Occurrence of Brachyuran Larvae in the Surf Zone of Fukiage Beach, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan II. Families Leucosiidae, Xanthidae and Pinnotheridae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Occurrence of Brachyuran Larvae in the Surf Zone of Fukiage Beach, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan II. Families Leucosiidae, Xanthidae and Pinnotheridae Benthos Research, 46: 25-32, Mar., 1994 Occurrence of Brachyuran Larvae in the Surf Zone of Fukiage Beach, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan II. Families Leucosiidae, Xanthidae and Pinnotheridae MOHAMAD ISMID, HIROSHI SUZUKI and TOSHIO SAISHO Laboratory of Marine Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University Abstract ISMID, MOHAMAD, HIROSHI SUZUKI and TOSHIO SAISHO (Laboratory of Marine Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University). 1994. Occurrence of Brachyuran Larvae in the Surf Zone of Fukiage Beach, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan. II. Families Leucosiidae, Xanthidae and Pinnotheridae. Benthos Research, 46: 25-32. This paper considers Brachyuran larvae of the families Leucosiidae, Xanthidae and Pinnotheridae collected from the surf zone of Fukiage beach, Kagoshima Prefecture. Descriptions are given of zoea I of Ebalia sp., Xanthinae sp., Pilumnus sp., Pinnotheres pholadis, , and P. ? sinensis. Seasonal abundance of these zoeae throughout the 18-month study period showed high concentrations in the summer months (June to August) fol- lowed by a steady decline in autumn. The occurrence of only zoea I in the surf zone sug- gests that the larvae of these species are transient and not dependent on the surf zone for their development. Introduction Leucosiidae, Xanthidae and Pinnotheridae which inhabit throughout coastal and shallow In our previous paper (ISMIDet al., 1994), de- waters. scriptions and occurrence of grapsid and ocypodid larvae in the surf zone of Fukiage Materials and Methods beach, Kagoshima Prefecture were presented. This paper deals with larvae of other families, The methods for larval collections, data analysis, and details of study area are given in Received September 28,1992: Accepted June 25, 1993 our previous paper (ISMID et al., 1994). 25 No. 46 Benthos Research Mar., 1994 Fig. 1 Ebalia sp., (SZ-K6), zoea I. (a) lateral view; (b) abdomen and telson; (c) antenna. All scale bars represent 0.1mm. Descriptions previously described by AIKAWA(1937), RICE & WILLIAMSON(1977), SALMAN(1982), and QUINTANA All larval assignments are tentative and des- (1986). The absence of the carapace lateral and ignated with a letter and number following the dorsal spines are diagnostic of the sub-family prefix "SZ" (for surf zone). Ebaliinae, in which the characteristics were given as having either small carapace lateral spine, small lateral protuberances, or none at Leucosi idae all (RICE, 1980). On the basis of the absent cara- pace lateral spine, SZ-K6 zoea bears close re- Species SZ-K6, Ebalia sp. (Fig. 1) semblance with Ebalia nux A. MILNEEDWARDS Zoea I described by RICE& WILLIAMSON(1977). Dimensions: T.T 0.46m, R.L 0.10mm. Carapace: Smooth and globular with small Xanthidae rostral spine. Dorsal and lateral spines absent. Abdomen: 5 somites plus telson. Somites 2 and 3 Species SZ-X7, Xanthinae sp. (Fig. 2) with small lateral knobs. Zoea I Telson: Triangular flat plate with slightly con- Dimensions: T.T 1.31mm, D.L 0.51mm, R.L 0.46mm cave posterior margin and 3 pairs of serrated se- Carapace: Dorsal and rostral spines well- tae. developed and prominent. Lateral spines small Antenna: Small unarmed bud. and reduced. The reduced antenna and triangular flat Abdomen: 5 somites plus telson. Somites 2 and 3 plate telson fairly identify this zoea as a with small lateral knobs. leucosiid. Although much of the larval morphol- Telson: Bifurcate. Telsonal furca well- ogy of the Leucosiidae is still very poorly developed and armed with 1 dorsal and 2 lateral known, several accounts of this family have been (1 very small) spines. 