DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Needs Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Needs Assessment Report Preliminary Needs Assessment Tulare Kern Funding Area Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Disadvantaged Community Involvement Program Tulare Kern Funding Area January 2019 Prepared for: County of Tulare 2800 West Burrell Avenue, Visalia, California 93291 Prepared by: Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group 130 N. Garden Street, Visalia, California 93291 COPYRIGHT 2019 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights to this document. This document is not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group In the event of unauthorized reuse of the information contained herein by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group's legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights. \\ppeng.com\pzdata\Clients\Tulare_County of-1399\139918001-DAC Involvement\_DOCS\Reports\Needs Assessment\2019-0108 Preliminary Needs Assessment.docx Tulare-Kern DACIP Preliminary Needs Assessment Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Area .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Goals ...................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Preliminary Needs Assessment ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Final Needs Assessment .............................................................................................................. 1-3 2 Project Approach ................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Definitions .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Database ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Database Development and Data Gathering ........................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Database Limitations .................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Assessment of Needs .................................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.4 Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Input .............................................................................................. 2-4 2.5 Ongoing Database Maintenance and Updates ....................................................................................... 2-5 3 Prior Studies and Reports ..................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Tulare Lake Basin DAC Water Study ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Kings Basin DAC Pilot Study ................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Integrated Regional Water Management Plans ...................................................................................... 3-3 4 Disadvantaged Communities ............................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Identification of DACs ............................................................................................................................... 4-1 5 Sources of Drinking Water Supply ..................................................................................................................... 5-1 6 Drinking Water Quality......................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Water Quality Compliance ......................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Water Quality Exceedance ...................................................................................................................... 6-11 6.3 Water Treatment Systems ....................................................................................................................... 6-10 7 Consolidated Systems ............................................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Consolidated Systems ................................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Mandatory Consolidation........................................................................................................................ 7-13 7.3 Potential Consolidation ........................................................................................................................... 7-14 8 Private Well Communities .................................................................................................................................... 8-1 9 Groundwater Level ................................................................................................................................................ 9-1 10 Surface Water Rights .......................................................................................................................................... 10-1 11 Wastewater Treatment Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 11-1 Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • January 2019 iii Tulare-Kern DACIP Preliminary Needs Assessment 11.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities ............................................................................................................ 11-1 11.2 CV-SALTS ................................................................................................................................................ 11-1 12 Septic Density Evaluation.................................................................................................................................. 12-1 13 Water and Sewer Rates ....................................................................................................................................... 13-1 14 Storm Water Facilities ........................................................................................................................................ 14-1 15 Funding Status ..................................................................................................................................................... 15-1 15.1 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund .................................................................................................. 15-2 15.2 Clean Water State Revolving Fund........................................................................................................ 15-3 15.3 Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Program ............................................................. 15-5 16 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 16-1 16.1 Summary of Findings ............................................................................................................................... 16-1 16.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 16-1 16.3 Areas of Additional Research / Next Steps ......................................................................................... 16-1 Appendices Appendix A Project Advisory Committee Meeting Schedule and Framework Appendix B Interim Drinking Water Program Funding Lists (2014-2015, 2015-2016) List of Tables Table 4-1. Summary of Communities .