The Menzel Symposium on Solar Physics, Atomic Spectra, and Gaseous Nebulae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2p300278 No online items Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Processed by Ronald S. Brashear; machine-readable finding aid created by Gabriela A. Montoya Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague 1 Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Paper, 1940-1973 The Huntington Library San Marino, California Contact Information Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 Processed by: Ronald S. Brashear Encoded by: Gabriela A. Montoya © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, Date (inclusive): 1940-1973 Creator: Bowen, Ira Sprague Extent: Approximately 29,000 pieces in 88 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library San Marino, California 91108 Language: English. Provenance Placed on permanent deposit in the Huntington Library by the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection. This was done in 1989 as part of a letter of agreement (dated November 5, 1987) between the Huntington and the Carnegie Observatories. The papers have yet to be officially accessioned. Cataloging of the papers was completed in 1989 prior to their transfer to the Huntington. -
National States and International Science: a Comparative History of International Science Congresses in Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia, and Cold War United States
National States and International Science: A Comparative History of International Science Congresses in Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia, and Cold War United States Osiris 2005 Doel, Ronald E. Department of History (and Department of Geosciences), Oregon State University Originally published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society and can be found at: http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=osiris Citation: Doel, R. E. (2005). National states and international science; A comparative history of international science congresses in Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia, and Cold War United States. Osiris, 20, 49-76. Available from JSTOR website: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3655251 National States and International Science: A ComparativeHistory of International Science Congresses in Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia, and Cold WarUnited States Ronald E. Doel, Dieter Hoffmann, and Nikolai Krementsov* ABSTRACT Priorstudies of modem scientificinternationalism have been writtenprimarily from the point of view of scientists, with little regardto the influenceof the state. This studyexamines the state'srole in internationalscientific relations. States sometimes encouragedscientific internationalism;in the mid-twentiethcentury, they often sought to restrictit. The presentstudy examines state involvementin international scientific congresses, the primaryintersection between the national and interna- tional dimensionsof scientists'activities. Here we examine three comparativein- stancesin which such -
Planetary Nebulae
Planetary Nebulae A planetary nebula is a kind of emission nebula consisting of an expanding, glowing shell of ionized gas ejected from old red giant stars late in their lives. The term "planetary nebula" is a misnomer that originated in the 1780s with astronomer William Herschel because when viewed through his telescope, these objects appeared to him to resemble the rounded shapes of planets. Herschel's name for these objects was popularly adopted and has not been changed. They are a relatively short-lived phenomenon, lasting a few tens of thousands of years, compared to a typical stellar lifetime of several billion years. The mechanism for formation of most planetary nebulae is thought to be the following: at the end of the star's life, during the red giant phase, the outer layers of the star are expelled by strong stellar winds. Eventually, after most of the red giant's atmosphere is dissipated, the exposed hot, luminous core emits ultraviolet radiation to ionize the ejected outer layers of the star. Absorbed ultraviolet light energizes the shell of nebulous gas around the central star, appearing as a bright colored planetary nebula at several discrete visible wavelengths. Planetary nebulae may play a crucial role in the chemical evolution of the Milky Way, returning material to the interstellar medium from stars where elements, the products of nucleosynthesis (such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and neon), have been created. Planetary nebulae are also observed in more distant galaxies, yielding useful information about their chemical abundances. In recent years, Hubble Space Telescope images have revealed many planetary nebulae to have extremely complex and varied morphologies. -
A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short). -
By SUSAN PATRICIA WORSWICK, B.Sc., A.R.C.S
