DOCSLIB.ORG

View of the Choristodera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

“It is the struggle itself that is most important. We must strive to be more than we are. It does not matter that we will not reach our ultimate goal. The effort itself yields its own reward." - Gene Roddenberry University of Alberta The jaw adductor muscles in Champsosaurus and their implications for feeding mechanics by Michael Spencer Brian James A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systematics and Evolution Biological Sciences ©Michael Spencer Brian James Fall 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Examining Committee Philip J. Currie, Biological Sciences Michael W. Caldwell, Biological Sciences Richard C. Fox, Biological Sciences John Acorn, Renewable Resources Abstract The jaw musculature of Champsosaurus has been enigmatic since the taxon was first described. The extant phylogenetic bracketing method is used to determine the morphology of the jaw adductor musculature. Rotational mathematics is used to calculate the muscle forces, torques, angular accelerations, and angular velocities generated by the jaw muscles. The mechanical strength of the skulls of neochoristoderes and crocodilians are investigated using finite element analysis. Finally, the hydrodynamic performance of the skulls of neochoristoderes and crocodilians is studied. The analysis is used to compare neochoristoderes to their extant ecological analogues, crocodilians, and determine the palaeoecological implications of the results. It was found that Champsosaurus rotates the lower jaw faster, the mechanical strength was lower, and shows better hydrodynamic performance than crocodilians. The results suggest that Champsosaurus was ideally suited to prey upon small or juvenile fish, and did not overlap its niche with sympatric crocodilians. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their contributions to the making of this thesis: Dr. Philip Currie for his supervision and guidance, Dr. Michael Caldwell, Dr. Richard Fox, and John Acorn for providing suggestions and feedback on my thesis, Eric Snively and Victoria Arbour for teaching me the basics of biomechanics and assistance in operating the computer programs used in this study, Dr. Don Henderson for devising the computer program used to calculate rotational inertia, Eva Koppelhus for her support over these past few years, Ken Soehn for finding UALVP 47243, the graduate students of the palaeontology lab, Rhian Russell for digitizing the specimen of Crocodylus and her support, and my parents Leanne and Anthony Bowen for the free meals and supporting my interest in palaeontology since childhood. Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Introduction…………………………………………………… 1 CHAPTER 2: Jaw Adductor Muscles of the Neochoristodera………………. 14 CHAPTER 3: Biomechanics of the Jaw Adductor Muscles of Champsosaurus……………………........................................... 52 CHAPTER 4: Finite Element and Hydrodynamic Performance of Neochoristodere and Extant Crocodilian Skulls……………….. 104 CHAPTER 5: Conclusions and Palaeoecological Implications……………… 183 LITERATURE CITED ……………………………………………………… 193 Tables 2.1: Origins of the jaw muscles in neochoristoderes……………………… 45 2.2: Insertions of the jaw muscles in neochoristoderes…………………… 46 3.1: Skull length and width of the neochoristoderes and crocodilians……. 83 3.2: ASCA and adductor chamber forces in neochoristoderes (ST = 24)… 83 3.3: ASCA and adductor chamber forces in neochoristoderes (ST = 30)… 83 3.4: ASCA and adductor chamber forces in crocodilians (ST = 24)……… 84 3.5: ASCA and adductor chamber forces in crocodilians (ST = 30)……… 84 3.6: Jaw muscle forces of UALVP 33928………………………………… 84 3.7: Jaw muscle forces of UALVP 47243………………………………… 85 3.8: Jaw muscle forces of TMP 1984.3.9…………………………………. 85 3.9: Jaw muscle forces of Simoedosaurus dakotensis………………………. 85 3.10: Jaw muscle forces of Alligator mississippiensis………………………. 86 3.11: Jaw muscle forces of Crocodylus cataphractus…………………….. 86 3.12: Jaw muscle forces of Gavialis gangeticus…………………………... 86 3.13: Jaw muscle forces of Tomistoma schlegelii………………………… 87 3.14: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of UAVLP 33928…………….. 87 3.15: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of UAVLP 47243…………….. 87 3.16: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of TMP 1984.3.9……………... 88 3.17: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of Simoedosaurus dakotensis…. 88 3.18: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of Alligator mississippiensis..... 