DOCSLIB.ORG

附属資料-4 Terms of Reference of the External Monitoring Consultant Appendix-4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
附属資料-4 Terms of Reference of the External Monitoring Consultant Appendix-4 パキスタン国 カシム港石炭荷揚げターミナル・鉄道本線間接続に係る計画策定支援【有償勘定技術支援】 ファイナルレポート 附属資料-4 Terms of Reference of the External Monitoring Consultant Appendix-4 Terms of Reference of the External Monitoring Consultant A. Project Background The Government of Pakistan (GoP) is planning to set up a 660 MW ultra-supercritical coal fired power plant at Lakhra to be financed by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and other potential donors. JICA has commissioned the study "Preparatory Survey on Lakhra Coal Fired Thermal Power Plant Construction Project" (the "Lakhra Study") to support the construction of high efficiency, ultra-supercritical, Lakhra Coal Fired Thermal Power Plant (LCPP) of 600 megawatt (MW) net capacity at Lakhra in Jamshoro District of Sindh. The LCPP project plans to import 2 million tons of coal annually at Pakistan International Bulk Terminal (PIBT) located at Port Qasim. The coal will be then transported to LCPP by the existing railway main line of Pakistan Railway (PR). The nearest railway station on the main line is the Bin Qasim Station located about 9 kilometer (km) from Port Qasim. In anticipation of the new imported coal-based power plants being developed in Jamshoro and in Punjab, PR is planning the improvements at Bin Qasim Station and of the spur line between Port Qasim and Bin Qasim Station. However, currently there is no infrastructure to transport coal between coal unloading terminals at PIBT and the Bin Qasim Station. In this regard, JICA has initiated a feasibility study through Nippon Koei Company (or JICA Study Team, JST) for development of coal transportation between PIBT and PR main line (the “Project”). PQA is preparing the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) that will mitigate adverse social impacts due to the project. The RAP will be consistent with the IFC Policy on Resettlement. A RAP Implementing Agency i.e. NGO or Social Consulting Firm will be hired by PQA for thr implementation of the RAP. Figure-1: Location of the Project 1 / 5 Key Objective of External Monitoring Monitoring involves the collection and analysis of data on resettlement activities with the applying accruing information. Monitoring allows project participants to keep track of resettlement activities, to determine whether resettlement objectives are being achieved, and to make whatever changes are necessary to improve resettlement performance. Evaluation is an assessment of resettlement performance and results in light of stated the objectives. Evaluation for purposes of the RAP is proposed to include a participatory component allowing the project participants to comment on their experience of the project. To be successful, monitoring and evaluation begins with clear resettlement design followed by identification and elaboration of appropriate criteria and indicators. Indicators and Means for Verification Indicators form the key elements of any monitoring and evaluation system. Indicators also make possible the comparison of inputs with the completion of outputs and achievement of objectives and goals, thus providing the basis for performance evaluation. Four categories of indicators have been formulated to facilitate monitoring of Progress, Outputs, Effects, Impacts and Compliance in implementing the resettlement. Effect Monitoring This will be used to measure the extent to which the immediate objectives have been achieved and give an idea of the results emanating from implementing the RAP e.g., percentage of APs now accessing better housing or improved livelihoods on account of being successfully resettled. Impact Monitoring This is the process through which, assessment of the overall achievement of the resettlement goal will be made. Specifically, this is the system that will generate data to gauge success towards implementation of this RAP in terms of impact of the resettlement on the APs. The basis for impact monitoring is the baseline social-economic survey data against which the wellbeing of APs will be compared. The External Monitoring Consultant (EMC) will review implementation process as per set policies in the RAP and assess the achievement of resettlement objectives, the changes in living standards and livelihoods, restoration of the economic and social base of the affected people, the effectiveness, impact and sustainability of entitlements, the need for further mitigation measures if any, and to learn strategic lessons for future policy formulation and planning. Scope of Work The scope of work of the EMC will include the following tasks: (1) To review and verify the progress in land acquisition/resettlement implementation of the Project and whether they have been followed as provided in the RAP. (2) Provide a summary of whether involuntary resettlement was implemented (a) in accordance with the RAP, and (b) in accordance with the stated policy. (3) Verify