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Table 4-2. Disadvantaged Communities by IRWM ................................................................................................... 4-2 Table 5-1. Summary of DACs with a Single Source .................................................................................................. 5-1 Table 5-2. Disadvantaged Communities with a Single Water Source ..................................................................... 5-1 Table 6-1. Disadvantaged Communities - Compliance Status.................................................................................. 6-2 Table 6-2. Water Quality Exceedance .......................................................................................................................... 6-1 Table 7-1. Disadvantaged Communities – Consolidated Systems ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THEDMLY Surveyor Sending Pictures
    Distribution Weather THEDMLY CoMUrnM* suuMoe, milder today high In ». Clear and cool 31,175 tonight low Bear M. Moitly IUD- I Red Bank Area f ny and warmer tomorrow Mgh near 80. Outlook Saturday, fair Copyright—The Red Bank Register, Inc. 1966. and mild. MONMOUTH COUMTS HOME NEWSPAPER FOR 87 YEARS DIAL 741-0010 Iuued dally, Monaiy Uirouih rria«y. Mcond CUM PoiU«« THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 1966 VOL. 88, NO. 238 Pill it RH Bank and at AddlUonl Mallliur O(Ilc«». Jc PER COPY PAGE ONE Lands on Moon in First Try Surveyor Sending Pictures PASADENA, Calif. (AP) -| atively smooth, hard surface that on the craft astronauts will prominences, and some goug- tists that the surface might be •Surveyor 1, defying Jongsihot apparently suitable as a possi- use for a landing later in the ing, as if the surface had been deep dust or spongy lava that odds against a first-try success, ble descent point for future as- decade. struck by objects from space at could swallow a landing vehicle. televised earthward today strik- tronauts. A picture series beginning at an angle. 1 The 620-pound Surveyor plant- ing photos of the lunar land- The successful toudh-down, 5:45 a.m. EDT, using a different The pictures showed no dam- ed its three legs firmly on the scape alter a seemingly perfect executed precisely as pro- TV screen system ll»an that of age to the spidery, instrument- lunar crust at 2:17:37 a.m. gentle landing on the moon. grammed, was viewed as a long two earlier batches, snowed a jammed, craft 10 feet high and EDT, 63 hours and a quarter- The pictures indicated to sci- stride forward for the Unted broad plain devoid of major fea- 14 feet in diame<er.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Contaminants, Disease, and Nutrition
    For DFG use only RP Proposal Application F Proposal No. Region (Pages A13-A18) Section 1: Summary Information 1. Project title: Health of Threatened Fish: Role of Contaminants, Disease, and Nutrition 2. Applicant name: University of California at Davis 3. Contact person: Dr. Swee Teh 4. Address: VM:APCB, 1321 Haring Hall, University of California, Davis 5. City, State, Zip: Davis, CA 95616 6. Telephone #: (530) 754-8183 7. Fax #: (530) 752-7690 8. Email address: [email protected] 9. Agency Type: Federal Agency State Agency Local Agency Nonprofit Organization University (CSU/UC) Native American Indian Tribe 10. Certified nonprofit Yes No organization: 11. New grantee: Yes No 12. Amount requested: $953,448 13. Total project cost: $953,448 + in-kind services from DFG and USBR 14. Topic Area(s): Primary: At-Risk Species Assessment Secondary: Ecosystem Water and Sediment Quality, Estuary Food Web Productivity 15. ERP Project type: Primary: Research Secondary: Monitoring, Pilot/Demonstration 16. Ecosystem Element: Primary: Bay-Delta Aquatic Food Web Secondary: Contaminants, 17. Water Quality Primary: Toxicity of Unknown Origin and Contaminants Constituent: Secondary: Nutrients and Oxygen Depleting Substances 18. At-Risk species Threadfin shad (Dorosoma petenense), striped bass (Morone saxatilis), Sacramento benefited: splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus). 19. Project objectives: Determine the biological effects of contaminants, pathogens/diseases, and nutritional status in threatened pelagic fishes and establish baseline health 20. Time frame: 2 years (July 1st, 2011 - June 30th, 2013) ERP Proposal Application Form Section 2: Location Information 1. Township, Range, Section: and Please see 3. Location description the 7.5 USGS Quad map name. 2. Latitude, Longitude (in decimal Cache Slough degrees, Geographic, NAD83): Liberty Island – DR2068: 38.329, -121.693 Cache Slough: 38.295, -121.742 Barker Slough Pumping Plant: 38.276, -121.797 Cache Slough N.
    [Show full text]
  • Cache Slough Comprehensive Regional Planning: DRAFT Baseline Characterization Report for the Advancement of Proposition 1 Eligible Projects
    Cache Slough Comprehensive Regional Planning: DRAFT Baseline Characterization Report for the Advancement of Proposition 1 Eligible Projects DRAFT Final Phase 1 Report July 2017 Introduction 1 SECTION 1: Project Purpose and Objectives 3 Phase 1 Objectives 3 Related Programs 3 SECTION 2: Planning Process and Participants 5 CONTENTS CONTENTS Process and Roadmap 5 Related Activities 6 SECTION 3: Baseline Conditions and Data Tools 7 Data Management Tools 7 MapTerra 7 R Shiny 7 Data Review and Validation 7 Data Inclusion Criteria 7 Topic Areas 8 Agriculture 8 Water Management 11 Flood Management 15 Ecosystem 18 Other Land Use and Infrastructure 24 Data Integration and Visualization 26 SECTION 4: Major Topics and Issues 28 Phase 1 Purpose and Charter 28 Project Scale and Level of Detail 29 Participation, Engagement, and Communications 29 Data Sources and Accuracy 29 Relationship to Other Programs and Activities 30 Ecosystem Potential 30 Protection and Assurances for Afected Landowners and Resources 31 Phase 2 Purpose, Scope, and Schedule 31 SECTION 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 33 Findings and Conclusions 33 Collaborative Process 33 Data and Information Display and Visualization 34 Phase 2 Goals and Approach 35 Key Issues for Phase 2 35 Other Recommendations 36 Appendices 37 Appendix A – Phase 1 Participants 38 Appendix B – Project Overview 39 Appendix C – Draft High-level Management Issues and Questions 44 Appendix D – Agriculture Layers Metadata 46 Appendix E – Water Supply and Water Quality Layers Metadata 51 Appendix F – Flood Management Layers Metadata 55 Appendix G – Ecosystem Layers Metadata 58 Appendix H – Other Land Use and Infrastructure Layers Metadata 68 Introduction This report summarizes Phase 1 of the Cache Slough Comprehensive Regional Planning Project for the Advancement of Proposition 1 Eligible Projects (Cache Slough Planning Project).
