DOCSLIB.ORG

Bp1 / Llv Impacts + Beyond

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bp1 / Llv Impacts + Beyond BP1 / LLV IMPACTS + BEYOND Games Monitor [ Briefing paper on London 2012 Olympic Games ] Games Monitor, December 2015 (fifth edition) – replacing previous background papers and extensively revised Other papers in the series: BP 2 / Finance, profit + infrastructure BP 3 / Apparatus (state + media) http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/contact_media_centre Games Monitor was founded in 2005 to raise awareness on issues around the London 2012 development process. We can be contacted at [email protected]. Questions on the background papers specifically should be addressed to Carolyn Smith [email protected]. CONTENTS 1. Loss of habitat and Common Land 7 1.1 Wildlife casualties and habitat destruction 7 1.2 Loss of Common Land, historic landscape and open space 8 Lammas Lands Exchange land (Hackney Marshes) Greenwich Park Wanstead Flats Leyton Marsh Drapers Field 2. Clearance of settlements, firms and local sport 13 2.1 Population displacements 13 Homelessness Gypsies and Travellers Clays Lane estate Students living on the Park Village estate Carpenters Estate, Stratford Manor Garden allotments River Lea bargees 2.2 International context of residential displacement 19 Erasure of Roma settlements, Athens 2004 Forced removal, Beijing 2008 Gentrification and resistance, Vancouver 2010 Clashes and inadequate infrastructure, Sochi 2014 Repression in the favelas, Rio 2016 2.3 Local economy: displacement of small businesses 23 2.4 Sporting losses and targets 25 Grassroots sport Cycling Football (soccer) Swimming Cuts to sports finance Sports participation 3. Contamination fears and impact of construction 27 3.1 Radioactive contamination and hazardous waste 27 3.2 Air pollution associated with construction 28 3.3 Impacts of construction on local residents 29 3.4 Sewage contamination 29 4. Policy evaluation 30 4.1 London 2012: the ‘greenest Olympic Games’? 30 Carbon neutrality Sustainability criteria (Stratford precinct) Wind turbines Air pollution associated with Olympic construction London’s air quality Locally sourced and seasonal food Bibliography 33 Dedicated to the memory of Katy Andrews 1958–2015 The wind searched in the forest grass and found a word, / it sounded like unsayable life / but it was a name the biggest stone gave / to the smallest twilight butterfly. / Too hard to remember says the wave. / Too fine to be said flickers the wind. (From Chickweed Wintergreen by Harry Martinson [Tarset: Bloodaxe Books, 2010]) ACRONYMS Common to all background papers. ABAC Association of British Athletics Clubs ACPO Association of Chief Police Officers AI Amnesty International AOTU Art on the Underground ASA Amateur Swimming Association ASBO Anti-social Behaviour Order ATCSA Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 BCCLA British Columbia Civil Liberties Association BOA British Olympic Association BOCOG Beijing Organising Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games BTCV British Trust for Conservation Volunteers C6/C7 Sixth century/seventh century etc CABE Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment CARP Carpenters Against Regeneration Plans CBC Canadian Broadcasting Corporation CCHP Combined cooling heat and power CCTV Closed-circuit television CLM Consortium managing London 2012 construction: CH2M Hill (environmental evaluation), Laing O’Rourke (construction), Mace (project management) CLO Community legal observer COHRE Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions CPET UK Central Point of Expertise on Timber CPO Compulsory Purchase Order CSIS Canadian Security Intelligence Service CSJ Centre for Social Justice CTRL Channel Tunnel Rail Link DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government DCMS Department for Culture, Media and Sport DDOS Distributed denial of service DLR Docklands Light Railway DPU Development Planning Unit (UCL) ECJ European Court of Justice EDAW Consultancy, now part of AECOM, responsible for Olympic masterplanning EIC Environment Industries Commission ELL East London Line EU European Union FA Football Association FIFA Fédération Internationale de Football Association FOI Freedom of information GMB General Municipal Boilermakers and Allied Trade Union GLA Greater London Authority JPAT Joint Planning Authorities Team HCA Homes and Communities Agency HLF Heritage Lottery Fund HMUG Hackney Marsh User Group IOC International Olympic Committee ILO International Labour Organisation IT Information technology IWW International Workers of the World LBH London Borough of Hackney LBN London Borough of Newham LBTH London Borough of Tower Hamlets LBWF London Borough of Waltham Forest LCR London and Continental Railways LDA London Development Agency (1999–2012) LGTU London Gypsy and Traveller Unit LED Light-emitting diode