DOCSLIB.ORG

Vision Plan 2017 OUR APPROACH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Made possible by the generosity of NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2017 OUR APPROACH RK CAG 4Rs Riverkeeper-led Born out of Superfund Framed by 4Rs initiative, with Community Advisory > Remediation Newtown Creek Group Vision > Restoration Alliance Principles > Recreation > Resiliency CAG VISION PRINCIPLES 1. Remove All Contaminated Sediment 2. Address CSOs and Stormwater Drainage 3. Make Safe for Fish Consumption 4. Improve Water Quality to Swimmable Levels 5. Protect and Promote Marine Ecosystem 6. Shoreline Restoration in Tributaries 7. Allow for Navigation Channels 8. Preserve Industrial Core 9. Continued Mixed Use of Waterway 10. Robust Community Participation 11. Increased Public Access for Education + Recreation 12. Climate Change OUR PARTNERS P+W The Community New York City Riverkeeper NCA CAG THE TIMELINE May 2017 Aug 2017 Dec 2017 Design Final Testing Report Community Input Community Input VISIONING PROCESS PLANNING LENS 4 Rs Parks and Public Space Remediation Streets and Transportation Restoration NEWTOWN CREEK Recreational Boating Recreation Vision Plan 2017 Ecology and Ecosystems Resiliency Shorelines Stormwater and CSOs Water Quality Industry & Working Waterfront Policy & Governance COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Parks and Public Space • More public open space and better signage • Utilize space under and adjacent to bridges • Provide waterfront access behind buildings, at publicly owned waterfront sites and longitudinally along the Creek Surrounding Street Redesign • Improved bike lanes and bike parking at water access points and street-ends • Extend public access to the water • Redesign street-ends into open spaces Recreational Boating • More recreational boating facilities and access to water • Jointly develop protocols for commercial and recreational traffic COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Ecology and Ecosystems • Increase biodiversity by increasing and enhancing ecosystem diversity • Require green infrastructure at any and all construction or redevelopment sites in Newtown Creek watershed sufficient to capture full site stormwater runoff • Provide for oysters and mussels throughout the Creek Shorelines • Bike/Ped easement along the Creek • Shoreline as educational tool • Increased living shoreline strategies • Water taxi and ferry access Industry • Water-dependent business should have priority along the waterfront • Strengthen and evolve working class jobs, in conjunction with sustainability and a remediated/restored Creek COMMUNITY FEEDBACK CSO, Stormwater and Water Quality • Volume reduction through green infrastructure and low impact design • Deploy flood control and management measures where appropriate • Achieve swimmable water conditions - year round • Capture and reduce stormwater volume, reduce number of CSO discharge events, and control nonpoint and separate stormwater pollution sources • Utilize green infrastructure and passive rainwater capture and infiltration wherever possible, including and especially on private property Policy • More partnerships and public events to raise awareness • More outreach to schools and academic partners • Break down regulatory and agency silos • Increased pollution monitoring and enforcement IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Creekwide • Comprehensive planning and incentives to address sea level rise • Develop mechanisms for legally engaging property owners in improving resiliency, restoration and/or public access along unused shorelines • Develop approaches for remediating failing bulkheads, and better ecological guidelines for rebuilding bulkheads • Open industrial uses, better ways to store and move materials • Urban Heat Island Effect, explore ways to reduce (more greenery) • Green Infrastructure for industrial and residential areas (MS4 + CSO) • Create soft edges where feasible • No Wake Zone • Improved pedestrian/bike access between access points • Improve education and public art opportunities • Develop full-cycle waste and energy stream plan IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Mouth of Creek Storm Surge Barrier - what are the impacts, concerns, desired effects? • Marina / legal docks at sailboat area • Enforced No Wake Zone • Park under Queens side of Pulaski • Vernon Blvd Street End redesign, with greenspace and boat launch • Public use of open space under Pulaski with connection to North Brooklyn Community Boathouse • GMDC bulkhead redesign • Stormwater capture and GI opportunities: Vernon Blvd, 54th Ave and capture from Pulaski bridge. IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Whale