ISSUE 5 • June 2014 Lee Hsien Loong Greg Clark Singapore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISSUE 5 • June 2014 Lee Hsien Loong Greg Clark Singapore June 2014 • ISSUE 5 INTERVIEW Lee Hsien Loong Greg Clark CASE STUDY Singapore Yokohama Medellín ESSAY Pablo Vaggione & Elyssa Ludher Jeremy Bentham Peter Lacy & Ynse de Boer CITY FOCUS Suzhou OPINION Isher Judge Ahluwalia Chua Beng Huat A biannual magazine published by Advisory Panel Image Credits Dr Liu Thai Ker (Chairman) Accenture: 85, 88, 90 Chairman Agencia de Cooperación e Inversión de Medellín y el Área Centre for Liveable Cities Metropolitana: 62 (below), 64, 65, 66 Dr Isher Judge Ahluwalia Bilbao International, Bilbao Ekintza: 68-69 bram_souffreau: 72 (below) CC by-SA 2.0 Chairperson, Board of Governors Cabinet Office: 26 CC by-NC-ND 2.0; edited, 30-31 Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations Carlos Andres Mesa Giraldo: 74 CC by 2.0 Bindu N. Lohani Chua Beng Huat: 105 Vice-President for Knowledge Management and Sustainable Development City of Yokohama: 47, 48 Asian Development Bank Daniel Latorre: 62 (above) CC by 2.0 Darren Chan – www.flickr.com/thesingaporeidler: 34-35 Yumiko Noda Department of Publicity of Suzhou Industrial Park: 70 (above), Partner and Head of PPP, Infrastructure & Government, Asia-Pacific 92-93 PricewaterhouseCoopers Diane Griffiths: 28 CC by 2.0 Tan Gee Paw Gui Hua (归华): 98 Chairman Iris Taani, SUN Development, VPUU: 72 (above) PUB, Singapore’s National Water Agency Isher Judge Ahluwalia: 100 jacksim.asia: 19, 23 Prof Marilyn Jordan Taylor Jim Moran: 29 CC by-NC-ND 2.0 Dean of the School of Design Marcin Wichary: 71 CC by 2.0 University of Pennsylvania Milton Correa: 70 (below) CC by 2.0 Ministry of Communications and Information: 21 Editorial Team Omar Uran: 60-61 CC by 2.0; edited Dinesh Naidu Phil Long: 31 CC by 2.0 Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong: 20 Joanna Yong Robert Huffstutter: 42-43 CC by 2.0; edited Nicole Chew Shell International BV: 77, 78, 79 Source: Lianhe Zaobao © Singapore Press Holdings Limited. Design Consultant Reproduced with permission: 24 Green House Design + Communications Pte Ltd Suzhou City Park Management: 95 Taku: 73 CC by-NC-ND 2.0 Editorial Consultant ume-y: 46 (below) CC by 2.0; edited University of Sheffield AMRC: 32 Tuber Productions Pte Ltd Urban Redevelopment Authority: 36, 38, 39, 40 Waterways Watch Society: 52-53, 54, 56, 57, 58 Advertisement Sales Ye Jun (叶军): 94 MultiNine Corporation Pte Ltd Yokohama Convention & Visitors Bureau: 46 (above) Advertisement sales enquiries: Trevor Teh Yoshikazu Takada: 44 CC by 2.0 T +65 6281 8888 E [email protected] Yu Da Bo (郁大波): 96, 97 CC by 2.0 is a biannual magazine published by the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Centre for Liveable Cities. CC by-SA 2.0 E-version: www.clc.gov.sg/Publications/urbansolutions.htm http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode CC by-NC-ND 2.0 Set up in 2008 by Singapore Ministry of National Development (MND) and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/legalcode the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources, the Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC) has as its mission “to distil, create and share knowledge on Some original images have been edited for page layout liveable and sustainable cities”. CLC’s work spans three main areas – purposes. Every effort has been made to trace the copyright Research, Capability Development, and Promotions. Though these activities, holders. The publisher will correct any omission of due CLC hopes to provide urban leaders and practitioners with the knowledge acknowledgement in the online version, and in any and support needed to make our cities better. www.clc.org.sg subsequent printing. CLC is a division of ISSN 2301-3540 (print) ISSN 2301-3532 (e-version) © 2014 Centre For Liveable Cities, Singapore Cover: Historic canal in Suzhou, recipient of the Lee Kuan Yew World City Prize 2014. Opinions expressed in URBAN SOLUTIONS do not necessarily Photo courtesy of Pingjiang Historic District Preservation & Restoration Co., Ltd. represent the views of CLC. While the publisher has taken reasonable care in compiling the magazine, it shall not be URBAN SOLUTIONS welcomes feedback from readers. liable for any omission, error or inaccuracy. Contact Dinesh Naidu T +65 6645 9574 E [email protected] 45 Maxwell Road #07-01, The