DOCSLIB.ORG

No Peace Without Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No Peace Without Justice NO PEACE WITHOUT JUSTICE Workshop on Political Pluralism and Electoral Processes in the broader Middle East and North Africa 21 – 23 July 2005 Monastery of San Nicolò, Venice PARTICIPANT LIST Name Position Affiliation Country Mr Nicholas Abbott Regional Expert Engaging with the Islamic World UK Group, FCO Mr Ammar Abdulhamid Director DarEmar / Tharwa Project Syria Dr Abdulkhaleq Abdulla Professor Faculty of Humanities and Social United Arab Studies - Ain University Emirates Mr Abdel Rahman Abu Director The Arab Thought Forum Palestine Arafeh Ms Selma Acuner Program Officer TESEV's Foreign Policy Program Turkey Mr Mensur Akgün Program Director TESEV's Foreign Policy Program Turkey Mr Ezeddine Al Ashbahi Chair HRITC Yemen Dr Wajeeha Sadeq Al- Board Member Al Tajeed Cultural and Social Society Bahrain Baharna Ms Rana Ahmed Ghanem Chief Cultural Division Unionist Popular Yemen Al-Dubai Organization Mr Abdul Karim Al-Eryani Secretary General People's General Congress Yemen Ms Hatoon al-Fassi Professor King Saud University Saudi Arabia Mr Khaled al-Hammadi Journalist/Sana'a Al-Quds Al-Arabi, daily independent Yemen Correspondent newspaper Ms Jamila Ali Coordinator of DAD HRITC Yemen Program Mr Abdulwahab Alkebsi Senior Program National Endowment for Democracy USA Officer for the Middle East and North Africa Mr Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja President Bahrain Centre for Human Rights Bahrain Mr Fouad Allam Journalist La Repubblica Italy Imam Al Sadig Al Saddig Chairman of the Umma Party Sudan Abdelrahman Al-Mahdi Umma Party Mr Mohamed Abdul Malik Professor of Political Sana'a University Yemen Al-Mutawakil Science Mr Mohamed Al-Tayeb Chairman Committee for Human Rights, Yemen Liberties & Civic Organizations, Shura Council This is the provisional list of participants. Please contact the Secretariat with your corrections. Workshop on Political Pluralism and Electoral Processes in the broader Middle East and North Africa 21 – 23 July 2005, Monastery of San Nicolò, Venice Name Position Affiliation Country Dr Abdelaziz al-Uwaisheg Former UN Official Saudi Arabia Mr Khaled Alyemany Officer in Charge Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yemen Mr Amin Baktiar Former Minister of Iraq Human Rights Mr Daoud Barakat Board Member Palestinian Diaspora and Refugee Palestine SHAML Centre Ms Anna Barducci-Mahjar Journalist Il Foglio Italy Ms Amal Basha Chairperson Sister's Arab Forum for Human Rights Yemen Mr Ali Belhaj Président Maroc 2020 Morocco Ms Rhizlaine Benachir Vice coordinatrice Forum des Femmes Marocaines Morocco Nationale, et élue Municipalité Souissi Rabat municipale Souissi Rabat Jossour Mr Noureddine Ben MP Algerian Parliament Algeria Braham Mr Joseph Bolton Foreign Service Engaging with the Islamic World UK Officer Group, FCO The Hon Emma Bonino MEP European Parliament Italy Mr Massimo Bordin Director Radio Radicale Italy Ms Amina Bouayach Vice-Président Organisation Marocaine des Droits de Morocco l’Homme Mr Marino Busdachin Secretary-General Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Italy Organisation (UNPO) Mr Stefano Carluccio Director Critica Sociale Italy Ms Rola Dashti Chair Kuwait economic society Kuwait Mr Koen De Feyter Professor, E.MA European Inter-University Centre for Italy Academic Coordinator Human Rights and Democratisation (EIUC) The Hon Gianni De MEP European Parliament EU Michelis Mr Gianfranco Dell'Alba Secretary General NPWJ Italy Dr Elhabib Eddaqqaq Member Political Office of Constitutional Union Morocco Party/ Professor of Law Mr Saad Dine El Otmani Secrétaire Général Parti de la Justice et du Morocco Développement Mr Abdellah El Oualladi Président Organisation Marocaine des Droits Morocco Humains Ms Hoda El-Khatib Lawyer - Professor at Organisation for Civil Act Lebanon Saint Joseph University Mr Hassan Elsawaf Businessman Khaldun Centre for Developmental Egypt Studies Board Dr Reza Eslami Soema Assistant Professor UNESCO Chair for Human Rights, Iran Peace and Democracy, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran 2 Workshop on Political Pluralism and Electoral Processes in the broader Middle East and North Africa 21 – 23 July 2005, Monastery of San Nicolò, Venice Name Position Affiliation Country Mr Said Essoulami Executive Director Centre for Media Freedom, Middle Morocco East and North Africa Dr Munira A Fakhro Associate Professor University of Bahrain Bahrain Mr Mohamed Farid- Former Member of Egypt Hassanein Parliament Mr