88 3.19: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of Crocodylus cataphractus….. 89 3.20: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of Gavialis gangeticus………... 89 3.21: Tangential force of the jaw muscles of Tomistoma schlegelii……… 89 3.22: Torque of the jaw muscles of UAVLP 33928………………………. 90 3.23: Torque of the jaw muscles of UAVLP 47243………………………. 90 3.24: Torque of the jaw muscles of TMP 1984.3.9……………………….. 90 3.25: Torque of the jaw muscles of Simoedosaurus dakotensis…………... 91 3.26: Torque of the jaw muscles of Alligator mississippiensis…………… 91 3.27: Torque of the jaw muscles of Crocodylus cataphractus……………. 91 3.28: Torque of the jaw muscles of Gavialis gangeticus…………………. 92 3.29: Torque of the jaw muscles of Tomistoma schlegelii………………... 92 3.30: Bite force in all specimens………………………………………….. 93 3.31: Angular acceleration in UALVP 33928…………………………….. 94 3.32: Angular acceleration in UALVP 47243…………………………….. 94 3.33: Angular acceleration in TMP 1984.3.9……………………………... 94 3.34: Angular acceleration in Simoedosaurus dakotensis………………… 95 3.35: Angular acceleration in Alligator mississippiensis…………………. 95 3.36: Angular acceleration in Crocodylus cataphractus………………….. 95 3.37: Angular acceleration in Gavialis gangeticus……………………….. 96 3.38: Angular acceleration in Tomistoma schlegelii……………………… 96 3.39: Tangential acceleration in all specimens……………………………. 97 3.40: Jaw closing time and angular velocity………………………………. 98 3.41: Tangential velocity in all specimens………………………………... 99 4.1: Peak fluid velocity in neochoristodere and crocodilian skull x.s…….. 138 4.2: Fluid pressure in neochoristodere and crocodilian skull x.s………...... 138 4.3: Cell Reynolds number in neochoristodere and crocodilian skull x.s… 138 Figures Figure 2.1: Extant Phylogenetic Brackets of the Choristodera …………... 47 Figure 2.2: Osteology of the skull of Champsosaurus……………………. 48 Figure 2.3: Jaw muscle reconstruction 1 (Sphenodon)……………………. 49 Figure 2.4: Jaw muscle reconstruction 2 (Sphenodon)……………………. 50 Figure 2.5: Jaw muscle reconstruction 3 (crocodilian)……………………. 51 Figure 3.1: ASCA measurements in neochoristoderes……………………. 100 Figure 3.2: ASCA measurements in crocodilians………………………… 101 Figure 3.3: Measurements used in jaw rotation calculations……………… 102 Figure 3.4: Rotational inertia model of UALVP 33928…………………... 103 Figure 4.1: CT scans of UALVP 47243…………………………………... 139 Figure 4.2: Digital model of UALVP 33928……………………………… 140 Figure 4.3: Digital model of Crocodylus cataphractus…………………… 141 Figure 4.4: Stress in UALVP 33928; grasping, orbit……………………... 142 Figure 4.5: Stress in UALVP 33928; grasping, terminus…………............. 143 Figure 4.6: Stress in UALVP 33928; striking, orbit…………..................... 144 Figure 4.7: Stress in UALVP 33928; striking, terminus………….............. 145 Figure 4.8: Stress in UALVP 47243; grasping, terminus…………............. 146 Figure 4.9: Stress in UALVP 47243; striking, terminus………….............. 147 Figure 4.10: Stress in TMP 1984.3.9; grasping, terminus………………… 148 Figure 4.11: Stress in TMP 1984.3.9; striking, terminus…………………. 149 Figure 4.12: Stress in Simoedosaurus dakotensis; grasping, terminus……. 150 Figure 4.13: Stress in Simoedosaurus dakotensis; striking, terminus…….. 151 Figure 4.14: Stress in Alligator mississippiensis; grasping, orbit………… 152 Figure 4.15: Stress in Alligator mississippiensis; grasping, terminus…….. 153 Figure 4.16: Stress in Alligator mississippiensis; striking, orbit………….. 154 Figure 4.17: Stress in Alligator mississippiensis; striking, terminus……… 155 Figure 4.18: Stress in Crocodylus cataphractus; grasping, terminus……... 156 Figure 4.19: Stress in Crocodylus cataphractus; striking, terminus……… 157 Figure 4.20: Stress in Gavialis gangeticus; grasping, terminus…………... 158 Figure 4.21: Stress in Gavialis gangeticus; striking, terminus……………. 159 Figure 4.22: Stress in Tomistoma schlegelii; grasping, terminus…………. 160 Figure 4.23: Stress in Tomistoma schlegelii; striking, terminus…………... 161 Figure 4.24: Fluid velocity in UALVP 33928…………………………….. 162 Figure 4.25: Fluid velocity in UALVP 47243…………………………….. 163 Figure 4.26: Fluid velocity in Simoedosaurus dakotensis………………… 164 Figure 4.27: Fluid velocity in Alligator mississippiensis…………………. 165 Figure 4.28: Fluid velocity in Crocodylus cataphractus………………….. 166 Figure 4.29: Fluid velocity in Gavialis gangeticus……………………….. 167 Figure 4.30: Fluid velocity in Tomistoma schlegelii………………………
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS

    JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS

    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
  • HOVASAURUS BOULEI, an AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN from the UPPER PERMIAN of MADAGASCAR by P.J

    HOVASAURUS BOULEI, an AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN from the UPPER PERMIAN of MADAGASCAR by P.J

    99 Palaeont. afr., 24 (1981) HOVASAURUS BOULEI, AN AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN FROM THE UPPER PERMIAN OF MADAGASCAR by P.J. Currie Provincial Museum ofAlberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T5N OM6, Canada ABSTRACT HovasauTUs is the most specialized of four known genera of tangasaurid eosuchians, and is the most common vertebrate recovered from the Lower Sakamena Formation (Upper Per­ mian, Dzulfia n Standard Stage) of Madagascar. The tail is more than double the snout-vent length, and would have been used as a powerful swimming appendage. Ribs are pachyostotic in large animals. The pectoral girdle is low, but massively developed ventrally. The front limb would have been used for swimming and for direction control when swimming. Copious amounts of pebbles were swallowed for ballast. The hind limbs would have been efficient for terrestrial locomotion at maturity. The presence of long growth series for Ho vasaurus and the more terrestrial tan~saurid ThadeosauTUs presents a unique opportunity to study differences in growth strategies in two closely related Permian genera. At birth, the limbs were relatively much shorter in Ho vasaurus, but because of differences in growth rates, the limbs of Thadeosau­ rus are relatively shorter at maturity. It is suggested that immature specimens of Ho vasauTUs spent most of their time in the water, whereas adults spent more time on land for mating, lay­ ing eggs and/or range dispersal. Specilizations in the vertebrae and carpus indicate close re­ lationship between Youngina and the tangasaurids, but eliminate tangasaurids from consider­ ation as ancestors of other aquatic eosuchians, archosaurs or sauropterygians. CONTENTS Page ABREVIATIONS . ..... ... ......... .......... ... ......... ..... ... ..... .. .... 101 INTRODUCTION .
  • The First Possible Choristoderan Trackway from the Lower

    The First Possible Choristoderan Trackway from the Lower

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The frst possible choristoderan trackway from the Lower Cretaceous Daegu Formation of South Korea and its implications on choristoderan locomotion Yuong‑Nam Lee1*, Dal‑Yong Kong2 & Seung‑Ho Jung2 Here we report a new quadrupedal trackway found in the Lower Cretaceous Daegu Formation (Albian) in the vicinity of Ulsan Metropolitan City, South Korea, in 2018. A total of nine manus‑pes imprints show a strong heteropodous quadrupedal trackway (length ratio is 1:3.36). Both manus and pes tracks are pentadactyl with claw marks. The manus prints rotate distinctly outward while the pes prints are nearly parallel to the direction of travel. The functional axis in manus and pes imprints suggests that the trackmaker moved along the medial side during the stroke progressions (entaxonic), indicating weight support on the inner side of the limbs. There is an indication of webbing between the pedal digits. These new tracks are assigned to Novapes ulsanensis, n. ichnogen., n. ichnosp., which are well‑matched not only with foot skeletons and body size of Monjurosuchus but also the fossil record of choristoderes in East Asia, thereby N. ulsanensis could be made by a monjurosuchid‑like choristoderan and represent the frst possible choristoderan trackway from Asia. N. ulsanensis also suggests that semi‑aquatic choristoderans were capable of walking semi‑erect when moving on the ground with a similar locomotion pattern to that of crocodilians on land. South Korea has become globally famous for various tetrapod footprints from Cretaceous strata1, among which some clades such as frogs2, birds3 and mammals4 have been proved for their existences only with ichnological evidence.
  • Tiago Rodrigues Simões

