The Timing of Oligodendrocyte Cell Death Determines the Potential of Myelin Recovery During Brain Postnatal Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Timing of Oligodendrocyte Cell Death Determines the Potential of Myelin Recovery During Brain Postnatal Development The timing of oligodendrocyte cell death determines the potential of myelin recovery during brain postnatal development. Asghar Shabbir To cite this version: Asghar Shabbir. The timing of oligodendrocyte cell death determines the potential of myelin recovery during brain postnatal development.. Biochemistry, Molecular Biology. Université de Strasbourg, 2013. English. NNT : 2013STRAJ089. tel-01410528 HAL Id: tel-01410528 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01410528 Submitted on 6 Dec 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG ÉCOLE DOCTORALE 414 [Biopathologie de la Myéline, Neuroprotection et Stratégies Thérapeutiques INSERM U 1119] THÈSE présentée par : [ Asghar SHABBIR ] soutenue le : 1er Juillet 2013 pour obtenir le grade de : Docteur de l’u niversité de Strasbourg Discipline/ Spécialité : Neurosciences LE PROGRAMME D’INDUC TION DE LA MORT CELLULAIRE DES OLIGODENDROCYTES DETERMINE LE POTENTIEL DE REPA RATION DE LA MYÉLINE AU COURS DU DÉVELOPPEMENT THÈSE dirigée par : M. GHANDOUR Said (Directeur de recherche au CNRS, Université de Strasbourg) RAPPORTEURS : M. SCHUMACHER Michael (Directeur de recherche, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud) M. MASSAAD Charbel (Professeur, Université Paris Descartes) AUTRES MEMBRES DU JURY : Mme. BOEHM Nelly (Professeur, Université de Strasbourg) Examinateur M. MENSAH-NYAGAN Guy (Professeur, Université de Strasbourg) Membre invité I Dedicte this Humble Effort to my Parents and all the Family 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I feel enormous delight to convey my honest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Said GHANDOUR, for making it possible for me to work in such a prestigious scientific environment. He has been very supportive, encouraging and kind. I owe a great deal of appreciation for his valuable advice, constructive criticism and extensive discussions around my work. It has been a great honor to work under his supervision. I wish to express my cordial appreciation to the examiners, Dr. Michael SCHUMACHER and Prof. Charbel MASSAAD, Prof. Nelly BOEHM and Prof. Guy MENSAH-NYAGAN for the acceptance of being members of the examination committee. I feel immense pleasure to gratefully acknowledge to Prof. Guy MENSAH-NYAGAN, director of our present INSERM U 1119 laboratory and Dr. Christian KELCHE, director of the former laboratory and to all the members of the two laboratories. I am greatly thankful particularly to Elisabeth TRIFILIEFF, Jérôme DE SEZE, Jérôme STEIBEL , Gabrielle RUDOLF, Laurence MEYER, Christine PATTE-MENSAH, Brigitte SAMAMA, Cristina ANTAL, Nicolas COLLONGUES, Jean-Baptiste CHANSON and Susana BRUN and for their valuable suggestions as members of the laboratory. I extend my admiration and appreciation to Julien GRAFF, Dao LAM and Roland BURY for all their assistance and support. 3 No acknowledgment could ever adequately express my obligation and humble thanks to my Pakistani friends Ghulam HUSSAIN, Rizwan ASLAM, Sultan ALI, Adnan NIAZI, Azhar AYAZ, Rashad HUSSAIN, Nauman ZAHID, Sarfraz SHAFIQ and Muhammad AZEEM who always stood beside me in the hour of need. I am unable to find appropriate words to express my deep gratitude for Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, for providing me this opportunity to work in this reputed scientific community to learn and improve my scientific skills, knowledge and rational thinking. I am perpetually grateful to my beloved parents and all the family members for their unconditional love, loyalty, endurance, countless prayers and endless efforts . They have always been a source of inspiration for me. Asghar SHABBIR 4 Table of Contents Title Page No Aknowlegements 3 List of contents 5 List of figures 11 List of abbreviations 13 Résumé 16 Summary 25 I. Introduction 32 I-1 Central Nervous System (CNS) 33 1.1 Functions of CNS 33 1.1.1 Integration of information 33 1.1.2 Homeostasis 33 1.1.3 Mental Activity 33 1.1.4 Control of muscles and glands 34 1.2 Cells of CNS 34 1.2.1 Neurons 34 1.2.2 Neuroglia 34 1.2.2.1 History and discovery of Neuroglial cells 34 1.2.2.1.1 Pre-Cajalian period 35 1.2.2.1.2 Cajalian period 36 1.2.2.1.3 Post-Cajalian period 37 I-2 Astrocytes 