Niccolo' Figà- Program Director NPWJ Belgium Talamanca Mr Horst Fischer President European Inter-University Centre for Germany Human Rights and Democratisation (EIUC) Mr David French Chief Executive Westminster Foundation for UK Democracy Mr Farid Ghadry President Reform Party of Syria Syria Mr Zeki Levent Gümrükçü Head of Policy Ministry of Foreign Affair - Ankara, Turkey Planning Department Turkey Ms Sabiha Gundogar Program Officer TESEV's Foreign Policy Program Turkey Ms Sanem Güner Program Officer TESEV's Foreign Policy Program Turkey Mr Guy Haarscher Professor Université Libre de Bruxelles, EIUC Belgium Ms Barbara Haig Vice President National Endowment for Democracy USA (NED) Mr Gabor Halmai Professor EIUC Latvia Mr Bahey Eldin Hassan Director Cairo Institute for Human Rights Egypt Studies (CIHRS) Ms Barbara Ibrahim Regional Director Population Council, Cairo Egypt Dr Saad Eddin Ibrahim Director Khaldun Centre for Developmental Egypt Studies Mr Aboubakr Jamai Editor in Chief Le Journal Morocco Mrs Shahida Nighat Jamil Barrister-at-law, Former Federal Minister of Law, Pakistan Advocate, High Court Justice and Human Rights; and of Sindh Former Federal Minister of Environment, Local Government and Rural Development Ms Ghada Yusuf Jamsheer President of Women Women's Petition Committee Bahrain Violence Resistance Under Amnesty Supervision Professor Habib Jenhani Professor Human Rights and Science College Tunisia Mr Hisham Kassem Vice-Chairman and Al Masry Al Youm – Daily Independent Egypt CEO Mr Salah Khalil Businessman Egypt Ms Ellen Khouri Consultant and Human Rights and Democratisation Jordan Trainer Mr Hussein Kneiber Correspondent al-Arabiya Belgium Mr Wahid Labidi Political & Economic Middle East Partnership Initiative Tunisia Specialist (MEPI) Regional Office, US Embassy, Tunis 3 Workshop on Political Pluralism and Electoral Processes in the broader Middle East and North Africa 21 – 23 July 2005, Monastery of San Nicolò, Venice Name Position Affiliation Country Mr Gerard Philippe Directeur Résident National Democratic Institute (NDI) Morocco Latulippe Morocco Mr Jonathan Levack Program Assistant TESEV's Foreign Policy Program Turkey Ms Miriam Mafai Journalist La Repubblica Italy Mr Ziad Majed Project Coordinator IDEA "Democracy in the Arab World Lebanon Project" Professor Mona Makram- Adjunct Political Science Department, Egypt Ebeid Professor/President American University in Cairo/ Association for Advancement of Education Dr Riad Malki Director General Panorama, The Palestinian Centre for Palestine the Dissemination of Democracy and Community Development Mr Mohsen Marzouk Algeria Project Freedom House Tunisia Director The Hon Edward Vice-President European Parliament EU McMillan-Scott Ms Mariam Memarsadeghi Senior Program Freedom House USA Manager, Middle East and North Africa Mr Allal Mourad Coordinateur general Non-Governmental Platform for the Tunisia EuroMed Civil Forum Mr Ahmad Nader Nadery Commissioner Afghan Independent Human Rights Afghanistan Commission Mr Aktham Naisse Lawyer, President of Committees for the Defense of Syria C.D.F Democratics and Human Rights in Syria Mr Lapo Orlandi ERA Italy Ms Francesca Paci Journalist La Stampa Italy Mr Alireza Rabi Chair Middle East Citizens Assembly Iran Ms Rend Rahim Francke Executive Director Iraq Foundation Iraq Mr Gianni Riotta Journalist Corriere della sera Italy Mr Walid Salem Coordinator Middle East Citizens Assembly (MECA) Palestine Mr Sergio Scarantino Minister Ministry of Foreign Affairs Italy Plenipotentiary Ms Laura Schulz Foreign Affairs Office of the Middle East Partnership USA Officer, Political and Initiative, U.S. Department Women's Pillars of State Mr Mustafa Sediqi Journalist Tolo TV Afghanistan Dr Emad El-Din Shahin Professor American University in Cairo Egypt Mr Ashur Shamis Editor, Founding Libya Human and Political Libya Member Development Forum Mr Mohamed Zaki Secretary of Imam Al Umma Party Sudan Mahmoud Shamseldin Sadig Al Mahdi Mr Hussain Sinjari President Iraq Institute for Democracy Iraq Mr Jourchi Slaheddine Vice President Tunisian League of Human Rights Tunisia 4 Workshop on Political Pluralism and Electoral Processes in the broader Middle East and North Africa 21 – 23 July 2005, Monastery of San Nicolò, Venice Name Position Affiliation Country Mr Raji Sourani Director Palestinian Centre for Human Rights Palestine Mr Roberto Spagnoli Journalist Radio Radicale Italy Mr Antonio Spinelli Senior Program International IDEA Sweden Officer, Electoral Processes Mr Sadeq Jawad Sulaiman Former Ambassador Oman to Washington Mr George Ulrich Secretary General European Inter-University Centre for Denmark Human Rights and Democratisation (EIUC) Mr Diego Vecchiato Director, International Regione Veneto Italy Relations Mr Pierluigi Vigna Journalist Corriere Magazine Italy Ms Tammy Wincup Foreign Affairs Officer Office of the Middle East Partnership USA Initiative, U.S. Department of State Professor Mohammed Professor of Political Garyounis University in Benghazi Libya Zahi Mogherbi Science 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics Behind the Ebola Crisis
