DOCSLIB.ORG

Macroinvert List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macroinvert List Table 2. Summary of Macroinvertebrate Occcurrence Information, Squam Lakes Watershed, Page 1 of 6 New Hampshire. Order Group Family/(sub-family)/(tribe) Genus/(species) Region Tol. Feeding Value Group Acari Hydrachnidia Hydrachnidae Hydrachna (sp1) AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Hydrachnidae Hydrachna (sp2) AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Hydrachnidae Hydrachna (sp3) AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Hydrodromidae Hydrodroma AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Hydryphantidae Hydryphantes AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Limnesiidae Centrolimnesia AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Limnesiidae Limnesia (sp1)AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Limnesiidae Limnesia (sp2)AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Limnesiidae Tyrrellia AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Unionicolidae Neumania (distincta) AH 8PR Acari Hydrachnidia Unionicolidae Unionicola AH 8PR Aphanoneura Aeolosomatida Aeolosomatidae NR Aphanoneura Aeolosomatida Aeolosomatidae Aeolosoma NR Bivalvia Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae Musculium (securis) MA 5FC Bivalvia Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae Musculium (lacustre) MA 5FC Bivalvia Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae Pisidium sp. MA 8FC Bivalvia Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae Pisidium (casertanum) NW 8FC Bivalvia Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae Pisidium (walkeri) NW 8FC Bivalvia Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae Sphaerium (occidentale) NW 6FC BranchiopodaCladocera Sididae Sida NW 8FC BranchiopodaCladocera Sididae Latona NW 8FC Euhirudinea Hirudinea Erpobdellidae Erpobdella (punctata) NW 8PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Erpobdellidae Mooreobdella (melanostoma) SE 7.8 PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Erpobdellidae Mooreobdella (microstoma) SE 7.8 PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Glossiphoniidae Helobdella (fusca) NW 6PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Glossiphoniidae Helobdella (stagnalis) SE 6.7 PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Glossiphoniidae Marvinmeyeria (lucida) NW 8PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Glossiphoniidae Placobdella (papillifera) SE 9 PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Glossiphoniidae Placobdella (picta) NW 6PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Hirudinidae sp. NW 7PR Euhirudinea Hirudinea Piscicolidae Myzobdella (lugubris) AH 7PR Gastropoda Prosobranchia Hydrobiidae sp. MW 7SC Gastropoda Prosobranchia Hydrobiidae Probythinella (lacustris) MW 7SC Gastropoda Prosobranchia Limacidae Amnicola sp. MW 5SC Gastropoda Prosobranchia Limacidae Amnicola (grana) MA 8SC Gastropoda Prosobranchia Limacidae Amnicola (limosa) MA 8SC Gastropoda Prosobranchia Viviparidae Cipangopaludina (chinensis) NW 6SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Ancylidae Ferrissia (fragilis) MA 7SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Lymnaeidae Pseudosuccinea (columella) SE 7.2 SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Physidae Physella sp. MA 8SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Physidae Physella (gyrina) MA 8SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Physidae Physella (heterostropha) MA 8SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Planorbidae Gyraulus (circumstriatus) MA 7SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Planorbidae Helisoma (anceps) MA 7SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Planorbidae Menetus (dilatatus) MW 8.1 SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Planorbidae Planorbella NW 6SC Gastropoda Pulmonata Planorbidae Planorbella (campanulata) NW 6SC Insecta Arachnida Pisauridae NR Insecta Arachnida Pisauridae Dolomedes NR PR Insecta Coleoptera Dytiscidae Agabus MA 5PR Insecta Coleoptera Dytiscidae Agabinus MA 5PR SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION Table 2. Summary of Macroinvertebrate Occcurrence Information, Squam Lakes Watershed, Page 2 of 6 New Hampshire. Order Group Family/(sub-family)/(tribe) Genus/(species) Region Tol. Feeding Value Group Insecta Coleoptera Dytiscidae Celina MA 5 PR Insecta Coleoptera Dytiscidae Laccornis MA 5PR Insecta Coleoptera Elmidae Dubiraphia MA 6GC Insecta Coleoptera Elmidae Macronychus UMW 4OM Insecta Coleoptera Elmidae Microcylloepus NW 4GC Insecta Coleoptera Elmidae Promoresia MA 2SC Insecta Coleoptera Elmidae Stenelmis MA 5SC Insecta Coleoptera Gyrinidae Dineutus MA 4PR Insecta Coleoptera Gyrinidae Gyrinus MA 4PR Insecta Coleoptera Haliplidae Haliplus NW 7SH Insecta Coleoptera Hydraenidae Limnebius MW 5PR Insecta Coleoptera Hydrophilidae Hydrobius NW 8PR Insecta Coleoptera Limnichidae