DOCSLIB.ORG

Examining a Misapplication of Nearest Shrucnken Centroid Classification Ot Investigate Book of Mormon Authorship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examining a Misapplication of Nearest Shrucnken Centroid Classification Ot Investigate Book of Mormon Authorship Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 23 Number 1 Article 8 2011 Examining a Misapplication of Nearest Shrucnken Centroid Classification ot Investigate Book of Mormon Authorship Paul J. Fields G. Bruce Schaalje Matthew Roper Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Fields, Paul J.; Schaalje, G. Bruce; and Roper, Matthew (2011) "Examining a Misapplication of Nearest Shrucnken Centroid Classification ot Investigate Book of Mormon Authorship," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 23 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol23/iss1/8 This Response to Criticisms is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Examining a Misapplication of Nearest Shrunken Centroid Classification to Investigate Book of Mormon Authorship Author(s) Paul J. Fields, G. Bruce Schaalje, and Matthew Roper Reference Mormon Studies Review 23/1 (2011): 87–111. ISSN 2156-8022 (print), 2156-8030 (online) Abstract Review of “Reassessing Authorship of the Book of Mormon Using Delta and Nearest Shrunken Centroid Classification” (2008), by Matthew L. Jockers, Daniela M. Witten, and Craig S. Criddle. Examining a Misapplication of Nearest Shrunken Centroid Classification to Investigate Book of Mormon Authorship Review of Matthew L. Jockers, Daniela M. Witten, and Craig S. Criddle. “Reassessing authorship of the Book of Mormon using delta and nearest shrunken centroid classification.”Literary and Linguistic Computing 23/4 (2008): 465–91. Paul J. FieldS, G. BruCe SChaalJe, and Matthew roPer Editor’s note: The above-referenced essay by Jockers, D. P. Hurlbut, a disgruntled former member of Witten, and Criddle (hereafter Criddle and associates) the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was answered by G. Bruce Schaalje, Paul J. Fields, and sworn enemy to Joseph Smith, Howe argued Matthew Roper, and Gregory L. Snow in a technical that the Book of Mormon was based on an unpub- paper entitled “Extended nearest shrunken centroid lished fictional tale by an unsuccessful amateur classification: A new method for open-set authorship novelist, Solomon Spalding. Spalding lived in attribution of texts of varying sizes,” Literary and Conneaut, Ohio, between 1809 and 1812. Howe Linguistic Computing 26/1 (2011): 71–88. We have claimed that Sidney Rigdon somehow acquired invited Fields, Schaalje, and Roper to provide both a Spalding’s unpublished manuscript and added popularization of this important essay and a brief his- religious material, thereby concocting the Book 1 tory of efforts to use what is called stylometry to iden- of Mormon. tify the authors of disputed texts. In addition, because The 1884 recovery of an original Spalding man- Professor Criddle has been involved in efforts to resus- uscript bearing little resemblance to the Book of Mormon led most critics to abandon the Spalding- citate the Spalding-Rigdon theory of Book of Mormon Rigdon conspiracy theory.2 This manuscript is authorship, Roper and Fields were also invited to com- ment on that rather moribund explanation in a sepa- 1. E. D. Howe, Mormonism Unvailed . (Painesville, OH, 1834). For an rate essay that immediately follows this one. overview of the Spalding theory, see Matthew Roper, “The Mythical ‘Manuscript Found,’” FARMS Review 17/2 (2005): 7–140; and Roper, n 1834 the first anti-Mormon book was pub- “Myth, Memory, and ‘Manuscript Found,’” FARMS Review 21/2 (2009): 179–223. lished in Ohio by E. D. Howe. Relying on I 2. Most Latter-day Saint and non–Latter-day Saint students of the testimony claimed to have been gathered by issue have concluded that even if “Manuscript Story” was not the Mormon Studies Review 23.1 | 87 88 | Fields, Schaalje, and Roper—Misapplication of Nearest Shrunken Centroid Classification known today variously as “Manuscript Story” or Spalding or Sidney Rigdon: “The NSC results the “Oberlin manuscript.” Today, among those are consistent with the Spalding-Rigdon theory who reject Joseph Smith’s explanation of the of authorship,” and “our findings are consistent Book of Mormon, a majority see Joseph Smith with historical scholarship indicating a central alone as responsible for the text and believe role for Rigdon in securing and modifying a now- that the Spalding theory sheds no light on Book missing Spalding manuscript” (p. 482). Although of Mormon origins. A minority of these critics they claim to have discovered evidence for continue to argue that the