NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Executive Summary Throughout the visioning In early 2015, the Newtown Creek 46). They range from the conspicuous Superfund Community Advisory Group (removal of contamination, stopping process, there were (CAG), met at LaGuardia Community ongoing pollution sources, and preventing College to develop a set of guiding future contamination) to the less overt few messages that principles and thereby establishing a (promotion and protection of industrial resounded with the framework for determining the future of uses, restoration of indigenous wildlife the Creek and its surroundings as the in the water and onshore, resilience in community as clearly EPA’s process for remediation moved light of climate change and its impacts on forward. The members of the CAG knew Creek communities, and public access as the need for better that if any long term plan for the cleanup and participation in the waterway). connections between the of the waterway were to be a success, They are a dynamic and proactive set the bar had to be set high in order to see of guidelines, designed to usher in a communities and the appropriate attention and investments. Newtown Creek for the 21st century; waterways. They knew that if the community robust, resilient, and as teaming with life surrounding the Creek was to benefit from as the City that surrounds it. the coming remediation they had to be With City plans for sewage and involved as proactive participants in the stormwater pollution investments taking planning of its future restoration. shape through DEP’s Long Term Control From that initial meeting, 12 Guiding Plan (LTCP), legacy contamination clean- Principles were outlined (see page up through the EPA’s Superfund process Newtown Creek at Whale Creek 8 NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / The Vision underway, and redevelopment of all kinds exploding in communities surrounding the waterfront, Newtown Creek needs its own comprehensive long-term plan, one that pulls all of these elements together and sees the waterway in its future, cohesive state. The CAG’s principles were the first concrete steps in creating a roadmap for agencies at the helm of the Creek’s remediation. This Vision Plan takes those principles and builds off of them; visualizing a new way for the Creek to function in the coming century. To create such a roadmap, Riverkeeper and the Newtown Creek Alliance, alongside A working waterfront A natural waterfront Creek stakeholders in the Brooklyn and Queens communities, launched the vision community, have yet to launch – given infrastructure alike. process to capture decades of community the pollution and access barriers extant The industrial sector around Newtown conversations in one report. in this watershed. The Vision Plan is Creek inadvertently has removed many also a record of the pollution, access, With all of the pollution presently of these neighborhoods from their and investment barriers facing Newtown discharging into these waterways each waterway. Crucial to past and present Creek, and a plan for how to overcome year, and uncertainty around access and regional economies, these industrial those barriers, together. the way in which Superfund remediation sites are both the cause of many of the and restoration will take place, there THE CREEK Creek’s worst problems and hold the keys is, and always has been, a community Determining a path forward for the to many of the it’s most valuable clean of people fighting for this community Newtown Creek requires efforts and water innovations. However and often resource and a place to play, learn, fish, innovation through large tracts of both surprisingly, recreational activities abound and paddle. We hope that this report Queens and Brooklyn, it’s clear that throughout the Creek, despite toxic captured the concepts of the local change in the waterway is driven by contamination, sewage and stormwater community – residents, businesses, change in the watershed. The Creek pollution, and inaccessible waterfronts. visitors, and visionaries alike. both connects and divides a number Street-end access points, boat clubs, and environmental education hubs have We see Newtown Creek not as an of communities in Queens (Long arisen in several of the quiet corners unapproachable problem, or as forgotten Island City, Sunnyside, Maspeth, and and protected areas of the Creek. With a waterway; rather, we see waterways Ridgewood) and Brooklyn (Greenpoint, valuable and significant maritime uses, teeming with aquatic life, active East Williamsburg and Bushwick). These historically low levels of pollution, new recreational communities, clean water neighborhoods are home to hundreds commercial investments, and growing stewards, and committed educators. We of thousands of New Yorkers; a host of local neighborhoods, Newtown Creek see a waterway with great potential. cultures, economies, and interests. Many of these areas are