DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 78 Thursday, No. 192 October 3, 2013 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Taylor’s Checkerspot Butterfly and Streaked Horned Lark; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:36 Oct 02, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\03OCR3.SGM 03OCR3 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES3 61506 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR by appointment, at the Washington Fish Washington; and in Benton County in and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER Oregon. Fish and Wildlife Service INFORMATION CONTACT). Any additional • Approximately 4,629 ac (1,873 ha) tools or supporting information that we in two units for the streaked horned lark 50 CFR Part 17 developed for this critical habitat in Grays Harbor, Pierce, Pacific, and [Docket No. FWS–R1–ES2013–0009; designation will also be available at the Wahkiakum Counties in Washington; 4500030114] Fish and Wildlife Service Web site and and in Clatsop, Columbia, Marion, Polk, field office set out above, and may also and Benton Counties in Oregon. RIN 1081–AZ36 be included at http:// We have prepared an economic www.regulations.gov. analysis of the designation of critical Endangered and Threatened Wildlife habitat. We have prepared an analysis FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken and Plants; Designation of Critical of the probable economic impacts of the Berg, Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Habitat for Taylor’s Checkerspot critical habitat designations and related Service, Washington Fish and Wildlife Butterfly and Streaked Horned Lark factors. We announced the availability Office, 510 Desmond Drive, Suite 102, of the draft economic analysis (DEA) in AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Lacey, WA 98503–1263; by telephone the Federal Register on April 3, 2012 Interior. 360–753–9440; or by facsimile 360– (78 FR 20074), allowing the public to ACTION: Final rule. 753–9405. Persons who use a provide comments on our analysis. We telecommunications device for the deaf SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and have incorporated the comments and (TDD) may call the Federal Information Wildlife Service, designate critical have completed the final economic Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. habitat for the Taylor’s checkerspot analysis (FEA) concurrently with this butterfly (Euphydryas editha taylori) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: final determination. and streaked horned lark (Eremophila Executive Summary Peer review and public comment. We alpestris strigata) under the Endangered sought comments from independent Why We Need to Publish a Rule. Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). specialists to ensure that our Under the Endangered Species Act In total, approximately 1,941 acres (786 designation is based on scientifically (Act), any species that is determined to hectares) in Island, Clallam, and sound data and analyses. We obtained be an endangered or threatened species Thurston Counties in Washington, and opinions from two knowledgeable requires critical habitat to be designated, in Benton County in Oregon, fall within individuals with scientific expertise to to the maximum extent prudent and the boundaries of the critical habitat review our technical assumptions and determinable. Elsewhere in today’s designation for Taylor’s checkerspot analysis, and to determine whether or issue of the Federal Register, we list the butterfly. Approximately 4,629 acres not we had used the best available Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly as an (1,873 hectares) in Grays Harbor, information. These peer reviewers endangered species and the streaked Pacific, and Wahkiakum Counties in concurred with our methods and horned lark as a threatened species. Washington, and in Clatsop, Columbia, conclusions, and provided additional Designations and revisions of critical Marion, Polk, and Benton Counties in information, clarifications, and habitat can only be completed by Oregon, fall within the boundaries of suggestions to improve this final rule. issuing a rule. Information we received from peer the critical habitat designation for Section 4(b)(2) of the Act states that review is incorporated in this final streaked horned lark. The effect of this the Secretary shall designate critical designation. We also considered all regulation is to designate critical habitat habitat on the basis of the best available comments and information we received for the Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly scientific data after taking into from the public during the comment and streaked horned lark under the Act consideration the economic impact, period. for the conservation of the species. national security impact, and any other DATES: This rule is effective on relevant impact of specifying any Previous Federal Actions November 4, 2013. particular area as critical habitat. All previous Federal actions are ADDRESSES: This final rule is available Additionally, the Act sets forth the described in the listing determination on the Internet at http:// requirement to finalize rules within 1 for the Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly www.regulations.gov and at the year of proposal. and streaked horned lark, which is Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. This rule designates critical habitat for published elsewhere in today’s Federal Comments and materials we received, as the Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly and Register. well as supporting documentation used streaked horned lark. On October 11, in preparing this final rule, are available 2012, we published in the Federal Background for public inspection, by appointment, Register (77 FR 61937) a proposed rule For information related to the listing during normal business hours, at: U.S. to list the Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly of the species, see the final rule listing Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington and streaked horned lark and to Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly as an Fish and Wildlife Office, 510 Desmond designate critical habitat for these endangered species and the streaked Drive SE., Suite 102, Lacey, WA 98503– subspecies. The critical habitat areas we horned lark as a threatened species, 1263. The office can be reached by are designating in this final rule which is published elsewhere in today’s telephone at 360–753–9440 or by constitute our current best assessment of Federal Register. facsimile at 360–753–9008. the areas that meet the definition of The coordinates or plot points or both critical habitat for the Taylor’s Summary of Comments and from which the maps are generated are checkerspot butterfly and streaked Recommendations included in the administrative record horned lark. We are designating as We requested written comments from for this critical habitat designation and critical habitat: the public on the proposed designation are available at http:// • Approximately 1,941 acres (ac) (786 of critical habitat for the Taylor’s www.regulations.gov at Docket No. hectares (ha)) in three units for the checkerspot butterfly and streaked FWS–R1–ES–2013–0009 and at http:// Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly in Island, horned lark during two comment www.fws.gov/wafwo/TCBSHL.html, or, Clallam, and Thurston Counties in periods. The first comment period, VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:36 Oct 02, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR3.SGM 03OCR3 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 61507 associated with the publication of the incorporated into the final rule as our documents. In this case the peer proposed rule (77 FR 61937; October 11, appropriate. reviewer has offered his opinion on a 2012), opened on October 11, 2012, and non-scientific issue; however, Comments From Peer Reviewers closed on December 10, 2012. We then management agreements are not a made available the draft economic In accordance with our peer review requirement for critical habitat analysis (DEA) of the proposed critical policy published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR designation. We will seek agreements habitat designation and reopened the 34270), we solicited expert opinion with land owners and managers on comment period on the proposed rule from four knowledgeable individuals lands designated as critical habitat and for an additional 30 days from April 3, with scientific expertise that included on other lands that are important to 2013, to May 3, 2013 (78 FR 20074; familiarity with the Taylor’s conservation of the streaked horned lark April 3, 2013). We also contacted checkerspot butterfly and its habitats, as we initiate a recovery program for the appropriate Federal, State, tribal, biological needs, and threats, and from bird, but such agreements are not county, and local agencies; scientific three knowledgeable individuals with relevant to the designation of critical organizations; and other interested scientific expertise that included habitat unless we are considering parties and invited them to comment on familiarity with the streaked horned lark whether to exclude an area from the the proposed rule and the draft and its habitats, biological needs, and designation pursuant to section 4(b)(2) economic analysis. We held three public threats. We received responses from two of the Act. We did consider the information workshops and a public of the peer reviewers for the Taylor’s additional sites the peer reviewer hearing in April 2013, on the proposed checkerspot butterfly. Both peer suggested should have been proposed as rule to list the subspecies
Recommended publications
  • DELAWARE OH 2019 Back