Book of Mormon was smaller contributions from Parley P. Pratt and based on a hypothesized second or third, now-lost Oliver Cowdery, the authors “find strong support Spalding manuscript, though even the existence of for the Spalding-Rigdon theory of authorship. In such a manuscript has never been proved.3 all the data, we find Rigdon as a unifying force. A recent article by three Stanford research- His signal dominates the book, and where other candidates are more probable, Rigdon is hiding in ers—Matthew Jockers, Daniela Witten, and Craig the shadows” (p. 483). Criddle—is the latest in a series of stylometric We here examine the stylometric analysis pre- investigations of Book of Mormon authorship.4 sented by Criddle and associates. We first review The Criddle and associates study applies a sta- past attempts—stylometric and otherwise—to tistical methodology developed for genomics analyze Joseph’s writing style. We review the research,5 known as Nearest Shrunken Centroid strengths and weaknesses of those attempts and (NSC) classification, to the question of Book of assess past authors’ success in meeting objec- Mormon authorship. In contrast to previous tions to their findings. We then address the valid- wordprint studies, Criddle’s team concluded ity of Criddle and associates’ methodology, its that the majority of the chapters in the Book utility in dealing with questions of authorship of Mormon were written by either Solomon in general, and its application to authorship of only version of Spalding’s tale, the story would not have differed the Book of Mormon in particular. Lastly, we substantially in content and style from the Oberlin document. Roper present the findings of our study extending the argues that “Manuscript Story” can be seen as fictional apologetic for the theory that the Indians were the lost ten tribes. See Roper, NSC methodology, which shows the naïveté and “Myth, Memory, and ‘Manuscript Found,’” 193–200. invalidity of Criddle and associates’ efforts to add 3. Roper argues that elements in the 1833 testimony collected by a mathematical patina to an untenable historical Hurlbut and later testimony from other Conneaut associates of Spalding, which some Spalding theorists take as evidence for hypothesis that has been long abandoned by vir- additional manuscript sources for the Book of Mormon, are more tually all serious scholars, whether believers or plausibly accounted for as describing elements of the Oberlin story. skeptics. See Roper, “Myth, Memory, and ‘Manuscript Found,’” 179–223. Roper and Fields examine the misuse of historical evidence by Criddle and associates in the essay that immediately follows this one. Prelude to Stylometry: Joseph Smith’s 4. Matthew L. Jockers, Daniela M. Witten, and Craig S. Criddle, Writing Style “Reassessing authorship of the Book of Mormon using delta and nearest shrunken centroid classification,” Literary and Linguistic Computing In 1976 Elinore Partridge performed a study of 23/4 (2008): 465–91. the characteristics of Joseph Smith’s writing style. 5. Genomics is a branch of molecular biology concerned with researching the structure, function, evolution, and mapping She also studied the writings of several of his closest of the entire DNA sequences of organisms. associates—Sidney Rigdon, Frederick G. Williams, Mormon Studies Review 23.1 | 89 Parley P. Pratt, Oliver Cowdery, and Willard ther punctuation nor capitalization as sen- Richards. Partridge detected a characteristic tone tence markers. When his writing has been in the Prophet’s writings. edited, or when someone else wrote words In contrast to the dark visions of Calvin- which he dictated, the result is an unusu- ism and the dry, rational theology of Uni- ally large number of sentences beginning tarianism, Joseph Smith’s pronouncements with for, and, or but (almost three out of emphasize the wonder of existence and the five sentences). On the other hand, Sid- love of humanity. Likewise, in contrast to ney Rigdon seldom used these conjunc- the threats of wrath, judgment, and dam- tions, and almost never used them at the nation, which one can find in the state- beginning of sentences; on the average, ments of some of the early church leaders, only about one in twenty sentences begins there is an undercurrent of understanding with and, for, but. Rigdon’s sentences fre- and compassion in those of Joseph Smith. quently begin with participial or prepo- Moments of discouragement and anger do sitional phrases; for example, ‘Having occur; however, even at times when he shown . .’ ‘From the foregoing we learn laments the state of mankind, he tempers . .’ which is a structure Joseph Smith sel- the observations with trust in God, love for his family, and hope for the future. The dom used. Sidney Rigdon regularly used love of others, the pleasure in variety, and phrases such as ‘in order that,’ ‘so that,’ or the joy in living which is apparent in the ‘the fact that,’ to introduce and link ideas. language of Joseph Smith give us some real Joseph Smith almost invariably uses ‘that’ sense, I believe, of what he must have been or ‘this’ instead. Joseph Smith’s images and like as a leader and a friend.6 examples are concrete, specific, and well- Partridge also found significant “markers” of detailed, while Sidney Rigdon’s tend to be 8 Joseph Smith’s style that distinguish his writing abstract and generalized.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Hyde's "Mormonism, Its Leaders" Part 4
    John Hyde's "Mormonism, Its Leaders" part 4 http://thedigitalvoice.com/enigma/hyd1857d.htm#pg237a MORMON STUDIES PRESENTS: John Hyde's Mormonism, Its Leaders... (NYC, W. P. Fetridge, 1857) (part 4 of 4) Chapters: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 go to: Title | Introductory | Contents (with links to all chapters) | Appendix return to page 236 [ 237 ] CHAPTER X. 1 of 93 2/26/09 4:21 PM John Hyde's "Mormonism, Its Leaders" part 4 http://thedigitalvoice.com/enigma/hyd1857d.htm#pg237a THE EXTERNAL EVIDENCES OF THE BOOK OF MORMON. Mormon style of proof -- Attacks on the Bible examined -- Laws of evidence -- Contradictions between statements -- Urim and Thummim -- Affidavits as to Smith's statements -- Contradiction of probabilities -- Weight of book -- Smith's previous character -- Affidavit of eleven citizens -- Of fifty-one -- Of different individuals -- Smith's witnesses -- Contradictions -- O. Cowdery -- Harris -- Whitmer -- Of the eight witnesses -- Analysis of testimony -- False grounds of the Mormons -- Examination of prophetic evidence -- Summary. A FEW of the many evidences of imposture, contained in the Book of Mormon, have been examined in the last chapter, and the result of which, must be the conclusion that the book does not commend itself, either to the judgment or the heart. The Mormons have two ways of defending their book. One is by a constant retreat to its external evidence, and the other by an acrimonious assault on the Bible. It is not that the nature of the book shall prove the authenticity of its pretensions; but that the pretensions of the book shall prove its authenticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Solomon Spalding
    MormonLeaks.com –Episode 2 –Has “Old Come to Pass”come to life again? Episode 2 Has “Old Come to Pass” come to life again? ! Slide 1 MormonLeaks.com 1 MormonLeaks.com –Episode 2 –Has “Old Come to Pass”come to life again? Alternative accounts! Has “Old Come to Pass” come to life again?! The Gold Bible He called himsef “A Company Dangerous Man”! revelation! “Necessity is the mother of invention”! Advent of The Last Smith and Rigdon Dispensation! Institutional Response Slide 2 MormonLeaks.com 2 MormonLeaks.com –Episode 2 –Has “Old Come to Pass”come to life again? So far, we have two Vermont likely candidate authors, both in Lake Ontario upstate New York. NEW YORK Cowdery Smith Lake Erie Named as candidate authors in November, 1830 PENNSYLVANIA OHIO Slide 3 Expected interactions based on geography: (1) Rigdon, Spalding, Pratt and (2) Cowdery and Smith. Authorship allegations: 1. Joseph Smith –– Joseph Smith, Jr. was published as the "author" of the 1830 Book of Mormon. 2. Joseph Smith, Jr. and Oliver Cowdery The Cleveland Herald (Nov. 25, 1830) stated: “Mr. Cowdry and Mr. Smith the reputed author, have taken the old Bible to keep up a train of circumstances, and by altering names and language have produced the string of Jargon called the "Book of Mormon"... http://www.sidneyrigdon.com/dbroadhu/OH/miscohio.htm#112530 .Painesville Telegraph Nov. 16, 1830: “About two weeks since some persons came along here with the book, one of whom pretends to have seen Angels, and assisted in translating the plates... The name of the person here, who pretends to have a divine mission, and to have seen and conversed with Angels, is Cowdray...” “ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Stylometric Analyses of the Book of Mormon: a Short History
