DOCSLIB.ORG

3 AUG 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3 AUG 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update As of August 3, 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 95 of 231 Installations (41%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 95 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 0 reinstated travel restrictions while 1 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of August 3, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD No ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL No BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany No CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan No CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA No DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI No FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA No FORT BLISS Army USA - TX No FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC No FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI No FORT DES MOINES Army USA - IA No FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD No FORT DRUM Army USA - NY No FORT GEORGE G. MEADE Army USA - MD Yes FORT GORDON Army USA - GA No FORT HAMILTON Army USA - NY Yes FORT HOOD Army USA - TX No FORT HUACHUCA Army USA - AZ No FORT IRWIN Army USA - CA No FORT JACKSON Army USA - SC No FORT KNOX Army USA - KY Yes FORT LEAVENWORTH Army USA - KS No FORT LEE Army USA - VA No FORT LEONARD WOOD Army USA - MO No FORT MCCOY Army USA - WI No FORT POLK Army USA - LA No FORT RILEY Army USA - KS Yes FORT RUCKER Army USA - AL No FORT SILL Army USA - OK Yes FORT STEWART Army USA - GA No FORT WILLIAM H. HARRISON Army USA - MT No GRAFENWOHR GERMANY Army Germany Yes 2 of 8 As of August 3, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted HOHENFELS GERMANY Army Germany Yes JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD Army USA - WA Yes JOINT BASE MYER HENDERSON HALL Army USA - DC Yes KAISERSLAUTERN Army Germany Yes LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA No LEXINGTON BLUE GRASS DEPOT Army USA - KY No LOS ALAMITOS AFRC Army USA - CA No MCALESTER ARMY AMMO PLANT Army USA - OK No PICATINNY ARSENAL Army USA - NJ No PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY Army USA - CA No RED RIVER DEPOT Army USA - TX No REDSTONE ARSENAL Army USA - AL No ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL Army USA - IL No SAN JUAN FORT BUCHANAN Army Puerto Rico No SCHOFIELD BARRACKS Army USA - HI No SIERRA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - CA No STUTTGART GERMANY Army Germany Yes TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA Yes US ARMY GARRISON ALASKA Army USA - AK Yes US ARMY GARRISON HAWAII Army USA - HI No US ARMY GARRISON MIAMI Army USA - FL No USA NATICK RSCH & DEV CTR Army USA - MA No VICENZA ITALY Army Italy Yes VILSECK Army Germany Yes WATERVLIET ARSENAL Army USA - NY No WEST POINT MILRES Army USA - NY Yes WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE Army USA - NM No WIESBADEN GERMANY Army Germany Yes YONGSAN KOREA Army South Korea Yes YUMA PROVING GROUND Army USA - AZ No DFAS CLEVELAND CENTER CMO USA - OH No DFAS COLUMBUS CENTER CMO USA - OH No DFAS HEADQUARTERS CMO USA - IN No PENTAGON BUILDING SITE CMO USA - VA Yes ANNAPOLIS NS(INCL USNA) Navy USA - MD Yes CBC GULFPORT MS Navy USA - MS No CHINA LAKE NAVWEAPCEN Navy USA - CA No COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA Navy Japan No 3 of 8 As of August 3, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted CORONADO NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - CA No CORPUS CHRISTI NAS Navy USA - TX No CRANE NAVWEAPSUPPCEN Navy USA - IN No FALLON NAS Navy USA - NV Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES CHINHAE KS Navy South Korea Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES SASEBO Navy Japan No INDIAN HEAD NAV ORD STA Navy USA - MD Yes JACKSONVILLE NAS Navy USA - FL No JBPHH PEARL HARBOR HAWAII Navy USA - HI No JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING Navy USA - DC Yes KEY WEST NAS Navy USA - FL No KINGS BAY NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - GA No LEMOORE NAS Navy USA - CA No LITTLE CREEK NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - VA No MAYPORT NAVSTA Navy USA - FL No MERIDIAN NAS Navy USA - MS No NAF ATSUGI JA Navy Japan No NAF MISAWA JA Navy Japan No NAS JRB FT WORTH TX Navy USA - TX No NAS KINGSVILLE TX Navy USA - TX No NAS SIGONELLA SICILY Navy Italy Yes NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION EVERETT Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES Navy USA - IL No NAVAL STATION GUAM Navy Guam No NAVAL STATION NEWPORT Navy USA - RI Yes NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN Navy Spain Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MID-SOU Navy USA - TN No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MONTEREY CA Navy USA - CA No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH Navy USA - DC Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY Navy USA - FL No NAVAL TRAINING CTR ORLANDO Navy USA - FL No NAVBASE POINT LOMA Navy USA - CA No NAVBASE SAN DIEGO CA Navy USA - CA No NAVBASE VENTURA CTY Navy USA - CA No NAVMAG INDIAN ISLAND Navy USA - WA Yes NAVSTA GUANTANAMO BAY Navy Cuba No NAVSUPPACT BETHESDA MD Navy USA - MD Yes 4 of 8 As of August 3, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted NAVSUPPACT HAMPTON ROADS VA Navy USA - VA No NAVSUPPACT MECHANICSBURG PA Navy USA - PA No NAVSUPPACT NAPLES IT Navy Italy Yes NAVSUPPFAC BEAUFORT SC Navy USA - SC No NEW LONDON NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - CT Yes NEW ORLEANS NAS JRB Navy USA - LA No NORFOLK NAV SHIPYD Navy USA - VA No NORFOLK NAVAL BASE Navy USA - VA No NSA ANDERSEN Navy Guam No NSA BAHRAIN Navy Bahrain No NSA SARATOGA SPRINGS NY Navy USA - NY Yes NSD YOKOSUKA JAPAN Navy Japan No NSY PORTSMOUTH Navy USA - NH Yes NWS EARLE NJ Navy USA - NJ No OCEANA NAS Navy USA - VA No PATUXENT RIVER NAS Navy USA - MD Yes PENSACOLA NAS Navy USA - FL No SEAL BEACH NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - CA No WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Navy USA - WA Yes WHITING FIELD NAS Navy USA - FL No YORKTOWN NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - VA No ALTUS AFB USAF USA - OK Yes AVIANO AB USAF Italy Yes BARKSDALE AFB USAF USA - LA Yes BEALE AFB USAF USA - CA No BUCKLEY AFB USAF USA - CO Yes CANNON AFB USAF USA - NM No COLUMBUS AFB USAF USA - MS No DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB USAF USA - AZ No DOBBINS ARB USAF USA - GA Yes DOVER AFB USAF USA - DE Yes DYESS AFB USAF USA - TX No EDWARDS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes EGLIN AFB USAF USA - FL No EIELSON AFB USAF USA - AK Yes ELLSWORTH AFB USAF USA - SD Yes F E WARREN AFB USAF USA - WY Yes FAIRCHILD AFB USAF USA - WA Yes 5 of 8 As of August 3, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted GOODFELLOW AFB USAF USA - TX Yes GRAND FORKS AFB USAF USA - ND Yes GRISSOM AFB USAF USA - IN Yes HANSCOM AFB USAF USA - MA No HILL AFB USAF USA - UT Yes HOLLOMAN AFB USAF USA - NM Yes HOMESTEAD AFB USAF USA - FL No HURLBURT FIELD USAF USA - FL No INCIRLIK AB SITE 1 USAF Turkey Yes JB ANDREWS USAF USA - MD Yes JB CHARLESTON USAF USA - SC No JB ELMENDORF RICHARDSON USAF USA - AK Yes JB LANGLEY-EUSTIS USAF USA - VA No JB MCGUIRE DIX LAKEHURST USAF USA - NJ No JB SAN ANTONIO USAF USA - TX No KADENA AB USAF Japan No KEESLER AFB USAF USA - MS No KIRTLAND AFB USAF USA - NM No KUNSAN AB USAF South Korea Yes LAUGHLIN AFB USAF USA - TX No LITTLE ROCK AFB USAF USA - AR Yes LOS ANGELES AFB USAF USA - CA No LUKE AFB USAF USA - AZ No MACDILL AFB USAF USA - FL No MALMSTROM AFB USAF USA - MT No MARCH AFB USAF USA - CA No MAXWELL AFB (INCL. GUNTER) USAF USA - AL No MCCONNELL AFB USAF USA - KS Yes MINN ST PAUL ARS USAF USA - MN No MINOT AFB USAF USA - ND Yes MISAWA AB USAF Japan No MOODY AFB USAF USA - GA No MOUNTAIN HOME AFB USAF USA - ID No NELLIS AFB USAF USA - NV No NIAGARA FALLS ARS USAF USA - NY Yes OFFUTT AFB USAF USA - NE Yes OSAN AIR BASE USAF South Korea Yes PATRICK AFB USAF USA - FL No 6 of 8 As of August 3, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted PETERSON AFB USAF USA - CO Yes PITTSBURGH ANG USAF USA - PA Yes PITTSBURGH ARS USAF USA - PA Yes RAF LAKENHEATH USAF United Kingdom Yes RAF MILDENHALL USAF United Kingdom Yes RAMSTEIN FRG USAF Germany No ROBINS AFB USAF USA - GA No SCHRIEVER AFB USAF USA - CO Yes SCOTT AFB USAF USA - IL Yes SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB USAF USA - NC No SHAW AFB USAF USA - SC No SHEPPARD AFB USAF USA - TX Yes SPANGDAHLEM AB USAF Germany Yes TINKER AFB USAF USA - OK Yes TRAVIS AFB USAF USA - CA No TYNDALL AFB USAF USA - FL No USAF ACADEMY USAF USA - CO Yes VANCE AFB USAF USA - OK Yes VANDENBERG AFB USAF USA - CA No WESTOVER ARB AFB USAF USA - MA Yes WHITEMAN AFB USAF USA - MO Yes WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB USAF USA - OH No YOKOTA AB USAF Japan No YOUNGSTOWN JOINT AIR RESERVE USA - OH USAF STATION Yes CHERRY POINT MCAS USMC USA - NC Yes MAKIMINATO OKINAWA CP BUTLER USMC Japan No MARINE BARRACKS WASH D.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Illegal Actions in the Construction of the Airfield at Fort Lee, VA-17Th
    Union Calendar No, 781 87th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - House Report No. 1858 ILLEGAL ACTIONS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE AIRFIELD AT FORT LEE, VA. SEVENTEENTH REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS JUNE 20, 1962.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 72006 WASHINGTON : 1962 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS WILLIdM L. DAWSON, Illinois, Chairman OHET HOLIFIELD, California CLARE E. HOFFMAN, Michigan JACK BROOKS, Texss R. WALTER RIEHLMAN, New York L. H. FOUNTAIN, North Carollna GEORGE MEADER, Michigan PORTER HARDY, JR., Virginia CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ohio JOHN A. BLATNIK, Minnesota FLORENCE P. DWYER, New Jersey ROBERT E. JONES, Alabamn ROBERT P. GRIFFIN, Michigan EDWARD A. QARMATZ, Maryland GEORGE M. WALLHAUSER, New Jersey JOHN E. MOSS, California ODIN LANGEN, Minnesota JOE M. KILGORE, Texas JOHN B. ANDERSON, Illinois DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania HENRY S. REUSS, Wisconsin F. BRADFORD MORSE, Massachusetts ELIZABETH PEE, West Virginia KATHRYN