DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Damage from Offshore Dredging: Recommendations for Pre-Operational Surveys and Mitigation During Dredging to Avoid Adverse Impacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Damage from Offshore Dredging: Recommendations for Pre-Operational Surveys and Mitigation During Dredging to Avoid Adverse Impacts OCS STUDY MMS 2004-005 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DAMAGE FROM OFFSHORE DREDGING: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRE-OPERATIONAL SURVEYS AND MITIGATION DURING DREDGING TO AVOID ADVERSE IMPACTS PREPARED FOR: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE Under Contract Number No. 01-02-CT-85139 February 2004 OCS Report MMS 2004-005 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DAMAGE FROM OFFSHORE DREDGING: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRE-OPERATIONAL SURVEYS AND MITIGATION DURING DREDGING TO AVOID ADVERSE IMPACTS Prepared for: Leasing Division, Sand and Gravel Unit Minerals Management Service U.S. Department of Interior Herndon, Virginia Prepared by: Research Planning, Inc. Columbia, South Carolina Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. Washington, North Carolina W.F. Baird & Associates Ltd. Madison, Wisconsin February 2004 DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Cover Art: Painting by Fitz Hugh Lane (M-19323). Published in Johnson, P. F., 1983. Steam and the Sea. Peabody Museum of Salem, Salem, Massachusetts, p.63. i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS OF STUDY......................................................................................................2 2.1 Worldwide Review of Current Dredging Practices .................................................2 2.2 Archaeological Review Methods ............................................................................3 3.0 THE NATURE OF SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES.......................................4 3.1 Inundated Prehistoric Sites.......................................................................................4 3.1.1 OCS Habitation Hypothesis and Lower Sea-level Stands ...........................4 3.1.2 Submerged Cultural Resource Baseline Studies..........................................5 3.1.3 Testing and Refining the OCS Baseline Models for Prehistoric Sites.........7 3.1.4 Dredging and Initial Evidence of Inundated Prehistoric Habitation ............8 3.1.5 Recent Evidence of Inundated Prehistoric Habitation in the OCS ..............9 3.1.6 Paleo-landforms with High Probability of Prehistoric Sites in the OCS ...10 3.1.7 Potential for Preservation of the Prehistoric Archaeological Record ........11 3.1.8 Technologies for the Search for Inundated Prehistoric Sites .....................11 3.2 Shipwreck Remains...............................................................................................12 3.2.1 Shipwreck Baseline Studies.......................................................................14 3.2.2 Vessel Types Potentially Present in OCS Borrow Areas...........................14 3.2.3 Classification of Shipwreck Remains ........................................................16 3.2.3.1 High Integrity Shipwrecks.............................................................16 3.2.3.2 Moderate Integrity Shipwrecks......................................................17 3.2.3.3 Low Integrity Shipwrecks..............................................................17 3.2.4 Remote Sensing in the Search for Historic Shipwreck Sites .....................17 4.0 STATE-OF-THE-ART REMOTE SENSING AND DATA ANALYTICAL TOOLS FOR SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ...................................18 4.1 Recent Technological Advances in Magnetometers..............................................18 4.2 Recent Technological Advances in Acoustic Instruments ....................................19 4.3 Global Positioning Systems ..................................................................................22 4.4 Advanced Survey and Dredging Software and GIS Applications .........................23 5.0 DREDGING IMPACTS ON SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES .....................24 5.1 Direct Impacts of Dredging ...................................................................................24 6.0 DREDGING INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS ..............................................................31 6.1 Current Dredging Practices: Equipment ................................................................31 6.2 Current Dredging Practices: Location of the Dredge Position...............................31 6.3 Current Dredging Practices: Buffer Zones ............................................................32 7.