Alexandria at the Beginning of the Fifth Century: St. Cyril and His Opponents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Alexandria at the Beginning of the Fifth Century: St. Cyril and His Opponents CIPRIAN IULIAN TOROCZKAI University “Lucian Blaga” of Sibiu, Faculty of Orthodox Theology “Sf. Andrei Şaguna” Introduction In 2009 was launched on the market a controversial film: Agora. It exposes the life of the last director of the legendary library of Alexandria, Theon; it is Hypatia, an astronomer, mathematician and philosopher who lived in the fourth century AC. Although, over time, her scientific works have been lost, her image remained in history as a strong woman, both philosopher and scientist with significant reputation in her time, founder of a school which had many disciples. Based on fictionalized story of love with a slave Davus and a relationship with another student of hers, Orestes, also in love with her, Hypatia is presented as a symbol of tolerance in her hometown. One of the co-producers of the film, Mateo Gil says she embodied two interesting symbols: “On the one hand, the Greek mentality, in search of truth in a world where religion held great power in human life, and, on the other hand, a woman who wanted to lead her own life in a man’s world, showing the same freedom to dedicate herself to the study of philosophy as her father (this spiritual freedom was transposed also on a physical plan: it is known that Hypatia remained a virgin all her life)”. What strikes at a more careful analysis of the film is, beyond the extraordinary destiny of Hypatia, the socio-historical context in which she lived: Alexandria in the second half of the fourth century, a time when the Roman Empire falls into decadence – and with it the Greco-Roman philosophical mentality – and a new order is established, the Christian world. The image that the producers of the film want to emphasize is the inevitable conflict between the end of the ancient world and early medieval times. By the film director’s own confession, Alejandro Amenabar, in the style of a CNN documentary about the fourth century, the film wanted to give the audience a sense of urgency, breaking news. What is not stated directly by the director, but is the impression given to any viewer of the film, is the superiority of wisdom of the Old World in dealing with Christianity. Thus, Hypatia is the symbol of the genius scientist, tolerant, reaching the inevitable conflict – and ultimately even loses her life – with the new religion that is spreading increasingly more. From a persecuted religion, Christianity becomes dominant in Alexandria. After watching the 124 film, the viewer is left on the retina with the image of a grim, intolerant and aggressive Christianity. The parabalani led by bishops Theophilus and Cyril are portrayed as a unleashed horde, thirsty of the blood of true thinkers. Regarding the image of the two bishops, although the director does not insist very much on them, they appear as evil characters, actors from the shadows who know how to manipulate the masses of Christians blinded with rage. For any connoisseur of Church doctrine, the image of the two bishops, and especially that of St. Cyril of Alexandria, as they appear illustrated in the film, can only cause disappointment. In the introduction he makes for the translation into Romanian of a work of St. Cyril, father Dumitru Stăniloae presents him as a prolific patristic author who “prevails as the leading defender of the true Christian faith against the heresy of Nestorius”.1 Actually, for everything that he did in word and deed in defense of authentic teaching of the Church, the Church ranked Bishop Cyril of Alexandria among the saints, the veneration taking place on June 9. Some modern scholars, in the presentation they make to St. Cyril of Alexandria, adopt a method much closer to the producers’ of the film mentioned above, not the Church’s position. Appears, therefore, a crucial question: Who was the Bishop Cyril of Alexandria? To this question we will try to answer in this study. It is a difficult undertaking, for which we will use the historical data contained in the teachings of authors who lived during or shortly after the fifth century. More important, our reflections are premised on the idea that the image and work of St. Cyril may be presented at their real size only taking into account the socio-historical and political context that characterized Alexandria in the second half of the fourth century and the beginning of the fifth century, and the effervescent cultural and religious environment of the time. Alexandria, Its Geographical and Cultural Importance The city of Alexandria bears the name of its founder, Alexander the Great. Its importance increases during the Ptolemaic dynasty, due to an intertwining of geographical, historical, cultural and religious factors unique compared to other ancient cities from the Mediterranean. Located on the coast of Egypt, Alexandria could benefit from the construction of a major port. The number of inhabitants has grown increasingly more due to the moderate Mediterranean climate: during the summer, the population almost 1 ST. CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA, Scrieri partea întâia: Închinarea şi slujirea în duh şi adevăr (Works. First Part – Worship and Service in Spirit and Truth), (PSB 38), translation, introduction and notes by Dumitru Stăniloae, Publishing House of the Bible and Mission Institute of the Romanian Orthodox Church, Bucharest, 1991, p. 7. 