DOCSLIB.ORG

Plant Introductions N.E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Agricultural Bulletins Experiment Station 5-1-1927 Plant Introductions N.E. Hansen Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins Recommended Citation Hansen, N.E., "Plant Introductions" (1927). Bulletins. Paper 224. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins/224 This Bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDEX Pa1re Paire Adno Apple --------------------------- 8 Kahinta Plum ----------------------- 23 Alexis Crabapple ---------------------- 8 Kamdesa S. C. Hybrid _________________ 28 Amdo Rose -------------------------- 50 Kana Gooseberry --------------------- 44 Amur Crabapple --------------------- 8 Kanega Gooseberry ------------------- 44 Anoka Apple ------------------------ 9 Kapoza Gooseberry ------------------ 44 Arika.ra Grape ----------------------- 39 Kataga Gooseberry ------------------ 44 Assiniboin Plum --------------------- 20 Kawanka Gooseberry ----------------- 44 Atkan Grape ------------------------ 39 Kaw Plum -------------------------- 23 Atta Currant ------------------------ 45 Kazonta Gooseberry ------------------ 44 Azita Grape ------------------------- 3� Keza Gooseberry --------------------- 44 Beauty Crabapple -------------------- 10 Kiowa Plum ------------------------- 23 Bismer Apple ------------------------ 10 Kitana Rose ------------------------- 51 Blue Larkspur, Semipal. _______________ 55 Kola Wild Crabapple__________________ IP Boughen Sweet Chokecherry___________ 48 Kopa Gooseberry --------------------- 44 Caddo Grape ------------------------- 39 Koza Rose --------------------------- 51 Caragana ---------------------------- 54 Lachala Grape ----------------------- 89 Caramel Apple ------------------------ 10 L. Baikal Sib. Bird Cherry____________ 48 Cathay Crabapple -------------------- 10 Lathyrus tuberosus, Sib._______________ 56 Champa Sand Cherry Hybrid __________ 20 Lavatera. Thuringiaca_________________ 56 Chance Apple ------------------------ 11 Lemon Apple ------------------------ 13 Chang Pear ------------------------- 86 Linda Sweet Crabapple _______________ 13 Chee Grass -------------------------- 63 Littleleaf Pea Shrub __________________ 54 Cheresoto S. C. Hybrid---------------- 20 Luza Grape -------------------------- 39 Cherno Alfalfa ----------------------- 59 Malakoff Sweet Corn _________________ 47 Chinook Apple ----------------------- 11 Maga Crabapple ---------------------- 14 Chonkee Grape ---------------------- 89 Manchu Walnut --------------------- 49 Chontay Grape ------- --------------- 89 'Manchl1rian Crab Sdlgs.______________ 14 Cikana Sand Cherry Hybrid ___________ 21 Manchurian Muskmelon -------------- 47 Cistena Purple S. C·------------------ 21 Mandan Grape ----------------------- 39 Cossack Alfalfa. ---------------------- 58 Manitoba Hazlenut ----------------�-- 154 Cree Plum --------------------------- 21 Manota Grape ----------------------- 40 Daghestan Yel. Clover----------------- 62 Mato Currant ----------------------- 45 Dolgo Crabapple --------------------- 11 May Day Tree ----------------------- 48 Edapa Grape ------------------------ 39 Melilotus dentatus, Sib. --------------- 62 Ekta Rose --------------------------- 50 Melilotus officinalis, S. _______________ 62 Elta Apple --------------------------- 11 Mercer Wild Crabapple --------------- 14 Emana Grape ------------------------ 39 Ming Pear -------------------------- 33 Enopa Sand Cherry Hybrid ___________ 21 Minisa Rose ------------------------- 51 Eona Grape ------------------------- 89 Missouri Wild Crabapple ------------- 14 Etopa Sand Cherry Hybrid ____________ 21 Moonbeam Raspberry ----------------- 42 Eyami Sand Cherry Hybrid___________ 22 Moscow Cherry ----------------------- 31 Ezaptan S. C. Hybrid _________________ 22 Mrs. Mina Lindell Rose_______________ 51 Fewthorn R�berry ------------------ 42 Mugden Pear ------------------------ 38 Giant "';{ild Cti..L::n>le_______________ __ 11 Muskmelon, Hansen S. No. L __________ 47 l'robi Desert Alfalfa----------�-------- 61 Muskmelon, Hansen S. No. 2___________ 47 Gogol Pear -------------------------- 33 Muskmelon, Hansen S. No. 3 __________ 47 Goldo Apple ------------------------- 12 Napka Grape ------------------------- 40 Gooseberry, Wild, S. D---------------- 43 Nertchinsk Sib. Crabs ---------------- 14 Hanska Plum ------------------------ 22 Nevis, Minn. Hazlenut_________________ 154 Hansen's H. Alfalfa No. L------------ 59 New Duchess Apple ___________________ 15 Hansen's H. Alfalfa