DOCSLIB.ORG

Reagan Follows Carter in Support for the Fundamentalist Mullahs of Iran

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reagan Follows Carter in Support for the Fundamentalist Mullahs of Iran Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 8, Number 37, September 22, 1981 Reagan follows Carter in support for the fundamentalist mullahs of Iran by Robert Dreyfuss. Middle East Editor At the beginning of the Carter administrati<?n in 1977, Iranian President Mohammed Ali Rajai and Prime Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Cyrus Vance Minister Javad Bahonar, Soviet President Brezhnev decided to support "Islamic fundamentalism" as a "bul� telegraphed his personal condolences to the Ayatollah wark against Communism." Because of the overall U.S. Khomeini. Moscow had equitable relations with the late strategic weakness in what Brzezinski called the "arc of Shah's regime, and has no love for Khomeini's insane crisis," where the Soviet Union had the overwhelming mullahs. The Brezhnev telegram was a signal that the military superiority it would soon demonstrate in Af­ Soviet Union has substantial assets inside Iran that it ghanistan, the Carter administration deluded itself into will not easily give up. believing that a system of conservative regimes dominat­ The Soviet newspaper Trud reported on the same ed by the clergy of the Muslim Brotherhood Islamic cults day as Brezhnev's telegram that the U.S. CIA was in the region from North Africa to Pakistan would responsible for the bombing campaign against Iran's strengthen Anglo-American influence. mullahs. The assassination of Rajai and Bahonar, said Carter's policy has failed. But now, less than a year Trud, occurred "where it would be hard to stage the into the Reagan administration, the United States is bombing without the necessary equipment and prepa­ again trying to implement it. ration," and noted that the people who carried off the Prominent Reagan advisers once criticized Carter bombing were CIA-connected agents of the Shah's old and Co. for supporting Khomeini. The very same Rea­ secret police who went underground with the Khomeini gan advisers are now arguing that American support for revolt and "now emerged with arms when their bosses the "Islamic Republic" is required to halt the Soviet across the ocean ordered it." advance in the region. Some opponents of the "Muslim The Soviet news agency TASS, however, reported card," such as former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia sharp criticisms of the Khomeini regime for its econom­ Robert Neumann, have even been summarily dismissed ic policy, demanding that the regime take action to from their posts by Secretary of State Alexander Haig. "raise the standard of living." Because such criticisms This is occurring in a context of renewed tension in of Khomeini's regime are rare in the Soviet press, it is the Middle East and South Asian region. Because of the clear that the Soviets-like the Americans-are prepar­ deterioration in East-West relations, following the neu­ ing for the succession fight in Iran. tron-bomb decision by Washington, the NATO contro­ More overt pressure was placed on Iran by Moscow versies over the placement of Pershing missiles in Europe, through Afghanistan. Repeated Soviet broadcasts and and Haig's support for anti-Soviet crusades in the Car­ propaganda about Iran have sharply warned the Irani­ ibbean, southern Africa, and Lebanon, the U.S.S.R. is ans not to interfere in Afghanistan by supporting the once again putting pressure on Pakistan politically and rebels there. militarily. The Soviet Union and its Eastern European allies have at the same time intensified a pattern of closer Strategic reality of Iran economic cooperation with Khomeini's Iran. Many of Under the direction of British agencies-including Iran's factories and economic installations have now the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), the teams been taken over by economic advisers from Poland, of British Orientalists and Iran specialists, and the Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany, North Ko­ Anglican Church executive and its Freemasonic branch­ rea, and other communist states. Ahmed Azizi, one of es in the Middle East-the United States and other the leading Iranian economic officials, noted this trend Western powers are assembling a new government for when he said in August that Iran "finds it easier to deal Iran. Before examining these plans, let us consider first with the Soviet bloc" in trade and economic coopera­ the role of the Soviet Union" in Iran. tion. Within hours after the bombing last week that killed Inside Iranian society, especially in the north, the 38 International EIR September 22,1981 © 1981 EIR News Service Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission strictly prohibited. Soviet KGB has established a host of secret agents, one that can achieve stability, because of Khomeini's according to Iranian sources. The Moscow-controlled presence." Tudeh communist party, in