    The Politics Behind the Ebola Crisis Africa Report N°232 | 28 October 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Pre-epidemic Situation ..................................................................................................... 3 A. Liberia ........................................................................................................................ 4 B. Sierra Leone ............................................................................................................... 5 C. Guinea ........................................................................................................................ 7 III. How Misinformation, Mistrust and Myopia Amplified the Crisis ................................... 8 A. Misinformation and Hesitation ................................................................................. 8 B. Extensive Delay and its Implications ........................................................................ 9 C. Quarantine and Containment ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Organisations on 5 Continents
    FIDH represents 164 human rights organisations on 5 continents FIDH - International Federation for Human Rights 17, passage de la Main-d’Or - 75011 Paris - France CCP Paris: 76 76 Z Tel: (33-1) 43 55 25 18 / Fax: (33-1) 43 55 18 80 www.fi dh.org ANNUAL REPORT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Cover: © AFP/MOHAMMED ABED Egypt, 16 December 2011. 04 Our Fundamentals 06 164 member organisations 07 International Board 08 International Secretariat 10 Priority 1 Protect and support human rights defenders 15 Priority 2 Promote and protect women’s rights 19 Priority 3 Promote and protect migrants’ rights 24 Priority 4 Promote the administration of justice and the i ght against impunity 33 Priority 5 Strengthening respect for human rights in the context of globalisation 38 Priority 6 Mobilising the community of States 43 Priority 7 Support the respect for human rights and the rule of law in conl ict and emergency situations, or during political transition 44 > Asia 49 > Eastern Europe and Central Asia 54 > North Africa and Middle East 59 > Sub-Saharan Africa 64 > The Americas 68 Internal challenges 78 Financial report 2011 79 They support us Our Fundamentals Our mandate: Protect all rights Interaction: Local presence - global action The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) is an As a federal movement, FIDH operates on the basis of interac- international NGO. It defends all human rights - civil, political, tion with its member organisations. It ensures that FIDH merges economic, social and cultural - as contained in the Universal on-the-ground experience and knowledge with expertise in inter- Declaration of Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Budgetary Procedure 4
    2006 BUDGETARY PROCEDURE Doc No: 4: (3) ******* 29.09.2005 COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS RAPPORTEURS: GIOVANNI PITTELLA - SECTION III (COMMISSION) VALDIS DOMBROVSKIS - OTHER SECTIONS PARLIAMENT - 1st READING Amendments submitted to the meeting of the Committee on Budgets of 4, 5 and 6 October 2005 EN EN Draft amendment 0066 === FEMM/6590=== Budget reference line : 17 03 01 01 << Tabled by Katerina Batzeli, Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality >> ------------------------------- Volume 4 (section 3) — Commission Item 17 03 01 01 Public health (2003 to 2008) Amend remarks as follows: 17 03 01 01 Budget 2005 PDB 2006 DB 2006 AMENDMENT DB+AMENDMENT Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Appropriations 51 300 000 51 895 000 51 500 000 51 457 644 51 500 000 51 457 644 51 500 000 51 457 644 Reserves Heading: Public health (2003 to 2008) Remarks: After paragraph The aim of the new programme of Community action in ..........illness and diseases, and obviating sources of danger to health. Amend text as follows: Its three main priorities are: — to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health and the strengthening and maintenance of effective health interventions and efficient health systems, by developing and operating a well-structured and comprehensive system for collecting, analysing, evaluating and imparting health information and knowledge to competent authorities, health professionals and the public, and by undertaking assessments of and reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Spitzenkandidaten Process