3 pairs of serrated setae 26 Brachyuran larvae in the surf zone (II) Fig. 2 Xanthinae sp., (SZ-X7), zoea I. (a) leteral view; (b) abdomen and telson; (c) antenna . All scale bars represent 0.1mm. Fig. 3 Pilumnus sp., (SZ-G8), zoea I. (a) lateral view; (b) abdomen and telson; (c) antenna . All scale bars represent 0.1mm. on inner arch of telson separated by a wide and reduced with 1 terminal seta. shallow median cleft. Based on the general description of the Antenna: Well-developed protopod with 2 rows Xanthidae provided by RICE (1980), SZ-X7 zoea of spinules on distal surface and slightly longer possesses a combined characters of reduced than carapace rostral spine. Exopod small and carapace lateral spine, rudimentary antennal 27 No. 46 Benthos Research Mar., 1994 exopod, and outer spines on the telsonal furca spinulose, armed with 1 dorsal and 2 lateral (1 that are identifiable with a xanthid. However, it very small) spines. A row of spinules on inner is difficult to establish its position within the border of furca. 3 pairs of serrated setae on in- family mainly due to the wide variety of larval ner arch of telson separated by a deep median forms that exist within the Xanthidae. TERADA notch. (1990) divided xanthid subfamilies into 8 Antenna: Protopod slightly longer than cara- groups, based on the morphology of the an- pace rostral spine, and with 2 rows of spinules tenna, and provided a description key to several on distal surface. Exopod slightly longer than species of Japanese xanthid zoea. According to protopod, with spinules and 1 small seta this grouping SZ-X7 zoea is a Xanthinae. The medially. form of the carapace spines, antenna, and telson This zoea is clearly a xanthid, because the bears resemblance to those of Leptodius characteristics of the carapace spines, antenna exaratus H. MILNE EDWARDSand Cycloxanthops and telson match with the general features of the truncatus DE HAAN as described by SABA (1976) Xanthidae provided by RICE (1980). According and SUZUKI (1979), respectively. to the larval characteristics reported by TERADA (1990), it is possible to place SZ-G8 zoea within Species SZ-G8, Pilumnus sp. (Fig. 3) the Pilumnus. Several species of this genus have Zoea I been described by SANDIFER(1974), BOOKHOUT& Dimensions: T.T 1.14mm, D.L 0.44mm, R.L 0.35mm COSTLOW(1979), SALMAN (1982), and TERADA Carapace: Dorsal, rostral and lateral spines (1990). Having single seta on the antennal present. Dorsal and rostral spines well- exopod,this zoea differs from Pilumnus developed and prominent. vespertilio FABRICIUSand P. scabriusculus ADAM Abdomen: 5 somites plus telson. Somites 2 and 3 & WHITE, which have at least 2 setae on the with lateral knobs. exopod as described by TERADA (1990). Other Telson: Bifurcate. Telsonal furca long and zoea of this genus possessing a single seta on the Fig. 4 Pinnotheres ?pholadis, (SZ-F9), zoea I. (a) lateral view; (b) Abdomen and telson; (c) an- tenna. All scale bars represent 0.1mm. 28 Brachyuran larvae in the surf zone (II) antennal exopod are Pilumnus dasypodus SZ-F9. However, to date, there have been no re- KINGSLEYand P. inermis A. MILNE EDWARDS & port of P. pisum from Japan; thus,the zoea is BOUVIERdescribed by SANDIFER(1974) and RICE & assigned to P. pholadis. Albeit some minor WILLIAMSON(1977), respectively. variation in the length of the carapace, there is very little other difference between SZ-F9 zoea Pinnotheridae and P. pholadis described by MURAOKA (1979). Species SZ-F9, Pinnotheres ?pholadis DE HAAN, Species SZ-T10, Pinnotheres ?sinensis SHEN 1932 1935 (Fig. 4) (Fig. 5) Zoea I Zoea I Dimensions: T.T 0.40mm, R.L 0.14mm. Dimensions: T.T 0.35mm. Carapace: Rostral and lateral spines present Carapace: Smooth and globular. Dorsal, Lateral spine with slight downward curvature. rostral and lateral spines absent. Abdomen: 5 broad somites plus telson. Somite: Abdomen: 5 broad somites plus telson. Somites 2 and 3 with small lateral knobs. 