URA Centre, Singapore 069118 Contents From the Executive Director 16 INTERVIEW Lee Hsien Loong 18 Greg Clark 26 CASE STUDY Draft Master Plan 2013 34 SINGAPORE Minato Mirai 21 42 YOKOHAMA 18 42 Contents CASE STUDY Waterways Watch Society 52 SINGAPORE A Better City Through Mobility 60 MEDELLÍN ESSAY What Lies Behind Successful, Liveable Cities 68 PABLO VAGGIONE & ELYSSA LUDHER Why Compact Cities are the Future 76 JEREMY BENTHAM 60 68 Contents ESSAY The Seven Steps to Sustainability 84 PETER LACY & YNSE DE BOER CITY FOCUS Suzhou 92 OPINION Viewpoint: The Case for “Shared Solutions” 100 ISHER JUDGE AHLUWALIA Counterpoint: The Limits to “Shared Solutions” 104 CHUA BENG HUAT 92 100 From theExecutive Director This special issue of focuses on the Compact-Accenture CEO Study WORLD CITIES SUMMIT in June A highlight of the Summit is on Sustainability, and propose 2014 and its theme “Liveable the LEE KUAN YEW WORLD a seven-step roadmap for and Sustainable Cities: Common CITY PRIZE, and our City Focus effective action. Challenges, Shared Solutions”. section spotlights this year’s We explore major challenges that laureate, the beautiful city Finally, our Opinion section today’s cities face, and proven of Suzhou. The two Special interrogates the Summit’s theme solutions from around the world. Mention cities – Yokohama and of “shared solutions”. Indian We also ask how the public, Medellín – are also profiled in urban expert Dr Isher Ahluwalia, private and people sectors, as well our Case Study section, alongside who is a Summit speaker and as different cities, can learn from Singapore studies that showcase a recent CLC Visiting Fellow, and collaborate with each other. collaboration within and across persuasively makes the case that the public and people sectors. it is both possible and important In our Interview with Singapore’s for cities to share and learn from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, An Essay by Centre for Liveable each other. Eminent Singaporean the Opening Ceremony Guest Cities (CLC) researchers, sociologist Professor Chua Beng of Honour, learn what liveability analysing how cities overcome Huat then provides a provocative means personally to him, and their challenges to achieve and necessary counterpoint – what he thinks Singapore can advances in liveability, is adapted highlighting the serious, and learn from others. In another from their chapter in a new occasionally comic, limits to Interview, UK Minister of State book on the CLC Liveability such sharing. for Cities and the Constitution Framework that we will launch and Summit plenary speaker at the Summit. Elsewhere, Whatever your geographical, Greg Clark calls for cities to “lead plenary speaker Jeremy Bentham organisational or ideological from the front”, and explains how draws on Shell’s research with background, we welcome all Britain is pioneering “City Deals” CLC and others to advocate of you in the business of urban to enable this. resource-efficient compact cities, planning, development and and how dynamic governance governance to join us – at the can enable their development. WORLD CITIES SUMMIT or here in In another Essay, Peter Lacy – as we learn and Ynse de Boer reveal urgent from, and inspire, each other to findings from the UN Global keep doing better. Khoo Teng Chye Executive Director Centre for Liveable Cities “You must be able to play well — which means a green environment, and opportunities for leisure, culture, the human spirit. “ Lee Singapore Hsien Loong FULFILLING THE HUMAN SPIRIT n this interview on 3 April 2014 with Executive Director Khoo Teng Chye and I Koh Buck Song of the Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong gives his take on urban liveability and describes his hopes for his country 100 years ahead. He also reveals which other cities he looks to, and what tips Singapore might offer on sustaining a liveable city that meets everyday needs while also fulfilling the human spirit. Of all the many aspects of liveability, which are the ones You must be able to play really close to your heart? well – which means a A liveable city is a place where green environment, and people can live, work and play, and opportunities for leisure, fulfil the human spirit. You want to be able to live well – good homes, culture, the human spirit. good neighbourhoods, orderly and safe streets and environment. You must be able to work well – there must be