DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 ( UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ( EASTERN DISTRICT OF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 ( UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ( EASTERN DISTRICT OF Case 1:00-cv-05332-JBW-SMG Document 203 Filed 10/22/02 Page 1 of 201 PageID #: <pageID> ( UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ( EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------){ In Re Simon II Litigation f:i ro. OO-CV-5332 --------------------------------JC Mr,} ( h·· Rle ate d to No. 98-CV-0675 No. 98-CV-1492 No. 98-CV-3287 ( No. 99-CV-1988 No. 99-CV-6142 No. OO-CV-2340 No. OO-CV-4442 ~No. OO-CV-4632 ID No. 02-CV-0599 AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER APPEARANCES: Plaintiffs Attorneys: Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein, LLP 780 Third A venue, 49th Floor New York, New York 10017-2004 By: Steven E. Fineman, Esq. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein 275 Battery Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 By: Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Esq. Richard M. Heimann, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 180 Maiden Lane, 17th. Floor New York, New York 10038 By: Perry Weitz, Esq. John M. Broadus, Esq. 1 (___ Case 1:00-cv-05332-JBW-SMG Document 203 Filed 10/22/02 Page 2 of 201 PageID #: <pageID> ( Brown Rudnick Freed & Gesmer One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 By: M. Frederick Pritzker, Esq. Gregory T. Arnold, Esq. Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co. 1513 Central Trust Tower Fourth and Vine Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 By: Stanley M. Chesley, Esq. Spohrer Wilner Maciejewski & Matthews P.A. 701 West Adams Street, Suite 2 Jacksonville, Florida 32204 By: Norwood Wilner, Esq. Roda & Nast, P.C. 801 Estelle Drive Lancaster, PA 17601 By: Dianne M. Nast, Esq. Defendant Philip Morris Inc.: Arnold & Porter Thurman Arnold Building 5555 Twelfth St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 By: Murray R. Garnick, Esq. David S. Eggert, Esq. Heather Pigman, Esq. Eric Suter, Esq. J. Benjamin King, Esq. Defendant R. J. Reynolds: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue North Point 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-1190 By: Theodore M. Grossman, Esq. Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001-2113 By: Robert H. Klonoff, Esq. Michael Fried, Esq. 2 Case 1:00-cv-05332-JBW-SMG;~·­ Document 203 Filed 10/22/02 Page 3 of 201 PageID #: ( \ <pageID> Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue 222 East 41 st Street c New York, New York 10017 By: Harold K. Gordon, Esq. George Kostolampros, Esq. Defendant Brown & Williamson: Kir:\cland & Ellis ( Citicorp Center 153 East 53rd St. New York, New York 10022-4675 By: Peter Bellacosa, Esq. ( Kirkland & Ellis Amoco Building 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60606 By: David Bernick, Esq. \' Defendant Lorillard Tobacco Co.: Greenberg, Traurig, LLP 885 Third Avenue, 21st Floor New York, New York 10022 By: Alan Mansfield, Esq. ( Stephen L. Saxl, Esq. Defendant BAT mdustries, p.1.c.: Simpson Thacher & Bartlett 425 Lexington A venue New York, NY 10017-3954 By: Peter Shapiro, Esq. Defendants Liggett Group me., Liggett & Meyers, me., and certain of its affiliates where ( applicable: Kasowtiz Benson Torres & Friedman 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019-6799 By: Aaron H. Marks, Esq. Leonard A. Feiwus, Esq. ( '~ JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Court Judge: ( Table of Contents \.._, 3 - ,,-- . Case 1:00-cv-05332-JBW-SMGI Document 203 Filed 10/22/02 Page 4 of 201 PageID #: \ <pageID> I. Introduction ............................................................ 6 A. General Considerations ............................................... 6 1. Equity ....................................................... 6 2. Punitive Damages ............................................. 12 B. The Instant Case . 14 II. Summary ............................................................. 17 A. Options Selected ................................................... 18 B. Possible Permutations ................................................ 19 1. Punitive Damages ............................................ 19 2. Compensatory Damages ........................................ 20 3. Advantages and Disadvantages .................................. 20 ill. Facts ................................................................. 24 A. Physical Effect of Tobacco ............................................ 24 B. Industry Conspiracy ................................................. 30 1. Formation and Execution ...................................... 30 2. Public statements from the 1950s to the present ..................... 36 3. Knowledge from the 1950s to the present .......................... 40 4. Coverup .................................................... 44 5. Other Deceptive Conduct ....................................... 47 C. Consumer Harm from Deceptive Practices ............................... 53 1. Knowledge that Consumers Would Act Upon Deceptive Practices ....... 54 2. Evidence that Misrepresentations Caused Consumers Harm ............ 55 a. Expert testimony ..................................... 5 5 (1) Dr. Jon Krosnick ............................... 55 (2) Dr. Jeffery Harris and others ...................... 58 b. Videotaped depositions ................................ 60 c. Surveys, medical and psychological literature and documents .. 63 IV. Procedural History ...................................................... 64 A. Individual Plaintiff cases ............................................. 