2 and 3 with small lateral knobs. Telson: Trilobed flat plate extended from a Telson: Trilobed flat plate extended from a broad abdominal somite. 3 pairs of serrated se- broad abdominal somite. 3 pairs of serrated se- tae separated by a median lobe. Postero-lateral tae separated by a median lobe. Postero-lateral margin with 2 unequal small spines. margin with 2 small unequal spines. Antenna: Reduced to a small bud. Antenna: Reduced to a small bud with 1 small This zoea bears strong resemblance with medial seta. Pinnotheres pholadis described by MURAOKA This zoea resembles Pinnotheres ?pholadis (1979). The morphological features of (SZ-F9) in the telson but differs from it in lack- Pinnotheres pisum PENNANTdescribed by RICE ing carapace spines. The trilobed telson and re- (1975) also carries similar characteristics with duced antenna resemble strongly those of Fig. 5 Pinnotheres ?sinensis, (SZ-T10), zoea I. (a) lateral view; (b) abdomen and telson; (c) an- tenna. All scale bars represent 0.1mm. 29 No.46 Benthos Research Mar., 1994 Pinnotheres boniensis STIMPSON described by I, and appeared common in the surf zone dur- MURAOKA (1977) and Pinnotheres sinensis de- ing the summer months in both years. Some scribed by MURAOKA& KONISHI(1977). However, zoea also appeared during the winter; but they P. boniensis was described as having several were inconsistent, being recorded only in small distinct protuberances on the carapace, which number. differs from the smooth globular carapace of SZ Zoea of Ebalia sp. (SZ-K6) appeared in the -T10 zoea. Apparently the characteristics of the surf zone with maximum numbers in June in carapace are more closer to P. sinensis serve as both years at 30.0 larvae/m3 in 1990 and 25.8 lar- the basis for the assignment of SZ-T10 zoea. vae/m3 in 1991 (Fig. 6a). The earliest appear- Nevertheless, out of 9 Pinnotheres species known ance of this zoea in 1991 was recorded in small to occur in Japanese waters (SAKAI, 1976), only number of 10.0 larvae/m3 in May and continued 3 has so far been adequately described, includ- till August. However, the results of 1990 show ing P. pholadis reported by MURAOKA(1979). the zoea to have a prolonged appearance which lasted till October. Seasonal Abundance Zoea of Xanthinae sp.
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Occurrence of Some Poorly Known Decapoda (Crustacea) in the Southern North Sea
    NOTES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME POORLY KNOWN DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA by J. P. H M ADEMA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands F CREUTZBERG & G J VAN NOORT Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands With 9 text-figures, 6 tables, 5 maps INTRODUCTION Since April 1972 an ecological trawl-survey programme has been undertaken by the Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, in the southern North Sea with the R. V. "Aurelia". The main object is to obtain information on distribution, density, biomass and fluctuations of crawling or swimming demersal (epibenthic) fauna such as small fishes, shrimps, prawns, crabs, asteroids, ophiuroids and some gastropods, for the evaluation of the role of these carnivores in the benthic ecosystem of the southern North Sea. Sedimentological aspects of the area are described by Creutzberg & Postma (1979). Within the context of the present paper the most important feature is the mesh of 5 x 5 mm2 of the cod end of the 5V2 m beam-trawl used and the extensive area of 5000-10,000 m2 covered during each haul. These exceptional circumstances resulted into faunistically interesting catches which gave rise to a cooperation with taxonomic specialists of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie (RMNH), Leiden. The present paper deals with decapod crustaceans, collected during "Aurelia"-cruises, which are considered to be scarce or rare in the southern North Sea, completed with data from bottom-samples and other sources The species in question are: Pandalina brevirostris, Spirontocans lilljeborgii, Alpheus macrocheles, Pontophilus spinosus, Pontophilus bi.spino.sus, Galathea dispersa, Ebalia tubero.sa, Ebalia tumefacta, Ebalia cranchii, Atelecyclus rotundatus, Monodaeus couchii, Callianassa subterranea, Callianas.sa tyrrhena, Upogebia stellata and Upogebia deltaura Of the genus Macropodia a number of specimens have been collected, which partly were identified as M.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Keys for the Identi¢Cation of the Pleocyemata (Crustacea: Decapoda) Zoeal Stages, from the Coastal Region of South-Western Europe
