DOCSLIB.ORG

COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update, June 30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update, June 30 As of June 28, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 2: Director of Administration and Management (DA&M), the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the DA&M, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilians between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memorandum on the conditions- based approach to personnel movement and travel dated March 15, 2021. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 214 of 230 Installations (93%) (Met: Step 1 & Step 2) Of the 214 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 2 reinstated travel restrictions while 1 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of June 28, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL Yes BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan Yes CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA Yes DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI Yes FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA No FORT BENNING Army USA - GA Yes FORT BLISS Army USA - TX Yes FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC Yes FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G. MEADE Army USA - MD No FORT GORDON Army USA - GA Yes FORT HAMILTON Army USA - NY Yes FORT HOOD Army USA - TX Yes FORT HUACHUCA Army USA - AZ No FORT IRWIN Army USA - CA Yes FORT JACKSON Army USA - SC Yes FORT KNOX Army USA - KY Yes FORT LEAVENWORTH Army USA - KS Yes FORT LEE Army USA - VA Yes FORT LEONARD WOOD Army USA - MO Yes FORT MCCOY Army USA - WI Yes FORT POLK Army USA - LA Yes FORT RILEY Army USA - KS Yes FORT RUCKER Army USA - AL Yes FORT SILL Army USA - OK Yes FORT STEWART Army USA - GA Yes FORT WILLIAM H. HARRISON Army USA - MT Yes GRAFENWOHR GERMANY Army Germany Yes 2 of 8 As of June 28, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted HOHENFELS GERMANY Army Germany Yes JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD Army USA - WA Yes JOINT BASE MYER HENDERSON HALL Army USA - DC Yes KAISERSLAUTERN Army Germany Yes LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA Yes LEXINGTON BLUE GRASS DEPOT Army USA - KY Yes LOS ALAMITOS AFRC Army USA - CA Yes MCALESTER ARMY AMMO PLANT Army USA - OK Yes PICATINNY ARSENAL Army USA - NJ Yes PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY Army USA - CA Yes RED RIVER DEPOT Army USA - TX Yes REDSTONE ARSENAL Army USA - AL Yes ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL Army USA - IL Yes SAN JUAN FORT BUCHANAN Army Puerto Rico Yes SCHOFIELD BARRACKS Army USA - HI Yes SIERRA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - CA Yes STUTTGART GERMANY Army Germany Yes TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA Yes US ARMY GARRISON ALASKA Army USA - AK Yes US ARMY GARRISON HAWAII Army USA - HI Yes US ARMY GARRISON MIAMI Army USA - FL Yes USA NATICK RSCH & DEV CTR Army USA - MA Yes VICENZA ITALY Army Italy Yes VILSECK Army Germany Yes WATERVLIET ARSENAL Army USA - NY Yes WEST POINT MILRES Army USA - NY Yes WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE Army USA - NM Yes WIESBADEN GERMANY Army Germany Yes YONGSAN KOREA Army South Korea Yes YUMA PROVING GROUND Army USA - AZ Yes DFAS CLEVELAND CENTER DA&M USA - OH Yes DFAS COLUMBUS CENTER DA&M USA - OH Yes DFAS HEADQUARTERS DA&M USA - IN Yes PENTAGON BUILDING SITE DA&M USA - VA Yes ANNAPOLIS NS(INCL USNA) Navy USA - MD Yes CBC GULFPORT MS Navy USA - MS Yes CHINA LAKE NAVWEAPCEN Navy USA - CA Yes COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA Navy Japan No 3 of 8 As of June 28, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted CORONADO NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - CA Yes CORPUS CHRISTI NAS Navy USA - TX Yes CRANE NAVWEAPSUPPCEN Navy USA - IN Yes FALLON NAS Navy USA - NV Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES