Pine Valley) February 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pine Valley) February 2015 DEER HERD UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Deer Herd Unit # 30 (Pine Valley) February 2015 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Iron and Washington counties - Boundary begins at I-15 and the Utah-Arizona state line; north on I-15 to SR-56; west on SR-56 to the Lund Highway; northwest along the Lund Highway to the Union Pacific railroad tracks at Lund; southwest on the Union Pacific railroad tracks to the Utah-Nevada state line; south on this state line to the Utah- Arizona state line; west on this state line to I-15. LAND OWNERSHIP RANGE AREA AND APPROXIMATE OWNERSHIP Year-long range Summer Range Winter Range Ownership Area % Area % Area % (acres) (acres) (acres) Forest Service 15557 23% 212454 67% 182357 38% Bureau of Land Management 47018 70% 36143 11% 210905 44% Utah State Institutional Trust Lands 830 1% 1446 <1% 22429 5% Native American Trust Lands 0 0% 5859 2% 141 <1% Private 3422 5% 13944 4% 64236 13% Department of Defense 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% USFWS Refuge 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% National Parks 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Utah State Parks 0 0% 0 0% 309 <1% Utah Division of Wildlife Resources 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Wilderness (USFS & BLM) 0 0% 47881 15% 2350 <1% TOTAL 66827 99% 317727 100% 482727 100% UNIT MANAGEMENT GOALS Manage for a population of healthy animals capable of providing a broad range of recreational opportunities, including hunting and viewing. Balance deer herd impacts on human needs, such as private property rights, agricultural crops and local economies. Maintain the population at a level that is within the long-term capability of the available habitat to support. POPULATION MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES Target Winter Herd Size - Manage for a 5-year target population of 16,000 wintering deer (modeled number) during the five-year planning period unless range conditions become unsuitable, as evaluated by DWR. Range Trend data coupled with annual browse monitoring will be used to assess habitat condition. If habitat damage by deer is occurring due to inadequate habitat, measures will be taken to reduce the population to sustainable levels. Change to the population objective is based on this population’s performance, improved range conditions, the amount of available habitat and the lack of range damage from deer. The population objective is being restored from its pre 2002 DCI reduction. Unit 30 Population Objective History 1994-2001 Objective: 16,000 2002-2014 Objective: 12,800 2015-2020 Objective: 16,000 Change from last plan +3,200 Herd Composition – This is a General Season unit and will be managed to maintain a three year average postseason buck to doe ratio of 18-20 according to the statewide plan. Caution will be use when adjusting permits and trends will be considered. General Buck Deer hunt regulations, using archery, Rifle, and Muzzleloader hunts. Antlerless removal will be implemented to achieve the target population size using a variety of harvest methods and seasons. It is recognized that buck harvest may fluctuate due to climatic and productivity variables. Buck harvest strategies will be developed through the RAC and Wildlife Board process to achieve management objectives. POPULATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Monitoring . Population Size - Utilizing harvest data, postseason and mortality estimates, a computer model has been developed to estimate winter population size. The 2014 model estimates the population at 13,500 deer. Buck Age Structure - Monitor age class structure of the buck population through the use of checking stations, postseason classification, statewide harvest survey data and bag checks. Harvest - The primary means of monitoring harvest will be through the statewide harvest survey and the use of checking stations. Year Buck Post- Post- Post-Season Objective % of harvest Season Season Population Objective F/100 doe B/100 doe 2012 1130 60.0 23.9 12,500 12,800 97.7% 2013 1327 59.3 20.6 13,000 12,800 101.6% 2014 1305 57.8 20.1 13,500 12,800 105.5% 3 Year Avg 1254 59.0 21.5 Limiting Factors (May prevent achieving management objectives) . Crop Depredation - Strategies will be implemented to mitigate crop depredation as prescribed by state law and DWR policy. Habitat - Public land winter range availability, landowner acceptance and winter range forage conditions will determine herd size. Excessive habitat utilization will be addressed with hunting. Predation - Follow DWR predator management policy: - If the population estimate is less than 90% of objective and fawn to doe ratio drops below 70 for 2 of the last 3 years or if the fawn survival rate drops below 50% for one year, then a Predator Management Plan targeting coyotes may be implemented on that subunit. - If the population estimate is less than 90% of objective and the doe survival rate drops below 85% for 2 of the last 3 years or below 80% for one year, then a Predator Management Plan targeting cougar could be implemented on that subunit. - The southern and eastern portion of this unit is currently under a Harvest