DOCSLIB.ORG

FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery Public Comment Draft Report March 2018 Certificate Code: TBC Client: Finland Fishermen’s Association / Suomen Ammattikalastajaliitto R.Y. Assessment Conducted by: Acoura Marine Ltd On behalf of Acoura Jim Andrews and Giuseppe Scarcella Acoura Version V2.1 04/01/17 Acoura Marine Peer Review Draft Report FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery Assessment Data Sheet FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery Public Comment Draft Report March 2018 CAB details Acoura Marine Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ Phone/Fax 0131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Fisheries Department Client details Finland Fishermen’s Association / Suomen Ammattikalastajaliitto R.Y. Address Jordaksentie 124, FIN-07840, Lindkoski, Finland Phone/Fax +358 400720690 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Kim Jordas Assessment Team Team Leader Jim Andrews P1 Assessor Giuseppe Scarcella P2 Assessor Jim Andrews P3 Assessor Jim Andrews Copyright © 2017 by Acoura Marine All rights reserved. No portion of this report may be reproduced in any manner for use by any other MSC Conformity Assessment Body without the express written permission of Acoura Marine, and subject to such conditions specified by Acoura Marine in any such permission. Page 1 of 380 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine Peer Review Draft Report FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery Contents 1 Glossary ...................................................................................................................... 12 2 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 14 3 Authorship and Peer Reviewers ................................................................................... 16 Assessment Team ................................................................................................ 16 Peer Reviewers ............................................................................................. 17 RBF Training ......................................................................................................... 17 4 Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................ 18 Units of Assessment (UoA) ................................................................................... 18 Units of Assessment ...................................................................................... 18 Other eligible fishers ...................................................................................... 19 Overlapping fisheries ..................................................................................... 20 Overlapping fisheries ..................................................................................... 20 Final UoC(s) .......................................................................................................... 20 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ....................................................... 21 Scope of fishery .................................................................................................... 23 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................... 24 Overview ........................................................................................................ 24 Trawl fishery .................................................................................................. 25 Herring Trap fishery ....................................................................................... 28 Principle One: Target Species Background ........................................................... 35 Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in the Baltic Sea (Subdivisions 22-32) .................... 35 Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 25–29 and 32 (Central Baltic Sea, excluding Gulf of Riga) ................................................................................................. 40 Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivision 30 (Bothnian Sea) ........................ 44 Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivision 31 (Bothnian Bay) ......................... 48 Fishery management in the Baltic Sea ........................................................... 52 Multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2187/2005 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 ................................................. 54 Multispecies considerations for the central Baltic stocks: cod in Subdivisions 25– 32, herring in Subdivisions 25–29 and 32, and sprat in Subdivisions 22–32 ................. 56 Target Species as “Key Low Trophic Level (LTL)” Species ............................ 60 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................. 62 Primary & secondary non-target species ........................................................ 62 Endangered, Threatened & Protected (ETP).................................................. 80 Habitats ......................................................................................................... 98 Ecosystems ................................................................................................. 