jobs, opportunities, economic growth. You must be able to play well – which means a green environment, and opportunities for leisure, culture, the human spirit. To bring them all together, you must have the governance to make the “big software” work, to pull it all together so that when people come to this place, they say: “Yes, I want to be here.” “You must be able to play well — which means a green environment, and opportunities for leisure, culture, the human spirit. “ spirit. the human culture, leisure, for opportunities and environment, agreen —which means well play to be able must “You Mr Lee, during his interview attheIstana. Mr Lee,during his interview 19 ISSUE 5 •June 2014 interview Does the fact that Singapore has a dense urban environment as well as lots of greenery give you a different perspective on the major concerns in the world today on enhancing the liveability of cities? Our problems are easier because we are a city in a country, and the country is surrounded by water. It’s a controlled environment. If we decide to do something, we can make it happen in all of Singapore.
Recommended publications
  • Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities 469190 789811 9 Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore
    Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Inter-religious harmony is critical for Singapore’s liveability as a densely populated, multi-cultural city-state. In today’s STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS world where there is increasing polarisation in issues of race and religion, Singapore is a good example of harmonious existence between diverse places of worship and religious practices. This has been achieved through careful planning, governance and multi-stakeholder efforts, and underpinned by principles such as having a culture of integrity and innovating systematically. Through archival research and interviews with urban pioneers and experts, Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities documents the planning and governance of religious harmony in Singapore from pre-independence till the present and Communities Practices Spaces, Religious Harmony in Singapore: day, with a focus on places of worship and religious practices. Religious Harmony “Singapore must treasure the racial and religious harmony that it enjoys…We worked long and hard to arrive here, and we must in Singapore: work even harder to preserve this peace for future generations.” Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore. Spaces, Practices and Communities 9 789811 469190 Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Urban Systems Studies Books Water: From Scarce Resource to National Asset Transport: Overcoming Constraints, Sustaining Mobility Industrial Infrastructure: Growing in Tandem with the Economy Sustainable Environment:
    [Show full text]
  • List of Interviews
    LIST OF INTERVIEWS The dates of interviews by person and designation, as well as site visits were as follows. 6 Feb. 2017 Mr. Harry Seah, Director of Technology, PUB. 7 Feb. 2017 Mr. Tan Nguan Sen, Chief Sustainability Officer, PUB. 8 Feb, 2017 Mr. Khew Sin Khoon, CEO, CPG Consultants. 9 Feb. 2017 Mr. Tan Gee Paw, Chairman, PUB. 9 Feb. 2017 Mr. Kenneth Er, CEO, NParks and Dr. Leong Chee Chiew, DCEO, NParks. 9 Feb. 2017 Mr. Richard Hassel and Mr. Wong Mun Summ, Co-Founders, WOHA. 10 Feb. 2017 Mr. Loh Ah Tuan, Former DCEO, NEA. 10 Feb. 2017 Mr. Tobias Baur, Managing Director, Ramboll Studio Dreiseitl Singapore. 10 Feb. 2017 Bukit Timah Reserve site visit. 10 Feb. 2017 Eco-Link@BKE (Bukit Timah Expressway) site visit. 11 Feb. 2017 Alexandra Canal site visit. 11 Feb. 2017 Central Catchment Nature Reserve site visit. 11 Feb. 2017 Singapore Botanic Gardens (Herbarium and Laboratories) site visit. 15 Feb. 2017 Dr. Tan Wee Kiat, CEO, Gardens by the Bay. 22 Jun. 2017 Mr. Yong Wei Hin, Director, Deep Tunnel Sewage System, PUB. 22 Jun. 2017 Mr. Lim Liang Jim, Director, Industrt and Centre for Urban Greenery and Ecology, NParks. 22 Jun. 2017 Dr. Lena Chan, Director, National Biodiversity Centre, Nparks. 130 LIST OF INTERVIEWS 22 Jun. 2017 Mr Harry Seah, Chief Technology Officer, PUB 22 Jun. 2017 Sinspring Desalination Plant, Tuas, site visit. 22 Jun. 2017 Bedok NEWater Plant, site visit. 23 Jun. 2017 Mr. Khoo Teng Chye, Executive Director, CLC. 15 Aug. 2017 Ms. Olivia Lum, Founder, Hyflux. 15 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion on Architecture, Literature and the City Domestic Digressions