particular, controls impor­ tant sections of the Iranian media, especially the radio­ Future scenarios television company, and has considerable influence in In this context, let us consider the future of Iran as Iran's crucial oil fields. This range of Soviet influence, viewed by Anglo-American intelligence. combined with the pressure that Moscow is able to exert From 1979, London and Washington were commit­ on neighboring states, gives the Soviets effective veto ted to support the rise to power of the Muslim Brother­ power over the course of developments in Iran. hood in Iran. By the summer of 1981, however, it had become apparent that the experiment had failed, that The myth of 'strategic consensus' the mullahs could not withstand a concerted campaign What is the case for Iran is also the case for the of pressure by the U.S.S.R., and that the darlings of the entire Middle East. Because of the preponderance of Carter administration and the British SIS-like ex-Pres­ Soviet power in the arc of crisis, most of the region's ident Bani-Sadr and Admiral Ahmed Madani-had states are unwilling to link up with Alexander Haig's been ousted by the fanatical, power-hungry tyrants pro-NATO alliance. from the Islamic RepUblican Party mafia. In a recent interview in the New York Times, Haig Since June 1981, therefore, the British and the outlined his policy: "What I'm saying is that the envi­ Americans have sponsored a systematic campaign of ronment has changed. When I went to the Middle East bombings inside Iran directed against the leadership of in April-May, you will recall my talking about a strateg­ the IRP. These bombings have been carried out by ic consensus. Whether that's the right terminology for experienced officers of the old Savak and Iran's former the phenomenon is less important than the fact that Imperial Guard, in coordination with exiled Iranian there is such a consensus. officers in Europe and elsewhere. According to some "I wasn't talking about creating one," said Haig. "I sources, Gen. Hossein Fardoust, the ex-deputy Director kept hitting that as we went around. I was talking about of Savak who betrayed the Shah to aid the Khomeini the fact that one was emerging historically, and it was a revolution, was involved in recent bombings. product of post-<;::amp David events. The first question to be answered is: will the British "What am I speaking of? I'm speaking of the allow Khomeini himself to survive, or will they opt for collapse of the Shah of Iran, of the Iran-Iraq conflict, "Khomeiniism without Khomeini"? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the dynamics of the William Beeman of Brown University has recently Horn of Africa and the two Y emens." indicated that Khomeini might be worth more dead The reality of Haig's situation is far different from than alive. "His death could elevate the very notion of the secretary's implication that Washington is on the inevitable struggle between religious and secular forces verge of consolidating its strategic alliance, which one in Iran into a permanent feature of Iranian politics, analyst recently called a "flight of fancy" on Haig's perpetuating itself for years to come," Beeman wrote. part. In fact, the events cited by Haig have caused Saudi Khomeini's death, he added, would lead to an "endless Arabia, Jordan, and other countries to be more, rather civil war" that would "poison the future for genera­ than less cautious about ratifying the Haig "consensus." tions." In Iran, the entire spectrum of political forces has Khomeini himself may not relish the idea of becom­ virtually broken with the Khomeini regime. But the ing a dead symbol. After the bombing of Rajai's office, State Department continues to issue public support for Khomeini met with a delegation of so-called moderate the mullahs. Behind the scenes, the United States and mullahs, who reportedly suggested that, in order to stay the British are reportedly scrambling for some means to alive. Khomeini ease the campaign of repression and re­ maintain Khomeini as the "only" alternative to the strain the constant executions by the "Islamic courts." Soviet Union's seizing control of Iran, while at the same From Paris, ex-President Bani-Sadr offered an olive time looking for some replacement coalition. branch to Khomeini; he said that several times upposi­ The sharpest statement of Reagan's sudden open tion groups had asked Bani-Sadr if they should kill support for Khomeini came in the New York Post on Khomeini, and he had advised them not to do so. And Sept. 1. Citing State Department sources, the Post Ayatollah Shareatmadari has been telling Khomeini to reported that "there is a growing feeling among govern­ try to make a deal with Iran's armed forces. ment analysts, academics, and even some ex-hostages On Sept. 9. however, Khomeini delivered a speech that the survival and stability of Ayatollah Khomeini's that indicates that he has rejected the offer of the revolution may be in the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Strategic Policy and Iranian Political Development 1943-1979
