Star Fleet Battles Table of Contents R8.0 Orion Pirates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Star Fleet Battles Table of Contents R8.0 Orion Pirates STAR FLEET BATTLES TABLE OF CONTENTS R8.0 THE ORION PIRATES BASIC SET R8.1 ORION BACKGROUND R8.R0 ORION FLEET REFITS R8.R1 ORION MINELAYER REFIT R8.R2 ORION DRONE RACKS R8.R3 ORION OPTION MOUNT FIRING ARCS R8.R4 ORION CLOAKING DEVICE REFIT R8.R5 ORION PLASMA RACK REFIT R8.R6 ORION SHIELD REFIT MODULE J R8.R7 ORION CARRIER ESCORTS MODULE R2 R8.R7 ORION CARRIER ESCORT AEGIS COST (UPDATE) BASIC SET R8.2 ORION LIGHT CRUISER (CR) ADVANCED MISSIONS R8.3 ORION HEAVY CRUISER (CA) R8.4 ORION SALVAGE CRUISER (SAL) R8.5 ORION SLAVER FREIGHTER (SLVR) MODULE J R8.6 ORION LIGHT CARRIER (CVL) ADVANCED MISSIONS R8.7 ORION LIGHT RAIDER (LR) ADVANCED MISSIONS (AND MOD M) R8.8 ORION VIKING (VIK) MODULE K R8.9 ORION PF TENDER (PFT) ADVANCED MISSIONS R8.10 ORION FREE TRAITOR (FT) R8.11 ORION FREIGHTERS R8.12 ORION Q-SHIPS R8.13 ORION BATTLE RAIDER (BR) ORION ENERGY ALLOCATION FORM MODULE R2 R8.14 ORION DOUBLE RAIDER (DBR) R8.15 ORION OK6 CRUISER (OK6) MODULE R2 (AND J) R8.16 ORION STRIKE CARRIER (CVS) MODULE R2 R8.17 ORION HEAVY BATTLECRUISER (BCH) R8.18 ORION WAR DESTROYER (DW) MODULE K (AND R2) R8.19 ORION BATTLE PF TENDER (BRP) MODULE R2 R8.20 ORION HEAVY RAIDER (HR) R8.21 ORION MEDIUM RAIDER (MR) R8.22 ORION ATTACK RAIDER (AR) R8.23 ORION LIGHT RAIDER SCOUT (LRS) R8.24 ORION WAR DESTROYER SCOUT (DWS) R8.25 ORION DOUBLE RAIDER PF TENDER (DBP) STAR FLEET BATTLES TABLE OF CONTENTS MODULE R5 R8.26 ORION DREADNOUGHT (DN) R8.27 ORION BATTLECRUISER (BC) R8.28 ORION FLEET CARRIER (CV) R8.29 ORION HEAVY BATTLE RAIDER (BRH) OPTIONAL WEAPONS CHART MODULE R6 (AND MOD M) R8.30 ORION BATTLE COMANDO RAIDER (BRC) MODULE R6 R8.31 ORION DOUBLE RAIDER CRUISER (DCR) R8.32 ORION MOBIL CARRIER (DWV) R8.33 ORION FAST CARRIER RESUPPLY RAIDER (FCR) R8.34 ORION HEAVY WAR DESTROYER (HDW) ORION MILLITARY RANKS MODULE R6 (AND MOD M) R8.M1 ORION “HORDE” ORGANIZATION MODULE R6 R8.M2 ORION CRIME TEAMS “SUCH A WASTE” –ORION FICTION MODULE R7 R8.35 ORION HEAVY CARRIER (CVA) R8.36 ORION SPACE CONTROL SHIP (SCS) R8.37 ORION BATTLE CARRIER (BCV) R8.38 ORION BATTLE CONTROL SHIP (BCS) R8.39 ORION SALVAGE STRIKE CARRIER (LVS) R8.40 ORION SALVAGE CONTRO SHIP (SGS) BOARDING PARTY TABLE MASTER SHIP CHART MODULE R10 R8.41 ORION INTERDICTION CARRIER (CVD) R8.42 ORION PATROL CARRIER (CVP) R8.43 ORION SCOUT CARRIER (CSV) R8.44 ORION SLAVER ESCORT CARRIER (SVL) R8.45 ORION HEAVY BATTLE CARRIER (BHV) R8.46 ORION HEAVY BATTLE FAST PATROL SHIP TENER (BHP) MODULE R9 R8.47 ORION NATIONAL POLICE DESTROYER (DD) R8.48 ORION NATIONAL POLICE CARIER (DV) R8.49 ORION HEAVY DREADNOUGHT (DNH) R8.50 ORION LIGHT DREADNOUGHT (DNL) R8.51 ORION MAULER BATTLE RAIDER (BRM) R8.52 ORION HEAVY FLEET TRANSPORT (TUG) R8.53 PODS USED BY THE ORIONS MODULE R11 R8.54 ORION PRIME TRAITOR (OPT) R8.55 ORION LIGHT PF TENDER (DWP) GENERAL NOTES ON SHIP CLASSES: DIVISION CONTROL SHIPS AND MINI-TUGS MODULE R11 R8.56 ORION HEAVY BATTLE RAIDER (HBR) R8.57 ORION WAR RAIDER (WR) MODULE J R8.F ORION FIGHTERS R8.F1 ORION FIGHTERS R8.F2 ORION MULTI-ROLE SHUTTLES R8.F3 ORION SWAC SHUTTLES R8.F4 ORION CLOAKED DECOY SHUTTLES STAR FLEET BATTLES TABLE OF CONTENTS MODULE K R8.PF ORION FAST PAROL SHIPS R8.PF0 ORION BRIGAND INTERCEPTOR (BRG) R8.PF1 ORION BUCANEER FAST PATROL SHIP (BUC) R8.PF1A OPTIONAL WEAPONS MOUNTS R8.PF1B SUICIDE BOMB R8.PF1C NON-STANDARD FLOTILLAS MODULE R11 R8.PF7 ORION WORKBOAT (WB) MODULE R11 R8.PF8 ORION SURVEY FAST PAROL SHIP (BUC-Q) R8.PF9 ORION RECOVERY FAST PAROL SHIP (BUC-Q) MODULE X1 R8.200 ORION PIRATE FIRST-GENERATION X-SHIPS R8.201 ORION HEAVY CRUISER (CX) R8.202 ORION RAIDER CRUISER (CRX) R8.203 ORION SALVAGE-X (SAX) R8.204 ORION SLAVER-X (SLX) R8.205 ORION LIGHT RAIDER-X (LX) R8.206A ORION FREE-X-TRAITOR (FTX) R8.R201 ORION PLASMA RACK ALTERNATIVE ORION X-SHIP ENERGY FORM MODULE X1R R8.206B ORION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY BATTLER RAIDER (BRX) R8.207 ORION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FAST PATROL SHIP TENDER (PFX) R8.208 ORION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY WAR DESTROYER (DWX) R8.209 ORION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY HEAVY WAR DESTROYER (HDWX) THE SECRET HISTORY OF X-SHIPS MODULE Y1 YR8.0 ORION FREEHOLD YR8.2 ORION EARLY GUARD CRUISER (WCA) YR8.3 ORION EARLY GUARD DESTROYER (WDD) YR8.3A ORION ADVANCED (RAIDER) DESTROYER (YDD) YR8.4 ORION EARLY CRUISER RAIDER (YCR) YR8.5 ORION EARLY LIGHT RAIDER (YLR) BOARDING PARTY TABLE MODULE Y2 YR8.6 ORION NATONAL GUARD LIGHT CRUISER (WCL) YR8.7 ORION NATONAL GUARD EARLY HEAVY CRUISER (YCA) YR8.8 ORION EARLY SLAVER (YSL) YR8.9 ORION EARLY VIKING COMMANDO SHIP (YVK) “KINGDOM’S EBB” PART 3- EARLY YEARS FICTION MODULE Y3 YR8.10 ORION NATIONAL GUARD DREADNOUGHT (WDN) YR8.10A ORION ADVANCED NATIONAL GUARD DREADNOUGHT (WNR) YR8.11 ORION NATIONAL GUARD FRIGATE (WFF) YR8.11A ORION ADVANCED NATIONAL GUARD FRIGATE (WFR) YR8.12 ORION NATIONAL GUARD COMMANDO CRUISER (WCG) YR8.13 ORION NATIONAL GUARD COMMANDO DESTROYER (WDG) YR8.13A ORION ADVANCED NATIONAL GUARD COMMANDO DESTROYER (WGR).