    Tiago Rodrigues Simões

    Diapsid Phylogeny and the Origin and Early Evolution of Squamates by Tiago Rodrigues Simões A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Tiago Rodrigues Simões, 2018 ABSTRACT Squamate reptiles comprise over 10,000 living species and hundreds of fossil species of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians, with their origins dating back at least as far back as the Middle Jurassic. Despite this enormous diversity and a long evolutionary history, numerous fundamental questions remain to be answered regarding the early evolution and origin of this major clade of tetrapods. Such long-standing issues include identifying the oldest fossil squamate, when exactly did squamates originate, and why morphological and molecular analyses of squamate evolution have strong disagreements on fundamental aspects of the squamate tree of life. Additionally, despite much debate, there is no existing consensus over the composition of the Lepidosauromorpha (the clade that includes squamates and their sister taxon, the Rhynchocephalia), making the squamate origin problem part of a broader and more complex reptile phylogeny issue. In this thesis, I provide a series of taxonomic, phylogenetic, biogeographic and morpho-functional contributions to shed light on these problems. I describe a new taxon that overwhelms previous hypothesis of iguanian biogeography and evolution in Gondwana (Gueragama sulamericana). I re-describe and assess the functional morphology of some of the oldest known articulated lizards in the world (Eichstaettisaurus schroederi and Ardeosaurus digitatellus), providing clues to the ancestry of geckoes, and the early evolution of their scansorial behaviour.
  • The First Crocodyliforms Remains from La Parrita Locality, Cerro Del Pueblo

    The First Crocodyliforms Remains from La Parrita Locality, Cerro Del Pueblo

    Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana / 2019 / 727 The first crocodyliforms remains from La Parrita locality, Cerro del Pueblo Formation (Campanian), Coahuila, Mexico Héctor E. Rivera-Sylva, Gerardo Carbot-Chanona, Rafael Vivas-González, Lizbeth Nava-Rodríguez, Fernando Cabral-Valdéz ABSTRACT Héctor E. Rivera-Sylva ABSTRACT RESUMEN Fernando Cabral-Valdéz Departamento de Paleontología, Museo del Desierto, Carlos Abedrop Dávila 3745, 25022, The record of land tetrapods of El registro de tetrápodos terrestres en la Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. the Cerro del Pueblo Formation Formación Cerro del Pueblo (Cretácico (Late Cretaceous, Campanian), in Gerardo Carbot-Chanona tardío, Campaniano) en Coahuila, incluye Coahuila, includes turtles, pterosaurs, [email protected] tortugas, pterosaurios, dinosaurios y Museo de Paleontología “Eliseo Palacios Aguil- dinosaurs, and crocodyliforms. This era”, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia last group is represented only by crocodyliformes. Este último grupo está Natural. Calzada de los hombres ilustres s/n, representado por goniofólididos, eusuquios 29000, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. goniopholidids, indeterminate eusu- chians, and Brachychampsa montana. In indeterminados y Brachychampsa montana. Rafael Vivas-González this work we report the first crocodyli- En este trabajo se reportan los primeros Villa Nápoles 6506, Colonia Mirador de las Mitras, 64348, Monterrey, N. L., Mexico. form remains from La Parrita locality, restos de crocodyliformes de la localidad Cerro del Pueblo Formation, based La Parrita, Formación Cerro del Pueblo, Lizbeth Nava-Rodríguez on one isolated tooth, vertebrae, and con base en un diente aislado, vértebras y Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autóno- osteoderms. The association of croc- ma de San Luis Potosí, Dr. Manuel Nava 8, osteodermos. La asociación de crocodyli- Zona Universitaria Poniente, San Luis Potosi, odyliforms, turtles, dinosaurs, and formes, tortugas, dinosaurios y oogonias S.L.P., Mexico.