    BRIEFING Election of the President of the European Commission Understanding the Spitzenkandidaten process SUMMARY The European Parliament has long sought to ensure that, by voting in European elections, European citizens not only elect the Parliament itself, but also have a say over who would head the EU executive – the European Commission. What became known as the 'Spitzenkandidaten process' is a procedure whereby European political parties, ahead of European elections, appoint lead candidates for the role of Commission President, with the presidency of the Commission then going to the candidate of the political party capable of marshalling sufficient parliamentary support. The Parliament remains firmly committed to repeating the process in 2019 and, with EP elections now only weeks away, attention has shifted to the European political parties. A number of parties have nominated lead candidates, and this briefing gives an overview of their nominees, as well as looking more broadly at the process. This is a revised and further updated edition of an earlier briefing; previous edition from February 2019. Lead candidates of the six European political parties due to participate in the Eurovision debate, to be held in Parliament’s Brussels hemicycle, on 15 May 2019. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Laura Tilindyte Members' Research Service PE 630.264 – April 2019 EN EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service The 2019 elections: European political parties It is widely acknowledged that the European political parties will play a crucial role for the future of the Spitzenkandidaten procedure. In this respect, commentators consistently point to the daunting and, before 2014, unprecedented challenge of a multilingual, continent-wide campaign in 27 or 28 countries, each with their own political culture and sensitivities.1 The Commission has made recommendations (February 2018) in this regard, suggesting, for example, earlier selection of the lead candidates (ideally by the end of 2018), leaving more time for the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminist Movement in the Moroccan Spring: Roles, Specificity, and Gains
    Sociology Study, December 2015, Vol. 5, No. 12, 895‐910 D doi: 10.17265/2159‐5526/2015.12.001 DAVID PUBLISHING The Feminist Movement in the Moroccan Spring: Roles, Specificity, and Gains Mohammed Yachoultia Abstract The Moroccan Spring in 2011 has been a golden opportunity for Moroccan women to put their country on the democratization track. Their decision to take an integral part in all aspects of the uprisings stems from their belief that their participation and contribution are necessary for any potential democratic changes that would undoubtedly secure and bring them more rights. However, the appointment of only one female minister in the first Islamist‐led government and the reluctance to implement the provisions of the new constitution, namely the issue of gender parity, are but two of the new alarming examples that have disappointed Moroccan women. Based on interviews with women’s movement organizations’ leaders and 20 February Movement (20‐FMVT) female activists and through following the development of the Arab Spring in Morocco in particular and in the Middle Eastern & Northern Africa region in general, this paper considers the different roles, specificity, and gains of Moroccan women during and after the so‐called Moroccan Spring. The paper argues that despite their limited gains in the aftermath of this momentum, Moroccan women managed once again to prove their agency and ability to change laws and instigate reforms. Keywords Moroccan women, Arab Spring, 20 February Movement (20‐FMVT), democracy Anyone familiar with Moroccan women’s Northern Africa) region (the best examples to mention achievements in the last two decades will not be here are the family and the Nationality Codes), surprised by their active role in the “Moroccan Spring”.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Hyperleaders: Communication Strategies on Social Networks at the 2019 European Elections