    DELAWARE OH 2019 Back

    R O N 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 D PLEASANT HILL CEMETERY Gallant Woods Preserve A R D D 33 O O 215 A 1 2 KW A R R SUNBURY / GALENA BLAYNEY RD DELAWARE I 35 K TR-68 CLEAR RUN RD CLEAR RUN RD CASE RD Bent Tree GC RD TROY STONEBROOK DR 42 BERKSHIRE TR-289 TR-218 N GALENA RD TR-56 E RD TROY M O E 7 N WILSON RD R TERE T Y P N THREE B’S & K RD K & B’S THREE N DELAWARE L LONGHORN DR CORNER RD T 34 CREEK RD 23 N TR-53 E FOURWINDS DR FOURWINDS 36 B ................... ........................ ............................ ...................... ................................ ....................... ......................... ................. .................... PHOENICIAN WY AE74 CATHERINE ST G87 HEATHER DR K87 PEACHBLOW RD R92 WEISER AV I88 GALLOWAY DR AB61 THRUSH RILL AA64 HAWTHORNE CT W E63 HARROGATE CT AD82 k Run R FOURWINDS CT BERKSHIRE e ASHLEY POLARIS GRAND DR ............. AC74 E CENTRAL AV ............................ G90 HEDGEROW LN ........................ G84 PEBBLE PL ............................... H84 WELLS ST ................................. F90 GALENA GARDNER DR ........................ AC64 TILLER DR .............................. AD62 HAWTHORNE RD ..................... E63 HARROGATE LP E ................. AC85 HILLS-MILLER RD 65 e HILLS-MILLER RD TR-99943 HILLS-MILLER RD CEMETERY 61 r B TR-99976 R C POLARIS GREEN DR ............. AB76 W CENTRAL AV ............................. F86 E HEFFNER ST ............................ E87 PECAN CT ................................ M87 WELSHIRE CT .......................... F84 GATEWAY LN .........................
  • JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016

    JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016

    Habitat and Species Cooperative Restoration Program Joint Base Lewis-McChord Center for Natural Lands Management JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016 Submitted to: Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fish and Wildlife Program Submitted by: Adrian Wolf, Gary Slater and Hannah Anderson Center for Natural Lands Management 120 Union Avenue Southeast Olympia WA, 98501 Phone: 360-584-2538 Joint Base Lewis-McChord is a key military installation and the most important conservation area in the Puget Trough region. The Center for Natural Lands Management strives to assist Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the conservation of its natural resources within the framework of the military training mandate. Joint Base Lewis- McChord and its conservation partners have shared interests because: Healthy natural ecosystems are essential for realistic and sustainable training lands. Rare species recovery throughout the region reduces the burden of recovery on any single landowner or site. Pest plants harm natural areas and reduce their suitability for military training. Page 2 Table of Contents Project Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Goals and Objectives ...........................................................................................................
  • Specifications and Contract Documents

    Specifications and Contract Documents

    SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Killeen, Texas Robert Gray Army Airfield (RGAAF) Security Surveillance Improvements at Robert Gray Army Airfield City of Killeen RFP No. 19-10 ISSUED FOR RFP Garver Project No. 17181082 Project Sponsors: Prepared For: City of Killeen November 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 SECTION I. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 SECTION 000001 CERTIFICATIONS SECURITY SURVEILLANCE IMPROVEMENTS AT ROBERT GRAY ARMY AIRFIELD PROJECT GARVER PROJECT NO. 17181082 CITY OF KILLEEN RFP NO. 19-10 I hereby certify that the applicable portions of this project plans and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Engineer under the laws of the State of Texas. APPLICABLE DIVISION OR SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY Derek Mayo, P.E. General Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed: Matthew LeMay, P.E. Electrical Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed: Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP 000001-1 November 6, 2018 SECTION 000001 CERTIFICATIONS APPLICABLE DIVISION OR SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY Michael A. Guzik, P.E. CTI Telecom Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed GARVER, LLC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: TX ENGINEERING REGISTRATION NO. F-5713 TX ARCHITECTURAL REGISTRATION NO. 21507 CTI CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: TX REGISTERED CONSULTING FIRM B-17368 Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No.
  • JBLM Streaked Horned Lark Surveys and Monitoring 2016

    JBLM Streaked Horned Lark Surveys and Monitoring 2016

    Habitat and Species Cooperative Restoration Program Joint Base Lewis-McChord Center for Natural Lands Management JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2016 W911S8-15-2-0001 W911S8-15-2-0004 W911S8-15-2-0012 W911S8-16-2-0010 CNLM Task Orders #G1117, G1118, G1131, G1155 March 2017 Submitted to: Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fish and Wildlife Program Submitted by: Adrian Wolf, Gary Slater and Jerrmaine Treadwell Center for Natural Lands Management 120 Union Avenue Southeast Olympia WA, 98501 Phone: 360-584-2538 Joint Base Lewis-McChord is a key military installation and the most important conservation area in the Puget Trough region. The Center for Natural Lands Management strives to assist Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the conservation of its natural resources within the framework of the military training mandate. Joint Base Lewis- McChord and its conservation partners have shared interests because: Healthy natural ecosystems are essential for realistic and sustainable training lands. Rare species recovery throughout the region reduces the burden of recovery on any single landowner or site. Pest plants harm natural areas and reduce their suitability for military training. Page i Table of Contents Project Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Goals and Objectives ...........................................................................................................
  • Herreshoff Collection Guide [PDF]