  • Reptile Family Tree - Peters 2017 1112 Taxa, 231 Characters

    Reptile Family Tree - Peters 2017 1112 taxa, 231 characters Note: This tree does not support DNA topologies over 100 Eldeceeon 1990.7.1 67 Eldeceeon holotype long phylogenetic distances. 100 91 Romeriscus Diplovertebron Certain dental traits are convergent and do not define clades. 85 67 Solenodonsaurus 100 Chroniosaurus 94 Chroniosaurus PIN3585/124 Chroniosuchus 58 94 Westlothiana Casineria 84 Brouffia 93 77 Coelostegus Cheirolepis Paleothyris Eusthenopteron 91 Hylonomus Gogonasus 78 66 Anthracodromeus 99 Osteolepis 91 Protorothyris MCZ1532 85 Protorothyris CM 8617 81 Pholidogaster Protorothyris MCZ 2149 97 Colosteus 87 80 Vaughnictis Elliotsmithia Apsisaurus Panderichthys 51 Tiktaalik 86 Aerosaurus Varanops Greererpeton 67 90 94 Varanodon 76 97 Koilops <50 Spathicephalus Varanosaurus FMNH PR 1760 Trimerorhachis 62 84 Varanosaurus BSPHM 1901 XV20 Archaeothyris 91 Dvinosaurus 89 Ophiacodon 91 Acroplous 67 <50 82 99 Batrachosuchus Haptodus 93 Gerrothorax 97 82 Secodontosaurus Neldasaurus 85 76 100 Dimetrodon 84 95 Trematosaurus 97 Sphenacodon 78 Metoposaurus Ianthodon 55 Rhineceps 85 Edaphosaurus 85 96 99 Parotosuchus 80 82 Ianthasaurus 91 Wantzosaurus Glaucosaurus Trematosaurus long rostrum Cutleria 99 Pederpes Stenocybus 95 Whatcheeria 62 94 Ossinodus IVPP V18117 Crassigyrinus 87 62 71 Kenyasaurus 100 Acanthostega 94 52 Deltaherpeton 82 Galechirus 90 MGUH-VP-8160 63 Ventastega 52 Suminia 100 Baphetes Venjukovia 65 97 83 Ichthyostega Megalocephalus Eodicynodon 80 94 60 Proterogyrinus 99 Sclerocephalus smns90055 100 Dicynodon 74 Eoherpeton
  • Terra Nostra 2018, 1; Mte13

    Terra Nostra 2018, 1; Mte13

    IMPRINT TERRA NOSTRA – Schriften der GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Publisher Verlag GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung c/o Universität Potsdam, Institut für Erd- und Umweltwissenschaften Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Haus 27, 14476 Potsdam, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)331-977-5789, Fax: +49 (0)331-977-5700 E-Mail: [email protected] Editorial office Dr. Christof Ellger Schriftleitung GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung c/o Universität Potsdam, Institut für Erd- und Umweltwissenschaften Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Haus 27, 14476 Potsdam, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)331-977-5789, Fax: +49 (0)331-977-5700 E-Mail: [email protected] Vol. 2018/1 13th Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota (MTE13) Heft 2018/1 Abstracts Editors Thomas Martin, Rico Schellhorn & Julia A. Schultz Herausgeber Steinmann-Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany Editorial staff Rico Schellhorn & Julia A. Schultz Redaktion Steinmann-Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany Printed by www.viaprinto.de Druck Copyright and responsibility for the scientific content of the contributions lie with the authors. Copyright und Verantwortung für den wissenschaftlichen Inhalt der Beiträge liegen bei den Autoren. ISSN 0946-8978 GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung – Potsdam, Juni 2018 MTE13 13th Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn,
  • The Palaeontology Newsletter