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS ................................33 ii 7.1 Current MMS Requirements for Gulf of Mexico Archaeological Resource Surveys..........................................................................33 7.2 Assessment of Current MMS Standards for Archaeological Resource Surveys ...35 7.2.1 Archaeological Resource Survey Navigation ............................................35 7.2.2 Survey Patterns: Impacts on Range and Resolution of Acoustic Imaging ......................................................................................................36 7.2.3 Survey Patterns: Impacts on Range and Resolution in Magnetic Imaging ......................................................................................39 7.3 Agency and Institution Survey Line Spacing Requirements .................................43 8.0 BUFFER ZONES...............................................................................................................44 8.1 Buffer Zone Criteria...............................................................................................44 8.2 Buffer Zone Design Considerations.......................................................................46 8.3 Proposed Formula for Establishing Buffer Zones..................................................47 8.4 Preventing Formation of Pedestals ........................................................................50 8.5 Buffer Zone Monitoring.........................................................................................51 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO AVOID ADVERSE IMPACTS TO ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES DURING DREDGING ...........................................52 9.1 Geographic Information System-Based Management ...........................................52 9.2 Refining, Refocusing, and Testing Baseline Studies .............................................52 9.3 Remote Sensing Equipment and Survey Methods for Location and Identification ..........................................................................................................54 9.3.1 Digital Data Display, Recording, and Storage ...........................................54 9.3.2 Digital Magnetometer Systems..................................................................54 9.3.3 Digital Sonar Systems................................................................................55 9.3.4 High Resolution Chirp Subbottom Profilers..............................................55 9.3.5 High Resolution Multibeam Echo Sounders..............................................55 9.3.6 Differential Global Positioning..................................................................56 9.3.7 Submerged Cultural Resource Survey Line Spacing and Anomaly Definition...................................................................................56 9.4 Buffer Zones ..........................................................................................................56 9.5 Dredging Operations..............................................................................................57 9.6 Monitoring Dredging Activity ...............................................................................59 9.7 Archaeological Resource Report Requirements ....................................................61 10.0 CITED REFERENCES......................................................................................................62 APPENDIX A: Letter and Questionaire Sent to Dredging Contractors APPENDIX B: Archaeological Questionnaire APPENDIX C: Assessment of the Risk of Sedimentation Over an Archaeological Site due to Dredging APPENDIX D: Table of Questionare Responses from Dredging Contractors iii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. Sea-level curve showing the rapid rise in sea level at the end of the Late Wisconsinian glaciation, starting about 10,000 years ago .......................................5 FIGURE 2. Map of the Holly Beach “fluvial system” at a 300 m spacing between tracklines for the geotechnical investigation and the higher density mapping (50 m) of the fluvial channels for cultural resources ...................................................................13 FIGURE 3. High-resolution Klein 500 kHz side scan sonar image of the Civil War blockade runners Georgiana and Mary Bowers sunk off Charleston, South Carolina .........20 FIGURE 4. Mosaic of dredging scars compiled from high-resolution 600 kHz sonar images ...................................................................................................................21 FIGURE 5. Reson Sea Bat 8125 image of a World War II LCT sunk off Omaha Beach, Normandy during the D-Day Landing ...................................................................22 FIGURE 6. Plan of the surviving remains of the mid-fifteenth century shipwreck discovered during dredging of the Ria de Averio, Portugal...................................27 FIGURE 7. Plan of the surviving remains of the steamship Mary sunk adjacent to the Aransas Pass,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China's Merchant Marine
    “China’s Merchant Marine” A paper for the China as “Maritime Power” Conference July 28-29, 2015 CNA Conference Facility Arlington, Virginia by Dennis J. Blasko1 Introductory Note: The Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook defines “merchant marine” as “all ships engaged in the carriage of goods; or all commercial vessels (as opposed to all nonmilitary ships), which excludes tugs, fishing vessels, offshore oil rigs, etc.”2 At the end of 2014, the world’s merchant ship fleet consisted of over 89,000 ships.3 According to the BBC: Under international law, every merchant ship must be registered with a country, known as its flag state. That country has jurisdiction over the vessel and is responsible for inspecting that it is safe to sail and to check on the crew’s working conditions. Open registries, sometimes referred to pejoratively as flags of convenience, have been contentious from the start.4 1 Dennis J. Blasko, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army (Retired), a Senior Research Fellow with CNA’s China Studies division, is a former U.S. army attaché to Beijing and Hong Kong and author of The Chinese Army Today (Routledge, 2006).The author wishes to express his sincere thanks and appreciation to Rear Admiral Michael McDevitt, U.S. Navy (Ret), for his guidance and patience in the preparation and presentation of this paper. 2 Central Intelligence Agency, “Country Comparison: Merchant Marine,” The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2108.html. According to the Factbook, “DWT or dead weight tonnage is the total weight of cargo, plus bunkers, stores, etc., that a ship can carry when immersed to the appropriate load line.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Issues in International Martime Transport
    Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development __________________________________________________________________________________________ Or. Eng. DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF TRANSPORT REGULATORY ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL MARTIME TRANSPORT Contact: Mr. Wolfgang Hübner, Head of the Division of Transport, DSTI, Tel: (33 1) 45 24 91 32 ; Fax: (33 1) 45 24 93 86 ; Internet: [email protected] Or. Eng. Or. Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d’origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format 1 Summary This report focuses on regulations governing international liner and bulk shipping. Both modes are closely linked to international trade, deriving from it their growth. Also, as a service industry to trade international shipping, which is by far the main mode of international transport of goods, has facilitated international trade and has contributed to its expansion. Total seaborne trade volume was estimated by UNCTAD to have reached 5330 million metric tons in 2000. The report discusses the web of regulatory measures that surround these two segments of the shipping industry, and which have a considerable impact on its performance. As well as reviewing administrative regulations to judge whether they meet their intended objectives efficiently and effectively, the report examines all those aspects of economic regulations that restrict entry, exit, pricing and normal commercial practices, including different forms of business organisation. However, those regulatory elements that cover competition policy as applied to liner shipping will be dealt with in a separate study to be undertaken by the OECD Secretariat Many measures that apply to maritime transport services are not part of a regulatory framework but constitute commercial practices of market operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Maneuvers for Service Under MSC Charter New AMO Jobs with AMSEA on Second BBC Cargo Ship
    Volume 42, Number 5 May 2012 BBC Seattle re-flagged Swift maneuvers for service under MSC charter New AMO jobs with AMSEA on second BBC cargo ship The U.S.-flagged high-speed vessel (HSV 2) Swift and the French warship Adroit recently performed steaming exercises together. The Swift is operated for the U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command by Sealift Inc. and is manned in all licensed positions by American Maritime Officers. AMO aboard Q-max LNG carrier Aamira American Maritime Officers mem- bers working aboard the LNG car- Photo: Captain Bud Conroy rier Aamira in April, here during a transit of the Suez Canal headed The U.S. flag was raised aboard the for Milford Haven, Wales, included newly renamed multipurpose cargo Third Assistant Engineer Matthew ship BBC Seattle on April 28. The ship’s Arnold and First Assistant re-flag team consisted of First Assistant Engineer Tom McCarthy. AMO offi- Engineer Kevin Hogle, Port Engineer cers sail in senior and junior posi- Matt Burnett, Chief Engineer Matt tions aboard LNG carriers in the Campbell, and Chief Mate Peter Kirk. Nakilat fleet operated for Qatargas The BBC Seattle will be fully crewed in by Shell Ship Management early May and will enter service under Limited. The Aamira, among the charter to the U.S. Navy’s Military world’s largest and most advanced Sealift Command later in the month. Q-max LNG carriers — with a General Dynamics American Overseas capacity of 266,000 cubic meters, Marine is providing crew management was delivered to Nakilat and services for the BBC Seattle and BBC Qatargas in May of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confederate Blockade Runner Denbigh MEMBERSHIP J
    The INA Quarterly , ,, , ,; J , ,,, , , ............, ,<" , .:; , , ,, , , ," , , ,, A, Volume 26 No. 2 Summer 1999 3 The Confederate Blockade Runner Denbigh MEMBERSHIP J. Brzrf~lArtlcrld 111, Andy Hall, Tom Oertling, and Institute of Nautical Archaeology Christine A. Powell P.O. Drawer HG College Station, TX 77841-5137 13 St. Michael and the Port Royal Weights C. Wayne Smith Learn firsthand of the latest discov- eries in nautical archaeology. Mem- 16 In the Field be rs receive the INA Quarterly and other benefits (see INA Quarterly =.I, 27. 18 Review: The Alnbamn and the Kearsarge: Researcher (students only) .....$5 The Sailor's Cinil War Seafarer. ................. $40-99 by William Marvel Surveyor .............. $10&249 Mark A. Feulner Diver ................... $250449 Restorer ................ $50&999 Curator ...........$1,000-$2,499 19 In Memoriam: Excavator ........... $2,500-4,949 Charles Olin Mc Whirter Archaeologist: ......$5,00&9,999 Navigator .......... $10,000-24,999 Anchor ..........$25,000 and over Checks in U.S.currency should be made On the cover: A paintlng shows the Confederate blockade runner payable to INA. Thr portionof any dr~ Dcnbigh, which sank in Galvestan Bay six weeks after Robert E. nation in excess of $lC.00 is a tax-de- Lee's Army of Northern Virginia surrendered in 1865. Courtesy ductible, char-tabl contribution. Charles Peery. 0August 1999 by the Institute of Nautical Archamlogy. All rights resenred. INA welcomes requests !o reprint LNA Quarterly articles and iliustrations. hrb:des for publication should be submitted in hard copy and on a 3.25 diskette (Macintosh, m,ur Windows format acceptable) ~l~ngwith .dl artwork. Please address all requests and submissions to the Ed~tor,INA Quarterly, P.0.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office
