DOCSLIB.ORG

Stock Assessment of BSAI Atka Mackerel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stock Assessment of BSAI Atka Mackerel 17. Assessment of the Atka mackerel stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Sandra Lowe, James Ianelli, and Wayne Palsson Executive Summary Relative to the November 2017 SAFE report, the following substantive changes have been made in the assessment of Atka mackerel. Summary of Changes in Assessment Input 1. The 2017 catch estimate was updated, and estimated total catch for 2018 was set equal to the TAC (71,000 t). 2. Estimated 2019 and 2020 catches are 58,900 t and 54,500 t, respectively. 3. The 2017 fishery age composition data were added. 4. The 2018 Aleutian Islands survey biomass estimates were added. 5. The estimated average selectivity for 2013-2017 was used for projections. 6. We assume that approximately 86% of the BSAI-wide ABC is likely to be taken under the revised Steller Sea Lion Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (SSL RPAs) implemented in 2015. This percentage was applied to the 2019 and 2020 maximum permissible ABCs, and those reduced amounts were assumed to be caught in order to estimate the 2019 and 2020 ABCs and OFL values. 7. As in 2017, the sample sizes specified for fishery age composition data were rescaled to have the same means as in the original baseline model (100), but varied relative to the number of hauls for the fishery. The 2017 data were added. 8. The 1986 survey age data were removed. Summary of Changes in the Assessment Methodology There were no changes in the model configuration. Summary of Results 1. The addition of the 2017 fishery age composition information impacted the estimated magnitude of the 2011 year class which decreased 12%, relative to last year’s assessment, and the magnitude of the 2013 year class which increased 12% relative to last year assessment. The 2011 and 2013 year classes are slightly below average and the 2012 year class remains slightly above average. 2. Estimated values of B100% , B40% , B35% are 8% lower relative to last year’s assessment. 3. Projected 2019 female spawning biomass (106,800 t) is 23% lower relative to last year’s estimate of 2018 female spawning biomass, and 15% lower relative to last year’s projection for 2019. 4. Projected 2019 female spawning biomass is below B40% (113,510 t), thereby placing BSAI Atka mackerel in Tier 3b. 5. The current estimate of F40% adj= 0.44 is 16% higher relative to last year’s estimate of F40% due to changes in the fishery selectivity used for projections. 6. The projected 2019 yield at maxFABC = F40%adj = 0.44 is 68,500 t, which is 26% lower relative to last year’s estimate for 2018. 7. The projected 2019 overfishing level at F35% adj = 0.53 is 79,200 t, which is 27% lower than last year’s estimate for 2018. As estimated or As estimated or specified last year for: recommended this year for: Quantity 2018 2019 2019* 2020* M (natural mortality rate) 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Tier 3a 3a 3b 3b Projected total (age 1+) biomass (t) 599,000 600,440 498,320 514,400 Projected Female spawning biomass 139,300 125,600 106,800 102,700 B100% 307,150 307,150 283,780 283,780 B40% 122,860 122,860 113,510 113,510 B35% 107,500 107,500 99,320 99,320 FOFL 0.46 0.46 0.53 0.53 maxFABC 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.44 FABC 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.44 OFL (t) 108,600 97,200 79,200 73,400 maxABC (t) 92,000 84,400 68,500 63,400 ABC (t) 92,000 84,400 68,500 63,400 As determined this year for: As determined this year for: Status 2016 2017 2017 2018 Overfishing No n/a No n/a Overfished n/a No n/a No Approaching overfished n/a No n/a No *Projections are based on estimated total catch of 58,900 t and 54,500 t in place of maximum permissible ABC for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Area apportionment of ABC The apportionments of the 2019 and 2020 recommended ABCs based on the most recent 4-survey weighted average: Survey Year 2019 & 2020 2019 2020 2012 2014 2016 2018 Apportionment ABC ABC 541+SBS 12% 42% 35% 38% 35% 23,970 22,190 542 39% 28% 30% 7% 21% 14,390 13,310 543 48% 30% 35% 55% 44% 30,140 27,900 Weights 8 12 18 27 Total 68,500 63,400 ABC Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments on Assessments in General From the October 2017 SSC minutes: “The SSC recommends that, for those sets of environmental and fisheries observations that support the inference of an impending severe decline in stock biomass, the issue of concern be brought to the SSC, with an integrated analysis of the indices in future stock assessment cycles. To be of greatest value, to the extent possible, this information should be presented at the October Council meeting so that there is sufficient time for the Plan Teams and industry to react to the possible reduction in fishing