106 Principle Three: Management System Background............................................. 109 Legal & Customary Framework .................................................................... 109 Page 2 of 380 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine Peer Review Draft Report FFA Finland Baltic Herring & Sprat Fishery Fishery management objectives................................................................... 117 Management systems and processes .......................................................... 118 Monitoring and evaluation ............................................................................ 125 5 Evaluation Procedure ................................................................................................. 126 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ........................................................................ 126 Harmonisation activities ............................................................................... 126 Comparison of scores .................................................................................. 127 Previous assessments ........................................................................................ 129 Assessment Methodologies ................................................................................ 129 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ............................................................... 130 Site Visits ..................................................................................................... 130 Consultations ............................................................................................... 130 Evaluation Techniques ................................................................................. 130 Risk Based Framework (RBF) Use .............................................................. 133 Scoring elements ......................................................................................... 135 6 Traceability ................................................................................................................ 138 Eligibility Date ..................................................................................................... 138 Traceability within the Fishery ............................................................................. 138 Trawl fishery UoAs ....................................................................................... 138 Trap fishery UoAs ........................................................................................ 139 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ...................................................... 140 Parties eligible to use the fishery certificate ................................................. 140 Point of change of ownership of product ...................................................... 140 List of eligible landing points ........................................................................ 140 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody ......................................................................................................... 141 7 Evaluation Results ..................................................................................................... 142 Principle Level Scores ........................................................................................ 142 Summary of PI Level Scores ............................................................................... 142 Summary of Conditions ....................................................................................... 142 Recommendations .............................................................................................. 142 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................. 142 Changes in the fishery prior to and since Pre-Assessment ................................. 143 8 References ................................................................................................................ 145 9 Appendix 1: Assessment Tree ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sprattus Fuegensis in the Inland Waters of Chiloe, Chile (Osteichthyes: Clupeiformes: Clupeidae)
    Gayana 71(1):71(1), 2007102-113, 2007 ISSN 0717-652X SPRATTUS FUEGENSIS EN AGUAS INTERIORES DE CHILOE, CHILE (OSTEICHTHYES: CLUPEIFORMES: CLUPEIDAE) SPRATTUS FUEGENSIS IN THE INLAND WATERS OF CHILOE, CHILE (OSTEICHTHYES: CLUPEIFORMES: CLUPEIDAE) Antonio Aranis R.1, Roberto Meléndez C.2, Germán Pequeño R.3 & Francisco Cerna T. 4 1Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Departamento de Evaluación de Pesquerías, Blanco 839, Valparaíso, Chile. Email: [email protected]. 2Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Casilla 787, Santiago, Chile 3Universidad Austral de Chile, Instituto de Zoología, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile 4Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Departamento de Especialidades Técnicas, Blanco 839, Valparaíso, Chile. RESUMEN Una especie de Clupeiformes que ha sido habitual en las capturas de la flota pesquera artesanal que opera en el mar interior de Chiloé, Chile, ha sido confundida con la sardina común (Strangomera bentincki) y la sardina española (Sardinops sagax musica), cuyas distribuciones geográficas en esta área marcan su límite austral. Mediante un análi- sis de morfometría y recuentos de estructuras duras de siete ejemplares capturados en julio de 2005 y provenientes del área de pesca de Quicaví, Chiloé (42º17’S-73º22’W), se determinó, que correspondían a seis Sprattus fuegensis (Jenyns 1842) (sardina fueguina), y que ella estaría presente hegemónicamente en las capturas del mar interior de Chiloé; en la X Región administrativa de Chile. Basado en la captura de especímenes de S. fuegensis obtenidos en las cercanías de la Isla Guar, al norte de Calbuco en octubre de 2005, se realizó una breve descripción de otolitos y una comparación del diámetro longitudinal del primer anillo hialino entre ambas sardinas, mediante el uso del test no paramétrico de Mann-Withney; del mismo modo, se comparó la relación longitud del pez con el diámetro del otolito para ambas sardinas utilizando un ANCOVA.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Tales
    Metabarcoding reveals different zooplankton communities in northern and southern areas of the North Sea Jan Niklas Macher, Berry B. van der Hoorn, Katja T. C. A. Peijnenburg, Lodewijk van Walraven, Willem Renema Supplementary tables 1-5 Table S1: Sampling stations and recorded abiotic variables recorded during the NICO 10 expedition from the Dutch Coast to the Shetland Islands Sampling site name Coordinates (°N, °E) Mean remperature (°C) Mean salinity (PSU) Depth (m) S74 59.416510, 0.499900 8.2 35.1 134 S37 58.1855556, 0.5016667 8.7 35.1 89 S93 57.36046, 0.57784 7.8 34.8 84 S22 56.5866667, 0.6905556 8.3 34.9 220 S109 56.06489, 1.59652 8.7 35 79 S130 55.62157, 2.38651 7.8 34.8 73 S156 54.88581, 3.69192 8.3 34.6 41 S176 54.41489, 4.04154 9.6 34.6 43 S203 53.76851, 4.76715 11.8 34.5 34 Table S2: Species list and read number per sampling site Class Order Family Genus Species S22 S37 S74 S93 S109 S130 S156 S176 S203 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia clausi 0 0 0 72 0 170 15 630 3995 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia tonsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Hydrozoa Trachymedusae Rhopalonematidae Aglantha Aglantha digitale 0 0 0 0 1870 117 420 629 0 Actinopterygii Trachiniformes Ammodytidae Ammodytes Ammodytes marinus 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 35 0 Copepoda Harpacticoida Miraciidae Amphiascopsis Amphiascopsis cinctus 344 0 0 992 2477 2500 9574 8947 0 Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Amphiuridae Amphiura Amphiura filiformis 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 1470 63233 Copepoda Calanoida Pontellidae Anomalocera Anomalocera patersoni 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bivalvia Venerida
    [Show full text]
  • Sprat Sprattus Sprattus Max Size: 16 Cm Family Clupeidae Max Age: 5 Years
    Sprat Sprattus sprattus Max size: 16 cm Family Clupeidae Max age: 5 years Introduction Taxonomy: European sprat Sprattus sprattus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Order: Clupeiformes, Family: Clupeidae) is one of five clupeids occurring in the North Sea. Three sub-species have been defined [1], namely S. sprattus sprattus in the North-East Atlantic and North Sea, S. sprattus balticus in the Baltic Sea and S. sprattus phalericus in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. Comm. common names Danish Brisling Icelandic Brislingur Dutch Sprot Latvian Bt tli a English Sprat Norwegian Brisling Estonian Kilu Polish Szprot Faroese Brislingur Portuguese Espadilha / Lavadilha Finnish Kilohaili Russian French Sprat Spanish Espadín German Sprott Swedish Skarpsill General: Sprat is a small-bodied pelagic schooling species that is most abundant in relatively shallow waters, including areas of low salinity such as the Baltic. It is an important food resource for many top predators. Sprat is mainly landed for industrial processing (often mixed with juvenile herring), but a small market exists for human consumption (smoked sprat and whitebait). Sprat may be confused with juvenile herring, but the relative positions of dorsal and pelvic fins, the grey rather than blue coloration on the dorsal side and the sharply toothed keel on the belly are clear distinguishing features. Minimum Landing Size: None. Distribution Biogeographical distribution: Sprat is widely distributed in the shelf waters of Europe and North Africa, ranging from Morocco to Norway, including the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Baltic Sea [1,2], but stays largely within the 50 m depth contour and is also common in inshore waters. Spatial distribution in North Sea: Sprat is most abundant south of the Dogger Bank and in the Kattegat (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Ecosystem-Level Trophic Cascade Effects Involving Gulf Menhaden (Brevoortia Patronus) Triggered by the Deepwater Horizon Blowout