experiencing rapid plays a unique and crucial role in the This Vision Plan is a community- commercial and exponential residential economic, social, and urban environment driven catalog of these efforts already expansion and growth, exerting extreme of Queens, Brooklyn - all at the underway, as well as some new ideas pressures on existing industry and (geographic) center of New York City. for investments and innovations we, the 9 STATE OF THE CREEK A singularly complex and dynamic urban ecosystem, Newtown Creek is deeply polluted and has suffered more than a century of degradation. The last two decades however, remarkable strides have been made to reverse this legacy. The ebbs and flows of use and abuse, attention, and care from the regulatory and management agencies, universities, industries, and local advocacy efforts, continue to shape the Creek systems we work and live with today and will define the bounds of what is possible for the future. These complex systems are not always easy to define, some elements of them are very clear; legacy pollution, Surface contamination in the Creek ongoing contamination, rebounding ecosystems, a transitioning industrial wetlands that do exist (or have been built) impermeable surfaces that lead from core, exploding adjacent commercial and in the Creek reveal the potential for the to the water's’ edge to several blocks residential development, a strong and waterway to realize the many co-benefits upland. Multiple truck routes, highways, growing group of community advocates of salt marsh restoration, such as water and significant bridges cross the Creek, and stewards. How these systems filtration by native mussels and oysters the Pulaski, recently modified for better intertwine to form a healthy future is what and storm surge protection due to energy bike and pedestrian use, the newly-rebuilt this planning document envisions. absorbing landscapes. Kosciuszko, the more than a century old Grand Street bridge and a host of Ecologically, the naturalized riprap, hard The Creek, home to water-dependent streets along and around the shoreline bulkheads and soft edges, floating docks industries – barges brining materials in are all highly trafficked industrial and and fledgling salt marsh wetlands, street and carrying the City’s wastes out – must commuter corridors. Pressing up against ends and sewer outfalls of the Creek are figure prominently in this Vision. These this industrial activity the region is being all a part of the larger estuary system that industries are the hidden life's blood to reshaped by dense new developments, is the New York Harbor. Tidally driven and the City; providing well paid entry level new infrastructure, and new zoning plans. inundated by runoff with every rainfall, blue collar jobs, critical infrastructure, these waterways have the potential to and economic stability to many of the Layered over these ecological, social, be part of a very productive regional surrounding communities. The waterway and economic considerations is the ecosystem. Today, however, much of the itself is designated as a Significant catastrophic stress caused by ongoing historic wetlands, marshes, seagrasses Maritime and Industrial Area (SMIA); sewage and stormwater pollution. The and soft edges have been transformed, industries along the Creek move over a vast majority of the land that drains hardened with bulkheads, functionally million tons of freight by barge every year. to this waterway – the ~6,500 acre removed from the rest of the ecosystem The Creek’s waterfront is nearly entirely Newtown Creek sewershed – is served – in short, the Creek has been turned industrial - the Mouth of the Creek being by a combined sewer system. In this from a natural wetland to a man made the only exception. antiquated waste water system (where waterfront, losing the benefits of habitat storm drains in the streets are connected Expansive pre war rooftops, enormous rich soft edges and water infiltrating soils. underground with the sewer pipes parking lots, miles of pavement, all The natural and constructed floating coming from homes and businesses), 10 NEWTOWN CREEK Vision Plan 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / The Vision precipitation events as common as appear hopelessly marred by humanities site, relief and environmental justice is in 1/10th of an inch can exceed the sewers’ activities. sight. capacity, overflow within the system, and Industry, particularly oil and other Newtown Creek was listed on the National discharge directly into the Creek. Up to refineries and metal processing facilities, Priorities list in 2010, triggering
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 148/Tuesday, August 1, 2000/Rules
