View of Field Site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin, Wyoming 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View of Field Site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin, Wyoming 4 UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ Taxonomic Diversity, Faunal Analysis and Paleoecology of a microvertebrate site in the Late Cretaceous Meeteetse Formation, Northern Wyoming A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Geology Of the College of Arts and Sciences 2005 by Ji-Yeon Shin B.S., Ewha Women’s University, 2002 Committee Chair: Dr. Glenn W. Storrs ABSTRACT A microvertebrate study of a fossil locality in the Late Cretaceous Meeteetse Formation, northern Wyoming, has resulted in the discovery of more than one thousand specimens and at least fifteen vertebrate taxa. The Meeteetse vertebrate fauna is highly aquatic. Dominance of fresh water fish, such as Myledaphus and Lepisosteus, soft-shelled turtles and crocodiles is indicative. A small theropod tooth belongs to Saurornitholestes. Hadrosaurs and ceratopsians are present. A rare multituberculate molar and an incisor were also recovered and referred to Mesodma. Analysis of sedimentology and ecology of the vertebrates and invertebrates indicate that the Elk Basin site in the Meeteetse Formation was deposited in a broad flood plain associated with ponds and small lakes in humid climate conditions in the early Maastrichtian. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was carried out under the guidance of my committee chair, Dr. Glenn W. Storrs, to whom I am especially grateful for suggesting this study, valuable advice, deep interest and support of the project. I would like to thank my other committee members, Dr. Carlton E. Brett and Dr. David L. Meyer for contributing many critical suggestions and valuable discussion. Dr. Carlton E. Brett especially gave constant encouragement, for which I am very grateful. I would like to thank Dr. Warren Huff for giving valuable comments on dating and generously helping me with photographing small specimens using his facility. I am also grateful to Dr. David L. Meyer for helping with initial photography. Mason Jane Milam gave help and advice on photography at Cincinnati Museum Center. I am especially grateful for Bill Garcia and Dale Gnidovec who spent so many hours to help collect samples and screen in the hot weather. Their help was indispensable. I am also thankful to volunteers at Cincinnati Museum Center who helped me with detailed screening. I would like to thank Dr. Donald B. Brinkman for providing a detailed illustrated guide to identify microvertebrate specimens, for which I am most grateful. iii I must thank Ana Londono for helping with screening and sorting at Cincinnati Museum Center and for constant support in the office. She has been a source of knowledge and advice in geology, and provided constant friendship throughout this study. Finally, special thanks to my family at home for their endless support, for cheering me up in the low times and encouraging me to pursue my dreams. Financial support for this research was provided by Cincinnati Museum Center and the University of Cincinnati Department of Geology. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………...…………………………….ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...…………...………...……….…...…...……………….……….. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………….v LIST OF FIGURES ...………………………………………………………...………………vii LIST OF TABLES ..........................................................................................................ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………...……. 1 BACKGROUND …………………………………………………………………….…...…... 7 General stratigraphy and sedimentology…………………………………...……. 7 Depositional history during the Late Cretaceous in Wyoming...…………...…. 13 Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the field site in Elk Basin ......................... 15 METHODS ………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 CHAPTER 2 FAUNAL LIST OF VERTEBRATES.............................................................................. 25 SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY …………………………………………………...…..... 28 INVERTEBRATE FAUNA ........................................................................................... 56 ANALYSIS OF MEETEETSE VERTEBRATE FAUNA ……………………………….... 57 PALEOECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ……………………………………………………...... 60 Paleoenvironment of the Meeteetse Formation based on sedimentology .........61 Paleoecology of the Meeteetse Formation based on vertebrates ………….…..61 v CONCLUSIONS …………………………………………………………………….……... 65 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………….………. 