opportunity.” There were no sets of environmental and fisheries observations that supported an inference of an impending severe decline in BSAI Atka mackerel stock biomass. “The SSC also recommends explicit consideration and documentation of ecosystem and stock assessment status for each stock ... during the December Council meeting to aid in identifying stocks of concern.” Note: This recommendation was clarified in December 2017 and June 18. In these clarifications, the SSC noted that “Implementation of these stock and ecosystem determinations will be an iterative process and will require a dialogue between the stock assessment authors, Plan Teams, ecosystem modelers, ESR editors, and the SSC.” The iterative process described above has not been developed, and no determinations of stock assessment and ecosystem status have been made specific to this recommendation. However, the ecosystem and stock status for BSAI Atka mackerel is documented and discussed at length in the current assessment. Also, a risk matrix table was completed for Atka mackerel that discussed ecosystem/environmental considerations. The conclusion from the risk matrix table was that “While data that could inform our assessment of ecosystem risks relevant to Atka are limited, indicators of Atka zooplankton prey and positive condition indices suggest that foraging conditions for Atka have been stable through the recent warm years, particularly in the Western Aleutians. Taken together. The limited ecosystem information suggest no immediate concerns and warrant a risk score of 1 at present”. From the December 2017 SSC minutes: “The SSC reminds authors of the need to balance the desire to improve model fit with increased risk of model misspecification.” This recommendation was subsequently clarified in the minutes of the June 2018 SSC meeting as follows: “In the absence of strict objective guidelines, the SSC recommends that thorough documentation of model evaluation and the logical basis for changes in model complexity be provided in all cases.” Model evaluation is thoroughly documented in the Model Evaluation section and Appendix 17C. The logical basis for the recent changes in model complexity implemented last year (Model 16.0b), were provided in last year’s stock assessment, presented at the September 2018 BSAI Plan Team meetings, and accepted by the SSC at the 2018 October meeting. “Report a consistent metric (or set of metrics) to describe fish condition among assessments and ecosystem documents where possible. The current BSAI Atka mackerel assessment does not report fish condition. However, a recommendation has been made to adopt the “weight-length residual” method currently used in the ESRs as the standard method. This index of fish condition will be reported in next year’s assessment. “Projections ... clearly illustrate the lack of uncertainty propagation in the ‘proj’ program used by assessment authors. The SSC encourages authors to investigate alternative methods for projection that incorporate uncertainty in model parameters in addition to recruitment deviations. Further, the SSC noted that projections made on the basis of fishing mortality rates (Fs) only will tend to underestimate the uncertainty (and perhaps introduce bias if the population distribution is skewed). Instead, a two-stage approach that first includes a projection using F to find the catch associated with that F and then a second projection using that fixed catch may produce differing results that may warrant consideration.” The BSAI Atka mackerel assessment uses the ‘proj’ program for projections. Modifications of the current standard projection code were not completed in time for the final 2018 stock assessments. From the October SSC 2018 minutes: The SSC did not make any comments on assessments in general that were directed to authors. The general recommendations were for the Plan Teams. From the November 2017 Joint and BSAI Plan Team minutes: The BSAI Plan Team did not make any comments on assessments in general. Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments Specific to the Atka Mackerel Assessment From the December SSC 2017 minutes: “For subsequent assessments, the SSC supports the following Plan Team recommendations: 1. Investigate which parameters (including derived quantities) are changing in the retrospective peels that might contribute the relationship between historical scale and number of peels. 2. Consider dropping the 1986 age composition from the analysis, to be consistent with the policy of not using pre-1991 survey data. 3. Improve documentation for the process of using Francis weights to tune the constraint governing the amount of time variability in fishery selectivity. 4. Continue to investigate fishery selectivity time blocks, with blocks linked to identifiable changes in the fishery. 5. Evaluate the sensitivity of model results to an assumed average sample size of 100 for the fishery age composition data, or better yet (if possible), find a way to tune the sample size and the constraint governing the amount of time variability in fishery selectivity simultaneously.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Sea of Okhotsk, Sakhalin Island): 2. Cyclopteridae−Molidae Families