expenditure & adequacy of budget for resettlement activities. (4) Describe any outstanding actions that are required to bring the resettlement activities in line with RAP. Describe further mitigation measures needed to meet the needs of any affected person or families judged and/or perceiving themselves to be worse off as a result of the Project. Provide a timetable and define budget requirements for these supplementary mitigation measures. (5) Describe any lessons learned that might be useful in developing the new national resettlement policy and legal/institutional framework for involuntary resettlement. (6) To Identify, quantify, and qualify the types of conflicts and grievances reported and resolved and assess whether the consultation and participation procedures followed in accordance with the RAP. (7) To identify the strengths and weaknesses of the land acquisition/resettlement objectives and approaches, implementation strategies. (8) Identification of the categories of impacts and evaluation of the quality and timeliness of delivering entitlements (compensation and rehabilitation measures) for each category and how the entitlements were used and their impact and adequacy to meet the specified objectives of the plans. The quality and timeliness of delivering entitlements, and the sufficiency of entitlements as per approved policy. (9) To review the quality and suitability of the relocation sites from the perspective of the both affected and host communities. 2 / 5 (10) Review results of internal monitoring and verify claims through sampling check at the field level to assess whether land acquisition/resettlement objectives have been generally met. Involve the affected people and community groups in assessing the impact of land acquisition for monitoring and evaluation purposes. (11) To monitor and assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the consultative process with affected APs, particularly those vulnerable, including the adequacy and effectiveness of grievance procedures and legal redress available to the affected parties, and dissemination of information about these. B. Methodology and Approach The general approach to be used is to monitor activities and evaluate impacts ensuring participation of all stakeholders especially women and vulnerable groups. Monitoring tools should include both quantitative and qualitative methods. The external monitor should reach out to cover: (1) 100% APs who had property, assets, incomes and activities severely affected by Project works and had to relocate either to resettlement sites or who chose to self-relocate, or whose source of income was severely affected. (2) 10% of persons who had property, assets, incomes and activities marginally affected by project works and did not have to relocate; (3) 10% of those affected by off-site project activities by contractors and sub-contractors including employment, use of land for contractor's camps, pollution, public health etc.; C. Other Stakeholders and their Responsibility 1. PQA: PQA will establish, for the Project, a Project Manegement Unit (PMU) headed by a Project Maneger (PM), at the project office that will be responsible for the overall execution of the Project. The PM will work on deputation from PQA. The project will be overseeing by the PM, PMU. One implementation committee will be formed to provide overall guidelines and cooperation for project implementation and keep liaison with various stakeholders including Donor, different government organizations and other relevant agencies. (1) Acquire, hold, manage and dispose of land and other property to private sector developers, to carry out the planning, engineering, design, construction, marketing, sales and other operations under the regulations of master plan (2) Execute works in connection with the utilization of infrastructure such as supply and discharge of water, electricity, transportation and other services and amenities and generally to do anything necessary or expedient for purposes of such development and for purposes incidental thereto, provided that save as provided in this Act, nothing contained in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the disregard by the Authority of any law for the time being in force. (3) Lead, monitor and evaluate the implementation of the project. 2. External Monitoring Consultant (EMC): The EMC will be engaged to assist PQA during construction and operation stage for implementation of the RAP. The tasks of the EMC are to: (1) Verify results of internal monitoring; (2) Assess whether resettlement objectives have been met; specifically, whether (3) Livelihoods and living standards have been restored or enhanced; (4) Assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESIA of Block VI Lignite Mining Project