39 2.1 Morphology 39 2.1.1 Fibrous and Protoplasmic astrocytes 39 2.1.2 Radial glia during development 40 2.2 Identification 41 2.3 General Functions of Astrocytes 41 2.3.1 Synapse transmission and neuron survival 41 2.3.2 Synapse stabilization and elimination 41 2.3.3 Blood brain barrier 42 2.3.4 Support 42 2.3.5 Astrocytes and inflammatory response 43 2.3.6 Astrocytes as energy regulators 43 2.4 Astrocytes and myelin 43 5 2.4.1 Role in myelination 44 2.4.2 Inhibition of remyelination 45 2.4.2.1 Formation of glial scar 45 2.4.2.2 Astrocytes prevent OPC migration and maturation 45 2.4.3 Protective effects of astrocytes that promote neuroprotection and 46 myelin repair 2.4.4 Release of extracellular matrix related Factors 46 2.4.5 Astrocyte-Derived Chemokines production 47 I-3 Microglia 49 3.1 Origin of microglia 49 3.2 Morphology 50 3.3 Identification 52 3.4 Activation of microglia 52 3.5 General functions of microglia 53 3.5.1 Regulators of CNS immunity 53 3.5.2 Maintenance of microenvironment 54 3.5.3 Cytotxic effects 54 3.5.4 Microglia and development 54 3.5.5 Neueroprotection 55 3.5.6 Housekeepers 55 3.5.7 Antigen presentation 55 3.5.8 Promotion of repair 55 3.6 Microglia and myelination 56 3.6.1 Interaction with oligodendrocytes 56 3.6.2 Microglial activation 56 3.6.3 T-cells infiltration 56 3.6.4 Microglia as macrophages 58 I-4 Oligodendrocytes 60 4.1 Oligodendrocyte morphology 60 4.2 Classification of oligodendrocytes 61 4.3 Origin and differentiation of Oligodendrocytes 62 4.3.1 Common precursors for neurons and glia: pluripotentiality of stem 64 cells 6 4.3.2 Oligodendrocyte precursors in the ventricular zone 65 4.3.3 Oligodendrocyte progenitors in the SVZ 66 4.4 Oligodendrocyte migration 68 4.5 Oligodendrocyte maturation 70 4.6 Factors necessary for oligodendrocyte maturation and survival 73 4.6.1 Growth Factors 74 4.6.1.1 Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) 74 4.6.1.2 Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) 74 4.6.1.3 Insulin-like growth factor I 75 4.6.1.4 Neurotrophin-3. (NT-3) 76 4.6.1.5 Glial growth factor (GGF) 76 4.6.1.5 Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) 76 4.6.1.6 Interleukin-6 and Interleukin 2 (IL-6, IL-2) 76 4.6.1.8 Transforming growth factor (TGF) 76 4.6.1.9 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) 77 4.6.1.10 Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) 77 4.6.1.11 Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1(FGFR1) 77 4.6.1.12 Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) 78 4.6.2 Other proteins and receptors 78 4.6.2.1 Poly Sialic Acid Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (PSA- 78 NCAM) 4.6.2.2 NG2 79 4.6.2.3 Erythropoietin 79 4.6.2.4 Glutamate and their receptors (NMDA) 80 4.6.2.5 Semaphorin 3F 80 4.6.2.6 Semaphorin 6A (Sema6A) 80 4.6.2.7 Sema4D 81 4.6.2.8 Cellular prion protein (PrPc) 81 4.6.2.9 Slit 2 81 4.6.3 Genes and Transcription factors 82 4.6.3.1 Sonic hedgehog 84 4.6.3.2 Transcription factors Olig1 and Olig2 84 4.6.3.2.1 Olig2 Phosphorylation 86 7 4.6.3.3 Sox 9 and 10 87 4.7 Markers of oligodendrocyte lineage 87 4.8 Functions of oligodendrocytes 89 4.10.1 Saltatory conduction 89 4.10.2 Source of CNS iron 90 4.10.3 Maintenance of functional structure 90 4.10.4 Axon survival 91 I-5 Myelin 92 5.1 Nodes of Ranvier 92 5.2 Myelin architecture 92 5.3 Myelin Biochemistry 93 5.3.1 Lipids 95 5.3.2 Proteins 96 5.3.2.1 Proteolipid protein (PLP). 97 5.3.2.2 Myelin basic proteins (MBP) 98 5.3.2.3 2′, 3′ -Cyclic nucleotide 3’ -phosphodiesterase (CNP) 99 5.3.2.4 Myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) 100 5.3.2.5 Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) 101 5.3.2.6 Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein (OMgp) 102 5.3.2.7 Paranodal proteins 102 5.3.3 Enzymes associated with myelin 103 5.4 Steps and timing of myelination 105 5.5 Myelin Function 106 5.5.1 Physiology 106 5.5.2 Pathophysiology 107 5.6 Myelin associated disorders 108 5.6.1 Multiple sclerosis (MS) 108 5.6.1.1 Types of MS 108 5.6.1.2 Factors involved in MS 110 5.6.1.3 Clinico-pathological characteristics of MS 111 5.6.2 Leukodystrophies 111 5.6.2.1 Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) 112 5.6.2.2 Globoid Cell Leukodystrophy (Krabbe’s Disease) 112 8 5.6.2.3 Metachromatic Leukodystrophy 112 5.6.2.4 Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease (PMD) 113 5.6.2.5 Alexander’s Disease 113 5.6.3 Demyelination and axonal injury 114 5.6.3.1 Axonal