ASTRONOMICAL ELECTRONOGRAPHIC PHOTOMETRY by SUSAN PATRICIA WORSWICK, B.Sc., A.R.C.S. March 1975 • A thesis submitted for the degree Astronomy Group of Doctor of Philosophy of the Physics Department University of London and for Imperial College the Diploma of Imperial College. London S.W.7. ii ABSTRACT An outline is given of the various systems that have been developed for the production and reduction of electronographic exposures. The typical limits to photometric accuracy are discussed. The performance of the individual constituents of a particular system consisting of a Spectracon image tube, nuclear emulsion and Joyce-Loebl MkIII CS microdensitometer is described. The problems of mounting the image tube on a telescope are discussed and are illustrated by a description of a camera design for the Cassegrain focus of the 60-inch reflector at Boyden Observatory. The computing procedures followed for the extraction of morphological and photometric data are given and are illustrated by some of the data produced so far. The need for monochromatic photometry of planetary nebulae is outlined and the suitability of electronography is shown by preliminary results from an ongoing observation programme. The problem of the removal of photocathode non-uniformities is tackled and the limitations set by this procedure are discussed together with the implications for astronomical photometry. Some improvements are proposed which might be made to existing systems and which should be considered in setting up new equipment. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my thanks to Professor J. Ring for his supervision and his continued interest in this work. I am also grateful for the help extended by many members of the Astronomy Group, both past and present, in particular Dr C.I. -
Contributions to Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Astrophysics
October 28, 2009 13:56 WSPC - Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in chapter˙r3 3 THE TRANSITION FROM MATHEMATICIAN TO ASTROPHYSICIST M. R. FLANNERY School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0430, USA E-mail: r.fl[email protected] www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/rflannery.html Various landmarks in the evolution of Alexander Dalgarno from a gifted math- ematician to becoming the acknowledged Father of Molecular Astrophysics are noted. His researches in basic atomic and molecular physics, aeronomy (the study of the upper atmosphere) and astrophysics are highlighted. Keywords: atomic and molecular physics, aeronomy, astrophysics, Dalgarno- Lewis method, associative detachment, rotational excitation. 1. Some Distinct Landmarks As this “Dalgarno Celebratory Symposium” in honor of Alex Dalgarno’s 80th birthday continues, I would like to welcome you all to this morning’s session “Calculation of Atomic and Molecular Properties ”. This title is par- ticularly well suited to Alex’s philosophy because, in a recent reminiscence1 of his career, he mentions that, “ ... It is often said, by theorists, that physics is embodied in its equations, but I think it is to be found in the solutions to the equations”. And so, emboldened/accelerated by this realization, Alex embarked on making landmark advances in all of the following subjects: (1) Atomic and Molecular Structure (perturbation variational and expan- sion methods) (2) Interactions (polarization, dispersion, model, pseudo and long-range potentials) and (3) Collisions (near-resonant electronic transfer, excitation and charge transfer radiative transitions, rotational and vibrational excitation in molecules, spin-exchange). PROCEEDINGS OF THE DALGARNO CELEBRATORY SYMPOSIUM Contributions to Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Astrophysics, and Atmospheric Physics © Imperial College Press http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/p675.html October 28, 2009 13:56 WSPC - Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in chapter˙r3 4 to be covered today by this title. -
Arxiv:1211.4061V3 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 8 Feb 2013
From cosmic ray physics to cosmic ray astronomy: Bruno Rossi and the opening of new windows on the universe Luisa Bonolis Via Cavalese 13 – 00135 Rome, Italy [email protected] Abstract Bruno Rossi is considered one of the fathers of modern physics, being also a pioneer in virtually every aspect of what is today called high-energy astrophysics. At the beginning of 1930s he was the pioneer of cosmic ray research in Italy, and, as one of the leading actors in the study of the nature and behavior of the cosmic radiation, he witnessed the birth of particle physics and was one of the main investigators in this fields for many years. While cosmic ray physics moved more and more towards astrophysics, Rossi continued to be one of the inspirers of this line of research. When outer space became a reality, he did not hesitate to leap into this new scientific dimension. Rossi’s intuition on the importance of exploiting new technological windows to look at the universe with new eyes, is a fundamental key to understand the profound unity which guided his scientific research path up to its culminating moments at the beginning of 1960s, when his group at MIT performed the first in situ measurements of the density, speed and direction of the solar wind at the boundary of Earth’s magnetosphere, and when he promoted the search for extra-solar sources of X rays. A visionary idea which eventually led to the breakthrough experiment which discovered Scorpius X-1 in 1962, and inaugurated X-ray astronomy. -