    ISSN 0032-9452, Journal of Ichthyology, 2018, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 633–661. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2018. An Annotated List of the Marine and Brackish-Water Ichthyofauna of Aniva Bay (Sea of Okhotsk, Sakhalin Island): 2. Cyclopteridae−Molidae Families Yu. V. Dyldina, *, A. M. Orlova, b, c, d, A. Ya. Velikanove, S. S. Makeevf, V. I. Romanova, and L. Hanel’g aTomsk State University (TSU), Tomsk, Russia bRussian Federal Research Institute of Fishery and Oceanography (VNIRO), Moscow, Russia cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences (IPEE), Moscow, Russia d Dagestan State University (DSU), Makhachkala, Russia eSakhalin Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (SakhNIRO), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia fSakhalin Basin Administration for Fisheries and Conservation of Aquatic Biological Resources—Sakhalinrybvod, Aniva, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia gCharles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic *e-mail: [email protected] Received March 1, 2018 Abstract—The second, final part of the work contains a continuation of the annotated list of fish species found in the marine and brackish waters of Aniva Bay (southern part of the Sea of Okhotsk, southern part of Sakhalin Island): 137 species belonging to three orders (Perciformes, Pleuronectiformes, Tetraodon- tiformes), 31 family, and 124 genera. The general characteristics of ichthyofauna and a review of the commer- cial fishery of the bay fish, as well as the final systematic essay, are presented. Keywords: ichthyofauna, annotated list, conservation status, commercial importance, marine and brackish waters, Aniva Bay, southern part of the Sea of Okhotsk, Sakhalin Island DOI: 10.1134/S0032945218050053 INTRODUCTION ANNOTATED LIST OF FISHES OF ANIVA BAY The second part concludes the publication on the 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗
    Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗ I examine the estimated economic, ecological, and food security effects of future fishery management reform in Asia. Without climate change, most Asian fisheries stand to gain substantially from reforms. Optimizing fishery management could increase catch by 24% and profit by 34% over business- as-usual management. These benefits arise from fishing some stocks more conservatively and others more aggressively. Although climate change is expected to reduce carrying capacity in 55% of Asian fisheries, I find that under climate change large benefits from fishery management reform are maintained, though these benefits are heterogeneous. The case for reform remains strong for both catch and profit, though these numbers are slightly lower than in the no-climate change case. These results suggest that, to maximize economic output and food security, Asian fisheries will benefit substantially from the transition to catch shares or other economically rational fishery management institutions, despite the looming effects of climate change. Keywords: Asia, climate change, fisheries, rights-based management JEL codes: Q22, Q28 I. Introduction Global fisheries have diverged sharply over recent decades. High governance, wealthy economies have largely adopted output controls or various forms of catch shares, which has helped fisheries in these economies overcome inefficiencies arising from overfishing (Worm et al. 2009) and capital stuffing (Homans and Wilen 1997), and allowed them to turn the corner toward sustainability (Costello, Gaines, and Lynham 2008) and profitability (Costello et al. 2016). But the world’s largest fishing region, Asia, has instead largely pursued open access and input controls, achieving less long-run fishery management success (World Bank 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries
    JANUARY 2020 Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and FisheriesCrab Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries JANUARY 2020 JANUARY Prepared by: McDowell Group Authors and Contributions: From NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center: Ben Fissel (PI, project oversight, project design, and editor), Brian Garber-Yonts (editor). From McDowell Group, Inc.: Jim Calvin (project oversight and editor), Dan Lesh (lead author/ analyst), Garrett Evridge (author/analyst) , Joe Jacobson (author/analyst), Paul Strickler (author/analyst). From Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission: Bob Ryznar (project oversight and sub-contractor management), Jean Lee (data compilation and analysis) This report was produced and funded by the NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Funding was awarded through a competitive contract to the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and McDowell Group, Inc. The analysis was conducted during the winter of 2018 and spring of 2019, based primarily on 2017 harvest and market data. A final review by staff from NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center was completed in June 2019 and the document was finalized in March 2016. Data throughout the report was compiled in November 2018. Revisions to source data after this time may not be reflect in this report. Typically, revisions to economic fisheries data are not substantial and data presented here accurately reflects the trends in the analyzed markets. For data sourced from NMFS and AKFIN the reader should refer to the Economic Status Report of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska, 2017 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/data/2017-economic-status-groundfish-fisheries-alaska) and Economic Status Report of the BSAI King and Tanner Crab Fisheries Off Alaska, 2018 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Commerce
    Vol. 79 Tuesday, No. 126 July 1, 2014 Part V Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Steller Sea Lion Protection Measures for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska; Proposed Rules VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:44 Jun 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01JYP4.SGM 01JYP4 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS4 37486 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Instructions: Comments sent by any [email protected] or fax to 202– other method, to any other address or 395–5806. National Oceanic and Atmospheric individual, or received after the end of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administration the comment period, may not be Gretchen Harrington, 907–586–7228. considered by NMFS. All comments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 50 CFR Part 679 received are a part of the public record manages groundfish fisheries in the and will generally be posted for public [Docket No. 140304195–4195–01] exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off viewing on www.regulations.gov Alaska under the Fishery Management RIN 0648–BE06 without change. All personal identifying Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea information (e.g., name, address), and Aleutian Islands Management Area Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic confidential business information, or (FMP). The North Pacific Fishery Zone Off Alaska; Steller Sea Lion otherwise sensitive information Management Council (Council) Protection Measures for the Bering submitted voluntarily by the sender will prepared the FMP under the authority of Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish be publicly accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • ATKA MACKEREL Pleurogrammus Monopterygius Also Known As SHIMA HOKKE
    WildALASKA ATKA MACKEREL Pleurogrammus monopterygius also known as SHIMA HOKKE PRODUCTS HARVEST PROFILE SUSTAINABILITY IN ALASKA, protecting the future FROZEN HARVEST SEASON of both the Atka mackerel stocks and JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC THE ENVIRONMENT TAKES PRIORITY Bering Sea / Aleutian Islands over opportunities for commercial H&G ROUND Gulf of Alaska * no directed fishery harvest. The Alaska population of Atka mackerel is estimated from scientific research surveys. Managers use FILLETS ILAB survey data to VA L A E determine the “TOTAL OW LL ED A KIRIMI (BONE-IN HIRAKI AVAILABLE” AND BONELESS) (BUTTERFLY) population, CATCH identify the FAO 61 “ALLOWABLE ” and set Bering Sea / Gulf of Alaska CATCH Aleutian Islands a lower “ACTUAL CATCH” limit to * FAO 61 is also ensure that the wild Atka mackerel harvested population in Alaska's waters will always be sustainable. FAO 67 Atka Mackerel are an FAO 61 and 67: The world’s boundaries of the major fishing areas IMPORTANT FOOD FOR THE established for statistical purposes. endangered PURE ALASKA WESTERN STELLER SEA LION, ECONOMY Atka mackerel jobs | Atka mackerel vessels Source: NOAA a fact managers take 800 25 ATKA MACKEREL are named ~ ~ into consideration when for the island of Atka, the setting the catch limits by spacing out the harvest both largest in the Andreanof Island GEAR TYPE geographically and temporally. group in the Aleutian Chain. to mistake the trawl CERTIFIED AtkaIt can mackerel be easy for the Okhotsk Atka mackerel, the only other The Alaska Atka mackerel fishery species in the Atka mackerel's is certified to an independent certification standard for genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, Phase B – FINAL PROGRAM REPORT