No. 2------------- 59 New Ulm Black Walnut ------------- 49 Hansen's Mongolian Wheat___________ 64 Niobe Weeping Willow________________ 4!i Hansen Sib. Sweet Clover _____________ 62 Nocalyx Crabapple ------------------- 15 Hansen S. Turkestan Alf._____________ 61 Nompah Grape ----------------------- 40 Hansen's Turkestan Radish ___________ 48 North Sweden Alfalfa _________________ 61 Hansen White-Fl. Alfalfa_____________ 59 Obb Siberia Alfalfa ___________________ 61 Hansen Whiteseed Alfalfa____________ 60 Oglala Grape ------------------------ 40 Harbin Pear ------------------------- 36 Ohta Raspberry ---------- ------------ 42 Hansen White Sib. Proso _____________ 62 Ojibwa Plum ------------------------ 23 Hibkee Apple ------------------------ 12 Oka Sand Cherry Hybrid ______________ 23 Honeysuckle Hedges ----------------- 55 Okaga Rose -------------------------- 51 Hopa Red-Flower Crab ________________ 12 iya Sand Cherry Hybrid _____________ 24 Huya Plum -------------------------- 22 8-fga Crabapple ---------------------- 15 Inkpa Plum -------------------------- 22 Omsk Siberia Alfalfa ----------------- 61 Into Crabapple ----------------------- 13 Onaka Grape ------------------------ 4(1 Irkutsk Sib. Crab Sdlgs._______________ 13 Opata Sand Cherry Hybrid____________ 24 Ivan Crabapple ---------------------- 13 Osbu Grape -------------------------- 40 Izo Crabapple ----------------------- 13 Owanka Sand Cherry Hybrid__________ 24 Kabu Gooseberry --------------------- 44 Oxbo Apple -------------------------- 15 Kaduza Gooseberry ------------------- 44 Oziya Sand Cherry Hybrid____________ 24 Kaga Plum -------------------------- 22 :Pears, N.E.H. Nos. 1-38 _______________ 32 4 BULLETIN 224 INDEX-Continued Page Page Pembina Plum ----------------------- 25 Sugar Crabapple -------------------- 16 Phleum Boehmeri, Sib. --------------- 64 Sunbeam Raspberry ------------------ 43 Pontigo Grape ----------------------- 40 Sungari Grape -----·------------------ 41 Pushkin Pear ------------------------ 34 Sunset Gooseberry -------------------- 44 Pyrus Ovoidea Pear------------------- 35 Tahama Grape ---------------------- 40 Pyrus Ussuriensis -------------------- 35 Tartarian Maple --------------------- 49 Red Tip Crabapple ____________________ 15 Tawena Plum ----------------------- 27 Ree Grape __ -·------------------------ 40 Tecumseh Plum --------------------- 27 · Rosa Rugosa, Siberian ________________ 51 Tegala Rose ------------------------- 52 Roses for Parks ______________________ 53 Teopa Grape ------------------------- 41 Russian Artemisia -------------------- 55 Teton Beauty Rose____________________ 52 Russian Sand Pear---.---------------- 36 Teton Plum ------------------------- 27 Russian Silver Lf. Willow------------- 49 Tetonkaha Rose ---------------------- 52 Russian White Apple__________________ 15 Tipi Wild Crabapple __________________ 16 Salix viminalis Regelis________________ 50 Toka Plum --------------------------- 2'1 Samara Alfalfa ---------------------- 61 Tokata Plum ------------------------- 28 Samara Perennial Clover-------------- 64 Tokeya S. C. Hybrid __________________ 28 Sansoto S. C. Hybrid_________________ 25 Tolstoy Pear ------------------------- 34 Santee Grape ------------------------ 40 Tomahawk Sand Cherry ______________ 2f Sapa Sand Cherry Hybrid _____________ 26 Tom Thumb S. C. Hybrid _____________ 2E' Sapinia Crabapple -------------------- 15 Tonah Currant ----------------------- 45 Saponsky Pear ----------------------- 35 Topa Plum --------------------------- 2£ Sasha Apple ------------------------- 16 Toringo Crabapple ------------------- 16 Semipalatinsk Honeysuckle ----------- 5E Toscha Grape ----------------------- Semi Rose --------------------------- 52 Twilight Raspberry ------------------- 42.41 Sereda Apple ------------------------ 16 Ural Willow ------------------------- 50 Shakoka Grape ----------------------- 40 Wachampa S. C. Hybrid _______________ 29 Shoko Wild Crabapple_________________ 16 Wachepa Grape ---------------------- 41 Siberian Almond -------------------- 53 Wakapa S. C. Hybrid________________ 29 Siberian Basket Willow -------------- 49 Wakpala Grape ---------------------- Siberian Black Currant_ ______________ 45 Waneta Plum ------------------------ 2941 Siberian Buckthorn ------------------ 54 Wastesa Plum ----------------------- 3fl Siberian Esparsette ------------------ 64 Watermelon, s_ D. No. !_ _____________ 46 Siberian Larkspur -------------------- 55 Watermelon, Hansen S. No. !_
Recommended publications
  • Apples Catalogue 2019

