Anselm of Canterbury and the Development of Theological Thought, C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anselm of Canterbury and the Development of Theological Thought, C Durham E-Theses Anselm of Canterbury and the Development of Theological Thought, c. 1070-1141 DUNTHORNE, JUDITH,RACHEL How to cite: DUNTHORNE, JUDITH,RACHEL (2012) Anselm of Canterbury and the Development of Theological Thought, c. 1070-1141, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6360/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Anselm of Canterbury and the Development of Theological Thought, c. 1070-1141 Judith R. Dunthorne Abstract This thesis explores the role of Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109) in the development of theological thought in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries. It aims to demonstrate that Anselm’s thought had a greater impact on the early development of scholastic theology than is often recognized, particularly in the areas of the doctrine of the incarnation and redemption, but also in his discussion of freedom and sin. Through his explanation of the economy of salvation in terms of making satisfaction for sin, and his rejection of modes of discussion that focussed on the rights and role of the devil, Anselm’s writing on the theology of the redemption provided a framework for the discussion of later authors such as Hugh of St Victor, Peter Abelard, Bernard of Clairvaux and authors associated with the School of Laon, among others. Such discussion often utilized Anselm as an explicator of difficult passages in patristic theology, notably Augustine, and his work was most controversial when he was thought to have contradicted earlier authority. Anselm was involved in contemporary polemics with both Jews and Christian theologians, as well as producing works that explored profound theological and metaphysical ideas. In his emphasis on the place and role of reason in divine questions, he crossed the boundaries between ‘monastic’ and ‘scholastic’ thought. Through an exploration of Anselmian elements in the thought of a variety of authors from the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries, this thesis aims to contribute to a broadening understanding of the legacy of this great thinker. 1 Anselm of Canterbury and the Development of Theological Thought, c. 1070-1141. Judith R. Dunthorne Submitted for examination for PhD, Durham University 2012 2 Table of Contents Abbreviations 4 Acknowledgements 7 Preface 9 Chapter 1 – Cur Deus homo - The Necessity of Satisfaction 18 Chapter 2 – Cur Deus homo – The Rights of the Devil 57 Chapter 3 – Cur Deus homo – Jewish-Christian Disputation 82 Chapter 4 – Freedom and the Will 108 Chapter 5 – Original Sin and the Sinless Christ 144 Chapter 6 – God and the Trinity 181 Conclusions 201 Appendix – Manuscript Distribution Tables 203 Bibliography 211 3 Abbreviations AHDLMA - Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen age. CCCM – Corpus christianorum continuatio mediaevalis. CCSL - Corpus christianorum series latina. CDH - Anselm, Cur Deus homo, ed. Schmitt, S.F., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 2, pp. 37-133. CR - Abelard, Commentaria in epistolam Pauli ad Romanos, ed. Buytaert, E.M., Petri Abaelardi Opera Theologica, Corpus christianorum continuatio mediaevalis, 11 (Turnhout, 1969). CSEL – Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum latinorum. DA – Gilbert Crispin, De anima, ed. Abulafia, A.S. and Evans, G.R., The Works of Gilbert Crispin (London, 1986), pp. 157-164. DC – Anselm, De concordia, ed. Schmitt, F.S., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 2, pp. 221-78. DCD - Anselm, De casu diaboli, ed. Schmitt, S.F., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 1, pp. 227-76. DCG – Gilbert Crispin, Disputatio christiani cum gentili, eds. Abulafia, A.S., and Evans, G.R., The Works of Gilbert Crispin (London, 1986), pp. 61-87. DCV - Anselm, De conceptu uirginalis, ed. Schmitt, F.S., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 2, pp. 134-173. DGLA – Bernard of Clairvaux, De gratia et libero arbitrio, ed. Leclercq, J. et al., Sancti Bernardi Opera (Paris, 1957-77), vol. 3, pp. 157-203. DIC - Gilbert Crispin, Disputatio iudei et christiani, eds. Abulafia, A.S. and Evans, G.R., The Works of Gilbert Crispin (London, 1986), pp. 1-53. DIV - Anselm, De incarnatione uerbi, ed. Schmitt, F.S., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 2, pp. 1-35. DLA - Anselm, De libertate arbitrii, ed. Schmitt F.S., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 1, pp. 191-226. DLA - Augustine, De libero arbitrio, ed. Green, W.M., Corpus christianorum series latina, 19 (Turnhout, 1970). 