CHINHAE KS Navy South Korea Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES SASEBO Navy Japan No INDIAN HEAD NAV ORD STA Navy USA - MD Yes JACKSONVILLE NAS Navy USA - FL Yes JBPHH PEARL HARBOR HAWAII Navy USA - HI Yes KEY WEST NAS Navy USA - FL Yes KINGS BAY NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - GA Yes LEMOORE NAS Navy USA - CA Yes LITTLE CREEK NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - VA Yes MAYPORT NAVSTA Navy USA - FL Yes MERIDIAN NAS Navy USA - MS Yes NAF ATSUGI JA Navy Japan No NAF MISAWA JA Navy Japan No NAS JRB FT WORTH TX Navy USA - TX Yes NAS KINGSVILLE TX Navy USA - TX Yes NAS SIGONELLA SICILY Navy Italy Yes NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION EVERETT Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES Navy USA - IL Yes NAVAL STATION GUAM Navy Guam No NAVAL STATION NEWPORT Navy USA - RI Yes NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN Navy Spain Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MID-SOU Navy USA - TN Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MONTEREY CA Navy USA - CA Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH Navy USA - DC Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY Navy USA - FL Yes NAVAL TRAINING CTR ORLANDO Navy USA - FL Yes NAVBASE POINT LOMA Navy USA - CA Yes NAVBASE SAN DIEGO CA Navy USA - CA Yes NAVBASE VENTURA CTY Navy USA - CA Yes NAVMAG INDIAN ISLAND Navy USA - WA Yes NAVSTA GUANTANAMO BAY Navy Cuba No NAVSUPPACT BETHESDA MD Navy USA - MD Yes NAVSUPPACT HAMPTON ROADS VA Navy USA - VA Yes 4 of 8 As of June 28, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted NAVSUPPACT MECHANICSBURG PA Navy USA - PA Yes NAVSUPPACT NAPLES IT Navy Italy Yes NAVSUPPFAC BEAUFORT SC Navy USA - SC Yes NEW LONDON NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - CT Yes NEW ORLEANS NAS JRB Navy USA - LA Yes NORFOLK NAV SHIPYD Navy USA - VA Yes NORFOLK NAVAL BASE Navy USA - VA Yes NSA ANDERSEN Navy Guam No NSA BAHRAIN Navy Bahrain No NSA SARATOGA SPRINGS NY Navy USA - NY Yes NSD YOKOSUKA JAPAN Navy Japan No NSY PORTSMOUTH Navy USA - NH Yes NWS EARLE NJ Navy USA - NJ Yes OCEANA NAS Navy USA - VA Yes PATUXENT RIVER NAS Navy USA - MD Yes PENSACOLA NAS Navy USA - FL Yes SEAL BEACH NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - CA Yes WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Navy USA - WA Yes WHITING FIELD NAS Navy USA - FL Yes YORKTOWN NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - VA Yes ALTUS AFB USAF USA - OK Yes AVIANO AB USAF Italy Yes BARKSDALE AFB USAF USA - LA Yes BEALE AFB USAF USA - CA Yes BUCKLEY AFB USAF USA - CO Yes CANNON AFB USAF USA - NM Yes COLUMBUS AFB USAF USA - MS Yes DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB USAF USA - AZ Yes DOBBINS ARB USAF USA - GA Yes DOVER AFB USAF USA - DE Yes DYESS AFB USAF USA - TX Yes EDWARDS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes EGLIN AFB USAF USA - FL Yes EIELSON AFB USAF USA - AK Yes ELLSWORTH AFB USAF USA - SD Yes F E WARREN AFB USAF USA - WY Yes FAIRCHILD AFB USAF USA - WA Yes GOODFELLOW AFB USAF USA - TX Yes 5 of 8 As of June 28, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted GRAND FORKS AFB USAF USA - ND Yes GRISSOM AFB USAF USA - IN Yes HANSCOM AFB USAF USA - MA Yes HILL AFB USAF USA - UT Yes HOLLOMAN AFB USAF USA - NM Yes HOMESTEAD AFB USAF USA - FL Yes HURLBURT FIELD USAF USA - FL Yes INCIRLIK AB SITE 1 USAF Turkey Yes JB ANACOSTIA-BOLLING USAF USA - DC Yes JB ANDREWS USAF USA - MD Yes JB CHARLESTON USAF USA - SC Yes JB ELMENDORF RICHARDSON USAF USA - AK Yes JB LANGLEY-EUSTIS USAF USA - VA Yes JB MCGUIRE DIX LAKEHURST USAF USA - NJ Yes JB SAN ANTONIO USAF USA - TX Yes KADENA AB USAF Japan No KEESLER AFB USAF USA - MS Yes KIRTLAND AFB USAF USA - NM Yes KUNSAN AB USAF South Korea Yes LAUGHLIN AFB USAF USA - TX Yes LITTLE ROCK AFB USAF USA - AR Yes LOS ANGELES AFB USAF USA - CA Yes LUKE AFB USAF USA - AZ Yes