67 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page No. 1. Map of Wyoming showing location of the field site at Elk Basin and adjacent basins 2 2. Geographic location of field site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin, Wyoming 3 3. Overview of field site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin, Wyoming 4 4. Latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) paleogeographic map of western North America 8 5. Stratigraphic position of exposures in Big Horn Basin and adjacent regions in Wyoming 10 6. General stratigraphy of the Elk Basin section 11 7. Overview of the field site at Elk Bain 16 8. Closer view of the field site 17 9. Stratigraphic position of the Meeteetse Formation at field site at Elk Basin 18 10. A thirty cm deep trench at field site for describing micro-stratigraphic section 19 11. Columnar section of the field site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin 21 12. Buckets used to collect sediments from field 23 13. Wood screens before matrix distribution 23 14. Screens in water before processing 24 15. Wet screening device at Cincinnati Museum Center 24 vii 16. Lonchidion selachos 29 17. Myledaphus bipartitus 31 18. A dentition of extant Raja sp. 32 19. Acipenser sp. 33 20. Kindleia fragosa 36 21. Lepisosteus sp. 38 22. Teleost 40 23. Plesiobaena sp. 43 24. Basilemys sp. 44 25. Adocus sp. 44 26. Aspideretes sp. 45 27. Borealosuchus sp. 47 28. Saurornitholestes langstoni 49 29. Hadrosaur 50 30. Ceratopsian 52 31. Ornithischian ossified tendons 53 32. Mesodma sp. 54 33. Relative abundance of vertebrates based on groups 58 viii LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO. PAGE NO. 1. Micro-stratigraphic description of the Meeteetse Formation at field site 20 2. Relative abundance of Meeteetse Fauna 57 3. Relative abundance of vertebrates based on groups 58 4. Environmental preferences of selachian taxa in the Meeteetse Formation 62 ix Introduction Vertebrate microfossil studies provide an important source of paleoecological information. Microvertebrate localities are those where small skeletal remains, such as small bones and teeth of various vertebrates, have become concentrated. Materials can be obtained through surface collecting and wet screening. Earlier microvertebrate studies of the Late Cretaceous showed that paleoenvironmental interpretations can be made based on faunal and sedimentological analyses. These studies have provided an understanding of the changes in paleocommunity structure during the Late Cretaceous (Estes, 1964; Estes and Berberian, 1970; Sahni, 1972; Dodson, 1983; Lehman, 1987; Brinkman, 1990). In this study, non-marine vertebrate microfossils from the Late Cretaceous Meeteetse Formation were analyzed and paleoecology was assessed based on taxonomic diversity and sedimentology. The Meeteetse Formation was first described by Hewett (1914) from exposures near the town of Meeteetse in the southwestern part of the Big Horn Basin (Fig. 1) in south-central Montana and northern Wyoming. The Meeteetse Formation is a predominantly terrestrial unit, ranging from Campanian to early Maastrichtian in age. The field site is located near an oil well pad at Elk Basin, northeast of Powell, Wyoming (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Exact field site details are on file at Cincinnati Museum Center (CMC). 1 Figure 1: Map of Wyoming showing location of the field site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin and adjacent basins. Modified from Hicks (1993) 2 Figure 2: Geographic location of field site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin, Wyoming 3 Figure 3: Overview of field site of the Meeteetse Formation at Elk Basin, Wyoming, scale in meter. 4 The Meeteetse Formation has yielded relatively few vertebrate fossils until now. The discovery of a new microvertebrate site in Elk Basin, Wyoming has given the Meeteetse Formation new potential. Preliminary finds include isolated dinosaur teeth and bone fragments (Ornithischia and Theropoda), portions of turtle shells, gar scales (Lepisosteus) and freshwater skate teeth (Myledaphus) (Hicks, 1993). In addition, the Elk Basin locality appears highly fossiliferous, and holds the potential for further discovery of rare squamates and mammalian taxa, as indicated by the discovery of multituberculate teeth during this study. This project examined the taxonomic diversity and paleoecology of the Elk Basin locality. A detailed collection of microvertebrates from the new locality recovered over one thousand of specimens. A complete faunal analysis of bulk samples, including species identification and relative abundances, was conducted. The paleoenvironmental condition of the site was assessed on the basis of the fauna, taphonomy of the samples, sedimentology, and regional stratigraphy. Estes, (1964) classic work on the Lance Formation (late Maastrichtian) resulted in the
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • APS Bulletin 28(1) March 2013