64 1. Simon I ..................................................... 64 2. Decie ....................................................... 65 3. Ebert ....................................................... 66 4. Browne ..................................................... 66 5. Simon II .................................................... 66 B. Blue Cross Cases ................................................... 67 1. Empire Blue Cross ............................................ 67 2. Other Blue Cross plans ......................................... 68 C. Union Health fund cases .............................................. 69 1. National Asbestos Workers ..................................... 69 2. Bergeron .................................................... 70 D. Asbestos cases ..................................................... 71 1. H.K. Porter .................................................. 71 2. Raymark ...................................................... 71 . 4 Case 1:00-cv-05332-JBW-SMG Document 203 Filed 10/22/02 Page 5 of 201 PageID #: <pageID> ( 3. Falise ....................................................... 72 E. Mason (Medicare) .................................................. 72 F. Foreign Entities .................................................... 74 G. Tobacco Cases Nationwide ........................................... 74 H. Difficulty in Prosecuting Tobacco Lawsuits .............................. 81 V. Substantive Law ........................................................ 82 A. Fraud and Conspiracy ................................................ 82 B. Preemption ........................................................ 87 C. Statute of Limitations ................................................ 91 1. In general ................................................... 91 2. Relation Back ................................................ 94 D. Res Judicata ....................................................... 99 E. Individualized Proof of Causation and Damages ........................... 99 1. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence ..................... 102 2. Appropriateness of Sampling and Survey Techniques ................ 105 3. Due Process ................................................ 112 4. Jury Right .................................................. 116 5. Erie ....................................................... 123 VI. Punitive Damages ..................................................... 126 A. Principles ........................................................ 126 B. Caps ............................................................ 134 1. Supreme Court Cases ......................................... 134 2. Applications .................. : ............................. 136 VII. Choice of Law ........................................................ 140 A. In General ........................................................ 140 B. New York Rule of Babcock v. Jackson and Interest Analysis ................ 143 C. Application of Babcock Rules to Complex Fact Patterns ................... 144 ,. D. Constitutional Limits ............................................... 158 \ E. Interest Analysis in This Case ........................................ 159 VIII. Class Certification Analysis .............................................. 169 A. General Requirements .............................................. 170 1. Requirements of Rule 23 ...................................... 170 2. Subclassing ................................................. 175 3. Methods of Modem Notice .................................... 177 4. Special Requirements for Limited Fund Actions .................... 179 5. Limited Fund Class Action Based on Constitutional Caps ............ 180 B. 23(f) Review ...................................................... 185 C. Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ......................... 186 D. Jury Trial ........................................................ 186 E. Rule 23 Findings of Fact ............................................ 190 1. Numerosity ................................................. 190 2. Commonality ............................................... 190 3. Typicality ............... ·.................. · ................. 191 5 Case 1:00-cv-05332-JBW-SMG Document 203 Filed 10/22/02 / Page 6 of 201 PageID #: <pageID> ( 4. Adequacy of Representation ...................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • College To. Initiate Religious the Nts, J\'Laster's Degrees in Emphasis Period
    Ill ·"'n the half VOLUME XLVI * Wake Forest CoUege, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Monday, February 6, 196f * * NUMBER 15 and I fYI­ -y de- College To. Initiate Religious the nts, J\'laster's Degrees In Emphasis Period . Arts, I An-d Sciences Wake Forest College will resume 1~o Begin oiifering the .master's degree in six deparitments in the School of By CAROL YOUNG Arts and Sciences and will, for OG&B STAFF WRITER the first time, offer the dOctorate in February 12-16 has been de­ one department in the · Bowman signated Religion-in-Life Week by Gray School of Medicine this fall, Wake Forest students. President Harold W. Tribble an­ The weeks' activities have been nounced last week. planned with the aid and sugges­ President oftibble also announced tions of students active in various the ·appointment of Dr. Henry S. phases of cacrnpus life. All person­ Stroupe, chairman of tt:he depart­ nel invited to participate on the ment of history, as director of the program were suggested to the division of graduate studies.· The Chaplain by students.· appointment is effective immedi­ The theme for the week, chosen ately.) by the students, is defined by these The faculty of the School of Arts four questions: Does the Christian and Sciences discontinued admit­ faith have revelance to the college ting candidates for the master's situation now? Is there a meaning­ DR. WILLIAM EUGENE., degree in 1949 when expanding en­ ful basis for faith? Is the rejection physics, died January 24 at his following a long r~llment increased the student­ of what we often think of as an illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 06