Recommended publications
  • FROM CRADLE to GRAVE? the Place of the Aircraft
    FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE? The Place of the Aircraft Carrier in Australia's post-war Defence Force Subthesis submitted for the degree of MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES at the University College The University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy 1996 by ALLAN DU TOIT ACADEMY LIBRARy UNSW AT ADFA 437104 HMAS Melbourne, 1973. Trackers are parked to port and Skyhawks to starboard Declaration by Candidate I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. Allan du Toit Canberra, October 1996 Ill Abstract This subthesis sets out to study the place of the aircraft carrier in Australia's post-war defence force. Few changes in naval warfare have been as all embracing as the role played by the aircraft carrier, which is, without doubt, the most impressive, and at the same time the most controversial, manifestation of sea power. From 1948 until 1983 the aircraft carrier formed a significant component of the Australian Defence Force and the place of an aircraft carrier in defence strategy and the force structure seemed relatively secure. Although cost, especially in comparison to, and in competition with, other major defence projects, was probably the major issue in the demise of the aircraft carrier and an organic fixed-wing naval air capability in the Australian Defence Force, cost alone can obscure the ftindamental reordering of Australia's defence posture and strategic thinking, which significantly contributed to the decision not to replace HMAS Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battlefleet Gothic Additional Ships Compendium the Battlefleet
    THE BATTLEFLEET GOTHIC ADDITIONAL SHIPS COMPENDIUM - 1 The Battlefleet Gothic Additional Ships Compendium Additional rules published in White Dwarf, BFG Magazine and other Black Library books. Compiled by Thibault JABOULEY Imperial Ramilies Class Star Fort 875 pts.............................................................................3 Imperial Apocalypse Class Battleship 375 pts ......................................................................7 Imperial Invincible Class Fast Battleship 290 pts..................................................................8 Imperial Nemesis Class Fleet Carrier 400 pts.......................................................................9 Imperial Oberon Class Battleship 335 pts...........................................................................10 Imperial Vanquisher Class Battleship 340 pts.....................................................................11 Imperial Victory Class Battleship 360 pts............................................................................12 Imperial Avenger Class Grand Cruiser 220 pts...................................................................13 Imperial Exorcist Class Grand Cruiser 230 pts ...................................................................14 Imperial / Chaos Furious Class Grand Cruiser 265 pts......................................................15 Imperial / Chaos Vengeance Class Grand Cruiser 230 pts................................................17 Imperial Armaggedon Class Battlecruiser 235 pts ..............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Angled-Deck Aircraft Carrier—Innovation And
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 5 Number 2 Spring 2011 The evelopmeD nt of the Angled-Deck Aircraft Carrier—Innovation and Adaptation Thomas C. Hone Norman Friedman Mark D. Mandeles Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Hone, Thomas C.; Friedman, Norman; and Mandeles, Mark D. (2011) "The eD velopment of the Angled-Deck Aircraft Carrier—Innovation and Adaptation," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Hone et al.: The Development of the Angled-Deck Aircraft Carrier—Innovation an THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANGLED-DECK AIRCRAFT CARRIER Innovation and Adaptation Thomas C. Hone, Norman Friedman, and Mark D. Mandeles n late 2006, Andrew Marshall, the Director of the Office of Net Assessment in Ithe Office of the Secretary of Defense, asked us to answer several questions: Why had the Royal Navy (RN) developed the angled flight deck, steam catapult, and optical landing aid before the U.S. Navy (USN) did? Why had the USN not devel- oped these innovations, which “transformed carrier Dr. Hone is a professor at the Center for Naval Warfare design and made practical the wholesale use of Studies in the Naval War College, liaison with the Of- fice of the Chief of Naval Operations, and a former se- high-performance jet aircraft,” in parallel with the 1 nior executive in the Office of the Secretary of Defense RN? Once developed by the RN, how had these three and special assistant to the Commander, Naval Air Sys- tems Command.