Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan 2011 Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan Prepared for Molalla River Watch / Molalla River Watershed Council and Molalla River Improvement District Prepared by Cascade Environmental Group, LLC 222 NW Davis Street, Suite 317 Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 894‐8585 Contact: John Runyon November 2011 Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan — November 2011 Contents Section Page Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Watershed Setting ................................................................................................................... 5 Issues and Restoration Approaches ....................................................................................... 8 Flooding ....................................................................................................................... 9 Low Flows and High Water Temperatures ................................................................ 10 Habitat Modifications ................................................................................................. 10 Fragmentation of Wildlife Habitat .............................................................................. 11 ESA-Listed Fish ......................................................................................................... 11 General River and Floodplain Characteristics ....................................................................... 13 Coordinate Systems Used ......................................................................................... 13 Molalla River Floodplain Characteristics ................................................................... 14 Lack of Secondary Channels and Off-Channel Habitat .................................... 14 Active Channel Migration .................................................................................. 15 Water Quality: High Water Temperatures and Some Nutrients ................................. 15 Reach Descriptions ............................................................................................................... 34 Reach 6 (Rkm 44 to Rkm 41) .................................................................................... 34 Reach 5 (Rkm 41 to Rkm 33) .................................................................................... 35 Reach 4 (Rkm 33 to Rkm 18) .................................................................................... 36 Reach 3 (Rkm 18 to Rkm 10) .................................................................................... 39 Reach 2 (Rkm 10 to Rkm 3) ...................................................................................... 40 Reach 1 (Rkm 3 to Rkm 0.00) ................................................................................... 43 Priorities for Action ................................................................................................................ 44 Restoration Goals ...................................................................................................... 44 Recommended Restoration Actions .......................................................................... 45 Restoration Activities for the Entire Middle and Lower Molalla River ........................ 45 Landowner Outreach and Education ................................................................ 46 Invasive Plant Species Control ......................................................................... 46 Fish Population and Passage Barrier Assessment .......................................... 47 Evaluation of Areas at High Risk of Flooding ................................................... 48 Restoration Priority of Individual Reaches ................................................................. 48 Project Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 51 Glossary ................................................................................................................................... i Appendix A: U.S. Geological Survey Report: Geomorphic Setting, Aquatic Habitat, and Water-Quality Conditions of the Molalla River, Oregon i Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan — November 2011 Figures Figure Page Figure 1. Floating the lower Molalla River (Reach 4) with Bill Taylor and Kathryn Duthie, board members of Molalla River Watch and Molalla River Improvement District, respectively, July 2011. .......................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Overview of the Molalla River watershed and the middle and lower river channel and floodplain (divided into reaches, see text below) that is the focus of this action plan…….. ................