Objective cougar management plan with the recent bighorn sheep transplants and the planned additional bighorn sheep transplants. Deer in the Browse and Beaver Dam mountain area will also benefit from this cougar management strategy. Highway Mortality - DWR will Cooperate with the Utah Dept. Of Transportation to construct highway fences, passage structures and warning signs etc if needed. Mortality along I-15, SR-56, SR-18 has been significant. At several locations on SR-56, SR-18, New Harmony and Newcastle bench roads flashing deer crossing signs have been installed in cooperation with the Utah Dept. Of Transportation, Iron and Washington County road departments. Deer fencing has been installed along I-15 between Cedar City and New Harmony. Highway mortality will be monitored and additional highway fences, passage structures and warning signs will be added if needed. Illegal Harvest - If illegal harvest is identified as a limiting factor, a unit specific action plan will be develop in cooperation with the Law Enforcement Section. HABITAT MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES . Maintain or enhance forage production through direct range improvements on winter and summer deer range throughout the unit to achieve population management objectives. Maintain critical fawning habitat in good condition. Fawn recruitment is a major concern on this unit and may be the single greatest factor limiting the population. Work with federal and state partners in fire rehabilitation and prevention on crucial deer habitat through the WRI process . Manage public lands adjacent to areas with heavy agricultural depredation to promote deer use during late summer. Maintain and protect critical winter range from future losses. Acquire critical winter range when the opportunity arises. HABITAT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Monitoring . Determine trends in habitat condition through permanent range trend studies, spring range assessments, pellet transects, and field inspections. Land management agencies will similarly conduct range monitoring to determine vegetative trends, utilization and possible forage conflicts. Range trend studies will be conducted by DWR to evaluate deer habitat health, trend, and carrying capacity using the deer winter range desirable component index (DCI) and other vegetation data. The DCI was created as an indicator of the general health of deer winter ranges. The index incorporates shrub cover, density and age composition as well as other key vegetation variables. Changes in DCI suggest changes in winter range capacity. However, the relationship between DCI and the changes in deer carrying capacity is difficult to quantify. Continue existing monitoring studies, and coordinate with BLM on additional riparian monitoring. Seek opportunities to partner with Universities to coordinate research in areas of need. Habitat Protection, Improvement and Maintenance . Work with public land management agencies to develop specific vegetative objectives to maintain the quality of important deer use areas. Continue to coordinate with land management agencies in planning and evaluating resource uses and developments that could impact habitat quality including but not limited to oil and gas development, wind energy, solar energy, and transmission line construction. Coordinate with federal and state partners in designing projects that will improve fire resiliency and protect areas of crucial habitat. Work toward long-term habitat protection and preservation through the use of agreements with land management agencies and local governments, and through the use of conservation easements, etc. on private lands. Continue working toward blocking up UDWR properties through land exchange. Manage vehicle access on Division of Wildlife Resources land to limit human disturbance during times of high stress, such as winter and fawning. Manage riparian areas in critical fawning habitat to furnish water, cover and succulent forage from mid- to late summer. Protect riparian areas to furnish cover, water and succulent forage adjacent to areas with historic agricultural damage. Provide guzzlers or other water sources where needed on critical summer fawning areas or in times of severe drought. Cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvement projects. Protect deer winter ranges from wildfire by reseeding burned areas, creating fuel breaks and vegetated green strips and reseed areas dominated by Cheat grass with desirable perennial vegetation. Reduce expansion of Pinion-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinion-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog, and chaining. Seek opportunities to increase browse in burned areas of critical winter range. Cooperate with federal land management agencies and local governments in developing and administering access management plans for the purposes of habitat protection and escape or security areas. Seek out opportunities to improve fawning habitat across the unit. Consider summer range habitat improvement projects that remove encroaching trees, improves succulent vegetation and wet meadow habitat, increases aspen recruitment, enhances and/or protects riparian areas, use prescribed fire to promote early succession habitats where appropriate.