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Block VI Lignite Mining Project Volume 2 of 3 (Appendices A to H) Sindh Carbon Energy Limited R3E03TCO April 2013 Hagler Bailly Pakistan Wardell Armstrong International Ltd. ESIA of Block VI Lignite Mining Project Appendix A: SCEL’s Policies A.1 Environmental Policy Statement Oracle Coalfields and its subsidiaries are engaged in mining activities and principally in the development of a surface coal mine in the Sindh Province of Pakistan. We acknowledging that our business has an impact on the environment and we are committed to managing and reducing that impact through the adoption of the following policy, which requires us to: Identify and comply with all legislation, standards and codes of practice, which are relevant to our businesses activities; Continue to improve our environmental performance through effective communication, provision of staff training and adoption of best techniques available; Use energy and fossil fuels efficiently so as to reduce our carbon emissions; Prevent pollution incidents; Reduce the amount of waste generated by our activities, sites and premises and the percentage that is sent to landfill; Conserve water by reducing demand at our sites and premises; Be a respectful neighbor by minimizing the impact that our activities, sites and premises have on local communities; Protect and, where feasible, enhance biodiversity on sites and premises where we hold responsibility or can influence those that do; Seek to influence our clients to adopt, and our designers to provide, solutions that benefit the environment; Promote, as far as is practicable, responsible sourcing and the purchase of materials and services that through their use, sourcing or manufacture have the least harmful effect on the environment; Minimize the need to travel, but where travel is unavoidable use modern and efficient modes of transport; Work with our Supply Chain to help them improve their own environmental performance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated and Annotated List of Indian Lizards (Reptilia: Sauria) Based on a Review of Distribution Records and Checklists of Indian Reptiles
    JoTT REVIEW 2(3): 725-738 An updated and annotated list of Indian lizards (Reptilia: Sauria) based on a review of distribution records and checklists of Indian reptiles P. Dilip Venugopal Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, 4124 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742-4454, USA Email: [email protected] Date of publication (online): 26 March 2010 Abstract: Over the past two decades many checklists of reptiles of India and adjacent Date of publication (print): 26 March 2010 countries have been published. These publications have furthered the growth of ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print) knowledge on systematics, distribution and biogeography of Indian reptiles, and the field Editor: Aaron Bauer of herpetology in India in general. However, the reporting format of most such checklists of Indian reptiles does not provide a basis for direct verification of the information presented. Manuscript details: As a result, mistakes in the inclusion and omission of species have been perpetuated Ms # o2083 and the exact number of reptile species reported from India still remains unclear. A Received 21 October 2008 Final received 31 December 2009 verification of the current listings based on distributional records and review of published Finally accepted 14 February 2010 checklists revealed that 199 species of lizards (Reptilia: Sauria) are currently validly reported on the basis of distributional records within the boundaries of India. Seventeen Citation: Venugopal, P.D. (2010). An updated other lizard species have erroneously been included in earlier checklists of Indian reptiles. and annotated list of Indian lizards (Reptilia: Omissions of species by these checklists have been even more numerous than Souria) based on a review of distribution records and checklists of Indian reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Ketibunder Ecological2008.Pdf
    Disclaimer note This information should be considered accurate as of the date prepared, namely 2007. You acknowledge that this information may change over time and you should not assume that this information is accurate at a later date. WWF-Pakistan and the Royal Netherlands Embassy accept no responsibility for any errors, deviations and omissions in information compiled by independent consultants in this report. Please send comments regarding any errors, inconsistencies, unacknowledged use of source material or any other issue regarding this ecological baseline report as it will help to curate this database. Comments can be submitted to [email protected] Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keti Bunder Table of contents i List of tables vi List of figures viii List of maps and images x List of Acronyms xi List of resource people/consultants xiii Acknowledgement xiv Executive summary xv Chapter 1 Introduction…………………..………………………………… 1 1.1 Introduction to Keti Bunder….……………………………… 2 1.1.1 State of natural resources…………………………………….. 4 1.1.2 Livelihood and social aspects…………………………………. 5 1.2 Rationale and Objectives…………………………………… 6 1.2.1 Large Mammals Survey……………………………………….. 6 1.2.1.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 6 1.2.1.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………… 7 1.2.2 Small mammal survey…………………………………………. 7 1.2.2.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 7 1.2.2.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………... 9 1.2.3 Reptiles and amphibians survey……………………………… 10 1.2.3.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 10 1.2.3.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………... 10 1.2.4 Birds survey…………………………………………………….. 11 1.2.4.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 11 1.2.4.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………… 11 1.2.5 Marine Fisheries…………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites in Pet Reptiles Rataj Et Al