    STYLOMETRIC ANALYSES OF THE BOOK OF MORMON: A SHORT HISTORY Photograph by Mark Philbrick. FROM THE EDITOR: What value do computerized studies of author styles contribute to the polemics and irenics that seem to per- petually swirl around the Book of Mormon? In this article, authors Roper, Fields, and Schaalje take a few short steps back to take a long look at what such studies can and cannot contribute, including the latest twist, nearest shrunken centroid (NSC) classification. The authors present eight serious flaws with the NSC study and then offer the results of their recent study using extended nearest shrunken centroid (ENSCl classification, which overcomes those flaws. Long-time readers of FARMS publications and those of the Neal A. Maxwell Institute will enjoy this short history. 28 VOLUME 21 • NUMBER 1 • 2012 MATTHEW ROPER, PAUL J. FIELDS, AND 6. BRUCE SCHAALJE laims about the authorship of the Book of Mor- in a text of unknown or questioned authorship and mon have a history as long as the book has been then comparing and contrasting those patterns to the Caround. To discredit Joseph Smith's descrip- patterns in texts of known authorship, the similari- tion of the book's origin, skeptics started proposing ties and dissimilarities between the textual patterns theories about who had written it even before it was can provide supporting evidence for or contradicting pubhshed in 1830.^ In 1834 Eber Howe proposed the evidence against an assertion of authorship. Spalding-Rigdon theory of Book of Mormon author- ship, which asserts that Sidney Rigdon plagiarized an unpublished fictional work by Solomon Spalding Anonymous writing, plagiarism, and the to produce the Book of Mormon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dangerous Man”
    MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” Episode 03 He Called Himself “A Dangerous Man” Slide 1 MormonLeaks.com 1 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” Alternative Accounts! Has “Old Come to Pass” come to life again?! He called himself “A Dangerous Man”! revelation! “Necessity is the mother of invention”! Institutional Response Smith and Rigdon Advent of The Last Dispensation! Slide 2 MormonLeaks.com 2 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” We can now explain about 2/3rd of the Book of Mormon.! King James Bible! But who wrote this?! Mainly Smith and Cowdery! religious Spalding! Slide 3 MormonLeaks.com 3 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” After retrieving Spalding manuscripts from the widow (Episode 2), Hurlbut made a news release in Smith’s hometown newspaper (Palmyra, New York): he had succeeded with “the object of his mission”. Slide 4 MormonLeaks.com 4 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” In the same press release, Hurlbut made an allegation.! Slide 5 MormonLeaks.com 5 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” One month later, a Pennsylvania newspaper added to these allegations and linked Rigdon to Pittsburgh… “The pretended religious character of the work has been superadded by some more modern hand – believed to be the notorious Rigdon.” Slide 6 The Wayne Sentinel; Palmyra, N.Y.; December 20, 1833. MormonLeaks.com 6 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” The Editor of the Pittsburgh Manufacturer reported:! “Although Joseph Smith signs himself as author and proprietor of the work, a man who a few years since lived in this city, and was known to many of our citizens under the appellation of Elder Rigdon, is suspected of being the author.” Slide 7 MormonLeaks.com 7 MormonLeaks.com – Episode 3 – He called himself “A Dangerous Man” But an Ohio newspaper had named Rigdon as the probable author three years before the allegations from New York and Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin, Doctrines and Dangers
    Y TATEMENT PREFATOR S . FOR a number of years I have been an interested student of Mormonism and have gathered many 1 1 8 facts concerning it . On Dec . 7, 99, I delivered two addresses on Mormonism in the church of A which I am pastor . large number who heard them , and many who did not hear them , have urged that they be published . In compliance with this m h de and I ave rewritten and greatly enlarged them , and in the interest of truth and true religion send them forth to the public . I have used only reliable authority , and have verified all statements made, as far as possible . Reference is duly made to the sources of information , and can be verified by those inclined to doubt any statement . In order to save space I have used a system of abbreviations which is easily understood . I am indebted to Rev . N . S . DD Burton , , for valuable suggestions and assist ance in the preparation of the pamphlet . Sincerely , 0 1 00 . Jan . 3 , 9 T . W . YOUNG . ABBREV AT N EX N I IO S AND PLA ATIONS . ’ McMHPUS McMaster s History of the People l I a V o . V . of the United St tes , BHAC Bacon ’ s History of American Christi ni a ty . M cMHSM McMillans Historical Sketch of Mor monism . ’ TOPM Tucker s Origin and Progress of Mor monism . ’ o HMU H we s Mormonism Unveiled . PGP Pearl of Great Price . DC Doctrine and Covenants . ’ ACAB Appleton s Cyclopedia of American Bi r h l o a V o .
