together to find political solutions to the problems we have seen emerge in recent years and not to resort to the tactics we have seen practiced by others to the detriment of the interests of the Georgian people. The destabilising and antidemocratic actions, starting after the parliamentary election and continuing until most recently, highlight the personal responsibility of all those in positions of power to exercise restraint and the consequences for the whole nation for those who do not. Georgia’s place as a free member of the European family is not in doubt but is put in danger by the violence and assaults on freedom. Mr. Pavel Fischer Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Security Senate of the Czech Republic Mr Marek Kuchciński Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee Sejm of the Republic of Poland Mr. Rihards Kols Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee The Saeima of the Republic of Latvia Mr. Robert Menendez Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations Senate of the United States of America Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Paper on Defence the White Paper on Defence
    The White Paper on Defence The White Paper on Defence © The Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic – DCP, 2011 The White Paper of Defence was approved by the Governmental Resolution of 18th May 2011, Nr. 369. Table of Contents Foreword by the Minister of Defence 6 Foreword by the Chief of General Staff 8 Commission for the White Paper on Defence 11 Key Findings and Recommendations 12 Traditions of the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic 22 Chapter 1 Doorways to the Future 26 The Government’s Approach to National Defence Building 26 Civilian Management and Democratic Control 29 Designation of Competencies and Responsibilities for Defence 29 Political-Military Ambitions 29 Legislative Framework 31 Chapter 2 Strategic Environment 34 Background 34 Czech Security Interests 38 Security Threats and Risks 39 Chapter 3 Roles and Functions of the Czech Armed Forces 44 Roles of the Czech Armed Forces 44 Functions in the Czech National and NATO Collective Defence 44 Functions in International Cooperation 46 Functions in Supporting Civilian Bodies 47 Chapter 4 Defence Planning 52 Chapter 5 Financial Framework and Management System 56 Macroeconomic Perspective 56 Microeconomic Perspective 59 Financial Management in an Austernity Era 66 Chapter 6 Competent and Motivated People 74 People are the Priority 74 Personnel Management 79 Career Management 81 Preparation of Personnel 84 Salary and Welfare Policy 87 Chapter 7 Development of Capabilities 92 Political-Military Ambitions and Capabilities 92 Capabilities Perspective of the Armed Forces 93 Capability-Based
    [Show full text]
  • The Václav Havel Library Annual Report 2013
    THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORT 2013 1 Published in 2014 by the charity the Václav Havel Library registered at the Municipal Court in Prague, file O 338 dated 26 July 2004 Statutory representative: Marta Smolíková Address: Kateřinská 18, 128 00 Prague 2 IČO 27169413 / DIČ CZ 27169413 BANK ACCOUNTS: 7077 7077/0300 CZK; IBAN: CZ61 0300 0000 0000 7077 7077 7755 7755/0300 EUR; IBAN: CZ40 0300 0000 0000 7755 7755 7747 7747/0300 USD; IBAN: CZ66 0300 0000 0000 7747 7747 SWIFT CODE: CEKO CZPP EVENTS & EXHIBITIONS Řetězová 7, 110 00 Prague 1 Galerie Montmartre Opening hours: Tues.–Sun., 12:00 to 18:00 LIBRARY & ARCHIVE Kateřinská 18, 128 00 Prague 2 Tel.: (+420) 222 220 112 info@Václavhavel-library.org The Václav Havel Library is registered at Ministry of Culture, registration No. 6343/2007 www.Vaclavhavel-library.org www.facebook.com/KnihovnaVaclavaHavla www.facebook.com/VáclavHavelLibrary www.youtube.com/user/knihovnaVaclavahavla 2 IT ONLY MAKES SENSE AS A LIVING OR VITAL ORGANISM THAT OCCUPIES A PLACE THAT CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED IN OVERALL PUBLIC and political life. […] the library MUST IN SOME WAY BE ORIGINAL AS SUCH, IN ITSELF, IN ITS EVERYDAY NATURE, AS A PERMANENTLY EXISTING PHENOMENON OR PLACE. VÁCLAV HAVEL, A FEW SENTENCES ON THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY, Hrádeček 3 CONTENTS MISSION OF THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY . 06 A WORD FROM THE DIRECTOR: ON THE PATH TO INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION . 07 STATUTORY BODIES OF THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY . 10 THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY . 12 DOCUMENTATION CENTRE . 13 RESEARCH AND CONFERENCES . 17 PUBLISHING ACTIVITIES . 21 EDUCATION . 27 VÁCLAV HAVEL – CZECH MYTH, OR HAVEL IN A NUTSHELL .
    [Show full text]