injury in multiple sclerosis 114 5.6.3.1.1 Early axonal transaction in brain MS lesions 115 5.6.3.1.2 Inflammation mediated axonal degeneration in MS 116 5.6.3.2 Axonal Damage in Leukodystrophies 117 5.6.3.2.1 X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy 117 5.6.3.2.2 Metachromatic leukodystrophy 117 5.6.3.2.3 Krabbe’s disease 117 5.6.3.2.4 Pelizaeus-Merzbacher 117 5.7 Therapeutic strategies to promote remyelination 118 5.7.1 Transplantation of exogenous cells 118 5.7.2 Promoting endogenous remyelination 119 5.7.2.1 Growth factors and related molecules 120 5.7.2.2 Hormones 122 I-6 Animal models of demyelination 124 6.1 Immune mediated mouse models 124 6.1.1 Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) 124 6.2 Virus-induced demyelinating disease
Recommended publications
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue Prof.Prof. ZhouZhou LiLi Dept.Dept. ofof HistologyHistology andand EmbryologyEmbryology Organization:Organization: neuronsneurons (nerve(nerve cells)cells) neuroglialneuroglial cellscells Function:Function: Ⅰ Neurons 1.1. structurestructure ofof neuronneuron somasoma neuriteneurite a.a. dendritedendrite b.b. axonaxon 1.11.1 somasoma (1)(1) nucleusnucleus LocatedLocated inin thethe centercenter ofof soma,soma, largelarge andand palepale--stainingstaining nucleusnucleus ProminentProminent nucleolusnucleolus (2)(2) cytoplasmcytoplasm (perikaryon)(perikaryon) a.a. NisslNissl bodybody b.b. neurofibrilneurofibril NisslNissl’’ss bodiesbodies LM:LM: basophilicbasophilic massmass oror granulesgranules Nissl’s Body (TEM) EMEM:: RERRER,, freefree RbRb FunctionFunction:: producingproducing thethe proteinprotein ofof neuronneuron structurestructure andand enzymeenzyme producingproducing thethe neurotransmitterneurotransmitter NeurofibrilNeurofibril thethe structurestructure LM:LM: EM:EM: NeurofilamentNeurofilament micmicrotubulerotubule FunctionFunction cytoskeleton,cytoskeleton, toto participateparticipate inin substancesubstance transporttransport LipofuscinLipofuscin (3)(3) CellCell membranemembrane excitableexcitable membranemembrane ,, receivingreceiving stimutation,stimutation, fromingfroming andand conductingconducting nervenerve impulesimpules neurite: 1.2 Dendrite dendritic spine spine apparatus Function: 1.3 Axon axon hillock, axon terminal, axolemma Axoplasm: microfilament, microtubules, neurofilament, mitochondria,
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue • Controls and integrates all body activities within limits that maintain life • Three basic functions – sensing changes with sensory receptors • fullness of stomach or sun on your face – interpreting and remembering those changes – reacting to those changes with effectors • muscular contractions • glandular secretions Major Structures of the Nervous System • Brain, cranial nerves, spinal cord, spinal nerves, ganglia, enteric plexuses and sensory receptors Organization of the Nervous System • CNS is brain and spinal cord • PNS is everything else Nervous System Divisions • Central nervous system (CNS) – consists of the brain and spinal cord • Peripheral nervous system (PNS) – consists of cranial and spinal nerves that contain both sensory and motor fibers – connects CNS to muscles, glands & all sensory receptors Subdivisions of the PNS • Somatic (voluntary) nervous system (SNS) – neurons from cutaneous and special sensory receptors to the CNS – motor neurons to skeletal muscle tissue • Autonomic (involuntary) nervous systems – sensory neurons from visceral organs to CNS – motor neurons to smooth & cardiac muscle and glands • sympathetic division (speeds up heart rate) • parasympathetic division (slow down heart rate) • Enteric nervous system (ENS) – involuntary sensory & motor neurons control GI tract – neurons function independently of ANS & CNS Neurons • Functional unit of nervous system • Have capacity to produce action potentials – electrical excitability • Cell body – single nucleus with prominent nucleolus – Nissl
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Oligodendrocytes from Adult Human CNS