    J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2004), 84, 205^227 Printed in the United Kingdom Illustrated keys for the identi¢cation of the Pleocyemata (Crustacea: Decapoda) zoeal stages, from the coastal region of south-western Europe Antonina dos Santos*P and Juan Ignacio Gonza¤ lez-GordilloO *Instituto de Investigac° a‹ o das Pescas e do Mar, Avenida de Brasilia s/n, 1449-006 Lisbon, Portugal. OCentro Andaluz de Ciencia y Tecnolog|¤a Marinas, Universidad de Ca¤ diz, Campus de Puerto Real, 11510öPuerto Real (Ca¤ diz), Spain. PCorresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] The identi¢cation keys of the zoeal stages of Pleocyemata decapod larvae from the coastal region of south-western Europe, based on both new and previously published descriptions and illustrations, are provided. The keys cover 127 taxa, most of them identi¢ed to genus and species level. These keys were mainly constructed upon external morphological characters, which are easy to observe under a stereo- microscope. Moreover, the presentation of detailed ¢gures allows a non-specialist to make identi¢cations more easily. INTRODUCTION nearby areas as a complement document when identifying larval stages. Identi¢cation of decapod larvae from plankton samples The order Decapoda comprises two suborders, the is not easy, principally because there are great morpholo- Dendrobranchiata and the Pleocyemata (Martin & Davis, gical changes between developmental phases, although less 2001). A key for the identi¢cation of Dendrobranchiata pronounced between larval stages. Moreover, larval larvae covering the same area of this study has been descriptions of many species are still unsuitable or even presented by dos Santos & Lindley (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Fig. 9. Leucosiidae. 1–4, Leucosia Spp., Right Chela, MFM142559; 2, Right
    65 Fig. 9. Leucosiidae. 1–4, Leucosia spp.,rightchela,MFM142559;2,rightchela,MFM142560;3,merusofchela,MFM14239 9; 4, female abdomen, MFM142561. 5, 6, Seulocia rhomboidalis (De Haan, 1841),carapace,5,MFM142562;6,MFM142563. 7, Leucosia anatum (Herbst, 1783),carapace,MFM142558.8–15, Urnalana haematosticta (Adams and White, 1849), 8, carapace, MFM142511; 9, ventral carapace, sternum, and abdomen, MFM142511; 10, carapace, MFM142511; 11, gonopod, MFM142511; 12, carapace, MFM142488; 13, carapace, MFM142556; 14, carapace, MFM142557; carapace and pereiopods, MFM 142489. Scale bar=5 mm. Fig. 9. 1–4, , ,MFM142559;2,,MFM142560;3,,MFM142399;4,, MFM142561. 5, 6, , , 5, MFM142562; 6, MFM142563). 7, , , MFM142558). 8–15, ,8,,MFM142511;9,,MFM142511;10,,MFM142511;11,,MFM142511;12,,MFM142488;13,, MFM142556; 14, ,MFM142557;, , ,MFM142489. 5mm. 66 ,1992 Superfamily Majoidea Samouelle, 1819 Family Epialtidae MacLeay, 1838 Subfamily Leucosiinae Samouelle, 1819 Subfamily Epialtinae MacLeay, 1838 Genus Leucosia Weber, 1875 Genus Pugettia Dana, 1851 Leucosia anatum Herbst, 1783 Pugettia sp. Fig. 9.7 Fig. 10.3 :5MFM142558 :2MFM142562 . Kato and Karasawa, 1998; 2001 Subfamily Pisinae Dana, 1851 Genus Hyastenus White, 1847 Leucosia spp. Fig. 9.1–9.4 Hyastenus sp. cfr. H . diacanthusDe Haan, 1835 :23MFM142399, 142559–142561 Fig. 10.4–10.7 :40MFM142563–142566 1994 Genus Seulocia Galil, 2005 Seulocia rhomboidalis De Haan, 1841 Family Inachidae MacLeay, 1838 Genus Achaeus Leach, 1817 Fig. 9.5, 9.6 :2MFM142562, 142563 Achaeus sp. cfr. A . japonicus De Haan, 1839 2 Galil2005Seulocia Fig. 10.8 :1MFM142567 Genus Urnalana Galil, 2005 1 Urnalana haematostictaAdams and White, 1849 Family Mithracidae MacLeay, 1838 Fig. 9.8–9.15 Genus Micippa Leach, 1817 :92MFM142488, 142489, 142511, 142516, 142556, 142557 Micippa thalia Herbst, 1803 Karasawa and Goda1996 Leucosia haematostica Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation to Monitor Georgia's Coastal Wetlands