Lutrochus MW 2.9 GC Insecta Coleoptera Noteridae Hydrocanthus SE 6.9 PR Insecta Coleoptera Psephenidae Ectopria MA 5SC Insecta Coleoptera Ptilodactylidae Anchytarsus SE 3.8 SH Insecta Coleoptera Ptilodactylidae Stenocolus MA 5SH Insecta Coleoptera Scirtidae Cyphon MA 7SC Insecta Coleoptera Scirtidae Elodes MA 7SH Insecta Coleoptera Tenebrionidae sp. NR Insecta Diptera Ceratopogonidae sp. MW 5.7 PR Insecta Diptera Ceratopogonidae Bezzia MA 6GC Insecta Diptera Ceratopogonidae Probezzia MA 6PR Insecta Diptera Ceratopogonidae Sphaeromias NW 6PR Insecta Diptera Chaoboridae Chaoborus UMW 8PR Insecta Diptera Chironomidae sp. AH 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae) NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Asheum NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Chironomus MA 10 GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Cryptochirominous MA 8PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Cyphomella AH 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Dicrotendipes MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Einfeldia NW 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Endochironomous MA 10 GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Glyptotendipes MA 10 FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Hyporhygma NW 6SH Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Lauterborniella NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Microtendipes NW 6FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Parachironomous UMW 10 PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Paratendipes MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Polypedilum MA 6SH Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Pseudochironomus NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Robackia NW 7GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Stictochironomus UMW 9OM Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Chironomini) Xenochironomus NW 6PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Tanytarsini) Cladotanytarsus MA 7GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Tanytarsini) Micropsectra MA 7GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Tanytarsini) Paratanytarsus MA 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Tanytarsini) Sublettea NW 6FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Chironominae)(Tanytarsini) Tanytarsus MA 6FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Culicidae) Aedes MA 8FC SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION Table 2. Summary of Macroinvertebrate Occcurrence Information, Squam Lakes Watershed, Page 3 of 6 New Hampshire. Order Group Family/(sub-family)/(tribe) Genus/(species) Region Tol. Feeding Value Group Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Culicidae) Anopheles MA 6 FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Culicidae) Toxorhynchites NW 8PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Culicidae) Wyeomyia AH 10 FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Diamesinae) Boreoheptagyia NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Diamesinae) Potthastia (gaedii group) NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Diamesinae) Sympotthastia UMW 2GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Mycetophilidae) NR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Mycetophilidae) sp. NR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Nymphomyiidae) NR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Nymphomyiidae) sp. NR SC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae) sp. NW 5GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Brillia MA 5SH Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Crictopus MA 7SH Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Cricotopus (bicinctus) MA 7OM Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Georthocladius NW 5GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Gymnometriocnemus MA 7GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Limnophyes MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Nanocladius MA 3GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Orthocladius (Euorthocladius) NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Parachaetocladius MA 2GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Parametriocnemus MA 5GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Psectrocladius MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Orthocladiinae)(Orthocladiini) Xylotopus UMW 2GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Podonominae) Paraboreoclus NW 6GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Simuliidae) sp. NW 6FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Simuliidae) Simulium MA 6FC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tabanidae) sp. NW 8PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tabanidae) Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) sp. AH 6PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Ablabesmyia (sp1) MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Ablabesmyia (sp2) MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Ablabesmyia (sp3) MA 8GC Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Apsectrotanypus NW 7PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Brundiniella NW 6PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Clinotanypus MA 8PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Guttipelopia AH 6PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Hayesomyia (sanata) MW 4.6 PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Krenopelopia NW 7PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Labrundinia MW 3.8 PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Larsia MA 6PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Meropelopia MA 7PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Natarsia MA 8PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Paramarina MA 4PR Insecta Diptera Chrironomidae(Tanypodinae) Procladius
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Diptera: Chironomidae), with The
    Zootaxa 2497: 1–36 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The problems with Polypedilum Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae), with the description of Probolum subgen. n. OLE A. SÆTHER1, TROND ANDERSEN2,5, LUIZ C. PINHO3 & HUMBERTO F. MENDES4 1, 2 & 4Department of Natural History, Bergen Museum, University of Bergen, Pb. 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. 3Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP-USP, Avenida Bandeirantes, n. 3900, CEP 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Material and methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Systematics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Polypedilum subgenus Tripedilum Kieffer .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Spatial Distribution of Benthic Invertebrates In
    ABSTRACT SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES IN LAKE WINNEBAGO, WISCONSIN By Courtney L. Heling Numerous studies have examined the distribution of benthic invertebrates in lakes through space and time. However, most studies typically focus on single habitats or individual taxa rather than sampling comprehensively in multiple habitats in a single system. The focus of this study was to quantify the spatial distribution of the macroinvertebrate taxa present in three major lake zones (profundal, offshore reef, and littoral) in Lake Winnebago, Wisconsin, with a particular emphasis on chironomid distribution, and to determine what factors drove patterns in variation. The profundal zone was sampled for two consecutive years in August to determine if changes in spatial variation occurred from one year to the next. Using a variety of sampling methods, invertebrates were collected from all three zones in 2013 and the profundal zone in 2014. Additionally, numerous physical and biological variables were measured at each sampling site. Benthic invertebrate densities ranged from 228 to 66,761 individuals per m2 and varied among lake zones and substrates. Zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) were numerically dominant in both the offshore reef and littoral zones, while chironomids and oligochaetes comprised approximately 75% of profundal invertebrates sampled. Principal components analysis (PCA) showed that chironomid community structure differed highly among the three major lake zones. The littoral and offshore reef zones had the highest chironomid taxa richness, while the profundal zone, where Procladius spp. and Chironomus spp. were dominant, had lower richness. Chironomid density and community structure exhibited spatial variation within the profundal zone. The abundance of chironomids was correlated with several habitat variables, including organic matter content of the sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chironominae 8.1
    CHIRONOMINAE 8.1 SUBFAMILY CHIRONOMINAE 8 DIAGNOSIS: Antennae 4-8 segmented, rarely reduced. Labrum with S I simple, palmate or plumose; S II simple, apically fringed or plumose; S III simple; S IV normal or sometimes on pedicel. Labral lamellae usually well developed, but reduced or absent in some taxa. Mentum usually with 8-16 well sclerotized teeth; sometimes central teeth or entire mentum pale or poorly sclerotized; rarely teeth fewer than 8 or modified as seta-like projections. Ventromental plates well developed and usually striate, but striae reduced or vestigial in some taxa; beard absent. Prementum without dense brushes of setae. Body usually with anterior and posterior parapods and procerci well developed; setal fringe not present, but sometimes with bifurcate pectinate setae. Penultimate segment sometimes with 1-2 pairs of ventral tubules; antepenultimate segment sometimes with lateral tubules. Anal tubules usually present, reduced in brackish water and marine taxa. NOTESTES: Usually the most abundant subfamily (in terms of individuals and taxa) found on the Coastal Plain of the Southeast. Found in fresh, brackish and salt water (at least one truly marine genus). Most larvae build silken tubes in or on substrate; some mine in plants, dead wood or sediments; some are free- living; some build transportable cases. Many larvae feed by spinning silk catch-nets, allowing them to fill with detritus, etc., and then ingesting the net; some taxa are grazers; some are predacious. Larvae of several taxa (especially Chironomus) have haemoglobin that gives them a red color and the ability to live in low oxygen conditions. With only one exception (Skutzia), at the generic level the larvae of all described (as adults) southeastern Chironominae are known.