    Apples Catalogue 2019

    ADAMS PEARMAIN Herefordshire, England 1862 Oct 15 Nov Mar 14 Adams Pearmain is a an old-fashioned late dessert apple, one of the most popular varieties in Victorian England. It has an attractive 'pearmain' shape. This is a fairly dry apple - which is perhaps not regarded as a desirable attribute today. In spite of this it is actually a very enjoyable apple, with a rich aromatic flavour which in apple terms is usually described as Although it had 'shelf appeal' for the Victorian housewife, its autumnal colouring is probably too subdued to compete with the bright young things of the modern supermarket shelves. Perhaps this is part of its appeal; it recalls a bygone era where subtlety of flavour was appreciated - a lovely apple to savour in front of an open fire on a cold winter's day. Tree hardy. Does will in all soils, even clay. AERLIE RED FLESH (Hidden Rose, Mountain Rose) California 1930’s 19 20 20 Cook Oct 20 15 An amazing red fleshed apple, discovered in Aerlie, Oregon, which may be the best of all red fleshed varieties and indeed would be an outstandingly delicious apple no matter what color the flesh is. A choice seedling, Aerlie Red Flesh has a beautiful yellow skin with pale whitish dots, but it is inside that it excels. Deep rose red flesh, juicy, crisp, hard, sugary and richly flavored, ripening late (October) and keeping throughout the winter. The late Conrad Gemmer, an astute observer of apples with 500 varieties in his collection, rated Hidden Rose an outstanding variety of top quality.
  • Add a Tuber to the Pod: on Edible Tuberous Legumes