LLDC London Legacy Development Corporation (2012–) LLV Lower Lea Valley LLW London ‘living wage’ LOAR London Olympic Association Right, dates from London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006 LOCOG London Organising Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games (2005–2014) LRO Legislative Reform Order LRRA Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act LTGDC London Thames Gateway Development Corporation LVRPA Lee Valley Regional Park Authority MDC Mayoral development corporation MGS Manor Gardening Society MLBG Marshgate Lane Business Group NAPO Formerly the National Association of Probation Officers NEF New Economics Foundation NLL North London Line NLLDC New Lammas Lands Defence Committee NMP Newham Monitoring Project NOGOE No to Greenwich Olympic Equestrian Events NRF Neighbourhood Renewal Fund NRMM Non-road mobile machinery NSNO No Second Night Out (homelessness initiative) ODA Olympic Delivery Authority (2006–2014) ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister OLD Olympic Legacy Directorate, part of the LDA OPLC Olympic Park Legacy Company (2009–2012) ORN Olympic Route Network PwC PricewaterhouseCoopers RSL Registered social landlord SMEs Small and medium-sized enterprises SOCOG Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games TFL Transport for London TMA Team Member Agreement TMO Tenant management organisation TUC Trades Union Council UAV Unmanned aerial vehicles UCATT Union of Construction Allied Trades and Technicians UCL University College London UEL University of East London UPPs Pacifying police units (Brazil) US United States VANOC Vancouver Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games WFSGI World Federation of the Sporting Goods Industry 1. LOSS OF HABITAT AND COMMON LAND 1.1 Wildlife casualties and habitat destruction Much of the information in this section is sourced from statements by ecology consultant Annie Chipchase, a specialist on the Lower Lea Valley, and Anne Woollett, chair of Hackney Marsh User Group (HMUG). Other sources are stated in the text. Olympic proposals will destroy all the existing habitat, and thus the associated wildlife. Proposals to provide mitigation in terms of translocating species, and providing alternative habitat, are unlikely to be successful. Only legally protected species will be the focus of such work. The waterways of the Lower Lea provide a unique place for wildlife and people in a dense urban area. Destruction of these habitats for an elite sporting event should not be contemplated. Annie Chipchase (2005). Statement for the No London 2012 press conference, February 14 Location of the Olympic precinct could not be worse in terms of environment in the Lower Lea Valley (LLV). The river Lea system is designated a Site of Metropolitan Importance1 for nature conservation, and is an important passage and migration route for birds. The area also contains statutory Sites of Borough Importance: the former Eastway cycle circuit and Bully Point nature reserve, plus the Greenway and Old Ford Nature Reserve. These, with the Carpenters Road Nature Area, Arena Field and White Hart Field are Common Land and supposedly protected by legislation. London Development Agency (LDA), London 2012 and the Mayor of London’s office, backed up by a chorus of press commentary, portrayed the environment of the Lower Lea and Bow Back rivers as largely contaminated and polluted. ‘Remediation will be a massive challenge. There are considerable amounts of contamination,’ said Gareth Blacker, then LDA director of Olympic development (Romanowicz 2006). The environmental statement produced by masterplanners EDAW as part of the 2004 planning application described the waterways as ‘corridors of dereliction’. However, local residents have long enjoyed flora and fauna among its reedbed, scrub and grassland habitats, and birdlife nesting in the very many mature trees. Annie Chipchase described London 2012 proposals as a ‘kick in the teeth for the thousands of volunteers’, who, for more than 25 years, had contributed much time and labour to improving habitat. Species protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), threatened by Olympic developments, included bats, common lizard, kingfisher and nationally scarce black redstart, which frequented the brownfield areas around Marshgate Lane. More common bird species frequently sighted in and around the Hackney Marshes – coot, moorhen, mallard, mute swan, green woodpecker, grey wagtail, great-crested and little grebes, dunnock, tits, sand martins and kestrel – had protection only in the nesting season. Disuse and neglect of the brownfield areas had considerable benefit for wildlife. Waterways and associated wetlands, former industrial sites and left-over parcels of land are important habitats. Extensive areas of sparsely vegetated or open ground are especially valuable for rare and uncommon invertebrates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mark Wallinger Study for Self Reflection