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 02 Oct 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Companion on Architecture, Literature and The City Jonathan Charley Domestic digressions Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315613154-4 Lilian Chee Published online on: 17 Aug 2018 How to cite :- Lilian Chee. 17 Aug 2018, Domestic digressions from: The Routledge Companion on Architecture, Literature and The City Routledge Accessed on: 02 Oct 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315613154-4 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 Domestic digressions Interrogating Singaporean public housing through its literary forms Lilian Chee With over eighty-two percent of the Singaporean population residing in public housing flats, the setting of the public housing estate is, not unexpectedly, a recurring subject in Singapore’s post-independence literature, the latter produced chiefly after the nation-state’s self-governance in 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • As Part of the Nationwide Efforts To
    Plan of Singapore town and its adjoining districts, surveyed by J. T. Thomson, 1846 Image courtesy of National Archives of Singapore FOREWORD s part of the nationwide efforts to remote location meant that residents had to band commemorate two centuries of Singapore’s together as they collectively navigated the challenges A history since the arrival of the British, confronting Singapore during its early years. Bishan, MUSE SG will launch a special four-part bicentennial on the other hand, has had to deal with its reputation commemorative series in 2018 and 2019. The four- as one of Singapore’s most haunted locales. By part series will look back and examine how our facing their challenges head-on, both towns manage place histories have shaped and contributed to the to overcome the odds, while developing their own Singapore Story. unique identities. This is the first issue of the above series and it Finally, our articles on Yishun, Punggol and Pasir Ris showcases different aspects of Singapore’s place feature heart-warming tales of towns that refuse to let history through the stories of a number of towns. their future be boxed in by their past or circumstance. The histories of these towns are complex and multi- Despite negative press reports, war-time tragedies layered, and forged by government policies, war, trade and exclusive beginnings, these towns managed to and geography. Through the sharing of Singapore’s reinvent themselves into estates known for their place history, we hope to bring about a deeper idyllic surrounds and modern amenities. appreciation of the unique heritage of the various towns and estates in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Acquisition of the Entire Issued and Paid-Up Share Capital of Rsp Architects Planners & Engineers
    ROWSLEY LTD. (Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore) Company Registration No. 199908381D (A) PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF THE ENTIRE ISSUED AND PAID-UP SHARE CAPITAL OF RSP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS & ENGINEERS (PTE) LTD; (B) PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF VACANT LAND LOCATED IN THE ISKANDAR DEVELOPMENT REGION, JOHOR BAHRU, MALAYSIA; AND (C) PROPOSED BONUS ISSUE OF FREE WARRANTS TO EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS 1. INTRODUCTION The board of directors (the “Directors”) of Rowsley Ltd. (the “Company” and together with its subsidiaries, the “Group”) wishes to announce the following: (i) the Company has entered into a non-binding term sheet with Messrs Albert Hong Hin Kay, Lee Kut Cheung, Lai Huen Poh, Liu Thai Ker and Hud Abu Bakar (collectively, the “RSP Vendors”) in relation to the proposed acquisition by the Company and/or its wholly-owned subsidiary of the entire issued and paid-up share capital of RSP Architects Planners & Engineers (Pte) Ltd (“RSP”) for a consideration of up to S$223 million (“RSP Consideration”) to be satisfied by way of allotment and issuance of ordinary shares in the capital of the Company (“Shares”) at an issue price of S$0.150 per Share (the “RSP Acquisition”); (ii) the Company has entered into another non-binding term sheet with Vantage Bay Sdn Bhd (“Vantage”) in relation to the proposed acquisition by the Company and/or its wholly-owned subsidiary of parcels of vacant land located within the Iskandar development region, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, measuring approximately 9.23 hectares (the “Land”), for a consideration of S$358 million