    Add a Tuber to the Pod: on Edible Tuberous Legumes

    LEGUME PERSPECTIVES Add a tuber to the pod: on edible tuberous legumes The journal of the International Legume Society Issue 19 • November 2020 IMPRESSUM ISSN Publishing Director 2340-1559 (electronic issue) Diego Rubiales CSIC, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture Quarterly publication Córdoba, Spain January, April, July and October [email protected] (additional issues possible) Editor-in-Chief Published by M. Carlota Vaz Patto International Legume Society (ILS) Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier Co-published by (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) CSIC, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, Córdoba, Spain Oeiras, Portugal Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier [email protected] (Universidade Nova de Lisboa), Oeiras, Portugal Technical Editor Office and subscriptions José Ricardo Parreira Salvado CSIC, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier International Legume Society (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) Apdo. 4084, 14080 Córdoba, Spain Oeiras, Portugal Phone: +34957499215 • Fax: +34957499252 [email protected] [email protected] Legume Perspectives Design Front cover: Aleksandar Mikić Ahipa (Pachyrhizus ahipa) plant at harvest, [email protected] showing pods and tubers. Photo courtesy E.O. Leidi. Assistant Editors Svetlana Vujic Ramakrishnan Nair University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Novi Sad, Serbia AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua, Taiwan Vuk Đorđević Ana María Planchuelo-Ravelo Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia National University of Córdoba, CREAN, Córdoba, Argentina Bernadette Julier Diego Rubiales Institut national de la recherche agronomique, Lusignan, France CSIC, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, Córdoba, Spain Kevin McPhee Petr Smýkal North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Fred Muehlbauer Olomouc, Czech Republic USDA, ARS, Washington State University, Pullman, USA Frederick L.
  • Botoșani County)

    Botoșani County)

    Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi http://www.bio.uaic.ro/publicatii/anale_vegetala/anale_veg_index.html s. II a. Biologie vegetală, 2020, 66: 13-29 ISSN: 1223-6578, E-ISSN: 2247-2711 ASPECTS REGARDING FLORA AND THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF SOME PLANT SPECIES FROM THE LOCAL MEADOWS OF BĂICENI (BOTOȘANI COUNTY) Florentina ȘCHIOPU1, Anișoara STRATU2*, Irina IRIMIA2 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to inventory the plant species in the meadows on the territory of Băiceni and highlight their economic importance. The floristic studies were carried out in the vegetation season from 2018 to 2019. Based on the literature, plant species were identified and then processed in terms of bioforms, floristic elements and ecological indices. Also, the economic categories in which the identified species fall were analysed. 66 species belonging to 21 botanical families have been identified. The families Fabaceae, Poaceae and Asteraceae were distinguished by the higher number of species. Most of the species identified in the study area are hemicryptophytes, heliophiles, eurytherms, which grow on dry to moderately moist soils, euritrophs. Over 50% of the identified species belong to several categories of useful plants (fodder, medicinal, melliferous). Keywords: flora, meadows, bioforms, floristic elements, ecological indices, economic categories. Introduction In Romania, in 2014, hayfields and pastures occupied 31.9% of the country's agricultural area (Raport anual privind starea mediului în România, anul 2017). In Botoșani County, at the level of 2019, pastures, hayfields and natural meadows represented 23% of the agricultural area of the county, the pastures having a higher share (19%) (Raport privind starea mediului în județul Botoșani în anul 2019).
  • Ecogeographic, Genetic and Taxonomic Studies of the Genus Lathyrus L

    Ecogeographic, Genetic and Taxonomic Studies of the Genus Lathyrus L

    ECOGEOGRAPHIC, GENETIC AND TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF THE GENUS LATHYRUS L. BY ALI ABDULLAH SHEHADEH A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham March 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Lathyrus species are well placed to meet the increasing global demand for food and animal feed, at the time of climate change. Conservation and sustainable use of the genetic resources of Lathyrus is of significant importance to allow the regain of interest in Lathyrus species in world. A comprehensive global database of Lathyrus species originating from the Mediterranean Basin, Caucasus, Central and West Asia Regions is developed using accessions in major genebanks and information from eight herbaria in Europe. This Global Lathyrus database was used to conduct gap analysis to guide future collecting missions and in situ conservation efforts for 37 priority species. The results showed the highest concentration of Lathyrus priority species in the countries of the Fertile Crescent, France, Italy and Greece.
  • Applied Genetics and Genomics in Alfalfa Breeding