    46870 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 1, 2000 / Rules and Regulations significant economic impact on a Civil Justice Reform Dated: July 19, 2000. substantial number of small entities. G.N. Naccara, ``Small entities'' comprises small This rule meets applicable standards Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, businesses, not-for-profit organizations in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive First Coast Guard District. that are independently owned and Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to [FR Doc. 00±19396 Filed 7±31±00; 8:45 am] operated and are not dominant in their minimize litigation, eliminate BILLING CODE 4910±15±P fields, and governmental jurisdictions ambiguity, and reduce burden. with populations less than 50,000. Protection of Children The Coast Guard certifies under 5 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have We have analyzed this rule under a significant economic impact on a Executive Order 13045, Protection of Coast Guard substantial number of small entities. Children from Environmental Health 33 CFR Part 117 This conclusion is based on the fact that Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not three of the bridges presently open after an economically significant rule and a six-hour notice May 1 through does not concern an environmental risk [CGD01±99±069] September 30, which is greater than the to health or risk to safety that may proposed two-hour notice during those disproportionately affect children. RIN 2115±AE47 five months. The Coast Guard believes that the Environment Drawbridge Operation Regulations: two-hour advance notice October 1 Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, English The Coast Guard considered the through April 30 is reasonable because Kills and their tributaries, New York the bridges will still open on signal environmental impact of this rule and provided the two-hour notice is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Newtown Creek Project Packet
    NEWTOWN CREEK PROJECT PACKET Name: ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTORY READING: Encyclopedia. “Newtown Creek.” The Encyclopedia of New York City. 2nd ed. 2010. Print. Adaptation Newtown Creek is a tributary of the East River. It extends inland for a distance of 3.5 miles, including a number of canals into Brooklyn, and it is the boundary between Brooklyn and Queens. The creek was the route by which European colonists first reached Maspeth in 1642. During the American Revolution the British spent the winter near the creek. Commercial vessels and small boats sailed the creek in the early nineteenth century. About 1860 the first oil and coal oil refineries opened along the banks and began dumping sludge and acids into the water; sewers were built to accommodate the growing neighborhoods of Williamsburg and Greenpoint and discharged their wastes directly into the creek, which by 1900 was known for pollution and foul odors. The water corroded the paint on the undersides of ships, and noxious deposits were left on the banks by the tides. High-level bridges were built from 1903 (some remain). State and city commissions sought unsuccessfully to improve the creek as it became of the busiest commercial waterways in the country, second only to the Mississippi River. The creek was dredged constantly and widened by the federal government to accommodate marine traffic; the creek’s natural depth was between 4 and 12 feet. After World War II the creek’s importance as a shipping route decreased, but it continued to be the site of many industrial plants. During the 1940s and 1950s, leaks at oil refineries including ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco precipitated one of the largest underground oil spills in history.
    [Show full text]
  • July 8 Grants Press Release
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Sq-23 St E
    Neighborhood Map ¯ 25-16 27-17 Riverwalk 9-19 Commons 38 Avenue 39-01 21-18 38-99 22-01 37-99 t 27-12 e 10 Street 28-17 38-01 37-31 e 38-99 r 29 Street t Roosevelt Island Q102 10-11 11 Street S n Promenade Queens Q103 i 22-18 38-99 40 Avenue Q100 39-01 Old Ridge Road a East River Q102 12 Street 23-01 28-18 LTD 38-01 M 37-49 38-99 39 Avenue Greenway 13 Street Q100 40-01 Q103 11-11 Q66 LTD Q69 38-99 23-14 24-19 39-01 29-18 Vernon Boulevard Queensbridge 38-01 38-99 Q66 North 21 StreetQ69 Roosevelt 12-15 Houses 24-20 38-99 39-01 25-19 38-99 22 Street Island 40-01 13-13 38-99 40-99 40 Avenue 25-20 Firefighters 39-01 27-19 39-99 39 Avenue Field 23 Street Queensbridge 8-25 21-19 27-20 38-99 39-01 28-11 Fisher Landau Park 41-01 24 Street Center for Art 40-01 21-22 39-99 Roosevelt 8-26 22-01 38-99 1 40-99 28-10 Island 39-01 29-19 Q102 Q103 10-25 Queensbridge North Queensbridge 22-14 39-99 40-01 Houses 23-13 Crescent Street 38-99 4 29-08 Q102 41 Avenue Library 39-01 d 41-01 Q103 40 Avenue a 39 Av o 27 Street R 39-99 t 23-02 s Queensbridge 40-01 24-11 a 39-01 E 2 South 10-26 40-99 Houses 28 StreetGrowing Up 39-99 10-25 24-16 Green Q32 40-01 25-17 Charter School Q60 Q103 21 St Q101 3 41-01 Queensbridge 29 Street Queensboro Q103 10-26 25-20 39-99 Bridge 40-01 27-15 10 Street 40-99 40 Avenue St.