Recommended publications
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 913 TRIANGULATION IN UTAH 1871-1934 J. G. STAACK Chief Topographic Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1940 Tor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents (paper) CONTENTS Page Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 Scope of report------__-_-_---_----_------------ --__---__ _ 1 Precision __ _ ________________________ _ __________________ _ ___ 1 Instruments used._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Station marks___- _ _.__ __ __ _ 2 Datum_-_-_-__ __________________________ ______ ______-___.__ 3 Methods of readjustment..._____.-.__..________.___._._...___.__ 4 Form of results__-.________________________ _.___-_____.______ 5 Arrangement__.______________________________ _ ___ _ ________ 6 Descriptions of stations._______________________________________ 6 Azimuths and distances.__ ____-_.._---_--_________ -____ __ __ ^ 7 Maps.__----__-----_-_---__-_--_-___-_-___-__-__-_-_-___.-.__ 7 Personnel_ _ __-----_-_-_---_---------_--__-____-__-_.--_.___ . 7 Projects 9 Uinta Forest Reserve, 1897-98_ 9 Cottonwood and Park City special quadrangles, 1903____ _ 19 Iron Springs special quadrangle, 1905____________________________ 22 Northeastern Utah, 1909.. -_. 26 Eastern Utah, 1910 - . 30 Logan quadrangle, 1913._________-__-__'_--______-___:_____.____ 42 Uintah County, 1913___-__. 48 Eastern Utah, 1914.. ... _ _ .. 55 Northern Utah, 1915 (Hodgeson)_____-___ __-___-_-_-__-_--. _. 58 Northern Utah, 1915 <Urquhart)_.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Element Analysis of Selected Springs in the Virgin River Basin
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1996 Trace element analysis of selected springs in the Virgin River Basin Mary A. Yelken University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, Geology Commons, and the Hydrology Commons Repository Citation Yelken, Mary A., "Trace element analysis of selected springs in the Virgin River Basin" (1996). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/3445028 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SELECTED SPRINGS IN THE VIRGIN RIVER BASIN by Mary A Yelken A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resoorces Management Department of Geoscience University ofNevada, Las Vegas May 1996 1l1c thesis of Mary A. Yelken for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Management is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Sensitive Species and Ecosystems in Utah, Endemic And
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
    [Show full text]
  • St. George Jeepers Group-Low Mountain Trail Ride
    St. George Jeepers Group-Low Mountain Trail Ride November 03, 2015 A clear, bright and sunny morning greeted the 14 vehicle assemblage as we aired down at the Black Rock exit on I-15 for our Tuesday outing. This run proved to be one of the more challenging in some time. We were led by Gus and his “fearless” navigator, Sandy Peterson. Jim Beller and his, well, perhaps underrated, Isuzu was our tail gunner. On the trail, headed for Low and Black Rock Mountains Below is an interesting artifact along the trail. This is a homemade road grader. No, it is not self propelled, the engine is for ballast. It belongs to Allen Jones. There will be more about Allen later in this report. Along the trail are several interesting signs, painted and posted by Allen Jones. They are such a pleasant relief from the “No trespassing, Do not disturb, Keep out” signs so common on the landscape anymore. Following are photos of the petroglyphs Mr. Jones directed us to in his sign, above. One of the interesting characteristics of this small collection of rock art is that there is clear evidence of a large time span of aging of the drawings. Also, as this volcanic rock is very hard the art is scratched onto the surface, rather than carved into it. Allen Jones is a soft-spoken man who obviously has a sense of humor, trust of his fellow man and a generous spirit. After leaving the rock art we next visited the “Piknik” area. The piknik area could have easily been locked up and access denied, but Allen makes it obvious that all are welcome to come, utilize and respect the area.
    [Show full text]
  • MAMMALS of the GRAND CANYON REGION by VERNON BAILEY Retired Chief Field Naturalist U
    MAMMALS of the GRAND CANYON REGION by VERNON BAILEY Retired Chief Field Naturalist U. S. Biological Survey -H.H. Sheldon Natural History Bulletin No. 1 Grand Canyon Natural History Association June 1935 Natural History Bulletin No. 1 oune, 1935 National Park Service, Grand Canyon Natural Grand Canyon National Park, History Association This bulletin is published by the Grand Canyon Natural History Association as a pro­ ject in keeping with its policy to stimulate interest and to encourage scientific research and investigation in the fields of geology, botany, zoology, ethnology, archeology and related subjects in the Grand Canyon region. This number is one of a series issued at ir­ regular intervals throughout the year. Membership to the Grand Canyon Natural History Association is $1.00 per year and covers cost of all bulletins and other pub­ lications of the Association. Additional copies of this bulletin may be obtained at 30e/ each by addressing the Grand Canyon Natural History Association, Grand Canyon Arizona. M. R. Tillotson, Edwin D. LIoKee Park Superintendent Exec Seo'y. and Editor 1 MAMMALS of the GRAND CANYON REGION By Vernon Bailey Retired Chief Field Naturalist, U. S. 3iological Survey. INTRODUCTION HE present list with brief annotations includes the mammals of the Grand Canyon National Park, the Grand Canyon National Monument and closely associated areas that naturally go with the Grand Canyon of Arizona. In this list the sequence of species is used as in various recent publications of the Biological Survey. The use of parentheses around the names of authors of species and subspecies indicates a change from the genus in which the species was originally placed.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SONG SPARROWS of the VIRGIN RIVER VALLEY, UTAH by JOE T