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Urban Futures
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Asian Urban Futures Author: Chris Abel, University of Sydney Subjects: Building Case Study Urban Design Keyword: Urban Design Publication Date: 2000 Original Publication: Architecture and Identity Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Chris Abel 18 ASIAN URBAN FUTURES Based on a paper presented to the Asia Design Forum No. 9, Kuala Lumpur, June 13–14, 1998. While students of urban growth and form in the West have long enjoyed the benefit of well-established bodies of theoretical and empirical know- ledge, comparable studies in the developing world lag behind what often seems like an uncontrollable speed of events. With the prospect already looming of more Asian megacities of 20 to 30 million population early in the next century, the statistics are frightening in themselves.1 The difficulty for planners and other decision makers, however, lies not just with the rate or even the vast scale of urban development, but with the lack of appropriate models equivalent to Western theoretical tools which might help to make sense of these extraordinary phenomena, and, hopefully, to prescribe solutions to the enormous problems they raise.2 The temptation in these circumstances for developing world theorists to reach for Western urban models to explain or prescribe for essentially different historical or contemporary situations, coupled with the widespread lack of open or critical debate of current urban programmes, only worsens matters. Any conscious effort by Asian urbanists to break out of this impasse and create an alternative approach to planning and design born of their own cultures and histories, if only in part, is therefore to be greatly welcomed.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterplanning
    MASTERPLANNING COMMERCIAL • EDUCATION • HEALTHCARE • HOSPITALITY • INTERIORS • MASTERPLANNING • MIXED USE & RETAIL• RESIDENTIAL CONTENTS UAE Embassy Concept Design | UAE 01 THE COMPANY 01.01 Profile 01.02 Services 01.03 Sectors 02 MASTERPLANNING 02.01 Philosophy 02.02 Focus 02.03 Projects 02.04 Experts 03 GLOBAL RECOGNITION 3 01 THE COMPANY 01.01 Profile 01.02 Services 01.03 Sectors 01 SINGAPORE DUBAI LONDON BEIJING SHANGHAI KUALA LUMPUR HANOI HO CHI MINH CHENNAI BANGALORE PUNE HYDERABAD NEW DELHI MUMBAI ACCRA * Registration in progress PROFILE THE COMPANY RSP started out as a small partnership, Raglan Squire & Partners in 1956. It has since 2500+ then grown in scope and scale to become one of the largest and most established PROJECTS WORLDWIDE practices in Asia. RSP Architects Planners and Engineers is a well respected multi-disciplinary 1300+ corporation. The Group’s services range from cutting-edge master-planning & urban EXPERTS & design to world-class architecture, engineering and interior design. PROFESSIONALS RSP is a Singapore-based firm, which has gained international recognition as an 50+ Architectural Practice with well established offices in China, India, Malaysia, UAE, YEARS OF UK and Vietnam; in addition to operations in numerous countries in South East Asia EXCELLENCE and the GCC. 15 With a talent pool of more than 1,300 experts and professionals, RSP has been GLOBAL delivering expertise and quality, on time and on budget, for more than half-a-century. DESIGN HUBS 7 SERVICES THE COMPANY Profile Services Sectors RSP’s strength lies in providing a complete solution to our clients’ development needs, with our integrated multi-disciplinary professional building consultancy services.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fine Romance the Shapers of Singapore’S Cityscape and Its National Brand Tell Hong Xinyi What It Takes to Design a Loveable City
