Wyethia with Desirable Forage Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wyethia with Desirable Forage Species Replacing Wyethia with Desirable Forage Species WALTER F. MUEGGLER AND JAMES P. RLAISDELL Range Conservationists, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, CJ. S. Forest Service, Ogden, Utah ENSE stands of wyethia (Wyethia DRY CREEK STUDY D amplexicaulis and W. helianthoides) Methods now occur on extensive areas of western mountain range lands (Fig. 1A). These A 14-acre area on Dry Creek, approxi- plants prefer moist, heavy soils, and mately 6,500 feet in elevation and sloping consequently are found on some of the gently to the southeast, was selected in most productive sites. An air-dry herbage 1947. The annual precipitation is prob- production of more than 1.5 tons per ably between 20 and 25 inches, and the acre is possible on many of these sites, soil is a heavy, black loam. Prior to but when most of this is made up of the treatment, the area supported a dense relat)ively unpalatable wyethia, there is stand of wyethia (mostly W. amplexi- only a small amount of usable forage. caulis but some W. helianthoides) with a Such stands of wyethia may be native small amount of geranium (Geranium on some areas, but on many others it is viscosissimum), cinquefoil (Potentilla sp.), thought that wyethia has increased as dock (Rumex sp.), mountain brome more palatable plants have been reduced (Bromus carinatus), slender wheatgrass by heavy grazing. Wyethia appears to be (Agropyron trachycaulum), bluegrasses long lived and a strong competitor, so (Poa spp.), oniongrass (Mel&a sp.), and that its elimination by nattiral means, if several other grasses and forbs. possible at all, is slow. In order to deter- Five methods of cultivation were used mine what methods might be successful on duplicated l-acre plots in September, in converting dense stands of wyethia to 1947: moldboard plowing to 10 inches, more desirable plants quickly, studies wheatland plowing to 3 and 6 inches, were begun in 1947 on the Spencer Dis- and offset (2-way) disking to 3 and 5 trict of the Targhee National Forest in inches. Two plots were reserved as un- eastern Idaho. treated checks. The authors wish to acknowledge the In June, 1948 one plot was plowed with assistance of Lyman Richwine, District a moldboard plow to a depth of 6 inches. Forest Ranger, in establishing and main- In addition, one uncultivated plot was taining these studies, and the work of divided into 10 sections, and four chemi- C. E. Holscher, now with the Pacific cals were applied with a hand sprayer to Northwest Forest and Range Experiment duplicated 0. l-acre sections. Ammonium Station, who planned the Dry Creek sulfamate was applied at the rate of study. They also wish to thank George 25 pounds per acre, ammonium 2,4-di- Whornham of the American Chemical chlorophenoxyacetate at 3 pounds per Paint Company for furnishing the chemi- acre, a mixture of diesel oil and creosote cals used in the West Camas Creek at 45 gallons per acre, and kerosene at study and for his advice in the selection 45 gallons per acre. The two remaining of these chemicals. sections were left as untreated checks. 144 WALTER F. MUEGGLER AND JAMES P. BLAISDELL Plots cultivated in the fall of 1947, as 1). In 1948 it appeared that plowing in well as the untreated check plots, were the spring was considerably more effec- broadcast to a mixture of smooth brome tive than in the fall, but these initial (Rromus inermis) , slender wheatgrass, differences had mostly disappeared by timothy (Phleum pratense), and orchard- 1950. Although there was only a slight, grass (Dactylis glomerata) at the rate of difference in favor of spring plowing in 10 pounds per acre immediately after 1950, cultivation at t)his season may actu- cultivation. The spring-plowed plot and ally be more effective as these results t’he chemically treated sections were were accomplished by plowing at’ a 6-inch drilled to the same mixture in the fall of depth, whereas the fall plowing was at 10 1948. inches. Disking with a wheatland plow TABLE 1 E$ects of cultural and chemical treatments on numbers of wyethia and air-dry production of wyethia and grass, Dry Creek HERBAGE PRODUCTION WYETHIA PLANTS PER (Percent of check) SUBPLOT (Percefit of check) TREATMENT AND SEASON Wyethia Grass -/- I-1948 1949 1950 1949 1950 Yawing: Sprir& moldhoard, g-inch depth. 17 25 24 19 18 75 53 Fall moldboard, lo-inch depth.. 44 39 26 20 23 749 1365 Fall wheatland, 6-inch depth. 102 107 175 128 126 62 66 Fall wheatland, 3-inch depth.. 122 111 156 113 110 73 80 Fall offset disk, 5-inch depth.. 92 85 109 101 80 93 100 Fall offset disk, 3-inch depth. .. 125 114 161 124 122 82 104 -~--------~~ --- --- --- --- _--- --- Untreated check (number and Ibs. per acre). 