MESSIER 15 RA(2000) : 21H 29M 58S DEC(2000): +12° 10'
MESSIER 15 RA(2000) : 21h 29m 58s DEC(2000): +12° 10’ 01” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Globular Cluster CONSTELLATION: Pegasus BEST VIEW: Late October DISCOVERY: Jean-Dominique Maraldi, 1746 DISTANCE: 33,600 ly DIAMETER: 175 ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +6.2 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 18’ FOV:Starry 1.00Night FOV: 60.00 Vulpecula Sagitta Pegasus NGC 7009 (THE SATURN NEBULA) Delphinus NGC 7009 RA(2000) : 21h 04m 10.8s DEC(2000): -11° 21’ 48.6” Equuleus Pisces Aquila NGC 7009 FOV: 5.00 Aquarius Telrad Capricornus Sagittarius Cetus Piscis Austrinus NGC 7009 Microscopium BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Planetary Nebula CONSTELLATION: Aquarius Sculptor BEST VIEW: Early November DISCOVERY: William Herschel, 1782 DISTANCE: 2000 - 4000 ly DIAMETER: 0.4 - 0.8 ly Grus APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +8.0 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 41” x 35” Telescopium Telrad Indus NGC 7662 (THE BLUE SNOWBALL) RA(2000) : 23h 25m 53.6s DEC(2000): +42° 32’ 06” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Planetary Nebula CONSTELLATION: Andromeda BEST VIEW: Late November DISCOVERY: William Herschel, 1784 DISTANCE: 1800 – 6400 ly DIAMETER: 0.3 – 1.1 ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +8.6 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 37” MESSIER 52 RA(2000) : 23h 24m 48s DEC(2000): +61° 35’ 36” BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Open Cluster CONSTELLATION: Cassiopeia BEST VIEW: December DISCOVERY: Charles Messier, 1774 DISTANCE: ~5000 ly DIAMETER: 19 ly APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +7.3 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 13’ AGE: 50 million years FOV:Starry 1.00Night FOV: 60.00 Auriga Cepheus Andromeda MESSIER 31 (THE ANDROMEDA GALAXY) M 31 RA(2000) : 00h 42m 44.3Cassiopeias DEC(2000): +41° 16’ 07.5” Perseus Lacerta AndromedaM 31 FOV: 5.00 Telrad Triangulum Taurus Orion Aries Andromeda M 31 Pegasus Pisces BASIC INFORMATION OBJECT TYPE: Galaxy CONSTELLATION: Andromeda Telrad BEST VIEW: December DISCOVERY: Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi, 964 Eridanus CetusDISTANCE: 2.5 million ly DIAMETER: ~250,000 ly* APPARENT MAGNITUDE: +3.4 APPARENT DIMENSIONS: 178’ x 63’ (3° x 1°) *This value represents the total diameter of the disk, based on multi-wavelength measurements. -
Jewish Behavior During the Holocaust
VICTIMS’ POLITICS: JEWISH BEHAVIOR DURING THE HOLOCAUST by Evgeny Finkel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 07/12/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Yoshiko M. Herrera, Associate Professor, Political Science Scott G. Gehlbach, Professor, Political Science Andrew Kydd, Associate Professor, Political Science Nadav G. Shelef, Assistant Professor, Political Science Scott Straus, Professor, International Studies © Copyright by Evgeny Finkel 2012 All Rights Reserved i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation could not have been written without the encouragement, support and help of many people to whom I am grateful and feel intellectually, personally, and emotionally indebted. Throughout the whole period of my graduate studies Yoshiko Herrera has been the advisor most comparativists can only dream of. Her endless enthusiasm for this project, razor- sharp comments, constant encouragement to think broadly, theoretically, and not to fear uncharted grounds were exactly what I needed. Nadav Shelef has been extremely generous with his time, support, advice, and encouragement since my first day in graduate school. I always knew that a couple of hours after I sent him a chapter, there would be a detailed, careful, thoughtful, constructive, and critical (when needed) reaction to it waiting in my inbox. This awareness has made the process of writing a dissertation much less frustrating then it could have been. In the future, if I am able to do for my students even a half of what Nadav has done for me, I will consider myself an excellent teacher and mentor. -
SAC's 110 Best of the NGC