    An Invitation to Monitor Georgia’s Coastal Wetlands www.shellfish.uga.edu By Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, & Ellie Covington First Printing 2003, Second Printing 2006, Copyright University of Georgia “This book was prepared by Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, and Ellie Covington under an award from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM and NOAA.” 2 Acknowledgements Funding for the development of the Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program was provided by a NOAA Coastal Incentive Grant, awarded under the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Zone Management Program (UGA Grant # 27 31 RE 337130). The Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program owes much of its success to the support, experience, and contributions of the following individuals: Dr. Randal Walker, Marie Scoggins, Dodie Thompson, Edith Schmidt, John Crawford, Dr. Mare Timmons, Marcy Mitchell, Pete Schlein, Sue Finkle, Jenny Makosky, Natasha Wampler, Molly Russell, Rebecca Green, and Jeanette Henderson (University of Georgia Marine Extension Service); Courtney Power (Chatham County Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission); Dr. Joe Richardson (Savannah State University); Dr. Chandra Franklin (Savannah State University); Dr. Dionne Hoskins (NOAA); Dr. Charles Belin (Armstrong Atlantic University); Dr. Merryl Alber (University of Georgia); (Dr. Mac Rawson (Georgia Sea Grant College Program); Harold Harbert, Kim Morris-Zarneke, and Michele Droszcz (Georgia Adopt-A-Stream); Dorset Hurley and Aimee Gaddis (Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve); Dr. Charra Sweeney-Reeves (All About Pets); Captain Judy Helmey (Miss Judy Charters); Jan Mackinnon and Jill Huntington (Georgia Department of Natural Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Oxyrhyncha a Natural Group?
    THALASSIA JUGOSLAVICA 17 (1) 1-16 (1981) 1 Review Paper Are the Oxyrhyncha a natural group? Z. $tevcic and R. H. Gore Center for Marine Research Rovinj, »Ruder Boskovic« Institute, 52210 Rovinj, Yugoslavia, and Smithsonian Institl/tion, Fort Pierce Bureau, Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450, U.S.A. Received August 7, 1981 The Oxyrhyncha (Crustacea Decapoda Brachyura) was estab­ lished by Latreille 1803 and considered until now as a natural group (taxon) by the majority of carcinologists. However, the number of families composing this group varied during this pe­ riod of time. According to present comprehension the Oxyrhyncha embrace the families Majidae, Parthenopidae, Hymenosomatidae, and perhaps also the newly described family Mimilambridae. A critical re·examination of morphological similarities shows that the previously held characters-in·common are not numerous, being more the consequence of convergent evolution than of common origin. Differences exist in a majority of features, especially in developmental and ecological ones. Therefore, the Oxyrhyncha have to be abandoned as a taxon and consequently families men­ tioned above should change their systematic status and position in the system of the brachyuran crabs. INTRODUCTION Brachyuran crabs in the section Oxyrhyncha have long been considered as a natural group by various carcinologists, and one in which the members ar..'! easily assignable to one of the three families, Majidae, Parthenopidae, or Hymenosomatidae, based on general morphological appearances. A forth fami­ ly, Mimilambridae, recently established by Williams1 for an unusual partheno­ pid-like crab from the lower eastern Caribbean Sea, also appears to have affini­ ties to the Oxyrhyncha_ The general morphological characters that typify oxyr­ hynchous crabs were perhaps best summarized in a key provided by Rathbun2 in which the couplet leading to Oxyrhyncha states that the forepart of the body is narrow, usually forming a distinct rostrum, the body is more or less triangular, and the orbits are generally incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • A Record of Arcania Brevifrons Chen, 1989 (Crustacea; Decapoda; Leucosiidae) from the Mediterranean Coast of Israel