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1985 American strategic policy and Iranian political development 1943-1979 Mohsen Shabdar The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Shabdar, Mohsen, "American strategic policy and Iranian political development 1943-1979" (1985). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5189. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5189 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished manuscript in which copyright sub ­ s is t s , Any further r epr in tin g of it s contents must be approved BY THE AUTHOR, Man sfield L ibrary Un iv e r s it y of Montana Date : •*' 1 8 AMERICAN STRATEGIC POLICY AND IRANIAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT 1943-1979 By Mohsen Shabdar B.A., Rocky Mountain College, 1983 Presented in partial fu lfillm e n t of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1985 Approved by: ‘ Chairman, Board of Examir\efs Dean, Graduate School UMI Number: EP40653 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • History Brief: Timeline of US-Iran Relations Until the Obama
    MIT International Review | web.mit.edu/mitir 1 of 5 HISTORY BRIEF: TIMELINE OF US‐IRAN RELATIONS UNTIL THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION Key Facts & Catalysts By Sam Sasan Shoamanesh Looking back at key events in this US‐Iran chronicle is helpful in understanding some of the traditional causes of friction and mistrust between Tehran and Washington. A reference to the annals of US‐Iran relations will also be valuable in appreciating that the policies of the past sixty years have not been advantageous to US interests and on the contrary, have resulted in blowbacks, which still vex the relations to this day. 1856: Genesis of Formal Relations | Diplomatic relations between Iran and the United States began in 1856. 1909: American Lafayette in Iran | In 1909, Howard Baskerville, an American teacher and Princeton graduate on a Presbyterian mission in Tabriz, Iran, instantly becomes an Iranian national hero where after joining the Constitutionalists during the Constitutional Revolution of 1905‐1911, loses his young life while fighting the Royalists and the forces of the Qajar king, Mohmmad Ali Shah’s elite Cossack brigade. He is remembered as saying: ʺ[t]he only difference between me and these people is my place of birth, and this is not a big difference.ʺ To this day he is revered by Iranians. Second World War | Until the second World War, the US had no interest or an active policy vis‐à‐vis Iran and relations remained cordial. 1953 C.I.A. Coup | In 1951, Prime Minister Mossadegh and his National Front party (“Jebhe Melli”), a socio‐democratic, liberal‐secular nationalist party in Iran, nationalize the country’s oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Amembassy TEHRAN SUBJECT
    AIRGRAM Department of State A-151 TO: Department of State FROM: AmEmbassy TEHRAN DATE: September 9, 1972 SUBJECT: Journalist Argues that Unchecked SAVAK Power Constitutes Long Term Danger to Iranian Regime REF: Tehran 4789 SUMMARY Associated Press correspondent in Iran, Parviz Raein, cites the mistreatment by SAVAK (The Iranian Security and Information Organization) of a prominent Iranian citizen and SAVAK's mis- handling of student protests over increased bus fares in Tehran two years ago as examples of unchecked power by the Iranian security authorities that, in his view, create opposition rather than dispose of it. Raein charges that SAVAK Chief, General Nematollah Nassiri, has become extremely corrupt and that Iranian officials, even those very close to the Shah, are afraid to cross the Intelligence Organization. Raein professed to be personally worried, as were many of his friends, about what the future holds for Iran unless the power of Iran's security apparatus is checked. During a recent call by the reporting officer on Associated Press Iran representative, Parviz Raein (protect), the subject of urban terrorism came up. Whereupon Raein launched into a dissertation, the central theme of which was that SAVAK itself is primarily responsible for the phenomenon. Raein said he was not attempting to deny that there were basic tensions and strains in present day Iranian society on which terrorists might feed. Rather, he was arguing that over reaction and inflexibility by SAVAK constituted the critical spark that had led to violence. Raein continued that with a terrorist incident, such as a bombing or shooting, occurring almost every day in Tehran, it was hard to remember that there was no real terrorism in Iran before the summer of 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Iran Under the Shah