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 3. An example of how large portions of the City of Canby are perched above the Molalla River on bluffs composed of Missoula Flood deposits. .............................. 7 Figure 4. The maps here and on following pages show the six reaches delineated by the USGS study, depicting the channel location, extent of the historical floodplain, and features that constrain active channel movement (bedrock and revetments) ....... 16 Figure 5. The HAWS maps here and on the following pages show the historical floodplain of the Molalla River and delineate side channels and other secondary channel features that are important for both fish and wildlife habitat and absorbing floodwaters. .......................................................................................................... 25 Figure 6. Aerial photos showing shifts in wetted channel location in Reach 3 in 1994, 2000, 2006, and 2010 ..................................................................................................... 33 Figure 7. The Molalla River within Reach 6, illustrating how bedrock shapes the river’s habitat and restricts channel movement ............................................................... 35 Figure 8. An example of an engineered revetment along Reach 5 that protects South Molalla Forest Road from erosion by the river. ..................................................... 36 Figure 9. An example of an eroding bank in Reach 4. ........................................................ 37 Figure 10. Aerial photos showing the extent of bank erosion from lateral migration of the river channel along a section of Reach 4 in 1994, 2000, 2006, and 2010 ........... 37 Figure 11. An example of a large wood jam in Reach 4. ....................................................... 39 Figure 12. An example of the wide active channel area, large wood, and extensive floodplain forests within Reach 3. ......................................................................................... 41 Figure 13. Aerial photos (2010 top;1994 bottom) illustrating the wide and active floodplain within Reach 3 ...................................................................................................... 42 Figure 14. An aerial photo of Reach 1, which extends from the confluence of the Pudding River to the Willamette River ................................................................................ 43 Figure 15. An example of a Japanese knotweed infestation along Reach 4 of the Molalla River. .................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 16. Restoration project site locations ......................................................................... 55 ii Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan — November 2011 Tables Table Page Table 1. Major Floods on the Molalla River since 1964 ......................................................... 9 Table 2. Restoration Priority of Each Reach. …………………………………………….…… 48 Table 3. Restoration Project Sites, Habitat Issues, and Restoration Opportunities ............ 50 Table 4. Criteria for Ranking Restoration Projects .............................................................. 53 Table 5. Restoration Project Priority Ratings for Each Criterion .......................................... 55 iii Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan — November 2011 Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB grant # 210-3007) and the Oregon Governor's Fund for the Environment (administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation). The Middle and Lower Molalla River Restoration Action Plan is dedicated to the memory of Bob Reynolds. His leadership of the Molalla River Improvement District made this project possible. The following organizations and individuals contributed to this plan: U.S. Geological Survey: Kurt Carpenter, Chris Magirl, Christiana Czuba, Mathieu Marineau, Steve Sobieszczyk, Jonathan Czuba, and Mackenzie Keith Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Todd Alsbury Clackamas County Soil and Water Conservation District: Jeremy Baker and Jenne Reische Molalla River Improvement District: Kathryn Duthie and Alan Gallagher Molalla River Watch, Inc.: Bill Taylor and Kay Patteson Isaac Sanders (previously with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife) and Cindy Kolomechuk (previously with Clackamas County Soil and Water Conservation District) assisted with the early phase of this project. We also want to thank all the Molalla River landowners who volunteered to participate in restoration projects.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M