    Annual Report and Accounts 06 Annual Review and Summary Financial Statement and Directors’ Report and Accounts 2006 WorldReginfo - 98675577-a5f8-41aa-ac01-37c1b8bcb2da About this combined Report The format of our reporting has been changed to accommodate the inclusion, for the first time, of an Operating and Financial Review (OFR). In preparing the OFR, we have sought to take into account, where considered appropriate, the best practice set out in the UK Accounting Standards Board’s ‘Reporting Statement: Operating and Financial Review’. We have responded to the spirit of the OFR by offering shareholders a balanced and comprehensive analysis of our current business and describing the significant industry trends that are likely to influence our future prospects. For the first time, we have published our Key Performance Indicators, some other important Business Measures and the Group’s Key Risk Factors. We have also attempted to avoid having too much information in one publication. Our corporate website bat.com has a wealth of material about the Group and, in May 2007, we plan to publish our latest Social Report, detailing progress during 2006 on a range of commitments and actions. We will carefully consider the structure and content of our future reporting in the light of developments in the field and the advice and comments we receive about this publication. The full content of this combined Report is under this flap. Leave it open as a reference to find your way to the different topics covered. Cautionary Statement: the Operating and Financial Review and certain other sections of this document contain forward looking statements which are subject to risk factors associated with, among other things, the economic and business circumstances occurring from time to time in the countries and markets in which the Group operates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Side of Marketing Seemingly “Light” Cigarettes: Successful Images and Failed Fact R W Pollay, T Dewhirst
    i18 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18 on 1 March 2002. Downloaded from The dark side of marketing seemingly “Light” cigarettes: successful images and failed fact R W Pollay, T Dewhirst ............................................................................................................................. Tobacco Control 2002;11(Suppl I):i18–i31 Objective: To understand the development, intent, and consequences of US tobacco industry advertis- ing for low machine yield cigarettes. Methods: Analysis of trade sources and internal US tobacco company documents now available on various web sites created by corporations, litigation, or public health bodies. Results: When introducing low yield products, cigarette manufacturers were concerned about maintaining products with acceptable taste/flavour and feared consumers might become weaned from See end of article for smoking. Several tactics were employed by cigarette manufacturers, leading consumers to perceive fil- authors’ affiliations tered and low machine yield brands as safer relative to other brands. Tactics include using cosmetic ....................... (that is, ineffective) filters, loosening filters over time, using medicinal menthol, using high tech imagery, using virtuous brand names and descriptors, adding a virtuous variant to a brand’s product line, and Correspondence to: Richard W Pollay, Faculty generating misleading data on tar and nicotine yields. of Commerce and Business Conclusions: Advertisements of filtered and low tar cigarettes were intended
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Reynolds (’64): Courage / Debate’S a Knockout / Michele Gillespie on R.J
    EDWARD REYNOLDS (’64): COURAGE / DEBATE’S A KNOCKOUT / MICHELE GILLESPIE ON R.J. & KATHARINE REYNOLDS SPRING 2013 FEATURES 18 ODE TO REYNOLDA GARDENS The natural beauty and serenity of Reynolda Gardens are celebrated by the Gardener, the Walker, the Poet and the Photographer. 2 52 COURAGE TO CHANGE A Golf’sWINNING most charming TEAM couple, Webb and Dowd Simpson, began CAMPUS theirBy partnership Lisa at Kline Mowry (’82) Wake Forest, cheered By Linda Carter Brinson (’69, P ’00) on by friends and family. BY LISWebbA KLINE MOWRy (’82)(’08) and Dowd (’07) Simpson Edward Reynolds (’64) did not come to are golf’s most charming twosome — Wake Forest because it was his best chance in love, in life and on the PGA tour. to get a good education. He came to fulfill a mission for justice and equality. 58 10 WHAT IT TAKES By Kerry M. King (’85) THINK HARD. TALK FAST. YIKES. ‘What outrages you?’ Undergraduate appli- By Cherin C. Poovey (P ’08) cants, and alumni, offer some profound answers to provocative questions. An introvert discovers and embraces the wonders of Wake Forest Debate. 92 42 CONSTANT AND TRUE POWER COUPLE By Barbee Myers Oakes (’80, MA ’81) By Michele Gillespie The greatest family value: Vision is more R.J. Reynolds loved his wife, Katharine essential than sight. Smith Reynolds, with the abandon of a far younger man with far fewer responsibilities, writes Kahle Family Professor of History Michele Gillespie in her new book. DEPARTMENTS 48 | DEACS IN LOVE 62 Around the Quad By Jane Bianchi (’05) 64 | Philanthropy Lifelong friendships, for sure.