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 7 1980 Human Rights in Iran under the Shah Richard W. Cottam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard W. Cottam, Human Rights in Iran under the Shah, 12 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 121 (1980) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol12/iss1/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Volume 12, Number 1, Winter 1980 COMMENT Human Rights in Iran Under the Shah by Professor Richard W. Cottam* I. INTRODUCTION FOR ANY ADVOCATE of human rights, the events surrounding the Iranian revolution must be a source of continuing agony. But for any- one interested in gaining a sharper understanding of some of the basic issues concerning human rights, the dramatic developments in Iran should be highly instructive. The early summary executions in Iran and the later public trials conducted by revolutionary Islamic courts were properly condemned by western human rights advocates as failing to ap- proach the requirements of due process. Yet the great majority of those who were tried and executed were charged with terrible violations of the most elemental human rights; and the testimony of the accused, so rich in detail and so internally consistent as to be credible,1 tends to confirm the worst charges against the Shah's regime.
    [Show full text]
  • US Covert Operations Toward Iran, February-November 1979
    This article was downloaded by: [Tulane University] On: 05 January 2015, At: 09:36 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Middle Eastern Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fmes20 US Covert Operations toward Iran, February–November 1979: Was the CIA Trying to Overthrow the Islamic Regime? Mark Gasiorowski Published online: 01 Aug 2014. Click for updates To cite this article: Mark Gasiorowski (2015) US Covert Operations toward Iran, February–November 1979: Was the CIA Trying to Overthrow the Islamic Regime?, Middle Eastern Studies, 51:1, 115-135, DOI: 10.1080/00263206.2014.938643 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2014.938643 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Espionage in the United States and the Anti-SAVAK Campaign (1970-1979)
    The Shah’s “Fatherly Eye” Iranian Espionage in the United States and the Anti-SAVAK Campaign (1970-1979) Eitan Meisels Undergraduate Senior Thesis Department of History Columbia University 13 April 2020 Thesis Instructor: Elisheva Carlebach Second Reader: Paul Chamberlin Meisels 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Historiography, Sources, and Methods ......................................................................................... 12 Chapter 1: Roots of the Anti-SAVAK Campaign ......................................................................... 14 Domestic Unrest in Iran ............................................................................................................ 14 What Did SAVAK Aim to Accomplish? .................................................................................. 19 Chapter 2: The First Phase of the Anti-SAVAK Campaign (1970-1974) .................................... 21 Federal Suspicions Stir ............................................................................................................. 21 Counterintelligence to Campaign ............................................................................................. 24 Chapter 3: The Anti-SAVAK Campaign Expands (1975-1976) .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Khomeini's Theory of Islamic State and the Making of the Iranian
    Khomeini's Theory of Islamic State and the Making of the Iranian Revolution 1 Mehdi Shadmehr2 1I wish to thank Hassan Ansari, Charles Cameron, Jose Cheibub, Amaney Jamal, Ali Kadivar, Mehran Kamrava, Charles Kurzman, Paulina Marek, Charles Ragin, Kris Ramsay and seminar par- ticipants at the University of Rochester and the University of South Carolina, and MPSA Conference for helpful suggestions and comments. 2Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: (305) 747-5896. Abstract The Iranian Revolution is one of the most influential events of the late twentieth century, with far-reaching consequences that still echo through the rise of Islamic state. Drawing from both primary (interviews, autobiographies, documents, and data) and secondary sources, the paper shows that Khomeini's the doctrine of the Guardianship of the Jurist played a decisive role in the making of the Iranian Revolution by changing the goals and strategies of the religious opposition from reforming government policies to establishing an Islamic state. Khomeini's doctrine was first published in 1970 in his treatise, Islamic State. The paper argues that Khomeini's ideological innovation can account for the sharp contrast between the outcomes of widespread protests in the early 1960s and the late 1970s: they both shook the Pahlavi regime, but the former protests dissipated, while the latter culminated in the Iranian Revolution. Expanding the scope beyond Iran and Islam, the paper explores the role of ideological innovations in the Russian and American Revolutions, and discusses the potentially critical role of ideological innovations in democracy movements in Islamic countries. The revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations..