    [Show full text]
  • Gowanus Canal & Newtown Creek Superfund Sites: a Proposal
    Gowanus Canal & Newtown Creek Superfund Sites: A Proposal by Larry Schnapf he federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2010 designated as fed­ eral superfund sites the entire length of T the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn and 3.8 miles of Newtown Creek on the border of Queens and Brooklyn. Property owners near these water bodies fear that EPA's action will lower property values and make it even more difficult to obtain loans and other­ wise develop their land. Many small businesses also fear that they may become responsible for paying a portion of the cleanup costs. The superfund process could take five to ten years to complete, during which time property owners will be faced with significant economic uncertainty. There is, however, a way tore­ lieve many of the smaller property owners by giving them an early release. Gowanus Canal Superfund Site The Gowanus Canal (Canal) runs for 1.8 miles through the Brooklyn residential neighborhoods of Gowanus, Park Slope, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens, TABLE CJF' CONTENTS and Red Hook. The adjacent waterfront is primarily commercial and industrial, currently consisting of Legislative Update ....................... 75 concrete plants, warehouses, and parking lots. At one CityRegs Update......................... 75 time Brooklyn Union Gas, the predecessor of National Decisions of Interest Grid, operated a large manufactured gas facility on Housing ............................ 76 the shores of the Canal. Affirmative Litigation ................. 77 EPA's initial investigation identified a variety of Human Rights ....................... 77 contaminants in the Canal's sediments including poly­ Health .............................. 79 cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organ­ Audits & Reports ..................... 79 ic contaminants (VOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls Land Use ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Reel-It-In-Brooklyn
    REEL IT IN! BROOKLYN Fish Consumption Education Project in Brooklyn ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This research and outreach project was developed by Going Coastal, Inc. Team members included Gabriel Rand, Zhennya Slootskin and Barbara La Rocco. Volunteers were vital to the execution of the project at every stage, including volunteers from Pace University’s Center for Community Action and Research, volunteer translators Inessa Slootskin, Annie Hongjuan and Bella Moharreri, and video producer Dave Roberts. We acknowledge support from Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz and funding from an Environmental Justice Research Impact Grant of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Photos by Zhennya Slootskin, Project Coordinator. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Study Area 3. Background 4. Methods 5. Results & Discussion 6. Conclusions 7. Outreach Appendix A: Survey List of Acronyms: CSO Combined Sewer Overflow DEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection DOH New York State Department of Health DPR New York City Department of Parks & Recreation EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GNRA Gateway National Recreation Area NOAA National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency OPRHP New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls WIC Women, Infant and Children program Reel It In Brooklyn: Fish Consumption Education Project Page 2 of 68 Abstract Brooklyn is one of America’s largest and fastest growing multi‐ethnic coastal counties. All fish caught in the waters of New York Harbor are on mercury advisory. Brooklyn caught fish also contain PCBs, pesticides, heavy metals, many more contaminants. The waters surrounding Brooklyn serve as a source of recreation, transportation and, for some, food.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center
    Greenpoint Energy Center Site This Upland Site Summary was authored by National Grid. The opinions, statements, and conclusions herein are solely those of National Grid. They are not adopted by and should not be attributed to any other Person. SITE NAME: NATIONAL GRID: GREENPOINT ENERGY CENTER Address: 287 Maspeth Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11211 Tax Lot Parcel(s): Brooklyn, Block 2837, Lot 1 Latitude: 40.720500 - 40° 43’ 5.30’’ Longitude: 73.931800 - 73° 55’ 51.24’’ Regulatory Programs/Numbers/Codes: NYSDEC Codes 224052, V00631, 610000X6OG - Division of Air Resources ID, (NYSDEC)00157 - Compliance Data System ID, (USEPA)NYD986871077 - Facility Index Database System ID, (USEPA)NYD006978795 - Resource Conservation Recovery Act ID , (USEPA) Plant ID 110002337784, Spill No. 9009058, 9111530, 9211562, 9301329, 9305107, 9606233, 9714234, 0004653, 0104143, 0106270, 0202908, 0303442, 0310061, 0413650, 0506134, 0908424, 0908872, 1006581, and 1012824. Analytical Data Status: Electronic Data Available Hardcopies Only No Data Available 1 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN (COPCs) TRANSPORT PATHWAYS TO THE CREEK The current understanding of the transport mechanisms of contaminants from the upland portions of the Greenpoint Energy Center (Site) to Newtown Creek is summarized in this section and Table 1. Overland Transport: No specific evidence of overland transport was identified in the available site records. The pathway has not been evaluated for completeness but will be under investigation in the near future. Bank Erosion: A relieving platform (bulkhead) adjacent to Newtown Creek extends along the eastern part of the Site. No specific evidence of bank erosion was identified in the available Draft Upland Site Summary May 2012 Newtown Creek RI/FS 1 110782-01.01 Greenpoint Energy Center Site site records.