47 46 44 2069 1376 186 167 _~___--_-_-~~ -- -__ --- --- _---- --- Chetiical treatment: 2,4-D’................... - 58 36 22 31 171 326 Kerosene................. - 87 98 79 107 92 74 Creosote and diesel oil. - 87 93 85 95 63 86 Ammonium sulfamate. - 83 101 77 96 130 162 --- --- __- --- -__ _-__- Untreated check (number and lbs. per acre). - 56 58 3080 1612 100 l Ammonium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate. Wyethia plants were counted on cir- and an offset disk was not effective at cular 4%square-foot subplots within each either depth. As a matter of fact, wheat- acre plot during late summer of 1948, land plowing at both depths and shallow 1949, and 1950. Weight estimates were offset disking resulted in a substantial made of both wyethia and reseeded increase in plant numbers and a similar, grasses in 1949 and 1950. though less pronounced, increase in wyethia herbage. Apparently the disks Results cut the taproot so shallowly that in Moldboard plowing was the only many cases both sections of root con- method of cultivation which caused an tinued to grow, producing two plant)s appreciable reduction in wyethia (Table instead of one. The inadequacy of offset disking wits further subntantint~d hy hers were essentially the same as on the poor results obtained from disking a untreated checkrj. 5-acre area on West Camas Creek in the Of t,he grasses broadcast in the fall of spring of 1949. 1947, s successful stand was obt,ained A critical examination of data in Table only on t,he fall moldboard-plowed plots, 1 shovs certain variations h&wren years ix., only &here wyethis had hren greatly for \vhivh no explanation is readily ap- reduced. Grass production on these plots parent. It, is thought that these minor WRS over seven times that of t,he un- variations arc attrihutahle to sampling treated plots in I919 and over thirteen error resulting from use of different times, in 1950. Total grass production sample subplots rach yciu. \~as decreased on all other plots, but Wyethia herbage production ras those treated rith the offset disk had greatly reduced the year following treat- reoovered sufficiently to pro&we as ment with 2,4-D (Table l), and numbers much as the untreated plots by 1950. of plants continued to decrease the second Three years after fall moldboard ploving year after spraying. Both herbsge pro- and reseeding, grass production was over duction of wyethia and numbers of plants 1 ton of air-dry herhage per acre, whereas were slightly decreased by the other wyethia was producing less than 14 per- chemical treatments, but these decreases cent of this amount. This relatively small were only temporary, for in 1950 both amount of wyethia grew in roes at the wyethia herbage yield and plant num- edges of furrows where roots were not 146 WALTER F. MUEGGLER AND JAMES P. BLAISDELL completely sheared and turned. In con- sp.), dock, geranium, cinquefoil, dan- trast to this, other fall cultivated plots delion (Taraxacum oficinale), yarrow were producing between 1,000 and 2,000 (Achilles lanulosa) , yampa (Perideridia pounds of wyethia and less than 200 gairdneri) , and others. pounds of grass. These differences are Effectiveness of three herbicides for well illustrated in Figure 1B. wyethia eradication were tested at two Although a good kill of wyethia was rates of application at two dates (growth obtained on the spring moldboard-plowed stages). In order that regular field meth- area, the establishment of grass was un- ods of spraying could be employed, 0.5- successful. This grass failure was prob- acre plots, each 1 by 5 chains, were used. ably not related to season of plowing but All treatments were duplicated and perhaps to less favorable weather follow- there were four untreated check plots. ing the 1948 planting or too deep seed Treatments were assigned at random to covering through drilling. the plots within each replication. Grass production was greatly increased Commercial formulations were used on the sections treated with 2,4-D, and throughout. These consisted of a 2,4-D to a lesser extent, on those treated with ethyl ester, a 2,4,5-T butoxy ethanol ammonium sulfamate. This increase, in ester, and a mixture of two parts 2,4-D contrast to that on the fall moldboard- and one part 2,4,5-T in butoxy ethanol plowed plots, was mostly due to an in- ester form. Rates of application were 1 crease in natjive grasses, rather than to and 2 pounds acid equivalent per acre, establishment of reseeded species. Ap- and application was made at two growth parently the hard, uncultivated ground stages, when the wyethia was about was such a poor seedbed that reseeded half way through blooming (June 7) and grasses were unable to become established when blooming was over (June 20, 1949).