    122 Vol. 44 THE SONG SPARROWS OF THE VIRGIN RIVER VALLEY, UTAH By JOE T. MARSHALL, JR., and WILLIAM H. BEHLE Study of a seriesof Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) , recently collected in Wash- ington County, Utah, has brought to light one more case of racial differentiation in this exceedingly variable species. Correlated with this differentiation is a significant eco- logical separation of populations of Song Sparrows in southwestern Utah. The specimens of the series are easily separable into two distinct groups. Those taken from stream-side thickets from 4200 to 6800 feet in the Pine Valley Mountains are dark, heavily streaked and apparently typical of M. m. fallax, whereas others collected at swamps 25 miles away at 2800 feet along the Virgin River near Saint George are of a conspicuously lighter brown color and also lack the black streaks on the feathers of the dorsum which are so characteristic of fallax. These features suggest an approach to the race saltonis, yet the Virgin River Valley birds are darker than those of saltonis. While the Song Sparrows of the Virgin River Valley are thus intermediate in certain respects between fallax and saltonis, several circumstances argue against the view that they constitute an intergrading population. Although the Virgin River series exhibits the wide range of individual variation characteristic of Song Sparrows as a whole, there is, nevertheless, closer agreement among individuals of the group in their color char- acters than there is in comparable series of many other races. In addition, they exhibit a small range of variation in wing length. These features suggest a racial stock of relatively uniform genetic constitution, which view is strengthened when one considers the wide range of variation in saltonis-fallax intergrades, where the ranges of these two races adjoin.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Analysis of Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Sensitive, and Management Indicator Species of the Dixie Nationa
    LIFE HISTORY AND ANALYSIS OF ENDANGERED, THREATENED, CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, AND MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES OF THE DIXIE NATIONAL FOREST VERSION 4.0, REVISED February 2004 Formerly called: Life History of Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species of the Dixie National Forest. Compiled by: Ronald Rodriguez Contributors: Priscilla Summers, Jake Schoppe, Lisa Young, and Joanne Stenten GIS support: Matt Lee and Dustin Jensen __________________________________________ ________________________ Ronald L. Rodriguez. Wildlife, Fish and Rare Plant Date Manager, Dixie and Fishlake National Forests. TABLE OF CONTENTS Title _____ _ Page # Forest Plan Management Indicator Species Summary ............................................................................1 Forest Wide Vegetation Summary...........................................................................................................2 Population Estimates and Scale of Analysis............................................................................................3 Endangered Species .................................................................................................................................4 California Condor ........................................................................................................................4 Virgin River Chub........................................................................................................................5 Woundfin .....................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Birth and Evolution of the Virgin River Fluvial System: ~1 Km of Post–5 Ma Uplift of the Western Colorado Plateau GEOSPHERE, V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II GEOSPHERE Birth and evolution of the Virgin River fluvial system: ~1 km of post–5 Ma uplift of the western Colorado Plateau GEOSPHERE, v. 15, no. 3 Cory J. Walk1, Karl E. Karlstrom1, Ryan S. Crow2, and Matthew T. Heizler3 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, MSC03-2040, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02019.1 2U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA 3New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources–New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA 15 figures; 2 tables; 1 set of supplemental files CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] ■ ABSTRACT steepness (ksn) and low underlying mantle velocity, whereas there is a weaker correlation between high k and resistant lithologies. Basaltic volcanism has CITATION: Walk, C.J., Karlstrom, K.E., Crow, R.S., and sn Heiz ler, M.T., 2019, Birth and evolution of the Virgin The uplift history of the Colorado Plateau has been debated for over a migrated northeastward at a rate of ~18 km/Ma parallel to the Virgin River River fluvial system: ~1 km of post–5 Ma uplift of the century with still no unified hypotheses for the cause, timing, and rate of between ca. 13 and 0.5 Ma, also suggesting a mantle-driven mechanism for the western Colorado Plateau: Geosphere, v. 15, no. 3, uplift. 40Ar/39Ar and K/Ar dating of recurrent basaltic volcanism over the past combined epeirogenic uplift of the western Colorado Plateau, recurrent slip on p.