    [Show full text]
  • Rebel Leader Flown to Ky Parley
    Weather Distribution Fair and warm through to- Today tight with highi ranging from THEDAILY mid 8«i to .70s along the shore 27,175 and lows tonight in the 60s. Variable cloudiness and cooler to- I Red Bank Area J morrow high* in the 70s. Sun- Copyright—The Red Bank Register, Inc. 1966. day's outlook, variable cloudi- DIAL 741-0010 ness and cool. MONMOUTH COUNTY'S HOME NEWSPAPER FOR 87 YEARS Issued duly, Mnnday throu»h Friday. Second Clan Pojtan FRIDAY, MAY 27, 1966 7c PER COPY PAGE ONE VOL. 88, NO. 235 Paid at K«d Bank and al Additional Malllnt Offices. Rebel Leader Flown to Ky Parley SAIGON (AP) — The leader of rebellious Vietnamese Army of the army's 1st Corps on March 10, met at tiie U. S. 1st and Thi together in hopes some agreement could be reached was held at the Marine headquarters. There were reports ttat forces in Hue, Lt. Gen. Nguyen Chanh Thi, was flown under a Marine Division's headquarters at Chu Lai, about 85 miles south which might lead to an easing of the political crisis. other members of Ky's ruling junta were present. U.S. guarantee of safety today to a seoret meeting with of Hue. A U. S. plane brought Thi from Hue »o Chu Lai to meet The evacuation of Americans from Hue, 400 miles north Premier Nguyen Cao Ky. Ky's dismissal of Thi, who controlled South Viet Nam's Ky, then flew him back to Hue after the meeting. of Saigon, followed the burning of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Arkstorm Scenario
    OOvveerrvviieeww ooff tthhee kkSSttoorrmm SScceennaarriioo AARR Open File Report 2010-1312 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey This page intentionally left blank Overview of the Arkstorm Scenario Prepared for the U.S. Geological Survey Multihazards Demonstration Project Lucile Jones, Chief Scientist Dale Cox, Project Manager By Keith Porter18, Anne Wein17, Charles Alpers17, Allan Baez1, Patrick Barnard17, James Carter17, Alessandra Corsi7, James Costner20, Dale Cox17, Tapash Das14, Michael Dettinger17, James Done12, Charles Eadie8, Marcia Eymann5, Justin Ferris17, Prasad Gunturi20, Mimi Hughes13, Robert Jarrett17, Laurie Johnson10, Hanh Dam Le-Griffin16, David Mitchell11, Suzette Morman17, Paul Neiman13, Anna Olsen18, Suzanne Perry17, Geoffrey Plumlee17, Martin Ralph13, David Reynolds13, Adam Rose19, Kathleen Schaefer6, Julie Serakos20, William Siembieda4, Jonath n Stock17, David Strong17, Ian Sue Wing2, Alex Tang9, Pete Thomas20, Ken Topping15, and Chris Wills3. a 1 B.A. Risk Management 11 M-Cubed 2 Boston University 12 National Center for Atmospheric Research 3 California Geological Survey 13 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 4 California Polytechnic State University 14 Scripps Institute of Oceanography 5 Center for Sacramento History 15 Topping Associates International 6 Federal Emergency Management Agency 16 TTW, Inc. 7 Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnologicas, Brazil 17 U.S. Geological Survey 8 Hamilton Swift Land Use and Development 18 University of Colorado at Boulder 9 L&T Consulting 19 University of
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Aquatic Habitat Potential of Flooded Polders in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta John R
    DECEMBER 2017 RESEARCH Evaluating the Aquatic Habitat Potential of Flooded Polders in The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta John R. Durand *, 1 NSBI predictions. Because flood probabilities and Volume 15, Issue 4 | Article 4 https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss4art4 repair prioritization analyses suggest that polders in the south Delta are most likely to flood and be * Corresponding author: [email protected] abandoned, without extensive intervention, much of 1 Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California–Davis, the Delta will become a freshwater lake ecosystem, Davis, CA 95616 dominated by alien species. Proactive management of flooded tracts will nearly always hedge risks, save money, and offer more functional habitats ABSTRACT in the future; however, without proper immediate incentives, it will be difficult to encourage strong Large tracts of land in the Sacramento–San Joaquin management practices. Delta are subsided because of agricultural practices, creating polders up to 10 m below sea level that are vulnerable to flooding. As protective dikes breach, KEY WORDS these become shallow, open-water habitats that Polder, flooded island, restoration, reconciliation will not resemble any historical state. I investigated ecology, novel ecosystems, Sacramento–San Joaquin physical and biotic drivers of novel flooded polder Delta habitat, using a Native Species Benefit Index (NSBI) to predict the nature of future Delta ecosystems. Results suggest that flooded polders in the north INTRODUCTION Delta will have the ecology and fish community Twentieth-century land-use practices have accelerated composition of a tidal river plain, those in the Cache– land subsidence and polder formation around the Lindsey Complex (CLC) will have that of a tidal globe, especially where land reclamation is combined backwater, those in the confluence of the Sacramento with intensive agriculture near rivers and estuaries and San Joaquin rivers a brackish estuary, and (McCreary et al.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Steps in to Block Merger of Banks LBJ Message to Be Cost Balancing Formula