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1992, 12(4): 1538-l 547 Pre-Oligodendrocytes from Adult Human CNS Regina C. Armstrong,lJ Henry H. Dorn, l,b Conrad V. Kufta,* Emily Friedman,3 and Monique E. Dubois-Dalcq’ ‘Laboratory of Viral and Molecular Pathogenesis, and %urgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-3246 CNS remyelination and functional recovery often occur after Rapid and efficient neurotransmission is dependent upon the experimental demyelination in adult rodents. This has been electrical insulating capacity of the myelin sheath around axons attributed to the ability of mature oligodendrocytes and/or (reviewed in Ritchie, 1984a,b). Nerve conduction is impaired their precursor cells to divide and regenerate in response after loss of the myelin sheath and results in severe neurological to signals in demyelinating lesions. To determine whether dysfunction in human demyelinating diseases such as multiple oligodendrocyte precursor cells exist in the adult human sclerosis (MS). Remyelination can occur in the CNS of MS CNS, we have cultured white matter from patients under- patients but appears to be limited (Perier and Gregoire, 1965; going partial temporal lobe resection for intractable epilep- Prineas et al., 1984). Studies of acute MS cases have revealed sy. These cultures contained a population of process-bear- that recent demyelinating lesions can exhibit remyelination that ing cells that expressed antigens recognized by the 04 appears to correlate with the generation of new oligodendrocytes monoclonal antibody, but these cells did not express galac- (Prineas et al., 1984; Raine et al., 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Reduction of Microglia Does Not Alter Axonal Injury in a Mouse Model of Repetitive Concussive Traumatic Brain Injury Rachel E
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Open Access Publications 2014 Acute reduction of microglia does not alter axonal injury in a mouse model of repetitive concussive traumatic brain injury Rachel E. Bennett Washington University School of Medicine David L. Brody Washington University School of Medicine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs Recommended Citation Bennett, Rachel E. and Brody, David L., ,"Acute reduction of microglia does not alter axonal injury in a mouse model of repetitive concussive traumatic brain injury." Journal of Neurotrauma.31,9. 1647-1663. (2014). https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/4711 This Open Access Publication is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA 31:1647–1663 (October 1, 2014) ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3320 Acute Reduction of Microglia Does Not Alter Axonal Injury in a Mouse Model of Repetitive Concussive Traumatic Brain Injury Rachel E. Bennett and David L. Brody Abstract The pathological processes that lead to long-term consequences of multiple concussions are unclear. Primary mechanical damage to axons during concussion is likely to contribute to dysfunction. Secondary damage has been hypothesized to be induced or exacerbated by inflammation. The main inflammatory cells in the brain are microglia, a type of macrophage. This research sought to determine the contribution of microglia to axon degeneration after repetitive closed-skull traumatic brain injury (rcTBI) using CD11b-TK (thymidine kinase) mice, a valganciclovir-inducible model of macrophage depletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Not Reached, However, Even After Six to Sevenhours. A
    PROTEIN SYNTHESIS IN THE ISOLATED GIANT AXON OF THE SQUID* BY A. GIUDITTA,t W.-D. DETTBARN,t AND MIROSLAv BRZIN§ MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, WOODS HOLE, MASSACHUSETTS Communicated by David Nachmansohn, February 2, 1968 The work of Weiss and his associates,1-3 and more recently of a number of other investigators,4- has established the occurrence of a flux of materials from the soma of neurons toward the peripheral regions of the axon. It has been postulated that this mechanism would account for the origin of most of the axonal protein, although the time required to cover the distance which separates some axonal tips from their cell bodies would impose severe delays.4 On the other hand, a number of observations7-9 have indicated the occurrence of local mechanisms of synthesis in peripheral axons, as suggested by the kinetics of appearance of individual proteins after axonal transection. In this paper we report the incorporation of radioactive amino acids into the protein fraction of the axoplasm and of the axonal envelope obtained from giant axons of the squid. These axons are isolated essentially free from small fibers and connective tissue, and pure samples of axoplasm may be obtained by extru- sion of the axon. Incorporation of amino acids into axonal protein has recently been reported using systems from mammals'0 and fish."I Materials and Methods.-Giant axons of Loligo pealii were dissected and freed from small fibers: they were tied at both ends. Incubations were carried out at 18-20° in sea water previously filtered through Millipore which contained 5 mM Tris pH 7.8 and 10 Muc/ml of a mixture of 15 C'4-labeled amino acids (New England Nuclear Co., Boston, Mass.).