    Italian Political Science, VOLUME 14 ISSUE 2, OCTOBER 2019 Digital Hyperleaders: Communication Strategies on Social Networks at the 2019 European Elections Cristopher Cepernich UNIVERSITY OF TURIN Roberta Bracciale UNIVERSITY OF PISA Abstract This article investigates the state of development of the electoral communication of Italian political leaders at the elections for the 2019 European Parliament. The aim was to verify which attitudes and forms of adaptation used in the communication strategies of so-called ‘hyperleaders’ have developed towards the network media logic. The research considers the following analytical dimensions: the extent of leaders’ fan bases; the effect of publi- cation frequency in terms of engagement; the effect of issue management in terms of engagement, and the effect of emotionalization of messages in terms of engagement. The results suggest the consolidation of a digital model of communication via social networks that connects, above all, Salvini, Di Maio and Meloni. They have in common specific attitudes and forms of adaptation to the network media logic, i.e. eminently a much greater capacity to engage in relation to the largeness of the public, the strategic use of key issues and emotional frame management. 1. A hybrid and postmedial election campaign he election campaign for the 2019 European elections, which took place just over a year after the general elections, confirmed the hypothesis of a new phase of cam- Tpaigning (Cepernich 2017; Stromer-Galley 2014). In line with the transformations occurring in all democracies at an advanced stage of mediatization (Esser and Strömbäck 2014; Kriesi et al. 2013; Mazzoleni and Schultz 1999), even in Italy, the election campaign has become hybrid and postmedial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Media Habits of Italian Political Leaders and Parties
    Italian Political Science, VOLUME 13 ISSUE 1, MAY 2018 Hybrid 2018 campaigning: the social media habits of Italian political leaders and parties Roberta Bracciale UNIVERSITY OF PISA Cristopher Cepernich UNIVERSITY OF TURIN Abstract The electoral communication flows produced by leaders, parties, and the main candidates are the result of hybrid media logics and this is due to the environment in which they develop, and to the communicative strategies used. These strategies are generated by the intersection of traditional media logics (TV, radio, press) with digital media logics (Internet). This article investigates the social media communication habits of the main Italian leaders and political parties on Twitter and Facebook. To understand how the hybrid campaign developed in the Italian con- text, specific indicators were identified to operationalize social media habits related to: (a) communicative strategy, based on the productivity of the account (broadcast) and on its degree of interactivity (conversational), (b) skillfulness, regarding the capability to use different features of the social media platform; and (c) engage- ment, related to the capacity of the account to involve the audience. Results show that a more skillful use of the platforms, combined with a conversational communication strategy, produce more engaging messages regard- less the specific political actor (leader or party). Finally, the outcomes show a significant strengthening of hybrid media campaigning during the last Italian general elections on 4 March 2018. 1. Hybrid Campaigning he political campaign during the last Italian general elections on 4 March 2018 shows a significant consolidation of hybrid media campaigning. The electoral Tcommunication flows produced by leaders, parties and the main candidates are the result of hybrid media logics, because such is the environment in which they are structured.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of the Right of Ngos to Funding: from Harassment to Criminalisation
    2013 “The topic of this year’s report is most pertinent as lately we have witnessed increased stigmatization and undue restrictions in relation to access to funding and resources for civil society organizations, in REPORT ANNUAL an attempt to stifle any forms of criticism, especially calls for democratic change or accountability for human rights violations. [...] I am particularly dismayed about laws or policies stigmatizing recipients due to their sources of funding, which have been adopted in the past months or are under consideration, Violations of the right in several countries across the world”. “I am confident that the Observatory report and my work in this field will be complementary and of NGOs to funding: mutually beneficial. I hope our