    [Show full text]
  • David Hacker CV
    DAVID B. HACKER Department of Geology, Kent State University at Trumbull 4314 Mahoning Avenue N.W., Warren, Ohio 44483 Phone: (330) 675-8831 e-mail: [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION PH.D. - DECEMBER 1998 - KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Dissertation: Catastrophic Gravity Sliding and Volcanism Associated with the Growth of Laccoliths: Examples from Early Miocene Hypabyssal Intrusions of the Iron Axis Magmatic Province, Pine Valley Mountains, Southwest Utah. Major: Applied Geology Award: Department of Geology Outstanding Ph.D. Student M.S. - AUGUST 1985 - MIAMI UNIVERSITY Thesis: Structural Geology of the Southwest Flank of the Gros Ventre Uplift, Upper Shoal Creek Area, Teton and Sublette Counties, Wyoming. Major: Geology A.B. - AUGUST 1982 - MIAMI UNIVERSITY Major: Geology PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND EMPLOYMENT: TEACHING Academic Appointments 2018-present Professor of Geology, Kent State University at Trumbull Director: Geology Summer Field Camp (2003, 2006, 2008 to present) 2006-2018 Associate Professor of Geology, Kent State University at Trumbull 2000-2006 Assistant Professor of Geology, Kent State University at Trumbull 1989-1996 Acting Director and Field Instructor, Miami University Geology Field Station; Dubois, Wyoming 1987-1989 Adjunct Professor, Youngstown State University KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Associate Professor: Trumbull Campus (August 2006 to present). With excellence in teaching emphasized at the regional campus, the course load includes five geology courses per semester. Responsibilities include teaching principles of geology to undergraduate non-majors and majors (undergraduate and graduate) with enrollment of up to 60 students per class. Courses include: All about the Oceans (formerly titled Oceanography), Environmental Geology, How the Earth Works (Earth Dynamics), How the Earth Works Lab (Earth Dynamics Lab), Earth and Life through Time (Earth History), Earth and Life through Time (Earth History Lab), and Geology of National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • “That's Some Tree!” History from Horseback Pine Valley Mountains
    “That’s Some Tree!” History from Horseback I heard the story, but didn’t believe it. A giant sequoia tree grew in the Pine Valley Mountains above St. George, Utah, in southwestern Utah. As a natural-born skeptic, I dismissed the story as apocryphal and went on feeding my four-days-a-week riding habit. I had visited the California and Oregon coasts and knew that redwoods and sequoias are coastal trees definitely not native to the Southwest. The Pine Valley Mountains are a desert range located just north of St. George and west of Zion National Park. Signal Peak towers 10,365 feet above the desert valley where I ride during the winter months. The mountains are part of the Pine Valley Wilderness which is known for its incredibly diverse plant life, but giant sequoias are not part of this natural ecosystem. Finding a coastal tree at the junction of three distinct ecological zones – the Mohave Desert, Great Basin, and Colorado Plateau – made no sense. Pine Valley Mountains If you come to ride, be prepared for steep, rocky trails with grand views. It was while riding one of these trails that I came face to bark with the mythical Pine Valley Mountains Giant Sequoia. You can actually drive to the tree in a high-clearance vehicle, but what’s the fun in that? On a good horse, you can take the circuitous and somewhat hazardous route that my Friday riding buddy, Jim, showed me recently. I’m not sure I would call Jim’s route a trail, but you have to understand he takes great delight in scaring the hell out of me.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin River Watershed Management Plan
    Virgin River Watershed Management Plan February 2006 Virgin River Watershed Management Plan i Contents Section One Watershed Management Planning . I-1 The Virgin River Watershed . I-1 Watershed Management . I-2 Watershed Management Planning . .I-4 Watershed Management Activities in the Virgin River. I-5 Current Watershed Planning Activites . .I-6 Total Maximum Daily Load I-6 Drinking Water Source Protection Plan I-8 Storm Water Management Plans I-8 The Virgin River Watershed Management Plan I-9 Use of the Watershed Management Plan . I-11 Virgin River Watershed Management Plan Mission Statement . I-13 Section Two Overview of the Virgin River Watershed . II-1 Natural Features of the Virgin River Watershed . II-2 Soils II-2 Topography II-2 Climate and Hydrology II-4 Wildlife II-4 Human Factors . II-5 Land Use II-5 Population Growth and Trends II-6 Land Ownership II-8 Stakeholders II-8 Section Three Virgin River Watershed Key Concerns. III-1 A Snapshot of the Virgin River Watershed: Establishing Overall Baseline Conditions . III-2 Water Quality III-2 Water Quantity III-8 Biological Community III-9 Habitat. .III-9 Wildlife. III-10 Contents ii Virgin River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholders’ Key Issues in Watershed Planning Areas . III-12 Water Quality Problems and Natural Resources III-13 Dissolved Solids III-14 Sedimentation III-17 Lack of Stream Flow III-18 Nutrients III-19 Healthy Land III-20 Healthy Fish and Animals III-22 Watershed Planning Area: East Fork Virgin River III-22 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-24 Riparian.Corridor.Health . III-24 Stream.Flow.Management .
    [Show full text]