Recommended publications
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS in the 1830S
    SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds James Lightner San Diego Flora San Diego, California 2013 SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s Preface The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and Our knowledge of the natural environment of the San Diego region H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds in the first half of the 19th century is understandably vague. Referenc- es in historical sources are limited and anecdotal. As prosperity peaked Copyright © 2013 James Lightner around 1830, probably no more than 200 inhabitants in the region could read and write. At most one or two were trained in natural sciences or All rights reserved medicine. The best insights we have into the landscape come from nar- No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form ratives of travelers and the periodic reports of the missions’ lands. They without permission in writing from the publisher. provide some idea of the extent of agriculture and the general vegeta- tion covering surrounding land. ISBN: 978-0-9749981-4-5 The stories of the visits of United Kingdom naturalists who came in Library of Congress Control Number: 2013907489 the 1830s illuminate the subject. They were educated men who came to the territory intentionally to examine the flora. They took notes and col- Cover photograph: lected specimens as botanists do today. Reviewing their contributions Matilija Poppy (Romneya trichocalyx), Barrett Lake, San Diego County now, we can imagine what they saw as they discovered plants we know.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens
    Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens A Guide for the Willamette Valley Native Gardening Awareness Program A Committee of the Emerald Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Members of the Native Gardening Awareness Program, a committee of the Emerald chapter of the NPSO, contributed text, editing, and photographs for this publication. They include: Mieko Aoki, John Coggins, Phyllis Fisher, Rachel Foster, Evelyn Hess, Heiko Koester, Cynthia Lafferty, Danna Lytjen, Bruce Newhouse, Nick Otting, and Michael Robert Spring 2005 1 2 Table of Contents Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens ...........................5 Shady Woodlands .................................................................7 Baneberry – Actaea rubra ................................................... 7 Broad-leaved Bluebells – Mertensia platyphylla .....................7 Hound’s-tongue – Cynoglossum grande ............................... 8 Broad-leaved Starflower –Trientalis latifolia ..........................8 Bunchberry – Cornus unalaschkensis (formerly C. canadensis) ....8 False Solomon’s-seal – Maianthemum racemosum ................ 9 Fawn Lily – Erythronium oregonum .........................................9 Ferns ..........................................................................10-12 Fringecup – Tellima grandiflora and T. odorata ..................... 12 Inside-out Flower – Vancouveria hexandra ....................... 13 Large-leaved Avens – Geum macrophyllum ...................... 13 Meadowrue – Thalictrum spp. ...............................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Sego Lily Newsletter
    Sego Lily Winter 2016 39 (1) Winter 2016 (volume 39 number 1) In this issue: Unidentified Flowering Object. 2 Bulletin Board . 3 UNPS News. 4 Chapter News and Events . 5 Are Herbaria Still Relevant in the 21st Century? . 6 Noteworthy Discoveries Spiny milkwort in the Uinta Basin . 9 Grow This: Desert Gardens . 10 Desert mule’s-ears (Wyethia scabra) forms dense mounds up to four feet across and two feet wide and produces numerous, cheerful, sunflower-like yellow heads over much of the spring and summer. Recently this species was transferred to its own genus, Scabrethia, for the sandpapery (“scabrous”) foliage. To learn more about growing this and other desert plants, see the article on page 10. Photos by Julie Kraft. Copyright 2016 UT Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Committees Website: For late-breaking news, the Conservation: Bill King & Tony Frates UNPS store, the Sego Lily archives, Chap- Education: Ty Harrison ter events, sources of native plants, Horticulture: Maggie Wolf the digital Utah Rare Plant Field Guide, Important Plant Areas: Mindy Wheeler and more, go to unps.org. Many thanks Invasive Weeds: Susan Fitts to Xmission for sponsoring our web- Publications: Larry Meyer & W. Fertig site. Rare Plants: Jason Alexander Officers Scholarship/Grants: Therese Meyer Sego Lily Editor: Walter Fertig President: Jason Alexander (Utah ([email protected]). The deadline Co) Chapters and Chapter Presidents for the Winter 2015/16 Sego Lily is 31 Vice President: Robert Fitts (Utah Co.) Cache: Michael Piep December 2015. Treasurer: Celeste Kennard (Utah Co), Canyonlands: Diane Ackerman & Sarah Secretary: Cathy King (Salt Lake Co.) Topp Copyright 2015 Utah Native Plant Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Allen's OCCNPS Presentation About Plant Families.Pages
