DOCSLIB.ORG

Virgin River Watershed Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Virgin River Watershed Management Plan February 2006 Virgin River Watershed Management Plan i Contents Section One Watershed Management Planning . I-1 The Virgin River Watershed . I-1 Watershed Management . I-2 Watershed Management Planning . .I-4 Watershed Management Activities in the Virgin River. I-5 Current Watershed Planning Activites . .I-6 Total Maximum Daily Load I-6 Drinking Water Source Protection Plan I-8 Storm Water Management Plans I-8 The Virgin River Watershed Management Plan I-9 Use of the Watershed Management Plan . I-11 Virgin River Watershed Management Plan Mission Statement . I-13 Section Two Overview of the Virgin River Watershed . II-1 Natural Features of the Virgin River Watershed . II-2 Soils II-2 Topography II-2 Climate and Hydrology II-4 Wildlife II-4 Human Factors . II-5 Land Use II-5 Population Growth and Trends II-6 Land Ownership II-8 Stakeholders II-8 Section Three Virgin River Watershed Key Concerns. III-1 A Snapshot of the Virgin River Watershed: Establishing Overall Baseline Conditions . III-2 Water Quality III-2 Water Quantity III-8 Biological Community III-9 Habitat. .III-9 Wildlife. III-10 Contents ii Virgin River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholders’ Key Issues in Watershed Planning Areas . III-12 Water Quality Problems and Natural Resources III-13 Dissolved Solids III-14 Sedimentation III-17 Lack of Stream Flow III-18 Nutrients III-19 Healthy Land III-20 Healthy Fish and Animals III-22 Watershed Planning Area: East Fork Virgin River III-22 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-24 Riparian.Corridor.Health . III-24 Stream.Flow.Management . III-24 Erosion.Control. III-24 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . III-24 Pinyon-Juniper.Management. III-25 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems . III-25 Watershed Planning Area: North Fork Virgin River III-25 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-27 Natural.Stream.Function. III-27 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . III-27 Wastewater.Disposal. III-27 Recreation. III-28 Watershed Planning Area: Upper Virgin River III-28 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-28 Riparian.Corridor.Health . III-28 Natural.Erosion . III-30 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . III-30 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems . III-30 Watershed Planning Area: Ash Creek/La Verkin Creek III-30 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-32 Maintenance.of.Year.Round.Flow.Flow . III-32 Riparian.Corridor.Health . III-32 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems . III-33 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . III-33 Vegetation.Management . III-33 Watershed Planning Area: Lower Virgin River III-35 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-35 Floodplain.Management . III-35 Wastewater.Disposal. III-36 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . III-36 Water.Quality.Monitoring . III-36 Contents Virgin River Watershed Management Plan iii Watershed Planning Area: Upper Santa Clara River III-37 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-37 Riparian.Corridor.Health . III-37 Runoff.Storage.Through.Reservoirs. III-39 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems . III-39. Native.Species. III-39 Watershed Planning Area: Lower Santa Clara River III-39 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?.. III-41 Riparian.Corridor.Health . III-41 Maintenance.of.Year.Round.Flow.Conditions . III-41 Increased.Off-Highway.Vehicle.Activity.. III-42 Native.Species. III-42 Water.Quality.Monitoring . III-42 Watershed Planning Area: Beaver Dam Wash/Fort Pearce Wash III-42 What.Are.Stakeholders’.Key.Concerns?. III-44 Water.Quality.Monitoring . III-44 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . .III-44 Watershed-Wide.Key.Concerns. III-45 Ground.Water. III-45 Social.Considerations . III-45 Public.Education.and.Outreach. III-46 Section Four Strategic Action Plan. IV-1 Selecting Appropriate Watershed Management Practices . IV-3 Potential Causes of Stream Impairment . IV-3 Recommended Management Practices for the Virgin River Watershed . IV-5 Watershed-Wide Issues and Recommended Management Practices . IV-6 Maintenance of Stream Flow IV-6 Recommendations.to.help.maintain.continuous.and.year-round.flow. IV-9 Dissolved Solids IV-9 Recommendations.to.decrease.dissolved.solids . IV-10 Nutrients IV-10 Recommendations.to.reduce.nutrient.levels. IV-11 Stream and Land Changes IV-11 Land.Use.Recommendations . IV-12 Stream.Recommendations. IV-12 Flooding IV-13 Flooding.Recommendations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. IV-13 Wildfires IV-13 Recommendations. IV-14 Contents iv Virgin River Watershed Management Plan Native Fishes IV-14 Recommendations.for.Recovery.of.Native.Fishes. IV-15 Ground Water IV-16 Recommended.Management.Practices.to.Protect.Groundwater.and.. Understand.Groundwater.Resources . IV-16 Social Considerations IV-18 Recommendations.to.address.Social.Considerations. IV-18 Public Education and Outreach IV-18 Plan.to.educate.and.reach.out.to.the.public. IV-19 Recommended Activities and Management Practices for Key Issues and Concerns by Watershed Planning Area . IV-19 East Fork Virgin River IV-19 Stream.Bank.Stabilization . IV-20 North Fork Virgin River IV-20 Maintenance.of.Minimum.Flow . IV-21 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . IV-21 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.System.Density. IV-22 Recreation. IV-22 Upper Virgin River IV-23 Pah.Tempe.Hot.Springs . IV-23 Ash Creek/La Verkin Creek IV-25 Maintenance.of.Natural.Flow.Conditions. IV-26 Riparian.Corridor.Health . IV-27 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems.. IV-27 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . IV-27 Vegetation.Management . IV-27 Lower Virgin River IV-27 Floodplain.Management. IV-28 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems. IV-29 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species. IV-29 Water.Quality.Monitoring . IV-30 Upper Santa Clara River IV-31 Riparian.Corridor.Health . IV-31 Runoff.Storage.Through.Reservoirs. IV-32 Wastewater.Disposal.and.Septic.Systems.. IV-32 Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . IV-32 Lower Santa Clara River IV-32 Riparian.Corridor.Health . IV-33 Maintenance.of.Year.Round.Stream.Flow.. IV-33 Increased.Off-Highway.Vehicle.Activity. IV-34 Contents Virgin River Watershed Management Plan v Threatened.and.Endangered.Species . IV-34 Water.Quality.Monitoring . IV-34 Beaver Dam Wash/Fort Pearce Wash IV-35 Water.Quality.Monitoring . IV-36 Summary of Watershed Problems and Concerns . IV-36 Recommended Projects to Address Problems and Issues in the Watershed . IV-38 Ranking of Projects IV-39 Watershed Management . IV-39 Section Five References . V-1 Contents vi Virgin River Watershed Management Plan Contents Virgin River Watershed Management Plan I-1 Section One Watershed Management Planning The Virgin River Watershed HE VIRGIN RIVER WATERSHED is an area Tof land that covers portions of southwest Utah, southeast Nevada, and northwest Arizona (Figure I-1). To trace the Virgin River watershed on a map, you would begin in the southwestern corner of Iron County and trace the watershed boundary in a southeasterly direction into Washington County, through the Dixie National Forest where Moody Wash and Magotsu Creek begin to form the Santa Clara River. Follow the boundary of the Virgin River watershed east along the northern portion of Washington County past Route 18, where it dips south again, and heads north back into Iron County moving east past Kanarraville and Route 16 and past Route 14. Here the watershed boundary begins to dip south again, crossing into Kane County where Deep Creek and the North Fork of the Virgin River have their origin. The boundary rises north to where Routes 14 and 89 intersect, just west of Alton, Section One Watershed Management Planning I-2 Virgin River Watershed Management Plan and then runs south parallel to Kanab Creek just east of Glen- What Is a Watershed? dale, Orderville, Mount Carmel and Mount Carmel Junction. A watershed is a geographic area that drains If you wanted to trace the boundaries of the entire Virgin River to a common outlet such as a point on a watershed, you would cross the Nevada and Arizona borders. larger stream, a lake, an underlying aquifer, Given that this plan focuses on the portion of the Virgin River an estuary, or an ocean. Natural features watershed within Utah’s boundaries, you can trace the Arizona- define the boundaries of a watershed, not Utah border as the southern boundary of the watershed and the political or jurisdictional boundaries. As a Nevada-Utah border as the western boundary of the watershed. result, watershed boundaries may transect However, the watershed itself never.
Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR

    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR

    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National

    Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National

    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona

    Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona

    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
  • Grand Canyon National Park U.S

    Grand Canyon National Park U.S

    National Park Service Grand Canyon National Park U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper North Rim 2015 Season The Guide North Rim Information and Maps Roosevelt Point, named for President Theodore Roosevelt who in 1908, declared Grand Canyon a national monument. Grand Canyon was later established as a national park in 1919 by President Woodrow Wilson. Welcome to Grand Canyon S ITTING ATOP THE K AIBAB a meadow, a mother turkey leading her thunderstorms, comes and goes all too flies from the South Rim, the North Plateau, 8,000 to 9,000 feet (2,400– young across the road, or a mountain quickly, only to give way to the colors Rim offers a very different visitor 2,750 m) above sea level with lush lion slinking off into the cover of the of fall. With the yellows and oranges of experience. Solitude, awe-inspiring green meadows surrounded by a mixed forest. Visitors in the spring may see quaking aspen and the reds of Rocky views, a slower pace, and the feeling of conifer forest sprinkled with white- remnants of winter in disappearing Mountain maple, the forest seems to going back in time are only a few of the barked aspen, the North Rim is an oasis snowdrifts or temporary mountain glow. Crispness in the air warns of winter many attributes the North Rim has in the desert. Here you may observe lakes of melted snow. The summer, snowstorms soon to come. Although to offer. Discover the uniqueness of deer feeding, a coyote chasing mice in with colorful wildflowers and intense only 10 miles (16 km) as the raven Grand Canyon’s North Rim.
  • December 2012 Number 1

    December 2012 Number 1

    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
  • Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934

    Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 913 TRIANGULATION IN UTAH 1871-1934 J. G. STAACK Chief Topographic Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1940 Tor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents (paper) CONTENTS Page Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 Scope of report------__-_-_---_----_------------ --__---__ _ 1 Precision __ _ ________________________ _ __________________ _ ___ 1 Instruments used._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Station marks___- _ _.__ __ __ _ 2 Datum_-_-_-__ __________________________ ______ ______-___.__ 3 Methods of readjustment..._____.-.__..________.___._._...___.__ 4 Form of results__-.________________________ _.___-_____.______ 5 Arrangement__.______________________________ _ ___ _ ________ 6 Descriptions of stations._______________________________________ 6 Azimuths and distances.__ ____-_.._---_--_________ -____ __ __ ^ 7 Maps.__----__-----_-_---__-_--_-___-_-___-__-__-_-_-___.-.__ 7 Personnel_ _ __-----_-_-_---_---------_--__-____-__-_.--_.___ . 7 Projects 9 Uinta Forest Reserve, 1897-98_ 9 Cottonwood and Park City special quadrangles, 1903____ _ 19 Iron Springs special quadrangle, 1905____________________________ 22 Northeastern Utah, 1909.. -_. 26 Eastern Utah, 1910 - . 30 Logan quadrangle, 1913._________-__-__'_--______-___:_____.____ 42 Uintah County, 1913___-__. 48 Eastern Utah, 1914.. ... _ _ .. 55 Northern Utah, 1915 (Hodgeson)_____-___ __-___-_-_-__-_--. _. 58 Northern Utah, 1915 <Urquhart)_.
  • Executive Summary U.S

    Executive Summary U.S

    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
  • Floods of December 1966 in Southwestern Utah

    Floods of December 1966 in Southwestern Utah

    LIBRARY COPY U.S.GEOLC: 'URVEY.WBF iROUA, MfiSQUBL Floods of December 1966 In Southwestern Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-A Floods of December 1966 In Southwestern Utah By ELMER BUTLER and J. C. MUNDORFF FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________________ Al Introduction. ____________________________ 1 Physical setting-_____________________ 2 Precipitation.. _ ______________________ 5 Streamflow- _____________________________ 6 Description of the floods_____________ 6 Determination of flood discharges____. 7 Stages and discharges at selected sites___ 9 Summary of flood stages and discharges. 10 Water quality.___________________________ 11 Flood damage_____-__-____---_-_-___-____ 19 Selected references..______________________ 26 Station data_____________________________ 27 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Map of southwestern Utah showing stream-gaging and water-quality sampling sites, geology, vegeta­ tion, and precipitation at selected sites during period December 3-7, 1966____________________________ In pocket 2. Maps showing location and size of radar echoes in parts of Nevada, Arizona, and Utah during December 3-6, 1966________________________________________ In pocket FIGURE 1. Map showing altitudes in part of southwestern Utah_____ A3 2. Map showing normal annual precipitation in part of south­ western Utah-________-_______________---_-_-----_ 4 3. Hydrograph of discharge at selected gaging stations in the Virgin River basin_________________________________ 8 4. Hydrograph of discharge at selected gaging stations in the Santa Clara River basin___________________------___ 9 5.
  • Quantifying the Base Flow of the Colorado River: Its Importance in Sustaining Perennial Flow in Northern Arizona And