    U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations ICEBREAKERS AND THE U.S. COAST GUARD by Donald L. Canney Among the many missions of the U.S. Coast Guard, icebreaking is generally viewed as a rather narrow specialty, associated most often in the public mind with expeditions into the vast Polar unknowns. However, a study into the service's history of ice operations reveals a broad spectrum of tasks - ranging from the support of pure science to the eminently practical job of life saving on frozen waters. Furthermore, the nature of each of these functions is such that none can be considered "optional": all are vital - whether it be in the arena of national defense, maritime safety, international trade, or the global economy. The origin of icebreaking in the United States came in the 1830s, with the advent of steam propulsion. It was found that side-wheel steamers with reinforced bows were an excellent means of dealing with harbor ice, a problem common to East Coast ports as far south as the Chesapeake Bay. These seasonal tasks were common, but were strictly local efforts with no need to involve the Coast Guard (then called the Revenue Marine or Revenue Cutter Service). The service's first serious encounter with operations in ice came after the purchase of Alaska in 1867. The Revenue Cutter Lincoln became the first of many cutters to operate in Alaskan waters. Though the vessel was a conventional wooden steamer, she made three cruises in Alaskan waters before 1870. Since that time the Bering Sea patrol and other official - and unofficial - tasks made the Revenue Service a significant part of the development of that territory and state.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwrecks on the Upper Wicomico River, Salisbury Maryland Shipwrecks
    The Search for the Lion of Baltimore: An American Privateer from the War of 1812 By David Shaw his is the story of the search for an American T privateer sunk by the British in the Chesapeake Bay in 1814. The time was the War of 1812. United States naval ships were blockaded in port by the British. Most of the naval battles of the war were fought on inland lakes such as Lake George and Lake Champlain in New York State. In large part because of the blockade, the new United States government looked to private enterprise to help out – private enterprise in the form of privateering. Privateers were nautical mercenaries, non-military, ship-borne raiders sanctioned to attack enemy vessels, whether naval or merchant, in the name of the Federal government. Privateering was, of course, not unique to An American schooner escaping from H.M.S. Pylades America or to the War of 1812. As early as the 13th during the War of 1812. From a watercolorin the century, ship commanders were issued formal Macpherson Collection. authorization from their governments, known as Letters of Marque and Reprisal, which allowed and in some destroyed 15 Royal Navy ships and no commercial cases encouraged them to prey on enemy ships. vessels. During the same period, American privateers Privateers were an effective way for a government to seized three naval vessels and an estimated 2,500 British mobilize a naval force without expending much money. merchant vessels. The success of the privateers forced Or, as in the case of the United States in the War of the British to convoy merchant ships, which further 1812, these nautical irregulars supported a navy that was engaged Royal Navy vessels already busy blockading blockaded and ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Structural Casualties of the Ro-Ro Vessel Using Straight and Oblique Collision Incidents on the Car Deck
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Comparing Structural Casualties of the Ro-Ro Vessel Using Straight and Oblique Collision Incidents on the Car Deck Aditya Rio Prabowo 1,* , Dong Myung Bae 2 and Jung Min Sohn 2,* 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia 2 Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Systems Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.R.P.); [email protected] (J.M.S.) Received: 24 April 2019; Accepted: 6 June 2019; Published: 11 June 2019 Abstract: Roll on-roll off (Ro-Ro) ship is the preferable vessel for public transportation and also as a medium to distribute several commodities. Its operations are a straightforward process but traffic management is quite delicate, especially for cross-route. Moreover, maritime incidents sometimes occur, causing significant casualties and in the case of the Ro-Ro, collision with other ship is a possible threat with the ability to trigger immense damages. This research, therefore, was conducted to assess the structural casualties of a Ro-Ro vessel under collision. This was modelled with respect to a ship involved in a certain incident in Indonesia in the latest decade, and the designed collision problems were calculated using the finite element approach. The collision angle was selected as the main input parameter with the straight collision of angle 90◦ and oblique collision with different angles applied to the scenario. The results found the collision energy due to structural destruction to have distinct pattern and peak value under oblique cases with lower values observed for straight collision for all scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Concepts of Maritime Transport and Its Present Status in Latin America and the Caribbean