joint efforts will succeed and will pave the way for better respect of the right to freedom of association, especially its core component, the access to funding and resources, in all parts of the world. It is ultimately the obligation of Member States to fully protect this right, OMCTFIDH - from harassment which shall be enjoyed by everyone”. Maina Kiai, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association. to criminalisation The Annual Report 2013 of the Observatory provides a global review of the violations of the right of NGOs to funding. It provides a detailed picture of this as yet little studied problem, the growing Foreword by Maina Kiai dimension of which is a worrying concern. This picture is illustrated with around thirty country situations affecting human rights organisations. While recalling the legal basis of this right, as well as its organic relationship with the right to freedom of association and the embryonic jurisprudence on this subject, the report stimulates deep reflection on the negative impacts of these restrictive measures and makes concrete recommendations to all relevant stakeholders (beneficiaries, donors, governments and intergovernmental organisations).
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of Special Events for the Schools of Political Studies
    PROGRAMME OF SPECIAL EVENTS FOR THE SCHOOLS OF POLITICAL STUDIES FROM 18 TO 20 NOVEMBER 2015 Strasbourg SCHOOLS OF POLITICAL STUDIES SCHOOLS OF POLITICAL STUDIES OVERALL FORUM STRUCTURE Wednesday Thursday Friday 18 November 19 November 20 November 9.30-10.15 SPEED NETWORKING 9.00-11.00 PLENARY SESSION 4 BY PROFESSION 9.00-10.30 10.30-11.15 PLENARY SESSION 3 11.30-12.30 AM CLOSING SESSION DIPLOMA 11.00-12.30 AND DEMOCRACY CEREMONY LAB SERIES 1 INNOVATION 11.30-13.00 AWARD THEMATIC SESSIONS 13.15-14.30 12.30-14.00 12.30-14.00 Lunch Restaurant of the Restaurant of the Restaurant of the European Parliament European Parliament European Parliament 14.00-14.15 FAMILY 14.00-15.30 15.30-16.45 PHOTOGRAPH LAB SERIES 2 OFFICIAL OPENING (SPS LAB No. 13) 14.30-16.00 OF THE WORLD THEMATIC FORUM 16.00-17.30 SESSIONS PM LAB SERIES 3 16.45-18.15 14.30-15.30 PLENARY SESSION 1 18.00-19.00 BILATERAL 18.30-19.45 DIALOGUE WITH MEETINGS PLENARY SESSION 2 INTERNATIONAL LEADERS 16.30-17.30 BILATERAL MEETINGS Welcome reception Blue Restaurant Evening of the Council of Europe SPS SPECIAL PROGRAMME FORUM CORE PROGRAMME Programme of special events ► Page 2 he Secretariat of the Schools of Political Studies warmly welcomes the 500 participants from the twenty-one Schools who are here in Strasbourg T for the Fourth World Forum for Democracy. ■ The Forum intends to be a place where you – young democratic leaders – are exposed to cutting-edge ideas and first-rate discussion on issues relating to democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing EU-Russia Relations
    “We are living through a global counter-revolution. The institutions and values of liberal internationalism are being eroded beneath our feet and societies are becoming increasingly polarised. The consensus for EU action is increasingly difficult to forge, but there is a way forward. In this new world, on our tenth anniversary, the European Council on Foreign Relations will take a bottom-up approach to building grassroots consensus for greater cooperation on European foreign and security policy. Our vision is to demonstrate that engaging in common European action remains the most effective way of protecting European citizens. But we will reach out beyond those already converted to our message, framing our ideas and calls for action in a way that resonates with key decision- makers and the wider public across Europe’s capitals.” Mark Leonard, Director “ We believe a common foreign policy will allow individual countries to increase their global influence. A strong European voice in favour of human rights, democracy and international law will not just benefit Europeans; it will be good for the world.” Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer, Mark Leonard and Mabel van Oranje writing in the Financial Times, 1 October 2007 ecfr.eu Our leadership The European Council on Foreign Relations We provide a safe meeting space for decision- (ECFR) is an award-winning international makers and influencers to share ideas for think-tank that aims to conduct cutting-edge common action; we promote informed debate independent research in pursuit of a on Europe’s role in the world; and we build coherent, effective and values-based pan-European coalitions for policy change.