    Palæontological Society Bulletin AlbertaVOLUME 28 • NUMBER 1 www.albertapaleo.org MARCH 2013 ALBERTA PALÆONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS MEMBERSHIP: Any person with a sincere interest in President Wayne Braunberger (403) 278-5154 palaeontology is eligible to present their application for Vice-President Cory Gross (403) 617-2079 membership in the Society. (Please enclose membership Treasurer Mona Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 dues with your request for application.) Secretary Arnold Ingelson (403) 249-6748 Past-President Dan Quinsey (403) 247-3022 Single membership $20.00 annually Family or Institution $25.00 annually DIRECTORS Editor Howard Allen (403) 274-1858 THE BULLETIN WILL BE PUBLISHED QUARTERLY: Membership Vaclav Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 March, June, September and December. Deadline for sub- Programs Harold Whittaker (403) 286-0349 mitting material for publication is the 15th of the month Field Trips (To volunteer contact the President) prior to publication. COMMITTEES Society Mailing Address: Fossil Collection Howard Allen (403) 274-1858 Alberta Palaeontological Society Library Reg Spratley (403) 263-0556 P.O. Box 35111, Sarcee Postal Outlet Public Outreach Cory Gross (403) 617-2079 Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3E 7C7 Social Dan Quinsey (403) 247-3022 (Web: www.albertapaleo.org) Symposium Vaclav Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 Website Vaclav Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 Material for the Bulletin: The Society was incorporated in 1986, as a non-profit Howard Allen, Editor, APS organization formed to: 7828 Hunterslea Crescent, N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2K 4M2 a. Promote the science of palaeontology through study (E-mail: [email protected]) and education. b. Make contributions to the science by: NOTICE: Readers are advised that opinions expressed in 1) Discovery 2) Collection 3) Description the articles are those of the author and do not necessarily 4) Education of the general public reflect the viewpoint of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Crocodile Specialist Group Newsletter 27(3): 6-8
    CROCODILE SPECIALIST GROUP NEWSLETTER VOLUME 31 No. 1 • JANUARY 2012 - MARCH 2012 IUCN • Species Survival Commission CSG Newsletter Subscription The CSG Newsletter is produced and distributed by the Crocodile CROCODILE Specialist Group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). The CSG Newsletter provides information on the conservation, status, news and current events concerning crocodilians, and on the SPECIALIST activities of the CSG. The Newsletter is distributed to CSG members and to other interested individuals and organizations. All Newsletter recipients are asked to contribute news and other materials. The CSG Newsletter is available as: • Hard copy (by subscription - see below); and/or, • Free electronic, downloadable copy from “http://iucncsg.org/ GROUP ph1/modules/Publications/newsletter.html”. Annual subscriptions for hard copies of the CSG Newsletter may be made by cash ($US55), credit card ($AUD55) or bank transfer ($AUD55). Cheques ($USD) will be accepted, however due to increased bank charges associated with this method of payment, cheques are no longer recommended. A Subscription Form can be NEWSLETTER downloaded from “http://iucncsg.org/ph1/modules/Publications/ newsletter.html”. All CSG communications should be addressed to: CSG Executive Office, P.O. Box 530, Karama, NT 0813, Australia. VOLUME 31 Number 1 Fax: (61) 8 89470678. E-mail: [email protected]. JANUARY 2012 - MARCH 2012 PATRONS IUCN - Species Survival Commission We thank all patrons who have donated to the CSG and its conservation program over many years, and especially to CHAIRMAN: donors in 2010-2011 (listed below). Professor Grahame Webb PO Box 530, Karama, NT 0813, Australia Big Bull Crocs! ($15,000 or more annually or in aggregate donations) Japan, JLIA - Japan Leather & Leather Goods Industries EDITORIAL AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE: Association, CITES Promotion Committee & All Japan PO Box 530, Karama, NT 0813, Australia Reptile Skin and Leather Association, Tokyo, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Coprolites of Deinosuchus and Other Crocodylians from the Upper Cretaceous of Western Georgia, Usa
    Milàn, J., Lucas, S.G., Lockley, M.G. and Spielmann, J.A., eds., 2010, Crocodyle tracks and traces. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 51. 