    Agenda Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – Council Chambers 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: 2. Approval of Minutes: A. March 22, 2018 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion 4. Adjournment: https://destinyhosted.com/print_all.cfm?seq=3604&reloaded=true&id=48237 3/29/2018 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – City Council Chambers Meeting Started at 6:00pm 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: Members present: Bryan Detty, Keith Hensley, Vicki Dix, Nancy Byrge, Vincent King & Richard Shaw Members NOT present: Toni Webb • Nina Deam was resigned from the Committee 2. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes to Approval 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion • Mr. King mentioned the “Meet Me at the Park” $20,000 Grant campaign. • Mr. Detty mentioned the Lowe’s communication. • Ms. Byrge discussed the March 29, 2018 email (Copy Enclosed) • Mr. Shaw discussed access to a Shared Drive for additional information. • Mr. King shared concerns regarding “Banning” smoking at the park as no park in Huber is currently banned. • Ms. Byrge suggested Benches inside and out of the park area. • Mr. Hensley and the committee discussed in length the optional sizes for the park. • Mr. Detty expressed interest in a limestone entrance area. • Mr. Hensley suggested the 100ft distance from the North line of the Neighbors and the School property line to the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oregon Association of School Libraries Fall Conference 2018
    Journal of the Oregon Association of School Libraries Fall Conference 2018 Volume 47 Issue No. 1 Fall Conference 2018 – In this Issue – 3 Welcome from the Conference Chair by Holly Chidsey-Gardner 4 From the President’s Google Drive by Stuart Levy 5–6 Saturday Sessions at OASL Wilsonville by Stuart Levy and Holly Chidsey-Gardner 6 Conference Committee 7 Shannon McClintock Miller, OASL Preconference and Keynote Speaker by Holly Chidsey-Gardner 7–8 An Evening with Mitali Perkins by Paige Battle 9–10 Friday Dessert with R. Gregory Christie by Paige Battle 10–11 Mike Lawrence: Star Author by Paige Battle 11–12 Author Kathleen Lane by Paige Battle 12 2018 OASL Silent Auction by Jane Morgan 13 OASL Cares 13 Call for 2018 Posters 14–15 What to Do in Wilsonville by Holly Chapman 16 First Timer Scholarship by Lori Lieberman 16 Saturday Evening Awards Dinner 16 Conference Schedule Overview 17 From the ParaPro by Laura Stewart 18 ORCA Nominees 18 BCCCA Nominees 19 OBOB Titles 21–22 Intellectual Freedom by Miranda Doyle 21–25 Resource Roundup by Jen Maurer Journal of the Oregon Association of School Libraries Fall Conference 2018 Issue Editor ....... Holly Chidsey-Gardner Coordinating Editor ....... Dana Berglund Assistant Coordinating Editor ....... Erin Fitzpatrick-Bjorn Layout/Printing ....... Paula Lewis/Clackamas ESD Printing OREGON ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL LIBRARIES dba Oregon Educational Media Association MISSION STATEMENT OASL provides progressive leadership to pursue excellence in school library media programs by: • advocating information literacy
    [Show full text]
  • Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and Decision Record
    Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and Decision Record Environmental Assessment Number: DOI-BLM-OR-S040-2010-0003-EA July 2011 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Salem District Clackamas County, Oregon T6S-R3E, T7S-R3E, T7S-R4E, T7S R5E, Willamette Meridian Clackamas County, Oregon Responsible Agency: USDI - Bureau of Land Management Responsible Official: Cindy Enstrom, Field Manager Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 315-5969 For further information, contact: Zachary Jarrett, Project Lead Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 375-5610 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/AE-11/021+1792 Molalla River-Table Rock Recreation Area Management Plan and DR July 2011 2 Table of Contents Interdisciplinary Team of Preparers ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nificant Natural Area Sites and Interconnections