    Parasites in pet reptiles Rataj et al. Rataj et al. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2011, 53:33 http://www.actavetscand.com/content/53/1/33 (30 May 2011) Rataj et al. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2011, 53:33 http://www.actavetscand.com/content/53/1/33 ORIGINALARTICLE Open Access Parasites in pet reptiles Aleksandra Vergles Rataj1†, Renata Lindtner-Knific2†, Ksenija Vlahović3†, Urška Mavri4† and Alenka Dovč2*† Abstract Exotic reptiles originating from the wild can be carriers of many different pathogens and some of them can infect humans. Reptiles imported into Slovenia from 2000 to 2005, specimens of native species taken from the wild and captive bred species were investigated. A total of 949 reptiles (55 snakes, 331 lizards and 563 turtles), belonging to 68 different species, were examined for the presence of endoparasites and ectoparasites. Twelve different groups (Nematoda (5), Trematoda (1), Acanthocephala (1), Pentastomida (1) and Protozoa (4)) of endoparasites were determined in 26 (47.3%) of 55 examined snakes. In snakes two different species of ectoparasites were also found. Among the tested lizards eighteen different groups (Nematoda (8), Cestoda (1), Trematoda (1), Acanthocephala (1), Pentastomida (1) and Protozoa (6)) of endoparasites in 252 (76.1%) of 331 examined animals were found. One Trombiculid ectoparasite was determined. In 563 of examined turtles eight different groups (Nematoda (4), Cestoda (1), Trematoda (1) and Protozoa (2)) of endoparasites were determined in 498 (88.5%) animals. In examined turtles three different species of ectoparasites were seen. The established prevalence of various parasites in reptiles used as pet animals indicates the need for examination on specific pathogens prior to introduction to owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Herpetofauna of Jaisalmer District- Some Photographic Records
    REPTILE RAP #17, 27 July 2015 Contributions to Herpetofauna of Jaisalmer District- some photographic records Ridhima Solanki 1, Anant Pande 2, Anirudhkumar Vasava 3, Aarti Singh 4 & C.M. Bipin 5 1 Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology Department, Wildlife Institute of India, P.O.18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001 1 [email protected] In conservation planning, inventories of a of reptiles made during the months of July-August region’s species have provided essential data 2011 from Shahgarh area of Jaisalmer District, (Oliver & Beattie 1993, Chapman 2005) although Rajasthan. As a non-protected area within the the diverse habitats and ecological zones of India Great Indian Thar Desert, Shahgarh has gained remain poorly inventoried and the information is significance as one of the proposed site for the scarce for conservation actions (Das, I. 2002).The Cheetah reintroduction (Jhala et al. 2010). database for the reptile records are inchoate for non-protected areas in India. Study Area The reptile fauna of India has significant works The southern Shahgarh Grasslands (27° 18’ to by Smith (1931, 1935, 1943). In Rajasthan region, 26° 47’ N & 69° 37’ to 69° 29’ E) cover an area of Blanford’s work (1879) in Ajmer area and Murray’s over 4000km2 and are located in Jaisalmer District work (1884) from Sind area and Boulenger’s work of western Rajasthan (Ranjitsinh & Jhala, 2010). (1882) are significant. Minton’s work on reptiles of These grasslands lie in the Desert-Thar (zone Pakistan and Thar (1966), Krishna & Dave (1959, 3A) Bio-Geographic zone of India (Rodgers et al. 1960) & Krishna (1975) work is from Jodhpur region and Singh’s work (1960) from Pilani are some of the major contributions to herpetofaunal studies.
    [Show full text]
  • REPTILES of PAKISTAN No