    PHASE B Final Program Report March 2016 Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC Pearson Consulting, LLC Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, Phase B – FINAL PROGRAM REPORT Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment – PHASE B Final Program Report Submitted by: Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC Pearson Consulting, LLC March 2016 2 Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, Phase B – FINAL PROGRAM REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Project Scope ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Transportation Research Board Recommendation ............................................... 5 1.4 Purpose of this Report .......................................................................................... 5 2. Phase A .................................................................................................................. 6 3. Phase B .................................................................................................................. 8 4. TecHnical Tasks and Outcomes ............................................................................... 9 4.1 Task 1-2: Optimal Response System ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 40, Number 2 Fall 2013
    PACIFIC SEABIRDS A Publication of the Pacific Seabird Group Volume 40, Number 2 Fall 2013 PACIFIC SEABIRD GROUP Dedicated to the Study and Conservation of Pacific Seabirds and Their Environment The Pacific Seabird Group (PSG) was formed in 1972 due to the need for better communication among Pacific seabird researchers. PSG provides a forum for the research activities of its members, promotes the conservation of seabirds, and informs members and the public of issues relating to Pacific Ocean seabirds and their environment. PSG members include research scientists, conservation professionals, and members of the public from all parts of the Pacific Ocean. The group also welcomes seabird professionals and enthusiasts in other parts of the world. PSG holds annual meetings at which scientific papers and symposia are presented; abstracts for meetings are published on our web site. The group is active in promoting conservation of seabirds, including seabird/fisheries interactions, monitoring of seabird populations, seabird restoration following oil spills, establishment of seabird sanctuaries, and endangered species. Policy statements are issued on conservation issues of critical importance. PSG’s journals are Pacific Seabirds (formerly the PSG Bulletin) and Marine Ornithology. Other publications include symposium volumes and technical reports; these are listed near the back of this issue. PSG is a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Ornithological Council, and the American Bird Conservancy. Annual dues for membership are $30 (individual and family); $24 (student, undergraduate and graduate); and $900 (Life Membership, payable in five $180 installments). Dues are payable to the Treasurer; see the PSG web site, or the Membership Order Form next to inside back cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing the Eradication of Invasive Species on Islands
    DATA MATTERS Informing the Eradication of Invasive Species on Islands north america and the arctic region DATA MATTERS Informing the Eradication of Invasive Species on Islands north america and the arctic region May 2018 contributors Dena Spatz, Nick Holmes, Heath Packard, Gregg Howald, Chad Hanson, & Island Conservation Staff Report by Island Conservation for the National Invasive Species Council Secretariat Deliverable for contract number d17px00181 Recommended citation: Island Conservation (2018) Data matters: informing the eradication of invasive species on islands: North America and the Arctic region. Contractor’s Report 2018-1. National Invasive Species Council Secretariat, Washington, DC Cover photo credits: Puffin (left): Flickr/RoryCB| Black-legged kittiwake: Josh Keaton, NOAA/NMFS/AKRO/SFD | Murre: Josh Kea- ton, NOAA/NMFS/AKRO/SFD |Shipping vessel: Jamie K. Reaser, NISC | Brown rat: Flickr/Jean-Jacques Boujot Version: May 22, 2018 Executive Summary ntroduced, invasive (harmful) species are a key threat to native species on islands in North America and the Arctic. For many islands in these Iregions, conservation action is possible, including the eradication of invasive vertebrates to stop harmful impacts to, and aid recovery of, threatened native spe- cies and habitats. Effective conservation prioritization and planning for such actions is limited by a lack of island-specific data on native and invasive species, as well as interoperability of existing datasets to make existing data uniformly comparable. To improve the knowledge base for well-informed decision-making, Island Conservation was contracted by the National Invasive Species Council (nisc) Secretariat to help advance the 2016–2018 nisc Management Plan Actions 2.5, 2.6, and 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycled Fish Sculpture (.PDF)