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity Despite Revolution: Iran's Support for Non-State Actors
    Crown Family Director Professor of the Practice in Politics Gary Samore Continuity Despite Revolution: Iran’s Director for Research Charles (Corky) Goodman Professor Support for Non-State Actors of Middle East History Naghmeh Sohrabi Associate Director Mohammad Ataie Kristina Cherniahivsky Associate Director for Research he Islamic Republic of Iran supports a number of David Siddhartha Patel Tnon-state actors throughout the Middle East, such as Myra and Robert Kraft Professor Hizbollah in Lebanon and elements of the Iraqi Popular of Arab Politics Eva Bellin Mobilization Forces (al-Hashd al-Sha‘bi). Iranian leaders Founding Director describe their support for such groups in religious and Professor of Politics Shai Feldman revolutionary terms and as resistance against “global arrogance” (Istikbar-i Jahani), meaning imperialism. This aspect Henry J. Leir Professor of the Economics of the Middle East of Iran’s foreign policy, therefore, is widely understood to be a Nader Habibi product of the 1978–79 Iranian Revolution and as motivated, Renée and Lester Crown Professor in large part, by ideology. of Modern Middle East Studies Pascal Menoret In contrast, this Brief argues that Iran’s pattern of support for non-state Founding Senior Fellows entities after 1979, shaped around the so-called Axis of Resistance, is a Abdel Monem Said Aly Khalil Shikaki continuation of a regional policy that dates to the late 1950s and continued through the 1960s and 1970s. Both Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and the Goldman Faculty Leave Fellow Andrew March leaders of the Islamic Republic pursued a strategy of backing extraterritorial groups and invoking historical and religious ties to Shi‘i communities Harold Grinspoon Junior Research Fellow in the region to counter perceived threats and contain adversaries.
    [Show full text]
  • History Scholarship Exam 2018 : Sources Booklet
    History Scholarship Exam 2018 : Sources Booklet The Fall of the Shah and the Iranian Revolution Study the introduction and the sources carefully, and then answer all the questions. Introduction Mohammad Reza Pahlavi ruled Iran between 1941 and 1979. His title was Shah, an Iranian word which means king. In the mid-1970s there was widespread opposition to the rule of the Shah from within Iran and there were many different reasons for this opposition. Some Iranians perceived the Shah as being too pro-western and felt that he was an America “puppet”. Others saw his rule as undemocratic, oppressive and disliked the activities of his secret police, the Savak. A number of Iranians opposed the Shah on the grounds of corruption; many of the Shah’s followers were very wealthy and seemed to have enriched themselves at the expense of the Iranian people. Whilst there were different strands of opposition, the most prominent centred around Ayatollah Khomeini, an Iranian Islamic religious leader, who was in exile in France in the 1970s. By 1979 opposition to the Shah was so widespread that he felt unable to control the country and went into exile. Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Iran and took power, thus completing the Iranian revolution. The Shah died in America shortly after the revolution. The Islamic system that Ayatollah Khomeini created in Iran has survived until this day. Source A “Although Iran, also called Persia, was the world's oldest empire, dating back 2,500 years, by 1900 it was floundering. Bandits dominated the land; literacy was one percent; and women, under archaic Islamic dictates, had no rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi and Ayatollah Khomeini: in Light of Shi'i History