    or. iH"&b BASIC CONCEPTS OF MARITIME TRANSPORT AND ITS PRESENT STATUS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN . ' ftp • ' . J§ WAC 'At 'li ''UWD te. , • • ^ > o UNITED NATIONS 1 fc r> » t 4 CR 15 n I" ti i CUADERNOS DE LA CEP AL BASIC CONCEPTS OF MARITIME TRANSPORT AND ITS PRESENT STATUS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN UNITED NATIONS Santiago, Chile, 1987 LC/G.1426 September 1987 This study was prepared by Mr Tnmas Sepûlveda Whittle. Consultant to ECLAC's Transport and Communications Division. The opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily coincide with those of the United Nations. Translated in Canada for official use by the Multilingual Translation Directorate, Trans- lation Bureau, Ottawa, from the Spanish original Los conceptos básicos del transporte marítimo y la situación de la actividad en América Latina. The English text was subse- quently revised and has been extensively updated to reflect the most recent statistics available. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS Sales No. E.86.II.G.11 ISSN 0252-2195 ISBN 92-1-121137-9 * « CONTENTS Page Summary 7 1. The importance of transport 10 2. The predominance of maritime transport 13 3. Factors affecting the shipping business 14 4. Ships 17 5. Cargo 24 6. Ports 26 7. Composition of the shipping industry 29 8. Shipping conferences 37 9. The Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences 40 10. The Consultation System 46 * 11. Conference freight rates 49 12. Transport conditions 54 13. Marine insurance 56 V 14.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Liberty'cargo Ship
    ‘LIBERTY’ CARGO SHIP FEATURE ARTICLE written by James Davies for KEY INFORMATION Country of Origin: United States of America Manufacturers: Alabama Dry Dock Co, Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyards Inc, California Shipbuilding Corp, Delta Shipbuilding Co, J A Jones Construction Co (Brunswick), J A Jones Construction Co (Panama City), Kaiser Co, Marinship Corp, New England Shipbuilding Corp, North Carolina Shipbuilding Co, Oregon Shipbuilding Corp, Permanente Metals Co, St Johns River Shipbuilding Co, Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp, Todd Houston Shipbuilding Corp, Walsh-Kaiser Co. Major Variants: General cargo, tanker, collier, (modifications also boxed aircraft transport, tank transport, hospital ship, troopship). Role: Cargo transport, troop transport, hospital ship, repair ship. Operated by: United States of America, Great Britain, (small quantity also Norway, Belgium, Soviet Union, France, Greece, Netherlands and other nations). First Laid Down: 30th April 1941 Last Completed: 30th October 1945 Units: 2,711 ships laid down, 2,710 entered service. Released by WW2Ships.com USA OTHER SHIPS www.WW2Ships.com FEATURE ARTICLE 'Liberty' Cargo Ship © James Davies Contents CONTENTS ‘Liberty’ Cargo Ship ...............................................................................................................1 Key Information .......................................................................................................................1 Contents.....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Towline V. 63 16 Layout 1
    Good Work on the Water Moran at 150: a Reflection he year 2010 marks Moran’s tressed by the company’s driving work ethic and 150th anniversary in busi- its knack for recognizing and seizing opportunity. ness, and the company’s long In the early days, the towing business was immi- and storied history has been grants’ work. They came in waves, looking for quite a voyage. Moran’s ves- meaningful, rewarding employment — rugged, sels have churned steadfastly pioneering spirits who could be fiercely ambitious. onward from era to era, man- In early-20th-century New York Harbor, the pre- aging to prosper through the dominant method of securing towing work was to company’s formative years in race out ahead of the competition and meet an Tthe 1800s, two World Wars, the Great Depression, incoming ship as it entered a channel, whereupon the boom and bust years of the late 20th century, you would nail the contract. There were around 50 and into the globally connected 21st century. tugboat companies flourishing in the Harbor. What accounts for such staying power? Fewer than ten remain today. The answer could doubtless fill a doorstop of a In essence, Moran’s good fortune continued book, brimming with pictures ranging from the unabated as the company grew along with the historic to the nostalgic. But the short answer is, American economy, in an industry so necessary Moran’s evolution as a company is an epic story of for prosperity that it defied obsolescence. It was fortunate timing compounded by hard work and not all happenstance, of course; long before entrepreneurial vision.