    Stigma How to identify flowering plants Style Pistil Bob Allen, California Native Plant Society, OC chapter, occnps.org Ovary Must-knows • Flower, fruit, & seed • Leaf parts, shapes, & divisions Petal (Corolla) Anther Stamen Filament Sepal (Calyx) Nectary Receptacle Stalk Major local groups ©Bob Allen 2017 Apr 18 Page !1 of !6 A Botanist’s Dozen Local Families Legend: * = non-native; (*) = some native species, some non-native species; ☠ = poisonous Eudicots • Leaf venation branched; veins net-like • Leaf bases not sheathed (sheathed only in Apiaceae) • Cotyledons 2 per seed • Floral parts in four’s or five’s Pollen apertures 3 or more per pollen grain Petal tips often • curled inward • Central taproot persists 2 styles atop a flat disk Apiaceae - Carrot & Parsley Family • Herbaceous annuals & perennials, geophytes, woody perennials, & creepers 5 stamens • Stout taproot in most • Leaf bases sheathed • Leaves alternate (rarely opposite), dissected to compound Style “horns” • Flowers in umbels, often then in a secondary umbel • Sepals, petals, stamens 5 • Ovary inferior, with 2 chambers; styles 2; fruit a dry schizocarp Often • CA: Apiastrum, Yabea, Apium*, Berula, Bowlesia, Cicuta, Conium*☠ , Daucus(*), vertically Eryngium, Foeniculum, Torilis*, Perideridia, Osmorhiza, Lomatium, Sanicula, Tauschia ribbed • Cult: Apium, Carum, Daucus, Petroselinum Asteraceae - Sunflower Family • Inflorescence a head: flowers subtended by an involucre of bracts (phyllaries) • Calyx modified into a pappus • Corolla of 5 fused petals, radial or bilateral, sometimes both kinds in same head • Radial (disk) corollas rotate to salverform • Bilateral (ligulate) corollas strap-shaped • Stamens 5, filaments fused to corolla, anthers fused into a tube surrounding the style • Ovary inferior, style 1, with 2 style branches • Fruit a cypsela (but sometimes called an achene) • The largest family of flowering plants in CA (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyethia Angustifolia (DC.) Nutt
    Wyethia angustifolia (DC.) Nutt. California compassplant Asteraceae - aster family status: State Sensitive rank: G4 / SU General Description: Adapted from Flora of North America (1993+): Taprooted perennial plants 15-60 cm tall. Basal leaf blades dark green, nearly triangular to broadly lanceolate, 15-35 cm long, margins entire or irregularly serrate, upper sides with stiff hairs. Stem leaves alternate. Floral Characteristics: Heads large, radiate, usually solitary (sometimes 2-3). Involucres hemispheric, (1.5) 2-3 cm diameter. Involucral bracts conspicuously ciliate, outer faces hairy. Ray flowers yellow, (8) 12-14; petal 15-25 mm. Disc flowers many, corollas yellow, 5-lobed. Flowers May to July. Fruits: Achenes 7-8 mm, bearing small stiff hairs. Illustration by Jeanne R. Janish, Identification Tips: The genus Balsamorhiza is similar, but ©1959 University of Washington has mostly basal leaves; flowering stems are leafless or have Press a few opposite, strongly reduced leaves. In contrast, the stem leaves of Wyethia are alternate and generally larger. Wyethia amplexicaulis grows on the east side of the Cascades in WA, has hairless or gland-dotted leaf blades, involucral bracts lacking marginal cilia, and hairless achenes. Range: WA, OR, CA, west of the Cascades and historically in the Columbia River Gorge. Habitat/Ecology: Dry or seasonally wet open ground, grassy slopes, meadows, prairies, and openings in oak and pine-oak forests; found at elevations up to 2100 m (6900 ft) throughout photo by Joe Arnett its range. Populations in WA grow in moist or dry native prairie habitats and roadside prairie remnants, at about 65 m (200 ft) elevation. Associated species include tall oatgrass (Arrhenatherum elatius), Roemer's fescue (Festuca roemeri), upland larkspur (Delphinium nuttallii), tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobaea), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), and camas (Camassia quamash).