    [Show full text]
  • Reynolds American Inc. Announces Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders
    Reynolds American Inc. P.O. Box 2990 Winston-Salem, NC 27102-2990 Contact: Investor Relations: Robert Bannon Media: David Howard RAI 2017-12 (336) 741-3359 (336) 741-3489 Reynolds American Inc. announces notice of special meeting of shareholders WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. – June 14, 2017 – A special meeting of shareholders of Reynolds American Inc. (NYSE: RAI) will be held at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on July 19, 2017, in the Reynolds American Plaza Building Auditorium at RAI’s corporate offices, 401 N. Main Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101. At the special meeting, shareholders will be asked to take action, among other things: to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, including the plan of merger contained therein, dated as of January 16, 2017, as amended as of June 8, 2017, and as may be further amended from time to time (the “merger agreement”), pursuant to which RAI will become an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BAT); and to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation payments that will or may be paid by RAI or BAT to RAI’s named executive officers and that are based on or otherwise relate to the proposed transaction and the agreements and understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become payable. Shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 12, 2017, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions as set out in the merger agreement, including approval by shareholders of both BAT and RAI, it is currently expected that the proposed transaction will close on or about July 25, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine & the Modern Lung Cancer Epidemic
    Michigan Tobacco-Free Institute “Nicotine and the Modern Lung Cancer Epidemic: The True Story” Clifford E. Douglas, Esquire Consultant to the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project November 9, 2000 Not long ago, I spoke at a lung cancer symposium in Louisville, Kentucky, at the Jewish Hospital Heart and Lung Institute. The Jewish Hospital is just a few blocks down the street from the headquarters of the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Company, the alma mater of Jeff Wigand. During my talk, I observed that there was definitely something peculiar in our situation. Pointing out the window, I said, “You know, if that building …” – referring to the Brown and Williamson Tower, which was visible from where we were convened for the conference – “… if that building wasn’t there, this building probably wouldn’t be here.” Of course, some might suggest that an equally strange situation exists in Michigan, where all of us work hard to counter the effects of cigarette smoking on our communities, while powerful tobacco industry allies in Lansing have helped the industry maintain its sales and profits by blocking meaningful attempts to regulate such things as smoking in restaurants and youth access to tobacco products. I am very proud of our state, but this is obviously a serious problem. In short, we have our work cut out for us. One way that we are addressing this challenge is through the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project, a venture sponsored by MDCH’s Tobacco Section and run by our good friend Jim Bergman at the Center for Social Gerontology in Ann Arbor.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Perched Over Single Brothers Bar, “Jenna” Keeps Watch Over the Swelling Vitality of Trade Street in Winston-Salem
    NORTH CAR OLINA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina Perched over Single Brothers Bar, “Jenna” keeps watch over the swelling vitality of Trade Street in Winston-Salem. Created by world-renowned body painter Cheryl Ann Lipstreu and installed as part of the Art for Arts Sake (AFAS) jenna Group’s “Mannequin Shenanigans” public art campaign in 2013, she has welcomed many new establishments to the neighborhood including: Mast General Store, Mission Pizza Napoletana, Broad Brand Distillery, Black Mountain Chocolate and Big Winston Lounge. AFAS has been instrumental in building a sense of community in Winston-Salem through their mission to “build, educate and celebrate community through art.” II NORTH CAR OLINA The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is prepared by Financial Management Services. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 2015•2016 WINSTON-SALEM,City of Winston-Salem, NORTH CAROLINA North CarolinaIII CREATIVE DIRECTION AND COPY Rachel Barron, Next Level Communications DESIGN AND ART DIRECTION LinTaylor Marketing Group, Inc. PRINTING credits Keiger Graphic Communications PHOTOGRAPHY Wings Over Winston Visit Winston-Salem Jeff Silkstone Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art UNCSA Film Village The City of Winston-Salem Marketing Department Rachel Barron Will & Deni McIntyre Daniel Alvarez/Twin City Stage IV City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Introductory Section Page Letter of Transmittal . .2 Local Economy . .4 Community Profile . .14 GFOA Certificate of Achievement. 31 Organizational Chart . 32 City Officials . 33 Financial Section Exhibit Page Independent Auditor’s Report .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
    CITY OF Winston-SalemNORTH CAROLINA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 I Winston-SalemNORTH CAROLINA CITY OF Winston-SalemNORTH CAROLINA II 2020 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is prepared by Financial Management Services. III Winston-SalemNORTH CAROLINA creditsCREATIVE DIRECTION & COPYWRITING Rachel Barron, Next Level Communications DESIGN & ART DIRECTION LinTaylor Marketing Group, Inc. PRINTING Salem One PHOTOGRAPHY Novant Health Rachel Barron The City of Winston-Salem Marketing Department Peter J. Mueller, UNCSA UNC School of the Arts Traci Arney Photography Winston-Salem Symphony IV 2020 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Introductory Section Page Letter of Transmittal 2 Local Economy 4 Community Profile 16 GFOA Certificate of Achievement 33 Organizational Chart 34 City Officials 35 Financial Section Exhibit Page Report of Independent Auditor 36 Management’s Discussion & Analysis 38 Basic Financial Statements 47 Government-wide Financial Statements – Statement of Net Position 1 48 – Statement of Activities 2 50 Fund Financial Statements – Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds 3 52 – Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 3 1 53 – Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds 4 54 – Reconciliation
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Control in California, 2007-2014: a Resurgent Tobacco Industry While Inflation Erodes the California Tobacco Control Program
    Tobacco Control in California, 2007-2014: A Resurgent Tobacco Industry While Inflation Erodes the California Tobacco Control Program Elizabeth Cox, BA Rachel Barry, MA Stanton A. Glantz, PhD Richard Barnes, JD Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 October 2014 Tobacco Control in California, 2007-2014: A Resurgent Tobacco Industry While Inflation Erodes the California Tobacco Control Program Elizabeth Cox, BA Rachel Barry, MA Stanton A. Glantz, PhD Richard Barnes, JD Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 October 2014 Supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grant CA-61021 and UCSF funds. Opinions expressed reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the sponsoring agency. This report is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4jj1v7tv Reports on other states are available at http://tobacco.ucsf.edu/states and for other countries at http://escholarship.org/uc/search?entity=ctcre_tcpmi. 1 2 Executive Summary • California's position as a leader in tobacco control is under threat by the resurgence of the tobacco industry, the emergence of new unregulated tobacco products, and the decreasing spending power of the tobacco control program. • Countering a resurging tobacco industry will require advocates to be much more visible and assertive in challenging politicians who take tobacco money. • Progress on tobacco control has been concentrated at the local level where policymakers are relatively more sensitive to public support for public health and less susceptible to industry campaign contributions and lobbyists.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Public Filing1
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) and ) ) TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ACTION FUND, ) Civil Action AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, AMERICAN ) No. 99-CV-02496 (GK) HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN LUNG ) ASSOCIATION, AMERICANS FOR ) Next scheduled court appearance: NONSMOKERS' RIGHTS, and NATIONAL ) (none scheduled) AFRICAN AMERICAN TOBACCO ) PREVENTION NETWORK ) ) Intervenors, ) ) v. ) ) REDACTED FOR PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, et al. ) PUBLIC FILING1 ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES' FINAL PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT (Incorporating Errata of August 16, 2005) 1Information designated by Defendants as "Confidential" pursuant to Order #7, Order #36, and Order #638 in the above-captioned action has been redacted. Order #7 allows each Defendant to designate as "Confidential" such information, document or material that it in good faith believes "derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure and use; and is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy;" or information otherwise entitled to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Order #36 allows each Defendant to designate as "Confidential" information that is entitled to protection pursuant to Order #7 and meets the further requirement that it is "so proprietary or competitively sensitive that its disclosure to a competitor would cause irreparable competitive injury." Order #638 supplements and adds to the provisions of Orders #7 and #36 and sets forth procedures for "any party wishing to make confidentiality designations for Information and/or Designated Prior Testimony." TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People Profits
    cov2 12/4/02 3:21 PM Page 1 PEOPLE PROFITS OVER OVER PEOPLE PROFITS Tobacco Industry Activities to Market Cigarettes and Undermine Public Health in Latin America and the Caribbean PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION Regional Office of the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Division of Health Promotion and Protection Program on Mental Health Unit on Tobacco, Alcohol and Other Drugs 525 Twenty-third Street, N.W. Washington DC 20037, U.S.A. www.paho.org Pan American Health Organization PAHO PROFITS OVER PEOPLE Tobacco Industry Activities to Market Cigarettes and Undermine Public Health in Latin America and the Caribbean Pan American Health Organization November 2002 CONTENTS Acknowledgements . .5 Executive Summary . .7 I. Introduction . .13 Methods . .16 Internet . .16 Guildford Depository . .17 Limitations . .17 References . .18 II. Plans and Strategies . .19 Strategic Directions . .21 Lobbying . .23 Lobbying of Governments . .24 Lobbying of International Organizations . .24 BAT’s Public Affairs Resource Group (PARG) . .25 Courting the Media . .27 Media Symposia . .27 Global Messages, Delivered Locally . .30 Journalists’ Trips . .31 Allies or Competitors? . .31 Conclusion . .32 References . .33 III. Secondhand Smoke . .39 The Tobacco Industry and Passive Smoking . .39 Tobacco Industry SHS Strategies in Latin America . .39 The ETS Consultancy Program and the Latin Project . .42 Shifting the Debate: Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality . .44 The Brazilian Air Force Ministry Aircraft Study . .45 The CIESPAL Seminar . .45 Other Seminars and Institutions . .46 Latin America SHS and Air Quality Survey . .47 FUSADES . .48 Spreading the Word . .48 Back to Basics: Denial, Preemption, and “Accommodation” . .49 Lessons for the Future . .50 References . .51 IV. Promotion and Marketing .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix III
    Case 1:99-cv-02496-GK Document 5732 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 33 Appendix III THE ALLEGED RACKETEERING ACTS 1. Racketeering Act No. 1: On or about January 4, 1954, defendants PHILIP MORRIS, REYNOLDS, BROWN & WILLIAMSON, LORILLARD, AMERICAN, and co-conspirators caused to be placed in numerous newspapers nationwide, including The Washington Post, a daily newspaper, an advertisement entitled "A Frank Statement To Smokers," which newspaper was then sent and delivered by the United States Mails to subscribers and others. In this advertisement, defendants promised to safeguard the health of smokers, support disinterested research into smoking and health, and reveal to the public the results of research into the effects of smoking on smokers' health. 2. Racketeering Act No. 2: On or about July 15, 1957, defendants PHILIP MORRIS, REYNOLDS, BROWN & WILLIAMSON, LORILLARD, and AMERICAN, through the TOBACCO INDUSTRY RESEARCH COMMITTEE (predecessor to defendant COUNCIL FOR TOBACCO RESEARCH), did knowingly cause a press release entitled "Scientist Comments on Benzypyrene Report" to be sent and delivered by the United States Mails to newspapers and news outlets. This press release disputed the United States Surgeon General's report that Benzypyrene had been identified in cigarette smoke, and stated that scientists had "generally concluded" that Benzypyrene in cigarette smoke cannot be a cause of cancer in smokers. 3. Racketeering Act No. 3: On or about November 27, 1959, defendants PHILIP MORRIS, R.J. REYNOLDS, BROWN & WILLIAMSON, LORILLARD, and AMERICAN, through defendant TOBACCO INSTITUTE, did knowingly cause a press release to be sent and delivered by the United States Mails to newspapers and news outlets.
    [Show full text]