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1986 Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi and Ayatollah Khomeini: in Light of Shi'i History Brigitte U. Neary College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons, Islamic Studies Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Neary, Brigitte U., "Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi and Ayatollah Khomeini: in Light of Shi'i History" (1986). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625376. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-0f6r-pf24 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHAH MOHAMMED REZA PAHLAVI AND AYATOLLAH KHOMEINI IN LIGHT OF SHI'I HISTORY A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Brigitte U. Neary 1986 ProQuest Number: 10627875 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10627875 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Study
    SOURCES OF STUDY BOOKS PUBLISHED IN PERSIAN LANGUAGE Agheli, Bagher, Roozshomar tarikh’e Iran, az moshrouteh ta enqelab eslami [Chronology of Iran, 1896–1979]. 2 vols. Tehran: Namak, 1387/2008. Agheli, Bagher, sharh’e hal’e rejal’e siasi va nezami’e Iran [A comprehensive bio- graphical dictionary of contemporary Iranian political and military personali- ties]. 3 vols. Tehran: Goftar, 1380/2001. Ahmadi, Hamid, Tahqiqi darbareh’e tarikh’e enqelab’e Iran [An essay on the his- tory of the Iranian revolution]. Frankfurt: Enqelah Eslami Zeitung, 1380/2001. Alikhani, Alinaghi, ed., yaddashthay’e Alam [Alam diaries]. 6 vols. Tehran: Maziar- Moin, 2001. Alikhani, Alinaghi, ed., yaddashthay’e Alam [Alam diaries]. 6 vols. Bethesda, MD: Ibex, 2008. Alikhani, Reza, Shariati va Savak [Shariati and the SAVAK]. Tehran: Kavir, 1382/2003. Amini, Iraj, bar bal’e bohran, zendegi siasi Ali Amini [Political biography of Ali Amini]. Tehran: Mahi, 1386/2007. Araghi, Mehdi, nā’gofteh’hā; khāterāt’e Shahid Hāj Mehdi Arāghi [The untold memoirs of Haj Mehdi Araqi]. Tehran: Rasa, 1370/1991. Bakhtiar, Shapour, Si’ o haft rooz pas az si’o haft sal [Thirty-seven days after thirty- seven years]. Iran: Entesharat’e Radio, 1982. Bani-Sadr, Abolhassan, Dars’e Tajrobeh [Lessons drawn from experience], in con- versation with Hamid Ahmadi. Frankfurt: Englelab Eslami Zeitung, 2001. Bani-Sadr, Abolhassan, Khianat be Omid [The betrayal of hope]. Paris, 1982. © The Author(s) 2019 407 D. Bayandor, The Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the United States, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96119-4 408 SOURCES OF STUDY Bazargan, Mehdi, enqelab Iran dar do harakat [The revolution in two move- ments].
    [Show full text]
  • Interview: Iran's Aryana Seeks Exile Unity
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 7, Number 38, September 30, 1980 Succinctly, General Aryana outlined the means by which the Muslim Brotherhood and the freemasonic cult Exclusive interview of British intelligence installed the Khomeini mullahs in Iran. Most Iranians, in fact, who have positions of authority in Iran are quite familiar with the role of the British freemasons in Iran since the 19th century, when Iran's Aryana the top British secret agent Jamal ad-Din aI-Afghani organized the first real "pan-Islamic " movement. The seeks exile unity present Khomeini regime is merely an appendage of that long-standing apparatus. by Robert Dreyfuss Who is Aryana? Certainly, General Aryana has the credentials to be "They want to turn our country into a silent and cold an authority on the question of Iranian politics. Until cemetery, a backward society, as in the era of the Djahi­ ten years ago, when he resigned and left Iran in the liyya, the Age of Ignorance before the arrival of Islam." aftermath of a dispute with the shah, Aryana was the The quotation is taken from the manifesto of Gen. No. 1 military officer in Iran and commander of the Bahram Aryana, former Supreme Commander of the shah's entire armed forces. Today, he is the highest­ Imperial Iranian Armed Forces, who despite his 74 years ranking officer still living, far outranking General Ov­ of age is trying to forge a unified movement out of the eissi and others in the exile movement. Although until many competing groups of Iranian exiles opposed to the now he has not taken a very active role in the opposition fascist regime of the Ayatollah Khomeini.
    [Show full text]