4 DLA – Honorius Augustodunensis, De libero arbitrio, ed. Migne, Patrologia latina, 172, 1223-1230. DPO - Odo of Tournai, De peccato originali libri tres, ed. Migne, Patrologia latina, 160, 1071-1102. DS - Hugh of St Victor, De sacramentis christianae fidei , ed. Berndt, R., Corpus Victorinum, Textus Historici, 1 (Munster, 2008). DT - Augustine, De trinitate, ed. Mountain, W.J., Corpus christianorum series latina, 50 (Turnhout, 1968). DV - Anselm, De ueritate, ed. Schmitt, F.S., Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia (Edinburgh, 1946), vol. 1, pp. 169-89. PL – Patrologia latina. RB – Revue bénédictine. RTAM - Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale. SBO – Bernard of Clairvaux, Sancti Bernardi Opera, eds. Leclercq, J. et al., 8 vols. (Paris, 1957-77). SDP - Sententie diuine pagine, ed. Bliemetzrieder, F., ‘Anselms von Laon systematische Sentenzen’, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalter, 18.2-3 (1919), pp. 1-46. TC - Abelard, Theologia christiana, ed. Buytaert, E.M., Petri Abaelardi Opera Theologica, Corpus christianorum continuatio mediaevalis, 12 (Turnhout, 1969). VA - Eadmer, Vita Anselmi, ed. Southern, R.W., The Life of St Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, by Eadmer (Oxford, 1962). 5 Copyright Notice The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author's prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 6 Acknowledgements My first thanks are to my supervisor, Giles Gasper. He it was who first introduced me to the joys of intellectual history as an eager young undergraduate in 2004, and encouraged me to pursue it through the various stages of BA, MA and PhD. For all the trouble he has suffered since then, he has only himself to blame. Supervisions with Giles are always challenging, often highly entertaining, and cover a wider range of subjects than one would have thought possible. For providing me with such comprehensive training as a historian, theologian and linguist, I thank him. Perhaps more important than this have been his constant friendship and support through a succession of catastrophes over the last five years. His unfailing confidence that I would complete my thesis, at times when the obstacles must have seemed almost insuperable, and the time and ingenuity he has devoted to ensuring that illness and disability would not prevent me from attending conferences and playing a full role in the life of the university, have enabled me to succeed in spite of everything. For all this I am profoundly grateful. Thanks also go to my second supervisor, Richard Gameson, for help with manuscripts; Ingo Gildenhard and Justine Wolfenden for improving my Latin; Greti Dinkova-Bruun for a thorough grounding in Palaeography; the academic and administrative staff of the Department of History and Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies in Durham, for stimulating conversations and practical help in researching and writing my thesis; the Arts and Humanities Research Council, who funded my research; the Institute of Advanced Studies in Durham, who supplied additional funding for conferences; the Document Delivery Service at the University Library for managing to track down the majority of my more obscure bibliographic requests; and St John’s College for providing me with a home, social centre and source of advice and assistance in so many areas of my life and work. Thanks to all my friends in the postgraduate medievalist community in Durham: my housemate Kathryn Bedford for her great friendship and generosity, which enabled me to stay in Durham far longer than would otherwise have been possible; Gemma Wain, Nick Smith, Charlie Rozier, Tom Ball, Rachael Matthews, Mark Clavier and everyone with whom I have shared tea, cake and twelfth-century-centred discussions over the last few years. Non- medievalist friends whose support and practical assistance have been of tremendous value include Amanda Taylor Aiken, Jon Monk, Erica Storey, Michael Elston, Sarah Arnett, Lizzie 7 Hartley, Daisy Thurkettle and my cousins, Ruth and Nic Carlyle, whose warm hospitality whenever I needed to be in London was as welcome as their wise and loving advice at every stage of the process. Thanks also to my family at St Martin’s Church, Walsall; and to the neurosurgeons, neurologists and rehabilitation teams that have played such a vital role in my progress to date, in particular Steve Sturman, Richard Walsh and Spyros Sgouros, without whom I would never have made it to university in the first place. Finally, to my family. Words cannot express what I owe to my Mum, Liz Dunthorne, for her constant love and support through everything that has happened. I can only say, I love you. My Dad, Chris Dunthorne, did not live to see the completion of this thesis, but I hope he would have been proud of this latest stage in the historical adventure that we started together many years ago, on childhood trips to castles, abbeys and museums.