    [Show full text]
  • (Caspr) and Contactin Form a Complex That Is Targeted to the Paranodal Junctions During Myelination
    The Journal of Neuroscience, November 15, 2000, 20(22):8354–8364 Contactin-Associated Protein (Caspr) and Contactin Form a Complex That Is Targeted to the Paranodal Junctions during Myelination Jose C. Rios,1 Carmen V. Melendez-Vasquez,1 Steven Einheber,1 Marc Lustig,2 Martin Grumet,2 John Hemperly,5 Elior Peles,6 and James L. Salzer1,3,4 Departments of 1Cell Biology, 2Pharmacology, 3Neurology, and the 4Kaplan Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, 5BD Technologies, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, and 6Department of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel Specialized paranodal junctions form between the axon and the associated specifically with Caspr in the paranodes, whereas a closely apposed paranodal loops of myelinating glia. They are higher-molecular-weight form of contactin, not associated with interposed between sodium channels at the nodes of Ranvier Caspr, is present in central nodes of Ranvier. These results and potassium channels in the juxtaparanodal regions; their suggest that the targeting of contactin to different axonal do- precise function and molecular composition have been elusive. mains may be determined, in part, via its association with Caspr. We previously reported that Caspr (contactin-associated protein) Treatment of myelinating cocultures of Schwann cells and neu- is a major axonal constituent of these junctions (Einheber et al., rons with RPTP␤–Fc, a soluble construct containing the carbonic 1997). We now report that contactin colocalizes and forms a cis anhydrase domain of the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase complex with Caspr in the paranodes and juxtamesaxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Nervous System and Nervous Tissue
    Fundamentals of Nervous System and Nervous Tissue Chapter 12 Nervous System The nervous system is the main system to communicate and coordinate body activities by sending electrical impulses. Nervous system forms a communication network in whole body. Endocrine system communicates through chemical messengers – hormones. 12 pairs of Cranial nerves arise from brain Brain (Part of PNS) Central NS 31 pairs of spinal nerves arise from spinal Spinal nerve cord nerve cord (Part of PNS) Somatic sensory Afferent Division Visceral sensory Peripheral NS Somatic NS Efferent Division Sympathetic Autonomic NS Parasympathetic Neuron A neuron has a cell body. Many smaller branched appendages are called Dendrites. Dendrites bring in information (nerve impulse) to the cell body. A single longer appendage is called Axon. It takes information away from cell body. It branches at the end into terminal knobs. A terminal knob secretes a chemical called Neurotransmitter in the gap to the next neuron or muscle membrane. 3-types of neurons (on basis of function) Specialized nerve cells are called Neurons. Sensory neurons bring information from sense organs like eyes to CNS. Sensory = Affrent. Somatic Sensory = coming from body wall - skin, muscles and joints; Visceral Sensroy = coming from internal organs - viscera Motor neurons take information from CNS to effectors like muscles or glands. Motor = Effrent. Somatic Motor – going to skeletal muscles and Visceral Motor – going to smooth or cardiac muscles. Inter-neurons receive information from sensory neurons and
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Introduction to the Nervous System and Nervous Tissue