    Applied Genetics and Genomics in Alfalfa Breeding

    Agronomy 2012, 2, 40-61; doi:10.3390/agronomy2010040 OPEN ACCESS agronomy ISSN 2073–4395 www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy Review Applied Genetics and Genomics in Alfalfa Breeding Xuehui Li and E. Charles Brummer * The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-580-224-6804; Fax: +1-580-224-6802. Received: 22 February 2012; in revised form: 2 March 2012 / Accepted: 6 March 2012 / Published: 15 March 2012 Abstract: Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), a perennial and outcrossing species, is a widely planted forage legume for hay, pasture and silage throughout the world. Currently, alfalfa breeding relies on recurrent phenotypic selection, but alternatives incorporating molecular marker assisted breeding could enhance genetic gain per unit time and per unit cost, and accelerate alfalfa improvement. Many major quantitative trait loci (QTL) related to agronomic traits have been identified by family-based QTL mapping, but in relatively large genomic regions. Candidate genes elucidated from model species have helped to identify some potential causal loci in alfalfa mapping and breeding population for specific traits. Recently, high throughput sequencing technologies, coupled with advanced bioinformatics tools, have been used to identify large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in alfalfa, which are being developed into markers. These markers will facilitate fine mapping of quantitative traits and genome wide association mapping of agronomic traits and further advanced breeding strategies for alfalfa, such as marker-assisted selection and genomic selection. Based on ideas from the literature, we suggest several ways to improve selection in alfalfa including (1) diversity selection and paternity testing, (2) introgression of QTL and (3) genomic selection.
  • Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford

    Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford

    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 6-1911 Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons Recommended Citation Bradford, Frederick Charles, "Apple Varieties in Maine" (1911). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2384. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2384 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Maine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE by FREDERICK CHARLES BRADFORD, B. S . Orono, Maine. June, 1911. 8 2 8 5 INTRODUCTION The following pages represent an effort to trace the causes of the changing procession of varieties of apples grown in Maine. To this end the history of fruit growing in Maine has been carefully studied, largely through the Agricultural Reports from 1850 to 1909 and the columns of the Maine Farmer fran 1838 to 1875. The inquiry has been confined as rigidly as possible to this state, out­ side sources being referred to only for sake of compari­ son. Rather incidentally, soil influences, modifications due to climate, etc., have been considered. Naturally* since the inquiry was limited to printed record, nothing new has been discovered in this study. Perhaps a somewhat new point of view has been achieved. And, since early Maine pomological literature has been rather neglected by our leading writers, some few forgot­ ten facts have been exhumed.
  • Variety Description Origin Approximate Ripening Uses

    Variety Description Origin Approximate Ripening Uses

    Approximate Variety Description Origin Ripening Uses Yellow Transparent Tart, crisp Imported from Russia by USDA in 1870s Early July All-purpose Lodi Tart, somewhat firm New York, Early 1900s. Montgomery x Transparent. Early July Baking, sauce Pristine Sweet-tart PRI (Purdue Rutgers Illinois) release, 1994. Mid-late July All-purpose Dandee Red Sweet-tart, semi-tender New Ohio variety. An improved PaulaRed type. Early August Eating, cooking Redfree Mildly tart and crunchy PRI release, 1981. Early-mid August Eating Sansa Sweet, crunchy, juicy Japan, 1988. Akane x Gala. Mid August Eating Ginger Gold G. Delicious type, tangier G Delicious seedling found in Virginia, late 1960s. Mid August All-purpose Zestar! Sweet-tart, crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1999. State Fair x MN 1691. Mid August Eating, cooking St Edmund's Pippin Juicy, crisp, rich flavor From Bury St Edmunds, 1870. Mid August Eating, cider Chenango Strawberry Mildly tart, berry flavors 1850s, Chenango County, NY Mid August Eating, cooking Summer Rambo Juicy, tart, aromatic 16th century, Rambure, France. Mid-late August Eating, sauce Honeycrisp Sweet, very crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1991. Unknown parentage. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Burgundy Tart, crisp 1974, from NY state Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Blondee Sweet, crunchy, juicy New Ohio apple. Related to Gala. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Gala Sweet, crisp New Zealand, 1934. Golden Delicious x Cox Orange. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Swiss Gourmet Sweet-tart, juicy Switzerland. Golden x Idared. Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Golden Supreme Sweet, Golden Delcious type Idaho, 1960. Golden Delicious seedling Early September Eating, cooking Pink Pearl Sweet-tart, bright pink flesh California, 1944, developed from Surprise Early September All-purpose Autumn Crisp Juicy, slow to brown Golden Delicious x Monroe.
  • Apples: Organic Production Guide