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Evidence for Ecosystem-Level Trophic Cascade Effects Involving Gulf Menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) Triggered by the Deepwater Horizon Blowout Jeffrey W. Short 1,*, Christine M. Voss 2, Maria L. Vozzo 2,3 , Vincent Guillory 4, Harold J. Geiger 5, James C. Haney 6 and Charles H. Peterson 2 1 JWS Consulting LLC, 19315 Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK 99801, USA 2 Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3431 Arendell Street, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA; [email protected] (C.M.V.); [email protected] (M.L.V.); [email protected] (C.H.P.) 3 Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia 4 Independent Researcher, 296 Levillage Drive, Larose, LA 70373, USA; [email protected] 5 St. Hubert Research Group, 222 Seward, Suite 205, Juneau, AK 99801, USA; [email protected] 6 Terra Mar Applied Sciences LLC, 123 W. Nye Lane, Suite 129, Carson City, NV 89706, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-907-209-3321 Abstract: Unprecedented recruitment of Gulf menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) followed the 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout (DWH). The foregone consumption of Gulf menhaden, after their many predator species were killed by oiling, increased competition among menhaden for food, resulting in poor physiological conditions and low lipid content during 2011 and 2012. Menhaden sampled Citation: Short, J.W.; Voss, C.M.; for length and weight measurements, beginning in 2011, exhibited the poorest condition around Vozzo, M.L.; Guillory, V.; Geiger, H.J.; Barataria Bay, west of the Mississippi River, where recruitment of the 2010 year class was highest.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshop on the Identification of Clupeoid Larvae (WKIDCLUP)
    ICES WKIDCLUP REPORT 2014 SCICOM STEERING GROUP ON ECOSYSTEM SURVEYS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ICES CM 2014/SSGESST:04 Report of the Workshop on the identification of clupeoid larvae (WKIDCLUP) 1-5 September 2014 Hamburg, Germany International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2014. Report of the Workshop on the identification of clupeoid larvae (WKIDCLUP), 1-5 September 2014, Hamburg, Germany. ICES CM 2014/SSGESST:04. 36 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2014 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WKIDCLUP REPORT 2014 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 2 3 Clupeid Larvae identification and description ........................................................ 3 3.1 Herring Clupea
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei, Clupeiformes)
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Fall 2019 Global Conservation Status and Threat Patterns of the World’s Most Prominent Forage Fishes (Teleostei, Clupeiformes) Tiffany L. Birge Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Birge, Tiffany L.. "Global Conservation Status and Threat Patterns of the World’s Most Prominent Forage Fishes (Teleostei, Clupeiformes)" (2019). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/8m64-bg07 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/109 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREAT PATTERNS OF THE WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT FORAGE FISHES (TELEOSTEI, CLUPEIFORMES) by Tiffany L. Birge A.S. May 2014, Tidewater Community College B.S. May 2016, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 2019 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Sara Maxwell (Member) Thomas Munroe (Member) ABSTRACT GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREAT PATTERNS OF THE WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT FORAGE FISHES (TELEOSTEI, CLUPEIFORMES) Tiffany L. Birge Old Dominion University, 2019 Advisor: Dr. Kent E.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Control in Marine Food Webs
    Interaction between top-down and bottom-up control in marine food webs Christopher Philip Lynama, Marcos Llopeb,c, Christian Möllmannd, Pierre Helaouëte, Georgia Anne Bayliss-Brownf, and Nils C. Stensethc,g,h,1 aCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, United Kingdom; bInstituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Cádiz, E-11006 Cádiz, Andalusia, Spain; cCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway; dInstitute of Hydrobiology and Fisheries Sciences, University of Hamburg, 22767 Hamburg, Germany; eSir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, United Kingdom; fAquaTT, Dublin 8, Ireland; gFlødevigen Marine Research Station, Institute of Marine Research, NO-4817 His, Norway; and hCentre for Coastal Research, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway Contributed by Nils Chr. Stenseth, December 28, 2016 (sent for review December 7, 2016; reviewed by Lorenzo Ciannelli, Mark Dickey-Collas, and Eva Elizabeth Plagányi) Climate change and resource exploitation have been shown to from the bottom-up through climatic (temperature-related) in- modify the importance of bottom-up and top-down forces in fluences on plankton, planktivorous fish, and the pelagic stages ecosystems. However, the resulting pattern of trophic control in of demersal fish (11–13). Some studies, however, have suggested complex food webs is an emergent property of the system and that top-down effects, such as predation by sprat on zooplankton, thus unintuitive. We develop a statistical nondeterministic model, are equally important in what is termed a “wasp-waist” system capable of modeling complex patterns of trophic control for the (14).