    11 Introduction to the Nervous System and Nervous Tissue ou can’t turn on the television or radio, much less go online, without seeing some- 11.1 Overview of the Nervous thing to remind you of the nervous system. From advertisements for medications System 381 Yto treat depression and other psychiatric conditions to stories about celebrities and 11.2 Nervous Tissue 384 their battles with illegal drugs, information about the nervous system is everywhere in 11.3 Electrophysiology our popular culture. And there is good reason for this—the nervous system controls our of Neurons 393 perception and experience of the world. In addition, it directs voluntary movement, and 11.4 Neuronal Synapses 406 is the seat of our consciousness, personality, and learning and memory. Along with the 11.5 Neurotransmitters 413 endocrine system, the nervous system regulates many aspects of homeostasis, including 11.6 Functional Groups respiratory rate, blood pressure, body temperature, the sleep/wake cycle, and blood pH. of Neurons 417 In this chapter we introduce the multitasking nervous system and its basic functions and divisions. We then examine the structure and physiology of the main tissue of the nervous system: nervous tissue. As you read, notice that many of the same principles you discovered in the muscle tissue chapter (see Chapter 10) apply here as well. MODULE 11.1 Overview of the Nervous System Learning Outcomes 1. Describe the major functions of the nervous system. 2. Describe the structures and basic functions of each organ of the central and peripheral nervous systems. 3. Explain the major differences between the two functional divisions of the peripheral nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorsal Root Injury—A Model for Exploring Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury
    cells Review Dorsal Root Injury—A Model for Exploring Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury Håkan Aldskogius * and Elena N. Kozlova Laboratory of Regenertive Neurobiology, Biomedical Center, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Unraveling the cellular and molecular mechanisms of spinal cord injury is fundamental for our possibility to develop successful therapeutic approaches. These approaches need to address the issues of the emergence of a non-permissive environment for axonal growth in the spinal cord, in combination with a failure of injured neurons to mount an effective regeneration program. Experimental in vivo models are of critical importance for exploring the potential clinical relevance of mechanistic findings and therapeutic innovations. However, the highly complex organization of the spinal cord, comprising multiple types of neurons, which form local neural networks, as well as short and long-ranging ascending or descending pathways, complicates detailed dissection of mechanistic processes, as well as identification/verification of therapeutic targets. Inducing different types of dorsal root injury at specific proximo-distal locations provide opportunities to distinguish key components underlying spinal cord regeneration failure. Crushing or cutting the dorsal root allows detailed analysis of the regeneration program of the sensory neurons, as well as of the glial response at the dorsal root-spinal cord interface without direct trauma to the spinal cord. At the same time, a lesion at this interface creates a localized injury of the spinal cord itself, but with an initial Citation: Aldskogius, H.; Kozlova, neuronal injury affecting only the axons of dorsal root ganglion neurons, and still a glial cell response E.N.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Road Map”
    PRACTICAL ROADMAP NERVOUS TISSUE DR N GRAVETT NEURONS • MOTOR • SENSORY Anterior (ventral) horn Dorsal root of spinal of spinal cord cord Multipolar Pseudounipolar ANTERIOR HORN CELLS • Slide 64 Spinal Cord (vervet monkey) Stain: Kluver and Berrera Technique NOTE: with this technique, myelin stains dark blue and basophilic substances such as rER and nuclei stain violet. In this case we use “blue” and “purple” to describe the staining and not eosinophilic and basophilic. SPINAL CORD Anterior Ventral Horn Arachnoid Ventricle Pia Mater Grey Matter White Matter Posterior Horn Dura Mater Dorsal ANTERIOR HORN CELL Neuropil Cell Body Dendrite Vesicular Nucleus Nucleolus Nucleus of Nissl Bodies Neuroglial Cell ANTERIOR HORN CELL Neuropil Cell Body Vesicular Nucleus Nucleolus Nissl Body Nucleus of Neuroglial Cell Dendrite Nissl Body Axon Hillock Axon SPINAL (DORSAL ROOT) GANGLION CELLS • Slide 62 Spinal Ganglion Stain: H&E NOTE: The spinal ganglion is also known as the dorsal root ganglia and contains pseudounipolar neuron cell bodies. SPINAL (DORSAL ROOT) GANGLIA Cell Bodies Processes (Axons and Dendrites) SPINAL (DORSAL ROOT) GANGLIA Cell Bodies Processes (Axons and Dendrites) NOTE: The neuronal cell bodies of the dorsal root ganglia are “clumped” together, and one cannot see any processes entering or leaving the cell bodies. The processes (axons and dendrites) are seen towards the edge/periphery of the group of cell bodies. SPINAL (DORSAL ROOT) GANGLIA Satellite cells (arranged in ring like fashion around the cell body) Cell Body Nucleolus Vesicular Fine Granular Nucleus Nissl Substance Nucleus of Satellite cell PERIPHERAL BRANCH OF A SPINAL NERVE • Slide 32 Median Nerve Stain: Mallory’s Technique NOTE: Three dyes are used in Mallory’s technique, which results in collagen fibres (such as connective tissue) staining blue, the “neurokeratin” staining red, and nuclei staining reddish-orange PERIPHERAL NERVE Myelinated Axons Vein L.