    [Show full text]
  • HUDSON RIVER RISING Riverkeeper Leads a Growing Movement to Protect the Hudson
    Confronting climate | Restoring nature | Building resilience annual journal HUDSON RIVER RISING Riverkeeper leads a growing movement to protect the Hudson. Its power is unstoppable. RIVERKEEPER JOURNAL 01 Time and again, the public rises to speak for a voiceless Hudson. While challenges mount, our voices grow stronger. 02 RIVERKEEPER JOURNAL PRESIDENT'S LETTER Faith and action It’s all too easy to feel hopeless these days, lish over forty new tanker and barge anchorages allowing storage of crude when you think about the threat posed by climate oil right on the Hudson, Riverkeeper is working with local partners to stop disruption and the federal government’s all-out another potentially disastrous plan to build enormous storm surge barriers war on basic clean water and habitat protection at the entrance to the Hudson Estuary. Instead, we and our partners are laws. Yet, Riverkeeper believes that a better fighting for real-world, comprehensive and community-driven solutions future remains ours for the taking. to coastal flooding risks. We think it makes perfect sense to feel hope- History was made, here on the Hudson. Groundbreaking legal pro- ful, given New York’s new best-in-the-nation tections were born here, over half a century ago, when earlier waves of climate legislation and its record levels of spend- activists rose to protect the Adirondacks, the Palisades and Storm King ing on clean water (which increased by another Mountain and restore our imperiled fish and wildlife. These founders had $500 million in April). This year, The Empire State also banned river-foul- no playbook and certainly no guarantee of success.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Area: Health Advice on Eating Fish You Catch
    MAPS INSIDE NEW YORK CITY AREA Health Advice on Eating Fish You Catch 1 Why We Have Advisories Fishing is fun and fish are an important part of a healthy diet. Fish contain high quality protein, essential nutrients, healthy fish oils and are low in saturated fat. However, some fish contain chemicals at levels that may be harmful to health. To help people make healthier choices about which fish they eat, the New York State Department of Health issues advice about eating sportfish (fish you catch). The health advice about which fish to eat depends on: Where You Fish Fish from waters that are close to human activities and contamination sources are more likely to be contaminated than fish from remote marine waters. In the New York City area, fish from the Long Island Sound or the ocean are less contaminated. Who You Are Women of childbearing age (under 50) and children under 15 are advised to limit the kinds of fish they eat and how often they eat them. Women who eat highly contaminated fish and become pregnant may have an increased risk of having children who are slower to develop and learn. Chemicals may have a greater effect on the development of young children or unborn babies. Also, some chemicals may be passed on in mother’s milk. Women beyond their childbearing years and men may face fewer health risks from some chemicals. For that reason, the advice for women over age 50 and men over age 15 allows them to eat more kinds of sportfish and more often (see tables, pages 4 and 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Division Overview
    DIVISION OVERVIEW As an integral part of New York City's Department of Transportation, the Division of Bridges has a two-fold mission: to maintain an optimal transportation network by ensuring smooth mobility on the city's bridges, and to ensure the safety of the public. The New York City Department of Transportation’s Division of Bridges is comprised of five major bureaus. The Chief Bridge Officer is responsible for formulating policy and providing executive direction. He oversees all aspects of the design, construction, rehabilitation and reconstruction, maintenance, operation and administration of the 787 bridges (including 5 tunnels), and 61 culverts presently under the jurisdiction of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT). In addition