    Herreshoff Collection Guide [PDF]

    Guide to The Haffenreffer-Herreshoff Collection The Design Records of The Herreshoff Manufacturing Company Bristol, Rhode Island The Francis Russell Hart Nautical Collection Kurt Hasselbalch Frances Overcash & Angela Reddin The Francis Russell Hart Nautical Collections MIT Museum Cambridge, Massachusetts © 1997 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. Published by The MIT Museum 265 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 3 Introduction 5 Historical Sketch 6 Scope and Content 8 Series Listing 10 Series Description I: Catalog Cards 11 Series Description II: Casting Cards (pattern use records) 12 Series Description III: HMCo Construction Record 13 Series Description IV: Offset Booklets 14 Series Description V: Drawings 26 Series Description VI: Technical and Business Records 38 Series Description VII: Half-Hull Models 55 Series Description VIII: Historic Microfilm 56 Description of Database 58 2 Acknowledgments The Haffenreffer-Herreshoff Project and this guide were made possible by generous private donations. Major funding for the Haffenreffer-Herreshoff Project was received from the Haffenreffer Family Fund, Mr. and Mrs. J. Philip Lee, Joel White (MIT class of 1954) and John Lednicky (MIT class of 1944). We are most grateful for their support. This guide is dedicated to the project donors, and to their belief in making material culture more accessible. We also acknowledge the advice and encouragement given by Maynard Bray, the donors and many other friends and colleagues. Ellen Stone, Manager of the Ships Plans Collection at Mystic Seaport Museum provided valuable cataloging advice. Ben Fuller also provided helpful consultation in organizing database structure. Lastly, I would like to acknowledge the excellent work accomplished by the three individuals who cataloged and processed the entire Haffenreffer-Herrehsoff Collection.
  • September 11,1865

    September 11,1865

    : __ ----r.'----~~--- I _ _ __-_ __ JL.-- n- I'TM TV! .'■»» T1UT1 r.Z.r- T'-J-V ... .... I r- 'lU a XKQ&3AY&X._ H t 7‘*- ■■ • Or. ,, .j ___ ''*■■' / '.•---- -’i iiiiiiil ‘Jin n: '. ) — ■ ■■■ ■ JlLLir1*1—WMr .... ... — ^ —wn ___ —■■■•!■______~ ~~ -^__ rMitsheM June S3,1892. Tot. 4. MONDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 11, 1865 „ PORTLAND, Terms $8 per _ annum, in advance. ___ PRESS: A STOBY ABOUT DR. KANE. PORTLAND DAILY Miscellaneous. Miscellaneous. F°r Sale and to JOHN F. The Rochester (If. Y.) Union is responsible I Let. Wants, Lost and Found. ANDERSON, JOHN T. GILMAN, Editor, Business Cards. for the following not very probable story: SURVEYOR & CIVIL exchange street, by SALE ENGINEER published at szj “A book within a short IMPORTANT For Sale OFFICE, will probably appear REASONS or to Let. Wanted. CODMAN BLOCK the _ A. & GO. time, the facts in history of Dr. mch 17 dAwtf T N. FOSTER giving “ven octave PI' SALESMAN in the retail Dry Goods Business; --.-lem -eStteet. Business Cards. which have hith- one is Kane, the Arctic navigator, ANo%ra°nd'hand A who well acquainted with the busines8 It is address wni lind a CHAS. B. The Portland Daily Press is published at erto been shrouded in mystery. true that Persons r^^^FOTMxticaiars, permanent situation by addressing Box W*y Should Timber Saw Mills W' W' K-” 106 Portland Post Oiiice. MERRILL, DR. H. If. in advance. he was tor engaged to Miss Margaretta Limits, Ane 29—dlw Transcript Office, SMALL, $8.00 per year years Aug Portland, Me.
  • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview

    Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview

    Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview July 18, 2012 Contents . Definitions . Facts & Figures . UAS Budgets and Spending . Trends and Challenges . Future of Unmanned Aerial Systems . Summary and Recommendations . Appendix A: DoD UAS Acquisition Costs . Appendix B: DoD Current and Future Domestic UAS Locations 2 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definitions . Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) . Refers to systems whose components include the necessary equipment, network, and personnel to control an unmanned aircraft . UAS is a broader term that includes equipment, networks, and personnel in addition to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) . Refers to a powered aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operation, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle life, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload . Commonly known as “drones”. In practice, the terms UAS and UAV are often used interchangeably Source: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011. 3 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Facts & Figures . Dept. of Defense (DoD) spending on UAS has increased from $284 million in FY00 to $3.9 billion in FY12 . DoD’s unmanned aircraft inventory increased more than 40-fold from 167 aircraft in 2002 to nearly 7,500 in 2010 . In 2009, DoD completed almost 500,000 UAS flight hours just in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom . In May 2010, unmanned systems surpassed one million flight hours . In November 2010 unmanned systems achieved one million combat hours Sources: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011; CRS Report R42136, “Unmanned Aerial Systems,” January 3, 2012; Dept.
  • Annals Section4 Yachts.Pdf

    Annals Section4 Yachts.Pdf

    CHAPTER 4 Early Yachts IN THE R.V.Y.C. FROM 1903 TO ABOUT 1933 The following list of the first sail yachts in the Club cannot be said to be complete, nevertheless it provides a record of the better known vessels and was compiled from newspaper files of The Province, News-Advertiser, The World and The Sun during the first three decades of the Club activities. Vancouver newspapers gave very complete coverage of sailing events in that period when yacht racing commanded wide public interest. ABEGWEIT—32 ft. aux. Columbia River centerboard cruising sloop built at Steveston in 1912 for H. C. Shaw, who joined the Club in 1911. ADANAC-18 ft. sloop designed and built by Horace Stone in 1910. ADDIE—27 ft. open catboat sloop built in 1902 for Bert Austin at Vancouver Shipyard by William Watt, the first yacht constructed at the yard. Addie was in the original R.V.Y.C. fleet. ADELPIII—44 ft. schooner designed by E. B. Schock for Thicke brothers. Built 1912, sailed by the Thicke brothers till 1919 when sold to Bert Austin, who sold it in 1922 to Seattle. AILSA 1-28.5 ft. D class aux. yawl, Mower design. Built 1907 by Bob Granger, originally named Ta-Meri. Subsequent owners included Ron Maitland, Tom Ramsay, Alan Leckie, Bill Ball and N. S. McDonald. AILSA II—22.5 ft. D class aux. yawl built 1911 by Bob Granger. Owners included J. H. Willard and Joe Wilkinson. ALEXANDRA-45 ft. sloop designed for R.V.Y.C. syndicate by William Fyfe of Fairlie, Scotland and built 1907 by Wm.
  • Fort Hood Noise Study

    Fort Hood Noise Study

    130 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1312 Fort Hood Noise Study RICHARD M. LETTY At the request' of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer , Fort WortJ1 measuring airfield noise and impulsive weapon-firing blast District Office, an in tallation compatible-use zone (ICUZ) noise noise, it was decided that the noise monitoring would be study was prepared for Fort Hood, Texa . The purpose f this performed in two phases. The Phase I noise measurements study was to addres the n i e impact from military training ac­ focused on airfield noise. A total of nine noise measurement tivity conducted at Fort Hood. The major component of this Fort Hood I UZ noise study wa a comprehensive long-term noise locations were selected: two in the vicinity of RGAAF, four monitoring program and the use of computer modeling to develop around HAAF, and three along the various flight corridors noi e contour to iden tify noise-impacted areas. Noise measure­ leading to and from the Fort Hood Army Installation. The ments were obtained at a total of 17 noise measurement locations: Phase II noise measurements focused on the blast noise from 9 airfield noi e monitoring ·itc , and 8 weapon-fi ring blast noise artillery and weapon-firing activity on the various ranges at monitoring site . Because of the day-to-day variations in military Fort Hood. The purpose of the noise monitoring program was training activity, it was determined that 60 days of noise data at ach of the 17 noise-m nitoring sites would be useful in under­ not only to define the actual noise levels from airfield and standing long-term airfield and weapon-firing blast noise levels.
  • Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge

    Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge DDraftraft CComprehensiveomprehensive CConservationonservation PPlanlan aandnd EEnvironmentalnvironmental AAssessmentssessment MMarcharch 20102010 Front and back covers: Northern pintails USFWS This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal Federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fi sh, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service manages the 150-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 550 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 70 national fi sh hatcheries and 81 ecological services fi eld stations. The agency enforces Federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally signifi cant fi sheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fi shing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffi ng increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition.

  • Alaska Post Newspaper

    FREE RECYCLED an edition of the Recycled material is used in the making of our ALASKA POST newsprint The Interior Military News Connection Vol. 8, No. 37 Fort Wainwright, Alaska September 15, 2017 Alaska, California rescue squadrons unite to save lives in Southeast Texas Staff Sgt. Balinda O’Neal Dresel 249th Airlift Squadron bound for Alaska National Guard Public Moffett Federal Airfield, Calif., Affairs to pick up two HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters and aircrews from the Air National Guardsmen from 129th Rescue Squadron. They Alaska’s Chugach Mountains and the arrived in Fort Hood in the early- heart of California’s Silicon Valley morning hours of Aug. 29 and spent last week in the flooded cities of began moving equipment to a Southeast Texas, with one mission— staging area on Gray Army Airfield to save lives. where they were later paired Aircrews, combat rescue officers, with search and rescue personnel pararescuemen and support personnel from California’s 131st Rescue from the Alaska Air National Guard’s Squadron. 176th Wing and members of the “One of the greatest aspects California Air National Guard’s of working with other pararescue 129th Rescue Wing joined more than teams is that we can come together 18,000 National Guard personnel under a common thread and who responded to the call to assist train and work as a joint force,” with Hurricane Harvey humanitarian explained Senior Master Sgt. disaster relief operations. The Airmen Brandon Stuemke, a pararescueman left home Aug. 28 to help their with the 212th Rescue Squadron. neighbors in Texas still needing relief “It allowed for us to seamlessly Air National Guard search and rescue personnel from Alaska and California conduct water and evacuation.
  • Portland Daily Press: July 23,1887

    Portland Daily Press: July 23,1887

    PORTLAND DAILY PRESS. ESTABLISHED JUNE 23, 18G2-VOL. 26. PORTLAND, MAINE, SATURDAY MORNING, JULY 23, 1887._ EmursaiW PRICE THREE CENTS. are of all ter was The oldest Its limit to aid the New Bruns- HII«l€EliLANIiOim. THE PORTLAND DAILY several new mewing machines and other THE CHAUTAUQUAN. theory, for those thing most un- FROM WASHINGTON. there, 59 yerrs. great- FOREIGN. legal already PRESS, X do not Published in those social. By sociability mean a great- granddaughter, 42 years, and the oldest wick railway, has raised nearly $10,000 by every day (Sundays excepted) by the farming utensils, he being a dealer of club er number rooms, church socials, etc., would be It is also PORTLAND PUBLISHING articles. The was all lost and most of in great-great-grandchild (If living) The Thistle private subscription. thought COMPANY, hay A Busy Day at Martha’s Grove thougli these are good their place. It is a The President and the Southern Preparing to Come to At 87 18. Mrs. Small was the mother of nine chil- that more be raised in Monticello Exchange Street, Portland, Me. the machines. The insurance on the Stead- trite saying that it takes all people to make a $5,000 will Cround. Trip. America. Blaine. Terms- Dollars a sub- Camp but we need all kinds for of whom to old by subscription, and $2,000 by The Eight Year. To mall man house was sufficient to cover the world, perfect dren, eight grew age-five scribers, Seven Dollars a In advance. *2400, Those who are Presque Isle Herald says that il Aroostook Year,If paid development.