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Limnichidae and the Lutrochidae (Coleoptera) of the World
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 15, No.3, September, 2001 151 A checklist of the Limnichidae and the Lutrochidae (Coleoptera) of the world P. J. Spangler, C. L. Staines, P.M. Spangler, and S.L. Staines Department of Entomology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC 20560 Abstract. A checklist of the world species of Limnichidae (35 genera, 345 species) and Lutrochidae (1 genus, 11 species) is presented. The author, year of publication and page number, synonyms, distribution by country, and a terminal bibliography are given for each genus and species. Biological information is also reviewed. Introduction scribed the species and adult behavior of Lutrochus arizonicus Brown and Murvosh. Hilsenhoff and The Limnichidae Erichson (1847) and Lutro­ Schmude (1992) reported that adults of L. laticeps chidae Kasap and Crowson (1975) are small semi­ Casey (1893) were found in small to large, warm, aquatic beetles; adults of both families most fre­ calcareous streams; that adults oviposit on sub­ quently live in riparian habitats. Both families merged wood or on travertine rocks; and larvae were previously assigned to the superfamily Dry­ were aquatic and were collected on the travertine opoidea (Crowson, 1978); however, they are now rocks. placed in the Byrrhoidea (Lawrence and Newton, Previous world catalogs that included the lim­ 1995). From 1975 through 1993, D. P. Wooldridge nichids and lutrochids are by Zaitzev (1910) and published numerous limnichid descriptions and von Dalla Torre (1911) who recorded 11 genera and revisions but much systematic work remains to be 75 species. Blackwelder (1944) published a check­ done for the Limnichidae, especially in the tropical list of the Coleoptera of Mexico, Central America, regions of the Eastern Hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Some Species in Tribe Chironomini
    Comments on some species in tribe Chironomini Henk Vallenduuk Prof. Gerbrandystraat 10, 5463BK Veghel, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] During the work of identifying Chironomini collected at various localities in the Netherlands, I made some observations in species interpretation that I think are useful to share with the readers of the Chironomus Newsletter on Chironomidae Research. I hope that in particular ecologists and other users of larval identi- fication keys will find the below comments helpful. Reinterpretation of some species in Chironomus Chironomus macani I obtained males and females from single-reared larvae. Peter Langton identified them as Chironomus (Chaetolabis) macani Freeman, 1948 and confirmed that the male imagines are conspecific with the holo- type of Chironomus (Chaetolabis) macani, held in the Natural History Museum in London, but not with those of Prof. Wolfgang Wülker presently kept in the Zoologische Staatssammlung, München. The Wül- ker’s specimens thus do not belong to the true C. macani and should be renamed (Langton & Vallenduuk 2013). The larvae of both species are morphologically very similar but can be differentiated. Chironomus dorsalis Chironomus (Lobochironomus) longipes Staeger, 1839 was listed as a junior synonym of Chironomus (Lo- bochironomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 by Spies & Sæther (2004). However, the name Chironomus (Chi- ronomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 has also been used (e.g. Strenzke 1959). Chironomus dorsalis Meigen sensu Strenzke is a misidentification and synonymous withC. alpestris Goetghebuer, 1934 (Sæther & Spies 2013). I reared single larvae of C. dorsalis Meigen and C. alpestris Goetghebuer. It appears that the imago of C. longipes described by Shilova (1980) as Einfeldia does not match with C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamilies of Larval Chironomidae