Recommended publications
  • Notes Du Mont Royal ←
    Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres l BHAR-TRIHABIS SENTENTIAÈ I. CARMEN (mon 01mm NOMINE CIBCUMFERTUB i EROTICUM. AD conrcum MSTT. FIDEM «EDIDIT LATINE VERTU ET communs ’ A I ’ msmuxrr PETRUS A BQHDLEN. fi BEROLINI IMPBNSIS PERDINANDI DUEMMIÆRI MDCCCXXXIII. nus AQADEIIÇIS. BHARTPJHABJS SENTENTIAÈ CARMEN QUOD 0mm, NOMINE CIRCUMFERTUB I EBOTICUM. AD CODICUM MSTT. FIDEM .EDIDIT LATINE VERTIT ET COMMENTARIIS i INSTRUXIT t PETRUS A BQHULEN. «me» I BEROLINI musas rnnnmmm nusmmam MDCCCXXXIII. TYPIS AQADEHICIS. VIRO SUMME REVERENDO IOANNI SCHULZIO THEOL. DO’CTORI BORUSSORUM REG! POTENTISSIMO A CONSILHS INTIME EQUITI ILLUSTBI CET. HUMANITATIS ET INGENUAE DOCTRINAE FAUTOPJ INSIGNI HASCE BHARTRIHARIS SENTENTIAS . FRUCTUUM EX ITINEBE LITTERARIO NUÎ’ER PERCEPTORUM PRIMITIAS ANIM! BENEFICIORUM IN SE COLLATORUM MEMORIS TESTES ESSE VOLUIT EDITOR. PRAEFATIO. 1 LOndini quum ante biennium, summi Borussiae Ministerü munificentia commorari mihivliceret, ut, quad diuverat in vous, litteris Indicis pro viribus meîs consulerem, nihil prîus equidem et antiquius habui, quam ut sifim meam in Antiquitates Indicae gentis ardentîssimam quocunque modo explerem: nOn solum libris rarioribus legendis excerpendîsve et editionibus textuum Sanscritorum comparandis atque emendis, sed scul- pturis quoque et Picturis, quee in Museis anservantur, inspiciendis et virorum doctorum colloquio, ubi dubii aliquid atque obscuritatis chori- retur, illustrandis, inprimis vero codicibus manuscriptis avulvendis de? scribendisque, donec pestis,’ pro dolor! Gangetica in patria urbe exona et iamiam saeviens post» exiguum temporis spatium studia interrupit dile- ctissima et patremfamilias idomum revocavit. Inter ca quae raptim ipse collegi, de iis enim’quae Roçenio meo et Stenzlero, intima mihi ami- citia coniunctis debeo: Chhandogyae codîcem, apographa Ritœanhari, Gimgovindi, Brahmavaivartapurani rell.
    [Show full text]
  • Anselm's Cur Deus Homo
    Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo: A Meditation from the Point of View of the Sinner Gene Fendt Elements in Anselm's Cur Deus Homo point quite differently from the usual view of it as the locus classicus for a theory of Incarnation and Atonement which exhibits Christ as providing the substitutive revenging satisfaction for the infinite dishonor God suffers at the sin of Adam. This meditation will attempt to bring out how the rhetorical ergon of the work upon faith and conscience drives the sinner to see the necessity of the marriage of human with divine natures offered in Christ and how that marriage raises both man and creation out of sin and its defects. This explanation should exhibit both to believers, who seek to understand, and to unbelievers (primarily Jews and Muslims), from a common root, a solution "intelligible to all, and appealing because of its utility and the beauty of its reasoning" (1.1). Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo is the locus classicus for a theory of Incarnation and Atonement which exhibits Christ as providing the substitutive revenging satisfaction for the infinite dishonor God suffers at the sin of Adam (and company).1 There are elements in it, however, which seem to point quite differently from such a view. This meditation will attempt to bring further into the open how the rhetorical ergon of the work upon “faith and conscience”2 shows something new in this Paschal event, which cannot be well accommodated to the view which makes Christ a scapegoat killed for our sin.3 This ergon upon the conscience I take—in what I trust is a most suitably monastic fashion—to be more important than the theoretical theological shell which Anselm’s discussion with Boso more famously leaves behind.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutio 'Universi Dominici Gregis'
    1996-02-26- SS Ioannes Paulus II - Constitutio ‘Universi Dominici Gregis’ IOANNIS PAULI PP. II SUMMI PONTIFICIS CONSTITUTIO APOSTOLICA «UNIVERSI DOMINICI GREGIS» DE SEDE APOSTOLICA VACANTE DEQUE ROMANI PONTIFICIS ELECTIONE Ioannes Paulus PP. II Servus Servorum Dei ad perpetuam rei memoriam UNIVERSI DOMINICI GREGIS Pastor est Romanae Ecclesiae Episcopus, in qua Beatus Petrus Apostolus, divina disponente Providentia, Christo per martyrium extremum sanguinis testimonium reddidit. Plane igitur intellegitur legitimam apostolicam in hac Sede successionem, quacum « propter potentiorem principalitatem, necesse est omnem convenire Ecclesiam »,(1) usque peculiari diligentia esse observatam. Hanc propter causam Summi Pontifices, saeculorum