E. GRANAHAN, Pennsylvania JOHN S. MONAGAN, Connecticut NEAL SMITH, Iowa RICHARD E. LANKFORD, Maryland % ROSS BASS, Tennessee LUCIEN N. NEDZI, Michigan CHRISTINERAYDAVIS. Slaf Dtreelor JAMESA. LANIGAN,Ue~eral CoumeZ MILES Q. ROMNEY,Associate &nerd Counsel HELENM. BOYER,Minority Professional Raff J. P. CARLSON,Minority Coz~nseZ WILLIAM L. DAWSON, Clinois, Chairman DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ollio KATHRYN E. GRANAHAN, Pennsylvania JOHN B. ANDERSON, Illinois NEAL SMITH, Iowa CLARE E. HOFFMAN, Michigan, Ex Oficio ELMER W. HENDERSON,COlln8el ARTHURPERLMAN, I"~e~fk7of07 DANIELKAVANAUGH, In~eslioatcr VEROATCAB. JOHNSON,Clerk IRENED. MANNINO.Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HOUSEOF REPRESENTATIVES, Washington, D.C., June 20, 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 7400.8S Special Use Airspace
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ORDER JO 7400.8S Air Traffic Organization Policy February 16, 2010 SUBJ: Special Use Airspace 1. Purpose of This Order. This Order, published yearly, provides a listing of all regulatory and non-regulatory Special Use Airspace areas, as well as issued but not yet implemented amendments to those areas established by the Federal Aviation Administration. 2. Audience. Airspace and Aeronautical Operations, Air Traffic Controllers, and interested aviation parties. 3. Where Can I Find This Order. You can find this Order on the FAA employees’ Web site at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/, and the FAA Air Traffic Plans and Publications Web site at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/. 4. What This Order Cancels. JO FAA Order 7400.8R, Special Use Airspace, dated February 5, 2009 is canceled. 5. Effective Date. February 16, 2010. 6. Background. Actions establishing, amending, or revoking regulatory and non-regulatory designation of special use airspace areas, in the United States and its territories, are issued by the FAA and published throughout the year in the Federal Register or the National Flight Data Digest. These actions are generally effective on dates coinciding with the periodic issuance of the National Aeronautical Charting Office navigational charts. For ease of reference, the FAA is providing this compilation of all regulatory and non-regulatory special use airspace areas in effect and pending as of February 11, 2010. 7. Request for Information. For further information, contact the Airspace and Rules Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Campbell, Kentucky
    oop Headquarters L D a r n 12 e l d l R n e t d S ar Fort Campbell, Kentucky G t M t l ark e u et rk a G a s ar M s den A Rd Campbell Army Airfield r i d A lv B le d g 17 R a E y 26 b g r n 49 45 a i 24 Sti m Rd M llwe a alley 5 G ll e u V 9 l r ha 5 id 19 c A S t S 7 h e A S t r 18 hau Val m h ley Rd ickha 5 5 R Sabre 52 35 W 5 3 d 2 r e 37 d esse Ave 44 4 n enn 38 m d T Army 41 Stor 9 Gate 10 Desert Storm Ave ert 8 4 t ky es h tuc D 6 Ken 4 t Airfield h 2 5 Wickham m n 4 1 ha d t na 0 ick 3 h ia 1s 6 W 5 Ind t 5 0 25 A t t D ir h iv b 47 36 h isi orn 27 o 16 15 N d n e R Rd o e 1 r esse 30 Tennessee m n t 2 n 48 Ten S o a i Kentucky cky s t n tu i 31 28 l 29 Ken na d a v i u d i n 13 t I y 2 22 a S D 2 21 s 9 39 / 14 s 46 B 1 t e e h A 10 n 11 3 50 l 9 n 33 a v n Indiana S g 1 r e r d P r v c r i 32 o d A o o h o A e l M R b n k o b ia g r 7 an t o r v o i l t i sy s S n l e n a A e 34 A P B e Mississippsi Reed t L s 3 h .