    Recycled Fish Sculpture Name:__________ Fish: are a paraphyletic group of organisms that consist of all gill-bearing aquatic vertebrate animals that lack limbs with digits. At 32,000 species, fish exhibit greater species diversity than any other group of vertebrates. Sculpture: is three-dimensional artwork created by shaping or combining hard materials—typically stone such as marble—or metal, glass, or wood. Softer ("plastic") materials can also be used, such as clay, textiles, plastics, polymers and softer metals. They may be assembled such as by welding or gluing or by firing, molded or cast. Researched Photo Source: Alaskan Rainbow STEP ONE: CHOOSE one fish from the attached Fish Names list. Trout STEP TWO: RESEARCH on-line and complete the attached K/U Fish Research Sheet. STEP THREE: DRAW 3 conceptual sketches with colour pencil crayons of possible visual images that represent your researched fish. STEP FOUR: Once your fish designs are approved by the teacher, DRAW a representational outline of your fish on the 18 x24 and then add VALUE and COLOUR . CONSIDER: Individual shapes and forms for the various parts you will cut out of recycled pop aluminum cans (such as individual scales, gills, fins etc.) STEP FIVE: CUT OUT using scissors the various individual sections of your chosen fish from recycled pop aluminum cans. OVERLAY them on top of your 18 x 24 Representational Outline 18 x 24 Drawing representational drawing to judge the shape and size of each piece. STEP SIX: Once you have cut out all your shapes and forms, GLUE the various pieces together with a glue gun.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations on the Biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger Kanagurta
    Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics Thesis submitted to Cochin University of Science and Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY FACULTY OF MARINE SCIENCES GANGA .U. Reg. No. 2763 DEPARTMENT OF MARINE BIOLOGY, MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY SCHOOL OF MARINE SCIENCES COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY KOCHI – 682 016, INDIA September 2010 DECLARATION I, Ganga. U., do hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics “ is a genuine record of research work carried out by me under the guidance of Prof. (Dr.) C.K. Radhakrishnan, Emeritus Professor, Cochin University of Science and Technology, and no part of the work has previously formed the basis for the award of any Degree, Associateship and Fellowship or any other similar title or recognition of any University or Institution. Ganga.U Kochi – 16 September-2010 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics” to be submitted by Smt. Ganga. U., is an authentic record of research work carried out by her under my guidance and supervision in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Cochin University of Science and Technology, under the faculty of Marine Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Characteristics of Forage Fish Species in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea Based on Kirchhoff-Approximation Models
    1839 Acoustic characteristics of forage fish species in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea based on Kirchhoff-approximation models Stéphane Gauthier and John K. Horne Abstract: Acoustic surveys are routinely used to assess fish abundance. To ensure accurate population estimates, the characteristics of echoes from constituent species must be quantified. Kirchhoff-ray mode (KRM) backscatter models were used to quantify acoustic characteristics of Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska pelagic fish species: capelin (Mallotus villosus), Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius), and eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus). Atka mackerel and eulachon do not have swimbladders. Acous- tic backscatter was estimated as a function of insonifying frequency, fish length, and body orientation relative to the incident wave front. Backscatter intensity and variance estimates were compared to examine the potential to discrimi- nate among species. Based on relative intensity differences, species could be separated in two major groups: fish with gas-filled swimbladders and fish without swimbladders. The effects of length and tilt angle on echo intensity depended on frequency. Variability in target strength (TS) resulting from morphometric differences was high for species without swimbladders. Based on our model predictions, a series of TS to length equations were developed for each species at the common frequencies used by fisheries acousticians. Résumé : Les inventaires acoustiques sont utilisés
    [Show full text]