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscript Found”
    Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 21 Number 2 Article 10 2009 Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found” Matthew Roper Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Roper, Matthew (2009) "Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found”," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 21 : No. 2 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol21/iss2/10 This Book of Mormon is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found” Author(s) Matthew Roper Reference FARMS Review 21/2 (2009): 179–223. ISSN 1550-3194 (print), 2156-8049 (online) Abstract Roper discusses the regularly recurring Spaulding- Rigdon theory of the origins of the Book of Mormon and disputes, once again, the claims that Joseph Smith based the Book of Mormon text on a manuscript by Solomon Spaulding. Roper refutes the existence of two Spaulding manuscripts and shows possible influences of Jedediah Morse’s Geography on Spaulding’s existing “Manuscript Story.” Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found” Matthew Roper ore than a century ago, the American Historical Magazine Mpublished a series of articles by a Salt Lake City attorney, Theodore Schroeder, in support of the Spalding-Rigdon theory of Book of Mormon origins.1 In the introduction to a four-part rebuttal to those articles, Brigham H.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Mormonism in American Culture Jeremy R
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 8-19-2011 Imagining the Saints: Representations of Mormonism in American Culture Jeremy R. Ricketts Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/amst_etds Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ricketts, eJ remy R.. "Imagining the Saints: Representations of Mormonism in American Culture." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/amst_etds/37 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jeremy R. Ricketts Candidate American Studies Departmelll This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Commillee: , Chairperson Alex Lubin, PhD &/I ;Se, tJ_ ,1-t C- 02-s,) Lori Beaman, PhD ii IMAGINING THE SAINTS: REPRESENTATIONS OF MORMONISM IN AMERICAN CULTURE BY JEREMY R. RICKETTS B. A., English and History, University of Memphis, 1997 M.A., University of Alabama, 2000 M.Ed., College Student Affairs, 2004 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy American Studies The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May 2011 iii ©2011, Jeremy R. Ricketts iv DEDICATION To my family, in the broadest sense of the word v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation has been many years in the making, and would not have been possible without the assistance of many people. My dissertation committee has provided invaluable guidance during my time at the University of New Mexico (UNM).
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Mormon Writings: Encountering a Topsy-Turvy Approach to Mormon Origins
    Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 16 Number 1 Article 2 1-1-2004 Editor's Introduction: Anti-Mormon Writings: Encountering a Topsy-Turvy Approach to Mormon Origins George L. Mitton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Mitton, George L. (2004) "Editor's Introduction: Anti-Mormon Writings: Encountering a Topsy-Turvy Approach to Mormon Origins," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 16 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol16/iss1/2 This Front Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Editor’s Introduction: Anti-Mormon Writings: Encountering a Topsy-Turvy Approach to Mormon Origins Author(s) George L. Mitton Reference FARMS Review 16/1 (2004): ix–xxxii. ISSN 1550-3194 (print), 2156-8049 (online) Abstract Introduction to the current issue, including editor’s picks. Mitton explains the need to address anti-Mormon texts and their authors, beginning in the early days of the church. It is important to give attention to Joseph’s own explanation and that of his close associates. Editor’s Introduction Anti-Mormon Writings: Encountering a Topsy-Turvy Approach to Mormon Origins George L. Mitton, associate editor He always conceived every subject on so comprehensive a scale, that he had not room in his head, to turn it over and examine both sides of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Mormon History in Illinois, 1839-48: an Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTRIBUTIONS NO. Sources of Mormon History in Illinois, 1839-48: An Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University Compiled by STANLEY B. KIMBALL 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, 1966 The Library SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Carbondale—Edwardsville Bibliographic Contributions No. 1 SOURCES OF MORMON HISTORY IN ILLINOIS, 1839-48 An Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, 1966 Compiled by Stanley B. Kimball Central Publications Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois ©2014 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, May, 1966 FOREWORD In the course of developing a book and manuscript collection and in providing reference service to students and faculty, a univeristy library frequently prepares special bibliographies, some of which may prove to be of more than local interest. The Bibliographic Contributions series, of which this is the first number, has been created as a means of sharing the results