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Community Action Council COL Hollie J
    UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO Welcome to the Community Action Council COL Hollie J. Martin Garrison Commander USARMY 05 November 2019 UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO The Community Action Council (CAC) HHC CASCOM HHC CASCOM SFRG Breakfast Who: Headquarters and Headquarters Company SFRG Team What: SFRG Breakfast Burrito Sale When: November 21, 2019 (0830-UTC) Where: CASCOM Building 5020 Cafe Why: Build Unit Morale and Develop Unit Esprit-de-corps DONATIONS ARE APPRECIATED J COL Hollie J. Martin/804.734.7188/[email protected] 05 November 19 UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO The Community Action Council (CAC) HHC CASCOM POW Safety Training Who: Headquarters and Headquarters Company(SFC Rolon) What: Privately On Weapon Safety Training When: November 1, 2019 (1000) Where: CASCOM Team Room 2024 Why: To educate Soldier on the importance of POW handing IAW Fort Lee Regulation 190-2 COL Hollie J. Martin/804.734.7188/[email protected] 05 November 19 UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO The Community Action Council (CAC) HHC CASCOM CASCOM CG Golf Scramble Who: Headquarters and Headquarters Company What: CASCOM CG Golf Scramble When: November 1, 2019 Where: Cardinal Golf Club Why: Build Unit Morale and Develop Unit Esprit-de-corps Cardinal Golf Club 11810 A Avenue Fort Lee 23801 Join us for an afternoon on the beautiful Cardinal Golf Course for the upcoming CG Scramble. Entry Fee is $35 for Members, $45 for non members. Fee includes greens fees, golf cart, driving range, lunch, and prizes (Mulligans will be available for sale). POC: SGM James Yuras PH: 804-765-1700 Email: [email protected] COL Hollie J.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S15029
    November 18, 2003 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S15029 (5) NOTICE REQUIREMENT.—The amounts may Mr. KENNEDY. I think there is a commander of the Fifth Army. I first be obligated or expended only if the Mayor noti- consent that has been agreed to where- met General Clark over 5 years ago fies the Committees on Appropriations of the by there are 2 hours equally divided, when he was commander of the 101st House of Representatives and the Senate in with 40 minutes for myself and 15 min- Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, writing 30 days in advance of any obligation or expenditure. utes for Senator DAYTON. KY. Since that time, I have known (6) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds made Mr. WARNER. The Senator is correct General Clark to be an honest man and available pursuant to this section shall remain on that. an excellent soldier. The military com- available until expended. Mr. KENNEDY. I will not necessarily munities in Kentucky and Tennessee This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Co- take all of that time. surrounding Fort Campbell admire lumbia Appropriations Act, 2004’’. Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I thank General Clark very much. He is well re- The Presiding Officer appointed Mr. my colleague. spected throughout the Army, and we DEWINE, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. Major General Clark is a highly should be grateful that we have sol- BROWNBACK, Mr. STEVENS, Ms. qualified officer for promotion to the diers like General Clark serving and LANDRIEU, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. INOUYE rank of lieutenant general. I have met protecting our Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • RPUID) Numbers
    ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN No. 2013-24 Issuing Office: CECW-CE Issued: 20 Aug 2013 Expires: 20 Aug 2015 Subject: Identification of Real Property Unique Identification (RPUID) Numbers Applicability: Directive 1. References. a. DoD Instruction 4170.11 Installation Energy Management, 11 DEC 09. b. Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, 27 Jan 07. c. Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, 5 Oct 09. d. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-02, High Performance Sustainable Building Requirements, 1 MAR 13. e. High Performance Sustainable Building Guiding Principles, 1 DEC 08. 2. Executive Order 13423 requires that all new construction and major renovation comply with the High Performance Sustainable Building Guiding Principles (GP). The Department of Defense requires through DoD Instruction 4171.11 that the services (Army, Navy and Air Force) report their buildings complying with the GP through the Annual Energy Management Report. This information is then provided to the Department of Energy to show compliance with Executive Order 13423. 3. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification can indicate compliance with many of the GPs. Therefore, it is important to identify when buildings have achieved LEED certification to assist the services in complying with GP requirements and EO 13423. The tracking of GP compliance is accomplished through real property inventory and data ECB No. 2013-24 Subject: Engineering and Construction Bulletin (ECB) Management and Format Requirements base with each building is identified by a RPUID. Therefore it is also important to link the RPIUD to LEED certified buildings. 4. Attached is a list of LEED certified buildings where USACE served as the design/construction agent sorted by USACE district.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S
