17. Assessment of the Atka mackerel stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Sandra Lowe, James Ianelli, and Wayne Palsson Executive Summary Relative to the November 2017 SAFE report, the following substantive changes have been made in the assessment of Atka mackerel. Summary of Changes in Assessment Input 1. The 2017 catch estimate was updated, and estimated total catch for 2018 was set equal to the TAC (71,000 t). 2. Estimated 2019 and 2020 catches are 58,900 t and 54,500 t, respectively. 3. The 2017 fishery age composition data were added. 4. The 2018 Aleutian Islands survey biomass estimates were added. 5. The estimated average selectivity for 2013-2017 was used for projections. 6. We assume that approximately 86% of the BSAI-wide ABC is likely to be taken under the revised Steller Sea Lion Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (SSL RPAs) implemented in 2015. This percentage was applied to the 2019 and 2020 maximum permissible ABCs, and those reduced amounts were assumed to be caught in order to estimate the 2019 and 2020 ABCs and OFL values. 7. As in 2017, the sample sizes specified for fishery age composition data were rescaled to have the same means as in the original baseline model (100), but varied relative to the number of hauls for the fishery. The 2017 data were added. 8. The 1986 survey age data were removed. Summary of Changes in the Assessment Methodology There were no changes in the model configuration. Summary of Results 1. The addition of the 2017 fishery age composition information impacted the estimated magnitude of the 2011 year class which decreased 12%, relative to last year’s assessment, and the magnitude of the 2013 year class which increased 12% relative to last year assessment. The 2011 and 2013 year classes are slightly below average and the 2012 year class remains slightly above average. 2. Estimated values of B100% , B40% , B35% are 8% lower relative to last year’s assessment. 3. Projected 2019 female spawning biomass (106,800 t) is 23% lower relative to last year’s estimate of 2018 female spawning biomass, and 15% lower relative to last year’s projection for 2019. 4. Projected 2019 female spawning biomass is below B40% (113,510 t), thereby placing BSAI Atka mackerel in Tier 3b. 5. The current estimate of F40% adj= 0.44 is 16% higher relative to last year’s estimate of F40% due to changes in the fishery selectivity used for projections. 6. The projected 2019 yield at maxFABC = F40%adj = 0.44 is 68,500 t, which is 26% lower relative to last year’s estimate for 2018. 7. The projected 2019 overfishing level at F35% adj = 0.53 is 79,200 t, which is 27% lower than last year’s estimate for 2018. As estimated or As estimated or specified last year for: recommended this year for: Quantity 2018 2019 2019* 2020* M (natural mortality rate) 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Tier 3a 3a 3b 3b Projected total (age 1+) biomass (t) 599,000 600,440 498,320 514,400 Projected Female spawning biomass 139,300 125,600 106,800 102,700 B100% 307,150 307,150 283,780 283,780 B40% 122,860 122,860 113,510 113,510 B35% 107,500 107,500 99,320 99,320 FOFL 0.46 0.46 0.53 0.53 maxFABC 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.44 FABC 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.44 OFL (t) 108,600 97,200 79,200 73,400 maxABC (t) 92,000 84,400 68,500 63,400 ABC (t) 92,000 84,400 68,500 63,400 As determined this year for: As determined this year for: Status 2016 2017 2017 2018 Overfishing No n/a No n/a Overfished n/a No n/a No Approaching overfished n/a No n/a No *Projections are based on estimated total catch of 58,900 t and 54,500 t in place of maximum permissible ABC for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Area apportionment of ABC The apportionments of the 2019 and 2020 recommended ABCs based on the most recent 4-survey weighted average: Survey Year 2019 & 2020 2019 2020 2012 2014 2016 2018 Apportionment ABC ABC 541+SBS 12% 42% 35% 38% 35% 23,970 22,190 542 39% 28% 30% 7% 21% 14,390 13,310 543 48% 30% 35% 55% 44% 30,140 27,900 Weights 8 12 18 27 Total 68,500 63,400 ABC Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments on Assessments in General From the October 2017 SSC minutes: “The SSC recommends that, for those sets of environmental and fisheries observations that support the inference of an impending severe decline in stock biomass, the issue of concern be brought to the SSC, with an integrated analysis of the indices in future stock assessment cycles. To be of greatest value, to the extent possible, this information should be presented at the October Council meeting so that there is sufficient time for the Plan Teams and industry to react to the possible reduction in fishing opportunity.” There were no sets of environmental and fisheries observations that supported an inference of an impending severe decline in BSAI Atka mackerel stock biomass. “The SSC also