    .~­ ". \ i' .- / ,.• --- ./ \. \ ~ • I. • h j . .LC .' \. \ \ '.', ."'- /_ ,I • ~, I • ,{ \ I j .' ,,'" "..', r -, " (. ) ./ ..~, / / --)" ( , / '- L • r-( ."• \ " • ." L •~ rr ('., r I" ~••. / r ~ ). ," , \ . ) / ) •. ~ \ '-: '.' / -' ", ,'; ---' -, ", - ( '..\~ , " ' '. ,J \. ) .~ .\ / -" ,e.' ·r ","." ~ METROPOLITAN - e> )~ .' \ I" e :\(?-reel1space~, :- J • 'f /' r: /. ..../ .J \ • ~.' / l .. 'v' /". • '> I / I e-, ~ ./ ,I \ • .>" ) Master-Piait ) e• .,/ r ", / Ij .'-..... L e "'" '. \ e ( r e /. e e, , --- '~. e j -.', ,.­ ;' r .. •er, ) r / -'. ~ \' - ( . ~ . ., ~ ~' -\ A Cooperative Regio!lal$ystem ofNa.tural Areas, "Open Space, T~f!:..ils a~¢ Gree.nways / /', ' '.)' " forWilcJlife and p,!ople . ./( . ./ ,... ' .... / r • '. X- •.\ / e ! -, "e- ( \ - '- '\ .J • r~gional go~ernmeht (As' ofJuly 1992) "- (. • Metro is the 'directly elected thatserves , .. ,/ Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington cOUlities andilie 24 Policy Advisory COn:'!m,ittee M,ember;s: • \'citiesThat make up the P~rtlana metropolita~;rea. " "'- Ri~hard Devlin, Metro councilor and chair •e- Metr~is ;~spon~ible f~r soli~:~aste management, op~ration/of Ruth~cFariana, Metro,co~n;ilor rmd vice-chair ,_ .i ,'-- M~tro us~ \, the Washington Park Zoo, transportation-and land Sandi Hansen/Metro councilor " "- ~" ' pl~nping, 1da~inerstad, commissi~ne~ urban growth boundary management, technical ." J Judie Clackamas County . ,. services to local go\\ernments and, 'through the Metropolitan Pauline Anderson, Multnomah County commissioner ) r·, ) : fxposition)Recre,ation Gommission,man~gementofthe
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Administrative Order
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ARCHIVES DIVISION SHEMIA FAGAN STEPHANIE CLARK SECRETARY OF STATE DIRECTOR CHERYL MYERS 800 SUMMER STREET NE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE SALEM, OR 97310 503-373-0701 PERMANENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FILED 06/25/2021 9:30 AM PRD 5-2021 ARCHIVES DIVISION CHAPTER 736 SECRETARY OF STATE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT & LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL FILING CAPTION: Adds Pilot Butte State Scenic Viewpoint Master Plan to list of adopted Master Plans EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/25/2021 AGENCY APPROVED DATE: 06/23/2021 CONTACT: Helena Kesch 725 Summer St NE Filed By: 503-881-4637 Salem,OR 97301 Helena Kesch [email protected] Rules Coordinator AMEND: 736-018-0045 RULE TITLE: Adopted State Park Master Plan Documents NOTICE FILED DATE: 03/16/2021 RULE SUMMARY: Adds Pilot Butte State Scenic Viewpoint Master Plan to list of adopted Master Plans RULE TEXT: (1) The following state park master plan documents have been adopted and incorporated by reference into this division: (a) Fort Stevens State Park Master Plan, as amended in 2001; (b) Cape Lookout State Park, amended in 2012 as Cape Lookout State Park Comprehensive Plan; (c) Cape Kiwanda State Park, renamed as Cape Kiwanda State Natural Area; (d) Nestucca Spit State Park, renamed as Robert Straub State Park; (e) Jessie M. Honeyman Memorial State Park as amended in 2009; (f) Columbia River Gorge Management Units Plan, including: Lewis and Clark State Recreation Site, Dabney State Recreation Area, Portland Womens' Forum State Scenic Viewpoint, Crown Point State Scenic Corridor, Guy W. Talbot State Park, George W. Joseph State Natural Area, Rooster Rock State Park, Shepperd's Dell State Natural Area, Bridal Veil Falls State Scenic Viewpoint, Dalton Point State Recreation Site, Benson State Recreation Area, Ainsworth State Park, McLoughlin State Natural Area, John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft North Cascade 2012 Implementation Plan
    North Cascade District Implementation Plan June 2012 Table of Contents Page Introduction ____________________________________________________________ 1 District Overview ________________________________________________________ 3 Land Ownership ______________________________________________________ 3 Forest Land Management Classification ____________________________________ 3 Background ________________________________________________________ 3 Major Change to FLMCS _____________________________________________ 4 Current Condition _____________________________________________________ 6 History ___________________________________________________________ 6 Physical Elements _____________________________________________________ 7 Geology and Soils ___________________________________________________ 7 Topography ________________________________________________________ 9 Water ____________________________________________________________ 9 Climate ___________________________________________________________ 9 Natural Disturbance _________________________________________________ 9 Biological Elements __________________________________________________ 10 Vegetation ________________________________________________________ 10 Forest Health _____________________________________________________ 11 Fish and Wildlife __________________________________________________ 11 Human Uses ________________________________________________________ 16 Forest Management ________________________________________________ 16 Roads ___________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination
    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Assessment and Strategic Action Plan – Willamette Basin Page I
    Natural Resource Assessment and Strategic Action Plan for Restoration and Stewardship of OPRD-Managed Properties in the Willamette Basin August 31, 2017 OPRD Natural Resource Assessment and Strategic Action Plan – Willamette Basin Page i Acknowledgements Project Manager: Andrea Berkley (OPRD Natural Resource Specialist, Valleys Region) Planning Consultant: Jeff Krueger (JK Environments) Project Ecologist: Bruce Newhouse (Salix Associates) Technical Advisory Pool: OPRD Project Advisory Team: • Jeff Baker (Greenbelt Land Trust) • Noel Bacheller, Botanist • Dan Bell (Bonneville Environmental Foundation) • Tammy Baumann, Visitor Experience Coordinator, Valleys Region • Jim Cathcart (W. Multnomah Soil and Water Conservation Dist.) • Alice Beals, Property Specialist • Holly Crosson (Benton Soil and Water Conservation District) • Vanessa Blackstone, Wildlife Biologist • Rebecca Currin (Institute for Applied Ecology) • Kammie Bunes, Property Specialist • Daniel Dietz (McKenzie River Trust) • Matthew Davey, Park Manager, Silver Falls Management Unit • Jason Dumont (Mosaic Ecology) • Steve DeGoey, Park Ranger, Southern Willamette MU • Andrew Dutterer (Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board) • Jennifer Godfrey, Interpretive Ranger, Detroit Lake MU • Sarah Dyrdahl (Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council) • Ross Kihs, South Central District Manager • John Goetz (Clean Water Services) • Steve Kruger, Park Ranger, Stub Stewart Management Unit • Nancy Gramlich (Oregon Department of Environmental Quality) • Celeste Lebo, Natural Resource Specialist, North
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography the Name “Molalla
    1 1. Santiam Molalla History, Culture, and Geography The name “Molalla” has at least 27 historical spellings. It is said to be derived from the words “moolek” for elk and “olilla” for berries (Winkler 1984). This would seemingly be a good name for their land, which produced abundant elk and berries, as well as for the people, who were known to extensively trade specialty products from these plants and animals. Preserved huckleberries and blackberries, elk hides, jerked meat, and elkhorn spoons were all trade goods associated with Molallans. Beargrass and willow weaving materials were also important trade items, due to their universal value and general abundance in Molalla lands. The Santiam Molalla were known as good elk hunters, good berry pickers, accomplished traders, bitter and fierce enemies of the Cayuse to the east, and good friends, family, and business associates with the Klamath to the south. They were also said to be poor guides when more than 35 miles from their homes, indicating a relatively concentrated and productive Tribal territory of seasonal use and trade route patterns (Minto 1903). Molallan Geography. Very little is known about the Molallan history or culture (Winkler 1984; Ruby and Brown 1986; Zenk and Rigsby 1998), but there is good agreement on early historical Molallan geography. During the 1750- 1850 late precontact/early historical time period of this study, Molallans occupied nearly the entire western slope of the Oregon Cascades Range, from the Columbia River south, almost to California. The Molalla are believed to have been organized into three, or possibly four, major “bands,” or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Clackamas County
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Clackamas County Community Community Name Number BARLOW, CITY OF 410013 CANBY, CITY OF 410014 DAMASCUS, CITY OF 410006 *ESTACADA, CITY OF 410016 GLADSTONE, CITY OF 410017 HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF 410026 *JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF 410267 LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF 410018 MILWAUKIE, CITY OF 410019 *MOLALLA, CITY OF 410020 OREGON CITY, CITY OF 410021 RIVERGROVE, CITY OF 410022 SANDY, CITY OF 410023 WEST LINN, CITY OF 410024 WILSONVILLE, CITY OF 410025 CLACKAMAS COUNTY 415588 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified REVISED: JANUARY 18, 2019 Reprinted with corrections on December 6, 2019 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41005CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide Effective Date: June 17, 2008 Revised Countywide Date: January 18, 2019 This FIS report was reissued on December 6, 2019 to make corrections; this version replaces any previous versions.
    [Show full text]