    The Palaeontology Newsletter

    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents 70 Association Business 2 Association Meetings 10 Progressive Palaeontology 12 From our correspondents Of trousers, time and cheese 14 PalaeoMath 101: Who is Procrustes? 21 Meeting Reports III Latin-American Congress 37 52nd Annual Meeting of PalAss 44 13th Echinoderm Conference 51 Symposium on Cretaceous System 59 Mystery Fossils 16 (and 14) 60 Future meetings of other bodies 62 Reporter: Ammonoid hunting in the snow 71 Sylvester-Bradley Report 75 Graduate opportunities in Palaeontology 80 Alumnus orientalis: graduate study in Japan 85 Book Reviews 92 Palaeontology vol 52 parts 1 & 2 99–102 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no 71 is 15th June 2009. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 70 2 Association Business Annual Meeting Notification is given of the 54th Annual General Meeting and Annual Address This will be held at the University of Birmingham on 14th December 2009, at the end of the first day of scientific sessions in the 53rd Annual Meeting. There are further details in the following section, ‘Association Meetings’. Lapworth Medal: Prof. Charles Holland Charles Holland has been at the forefront of research on the palaeontology and stratigraphy of the Lower Palaeozoic in a career extending over 50 years. His research interests are wide and include the stratigraphy of the Silurian, particularly of Ireland and Britain; Silurian faunas, particularly nautiloids and graptolites; the geology of Ireland; the methodology of stratigraphy; and the concept of geological time. A sketch of his contribution may be viewed in the accompanying ten publications, chosen from a list of over 150 scientific articles and three books, a list that would have been longer had he appeared as co-author of papers arising from the postgraduate research of the many students that he supervised.
  • The Lepidosaurian Reptile Champsosaurus in North America

    The Lepidosaurian Reptile Champsosaurus in North America

    Photograph bJ, fames Wagoner. LIFE RESTORATION OF CHAMPSOSAURUS HUNTING. Painting by J erome Connolly in The Science Museum of Minnesota. THE LEPIDOSAURIAN REPTILE CHAMPSOSAURUS IN NORTH AMERICA BRUCE R. ERICKSON CURATOR OF PALEONTOLOGY MONOGRAPH VOLUME 1: PALEONTOLOGY Published by THE SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA ST. PAUL: March 31, 1972 MONOGRAPH OF THE SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA VOLUME 1 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 77-186470 Standard Boole Number 911338-78-0 CONTENTS Page Illustrations ......................................... 2 Introduction ................................................. 5 Species of Champsosaurus . 7 Skull of Cha;rnpsosauru.s gigas, New Species. 12 Postcranial Skeleton of Champsosaurus gigas, New Species ... 26 General Morphology . 52 Skull ................................................... 52 Postcranial Skeleton . 53 Some Aspects of Functional Morphology . 72 Responsive Functions . 75 Correlations and Distribution. 82 Phylogeny . 86 Summary ................................................... 89 Bibliography . 90 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES Page 1. Correlation Chart of Champsosaurs. 9 2. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, dorsal view, PU 16239. 13 3. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, ventral view, PU 16239. 14 4. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, dorsal view, PU 16240. 15 5. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, ventral view, PU 16240. 16 6. Restoration of skull, C hampsosaurus gig as, dorsal view. 19 7. Restoration of skull, Champsosaurus gigas, ventral view. 22 8. Occipital region of skull, Cha.mpsosaurus gigas. 23 9. Lateral view of mandible, Champsosaurus gigas. 25 10. Cervical vertebrae, Champsosa.urus gigas. 27 11. Pleurocentrum of atlas, Champsosaurus gigas. 28 12. Hypocentrum of atlas, Champsosaurus gigas. 28 13. Posterior cervical centrum, Champsosaurus gigas. 29 14. Intercentrum of cervical vertebra, Chmnpsosaurus gigas. 29 15. Dorsal vertebra, Champsosaurus gigas. 30 16. Sacrum, lateral view, Champsosaurus gigas.
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of a New Morphological Dataset Elucidates the Evolutionary History of Crocodylia and Resolves the Long-Standing Gharial Problem