    BioInvasions Records (2017) Volume 6, Issue 3: 249–253 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2017.6.3.10 © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Rapid Communication A record of Arcania brevifrons Chen, 1989 (Crustacea; Decapoda; Leucosiidae) from the Mediterranean coast of Israel Bella S. Galil1,*, Ya’arit Levitt-Barmats1,2, Hadas Lubinevsky3, Yana Yudkovsky3, Guy Paz3 and Baruch Rinkevich3 1The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Israel National Center for Biodiversity Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 2Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 3National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Research, POB 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 21 June 2017 / Accepted: 13 August 2017 / Published online: 18 August 2017 Handling editor: Stelios Katsanevakis Abstract Two adult specimens of Arcania brevifrons, a leucosiid crab native to the Indo-West Pacific Ocean, were recently collected off the southern Israeli coast, at the southeastern Mediterranean Sea. Molecular analyses based on the mitochondrial barcoding gene cytochrome oxidase sub unit I (COI) revealed two closely related haplotypes and suggest the species has entered the Mediterranean on at least two separate occasions. This is the fourth Erythraean leucosiid species recorded in the Mediterranean Sea. The presence of an ovigerous female may indicate the existence of an established population. Key words: Erythraean invasion, Mediterranean, Suez Canal, Red Sea, non-indigenous species, barcoding A. brevifrons Chen, 1989, A. erinacea (Fabricius, Introduction 1787), A. gracilis Henderson, 1893, A. septemspinosa (Fabricius, 1787) and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Brachyura: Leucosiidae
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 116(2):395-422. 2003. Four new genera of leucosiid crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Leucosiidae) for three new species and nine species previously in the genus Randallia Stimpson, 1857, with a redescription of the type species, R. ornata (Randall, 1939) Bella S. Galil National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, P.O.B. 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—A study of the leucosiid genus Randallia Stimpson, 1857, led to the description of four new genera: Tanaoa, for R. distincta Rathbun, 1893, R. pustulosa Wood-Mason, in Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891, and a new species, T. nanus; Tokoyo for R. eburnea Alcock, 1896, and a new species, T. cirrata; Toru for R. granuloides Sakai, 1961, R. trituberculata Sakai, 1961, R. pila Tan, 1996, R. mesjatzevi Zarenkov, 1990, and a new species, T. septimus\ and Ur- ashima, for R. lamellidentata Wood-Mason, 1892, and R. pustuloides Sakai, 1961. Randallia is restricted to its type species, R. ornata (Randall, 1839), and provisionally 12 other species currently placed in this genus pending further revision. All new genera are diagnosed and species assigned to them described or redescribed and illustrated; extended synonymies are given, and a key for species identification is provided. The type species, R. ornata, is redescribed. The genus Randallia Stimpson 1857a the National Museum of Natural History, was established for Ilia ornata Randall, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 1839, a leucosiid crab known from the Pa- together with other major collections has cific and Gulf coasts of California (Stimp- enabled re-examination of many type spec- son, 1857a).