    REPTILES OF PAKISTAN No. Common name Scientific name Conservation Status1 Distribution in Pakistan Pond and River Turtles 1. Spotted Mud Turtle Geoclemys hamiltonii Vulnerable 2. Crowned River Turtle Hardella thurjii Vulnerable 3. Brown River turtle Kachuga smithii Low risk 4. Sawback Turtle Kachuga tecta tecta Not evaluated Tortoise 5 Afghan Tortoise Testudo horsfieldii Vulnerable 6 Sindh Star Tortoise Geochelone elegans Not evaluated Marine Turtle 7. Green turtle Chelonia mydas japonica Endangered 8 Hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricate bissa Critically endangered 9 Olive Ridley turtle Lepidochelys olivacea olivacea Endangered 10 Loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta gigas Endangered 11 Leatherback Dermochelys coriascea Critically endangered Softshell Turtles 12 Narrow-headed Softshell Chitra indica Endangered 13 Indian Soft-shell Aspideretes gangeticus Vulnerable 14 Peacock softshell Aspideretes hurum Vulnerable 15 Indian Flapshell Lissemys punctata andersoni Not evaluated Crocodile 16 Mugger Crocodylus palustris palustris Vulnerable Eyelid and lidless Geckos 17 Nikolsky Spider Gecko Cyrtopodium agomuroides Not evaluated 18 Sharp-tailed Spider Gecko Rhinogecko femoralis Not evaluated 19. Blunt-tailed Spider gecko Agamura persica Not evaluated 1 Conservation status is mentioned according to the Red List of IUCN, any species not mentioned in the red list is assumed as not evaluated. No. Common name Scientific name Conservation Status1 Distribution in Pakistan 20. Baloch Rock Gecko Alsophylax tuberculatus Not evaluated 21. Fat-tailed Gecko Eublepharis macularis Not evaluated 22. Swat Stone Gecko Cyrtodactylus walli Not evaluated 23. Warty Rock Gecko Cyrtodactylus kachhensis Not evaluated kachhensis 24. Quetta Rock Gecko Cyrtodactylus kachhensis Not evaluated watsoni 25. Ingoldby’s Stone Gecko Cyrtodactylus kachhensis Not evaluated ingoldbyi 26. Salt Range Rock Gecko Cyrtodactylus montiumsalsorum Not evaluated 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Thar Coalfield Block VI 2X330mw Coal-Fired Power Plant Volume III - Technical Appendices
    Thar Coalfield Block VI 2x330MW Coal-fired Power Plant Volume III - Technical Appendices March 2017 Oracle Coalfields PLC Mott MacDonald Victory House Trafalgar Place Brighton BN1 4FY United Kingdom T +44 (0)1273 365000 F +44 (0)1273 365100 mottmac.com Oracle Coalfields PLC 6th Floor Two Kingdom Street Thar Coalfield Block VI London 366982 01 A W2 6BD 2x330MW Coal-fired Power Mott MacDonald Plant Volume III - Technical Appendices March 2017 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, Oracle Coalfields PLC United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Thar Coalfield Block VI 2x330MW Coal-fired Power Plant Volume III - Technical Appendices Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A March 2017 Various Appendices to support ESIA Document reference: 366982 | 01 | A Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This report has been pr epared sol el y for use by the party which commissi oned it (the ‘Client’) i n connecti on with the capti oned proj ect.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of the Herpetofauna of Cholistan Desert, Pakistan
    Russian Journal of Herpetology Vol. 15, No. 3, 2008, pp. 193 – 205 BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGY OF THE HERPETOFAUNA OF CHOLISTAN DESERT, PAKISTAN Khalid Javed Baig,1 Rafaqat Masroor,1 and Mohammad Arshad2 Submitted December 28, 2006. Present studies are aimed to document the herpetofauna of Cholistan Desert and study its ecology. During the last three years from 2001 to 2003, attempts have been made to collect and observe the amphibians and reptiles in different parts of Cholistan Desert. More than four thousand specimens belonging to 44 species have so far been collected/observed from the study area. Among different collecting techniques adopted for these studies, “Pit-fall” traps and “Hand Picking” showed best results. The voucher specimens have been catalogued and are presently lying with Pakistan Museum of Natural History, Islamabad. Keywords: Amphibians, Reptiles, ecology, Cholistan Desert, Pakistan. INTRODUCTION either saline or saline-sodic, with pH ranging from 8.2 to 8.4 and from 8.8 to 9.6, respectively. The Greater Choli- Lying on the eastern side of the Indus River and stan is a wind resorted sandy desert and comprised of southern and southeastern side of Sutlej River, Cholistan river terraces, large sand dunes, ridges and depressions Desert is the northwestern limit of Thar Desert or Great (Baig et al., 1980; Khan, 1987; Arshad and Rao, 1994). Indian Desert. This is a plain of gently undulating sand The dunes reach an average height of about 100 m (Ar- hills. Elevations are generally below 150 m. Archeologi- shad and Rao, 1994; Akbar et al., 1996). cal evidence shows that the region was better watered as Most of the herpetological studies carried out in Pa- recently, through the flow of historic Hakra River.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Vertebrate Diversity at Lal Suhanra National Park, Pakistan