MACDILL AFB USAF USA - FL Yes MALMSTROM AFB USAF USA - MT Yes MARCH AFB USAF USA - CA Yes MAXWELL AFB (INCL. GUNTER) USAF USA - AL Yes MCCONNELL AFB USAF USA - KS Yes MINN ST PAUL ARS USAF USA - MN Yes MINOT AFB USAF USA - ND Yes MISAWA AB USAF Japan No MOODY AFB USAF USA - GA Yes MOUNTAIN HOME AFB USAF USA - ID Yes NELLIS AFB USAF USA - NV Yes NIAGARA FALLS ARS USAF USA - NY Yes OFFUTT AFB USAF USA - NE Yes OSAN AIR BASE USAF South Korea Yes PATRICK AFB USAF USA - FL Yes 6 of 8 As of June 28, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted PETERSON-SCHRIEVER GARRISON USAF USA - CO Yes PITTSBURGH ANG USAF USA - PA Yes PITTSBURGH ARS USAF USA - PA Yes RAF LAKENHEATH USAF United Kingdom Yes RAF MILDENHALL USAF United Kingdom Yes RAMSTEIN FRG USAF Germany Yes ROBINS AFB USAF USA - GA Yes SCOTT AFB USAF USA - IL Yes SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB USAF USA - NC Yes SHAW AFB USAF USA - SC Yes SHEPPARD AFB USAF USA - TX Yes SPANGDAHLEM AB USAF Germany No TINKER AFB USAF USA - OK Yes TRAVIS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes TYNDALL AFB USAF USA - FL Yes USAF ACADEMY USAF USA - CO Yes VANCE AFB USAF USA - OK Yes VANDENBERG AFB USAF USA - CA Yes WESTOVER ARB AFB USAF USA - MA Yes WHITEMAN AFB USAF USA - MO Yes WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB USAF USA - OH Yes YOKOTA AB USAF Japan No YOUNGSTOWN JOINT AIR RESERVE USAF USA - OH Yes STATION CHERRY POINT MCAS USMC USA - NC Yes MAKIMINATO OKINAWA CP BUTLER USMC Japan Yes MARINE BARRACKS WASH D.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S
    Biography Department of the Army Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S. Army Installation Management Command Joint Base Langley - Eustis, VA Ms. Tamara Payne serves as the Deputy Garrison Commander of ASA Fort Eustis, part of the Joint Base Langley- Eustis command. She is responsible for providing leadership and management of installation service delivery, performance management, business planning, and analysis on a joint base community servicing Army, Air Force and Navy servicemen and women, civilians their families and the surrounding communities. Prior to this assignment, Ms. Payne served as the IMCOM Training, Deputy Chief, Plans and Ops, Chief of Analysis and Integration and the IMCOM Central Region Installation Support lead for two of the largest installations in the Army, Fort Bliss and White Sands Missile Range, the largest Army Reserve Installation of Fort Hunter Liggett and Reserve Forces Training Area Parks. She was also dual hatted as the Chief of Plans Analysis and Integration and Transformation Office at USAG Ansbach, where she planned and led installation restructure and receipt of the Army’s first rotational aviation brigade. She has stood up and led two transformation offices, responsible for integration and planning of installation and mission initiatives in support of region-wide efforts such as the Aviation Restructure Initiative, Camp Humphreys Transformation and Yongsan Relocation Program. Throughout her civilian career she provided installation governance, transformation, strategic planning and integrated support to Soldiers, Civilians and their families at eight (8) installations across four (4) regions. She served in the United States Army as an intelligence analyst primarily focused on Persian Area studies and crypto-linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • AMC Powerpoint Presentation Template