    U.S. Steps in to Block Merger of Banks Weather SEE STORY BELOW Some cloudiness this morning then fair with gradually moder- ating temperatures this after- HOME noon, tonight and "tomorrow. High today 25 to JO, low tonight In low to mid-20s, high tomor- Red Bank, Freehold row la Ms. Outlook Friday, part- Long Branch FINAL ly cloudy, little temperature I 7 change. MONMOUTH COUNTY'S HOME NEWSPAPER FOR 89 YEARS DIAL 741-0010 VOL. 90 ,£JO. 142 RED BANK, N. J., WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 1968 10c PER COPY PAGE ONE LBJ Message to Be Cost Balancing Formula WASHINGTON (AP) — Presi- talks—a halt in U.S. bombing of ence for one-half hour after John- basis most commonly used before ed to rise another $4 billion, John- dent Johnson gives the nation to- the North and "other acts of ag- bill, a housing measure is likely financing Jheir children's school- son concludes his speech, and the advent of the unified budget- son obviously is faced with a need to be the next order of business. night his formula for balancing gression"—still was under ex- eight Republican governors will ing. was said to run between $145 bil- to alter the Capitol Hill-atmos- Administration sources predict- • Proposals for child health care Ihe financial demands of the Viet- haustive examination. jointly discuss the message with lion and $150 billion, compared nam war against the need to phere if he hopes for acceptance ed the President would support a for new and expectant mothers To an election-year Congress newsmen Thursday morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    California Department of Water Resources December 2019 Appendix A - Notice Of Preperation (NOP) and Initial Study. Lookout Slough Tidal Habitat Restoration and Flood Improvement Project Draft EIR SCH # 2019039136 California Department of Water Resources December 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Lookout Slough Tidal Habitat Restoration and Flood Improvement Project Draft EIR SCH # 2019039136 NOTICE OF PREPARATION Environmental Impact Report For the Lookout Slough Restoration Project March 21, 2019 INTRODUCTION The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is planning to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Lookout Slough Restoration Project. The Draft EIR will meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). DWR has issued this Notice of Preparation (NOP) to provide responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and other interested parties with information describing the proposal and its environmental effects. The Proposed Project described below would restore within the Proposed Project Site approximately 3,000 acres of tidal marsh that will help satisfy the Department’s obligations under Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) 4 of the 2008 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Delta Smelt Biological Opinion (BiOp) and consistent with RPA 1.6.1 of the 2009 National Marine Fisheries Service Salmonid BiOp for the coordinated operations of the State Water Project and the Central Valley Project. The Proposed Project would create habitat that is beneficial to wildlife including Delta Smelt, Giant Garter Snake (GGS), and other fish and wildlife species, and widen a portion of the Yolo Bypass to increase flood storage and conveyance, increase the resiliency of levees, and reduce flood risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park a History Susie Van Kirk
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Susie Van Kirk Papers Special Collections 9-2015 Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park A History Susie Van Kirk Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Van Kirk, Susie, "Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park A History" (2015). Susie Van Kirk Papers. 26. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Susie Van Kirk Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park History Boyes House at the Elk Prairie, August 2015 Prepared for: Susan Doniger District Interpretive Specialist North Coast Redwoods, California State Parks Prepared by: Susie Van Kirk Historic Resources Consultant PO Box 568 Bayside, Ca 95524 707-822-6066 [email protected] September 2015 Table of Contents Introduction For those who travel California’s north coast--visitors and locals alike—Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park [the Park] is the ultimate park experience. Uniquely situated, the Park includes ancient Redwoods, streams, ocean beaches with towering cliffs, and a large prairie surrounded by the giant trees, each with its own specially-adapted flora and fauna, the latter including salmon and steelhead, Roosevelt elk, and the elusive marbled murrelet. Through the foresight and vision of the Save-the-Redwoods League and the State of California, protection of these incomparable values became a reality through decades of fund raising and land purchases resulting in the present 14,000-acre Park.
    [Show full text]