Creek Reach Marine Transfer Station and DSNY property, possible future uses? Better materials storage and docking operations for Sims and Allocco? • Park or public space on DEP property at Greenpoint Ave and Kingsland Ave • Expand Kingsland Wildflowers greenroof • Shoreline and marsh improvements at North Henry Street/ No Name inlet, with connection to Nature Walk • Pedestrian and cycling connectors/access (Kingsland Ave to McGolrick Park), including redesign of Kingsland Ave near Nature Walk • Possible marina on Queen’s shoreline (MTA property) • Restoration opportunity at ConEd lot near Pulaski Bridge IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Dutch Kills Should Dutch Kills be de-listed as a navigable waterbody for increased marsh restoration and bridge re-designs? Montauk Rail, should it be reactivated as a passenger line? • Expand Montauk Cutoff walkway to connect to Borden Ave (via walkway over water or surrounding property) or to Greenpoint Ave (potential for elevated berm) • FedEx shoreline, potential for controlled public access and path (Bernie’s walk) • 29th Street/park (with or without street closure) • Borden Ave Bridge house - potential for new uses • Sunnyside Commons (large park space near the head of DK) • Value for education and boating access with nearby schools and residential communities • Removal of abandoned barges at head of Dutch Kills • Replace Borden Ave bridge, increase flow • Storm barrier at mouth; feasible, useful? IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Mile 2 What are priorities for street-end redesign (Apollo, Meeker, Under K-Bridge)? • Blissville Seep (Queens) and Meeker Ave Plumes (BK) need more attention and remediation plans in place • Potential bike path on Queens side, maybe along the Calvary cemetery sidewalk • Water/Boat launch access under K-Bridge (BK) • Shoreline restoration under K-Bridge (Queens) - a way to create public access? • Shoreline restoration opportunities: Green Asphalt, and Maspeth Concrete • Montauk passenger rail line, possible stop in this area? • Exxon remediation site, future plans beyond remediation? • Living Bulkheads to Increase habitat function (Exxon, Waste Management, Empire Merchants) IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Turning Basin National Grid site, what are community ideas near and long term? • Potential walkway behind Restaurant Depot and Phelps Dodge site • Redesign of Plank Road area and shoreline restoration running to Maspeth Creek • Maspeth Ave (BK) with potential for street end improvement • Full remediation of National Grid site. Possible redesign of bulkhead (Superfund dependent) • Round the National Grid corner to improve movement of water • Recreate Mussel Island IMPROVEMENT IDEAS Maspeth Creek Strong desire for salt marsh; ways to incorporate public access? • Path along north shore, possible pedestrian bridge over Maspeth Creek • Potential access on 49th street • CSO storage tunnel or tank to fix CSO • Osprey platforms, shore bird habitat, cormorant hang out spot (if boom is removed long term) • Soften corner at the mouth (southside) • Examining ways to protect north shore sites for flooding/sea level rise IMPROVEMENT IDEAS East Branch Re-imagine aeration site and long term goals, needs? De-list as navigable waterway (for marsh restoration and improved bridge design)? • Wetland restoration past bridge (on both sides) • Bridge is likely to be replaced, what is ideal design long term? • Shoreline restoration along trucking depot (YRC Freight) • Possible access near Western Beef inlet IMPROVEMENT IDEAS English Kills Better way to improve circulation? Rounding the corners? Public Access – where do we want it and how do we get it? • Possible access/path from Johnson Ave to Morgan Ave. Could utilize MTA parking lot and MTA rail bridge • Metropolitan Ave get down to the Creek (NW corner) • Commercial public access. Ways to increase/improve private shoreline access, including venues, restaurants, etc • CSO storage tank or tunnel is necessary to fix NCB-015 • Aeration: a better long term approach. System that doesn't disrupt surface waters/air and that is utilized as needed. • Salt marsh in Waste Management inlet • Salt marsh in head of tributary; de-list navigability here? • Examine groundwater flow and historic streams, ways to improve freshwater input • Special incentive for GI for new commercial projects nearby So, what’s your vision for Newtown MANHATTAN Creek? WILLIAMSBURG BROOKLYN HUNTERS POINT GREENPOINT EAST WILLIAMSBURG LIE QUEENS let usSUNNYSIDE know [email protected] or continue the conversation MASPETH www.riverkeeper.org/newtowncreek BQE.
Recommended publications
  • Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center

    Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center

    Greenpoint Energy Center Site This Upland Site Summary was authored by National Grid. The opinions, statements, and conclusions herein are solely those of National Grid. They are not adopted by and should not be attributed to any other Person. SITE NAME: NATIONAL GRID: GREENPOINT ENERGY CENTER Address: 287 Maspeth Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11211 Tax Lot Parcel(s): Brooklyn, Block 2837, Lot 1 Latitude: 40.720500 - 40° 43’ 5.30’’ Longitude: 73.931800 - 73° 55’ 51.24’’ Regulatory Programs/Numbers/Codes: NYSDEC Codes 224052, V00631, 610000X6OG - Division of Air Resources ID, (NYSDEC)00157 - Compliance Data System ID, (USEPA)NYD986871077 - Facility Index Database System ID, (USEPA)NYD006978795 - Resource Conservation Recovery Act ID , (USEPA) Plant ID 110002337784, Spill No. 9009058, 9111530, 9211562, 9301329, 9305107, 9606233, 9714234, 0004653, 0104143, 0106270, 0202908, 0303442, 0310061, 0413650, 0506134, 0908424, 0908872, 1006581, and 1012824. Analytical Data Status: Electronic Data Available Hardcopies Only No Data Available 1 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN (COPCs) TRANSPORT PATHWAYS TO THE CREEK The current understanding of the transport mechanisms of contaminants from the upland portions of the Greenpoint Energy Center (Site) to Newtown Creek is summarized in this section and Table 1. Overland Transport: No specific evidence of overland transport was identified in the available site records. The pathway has not been evaluated for completeness but will be under investigation in the near future. Bank Erosion: A relieving platform (bulkhead) adjacent to Newtown Creek extends along the eastern part of the Site. No specific evidence of bank erosion was identified in the available Draft Upland Site Summary May 2012 Newtown Creek RI/FS 1 110782-01.01 Greenpoint Energy Center Site site records.
  • Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017

    Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017

    Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017 Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017 In 2017 the Newtown Creek Alliance, Table of Contents in partnership with LaGuardia Community College and the North Introduction 4 Brooklyn Boat Club, ran an extensive Combined Sewer Overflow 5 water quality program, collecting over Sampling Locations 7 2,000 points of data from seven Rainfall 9 different locations on Newtown Creek. Dissolved Oxygen 11 This report provides details on the Enterococcus 15 parameters that we tested for, trends Phosphorus 17 that were observed as well as specific Algal Blooms 18 issues we targeted through our Marine Debris 21 research. Bird Survey 22 Next Steps 23 Additional Resources 24 Funding for this report was provided by the Hudson River Foundation. 1 In 2017 the Newtown Creek Alliance, Table of Contents in partnership with LaGuardia Community College and the North Introduction 4 Brooklyn Boat Club, ran an extensive Combined Sewer Overflow 5 water quality program, collecting over Sampling Locations 7 2,000 points of data from seven Rainfall 9 different locations on Newtown Creek. Dissolved Oxygen 11 This report provides details on the Enterococcus 15 parameters that we tested for, trends Phosphorus 17 that were observed as well as specific Algal Blooms 18 issues we targeted through our Marine Debris 21 research. Bird Survey 22 Next Steps 23 Additional Resources 24 Funding for this report was provided by the Hudson River Foundation. 2 3 Introduction Newtown Creek is a 3.8 miles waterway forming the western border between the boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens in New York City.
  • Naturally Hypernatural

    Naturally Hypernatural

    ANTENNAE ISSUE 34 – WINTER 2015 ISSN 1756-9575 Naturally Hypernatural Suzanne Anker – Petri[e]’s Panopolis / Laura Ballantyne-Brodie – Earth System Ethics / Janet Gibbs – A Step on the Sun / Henry Sanchez – The English Kills Project / Steve Miller and Adam Stennett – Artist Survival Shack / Joe Mangrum – Sand Paintings / Tarah Rhoda and Nancy Chunn – Chicken Little and the Culture of Fear / Sarah E Durand – Newtown Creek ANTENNAE The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture Editor in Chief Giovanni Aloi – School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Sotheby’s Institute of Art London and New York, Tate Galleries Academic Board Advisory Board Steve Baker – University of Central Lancashire Rod Bennison Ron Broglio – Arizona State University Helen J. Bullard Matthew Brower – University of Toronto Claude d’Anthenaise Eric Brown – University of Maine at Farmington Lisa Brown Carol Gigliotti – Emily Carr University of Art and Design in Vancouver Chris Hunter Donna Haraway – University of California, Santa Cruz Karen Knorr Susan McHugh – University of New England Susan Nance Brett Mizelle – California State University Andrea Roe Claire Molloy – Edge Hill University David Rothenberg Cecilia Novero – University of Otago Angela Singer Jennifer Parker-Starbuck – Roehampton University Mark Wilson & Bryndís Snaebjornsdottir Annie Potts – University of Canterbury Ken Rinaldo – Ohio State University Nigel Rothfels – University of Wisconsin Jessica Ullrich – Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Andrew Yang – School of the Art Institute of Chicago Global Contributors Antennae (founded in 2006) is the international, peer reviewed, academic Sonja Britz journal on the subject of nature in contemporary art. Its format and Tim Chamberlain contents are inspired by the concepts of 'knowledge transfer' and 'widening Conception Cortes participation'.
  • Newtown Creek Guide