    NEWCOMERS WELCOME DFMWR/ACS Relocation Readiness Program USAG FORT RUCKER MISSION AND VISION MISSION: To take care of Soldiers, Family Members, and Civilians and set the conditions for Mission success. 2 0 1 8 VISION: Fort Rucker is the DOD Standard for infrastructure quality; is the provider of consistent, quality services that are a force multiplier in supported organizations' mission accomplishment, and materially enhance Soldier and Family well-being and readiness. ARMY VALUES: Loyalty: Bear true faith and allegiance to the US Constitution, the Army, your unit and other Soldiers Duty: Fulfill your obligations Respect: Treat people as they should be treated Selfless Service: Put the welfare of the Nation, The Army and your subordinates before your own Honor: Live up to all the Army Values Integrity: Do what’s right, legally and morally Personal Courage: Face fear, danger, or adversity (physical or moral) POC : / 334-255-3161/ 2 of 89 MAY 2020_V1 FORT RUCKER ORGANIZATIONS Tenant Tenant Public/Private USAACE Commands Organizations Partners CR ACL CHR Mobile C USASA MEP C A Dist COE M D LAH C ATSCOM / 164th st DFA 1 AB TAOG JAG S DENTA C NEC 23rd FTS CI th 110 D AB LR C USAAR L NC OA Det 2/B/2- MIC AFC 228th Avn C WOC C Camp Shelby, MS 177th AR Bde JB Langley-Eustis Eglin AFB, FL Fort Rucker, AL` 128th Avn Bde 7th SF Group Fort Huachuca, AZ 2-13th Avn Regt POC : / 334-255-3161/ 3 of 89 MAY 2020_V1 LIVE WORK PLAY Total Acreage:62,855 (includes 1,454 leased) 5 Access Control Points 2 Visitor Control Centers Post Exchange Commissary Medical, Dental, & VA Clinics Veterinary Clinic 2 Dependent Schools 2 Dining Facilities 3 Chapels Post Theater Divot’s, The Landing Zone, Mother Rucker’s, Coffee Zones 2 Physical Fitness Centers Mini CDC Child, Youth, Teen Centers Center Library 20-Lane Bowling Center 27-Hole Golf Course 640-Acre Lake Tholocco 23 Cabins (inc Wounded Warrior Retreat) 1476 Family Housing Units (RCI) 624 Privatized Army Lodging Rooms In the Works: Edmund W.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Ch. II, App. G
    Department of Defense Ch. II, App. G U.S. Army Aviation Center, Contracting Directorate of Peninsula Contracting, Office, ATTN: ATZQ±C, Building T±00116, ATTN: ATZF±DPC, Building 2746, Har- Fort Rucker, AL 36362±5000 rison Loop, Fort Eustis, VA 23604±5293 DABT02 DABT58 2A 2P U.S. Army Chemical and Military Police Fort Monroe, ATTN: ATZG±C #62, Building Centers and Fort McClellan, ATTN: T±195, Fort Monroe, VA 23651±6000 ATZN±DOC, Building 241±C, Transpor- DABT59 tation Road, Fort McClellan, AL 36205± 2Q 5000 U.S. Army Combined Arms Support Com- DABT10 mand and Fort Lee, ATTN: ATZM±DOC, 2B Building T±7124, 19th & Quartermaster U.S. Army Infantry Center and Fort Road, Fort Lee, VA 23801±5172 Benning, ATTN: ATZB±KT, Building 6, DABT60 P.O. Box 5±5179, Fort Benning, GA 31905± 1L 5179 TRADOC Contracting Agency, ATTN: DABT11 ATCA, Building 1748, Fort Eustis, VA 2C 23604±5538 U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, DABT61 ATTN: ATZI±CT, Building 2050B, Fort BF Gordon, GA 30905±5110 The Judge Advocate General's School, DABT15 USA, University of Virginia, ATTN: F9 JAGS±SSL±B, 600 Massie Road, Char- U.S. Army Soldier Support Center and lottesville, VA 22903±1781 Fort Benjamin Harrison, ATTN: ATZI± DABT63 CT, Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN 46216± BL 5230 U.S. Army Intelligence Center, ATTN: DABT19 ATZS±DKS, P.O. Box 748, Fort Huachuca, 2D U.S. Army Combined Arms Center and AZ 85613±0748 Fort Leavenworth, ATTN: ATZL±GCC, DABT65 Pope & Thomas Avenues, Fort Leaven- B0 worth, KS 66027±5031 Mission Contracting Activity at Fort DABT23 Leavenworth, ATTN: ATOB±AL, 614 Cus- 2E ter Road, Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027± U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rucker.Armymwr.Com