125 doubled because many Egyptians preferred to take refuge here than in the Saharan high temperatures from Cairo and from the remote areas of the south. Alexandria was able to grow also because it was at a point of intersection of two continents. Moreover, it was located in a fertile area due to the connections with the Nile – a network of channels allowed even surfing the Nile directly to Alexandria. Another lake in the vicinity, Mareotis, allowed sufficient water supply. The connection between the topography of Alexandria and the socio- economic structures is otherwise attested even by the legend of the founding of the city by Alexander the Great in 331 BC. According to this legend, the architects of Alexander were out of chalk while drawing the limits of the future city. Instead of chalk, they used barley flour to complete the outline. But a flock of birds came down from heaven and began to eat the flour, which made Alexander the Great believe that was a bad sign. His men assured him that, on the contrary, it was a good sign – the city would be a center of abundance that would feed many nations.2 Beyond this legend, it should be noted that Alexandria, unlike other ancient cities like Athens or Rome, which have developed and expanded over the centuries, was a “planned” city.3 The architectural plan of Alexandria represents the expression of the harbor function owned by the city. The maritime trade was continued by surfing the channels of the Nile mentioned previously. Clearly, this intense harbor life inevitably lead to a diverse population in terms of ethnicity. We find here a strong Hebrew community and a larger pagan community. As for the Christian community, its development is related to the Catechetical School of Alexandria. The most important information on the pre-institutional beginnings of Alexandrian school are provided to us by Eusebius of Caesarea and Philip from Sidon. The latter, in his Christian History says that the first leader had been Athenagoras, followed by Clement, the author of Stromata, and then by Pantem. The most famous teacher was Origen, through whom was made the migration to the institutional stage in the development of the catechetical 4 school. 2 CHRISTOPHER HAAS, Late Antiquity: Topography and Social Conflict, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1997, p. 22. Through the information provided, the reading of this work was decisive in writing the present study. However, our findings differ essentially from the end of the book. 3 IBIDEM, p. 24. 4 See the study of VLAD NICULESCU, Origen şi tradiţia şcolii catehetice din Alexandria (Origen and the Tradition of the Catechetical School of Alexandria), in “Altarul Banatului” (Shrine of Banat), 9 (1998), no. 1-3, p. 8-30. 126 At the end of the fourth century and early fifth century, the tradition of the catechetical school of Alexandria ended. Probably the last name of its leader, Rhodon is just an invention of Philip (he was interested to present himself as a direct successor of the Alexandrian tradition; he wrote in the fifth century).5 Alexandria in the Time of St. Cyril From the first part of the life of St. Cyril we do not have too much data. We know only that he was born into a prominent family, that he lived for a time as a monk in the desert and accompanied his uncle Theophilus, Patriarch of Alexandria, at the Council of Constantinople that removed St. John Chrysostom from the patriarchal see (403). On October 17, 412, two days after the death of his uncle Theophilus, he was elected Patriarch of Alexandria. Theophilus led the church of Alexandria between 385 and 412, a period of relative peace. The only notable incident happened with the “Long brothers”, Origenist monks – in fact, as demonstrated by Alexander Golitzin on the footsteps of Georges Florovsky, “anthropomorphites”6 – and with John Chrysostom. However, the episcopate of Theophilus of Alexandria had brought peace at a social level; He initiated several architectural projects that that had him respected by the lower social class However, the episcopate of Theophilus of Alexandria had brought peace at a social level; he initiated several architectural projects that that had him respected by the lower social class. The situation began to change only a very short time before the death of Theophilus, being related to violent incidents around establishing his successor on the episcopal see.