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 22 – Neuromuscular Physiology and Pharmacology J. A. Jeevendra Martyn
    Chapter 22 – Neuromuscular Physiology and Pharmacology J. A. Jeevendra Martyn The physiology of neuromuscular transmission could be analyzed and understood at the most simple level by using the classic model of nerve signaling to muscle through the acetylcholine receptor. The mammalian neuromuscular junction is the prototypical and most extensively studied synapse. Research has provided more detailed information on the processes that, within the classic scheme, can modify neurotransmission and response to drugs. One example of this is the role of qualitative or quantitative changes in acetylcholine receptors modifying neurotransmission and response to drugs.[1][2] In myasthenia gravis, for example, the decrease in acetylcholine receptors results in decreased efficiency of neurotransmission (and therefore muscle weakness)[3] and altered sensitivity to neuromuscular relaxants.[1][2] Another example is the importance of nerve-related (prejunctional) changes that alter neurotransmission and response to drugs.[1][4] At still another level is the evidence that muscle relaxants act in ways that are not encompassed by the classic scheme of unitary site of action. The observation that muscle relaxants can have prejunctional effects[5] or that some nondepolarizers can also have agonist-like stimulatory actions on the receptor[6] while others have effects not explainable by purely postsynaptic events[7] has provided new insights into some previously unexplained observations. Although this multifaceted action-response scheme makes the physiology and
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromuscular Junctions in the Body Wall Muscles of the Earthworm, Lumbricus Terrestris Linn
    J. Cell Set, 7, 263-271 (1970) 263 Printed in Great Britain NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTIONS IN THE BODY WALL MUSCLES OF THE EARTHWORM, LUMBRICUS TERRESTRIS LINN. P. J. MILL AND M. F. KNAPP Department of Zoology, University of Leeds, England SUMMARY The fine structure of the neuromuscular junctions in the body wall muscles of the earthworm 13 described. The segmental nerves send branches into the muscle layers. Axons in the nerve branches contain numerous synaptic vesicles and contact is established between these axons and muscle fibres or muscle tails; the latter may extend for a considerable distance from the muscle fibre. The cleft between the axolemma and sarcolemma is 85-120 nm wide and con- tains basement membrane material. At intervals small aggregations of electron-dense material are attached to the axonal membrane and synaptic vesicles are associated with these. The sarcolemma bears rather larger masses of dense material and is also specialized extracellularly. INTRODUCTION The earthworm's body wall muscles are innervated by the segmental nerves. There are about 300 motor fibres in the segmental nerves of a typical segment of the earth- worm Pherettma communissima (Ogawa, 1939); these innervate at least 120000 muscle fibres. The axons give off many branches to the muscles and their endings are den- dritic in form in fully grown worms but bud-like in young worms. According to Retzius (1892 a), finely branching motor fibres ramify in the muscles of Lumbricus, terminating as free endings which are like knotted threads in appearance. His figures indicate both multiterminal and polyneuronal innervation. Smallwood (1926) in an investigation of Lumbricus terrestris, noted that in addition to fine branching nerve fibres with knob-like endings, which he considered to be sensory, there is another type of ending characterized by a cluster of branches, but also with knob-like terminals; he thought that these were motor in function.
    [Show full text]