    Envlronment Canada Environnement Canada Fisheries Service des pêches .1 and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer L .' 1 '; ( 1 l r A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamil ies of Larval Chironomidae: ,1"'--- The Chironominae and Tanypodlnae . : - - . ) / Found .in Benthic Studies Jin the / r~---.-_ c L___ r - - '" - .Ç"'''''-. Winnipeg River in the Vicinity ot Pine Falls, Manitoba in 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart J.S. Loch Technical Report Series No. CEN/T-73-12 Resource Management Branch Central Region DEPARTMÈNT OF THE ENViRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERViCE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Reports Series No. CEN/T-73-12 A guide for the identification of two subfami lies of larva l Chironomidae~ the Chironominae and Tanypodinae found in benthic studies in the Winnipeg Riv~r in the vicinity of Pine Falls, Manitoba, in 1971 and 1972. by: P.L. Stewart qnd J.S. Loch ERRATA Page13: The caption for Figure 5A should read: Mentum and ventromental plates..•... instead of: submentum and ventromental plates..•.. Page 14: The caption for Figure 5B should read: Mentum and ventromental plates . instead of: submentum and ventromental plates.... DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Report Series No: CEN/T-73-12 A GUIDE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF IWO SUBF.AMILIES OF LARVM.... CHIRONOMIDAE: THE CHIRONOMINAE AND TANYPODINAE FOUND IN BENTHIC STUDIES IN THE WINNIPEG RIVER IN THE vrCINITY OF PINE FM....LS, MANITOBA IN 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart and J. S. Loch Resource Management Branch Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region, Winnipeg November 1973 i ABSTRACT Identifying characteristics of the genera of two subfamilies of larvae of the midge family, C~onomldae (Vlpt~a), the C~ono­ mlnae and the Tanypodlnae, are presented with illustrations for the purpose of simplifying identification of these two groups by novice and more experienced personnel involved in assessment of benthic faunal composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 2
    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: Updated Checklist, Endemicity Hotspots, Threats and Conservation Status
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e912909 Taxonomy and systematics The freshwater snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: updated checklist, endemicity hotspots, threats and conservation status Los caracoles dulceacuícolas (Mollusca: Gastropoda) de México: listado actualizado, hotspots de endemicidad, amenazas y estado de conservación Alexander Czaja a, *, Iris Gabriela Meza-Sánchez a, José Luis Estrada-Rodríguez a, Ulises Romero-Méndez a, Jorge Sáenz-Mata a, Verónica Ávila-Rodríguez a, Jorge Luis Becerra-López a, Josué Raymundo Estrada-Arellano a, Gabriel Fernando Cardoza-Martínez a, David Ramiro Aguillón-Gutiérrez a, Diana Gabriela Cordero-Torres a, Alan P. Covich b a Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Av.Universidad s/n, Fraccionamiento Filadelfia, 35010 Gómez Palacio, Durango, Mexico b Institute of Ecology, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 East Green Street, Athens, GA 30602-2202, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] (A. Czaja) Received: 14 April 2019; accepted: 6 November 2019 Abstract We present an updated checklist of native Mexican freshwater gastropods with data on their general distribution, hotspots of endemicity, threats, and for the first time, their estimated conservation status. The list contains 193 species, representing 13 families and 61 genera. Of these, 103 species (53.4%) and 12 genera are endemic to Mexico, and 75 species are considered local endemics because of their restricted distribution to very small areas. Using NatureServe Ranking, 9 species (4.7%) are considered possibly or presumably extinct, 40 (20.7%) are critically imperiled, 30 (15.5%) are imperiled, 15 (7.8%) are vulnerable and only 64 (33.2%) are currently stable.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Polypedilum Kieffer, 1912 from Ecuador, with Description of a New Species
    SPIXIANA 43 1 127-136 München, Oktober 2020 ISSN 0341-8391 New records of Polypedilum Kieffer, 1912 from Ecuador, with description of a new species (Diptera, Chironomidae) Viktor Baranov, Luiz Carlos Pinho, Milena Roszkowska & Łukasz Kaczmarek Baranov, V., Pinho, L. C., Roszkowska, M. & Kaczmarek, Ł. 2020. New records of Polypedilum Kieffer, 1912 from Ecuador, with description of a new species (Di­ ptera, Chironomidae). Spixiana 43 (1): 127-136. Polypedilum darwini sp. nov. is described from Ecuadorian Amazonia based on the adult male. The new species is similar to P. feridae Bidawid­Kafka, 1996 in gen­ eral morphology. Additionally Polypedilum salwiti Bidawid­Kafka, 1996 is recorded for the first time outside of Brazil. Viktor Baranov (corresponding author), LMU Munich Biocenter, Department of Biology II, 82152 Planegg­Martinsried, Germany; e­mail: [email protected]­ muenchen.de. Former address: Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural His­ tory Museum Frankfurt, Clamecystr. 