    [Show full text]
  • N.S. Savannah History – World's First Nuclear Merchant Ship
    N.S. Savannah History – World’s First Nuclear Merchant Ship CONSTRUCTION OF THE N.S. SAVANNAH (NSS) BEGAN WITH A CEREMONY ON MARITIME DAY IN 1958. MAMIE EISENHOWER CHRISTENED THE SHIP IN 1959 AND BY EARLY 1962 THE SHIP WAS AT SEA. THE SHIP’S MAIDEN VOYAGE TO SAVANNAH, GEORGIA TOOK PLACE IN AUGUST 1962. The NSS entered service as an experimental ship and MARAD placed the NSS into a reserve fleet in Virginia, spent three years sailing to ports in the U.S. and overseas while carrying out an allowed period of storage before carrying passengers, cargo and goodwill. Thousands of decommissioning the nuclear power plant. After another people visited the ship in each port, bringing the vision of round of shipyard maintenance, MARAD moved the NSS Atoms for Peace to the world. When the experiment was to Baltimore in 2008. It is here that MARAD will safely finished, the NSS operated as a cargo ship for another conduct the decommissioning process and determine five years. By 1970, the NSS achieved its objectives and Savannah’s future. the project ended. Savannah sailed 454,675 miles on 163 pounds of uranium; if it had been oil-fired, Savannah would have burned nearly 29 million gallons of fuel. Like all commercial nuclear power plants, the NSS is licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). After the ship’s fuel was removed in 1971, the reactor was made inoperable and the NRC converted MARAD’s license to only allow possession of the reactor. The license was modified to allow the NSS to operate as a museum in South Carolina from 1982 to 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberto Frigerio Ph.D. Thesis
    IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, Lucca Lucca, Italy The Underwater Cultural Heritage: a Comparative Analysis of International Perspectives, Laws and Methods of Management PhD Program in MDCH XXV Cycle By Alberto Frigerio 2013 The dissertation of Alberto Frigerio is approved. Programme Coordinator: Maria Luisa Catoni, IMT Lucca Supervisor: Lorenzo Casini, La Sapienza, Roma Tutor: Lorenzo Casini, La Sapienza, Roma The dissertation of Alberto Frigerio has been reviewed by: [Name, Surname, Affiliation] [Name, Surname, Affiliation] IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, Lucca 2013 Dedicated to my family: You’re the best crew a captain could wish for! Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES p. X ACKNOWLEDGMENTS p. XII VITA AND PUBLICATIONS p. XIII ABSTRACT p. XIV INTRODUCTION p. 1 CHAPTER 1: THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT p. 16 1. The difficulties to elaborate a shared definition of underwater cultural heritage p. 16 2. The identification and assessment of the values associated with the underwater cultural heritage: a complex challenge, but of great importance p. 23 3. Managing the risk: the principal threats affecting the underwater cultural heritage p. 30 4. The interplaying interests related to the management of the underwater cultural heritage p. 36 4.1 Evaluating the compatibility of the interests at stake: trade-off or constructive interaction? p. 43 4.2 Planning the underwater cultural heritage management: a hierarchical pyramid of interests with a bottom up impact p. 51 5. Stakeholders identification and analysis: the problem to fulfill different expectations p. 54 6. A comprehensive theoretical model aimed to guide decision makers in the management of the underwater cultural heritage p.
    [Show full text]