    [Show full text]
  • Common Wildflowers of the Coast to Crest Trail
    COMMON WILDFLOWERS OF THE COAST TO CREST AND CHINA GULCH TRAILS Mokelumne Watershed & Recreation Division EBMUD March 2015 Compiled using these references: Philip Munz, California Spring Wildflowers Peterson Field Guide, Pacific State Wildflowers Wildflower Walks and Roads of the Sierra Gold Country The Outdoor World of the Sacramento Region Weeds of the West Philip Munz, A California Flora & Supplement Originally compiled by Ranger/Naturalist II Steve Diers Updated by Ranger/Naturalist II Vanessa Stevens Color Scientific Name Common Name Blooms Habitat Notes, Location Blue Cynoglossum grande Hounds Tongue, May-Jul Shady woods MCCT at Gunsight Pass Grand Hounds Blue Eriodictyon californicum YerbaT Santa May-Jul Dry rocky slopes and ridges Turkey Hill Campground Blue Nemophila menziesii Baby Blue-eyes Mar-May Moist fields, slopes MCCT @ Log Boom Blue Lupinus bethamii Bentham's Lupine, Mar-Jun Raodbanks, slopes Sony Creek Road, east of the Spider Lupine Beauna Vista Road Intersection Blue Lupinus bicolor Miniature Lupine Mar-Jun Slopes, gravel Common Blue Lupinus nanus Sky Lupine, Douglas's Apr-May Slopes, grassy Lupine Blue Sisyrinchium bellum Blue-eyed Grass Feb-Jul Grassland Blue Salvia sonomensis Sonoma sage, May-Jun Slopes, chaparral McAffee Gulch Creeping sage Blue Trichostema lanceolatum Wooly Blue Curls, Jun-Oct Waste places Vinegar Weeds Blue Penstemon azureus Azure Pensteman May-Jul Slopes, dry Gunsight Pass Blue Veronica peregrina Speedwell April-Aug Grassland Mokelumne Office ssp. xalapensis Blue Gilia capitata Capitate Gilia,
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plant Propagation Protocol
    Jessica Taylor ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol for Wyethia amplexicaulis, Mule's Ears April 11, 2007 Image © 2004, Ben Legler Steve Hurst. Provided by ARS Systematic (WTU Herbarium Image Collection- Burke Botany and Mycology Laboratory. USA, NV. Museum, accessed 4/11/07) Usage Guidelines. (From the USDA website, accessed 4/11/07, altered from original) Family Names Family Scientific Name: Asteraceae Family Common Name: Sunflower Scientific Names Genus: Wyethia Species: amplexicaulis Nutt. Species Authority: Nathaniel Wyeth, who first collected it. Thomas Nuttall. Variety: N/A Sub-species: N/A Cultivar: N/A Authority for Variety/Sub-species: N/A Common Synonym Genus: *Espeletia Species: *amplexicaulis Nutt. (USDA, Knoke) Species Authority: N/A Variety: N/A Sub-species: N/A Cultivar: N/A Authority for Variety/Sub-species: Nathaniel Wyeth General Information Common Name: Mule's ears *northern mule-ears, smooth dwarf sunflower (Knoke) Species Code (as per USDA Plants WYAM database): Ecotype: Paradise Creek drainage near Pullman, Wa *Habitat : Slightly moist spots in the shrub-steppe, to open areas at mid-elevation. (Knoke) Date Entered or Updated 2/24/2005 (MM/DD/YY): General Distribution (elevation Western US east to Montana and south to range, ecosystems, etc): Colorado and Nevada where mean annual precipitation ranges from 12-20 inches (USDA, 2004). In eastern Washington it occurs in dry to mesic open slopes and meadows from sagebrush to open Ponderosa pine forest. In the northwestern US its wetland status is classified as FAC- (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1988). *East of the Cascades from British Columbia to Oregon (Knoke) Propagation Details Propagation Goal: Plants Propagation Method Seed Product Type: Container (plug) Stock Type: N/A Time to Grow: 10 Months Target Specifications: Tight root plug in container.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Needs of Arrowleaf Balsamroot, Balsamorhiza Sagittata (Heliantheae: Asteraceae)
    Western North American Naturalist 65(3), © 2005, pp. 359–364 POLLINATION NEEDS OF ARROWLEAF BALSAMROOT, BALSAMORHIZA SAGITTATA (HELIANTHEAE: ASTERACEAE) James H. Cane1 ABSTRACT.