12, 63571 Gelnhausen, Germany. Luiz Carlos Pinho, Center of Biological Sciences, Department of Zoology and Ecology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88040­901, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil; e­mail: [email protected] Milena Roszkowska, Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology/Department of Bioenergetics, Adam Mickiewicz University Poznañ, 61­614 Poznañ, Poland; e­mail: [email protected] Łukasz Kaczmarek, Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznañ, 61­614 Poznañ, Poland; e­mail: [email protected] Introduction insects throughout the world (Ferrington 2007). Despite unprecedented rates of new chironomid The Neotropical realm is a well­known hotspot of taxa descriptions from the Neotropics in the last two insect biodiversity, with Brazil alone assumed to decades, very large numbers of species are expected be home for at least 500 000 species of Hexapoda to have remained unknown due to the family’s high (Rafael et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalog of the Coleóptera of America North of Mexico X
    I Ag84Ah A CATALOG OF THE COLEÓPTERA OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO X 1^ FAMILY: LIMNICHIDAE f.--;.- :?: -°7^ :3 0T >-y o- rV^o "0 \;.0 VC r- ■\ :x) -o t/^ 'J^ NAL_Digitizi ngProj ect fell ah52948 ,^ UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE PREPARED BY ÉTl DEPARTMENT OF( HANDBOOK ^£'^'fo^>I^'^^^ ^^ AGRICULTURE NUMBER 529-48 ÇÎ^F.'^?^^ SERVICE FAMILIES OF COLEóPTERA IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO Fascicle ' Family Year issued Fascicle ' Family Year issued Fascicle ' F o m il y Year issued 1_.. _ -Cupedidae ____ 1979 45... ..Chelonariidae ... 98.. ...Endomychidae __ 2_- ..Micromalthidae . 1982 46... ..Callirhipidae ... 100- ...Lathridiidae 3_....Carabidae 47._.—Hetcroceridae .. 1978 102.. ...BiphylHdae 4_....Rhysodidae -___ 1985 48... ..Limnichidae 1986 103.. ...Byturidae 5_..„Amphizoidae --- 1984 49_....Dryopidae 1983 104- ...Mycetophagidae 6_..--Haliplidae 50-_- ..Elmidae 1983 105.- ...Ciidae 1982 8_....Noteridae 51.....Buprestidae 107.. ...Prostomidae 9_....Dytiscidae 52... Cebrionidae 109-...Colydiidae 10_....Gyrinidae 53-_. ..Elateridae -..Monommatidae 13-....Sphaeriidae 54.....Throscidae 110- 14-....Hydroscaphidae 55....-Cerophytidae ... 111-. ...Cephaloidae 15... Hydraenidae 56... ..Perothopidae ... 112.. ...Zopheridae 16-...Hydrophilidae _. 57....-Eucnemidae ... 115.. ...Tenebrionidae _. 17_.. Georyssidae 58 .. ..Telegeusidae __. 116.. ...Alleculidae 18..—.Sphaeritidae 61....-Phengodidae ... 117. ..Lagriidae 20_....Histeridae 62 ..Lampyridae 118 SalDÎneidae 21.....Ptiliidae 63... ..Cantharidae 119_. ...Mycteridae 22.. Limulodidae 64...-.Lycidae 120.. ...Pyrochroidae _.- 1983 23.....Dasyceridae 65.....Derodontidae ... 121.....Othniidae 24.....Micropeplidae — 1984 66.....Nosodendridae . 122.. Inopeplidae 25 --Leptinidae 67.. -.Dermestidae 123.. -.-Oedemeridae .._ 26.....Leiodidae 69_. -.Ptinidae 124.. ...Melandryidae ._ 27.....Scydmaenidae .. 70.....Anobiidae 1982 125- ...Mordellidae 28.....Silphidae 71.. -.Bostrichidae 126.. Rhipiphoridae .. 29.._._Scaphidiidae 72.....Lyctidae 127 Meloidae 30. —Staphylinidae ... 74....-Trogositidae 128.. Anthicidae 31..—.Pselaphidae 76.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mollusca) of the Slovak Republic
    Vol. 15(2): 49–58 CHECKLIST OF THE MOLLUSCS (MOLLUSCA) OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC TOMÁŠ ÈEJKA*, LIBOR DVOØÁK, MICHAL HORSÁK, JOZEF ŠTEFFEK *Correspondence: Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-84506 Bratislava, Slovak Republic (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: The checklist of 245 mollusc species known so far from the Slovak Republic is presented, plus 11 species limited to greenhouses or thermal waters. Critical comments on species erroneously mentioned in re- cent publications from Slovakia are included. KEY WORDS: Mollusca, checklist, Slovak Republic INTRODUCTION Research of Slovak molluscs started at the begin- cal evaluation of the previously published checklists ning of the 20th century (CSIKI 1918). In the first half (BANK et al. 2001, ŠTEFFEK &GREGO 2002). We deci- of the 20th century J. F. BABOR and later also his col- ded to use the monograph Molluscs of Slovakia (LI- league J. PETRBOK worked on the Slovak malaco- SICKÝ 1991) as the most suitable baseline because it fauna. Unfortunately their publications were not sys- contains the most recent reliable list of Slovak tematic and especially not critical enough, resulting molluscs. Therefore the original literature sources in erroneous records of some mollusc species in Slo- are given for all the species first recorded in the Slo- vakia (LISICKÝ 1991). The situation changed after vak Republic after 1982. World War II. The work of the new generation of The checklist of Slovak molluscs published by ŠTEF- malacologists resulted in a reliable knowledge about FEK &GREGO (2002) has several shortcomings. The the fauna. The entire research was dominated by the authors uncritically adopted many taxa from the work of V.
    [Show full text]