    [Show full text]
  • REY Commission (1967-1970)
    COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION 1958-2004 HALLSTEIN Commission (1958-1967) REY Commission (1967-1970) MALFATTI – MANSHOLT Commission (1970-1973) ORTOLI Commission (1973-1977) JENKINS Commission (1977-1981) THORN Commission (1981-1985) DELORS Commission (1985) DELORS Commission (1986-1988) DELORS Commission (1989-1995) SANTER Commission (1995-1999) PRODI Commission (1999-2004) HALLSTEIN COMMISSION 1 January 1958 – 30 June 1967 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Walter HALLSTEIN President Administration Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-President Agriculture Robert MARJOLIN Vice-President Economics and Finance Piero MALVESTITI Vice-President Internal Market Guiseppe CARON (resigned September 1959) (24 November 1959) (resigned 15 May 1963) Guido COLONNA di PALIANO (30 July 1964) Robert LEMAIGNEN Member Overseas Development Henri ROCHEREAU (resigned January 1962) (10 January 1962) Jean REY Member External Relations Hans von der GROEBEN Member Competition Guiseppe PETRILLI Member Social Affairs Lionello LEVI-SANDRI (resigned September 1960) (8 February 1961) named Vice-president (30 July 1064) Michel RASQUIN (died 27 April 1958) Member Transport Lambert SCHAUS (18 June 1958) REY COMMISSION 2 July 1967 – 1 July 1970 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Jean REY President Secretariat General Legal Service Spokesman’s Service Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-president Agriculture Lionelle LEVI SANDRI Vice-president Social Affairs Personnel/Administration Fritz HELLWIG Vice-president Research and Technology Distribution of Information Joint
    [Show full text]
  • In EU Elections Salvini Triumphs, Di Maio Suffers. So Now What? Published on Iitaly.Org (
    In EU Elections Salvini Triumphs, Di Maio Suffers. So Now What? Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) In EU Elections Salvini Triumphs, Di Maio Suffers. So Now What? Judith Harris (May 27, 2019) In Sunday's elections in Italy for the EU Parliament, acknowledged as a test for the Italian government itself, Matteo Salvini's Lega doubled its vote of just one year ago while the vote for his governing partner Luigi Di Maio's Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)) was literally slashed in half. The Italian vote abroad was a fascinating variation on the Italian vote at home. Zingaretti's Partito Democratico won hands down, topping all the others at 32.2%. By comparison, the Lega sagged far behind, with just over 18% while the M5S trailed, with barely 14%. ROME -- For once all the Italian media, from left to right, concurred. In Sunday's elections in Italy for the EU Parliament, acknowledged as a test for the Italian government itself, Matteo Salvini's Lega doubled its vote of just one year ago while the vote for his governing partner Luigi Di Maio's Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)) was literally slashed in half. In a stunning turn-about Deputy Premier Salvini's right-wing party copped 34.4% of the vote by comparison with its 17% in national general elections held just one year ago. By comparison Deputy Premier Di Maio's M5S slumped from 32.7% to 16.9%. At just 56%, the Italian turnout was low, especially when compared with the 85.8% of 1979, the first Page 1 of 3 In EU Elections Salvini Triumphs, Di Maio Suffers.
    [Show full text]