    Phylogenetic Analysis of a New Morphological Dataset Elucidates the Evolutionary History of Crocodylia and Resolves the Long-Standing Gharial Problem

    Phylogenetic analysis of a new morphological dataset elucidates the evolutionary history of Crocodylia and resolves the long-standing gharial problem Jonathan P. Rio1 and Philip D. Mannion2* 1Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK 2Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK *Corresponding author (email address: [email protected]) ABSTRACT First appearing in the latest Cretaceous, Crocodylia is a clade of mostly semi-aquatic, predatory reptiles, defined by the last common ancestor of extant alligators, caimans, crocodiles, and gharials. Despite large strides in resolving extant and fossil crocodylian interrelationships over the last three decades, several outstanding problems persist in crocodylian systematics. Most notably, there has been persistent discordance between morphological and molecular datasets surrounding the affinities of the extant gharials, Gavialis gangeticus and Tomistoma schlegelii. Whereas molecular data consistently support a sister relationship between the extant gharials, which appear to be more closely related to crocodylids than to alligatorids, morphological data indicate that Gavialis is the sister taxon to all other extant crocodylians. Here we present a new morphological dataset for Crocodylia, based on a critical reappraisal of published crocodylian character data matrices and extensive first-hand observations of a global sample of crocodylians. This comprises the most taxonomically comprehensive crocodylian dataset to date (144 OTUs scored for 330 characters) and includes a new, illustrated character list with modifications to the construction and scoring of characters, and 46 novel characters. Under a maximum parsimony framework, our analyses robustly recover Gavialis as more closely related to Tomistoma than to other extant crocodylians for the first time based on morphology alone.
  • Diapsida: Choristodera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Liaoning, China

    Diapsida: Choristodera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Liaoning, China

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5339479 Osteology and taxonomic revision of Hyphalosaurus (Diapsida: Choristodera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Liaoning, China Article in Journal of Anatomy · July 2008 Impact Factor: 2.1 · DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00907.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 14 20 2 authors, including: Ke-Qin Gao Peking University 63 PUBLICATIONS 1,710 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Ke-Qin Gao letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 13 June 2016 J. Anat. (2008) 212, pp747–768 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00907.x OsteologyBlackwell Publishing Ltd and taxonomic revision of Hyphalosaurus (Diapsida: Choristodera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Liaoning, China Ke-Qin Gao1,2 and Daniel T. Ksepka2 1School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China 2Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA Abstract Although the long-necked choristodere Hyphalosaurus is the most abundant tetrapod fossil in the renowned Yixian Formation fossil beds of Liaoning Province, China, the genus has only been briefly described from largely unprepared specimens. This paper provides a thorough osteological description of the type species Hyphalosaurus lingyuanensis and the con-generic species Hyphalosaurus baitaigouensis based on the study of fossils from several research institutions in China. The diagnoses for these two species are revised based on comparison of a large sample of specimens from the type area and horizon of each of the two species.
  • Samuel Wendell Williston

    Samuel Wendell Williston

    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES S A M U E L W ENDELL WILLISTON 1852—1918 A Biographical Memoir by R I C H A R D SW A N N L U L L Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1919 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. SAMUEL WENDELL WILLISTON. 1852-1918. By RICHARD SWANN LULL. PART I.—BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. In his immediate family, Prof. Williston stood as a conspicuous figure, as a scholar, a man of research, and one who by an innate superiority made himself what he was. For he owed little to his forebears other than the heritage of those sterling qualities which have made New Englanders in general so vital a force in the evolution of our national character and prestige; his scientific tendencies were an individual characteristic, and he stands as the only recorded Williston to follow lines of scientific research. Williston's father, Samuel Williston, was a blacksmith, and, although a man of considerable native ability, was totally untrained in the affairs of book men. He possessed, however, that pioneer spirit which impelled so many eastern men to migrate to the developing West and seek in a new environment the elusive fortune which the East did not provide. Hence, while Will- iston was born in Boston, his development, in so far as environment exerted a control, was due almost exclusively to the stimulating conditions of the newly invaded West. Here he spent his boyhood.