    Press Release Mark Wallinger Study for Self Reflection Hauser & Wirth New York, 22nd Street 13 September – 27 October 2018 Opening reception: Thursday 13 September, 6 – 8 pm New York… Hauser & Wirth is pleased to present ‘Study for Self Reflection,’ Turner prize-winning artist Mark Wallinger’s first solo exhibition with the gallery in the United States. One of Britain’s foremost contemporary artists, Wallinger is recognized for his rich and complex body of work, spanning painting, sculpture, installation, printmaking, video, performance, and photography. This exhibition features new paintings and two large-scale sculptures presented for the first time to an American audience. The works on view extend Wallinger’s career-long engagement with ideas of power, authority, artifice, and illusion. The theme of reflection is central to Wallinger’s oeuvre; the artist deploys it to probe questions about the psyche and the self, and to challenge our attachment to our identities and the socio-cultural mechanisms that inform them. Entering the gallery, visitors are confronted with ‘Superego’ (2016), a sculpture composed of a mirrored triangular prism rotating atop a post. Inspired by the revolving New Scotland Yard sign, which marks the entrance of London’s police headquarters, ‘Superego’ directly references this symbol of authority; Wallinger interprets the sign’s constant motion as the unremitting and omniscient eye of law enforcement. In distilling this totem, Wallinger produces an enigmatic symbol of intimidation and dominance. While the sculpture’s seductive surface appeals to our own desire for self-reflection and recognition, its position above viewers’ heads denies direct access to our mirrored image.
    [Show full text]
  • Series 1 (001-131)
    Nigel's Webspace - English Football Cards 1965/66 to 1979/80 Team checklist I have the complete set 1973/74 A&BC chewing gum (English) Footballer, Blue backs, Series 1 (001-131) 015 Kevin Hector 003 Rodney Marsh 039 Roy McFarland 075 Mike Summerbee 036 Checklist 087 John McGovern Manchester United Arsenal 111 David Nish 054 Martin Buchan 073 Alan Ball 063 Colin Todd 127 George Graham 001 Ray Kennedy Everton 078 Brian Kidd 097 Bob McNab 053 John Connolly 102 David Sadler 025 John Radford 077 Joe Harper 006 Alex Stepney 120 Pat Rice 128 Colin Harvey 030 Ian Storey-Moore 049 Bob Wilson 029 Howard Kendall Newcastle United Birmingham City 101 Roger Kenyon 028 Stewart Barrowclough 089 Trevor Francis 005 David Lawson 004 Frank Clark 065 Bob Hatton Ipswich Town 076 David Craig 113 Roger Hynd 042 Kevin Beattie 052 Terry Hibbitt 041 John Roberts 114 Bryan Hamilton 100 Malcolm MacDonald 017 Tony Want 018 Allan Hunter 129 John Tudor Burnley 066 Mick Mills Norwich City 123 Frank Casper 090 Trevor Whymark 083 Terry Anderson 122 Martin Dobson Leeds United 107 Geoff Butler 106 Mike Docherty 103 Billy Bremner 059 Duncan Forbes 084 Leighton James 007 Trevor Cherry 035 Graham Paddon 094 Colin Waldron 031 Allan Clarke 012 Clive Payne Chelsea 055 David Harvey Queens Park Rangers 098 Peter Bonetti 058 Mick Jones 034 Dave Clement 002 Chris Garland 079 Peter Lorimer 010 Anthony (Tony) Hazell 131 Ron Harris 126 Paul Madeley 082 Dave Thomas 074 John Hollins Leicester City 121 Terry Venables 050 Alan Hudson 024 Alan Birchenall 023 Peter Osgood Sheffield United
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections Why Vote? English
    Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH United Kingdom Results of the 23 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political parties compared with affiliation votes votes seats 2014 Brexit Party EFDD 30.74% 29 ↑ Liberal Democrat Party Renew Europe 19.75% 16 ↑ Labour Party S&D 13.72% 10 ↓ Green Party Greens/EFA 11.76% 7 ↑ Conservative Party ECR 8.84% 4 ↓ Scottish National Party Greens/EFA 3.50% 3 ↑ Plaid Cymru, Party of Greens/EFA 0.97% 1 ↑ Wales Sinn Fein GUE/NGL 0.62% 1 = Democratic Unionist 0.59% 1 = Party Alliance Party 0.5% 1 ↑ Showing 1 to 10 of 10 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Rory Palmer Labour Party S&D Claude Ajit Moraes Labour Party S&D Sebastian Thomas Dance Labour Party S&D Jude Kirton-Darling Labour Party S&D Theresa Mary Griffin Labour Party S&D Julie Carolyn Ward Labour Party S&D John Howarth Labour Party S&D Jacqueline Margarete Jones Labour Party S&D Neena Gill Labour Party S&D Richard Graham Corbett Labour Party S&D Barbara Ann Gibson Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Lucy Kathleen Nethsingha Liberal Democrats Renew Europe William Francis Newton Dunn Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Irina Von Wiese Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Dinesh Dhamija Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Luisa Manon Porritt Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Chris Davies Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Jane Elisabeth Brophy Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Sheila Ewan Ritchie Liberal Democrats Renew Europe Catherine Zena Bearder Liberal Democrats