    [Show full text]
  • Crab Biodiversity from Arukkattuthurai to Pasipattinam, South East Coast of India
    676Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences INDIAN J MAR SCI VOL 43(4), APRIL 2014 Vol. 43(4), April 2014, pp. 676-698 Crab biodiversity from Arukkattuthurai to Pasipattinam, south east coast of India D. Varadharajan & P. Soundarapandian Faculty of Marine Sciences, Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, Parangipettai-608 502, Tamil Nadu, India. [E-Mail: [email protected]] Received 30 July 2012; revised 14 January 2013 Coastal environment provides a greater range of habitats and thus potentially supports greater biodiversity. Before starting to produce seeds in a hatchery and culture them in ponds, thorough knowledge about their distribution in nature is important. So the present study is aimed to know the biodiversity of crabs from Arukkattuthurai to Pasipattinam. Totally 79 individual crab species were recorded belonging to 21 families from all 10 stations. Maximum crab species were recorded belonging to the family Portunidae than others families and also the maximum number of crab species 163 were recorded in Mallipattinam (station5) and minimum 69 species in Pasipattinam (station10). Occurrence of crab species in different stations were in the following order; Mallipattinam (163) > Sethubavachatram (161) > Manamelkudi (127) > Pointcalimere (117) > Muthupettai (116) > Jegathapattinam (110) > Kattumavadi (101) > Arukkattuthurai (92) > Adirampattinam (85) > Pasipattinam (69). Crabs were collected plenty during summer and monsoon than pre-monsoon and post-monsoon. The crabs belonging to families viz., Calappidae, Portunidae, Potamidae, Grapsidae, Sesarmidae and Ocypodidae were obtained almost all seasons. [Keywords: Crabs, Family, Portunidae, Distribution, Abundance] Introduction introduction are identified as main threat to 9 Biodiversity is important for human survival and biodiversity . India, a mega biodiversity country, economic interests and for the environmental purpose definitely needs conservation strategy to save the and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Thalassinidea, Anomura and Brachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda
    Deep-sea Fauna and Pollutants off Pacifi c Coast of Northern Japan, edited by T. Fujita, National Museum of Nature and Science Monographs, No. 39, pp. 581-613, 2009 Thalassinidea, Anomura and Brachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda) from Northeastern Japan Collected during the “Research on Deep-sea Fauna and Pollutants off Pacifi c Coast of Northern Japan” Project Hironori Komatsu1 and Tomoyuki Komai2 1 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3̶23̶1 Hyakunincho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169̶0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, 955̶2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260̶8682 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Reptantian decapod crustaceans (Thalassinidea, Anomura and Brachyura) from off the Pacifi c coast of northeastern Japan, collected during a four-year project of the National Museum of Nature and Science, “Research on Deep-sea Fauna and Pollutants off Pacifi c Coast of Northern Japan,” are reported. The collection consists of 26 species of 12 families. A new species of ethusid crab, Ethusina wakataka, is described and il- lustrated based on a male specimen from off Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, at depths of 1466̶1471 m. The new species can be distinguished from the known congeners primarily by the unique structure of the gonopods. The biogeography and the bathymetric distribution of the recorded species are briefl y discussed. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Thalassinidea, Anomura, Brachyura, deep-sea, new species, Ethusina wakataka. Introduction Little has been published on the deep-water reptant decapods of the Pacifi c coast of northeast- ern Japan, although the area represents a major North Pacifi c fi shing ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapoda (Crustacea) of the Gulf of Mexico, with Comments on the Amphionidacea
    •59 Decapoda (Crustacea) of the Gulf of Mexico, with Comments on the Amphionidacea Darryl L. Felder, Fernando Álvarez, Joseph W. Goy, and Rafael Lemaitre The decapod crustaceans are primarily marine in terms of abundance and diversity, although they include a variety of well- known freshwater and even some semiterrestrial forms. Some species move between marine and freshwater environments, and large populations thrive in oligohaline estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico (GMx). Yet the group also ranges in abundance onto continental shelves, slopes, and even the deepest basin floors in this and other ocean envi- ronments. Especially diverse are the decapod crustacean assemblages of tropical shallow waters, including those of seagrass beds, shell or rubble substrates, and hard sub- strates such as coral reefs. They may live burrowed within varied substrates, wander over the surfaces, or live in some Decapoda. After Faxon 1895. special association with diverse bottom features and host biota. Yet others specialize in exploiting the water column ment in the closely related order Euphausiacea, treated in a itself. Commonly known as the shrimps, hermit crabs, separate chapter of this volume, in which the overall body mole crabs, porcelain crabs, squat lobsters, mud shrimps, plan is otherwise also very shrimplike and all 8 pairs of lobsters, crayfish, and true crabs, this group encompasses thoracic legs are pretty much alike in general shape. It also a number of familiar large or commercially important differs from a peculiar arrangement in the monospecific species, though these are markedly outnumbered by small order Amphionidacea, in which an expanded, semimem- cryptic forms. branous carapace extends to totally enclose the compara- The name “deca- poda” (= 10 legs) originates from the tively small thoracic legs, but one of several features sepa- usually conspicuously differentiated posteriormost 5 pairs rating this group from decapods (Williamson 1973).
    [Show full text]