    Newtown Creek Guide

    total. There are 4 sections of Calvary (365 acres in total), the one on the Newtown Creek Superfund cleanup and coal tar (a product Newtown Creek closest Newtown Creek is known as First or Old Calvary. It is a Roman from MGP) can be seen bubbling up from the Creek’s floor nearby is a 3.8 mile waterway connected to the East River and serves as the border between Western Queens and North Brooklyn. By the early 20th century the Creek became Catholic Cemetery, managed by St. Patrick’s Cathedral. at low tide. one of the busiest waterways in the country, carrying more value and volume of cargo than the entire Mississippi River. Goods manufactured in the area included fer- 1 tilizers, chemicals, glues, ropes, dyes and many varieties of petroleum products. The lax environmental regulation and protections in place during the heyday of heavy industrial use (1860-1970) left a legacy of toxic contamination, still present within the sediments of the Creek. As a result, the Creek was declared a federal Superfund Greenpoint Oil Spill Maspeth Avenue Plank Road Bridge The largest underground oil spill in the history of the United States One of the oldest crossing of Newtown Creek this bridge connected N 2 bridge site in 2010; investigation and remediation is currently underway, overseen by the US EPA. Environmental conditions continue to improve on Newtown Creek with many 16 23 is located beneath a 55 acre area of Greenpoint. The plume, an esti- the early communities of Maspeth and Newtown, across what was north native species of fish and birds returning to the area.
  • NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    6 NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Executive Summary Throughout the visioning In early 2015, the Newtown Creek 46). They range from the conspicuous Superfund Community Advisory Group (removal of contamination, stopping process, there were (CAG), met at LaGuardia Community ongoing pollution sources, and preventing College to develop a set of guiding future contamination) to the less overt few messages that principles and thereby establishing a (promotion and protection of industrial resounded with the framework for determining the future of uses, restoration of indigenous wildlife the Creek and its surroundings as the in the water and onshore, resilience in community as clearly EPA’s process for remediation moved light of climate change and its impacts on forward. The members of the CAG knew Creek communities, and public access as the need for better that if any long term plan for the cleanup and participation in the waterway). connections between the of the waterway were to be a success, They are a dynamic and proactive set the bar had to be set high in order to see of guidelines, designed to usher in a communities and the appropriate attention and investments. Newtown Creek for the 21st century; waterways. They knew that if the community robust, resilient, and as teaming with life surrounding the Creek was to benefit from as the City that surrounds it. the coming remediation they had to be With City plans for sewage and involved as proactive participants in the stormwater pollution investments taking planning of its
  • MASPETH MARSH: Introduction Riverkeeper and the Newtown and Difficult to Navigate at Low Creek Alliance Are Dedicated to Tide

    MASPETH MARSH: Introduction Riverkeeper and the Newtown and Difficult to Navigate at Low Creek Alliance Are Dedicated to Tide

    MASPETH MARSH: Introduction Riverkeeper and the Newtown and difficult to navigate at low Creek Alliance are dedicated to tide. With large-scale industrial achieving a remediated, restored, operations encircling the tributary, resilient, and recreation-friendly mostly consisting of parking lots Newtown Creek. These goals abutting the waterway, and a trash encompass the entire Newtown boom stretching across the mouth Creek system, including the of Maspeth Creek, the waterway waterbody’s surrounding industrial has been kept a world apart from community and nearby residents. In human use, both recreational 2017, we began a process to better and industrial. Although coated understand the state of the Creek, in contamination and saturated the collective vision for its future with sewage, the inaccessibility of and the interventions necessary to Maspeth Creek and the shoreline get there. The 85 ideas generated provide some sanctuary for in the resulting visioning report wildlife. Numerous bird species like are flexible, intended to be shaped cormorants, herons and egrets are by Newtown Creek stakeholders, often observed foraging and fishing including the Superfund Community around the trash boom and in the Advisory Group. open waters of the adjacent Turning Basin. A key element of the Newtown Creek Vision Plan is a restored The current shallow water Maspeth Creek wetland. Before it conditions of Maspeth Creek was industrialized, hardened and leave much of the Creek bottom re-shaped during the 20th century, exposed during the lowest tides of a rich wetland habitat once existed the year. This is one of the most in the historic footprint of the practical areas to de-list the formal Creek.
  • Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis

    Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis

    Kosciuszko Bridge Project Newtown Creek Navigation Analysis September 22, 2005 New York State Department of Transportation Chapter I Introduction A. OVERVIEW Newtown Creek is a tributary of the East River in the New York Harbor and the Port of New York/New Jersey. It is considered a narrow tidal arm of the East River and forms a portion of the boundary between the Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens. The mouth of the creek is located on the east bank of the East River about 3.6 miles above The Battery. The creek extends 3.3 miles eastward and southward and has several short tributaries and basins. Newtown Creek lies in a highly industrialized area of New York City. Almost the entire water frontage is developed for terminal and industrial purposes. Traffic is moderate and consists of petroleum products, sand, gravel and stone, scrap metal, and waste management material. Vessel drafts today seldom exceed 15 feet. The mean range of tide in the creek is 4.1 feet with generally weak and variable tidal currents. B. TRIBUTARIES The tributary basins formally identified by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Ocean Service (NOS) are as follows: x Dutch Kills – on the north side of Newtown Creek, 0.8 miles from the East River; x Whale Creek – on the south side, at Mile 0.85, approximately opposite Dutch Kills; x Unnamed Canal – on the south side, at Mile 0.95, adjacent to a New York City Department of Sanitation (DSNY) facility; x Maspeth Creek – on the east side, at Mile 2.2; x East Branch – on the east side, at Mile 2.5; and x English Kills – extends eastward and southward from the East Branch entrance and forms the last 0.8 miles of Newtown Creek.
  • Prepared By: R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. 241 East Fourth

    Prepared By: R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. 241 East Fourth

    FINAL CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY STAGE 1A REPORT NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY, NEWTOWN CREEK Prepared by: R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. 241 East Fourth Street, Suite 100 Frederick, MD 21701 December 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Cultural Resources Survey Stage 1A Report describes the results of research to identify any known or potential cultural resources within the Study Area in compliance with Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). This research included reconnaissance surveys, background research, and development of historical contexts (e.g., land use patterns and prehistoric and historic cultural development) (Anchor QEA 2011: 11). This report was prepared for Anchor QEA, LLC, and performed in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in the USEPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) program (USEPA 1989). The Newtown Creek Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) is being conducted under the USEPA CERCLA program and, therefore, must meet the requirements of the applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). The USEPA guidance document CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual, Part II Clean Air Act, and Other Environmental Statutes and State Requirements (USEPA 1989) describes how the effects of a CERCLA remedial action must consider impacts on cultural resources. This guidance document describes a process for compliance with the NHPA and defines the responsibilities of USEPA and other involved agencies (i.e., the State Historic Preservation Office [SHPO] and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation [ACHP]) (Anchor QEA 2011). Remedial actions performed under CERCLA are subject to the regulations set forth in the NHPA of 1966, as amended (regulations at 36 CFR Part 800 – Protection of Historic Properties).
  • Sailing Directions Pictograph Legend

    Sailing Directions Pictograph Legend

    Fisheries and Oceans Pêches et Océans Canada Canada Corrected to Monthly Edition No. 06/2020 ARC 400 FIRST EDITION General Information Northern Canada Sailing Directions Pictograph legend Anchorage ARC ARC 403 402 Wharf Marina ARC 404 Current ARC 401 Caution Light Radio calling-in point Lifesaving station Pilotage Government of Canada Information line 1-613-993-0999 Canadian Coast Guard Search and Rescue Joint Rescue Coordination Centre Trenton (Great Lakes and Arctic) 1-800-267-7270 Cover photograph Ellesmere Island, near Fort Conger Photo by: David Adler, [email protected] B O O K L E T A R C 4 0 0 Corrected to Monthly Edition No. 06/2020 Sailing Directions General Information Northern Canada First Edition 2009 Fisheries and Oceans Canada Users of this publication are requested to forward information regarding newly discovered dangers, changes in aids to navigation, the existence of new shoals or channels, printing errors, or other information that would be useful for the correction of nautical charts and hydrographic publications affecting Canadian waters to: Director General Canadian Hydrographic Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E6 The Canadian Hydrographic Service produces and distributes Nautical Charts, Sailing Directions, Small Craft Guides, Canadian Tide and Current Tables and the Atlas of Tidal Currents of the navigable waters of Canada. These publications are available from authorized Canadian Hydrographic Service Chart Dealers. For information about these publications, please contact: Canadian Hydrographic Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada 200 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E6 Phone: 613-998-4931 Toll Free: 1-866-546-3613 Fax: 613-998-1217 E-mail: [email protected] or visit the CHS web site for dealer location and related information at: www.charts.gc.ca © Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2009 Catalogue No.