    Apples: Organic Production Guide

    A project of the National Center for Appropriate Technology 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org Apples: Organic Production Guide By Tammy Hinman This publication provides information on organic apple production from recent research and producer and Guy Ames, NCAT experience. Many aspects of apple production are the same whether the grower uses low-spray, organic, Agriculture Specialists or conventional management. Accordingly, this publication focuses on the aspects that differ from Published nonorganic practices—primarily pest and disease control, marketing, and economics. (Information on March 2011 organic weed control and fertility management in orchards is presented in a separate ATTRA publica- © NCAT tion, Tree Fruits: Organic Production Overview.) This publication introduces the major apple insect pests IP020 and diseases and the most effective organic management methods. It also includes farmer profiles of working orchards and a section dealing with economic and marketing considerations. There is an exten- sive list of resources for information and supplies and an appendix on disease-resistant apple varieties. Contents Introduction ......................1 Geographical Factors Affecting Disease and Pest Management ...........3 Insect and Mite Pests .....3 Insect IPM in Apples - Kaolin Clay ........6 Diseases ........................... 14 Mammal and Bird Pests .........................20 Thinning ..........................20 Weed and Orchard Floor Management ......20 Economics and Marketing ........................22 Conclusion
  • BIOLOGICAL and NUTRITIONAL VALUE of the GENUS Medicago L

    BIOLOGICAL and NUTRITIONAL VALUE of the GENUS Medicago L

    Lucrări Ştiinţifice – vol. 57 (1) 2014, seria Agronomie BIOLOGICAL AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF THE GENUS Medicago L. IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Alexandru TELEUŢĂ1, Victor ŢÎŢEI1 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract We investigated the biological peculiarities, productivity, biochemical composition and nutritional value of the natural fodder of species of the genus Medicago L., M. falcata L., M. varia Mart., M. tianschanica Vass., M. agropyretorum Vass., M. cancellata M.B. and M. glutinosa M.B., Medicago sativa L. was used as control. It was found out that, at the first mowing, the species Medicago tianschanica, Medicago varia and Medicago agropyretorum have a productivity of 2.00-2.14 kg/m2 exceeding by 22-27% the control, with a nutritional value of the natural fodder - 0.20-0.23 nutritive unit/kg and a content of digestible protein – 175.6- 211.6 g/ nutritive unit. Key words: biological peculiarities, fodder leguminous plants, nutritional value, productivity, species of genus Medicago L. It is well known that, in the modern Trifolieae (Bronn) Endl., comprises three agriculture, the sustainable farming is important subgenera and 87 species (Small E., 2011). In our because it ensures a balance between plant growing country, six species are known (Negru A., 2007), of and animal husbandry. The development of the wich alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. is often grown as zootechnical sector requires provision and fodder crop (Lupasco M., 2004). Alfalfa species diversification of fodder production so that it will be show a high ecological plasticity through their balanced in terms of quantity and quality throughout resistance to heat, drought, salts and low the year, according to the physiological temperatures, efficient use of water resources, their requirements of animals and the stability of animal capacity to regenerate quickly after mowing and the production that will meet the market requirements.
  • T.C Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Çorum Ili

