Role of Roads and Water Control Structures on Polder Water Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
11815651 14.Pdf
KHULNA LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ROAD DISTRICT : KHULNA EARTHEN BC BRICK PVT. RIGID PVT. ROAD TYPE NUMBER OF TOTAL SURFACE TYPE-WISE BREAKE-UP CONDITION OF BC & RIGID PVT. ROAD STRUCTURE EXISTING GAP ROAD LENGTH (Km) (As of December, 2003) (Km) (Km) EARTHEN FLEXIBLE BRICK RIGID GOOD FAIR POOR BAD NUMBER SPAN NUMBER SPAN PAVEMENT PAVEMENT PAVEMENT (m) (m) (BC) (WBM/HBB/ (CC/RCC) BFS) Upazila Road 77 755 263 254 238 0 141 82 17 14 975 2860 66 2719 Union Road 88 484 220 97 168 0 50 32 9 6 528 1458 61 1499 Village Road-A 513 1525 1040 133 352 0 94 22 11 5 1152 1693 231 2028 Village Road-B 972 1565 1436 8 121 1 9 0 0 0 224 766 272 1087 TOTAL 1650 4330 2959 491 879 1 294 136 37 25 2879 6777 630 7333 2476 141 473 1 103 22 11 5 Length of Total Road Network Length of Total Road Network under Condition of BC & Rigid Pavement under different Categories different Surface Categories of Total Road Network 17% 8% 5% 0.0% 37% 20.3% 11% 28% 1.3% 59% 35% 68.3% Upazila Road Union Road Village Road-A Village Road-B EARTHEN BC BRICK PVT. RIGID PVT. GOOD FAIR POOR BAD Different Surface Categories and Condition of Different Surface Categories and Condition of BC & Rigid Pavement under Upazila Road BC & Rigid Pavement under Union Road 800 600 700 500 600 400 500 Total Length Total Length Earthen Earthen Brick Pvt. Brick Pvt. -
The Nexus Between Socio-Ecological System, Livelihood Resilience, and Migration Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh
sustainability Article The Nexus between Socio-Ecological System, Livelihood Resilience, and Migration Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh Bishawjit Mallick Chair of Environmental Development and Risk Management, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany; [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +49-351-463-42590 Received: 19 May 2019; Accepted: 7 June 2019; Published: 17 June 2019 Abstract: This research aims to ascertain how, and to what extent, livelihood resilience influences migration decisions (to migrate or not to migrate) of people who live in vulnerable socio-ecological systems (SESs). To do so, first, the characteristics of different SESs are determined; secondly, livelihood resilience across the SESs are analysed; and finally, the influence of livelihood resilience on the ‘migration decision’ (i.e., to migrate or not to migrate) is explained. The explanation of migration is based on the patterns, location, purpose, scope, and extent of migration. This paper addresses these issues based on empirical evidence from five rural coastal communities in Bangladesh. Findings show that resilient people would like to stay put and the decision differs across SESs, for example, the majority of people living in salt-shrimp-dependent SESs intended to migrate in the future, whereas the majority of people living in rain-fed agriculture-dependent SESs preferred to not migrate. Thus, the ability to migrate is therefore not only dependent on economic capability but also on the socio-ecological context of the place in which people live. Keywords: socio-ecological system (SES); livelihood resilience; migration decisions; (Non)Migration; Bangladesh 1. Introduction A Socio-Ecological System (SES) is a system that can be defined at several spatial, temporal, and organizational scales and which may be hierarchically linked [1,2]. -
TR 16-B Field Trip Reports from 2014
Blue Gold Program Technical Report No. 16 - B Field Trip Reports from 2014 Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Dhaka Bangladesh Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) May 2015 Technical Report 16 Field Trip Reports from 2014 Date : 05/05/2015 Blue Gold Program address client in style ~DocClientAddress (Arial 8) Mott MacDonald, Amsterdamseweg 15, 6814 CM Arnhem, Postbus 441, 6800 AK, Arnhem, Nederland T +31 (0)26 3577 111 F +31 (0)26 3577 577 W www.mottmac.com Green corner – Save a tree today! Mott MacDonald is committed to integrating sustainability into our operational practices and culture. As a world leading consultancy business we are always seeking to improve our own performance and reduce the environmental impact of our business. Meanwhile, many of our staff are committed to living sustainably in their personal lives – as an employee-owned company Mott MacDonald shares their concerns. We feel an ethical obligation to reduce our emissions and resource use and have committed to reducing our per capita carbon footprint by a minimum of 5% year on year. We print our reports and client submissions using recycled, double-sided paper. Compared to printing single sided on A4 virgin paper, double sided printing on recycled paper saves the equivalent of two trees, over a ton of CO2 and a cubic metre of landfill space for every 100 reams. By choosing the greener path we have been able to achieve efficiencies benefiting both Mott MacDonald and our customers. We would like to share some of the principles of our own ‗Going Green‘ initiative: • When possible we scan rather than print and consider what really needs to be on paper • We use electronic faxing when practicable • We work on e-forms • We use recycled paper when possible and print on both sides • Reducing paper in the office creates a better working environment for our staff and our clients We believe that you, as one of our esteemed clients, will share our concern to conserve precious resources for the benefit of our planet and its inhabitants. -