decursu, suum ipsorum esse officium aeque ac praecipuum ius existimaverunt opportunis normis Successoris electionem moderari. Sic, proximis superioribus temporibus, Decessores Nostri Sanctus Pius X (2), Pius XI (3), Pius XII (4), Ioannes XXIII (5) et novissime Paulus VI (6), pro peculiaribus temporum necessitatibus, providas congruentesque curaverunt regulas de hac quaestione ferendas, ut convenienter procederent apta praeparatio atque accurata evolutio consessus electorum cui, vacante Apostolica Sede, grave omninoque difficile demandatur officium Romani Pontificis eligendi. Si quidem nunc et Ipsi hoc aggredimur negotium, id certe facimus haud parvi aestimantes normas illas quas e contrario penitus colimus quasque magna ex parte confirmandas censemus, saltem quod ad praecipua elementa et principia primaria attinet
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)
    Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89754-9 - An Introduction to Medieval Theology Rik Van Nieuwenhove Index More information Index Abelard, Peter, 82, 84, 99–111, 116, 120 beatific vision, 41, 62, 191 Alain of Lille, 71 beatitude, 172, 195–96 Albert the Great, 171, 264 Beatrijs van Nazareth, 170 Alexander of Hales, 147, 211, 227 beguine movement, 170 allegory, 15, 43, 45, 47, 177 Benedict XII, Pope, 265 Amaury of Bène, 71 Benedict, St., 28–29, 42 Ambrose, 7, 10, 149 Berengar of Tours, 60, 83, 129, 160, see also amor ipse notitia est 51, 117, see love and knowledge Eucharist anagogy, 47 Bernard of Clairvaux, 79, 82, 100, 104, 110, 112–15, analogy, see univocity 147, 251 analogy in Aquinas, 182–85, 234, 235 critique of Abelard, 110–11 Anselm of Canterbury, 16, 30, 71, 78, 81, 83–98, on loving God, 112–14 204, 236 Boccaccio, Giovanni, 251 Anselm of Laon, 72, 99 Boethius, 29–33, 125, 137 Anthony, St., 27 Bonaventure, 34, 47, 123, 141, 146, 148, 170, 173, apophaticism, 8, 34, 271 176, 179, 211–24, 227, 228, 230, 232, 242, 243, Aquinas, 182–83 245, 254 Aquinas, 22, 24, 34, 47, 51, 72, 87, 89, 90, 133, 146, Boniface, Pope, 249 148, 151, 154, 164, 169, 171–210, 214, 225, 227, 230, 235, 236, 237, 238, 240, 241, 244, 246, Calvin, 14 254, 255, 257, 266 Carabine, Deirdre, 65 Arianism, 20, 21 Carthusians, 79 Aristotle, 9, 20, 29, 78, 84, 179, 181, 192, 195, 212, Cassian, John, 27–29, 47 213, 216, 223, 225, 226, 227, 229, 237, 254, Cassidorius, 124 267, 268 cathedral schools, 82, 169 Arts, 124, 222 Catherine of Siena, 251 and pedagogy (Hugh), 124–28
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and God As One, Creator, and Trinity in Early Theology Through Augustine and Its Theological Fruitfulness in the 21St Century
    Creation and God as One, Creator, and Trinity in Early Theology through Augustine and Its Theological Fruitfulness in the 21st Century Submitted by Jane Ellingwood to the University of Exeter as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology in September 2015 This dissertation is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the dissertation may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this dissertation which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: _________Jane Ellingwood _________________________ 2 Abstract My primary argument in this thesis is that creation theologies significantly influenced early developments in the doctrine of the Trinity, especially in Augustine of Hippo’s theology. Thus this is a work of historical theology, but I conclude with proposals for how Augustine’s theologies of creation and the Trinity can be read fruitfully with modern theology. I critically analyse developments in trinitarian theologies in light of ideas that were held about creation. These include the doctrine of creation ‘out of nothing’ and ideas about other creative acts (e.g., forming or fashioning things). Irenaeus and other early theologians posited roles for God (the Father), the Word / Son, the Spirit, or Wisdom in creative acts without working out formal views on economic trinitarian acts. During the fourth century trinitarian controversies, creation ‘out of nothing’ and ideas about ‘modes of origin’ influenced thinking on consubstantiality and relations within the Trinity.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Christian Church*