    1 rucker.armymwr.com A Warm Welcome to the New Military Spouse! Congratulations on becoming a military spouse. We hope this handbook will make it easier for you to integrate into the larger Military Family. Life with the military will bring many changes and challenges, but with a smile and a positive attitude, it can be the adventure of a lifetime. This handbook covers general information concerning the military as well as information specific to your time here at Fort Rucker, the home of Army Aviation. After arrival at your first military duty location, you and your Soldier should acquaint yourselves with the area and the post/base facilities. You are also encouraged to attend a newcomers’ briefing or orientation. Each post/base has its own way of welcoming newcomers. The facilities and services that are available will vary depending on the size of the post/base. rucker.armymwr.com 2 INTRODUCTION The Fort Rucker Handbook for New Military Spouses is a reference tool for spouses new to the military. Off-post agencies are occasionally listed for information purposes to provide a full range of resources available within the Fort Rucker area. The inclusion or exclusion of any specific off-post agencies is not intended to imply an endorsement or lack of endorsement by Fort Rucker MWR, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense. NEWCOMERS’ WELCOME If you are new to Fort Rucker or you are returning after spending time away from the installation your first stop should be the Newcomers’ Welcome held every third Friday of the month starting at 8:30am at The Landing.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]
  • FORT RUCKER / WIREGRASS AREA JOINT LAND USE STUDY October 2009
    FORT RUCKER / WIREGRASS AREA JOINT LAND USE STUDY October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 6 Introduction 7 Study Background 9 Fort Rucker Background 9 Current Mission 10 JLUS Process 11 Wiregrass Region Study Area 12 Compatibility Analysis 16 Safety 17 Noise and Vibration 17 Airspace Obstructions 23 Infrastructure 27 Visibility 28 Frequency Interference 28 Intergovernmental Coordination 28 Airspace 29 Cairns Army Airfield 30 Hanchey Army Heliport 35 Knox Army Heliport 39 Lowe Army Heliport 43 Molinelli Forward Arming and 47 Refueling Point Shell Army Heliport 51 Allen Stagefield 55 Brown Stagefield 59 Ech Stagefield 63 Goldberg Stagefield 67 Hatch Stagefield 71 High Bluff Stagefield 75 Highfalls Stagefield 79 Hooper Stagefield 84 Hunt Stagefield 88 Louisville Stagefield 92 Lucas Stagefield 96 Runkle Stagefield 100 Skelly Stagefield 104 Stinson Stagefield 109 Tabernacle Stagefield 113 Tac-X Stagefield 117 Toth Stagefield 121 Recent Compatibility Efforts 125 Fort Rucker Installation Operational 125 Noise Management Plan (IONMP) Noise Complaint Management Program 125 2 Fort Rucker / Wiregrass Area JLUS Fly Neighborly Program 125 Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) 126 Property Disclosure Requirements 126 Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) 126 Compatibility Tools Recommendations 127 Conservation Tools 129 Compatible Land Use and Regulatory Tools 130 Communication and Information Dissemination Tools 133 Appendices 136 Fort Rucker Joint Land Use Study Committees 136 Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Clear Zones 137 and Accident Potential Zones Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Noise 139 Sample Memorandum of Understanding 142 Sample Area of Military Impact Real Estate Disclosure Form 144 Bibliography 145 Tables Table 1. JLUS Participating Jurisdictions 6 Table 2. Committee Meetings 12 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update
    As of December 28, 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 91 of 231 Installations (39%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 91 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 1 reinstated travel restrictions while 0 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of December 28, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State
    [Show full text]
  • Digging Deep Army Outreach Team Effort
