Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 21 Number 2 Article 10 2009 Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found” Matthew Roper Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Roper, Matthew (2009) "Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found”," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 21 : No. 2 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol21/iss2/10 This Book of Mormon is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected]. Title Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found” Author(s) Matthew Roper Reference FARMS Review 21/2 (2009): 179–223. ISSN 1550-3194 (print), 2156-8049 (online) Abstract Roper discusses the regularly recurring Spaulding- Rigdon theory of the origins of the Book of Mormon and disputes, once again, the claims that Joseph Smith based the Book of Mormon text on a manuscript by Solomon Spaulding. Roper refutes the existence of two Spaulding manuscripts and shows possible influences of Jedediah Morse’s Geography on Spaulding’s existing “Manuscript Story.” Myth, Memory, and “Manuscript Found” Matthew Roper ore than a century ago, the American Historical Magazine Mpublished a series of articles by a Salt Lake City attorney, Theodore Schroeder, in support of the Spalding-Rigdon theory of Book of Mormon origins.1 In the introduction to a four-part rebuttal to those articles, Brigham H.