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits of the Forest
    FRUITS OF THE FOREST The desirabilities, possibilities and practicalities of a Waltham Forest Local Food Scheme Report by Ru Litherland for OrganicLea Community Growers, March 2003 OrganicLea acknowledge the support of Groundwork Trust in the preparation of this report Summary of Report This report aims to explore the desirabilities, possibilities and practicalities of a Waltham Forest Local Food Scheme. In doing so, it will first make the case for local food schemes, in general and for the London Borough of Waltham Forest in particular. The benefits – social, environmental, health, economic and cultural - will be briefly noted, as will the extent to which greater awareness of these benefits has led to increasing interest in healthy, sustainable and local food nationwide. The report will then focus on the main areas of existing local food production in Waltham Forest, efforts to promote local food, plus existing and potential demand from local people. The question of how a local food scheme would operate is then addressed. Various models of distribution, and of organisational structure, are considered in the light of specific local circumstances, and some recommendations made The issue of organic certification is raised, and an alternative local certification symbol counterposed. Legal ramifications of a local food scheme are given due consideration. In concluding, some suggestions are made for those wishing to further pursue the project of a Waltham Forest Local Food Scheme. 1. Introduction: Local Food Schemes and their Benefits To begin with, it is necessary to hone the definition of “local food economy”, “local food schemes” and other references to “local food” to be encountered below.
    [Show full text]
  • Tate Report 08-09
    Tate Report 08–09 Report Tate Tate Report 08–09 It is the Itexceptional is the exceptional generosity generosity and and If you wouldIf you like would to find like toout find more out about more about PublishedPublished 2009 by 2009 by vision ofvision individuals, of individuals, corporations, corporations, how youhow can youbecome can becomeinvolved involved and help and help order of orderthe Tate of the Trustees Tate Trustees by Tate by Tate numerousnumerous private foundationsprivate foundations support supportTate, please Tate, contact please contactus at: us at: Publishing,Publishing, a division a divisionof Tate Enterprisesof Tate Enterprises and public-sectorand public-sector bodies that bodies has that has Ltd, Millbank,Ltd, Millbank, London LondonSW1P 4RG SW1P 4RG helped Tatehelped to becomeTate to becomewhat it iswhat it is DevelopmentDevelopment Office Office www.tate.org.uk/publishingwww.tate.org.uk/publishing today andtoday enabled and enabled us to: us to: Tate Tate MillbankMillbank © Tate 2009© Tate 2009 Offer innovative,Offer innovative, landmark landmark exhibitions exhibitions London LondonSW1P 4RG SW1P 4RG ISBN 978ISBN 1 85437 978 1916 85437 0 916 0 and Collectionand Collection displays displays Tel 020 7887Tel 020 4900 7887 4900 A catalogue record for this book is Fax 020 Fax7887 020 8738 7887 8738 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. DevelopDevelop imaginative imaginative education education and and available from the British Library. interpretationinterpretation programmes programmes AmericanAmerican Patrons Patronsof Tate of Tate Every effortEvery has effort been has made been to made locate to the locate the 520 West520 27 West Street 27 Unit Street 404 Unit 404 copyrightcopyright owners ownersof images of includedimages included in in StrengthenStrengthen and extend and theextend range the of range our of our New York,New NY York, 10001 NY 10001 this reportthis and report to meet and totheir meet requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIEFING PAPER a Boost for British Businesses: Policies for a New Government