of such biblio­ graphic efforts with our colleagues in other universities. The contribu­ tions to this series will appear at irregular intervals, will vary widely in subject matter and in comprehensiveness, and will not necessarily follow a uniform bibliographic format. Because many of the contributions will be by-products of more extensive research or will be of a tentative nature, the series is presented in this format. Comments, additions, and corrections will be welcomed by the compilers. The author of the initial contribution in the series is Associate Professor of History of Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Illinois. He has been engaged in research on the Nauvoo period of the Mormon Church since he came to the university in 1959 and has published numerous articles on this subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging the Mormon Myth Maryanne Hafen Oglethorpe University, [email protected]
    Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 4 August 2016 Forging the Mormon Myth MaryAnne Hafen Oglethorpe University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur Part of the History of Religion Commons, Mormon Studies Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hafen, MaryAnne (2016) "Forging the Mormon Myth," Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur/vol6/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hafen: Forging the Mormon Myth Forging the Mormon Myth MaryAnne Hafen Senior Honors Thesis April 24, 2016 Published by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University, 2016 1 1 Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research, Vol. 6 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 4 Under the pretense of rare document collecting Mark Hofmann sold hundreds of forged documents to the Mormon Church and other private collectors for hundreds of thousands of dollars. His documents not only fooled world­class collectors and authenticators, they fit neatly into Mormon history. Though much of the information presented in them was falsified, his convincing handwriting, inclusion of meticulously researched historical minutiae, and ability to capture the voice of early Church members ensured that no one could believe they were fakes. A handful of key forgeries raised suspicions about Mormon origins and the historical tradition in which they had been retold earlier in the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ADOPTION of BIBLICAL ARCHAISMS in the BOOK of MORMON and OTHER 19TH CENTURY TEXTS by Gregory A
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Sounding sacred: The dopta ion of biblical archaisms in the Book of Mormon and other 19th century texts Gregory A. Bowen Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, and the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Bowen, Gregory A., "Sounding sacred: The dopta ion of biblical archaisms in the Book of Mormon and other 19th century texts" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. 945. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/945 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. SOUNDING SACRED: THE ADOPTION OF BIBLICAL ARCHAISMS IN THE BOOK OF MORMON AND OTHER 19TH CENTURY TEXTS by Gregory A. Bowen A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics West Lafayette, Indiana December 2016 ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL Dr. Mary Niepokuj, Chair Department of English Dr. Shaun Hughes Department of English Dr. John Sundquist Department of Linguistics Dr. Atsushi Fukada Department of Linguistics Approved by: Dr. Alejandro Cuza-Blanco Head of the Departmental Graduate Program iii For my father iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee for all they have done to make this project possible, especially my advisor, Dr. Mary Niepokuj, who tirelessly provided guidance and encouragement, and has been a fantastic example of what a teacher should be.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spalding Theory Then and Now
    THE SPALDING THEORY THEN AND NOW LESTER E. BUSH, JR. But now a most singular & delicate subject presented itself for consideration. Seven young women we had on board, as passengers, to visit certain friends they had in Britain—Three of them were ladies of rank, and the rest were healthy bucksom Lasses.—Whilst deliberating on this subject a mariner arose whom we called droll Tom—Hark ye shipmates says he, Whilst tossed on the foming billows what brave son of neptune had any more regard for a woman than a sturgeon, but now we are all safely anchored on Terra firma—our sails furled & ship keeled up, I have a huge longing for some of those rosy dames—But willing to take my chance with my shipmates—I propose that they should make their choise of husbands. The plan was instantly adopted. As the chois [sic] fell on the young women they held a consultation on the subject. & in a short time made known the result— Droll Tom was rewarded for his benevolent proposal with one of the most sprightly rosy dames in the company.—Three other of the most cheerful resolute mariners were chosen by the other three buxhum Lasses—The three young Ladies fixed their choise on the Captain the mate & myself. The young Lady who chose me for a partner was possessed of every attractive charm both of body & mind—We united heart & hand with the fairest prospect of enjoying every delight & satisfaction which are attendant on the connubial State. Thus ended the affair. You may well conceive our singular situation.
    [Show full text]