    Quantifying the Base Flow of the Colorado River: Its Importance in Sustaining Perennial Flow in Northern Arizona And

    1 * This paper is under review for publication in Hydrogeology Journal as well as a chapter in my soon to be published 2 master’s thesis. 3 4 Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and 5 southern Utah 6 7 Riley K. Swanson1* 8 Abraham E. Springer1 9 David K. Kreamer2 10 Benjamin W. Tobin3 11 Denielle M. Perry1 12 13 1. School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, US 14 email: [email protected] 15 2. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, US 16 3. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, US 17 *corresponding author 18 19 Abstract 20 Water in the Colorado River is known to be a highly over-allocated resource, yet decision makers fail to consider, in 21 their management efforts, one of the most important contributions to the existing water in the river, groundwater. This 22 failure may result from the contrasting results of base flow studies conducted on the amount of streamflow into the 23 Colorado River sourced from groundwater. Some studies rule out the significance of groundwater contribution, while 24 other studies show groundwater contributing the majority flow to the river. This study uses new and extant 1 25 instrumented data (not indirect methods) to quantify the base flow contribution to surface flow and highlight the 26 overlooked, substantial portion of groundwater. Ten remote sub-basins of the Colorado Plateau in southern Utah and 27 northern Arizona were examined in detail.
  • Vendor List by City

    Vendor List by City

    Revised 2/20/14 Vendor List by City Antimony Otter Creek State Park 400 East SR 22 435-624-3268 Beaver Beaver Sport & Pawn 91 N Main 435-438-2100 Blanding Edge of the Cedars/Goosenecks State Parks 660 West 400 North 435-678-2238 Bluffdale Maverik 14416 S Camp Williams Rd 801-446-1180 Boulder Anasazi State Park 46 North Hwy 12 435-335-7308 Brian Head Brian Head Sports Inc 269 South Village Way 435-677-2014 Thunder Mountain Motorsports 539 North Highway 143 435-677-2288 1 Revised 2/20/14 Cannonville Kodachrome State Park 105 South Paria Lane 435-679-8562 Cedar City D&P Performance 110 East Center 435-586-5172 Frontier Homestead State Park 635 North Main 435-586-9290 Maverik 809 W 200 N 435-586-4737 Maverik 204 S Main 435-586-4717 Maverik 444 W Hwy 91 435-867-1187 Maverik 220 N Airport Road 435-867-8715 Ron’s Sporting Goods 138 S Main 435-586-9901 Triple S 151 S Main 435-865-0100 Clifton CO Maverik 3249 F Road 970-434-3887 2 Revised 2/20/14 Cortez CO Mesa Verde Motorsports 2120 S Broadway 970-565-9322 Delta Maverik 44 N US Hwy 6 Dolores Colorado Lone Mesa State Park 1321 Railroad Ave 970-882-2213 Duchesne Starvation State Park Old Hwy 40 435-738-2326 Duck Creek Loose Wheels Service Inc. 55 Movie Ranch Road 435-682-2526 Eden AMP Recreation 2429 N Hwy 158 801-614-0500 Maverik 5100 E 2500 N 801-745-3800 Ephraim Maverik 89 N Main 435-283-6057 3 Revised 2/20/14 Escalante Escalante State Park 710 North Reservoir Road 435-826-4466 Evanston Maverik 350 Front Street 307-789-1342 Maverik 535 County Rd 307-789-7182 Morgan Valley Polaris 1624 Harrison
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017

    I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017

    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County