    the entreprenurs network | tenentrepreneurs.org June 2017 BrIeFING pAPER A Boost For BrItIsh BusInesses: polIcIes For A new government Britain’s exit from the European Union will understandably be the focus of the new Government – after all, the deal that’s struck will be critical for Britain’s businesses. But to capitalise on new trade opportunities, and gear our economy to support future generations without further increasing the public sector deficit, we must have an immediate plan to boost British businesses. In partnership with A Boost F or BrItIsh BusInesses: polIcIes F or A new government 1 A culture of entrepreneurship needs hard policies behind it. If we can deliver growth for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) – who “these proposals are make up 99 per cent of private sector businesses, employ 15m people across all about supporting the UK and have a collective turnover in the region of £1.8tn – we can safeguard the future success of our economy. business owners who want to grow their We have spoken to entrepreneurs in our network of over 10,000 businesses.” entrepreneurs, as well as experts in other organisations who work directly with many thousand more business owners to come up with some immediate wins for the next Government. These proposals are all about supporting business owners who want to grow their businesses. We must take down the barriers and free up entrepreneurs to fulfil their ambitions by making the UK the best place to start and grow a business. AwArEnEss of BUsinEss sUpport Over the past decade, successive Governments have done a great deal to bolster the UK’s start-up environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lea Valley Walk
    THE LEA VALLEY WALK LEAGRAVE TO THE HEART OF LONDON by Leigh Hatts JUNIPER HOUSE, MURLEY MOSS, OXENHOLME ROAD, KENDAL, CUMBRIA LA9 7RL www.cicerone.co.uk 774 Lea Valley text 2020 3rd Ed Rpt.indd 3 28/09/2020 14:52 © Leigh Hatts 2015 Third edition 2015 ISBN 978 1 85284 774 6 Reprinted 2020 (with updates) Second edition 2007 First edition 2001 Printed in Singapore by KHL using responsibly sourced paper. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey® with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Licence number PU100012932. Updates to this Guide While every effort is made by our authors to ensure the accuracy of guidebooks as they go to print, changes can occur during the lifetime of an edition. Any updates that we know of for this guide will be on the Cicerone website (www.cicerone.co.uk/774/updates), so please check before planning your trip. We also advise that you check information about such things as transport, accommodation and shops locally. Even rights of way can be altered over time. We are always grateful for information about any discrepancies between a guidebook and the facts on the ground, sent by email to [email protected] or by post to Cicerone, Juniper House, Murley Moss, Oxenholme Road, Kendal, LA9 7RL. Register your book: To sign up to receive free updates, special offers and GPX files where available, register your book at www.cicerone.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Isla Hoffmann-Heap Report Habitats Regulations Assessment for The
    Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan London Borough of Bromley Project Number: 60474250 November 14 2016 Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Isla Hoffmann-Heap Dr James Riley Max Wade Consultant Ecologist Associate Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 15/11/16 Draft JR James Riley Associate Prepared for: London Borough of Bromley AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan Prepared for: London Borough of Bromley Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann-Heap Consultant Ecologist T: 01256 310 486 M: 07920 789 719 E: [email protected] AECOM Limited Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2016 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: London Borough of Bromley AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sscott Megacities S Paulo Rio Edv2
    Megacities: A Study of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro Grade Level: 9-12 Subject: Geography, World History Key Words: megacities, urban design Time Frame: 1-2 days Designed by: Sharlyn Scott School District: Desert Vista High School Summary: Using São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro as case studies to research and compare/contrast, students will gain a greater understanding of basic urban geography and the history and geography of Brazil. Background Information: Megacities are urban conglomerations with populations exceeding 10 million; sources vary on exactly how many global cities (and their urban sprawl) can be categorized as such. According to the United Nations, there were an estimated 37 cities with more than 10 million people in 2015, compared to just 14 in 1995, and they estimate there will be 41 (maybe as many as 43) megacities by 2030. Two of the three megacities in Latin America are in Brazil: São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. For more information about megacities, São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro, see: • Blakemore (2016) “Five Things to Know About Megacities” (Smithsonian): https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/five-things-to-know-about- megacities-180958937/ • Catalytic Communities “Favela Facts”: http://catcomm.org/favela-facts/ • "São Paulo: South America’s Megacity”: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=sNEeY_gXFBc Student Objectives Students will be able to • Consider the needs of human populations within a city (their own as an introduction) and what challenges/successes city planners and leaders, as well as the population of that city, experience. • Research characteristics of the physical geography and human geography of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro in order to create together a clearer picture and understanding of these two megacities in Brazil, and the successes/challenges both have experienced.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Area Appraisal October 2020