    A FINE ROMANCE The shapers of Singapore’s cityscape and its national brand tell Hong Xinyi what it takes to design a loveable city ome say that every story is a love story—even, it seems, the modern its Design 2025 report: “Singapore will extend beyond a liveable city and become a loveable Singapore story, whose opening chapters began with a dose of tough love. city.” In this new chapter of the Singapore story, design will help power an innovation-driven In 1967, the government announced its intention to transform the newly economy, and strengthen the national identity by creating better spaces and services. independent nation into a Garden City. Before this garden could start to grow, About seven years after the rise of the glittering Marina Bay waterfront, Singapore’s the slate had to be wiped clean, quite literally. Singapore’s transformation began cityscape stands at yet another inflection point. Plans for a Greater Southern Waterfront, a with an extensive campaign to educate the public about the evils of littering. The littering Mandai eco-tourism hub, and an ambitious Jewel complex at Changi Airport are afoot, and fines first announced back then have since become a standard joke in the Singapore lexicon public engagement with protecting the unique markers of local heritage is growing everyday. (A Fine City, as the T-shirts for tourists proclaim). But this fundamental belief in the virtues So, one year and counting into Design 2025’s loveable city project, we check in with the of a clean and green city is no laughing matter—the development of Singapore’s vaunted shapers of this city, to find out how they think design can mould a city closer to our hearts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deceptive Allure of Singapore's Urban Planning to Urban Planners in America
    Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy Volume 3 Issue 1 Study Space XI Singapore Article 7 2019 The Deceptive Allure of Singapore's Urban Planning to Urban Planners in America Denis Binder Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/jculp Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Recommended Citation Binder, Denis (2019) "The Deceptive Allure of Singapore's Urban Planning to Urban Planners in America," Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 7, 155-190. Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/jculp/vol3/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Binder: Singapore & Urban Planning THE DECEPTIVE ALLURE OF SINGAPORE’S URBAN PLANNING TO URBAN PLANNERS IN AMERICA Professor Denis Binder* Singapore, as a settlement, is 200 years old this year. Initial visitors to Singapore see a veritable Disneyland:1 perfection, cleanliness,2 everything perfectly in its place. Urban planners marvel at Singapore; it is virtually a planning utopia. Singapore is a vibrant city-state with roughly 5.6 million people on the 278.6 square mile island. 82% of the population reside in public housing—mostly high-rise complexes—and work in high-rise office buildings. Twenty-three self- contained new towns ring Singapore’s coastal core.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Kuan Yew and the Physical Transformation of Singapore in Celebration of His 90Th Birthday
    CENTRE for LiveableCities SINGAPORE LEE KUAN YEW CENTRE CITIES FOR INNOVATIVE Lee Kuan Yew and the Physical Transformation of Singapore in celebration of his 90th birthday 18 September 2013 About the Organisers LEE KUAN YEW CENTRE CITIES FOR INNOVATIVE LEE KUAN YEW CENTRE FOR INNOVATIVE CITIES The Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities (LKY CIC) was officially established in September 2012. It is one of the first research centres in the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) to focus on the integrated use of technology and design to derive solutions for urban planning, design development and management. The Centre’s mission is to become a thought leader on the critical issues of cities and urbanisation, to provide breakthrough urban solutions, and to better understand the necessary accompanying governance and social frameworks. lkycic.sutd.edu.sg CENTRE for LiveableCities SINGAPORE CENTRE FOR LIVEABLE CITIES, SINGAPORE Set up in 2008 by the Ministry of National Development and the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, the Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC) has as its mission “to distil, create and share knowledge on liveable and sustainable cities”. CLC’s work spans three main areas – Research, Capability Development and Promotions. Through these activities, CLC hopes to provide urban leaders and practitioners with the knowledge and support needed to make our cities better. www.clc.gov.sg Cover photo credits: CC by flickr.com/photos/tolomea. CC by flickr.com/photos/yeowatzup. CC by flickr.com/photos/jirka_matousek.