    Khan et al., The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 28(6): 2018, Page:The J.1725 Anim.-1734 Plant Sci. 28(6):2018 ISSN: 1018-7081 STUDY OF VERTEBRATE DIVERSITY AT LAL SUHANRA NATIONAL PARK, PAKISTAN B. N. Khan1, R. Ahmad1*, Z. Ali2, R. Yasmeen3, M. Azhar4, F. Abid1, S. Mehmood1 and H. Raza1 1Centre for the Undergraduate Studies, 2Zoology Department, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan 3Lahore Garrison University for Women, Lahore, Pakistan; 4Safari Zoo Lahore *Corresponding author email: [email protected] , [email protected] ABSTRACT The field surveys of Lal Suhanra National Park (LSNP) Bahawalpur were conducted to study its vertebrate diversity between October and December 2015. The study was commenced to determine the status of fauna of national park, diversity indices and environmental intimidations to their protection. The data was collected by point count method. The fauna observed there included 17 species of mammals including Asiatic wolf that is endangered. Five species of amphibians and 27 species of reptiles were found there. Among reptiles, Chitra indica is endangered. The results of study showed that maximum account of 7443 birds of 74 species belong to 35 families and representative of 16 orders were witnessed during the study. The seasonal distribution pattern of birds shown that year around resident were 76%, 7% were summer breeders, 4% were passage migrants while 5% were uncommon and 8% were common winter migrants. Hunting, deforestation, wood logging, disturbance by human activities and habitat loss are the major threats for wild animals at LSNP. Alteration in natural lake and their flows for recreational purposes is also a major threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Key and Checklist to the Lizards of Pakistan (Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria)
    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 15 (3/4): 99 - 119 99 Wien, 30. Dezember 2002 Key and checklist to the lizards of Pakistan (Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria) Schlüssel und Checklist der Eidechsen von Pakistan (Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria) MUHAMMAD SHARJF KHAN KURZFASSUNG In den vergangenen Jahren wurden der Liste der Eidechsen Pakistans verschiedene Taxa hinzugefügt, wobei die zugrundeliegenden Beschreibungen und Neunachweise weit über die herpetologische Literatur verstreut sind. Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt diese Informationen zusammen und liefert eine umfangreiche Bibliographie neuerer Publikationen über die Eidechsen von Pakistan. ABSTRACT During recent years several lizard taxa were added to the faunal list of Pakistan. Descriptions and new records are scattered in different publications in the herpetological literature. The present paper puts the informa- tion together, and provides a comprehensive list of recent publications on the lizards of Pakistan. KEY WORDS Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria; keys and checklist, lizards, Pakistan INTRODUCTION Our knowledge ofsauria of the Indian 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1991a,b,c, subcontinent stems from GÜNTHER (1864), 1992, 1993a,b, 1997, 1999a,b, 2000a,b, "The Reptiles of British India", and, subse- 2001); BORNER (1974, 1976, 1981); KHAN, quently, BOULENGER'S (1890) volume in the M. & MIRZA (1977); GOLUBEV & SZCZER- "Fauna of British India" series. The saurian BAK (1981); KHAN, M. & AHMED (1987); part of it was later updated in an independ- KHAN, M. & BAIG (1988, 1992); BAIG ent volume in the series by SMITH (1935). (1988, 1989, 1990, 1998); KHAN, M. & TAS- After partition of the subcontinent, MINTON NIM (1990); SZCZERBAK (1991); AUFFEN- (1962, 1966) ushered in the modern era of BERG & REHMAN (1995); BAIG & BÖHME the herpetological studies in Pakistan, fol- (1996); KHAN, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Stolen Wildlife II Why the EU Still Needs to Tackle Smuggling of Nationally Protected Species
    STOLEN WILDLIFE II WHY THE EU STILL NEEDS TO TACKLE SMUGGLING OF NATIONALLY PROTECTED SPECIES 4 • STOLEN WILDLIFE II - WHY THE EU STILL NEEDS TO TACKLE SMUGGLING OF NATIONALLY PROTECTED SPECIES A SUMMARY 6 B CASE STUDIES 7 MEXICO (UPDATE) 8 COSTA RICA 10 BRAZIL 12 TURKEY 14 IRAN 16 OMAN 18 PHILIPPINES 20 PAKISTAN 22 INDIA 24 AUSTRALIA (UPDATE) 26 RECOGNITION FOR THE NEED OF C AN EU LACEY ACT 28 CONCLUSIONS & D RECOMMENDATIONS 30 E REFERENCES 32 STOLEN WILDLIFE II - WHY THE EU STILL NEEDS TO TACKLE SMUGGLING OF NATIONALLY PROTECTED SPECIES• 5 LIST OF FIGURES, PHOTOS, AND TABLES FIGURES 1: Examples for high market prices and illegally taken animals 7 2: Protected species from Mexico in international commercial hobbyist trade 9 3: Protected species from Costa Rica in international commercial hobbyist trade 11 4: Protected species from Brazil in international commercial hobbyist trade 12 5: Protected species from Turkey in international commercial hobbyist trade 15 6: Protected species from Iran in international commercial hobbyist trade 17 7: Protected species from Oman in international commercial hobbyist trade 19 8: Protected species from the Philippines in international commercial hobbyist trade 21 9: Protected species from Pakistan in international commercial hobbyist trade 23 10: Protected species from India in international commercial hobbyist trade 25 11: Protected species from Australia in international commercial hobbyist trade 27 PHOTOS 1: Smuggling case Costa Rica, Headline of The Tico Times, Sep 20, 2014 10 2: Neurergus microspilatus,
    [Show full text]