    T.C Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Çorum Ili

    T.C ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ÇORUM İLİ İSKİLİP İLÇESİNDE YETİŞTİRİLEN MAHALLİ MİSKET ELMALARININ FENOLOJİK, MORFOLOJİK, POMOLOJİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ VE MOLEKÜLER OLARAK TANIMLANMASI BERNA DOĞRU YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ BAHÇE BİTKİLERİ ANABİLİM DALI AKADEMİK DANIŞMAN Prof. Dr. Turan KARADENİZ İKİNCİ DANIŞMAN Yrd. Doç. Dr. Hatice İKTEN ORDU-2012 i ÇORUM İLİ İSKİLİP İLÇESİNDE YETİŞTİRİLEN MAHALLİ MİSKET ELMALARININ FENOLOJİK, MORFOLOJİK, POMOLOJİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ VE MOLEKÜLER OLARAK TANIMLANMASI ÖZET Bu araĢtırma, Çorum ili Ġskilip ilçesinin mahalli Misket elmalarının fenolojik, morfolojik, pomolojik ve moleküler özelliklerinin tanımlanması amacıyla 2010-2011 yılları arasında yürütülmüĢtür. Seçilen genotiplerde ortalama meyve ağırlığı 102.94-175.74 g arasında, meyve çapı 58.96-73.92 mm arasında, meyve boyu 57.88-72.36 mm arasında, meyve eti sertliği 8.40-11.66 lb, meyve hacmi 120-232 ml arasında, SÇKM % 10.65-% 15.00 arasında; pH 4.26-5.80 arasında; TEAM (titre edilebilir asit miktarı) ise % 0.13-% 0.35 arasında tespit edilmiĢtir. Seçilen elma genotipleri arasındaki genetik çeĢitliliği DNA seviyesinde saptamak için 30 RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA ) primeri kullanılmıĢtır. Amplifikasyonlar sonucu toplam 217 adet bant elde edilmiĢ ve bu bantlardan 102 adeti (% 45)’i polimorfik özellik göstermiĢtir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ġskilip, Misket Elması, Genetik Kaynaklar, Seleksiyon, RAPD ii DETERMINATION OF PHENOLOGICAL, MORPHOLOGICAL, POMOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF LOCAL MISKET APPLE
  • Waldo County Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Fruit Tree and Shrub Sale

    Waldo County Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Fruit Tree and Shrub Sale

    Waldo County Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Fruit Tree and Shrub Sale 2018 Offerings We are returning this year with many carefully selected fruit trees, berry plants and landscape shrubs and perennials that will enhance your property’s health, natural balance, beauty and productivity. Our Landscape Plants theme this year is Wet and Dry: Beautiful Natives for Rain Gardens, Wet Areas and Shorelines. The plants offered will also tolerate drier conditions. We are also returning with popular Inside this issue plants that offer year-round color and interest, and that are good substitutes for invasive plants now Inside Story Inside Story banned. Buttonbush, at right, is a lovely shoreline Inside Story bush that can stand inundation...and also has Inside Story beautiful flowers that feed butterflies and retain their form into the winter. Important Dates 05/31 06/26 Native shrubs such as the highbush or American cranberry (at left) offer flowers, fruits and fall color that is as 07/29 attractive as invasive shrubs like burning bush or Japanese barberry. Each landscape plant we offer has been selected for multi-season interest and color as well as wildlife value. Fruit Trees and Shrubs SEMI-DWARF APPLE On MM111 rootstock – semi dwarf trees – grow 15-20’ but can be pruned to a shorter height. Hardy and quicker to bear fruit than standard trees. 1. Wolf River Apple – (Left) Huge heirloom, great for pies, making a big comeback in Maine. Disease resistant and extremely hardy. 2. Holstein Apple – Seedling of Cox Orange Pippin, but larger. Creamy, yellowish, juicy flesh is aromatic and very flavorful.
  • An Old Rose: the Apple

    An Old Rose: the Apple

    This is a republication of an article which first appeared in the March/April 2002 issue of Garden Compass Magazine New apple varieties never quite Rosaceae, the rose family, is vast, complex and downright confusing at times. completely overshadow the old ones because, as with roses, a variety is new only until the next This complexity has no better exemplar than the prince of the rose family, Malus, better known as the variety comes along and takes its apple. The apple is older in cultivation than the rose. It presents all the extremes in color, size, fragrance place. and plant character of its rose cousin plus an important added benefit—flavor! One can find apples to suit nearly every taste and cultural demand. Without any special care, apples grow where no roses dare. Hardy varieties like the Pippins, Pearmains, Snow, Lady and Northern Spy have been grown successfully in many different climates across the U.S. With 8,000-plus varieties worldwide and with new ones introduced annually, apple collectors in most climates are like kids in a candy store. New, Favorite and Powerhouse Apples New introductions such as Honeycrisp, Cameo and Pink Lady are adapted to a wide range of climates and are beginning to be planted in large quantities. The rich flavors of old favorites like Spitzenburg and Golden Russet Each one is a unique eating experience that are always a pleasant surprise for satisfies a modern taste—crunchy firmness, plenty inexperienced tasters. of sweetness and tantalizing flavor. Old and antique apples distinguish These new varieties show promise in the themselves with unusual skin competition for the #1 spot in the world’s colors and lingering aftertastes produce sections and farmers’ markets.