recommends explicit consideration and documentation of ecosystem and stock assessment status for each stock ... during the December Council meeting to aid in identifying stocks of concern.” Note: This recommendation was clarified in December 2017 and June 18. In these clarifications, the SSC noted that “Implementation of these stock and ecosystem determinations will be an iterative process and will require a dialogue between the stock assessment authors, Plan Teams, ecosystem modelers, ESR editors, and the SSC.” The iterative process described above has not been developed, and no determinations of stock assessment and ecosystem status have been made specific to this recommendation. However, the ecosystem and stock status for BSAI Atka mackerel is documented and discussed at length in the current assessment. Also, a risk matrix table was completed for Atka mackerel that discussed ecosystem/environmental considerations. The conclusion from the risk matrix table was that “While data that could inform our assessment of ecosystem risks relevant to Atka are limited, indicators of Atka zooplankton prey and positive condition indices suggest that foraging conditions for Atka have been stable through the recent warm years, particularly in the Western Aleutians. Taken together. The limited ecosystem information suggest no immediate concerns and warrant a risk score of 1 at present”. From the December 2017 SSC minutes: “The SSC reminds authors of the need to balance the desire to improve model fit with increased risk of model misspecification.” This recommendation was subsequently clarified in the minutes of the June 2018 SSC meeting as follows: “In the absence of strict objective guidelines, the SSC recommends that thorough documentation of model evaluation and the logical basis for changes in model complexity be provided in all cases.” Model evaluation is thoroughly documented in the Model Evaluation section and Appendix 17C. The logical basis for the recent changes in model complexity implemented last year (Model 16.0b), were provided in last year’s stock assessment, presented at the September 2018 BSAI Plan Team meetings, and accepted by the SSC at the 2018 October meeting. “Report a consistent metric (or set of metrics) to describe fish condition among assessments and ecosystem documents where possible. The current BSAI Atka mackerel assessment does not report fish condition. However, a recommendation has been made to adopt the “weight-length residual” method currently used in the ESRs as the standard method. This index of fish condition will be reported in next year’s assessment. “Projections ... clearly illustrate the lack of uncertainty propagation in the ‘proj’ program used by assessment authors. The SSC encourages authors to investigate alternative methods for projection that incorporate uncertainty in model parameters in addition to recruitment deviations. Further, the SSC noted that projections made on the basis of fishing mortality rates (Fs) only will tend to underestimate the uncertainty (and perhaps introduce bias if the population distribution is skewed). Instead, a two-stage approach that first includes a projection using F to find the catch associated with that F and then a second projection using that fixed catch may produce differing results that may warrant consideration.” The BSAI Atka mackerel assessment uses the ‘proj’ program for projections. Modifications of the current standard projection code were not completed in time for the final 2018 stock assessments. From the October SSC 2018 minutes: The SSC did not make any comments on assessments in general that were directed to authors. The general recommendations were for the Plan Teams. From the November 2017 Joint and BSAI Plan Team minutes: The BSAI Plan Team did not make any comments on assessments in general. Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments Specific to the Atka Mackerel Assessment From the December SSC 2017 minutes: “For subsequent assessments, the SSC supports the following Plan Team recommendations: 1. Investigate which parameters (including derived quantities) are changing in the retrospective peels that might contribute the relationship between historical scale and number of peels. 2. Consider dropping the 1986 age composition from the analysis, to be consistent with the policy of not using pre-1991 survey data. 3. Improve documentation for the process of using Francis weights to tune the constraint governing the amount of time variability in fishery selectivity. 4. Continue to investigate fishery selectivity time blocks, with blocks linked to identifiable changes in the fishery. 5. Evaluate the sensitivity of model results to an assumed average sample size of 100 for the fishery age composition data, or better yet (if possible), find a way to tune the sample size and the constraint governing the amount of time variability in fishery selectivity simultaneously.