    [Show full text]
  • 52 Weekends Guide
    WEEKENDS EXPERIENCE • TASTE • VISIT YOUR GUIDE TO EVERY WEEKEND IN SINGAPORE / 2020 TRAVELLER ESSENTIALS Planning 02 your trip 03 When you are here 04 Before you leave 05 Jewel Changi KEY EVENTS OF THE YEAR Don’t miss these 06 2020 headliners SHOP 08 Unique retail gems 10 Curated buys Places the 13 locals love CONTENTS WHAT TO EAT, DRINK, SEE & DO 14 Best of the best 16 Halal-friendly dining 18 Sustainable dining 20 Hawker delights 21 Top 10 must do’s CULTURAL LEGEND PRECINCTS Address MRT 24 Chinatown Website Halal 26 Kampong Glam 28 Little India CALENDAR 30 January COVER: HSBC Rain Vortex, Jewel Changi PHOTO: SPH 34 February PUBLISHING AGENT FOCUS PUBLISHING (A subsidiary of Singapore Press Holdings) 38 March EDITORIAL & CREATIVE SENIOR EDITOR 43 April Dora Tay CREATIVE DIRECTOR Tony Law 47 May ART DIRECTOR All events and experiences featured Fish Chan in this guide are correct as of press time in Dec 2019, and may be subject 52 June GENERAL MANAGER to changes. Maureen Ho CONTENTS CLIENT MANAGEMENT 56 July SENIOR EXECUTIVE Neo Pei Shi 60 August PUBLISHING SERVICES ASSISTANT MANAGER Rahmah Aman September All information is correct at time 65 of publication (Dec 2019) and may be subject to change. STB is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of 69 October this publication and shall not be liable for any damage, loss, injury or inconvenience arising from or in connection with the content of this publication. You should verify or seek 73 November clarification from the individual third parties referred to in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 65--Volume-1-Home-Lr.Pdf
    +65: HOME CONTENTS 3 4 Foreword Contributing Authors Benjamin Goh Founders’ Memorial Curatorial Team Joy Ho Karen Ho 6 National Loyalty Week, 1959: First Steps Andrea Kee Towards Singapore’s State Identity Ng Mei Jia Wong Lee Min Nasri Shah Championing Women and the Poor: Pioneer Female Daniel Tham 10 Politician Madam Hoe Puay Choo Wong Hong Suen Adeline Chia Wong Lee Min A 10 —— Contributors Chua Beng Huat Adeline声援扶持妇女和贫困群体 Chia , 政界女先驱何佩珠女士 Hoe Puay Choo 撰写 林俊玉女士华文校对 How Hwee Young 14 Broadcasting Singapore: Shaping a Nation Kenneth Koh Through Radio and Television, 1950s–1970s Brian Teo Andrea Kee 20 Sixties on Air: How Television Made Waves Editorial Karen Ho in Singapore’s History (Commissioning and Content) Natasha Mano Joy Ho Wong Hong Suen 24 Five Years to House a Nation: Achieving the Copyeditor and Interviews Adeline Chia HDB’s Five-Year Plan, 1960–1965 Karen Ho Catalogue Designer FACTORY 30 Singapore Onscreen in the 1960s Published by Founders’ Memorial Nasri Shah 61 Stamford Road Straight Talking: Sociologist and Educator #03-08, Stamford Court, 34 Professor Chua Beng Huat Singapore 178892 Adeline Chia 39 Engendering Inter-Generational Conversations All rights reserved. Views of authors and contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the Through the Student Archivist Project 2020 Publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior Wong Lee Min permission in viewing from the Publisher and copyright owner. Whilst every care is taken to ensure accuracy of the information in this publication, the Publisher accepts no liability for damages by “A Place That Will Stay Within Me”: National Day misinterpretation of information, expressed or implied, within the pages of the journal.
    [Show full text]