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters August 1998 NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers GAO/NSIAD-98-1 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-259298 August 27, 1998 The Honorable Ted Stevens Chairman The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable C.W. Bill Young Chairman The Honorable John P. Murtha Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on National Security Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives The aircraft carrier forms the building block of the Navy’s forward deployed peacetime presence, crisis response, and war-fighting forces. The nuclear-powered carrier is the most expensive weapon system in the Nation’s arsenal and represents a significant portion of the Navy’s shipbuilding and conversion future years defense program. As requested, this report discusses the cost-effectiveness to the Navy of using conventionally and nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. As the Defense Department and the Navy assess design concepts for a new class of carriers, they will evaluate a number of factors, including different propulsion types. This report contains information and analysis that you may find useful in the process of allocating future defense resources. We are sending copies of this report to the Secretaries of Defense, Navy, Energy, and State and the Director, Office of Management and Budget. Copies will also be made available to others on request. Please contact me on (202) 512-3504 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Sloop of War Pdf Free Download
    SLOOP OF WAR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Alexander Kent | 320 pages | 23 Jan 2006 | Cornerstone | 9780099493860 | English | London, United Kingdom Sloop of War PDF Book In later years the type evolved; in World War II sloops were specialized convoy-defence vessels, with anti-aircraft and anti-submarine capability. However, this tour provided no luck in finding slave ships. Given his first ship, Bolitho struggles with the decisions and responsibilities he holds as commander and comes to realise how lonely a place command really is. A pseudonym used by Douglas Reeman. Love words? Still, overall, an excellent experience and well worth the stop. See Article History. Shop Now. As the rating system covered all vessels with 20 guns and above, this meant that the term sloop-of-war actually encompassed all the unrated combat vessels including the very small gun- brigs and cutters. USS Constellation. In company with other men of war she has always remarked to go heavy, but very weatherly under any sail. I simply devoured this book. Each turn of the page captured my imagination and compelled me to read another chapter. Welcome back. Apr 30, theduckthief rated it really liked it. No trivia or quizzes yet. We're intent on clearing it up 'Nip it in the butt' or 'Nip it in the bud'? The carronades also used much less manpower than the long guns normally used to arm frigates. Return to Book Page. Books by Alexander Kent. However, it is by far not the fastest ship when running Before The Wind , again especially in stronger winds. Douglas Reeman.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Warfare in a Mature Precision-Strike Regime
    MARITIME WARFARE IN A MATURE PRECISION-STRIKE REGIME ANDREW F. KREPINEVICH 2014 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, non- partisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. © 2014 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Andrew Krepinevich is President of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. He assumed this position in 1993, following a 21-year career in the U.S. Army. Dr. Krepinevich has served in the Department of Defense’s Office of Net Assessment, and on the personal staff of three secretaries of defense. He has also served as a member of the National Defense Panel, the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Experimentation, the Joint Forces Command Advisory Board, and the Defense Policy Board. He currently serves on the Chief of Naval Operations' (CNO's) Advisory Board and on the Army Special Operations Command's Advisory Board. Dr. Krepinevich frequently contributes to print and broadcast media. He has lectured before a wide range of professional and academic audiences, and has served as a consultant on mil- itary affairs for many senior government officials, including several secretaries of defense, the CIA’s National Intelligence Council, and all four military services.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’S Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970
    Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970 Introduction In April 1962, the Canadian Government approved the acquisition of an aircraft carrier to replace Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) Magnificent (CVL 21), which had been on loan and was to be returned to the Royal Navy (RN). At the same time, a decision was taken to purchase and modernize an unfinished Second World War era aircraft carrier. The Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) set up a negotiating team to deal with the British Government and the Royal Navy. The RN argued that the contract to purchase the new carrier required that HMCS Magnificent be brought up to the latest “alterations and additions” (A&As) for her class before her return to the RN. These alterations were to include, among other modifications, an angled and strengthened deck. The RCN’s case was that these were modernizations and not A&As. Furthermore, the carrier being offered for purchase was being bought “as is”, therefore the RN must accept the return of HMCS Magnificent in an “as is” state. The Royal Navy was won over to the Canadian’s point of view and the negotiations were soon completed. A new project office for the Principal Royal Canadian Navy Technical Representative was established at Belfast, Northern Ireland, where the partially completed Majestic class, Light Fleet aircraft carrier, the ex-Her Majesty’s Ship (HMS) Powerful (R 95) was laying. Specifications With a length overall of 215 meters (705 ft) and a beam at the water line of 24 meters (79 ft), HMS Powerful was only slightly larger than HMCS Magnificent.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Navy Action and Operational Reports from World War II, Pacific Theater
    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of U.S. Navy Action and Operational Reports from World War II, Pacific Theater Part 2. Third Fleet and Third Fleet Carrier Task Forces UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of World War II Research Collections U.S. Navy Action and Operational Reports from World War II Pacific Theater Part 2. Third Fleet and Third Fleet Carrier Task Forces Project Editor and Guide compiled by Robert E. Lester A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data U.S. Navy action and operational reports from World War II. Pacific Theater. (World War II research collections) Accompanied by printed reel guides compiled by Robert E. Lester. Includes indexes. Contents: pt. 1. CINCPAC (Commander-in-Chief Pacific Area Command) (16 reels) -- pt. 2. Third Fleet and Third Fleet Carrier Task Forces (16 reels) -- pt. 3. Fifth Fleet and Fifth Fleet Carrier Task Forces (12 reels). 1. United States-Navy-History-World War, 1939-1945-- Sources. 2. World War, 1939-1945--Naval operations, American-Sources. 3. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-- Pacific Ocean-Sources. 4. United States~Navy~Fleet, 3rd~History-Sources. 5. United States-Navy-Fleet, 5th~History--Sources. I. Lester, Robert. [Microfilm] 90/7009 (E) 940.54'5973 90-956103 ISBN 1-55655-191-6 (Microfilm :pt. 2) CIP Copyright 1990 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-191-6. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction v Scope and Content Note v¡¡ Source and Editorial Note ¡x Author List xi Acronyms and Initialisms List x¡¡¡ Reel Index Reell Third Fleet 1 Reel 2 Third Fleet Carrier Task Forces TF38 5 TG 38.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Fleet-Versus-Fleet Operations in the Pacific War, 1941–1945 Operations in the Pacific War, 1941–1945 Second Edition Milan Vego Milan Vego Second Ed
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons Historical Monographs Special Collections 2016 HM 22: Major Fleet-versus-Fleet Operations in the Pacific arW , 1941–1945 Milan Vego Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/usnwc-historical-monographs Recommended Citation Vego, Milan, "HM 22: Major Fleet-versus-Fleet Operations in the Pacific arW , 1941–1945" (2016). Historical Monographs. 22. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/usnwc-historical-monographs/22 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Monographs by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS Major Fleet-versus-Fleet Major Fleet-versus-Fleet Operations in the Pacific War, 1941–1945 War, Pacific the in Operations Fleet-versus-Fleet Major Operations in the Pacific War, 1941–1945 Second Edition Milan Vego Milan Vego Milan Second Ed. Second Also by Milan Vego COVER Units of the 1st Marine Division in LVT Assault Craft Pass the Battleship USS North Carolina off Okinawa, 1 April 1945, by the prolific maritime artist John Hamilton (1919–93). Used courtesy of the Navy Art Collection, Washington, D.C.; the painting is currently on loan to the Naval War College Museum. In the inset image and title page, Vice Admiral Raymond A. Spruance ashore on Kwajalein in February 1944, immediately after the seizure of the island, with Admiral Chester W.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy Fleet Problems and the Development of Carrier