    London Borough of Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal October 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Author(s): Maria Medlycott, Teresa O’Connor, Katie Lee-Smith Derivation: Origination Date: 15/10/2020 Reviser(s): Tim Murphy Date of last revision: 23/11/2020 Date Printed: 23/11/2020 Version: 2 Status: Final 2 Contents 1 Acknowledgments and Copyright ................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 3 Explanation of Archaeological Priority Areas .................................................................. 8 4 Archaeological Priority Area Tiers ................................................................................ 10 5 History of Waltham Forest Borough ............................................................................. 13 6 Archaeological Priority Areas in Waltham Forest.......................................................... 31 6.1 Tier 1 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.2 Tier 2 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.3 Tier 3 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 32 6.4 Waltham Forest APA 1.1. Queen Elizabeth Hunting Lodge GV II* .................... 37 6.5 Waltham Forest APA 1.2: Water House ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions for London and the South East 4194
    Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Applications and Decisions Publication Number: 4194 Publication Date: 04/02/2021 Objection Deadline Date: 25/02/2021 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (London and the South East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 04/02/2021 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] PLEASE NOTE THE PUBLIC COUNTER IS CLOSED AND TELEPHONE CALLS WILL NO LONGER BE TAKEN AT HILLCREST HOUSE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE The Office of the Traffic Commissioner is currently running an adapted service as all staff are currently working from home in line with Government guidance on Coronavirus (COVID-19). Most correspondence from the Office of the Traffic Commissioner will now be sent to you by email. There will be a reduction and possible delays on correspondence sent by post. The best way to reach us at the moment is digitally. Please upload documents through your VOL user account or email us. There may be delays if you send correspondence to us by post. At the moment we cannot be reached by phone. If you wish to make an objection to an application it is recommended you send the details to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Set Checklist I Have the Complete Set 1972/73 Arbeshi Reproductions George Keeling Caricatures
    Nigel's Webspace - English Football Cards 1965/66 to 1979/80 Set checklist I have the complete set 1972/73 Arbeshi Reproductions George Keeling caricatures Peter Allen Orient Brian Hall Liverpool Terry Anderson Norwich City Paul Harris Orient Robert Arber Orient Ron Harris Chelsea George Armstrong Arsenal David Harvey Leeds United Alan Ball Arsenal Steve Heighway Liverpool Gordon Banks - All Stars Stoke City Ricky Heppolette Orient Geoff Barnett Arsenal Phil Hoadley Orient Phil Beal Tottenham Hotspur Pat Holland West Ham United Colin Bell - All Stars Manchester City John Hollins Chelsea Peter Bennett Orient Peter Houseman Chelsea Clyde Best West Ham United Alan Hudson Chelsea George Best - All Stars Manchester United Emlyn Hughes - All Stars Liverpool Jeff Blockley - All Stars Arsenal Emlyn Hughes Liverpool Billy Bonds West Ham United Norman Hunter Leeds United Jim Bone Norwich City Pat Jennings Tottenham Hotspur Peter Bonetti Chelsea Mick Jones Leeds United Ian Bowyer Orient Kevin Keegan Liverpool Billy Bremner Leeds United Kevin Keegan - All Stars Liverpool Max Briggs Norwich City Kevin Keelan Norwich City Terry Brisley Orient Howard Kendall - All Stars Everton Trevor Brooking West Ham United Ray Kennedy Arsenal Geoff Butler Norwich City Joe Kinnear Tottenham Hotspur Ian Callaghan Liverpool Cyril Knowles Tottenham Hotspur Clive Charles West Ham United Frank Lampard West Ham United Jack Charlton Leeds United Chris Lawler Liverpool Martin Chivers Tottenham Hotspur Alec Lindsay Liverpool Allan Clarke Leeds United Doug Livermore Norwich
    [Show full text]