    Biography Department of the Army Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S. Army Installation Management Command Joint Base Langley - Eustis, VA Ms. Tamara Payne serves as the Deputy Garrison Commander of ASA Fort Eustis, part of the Joint Base Langley- Eustis command. She is responsible for providing leadership and management of installation service delivery, performance management, business planning, and analysis on a joint base community servicing Army, Air Force and Navy servicemen and women, civilians their families and the surrounding communities. Prior to this assignment, Ms. Payne served as the IMCOM Training, Deputy Chief, Plans and Ops, Chief of Analysis and Integration and the IMCOM Central Region Installation Support lead for two of the largest installations in the Army, Fort Bliss and White Sands Missile Range, the largest Army Reserve Installation of Fort Hunter Liggett and Reserve Forces Training Area Parks. She was also dual hatted as the Chief of Plans Analysis and Integration and Transformation Office at USAG Ansbach, where she planned and led installation restructure and receipt of the Army’s first rotational aviation brigade. She has stood up and led two transformation offices, responsible for integration and planning of installation and mission initiatives in support of region-wide efforts such as the Aviation Restructure Initiative, Camp Humphreys Transformation and Yongsan Relocation Program. Throughout her civilian career she provided installation governance, transformation, strategic planning and integrated support to Soldiers, Civilians and their families at eight (8) installations across four (4) regions. She served in the United States Army as an intelligence analyst primarily focused on Persian Area studies and crypto-linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court Middle District of Tennessee Nashville Division
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION FAYE RENNELL HOBSON ) ) v. ) NO. 3:17-1485 ) PATRICK M. SHANAHAN ) Acting Secretary, Department of Defense1 ) TO: Honorable William L. Campbell, Jr., District Judge R E P O R T A N D R E C O M M E N D A T I O N By Order entered December 18, 2017 (Docket Entry No. 8), this pro se action was referred to the Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(a)( and (B), Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Court. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 46), to which Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition. See Docket Entry Nos. 48-50, 52, and 54. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned respectfully recommends that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Faye Rennell Hobson (“Plaintiff”) is a resident of Clarksville, Tennessee and a former employee of the United States Department of Defense Education Activity (“DoDEA”), an agency within the Department of Defense (“DoD”). Plaintiff began working as a teacher with the DoDEA in 2002, and held several different teaching jobs within the DoDEA over the course of the next decade and a half. Some of the jobs were within the United States at the Fort Campbell Military Installation (“Fort Campbell”) and some were overseas in Germany and Guam, and, most recently, 1 Upon the resignation of James Mattis as the Secretary of Defense, Patrick M.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94Th Congress an Act Uct
    89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94th Congress An Act Uct. /, 1975^ rpQ authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other purposes. [S. 1247] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assenibled^ construction and guard and reserve TITLE I—ARMY forces facilities authorization acts, 1976. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mili­ Military tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, Construction rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, Authorization including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Act, 1976. and equipment for the following acquisition and construction: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Defense Support Activity (Fargo Building), Boston, Massachu­ setts, $8,000,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina. $13,214,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $13,680,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $10,732,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $46,281,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $870,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $31,861,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, $2,892,000. Fort Ord, California, $32,209,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $54,361,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $1,685,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $14,879,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia, $39,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Benning, Georgia, $44,212,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia, $633,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $6,945,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $14,546,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $42,898,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $719,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $41,090,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Site-Specific Environmental Radiation Monitoring Plan, Fort
    FINAL SITE-SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING PLAN FORT CAMPBELL, KENTUCKY ANNEX 4 FOR MATERIALS LICENSE SUC-1593, DOCKET NO. 040-09083 September 2016 Submitted By: U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND ATTN: IMSO, Building 2261 2405 Gun Shed Road, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-1223 Submitted To: U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards 11545 Rockville Pike, Two White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 INSTALLATION BACKGROUND ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 HISTORICAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.5 EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL SOURCE-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS ..................... 1-6 2.0 ERMP SAMPLE DESIGN ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT
    [Show full text]