to broad supervision, the Chief Bridge Officer also provides overall executive and administrative direction for the Division of Bridges, and ensures that all contractors are promptly paid. Reporting to the Chief Bridge Officer, the Community Affairs Unit maintains liaison with elected officials, community boards, community groups, and civic/neighborhood associations. The Unit takes a pro-active approach in addressing design issues, roadway closures, and detours by reaching out to communities prior to the onset of construction. This enables the Division to proceed with its rehabilitation program with community input, and allows the Agency and its contractors to co-exist in a more harmonious manner with the community surrounding the project. Issues and problems of concern to the communities
    [Show full text]
  • Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017
    Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017 Newtown Creek SAMPLES Water Quality Results from Community-Led Research, 2017 In 2017 the Newtown Creek Alliance, Table of Contents in partnership with LaGuardia Community College and the North Introduction 4 Brooklyn Boat Club, ran an extensive Combined Sewer Overflow 5 water quality program, collecting over Sampling Locations 7 2,000 points of data from seven Rainfall 9 different locations on Newtown Creek. Dissolved Oxygen 11 This report provides details on the Enterococcus 15 parameters that we tested for, trends Phosphorus 17 that were observed as well as specific Algal Blooms 18 issues we targeted through our Marine Debris 21 research. Bird Survey 22 Next Steps 23 Additional Resources 24 Funding for this report was provided by the Hudson River Foundation. 1 In 2017 the Newtown Creek Alliance, Table of Contents in partnership with LaGuardia Community College and the North Introduction 4 Brooklyn Boat Club, ran an extensive Combined Sewer Overflow 5 water quality program, collecting over Sampling Locations 7 2,000 points of data from seven Rainfall 9 different locations on Newtown Creek. Dissolved Oxygen 11 This report provides details on the Enterococcus 15 parameters that we tested for, trends Phosphorus 17 that were observed as well as specific Algal Blooms 18 issues we targeted through our Marine Debris 21 research. Bird Survey 22 Next Steps 23 Additional Resources 24 Funding for this report was provided by the Hudson River Foundation. 2 3 Introduction Newtown Creek is a 3.8 miles waterway forming the western border between the boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) Decreased to 793
    Appendix A BRIDGE CAPITAL PROGRAM East River Bridge Rehabilitation Plans A-1 Bridges Under Construction A-2 Component Rehabilitation A-3 Bridges Under Design A-4 216 2017 BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ANNUAL CONDITION REPORT APPENDIX A-1 MANHATTAN BRIDGE REHABILITATION ITEMS TOTAL ESTIMATED COST Est. Cost ($ in millions) Repair floor beams. (1982) 0.70* Replace inspection platforms, subway stringers on approach spans. (1985) 6.30* Install truss supports on suspended spans. (1985) 0.50* Partial rehabilitation of walkway. (1989) 3.00* Rehabilitate truss hangers on east side of bridge. (1989) 0.70* Install anti-torsional fix (side spans) and rehabilitate upper roadway decks on approach spans on east side; replace drainage system on approach spans, install new lighting on entire upper roadways east side, including purchase of fabricated material for west side of bridge. (1989) 40.30* Eyebar rehabilitation - Manhattan anchorage Chamber “C.” (1988) 12.20* Replacement of maintenance platform in the suspended span. (1982) 4.27* Reconstruct maintenance inspection platforms, including new rail and hanger systems and new electrical and mechanical systems; over 2,000 interim repairs to structural steel support system of lower roadway for future functioning of roadway as a detour during later construction contracts. (1992) 23.50* Install anti-torsional fix on west side (main and side spans); west upper roadway decks, replace drainage systems on west suspended and approach spans; walkway rehabilitation (install fencing, new lighting on west upper roadways
    [Show full text]