    a Grace Notes course History of the Christian Church VOLUME 5. The Middle Ages, the Papal Theocracy in Conflict with the Secular Power from Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, AD 1049 to 1294 By Philip Schaff CH512 Chapter 12: Scholastic and Mystic Theology History of the Christian Church Volume 5 The Middle Ages, the Papal Theocracy in Conflict with the Secular Power from Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, AD 1049 to 1294 CH512 Table of Contents Chapter 12. Scholastic and Mystic Theology .................................................................................2 5.95. Literature and General Introduction ......................................................................................... 2 5.96. Sources and Development of Scholasticism .............................................................................. 4 5.97. Realism and Nominalism ........................................................................................................... 6 5.98. Anselm of Canterbury ................................................................................................................ 7 5.99. Peter Abelard ........................................................................................................................... 12 5.100. Abelard’s Teachings and Theology ........................................................................................ 18 5.101. Younger Contemporaries of Abelard ..................................................................................... 21 5.102. Peter the Lombard and the Summists
    [Show full text]
  • Jones, David Albert, the Soul of the Embryo
    J The Soul of the Embryo: An enquiry into the status of the human embryo in the Christian tradition DAVID ALBERT JONES • , continuum A LONDON • NEW YORK Continuum The Tower Building 15 East 26th Street 11 York Road New York London, SE1 7NX NY 10010 www.continuumbooks.com C) David Jones 2004 Contents All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Abbreviations A catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. Foreword ISBN 0 8264 6296 0 Introduction 1 Moulded in the Earth The embryo in the Hebrew Scriptures: creation, Typeset by BookEns Ltd, Royston, Herts. providence, calling Printed and hound in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wilts. 2 Curdled Like Cheese Ancient embryology: Hippocrates and Aristotle 3 Discarded Children • Exposure, infanticide and abortion in ancient Greece and Rome 4 Grieving in Ramah Jewish attitudes to infanticide and abortion 5 Medicinal Penalties Early Christianity and abortion: Celtic/Anglo-Saxon penances, Greek/Latin canons 6 Soul Talk Soul as the principle of life, body and soul, the I would like to thank Fr Michael Hayes, Head of the School of Theology, spiritual soul Philosophy and History at St Mary's College for supporting an ethos of research 7 Whence the Soul? and scholarship within the School; Robin Baird-Smith of Continuum books for The Church Fathers on the origin of the soul: his great patience; and the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics for the use of pre-existence, traducianism, creationism their excellent library.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theological Assessment of Anselm's Cur Deus Homo
    123/2 master:119/3 19/5/09 12:40 Page 121 121 A Theological Assessment of Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo Dan Saunders The hypothesis of this article is that Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo shoUld not be regarded as a serioUs or complete theory of the atonement. This is dUe to its thoroUgh disregard of and incompatibility with ScriptUre, internal inconsistencies, errors and general theological inaccUracies. To prove this hypothesis we provide a biblical sUrvey of atonement themes and meaning. We examine the Mosaic sin-offering and atonement sacrifices of LeviticUs 4 and 16 and the Servant Song of Isaiah 53. We show that JesUs’ Understanding was that he was the Servant, as indicated by lingUistic and conceptUal connections in Mark 10:45b, LUke 22:37 and Acts 8. We conclUde that atonement mUst be viewed in relation to the salvific death of JesUs and explained with reference to the terms, metaphors and ideas Used in ScriptUre. We then sUrvey historical theology in order to place Cur Deus Homo in its appropriate historical context. OUr theological assessment then proceeds from both a scriptUral and historical perspective, while also noting the systematic and practical advances, implications and conseqUences of Cur Deus Homo . We conclUde that althoUgh a solid apologetic for the incarnation and a lasting repUdiation of the devil- ransom theory, Cur Deus Homo is deficient as a theory of the atonement. The satisfaction theory becomes little more than a moral theory and leads to other errors. The theory of penal sUbstitUtion by way of sacrificial ransom, best articUlated by the Reformers, is to be preferred as the view that most accords with ScriptUre.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Medieval G