    NEW AVIATORS TO INCUR 10-YEAR SERVICE OBLIGATION – SEE PAGE 10 SERVING THE U.S. ARMY AVIATION CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND THE FORT RUCKER COMMUNITY SINCE 1956 VOLUME 70 • NUMBER 15 • AUGUST 20, 2020 NEW LEADER USAACE welcomes incoming deputy commanding general PAGE 2 SECURITY UPGRADE Post moves to new installation access system in September PAGE 3 DIGGING DEEP USAACE honors NCO, Soldier winners of Best Warrior PAGE 4 TEAM EFFORT Food services team rises to challenge PAGE 6 PHOTO BY SGT. SARAH D. SANGSTER ARMY OUTREACH DUSTOFF pilots and flight crew train on air-to-ground patient transfers and report requirements during a multi-ship joint training mission with Tripler Army GEMS makes real-world impact Medical Center and the 8th Forward Surgical Team recently in Hawaii. The crew provided sustained medical care and transportation en route to medical facilities through each role of care, while 8th FRST provided surgical field care, and TAMC provided trauma and patient care. C Company, 3rd Battalion, 25th Aviation on youth through virtual setting Regiment is the only MEDEVAC company in the 25th Infantry Division. The company trains daily for critical missions in order to be prepared for real-world missions. PAGE 8 2 ARMY FLIER | AUGUST 20, 2020 Fort Rucker welcomes USAACE deputy commanding general By Kelly Morris family and me. But as an American, practi- USAACE Public Affairs cally every day is a great day, and having the honor to serve each day in the greatest, most The Fort Rucker community welcomed pivots from 20 years of Counterinsurgency lethal and most powerful Army in the histo- Brig.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update
    As of February 1, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 86 of 231 Installations (37%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 86 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 2 reinstated travel restrictions while 2 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Rucker Alabama
    DCN: 9960 FORT RUCKER ALABAMA Draft Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA 1 PURPOSEPURPOSE To provide The Army Basing Study (TABS) Group with an overview of Fort Rucker’s current and future mission capabilities and the impact on the operational readiness of the Department of Defense’s total force. Draft Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA 2 Draft Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA 3 BRIEFINGBRIEFING AGENDAAGENDA • FORT RUCKER TEAM • ARMY AVIATION • U.S. ARMY AVIATION CENTER • AVIATION-NESTED TENANT ACTIVITIES • OTHER TENANT ACTIVITIES • FORT RUCKER INFRASTRUCTURE • MASTER PLAN • ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE • FORCE PROTECTION/ANTITERRORISM • FORT RUCKER AND THE WIREGRASS COMMUNITIES • WORKFORCE PROFILE • ECONOMIC IMPACT • COMMUNITY RELATIONS • QUALITY OF LIFE Draft Deliberative Document – For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA 4 THETHE FORTFORT RUCKERRUCKER TEAMTEAM • U.S. ARMY GARRISON FORT RUCKER • U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS • U.S. ARMY AVIATION CENTER • SOUTH ALABAMA AREA OFFICE • AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND (AMCOM) – AVIATION • TIMBER HARVESTING OFFICE • USA TRIAL DEFENSE SERVICE FORT RUCKER CENTER LOGISTICS COMMAND FIELD OFFICE • U.S. ARMY AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES COMMAND • FORT RUCKER RESIDENT AGENCY • U.S. ARMY AVIATION TECHNICAL TEST CENTER • 3D MP GROUP (CID), USA CIDC • U.S. ARMY SCHOOL OF AVIATION MEDICINE • MULTI MEDIA BRANCH (NGB-AVN-MMB) • U.S. ARMY AEROMEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY • USAR 2D PLT, B CO, 2/228TH AVN BN TA • U.S. ARMY AEROMEDICAL CENTER • USAR 191ST MAINTENANCE COMPANY • AVIATION MEDICINE CONSULTANT TO THE ARMY • USAR 851ST QUARTERMASTER COMPANY SURGEON GENERAL • USAR ECS 143 • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update
    As of November 30, 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 110 of 231 Installations (48%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 110 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 12 reinstated travel restrictions while 0 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of November 30, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State
    [Show full text]