—Arrowleaf balsamroot, Balsamorhiza sagittata (Pursh) Nutt, is a common, sometimes dominant, long- lived forb that flowers early in spring from the foothills to upper-montane areas of the northern Rocky Mountains and Intermountain West. Public land managers desire its seed for rangeland rehabilitation. Through manual pollination field trials, the species was found to have a mixed pollination system. It is primarily xenogamous (46% of ovules yielded plump achenes) but partially self-compatible (31% of achenes were plump). Unvisited flower heads formed virtually no mature achenes; only plump achenes contained seeds with endosperm. Freely visited flower heads in 2 populations pro- duced as many achenes as manual outcross pollinations of flower heads, suggesting that seed production was not polli- nator limited. Two species of Osmia bees rely mostly on Balsamorhiza and its close relative, Wyethia, for pollen. At least 165 females per hectare will need to be stocked to achieve thorough flower visitation in cultivated seed production fields. Key words: Engelmanniinae, Osmia, Apiformes, Apoidea, bees, seed set, self-incompatibility, pollinator limitation. The balsamroots (Balsamorhiza, 14 spp.) and Farming seed crops often requires pollinator mule’s ears (Wyethia, 14 spp.) together form a supplementation. To evaluate pollination needs, monophyletic clade within the subtribe Engel- a plant species’ breeding biology must first be manniinae [largely equivalent to the former understood, but there are no published accounts Ecliptinae (Heliantheae: Asteraceae); Robinson for any species of Balsamorhiza, Wyethia, or 1981, Urbatsch and Jansen 1995, Clevinger any other species of their subtribe except and Panero 2000, Moore and Bohs 2003].
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Recovery Plan Revision for Gabbro Soil Plants of the Central Sierra
    Recovery Plan Revision for Gabbro Soil Plants of the Central Sierra Nevada Foothills: El Dorado bedstraw (Galium californicum ssp. sierrae) and Pine Hill flannelbush (Fremontodendron californicum ssp. decumbens) Original Approved: August 2002 Original Prepared by: Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office DRAFT AMENDMENT 1 We have identified best available information that indicates the need to amend recovery criteria for this species since the Recovery Plan for Gabbro Soil Plants of the Central Sierra Nevada Foothills (recovery plan) was completed. In this recovery plan modification, we synthesize the adequacy of the existing recovery criteria, show amended recovery criteria, and describe the rationale supporting the proposed recovery plan modification. The proposed criteria amendments are shown as an appendix that supplements the recovery plan, pages III-2 through III-37 of the recovery plan that applies to El Dorado bedstraw and Pine Hill flannelbush. For U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Sacramento, California December 2018 Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Region 8, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1 METHODOLOGY USED TO COMPLETE THE RECOVERY PLAN AMENDMENT This draft amendment was prepared by the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (SFWO) of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and will be peer reviewed in accordance with the OMB Peer Review Bulletin following the publication of the Notice of Availability. We used information from our files, survey information and monitoring reports spanning various localities of the species, and communication with species experts. Communication with species experts was our primary source to update the species status and threats, and was instrumental in developing amended recovery criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Plants of Utah
    DESERT PLANTS OF UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen Revised May 1996 HG 505 FOREWORD The original Desert Plants of Utah by Berniece A. Andersen has been a remarkably popular book, serving as a tribute to both her botanical knowledge of the region and to her enthusiastic manner. For these reasons, we have tried to retain as much of the original work, in both content and style, as possible. Some modifications were necessary. We have updated scientific names in accordance with changes that have occurred since the time of the first publication and we have also incorporated new geographic distributional data that have accrued with additional years of botanical exploration. The most obvious difference pertains to the organization of species. In the original version, species were organized phylogenetically, reflecting the predominant concepts of evolutionary relationships among plant families at that time. In an effort to make this version more user-friendly for the beginner, we have chosen to arrange the plants primarily by flower color. We hope that these changes will not diminish the enjoyment gained by anyone familiar with the original. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor TABLE OF CONTENTS The Nature of Deserts ........................................................1 Utah’s Deserts ........................................................2
    [Show full text]