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Religious Studies Faculty Publications Religious Studies 2001 History of Western Ethics: Early Medieval G. Scott aD vis University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/religiousstudies-faculty- publications Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Davis, G. Scott. "History of Western Ethics: Early Medieval." In Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Lawrence Becker and Charlotte Becker, 709-15. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 2001. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Religious Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. history of Western ethics: 5. Early Medieval Copyright 2001 from Encyclopedia of Ethics by Lawrence Becker and Charlotte Becker. Reproduced by permission of Taylor and Francis, LLC, a division of Informa plc. history of Western ethics: 5. Early Medieval ''Medieval" and its cognates arose as terms of op­ probrium, used by the Italian humanists to charac­ terize more a style than an age. Hence it is difficult at best to distinguish late antiquity from the early middle ages. It is equally difficult to determine the proper scope of "ethics," the philosophical schools of late antiquity having become purveyors of ways of life in the broadest sense, not clearly to be distin­ guished from the more intellectually oriented ver­ sions of their religious rivals. This article will begin with the emergence of philosophically informed re­ flection on the nature of life, its ends, and respon­ sibilities in the writings of the Latin Fathers and close with the twelfth century, prior to the systematic reintroduction and study of the Aristotelian corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St
    NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St. Jerome About NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St. Jerome Title: NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.html Author(s): Jerome, St. Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Freemantle, M.A., The Hon. W.H. (Translator) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Public Domain Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome St. Jerome Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 Title Page.. p. 2 Translator©s Preface.. p. 3 Prolegomena to Jerome.. p. 4 Introductory.. p. 4 Contemporary History.. p. 4 Life of Jerome.. p. 10 The Writings of Jerome.. p. 22 Estimate of the Scope and Value of Jerome©s Writings.. p. 26 Character and Influence of Jerome.. p. 32 Chronological Tables of the Life and Times of St. Jerome A.D. 345-420.. p. 33 The Letters of St. Jerome.. p. 40 To Innocent.. p. 40 To Theodosius and the Rest of the Anchorites.. p. 44 To Rufinus the Monk.. p. 44 To Florentius.. p. 48 To Florentius.. p. 49 To Julian, a Deacon of Antioch.. p. 50 To Chromatius, Jovinus, and Eusebius.. p. 51 To Niceas, Sub-Deacon of Aquileia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cross of Wisdom Anthony Feneuil
    The Cross of Wisdom Anthony Feneuil To cite this version: Anthony Feneuil. The Cross of Wisdom: Ambiguities in Turning Down Apologetics (Paul, Anselm, Barth). Hans-Christoph Askani; Christophe Chalamet. The Wisdom and Foolishness of God: First Corinthians 1-2 in Theological Exploration, Fortress Press, 2015, 9781451490206. halshs-01257482 HAL Id: halshs-01257482 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01257482 Submitted on 17 Jan 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 8 The Cross of Wisdom: Ambiguities in Turning Down Apologetics (Paul, Anselm, Barth) Anthony Feneuil There is more than one fool in the Bible, and I would like to start with another fool than Paul’s, but whose legacy in the history of theology (and philosophy) has been equally signi«cant. I want to talk about the fool from Psalms 14 and 53, who dares to say in his heart: “There is no God.” How is the foolishness of this fool ( ), called nabal in Latin , and in Greek ἄφρων, related to the foolishness of insipiens God (μωρία, in Latin ) in Paul’s epistle? It would certainly stultitia be interesting to compare philologically μωρία and ἄφρων, and to determine what version of the psalm Paul could have been reading, 167 This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:07:09 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE WISDOM AND FOOLISHNESS OF GOD in order to guess whether he intended to distinguish the two kinds of foolishness.
    [Show full text]