    [Show full text]
  • Otolith Morphology of Sprat (Sprattus Sprattus) Along the Swedish West Coast
    Department of Aquatic Resources Otolith morphology of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) along the Swedish west coast Francesco Saltalamacchia Independent project in Biology – Master´s thesis • 30 credits Examensarbete/Master’s thesis Lysekil 2018 1 2 Otolith morphology of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) along the Swedish west coast Francesco Saltalamacchia Supervisor: Valerio Bartolino, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Resources Assistant supervisor: Florian Berg, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway Examiner: Michele Casini, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Resources Credits: 30 credits Level: Second cycle, A2E Course title: Independent project in Biology - Master's thesis Course code: EX0565 Course coordinating department: Department of Aquatic Resources Place of publication: Lysekil Year of publication: 2018 Cover picture: Francesco Saltalamacchia Online publication: https://stud.epsilon.slu.se Keywords: European sprat, otolith, shape analysis, wavelet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Aquatic Resources 3 4 Abstract The population structure of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in the Swedish Kattegat – Skagerrak has been at present not well investigated, and the boundaries between the management unit in this region and the larger stock occurring in the North Sea are also highly uncertain, posing issues to the successful management of the stock in this area. In this study, variations in otolith shape among several samples from the Swedish west coast, southern North Sea and Norwegian fjords north of Bergen were studied to investigate the effectiveness of shape analysis for characterise the population structure in the study area, and evaluate whether differences could be used to assign individual fish to their origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction Fisheries: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2018
    Reduction Fisheries: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2018 September 2018 Reduction Fisheries: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2018 Reduction Fisheries: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2018 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Report Authors: Pedro Veiga (coordination) | Senior Scientist, Science Unit, Systems Division | [email protected] Marina Mendes | FishSource Fisheries Analyst, Systems Division | [email protected] Blake Lee-Harwood | Programs Division Director | [email protected] Fisheries evaluations and revisions in FishSource: Marina Mendes (coordination), Mariana Bock, Christie Hendrich, Matthew Cieri, David Villegas, Patrícia Amorim, Alexia Morgan, Susana Segurado, Pedro Veiga Suggested improvement actions in FishSource: Megan Westmeyer (coordination), Christiane Schmidt, Dave Martin, Doug Beveridge, Enrique Alonso, Geoff Tingley, Pedro Ferreiro Scientific advice Pedro Sousa PHOTO CREDITS Bottom left: Image courtesy of surasakiStock at FreeDigitalPhotos.net © Sustainable Fisheries Partnership, September 2018 KEYWORDS BMSY; fisheries; FishSource; FMSY; forage; improvement; low trophic level; ecosystem-based fisheries management; reduction; stock status; supply chain; sustainability; target Sustainable Fisheries Partnership wishes to acknowledge the generous support of BioMar, Cargill/EWOS, and Skretting in the production of this report. DISCLAIMER This report was mainly prepared with information available from FishSource.org™, a program of Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP).
    [Show full text]
  • Harvesting Forage Fish Can Prevent Fishing-Induced Population
    Harvesting forage fish can prevent fishing-induced population collapses of large piscivorous fish Floor H. Soudijna,b,c,1 , P. Daniel¨ van Denderend , Mikko Heinoc,e,f , Ulf Dieckmannc,g , and Andre´ M. de Roosb,h aEcological Dynamics Group, Wageningen Marine Research, 1976 CP IJmuiden, The Netherlands; bInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands; cEvolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria; dCentre for Ocean Life, Technical University of Denmark Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; eDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5006 Bergen, Norway; fInstitute of Marine Research, 5005 Bergen, Norway; gDepartment of Evolutionary Studies of Biosystems, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan; and hSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501 Edited by Alan Hastings, University of California, Davis, CA, and approved December 16, 2020 (received for review October 1, 2019) Fisheries have reduced the abundances of large piscivores—such that are considered essential in models of fish communities are: as gadids (cod, pollock, etc.) and tunas—in ecosystems around 1) fish-population size structure, 2) consistent accounting of the the world. Fisheries also target smaller species—such as herring, bioenergetic flows through fish populations and communities, capelin, and sprat—that are important parts of the piscivores’ and 3) size-selective predation and harvesting (10, 11). diets. It has been suggested that harvesting of these so-called In this study, we investigate the effects of fishing for for- forage fish will harm piscivores. Multispecies models used for fish- age fish on their predators, the piscivorous fish.
    [Show full text]