SAC's 110 Best of the NGC by Paul Dickson Version: 1.4 | March 26, 1997 Copyright °c 1996, by Paul Dickson. All rights reserved If you purchased this book from Paul Dickson directly, please ignore this form. I already have most of this information. Why Should You Register This Book? Please register your copy of this book. I have done two book, SAC's 110 Best of the NGC and the Messier Logbook. In the works for late 1997 is a four volume set for the Herschel 400. q I am a beginner and I bought this book to get start with deep-sky observing. q I am an intermediate observer. I bought this book to observe these objects again. q I am an advance observer. I bought this book to add to my collect and/or re-observe these objects again. The book I'm registering is: q SAC's 110 Best of the NGC q Messier Logbook q I would like to purchase a copy of Herschel 400 book when it becomes available. Club Name: __________________________________________ Your Name: __________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________ City: __________________ State: ____ Zip Code: _________ Mail this to: or E-mail it to: Paul Dickson 7714 N 36th Ave [email protected] Phoenix, AZ 85051-6401 After Observing the Messier Catalog, Try this Observing List: SAC's 110 Best of the NGC [email protected] http://www.seds.org/pub/info/newsletters/sacnews/html/sac.110.best.ngc.html SAC's 110 Best of the NGC is an observing list of some of the best objects after those in the Messier Catalog. -
Astronomical Distance Scales in the Gaia Era
Astronomical distance scales in the Gaia era F. Mignard1 Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire de la C^oted'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange Bd de l'Observatoire, CS 34229, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France Abstract Overview of the determination of astronomical distances from a metrological standpoint. Distances are considered from the Solar System (planetary dis- tances) to extragalactic distances, with a special emphasis on the fundamental step of the trigonometric stellar distances and the giant leap recently experi- enced in this field thanks to the ESA space astrometry missions Hipparcos and Gaia. 1. Introduction For centuries astronomers had to content themselves with a 2-dimensional world with virtually no access to the depth of the Universe. The world unfolded before their eyes as though everything was taking place on the surface of a spherical envelope with few exceptions for the nearest sources, such as the Moon whose nearness was made obvious from its repeated passages before the Sun (solar eclipses), the planets or the stars (occultations). The size of this sphere was arbitrary and could not be gauged, let alone the idea that the stars could lie at different distances. Until the 17th century a reliable estimate of the true distance to the Sun and of the size of the Solar System remained out of reach, arXiv:1906.09040v1 [astro-ph.SR] 21 Jun 2019 although a good scale model could be accurately devised and actually crafted in the form of delicately adorned orreries (but not all were on-scale). Email address: [email protected] (F. Mignard) 1Published in Comptes Rendus Physique, Special issue: The new International System of Units / Le nouveau Systme international d'units https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1631070519300155 Preprint submitted to Journal of LATEX Templates June 24, 2019 Regarding the sidereal world and the immense vacuum lying beyond Saturn before reaching the first stars, some realistic ideas started emerging a good century later with the assumption that stars are Suns and share more or less the same luminosity. -
Chapter Vi Report of Divisions, Commissions, and Working
CHAPTER VI REPORT OF DIVISIONS, COMMISSIONS, AND WORKING GROUPS Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.42, on 24 Sep 2021 at 09:23:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0251107X00011937 DIVISION I FUNDAMENTAL ASTRONOMY Division I provides a focus for astronomers studying a wide range of problems related to fundamental physical phenomena such as time, the intertial reference frame, positions and proper motions of celestial objects, and precise dynamical computation of the motions of bodies in stellar or planetary systems in the Universe. PRESIDENT: P. Kenneth Seidelmann U.S. Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC 20392-5100, US Tel. + 1 202 762 1441 Fax. +1 202 762 1516 E-mail: [email protected] BOARD E.M. Standish President Commission 4 C. Froeschle President Commisison 7 H. Schwan President Commisison 8 D.D. McCarthy President Commisison 19 E. Schilbach President Commisison 24 T. Fukushima President Commisison 31 J. Kovalevsky Past President Division I PARTICIPATING COMMISSIONS: COMMISSION 4 EPHEMERIDES COMMISSION 7 CELESTIAL MECHANICS AND DYNAMICAL ASTRONOMY COMMISSION 8 POSITIONAL ASTRONOMY COMMISSION 19 ROTATION OF THE EARTH COMMISSION 24 PHOTOGRAPHIC ASTROMETRY COMMISSION 31 TIME Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.42, on 24 Sep 2021 at 09:23:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0251107X00011937 COMMISSION 4: EPHEMERIDES President: H. Kinoshita Secretary: C.Y. Hohenkerk Commission 4 held one business meeting.