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository UNITED STATES NAVY FLEET PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AVIATION, 1929-1933 A Thesis by RYAN DAVID WADLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2005 Major Subject: History UNITED STATES NAVY FLEET PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AVIATION, 1929-1933 A Thesis by RYAN DAVID WADLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James Bradford Committee Members, R.J.Q. Adams James Olson Head of Department, Walter Buenger August 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT United States Navy Fleet Problems and the Development of Carrier Aviation, 1929-1933. (August 2005) Ryan David Wadle, B. A., Iowa State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Bradford The U.S. Navy first took official notice of aviation in 1910, but its development of carrier aviation lagged behind Great Britain’s until the 1920s. The first American aircraft carrier, the Langley, commissioned in 1919, provided the Navy with a valuable platform to explore the potential uses of carrier aviation, but was usually limited to scouting and fleet air defense in the U.S. Navy’s annual interwar exercises called fleet problems. This began to change in 1929 with the introduction of the carriers Lexington and Saratoga in Fleet Problem IX.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Hermes 2018
    HMS HERMES DIVE INTO HISTORY! The HMS Hermes is one of only 4 diveable Aircraft Carriers around the world. (others are USS Saratoga - Bikini Atoll, USS Pensacola - artificial reef in the US and the Graf Zepplin - Hitlers only carrier (which didn't see any war time). It also happens to be the Only aircraft Carrier that was sunk during battle. The HMS Hermes is not only a fantastic wreck to dive, but also historically significant. Built for the Royal Navy, she was the world's first ship to be designed and built as an aircraft carrier. We look forward to showing you this great wreck. TRIP details: Incl: • 10 days all inclusive package • 6 days diving, 12 dive pack, • All accom 9 nights accom (based on twin share), • airport transfers, excl: “The Worlds first • O2 - $0.06/litre, Commissioned • Helium - $0.15/litre Aircraft Carrier” • Sorb $15/kg • CCR cylinder rental - $20/day per set [!1] HISTORY 1942 WWI battle ships to counter this assumed that the British fleet must be The war wasn't going too well for threat. on the East Coast at Trincomalee, and the Allied forces in 1942. Singapore, Under no illusion, Sommerville ordered an attack. Warned of the The Dutch East Indies and the knew that The British carrier aircraft impeding attack by a patrolling Philippines had all fallen. Every major were no match for the Japanese Catalina, the last two major warships, Allied warship in the South China Sea Zero’s, Kate’s and Val’s. He was at HMS Hermes, a light Fleet Carrier and Java Sea had been sunk or chased risk of becoming the first British and HMAS Vampire her destroyer away.
    [Show full text]
  • The Combat Utility of the U.S. Fleet Aircraft Carrier in the Post-War Period1
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 16, ISSUE 4 (2016) Studies The combat utility of the U.S. fleet aircraft carrier in the post-war period1 Ben Ho Wan Beng2 Introduction The fleet aircraft carrier possesses a number of attributes that make it the United States National Command Authorities’ platform of choice to deal with a crisis or war. These attributes are namely, territorial independence, mobility that allows it to deploy as a “first-responder” to a troubled spot, and flexibility provided by the vessel’s air wing that allows it to handle different and evolving scenarios. Nevertheless, it must be noted that the relatively successful and unencumbered application of American sea-based airpower in the post-war period has been significantly aided by the benign environments in which the carriers have operated. To illustrate, during Operations Desert Storm and Enduring Freedom, U.S. carriers came up against adversaries with few or no anti- access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities such as submarines and missiles. In other words, 1 This paper is adapted from the author’s master’s degree in strategic studies dissertation on a similar topic at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore. 2 Senior Analyst, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2016 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES American carriers have so far only proven their worth in situations located on the lower end of the combat spectrum. Indeed, they last met an opponent of a substantial standing – the Japanese navy – in 1944, and questions abound over their ability to do so credibly should the opportunity presents itself in the future.
    [Show full text]