209 COPROLITES OF DEINOSUCHUS AND OTHER CROCODYLIANS FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF WESTERN GEORGIA, USA SAMANTHA D. HARRELL AND DAVID R. SCHWIMMER Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA 31907 USA, [email protected] Abstract—Associated with abundant bones, teeth and osteoderms of the giant eusuchian Deinosuchus rugosus are larger concretionary masses of consistent form and composition. It is proposed that these are crocodylian coprolites, and further, based on their size and abundance, that these are coprolites of Deinosuchus. The associated coprolite assemblage also contains additional types that may come from smaller crocodylians, most likely species of the riverine/estuarine genus Borealosuchus, which is represented by bones, osteoderms and teeth in fossil collections from the same site. INTRODUCTION The Upper Cretaceous Blufftown Formation in western Georgia contains a diverse perimarine and marine vertebrate fauna, including many sharks and bony fish (Case and Schwimmer, 1988), mosasaurs, plesio- saurs, turtles (Schwimmer, 1986), dinosaurs (Schwimmer et al., 1993), and of particular interest here, abundant remains of the giant eusuchian crocodylian Deinosuchus rugosus (Schwimmer and Williams, 1996; Schwimmer, 2002). Together with bite traces attributable to Deinosuchus (see Schwimmer, this volume), there are more than 60 coprolites recov- ered from the same formation, including ~30 specimens that appear to be of crocodylian origin. It is proposed here that the larger coprolites are from Deinosuchus, principally because that is the most common large tetrapod in the vertebrate bone assemblage from the same locality, and it is assumed that feces scale to the producer (Chin, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Gar (Lepisosteidae)
    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Gar (Lepisosteidae) Gar species found in Indiana waters: -Longnose Gar (Lepisosteus osseus) -Shortnose Gar (Lepisosteus platostomus) -Spotted Gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) -Alligator Gar* (Atractosteus spatula) *Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Alligator gar were extirpated in many states due to habitat destruction, but now they have been reintroduced to their old native habitat in the states of Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Because they have been stocked into the Ohio River, there is a possibility that alligator gar are either already in Indiana or will be found here in the future. Alligator gar are one of the largest freshwater fishes of North America and can reach up to 10 feet long and weigh 300 pounds. Alligator gar are passive, solitary fishes that live in large rivers, swamps, bayous, and lakes. They have a short, wide snout and a double row of teeth on the upper jaw. They are ambush predators that eat mainly fish but have also been seen to eat waterfowl. They are not, however, harmful to humans, as they will only attack an animal that they can swallow whole. Photo Credit: Duane Raver, USFWS Other Names -garpike, billy gar -Shortnose gar: shortbill gar, stubnose gar -Longnose gar: needlenose gar, billfish Why are they called gar? The Anglo-Saxon word gar means spear, which describes the fishes’ long spear-like appearance. The genus name Lepisosteus contains the Greek words lepis which means “scale” and osteon which means “bone.” What do they look like? Gar are slender, cylindrical fishes with hard, diamond-shaped and non-overlapping scales.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Crocodyliforms Remains from La Parrita Locality, Cerro Del Pueblo
    Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana / 2019 / 727 The first crocodyliforms remains from La Parrita locality, Cerro del Pueblo Formation (Campanian), Coahuila, Mexico Héctor E. Rivera-Sylva, Gerardo Carbot-Chanona, Rafael Vivas-González, Lizbeth Nava-Rodríguez, Fernando Cabral-Valdéz ABSTRACT Héctor E. Rivera-Sylva ABSTRACT RESUMEN Fernando Cabral-Valdéz Departamento de Paleontología, Museo del Desierto, Carlos Abedrop Dávila 3745, 25022, The record of land tetrapods of El registro de tetrápodos terrestres en la Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. the Cerro del Pueblo Formation Formación Cerro del Pueblo (Cretácico (Late Cretaceous, Campanian), in Gerardo Carbot-Chanona tardío, Campaniano) en Coahuila, incluye Coahuila, includes turtles, pterosaurs, [email protected] tortugas, pterosaurios, dinosaurios y Museo de Paleontología “Eliseo Palacios Aguil- dinosaurs, and crocodyliforms. This era”, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia last group is represented only by crocodyliformes. Este último grupo está Natural. Calzada de los hombres ilustres s/n, representado por goniofólididos, eusuquios 29000, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. goniopholidids, indeterminate eusu- chians, and Brachychampsa montana. In indeterminados y Brachychampsa montana. Rafael Vivas-González this work we report the first crocodyli- En este trabajo se reportan los primeros Villa Nápoles 6506, Colonia Mirador de las Mitras, 64348, Monterrey, N. L., Mexico. form remains from La Parrita locality, restos de crocodyliformes de la localidad Cerro del Pueblo Formation, based La Parrita, Formación Cerro del Pueblo, Lizbeth Nava-Rodríguez on one isolated tooth, vertebrae, and con base en un diente aislado, vértebras y Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autóno- osteoderms. The association of croc- ma de San Luis Potosí, Dr. Manuel Nava 8, osteodermos. La asociación de crocodyli- Zona Universitaria Poniente, San Luis Potosi, odyliforms, turtles, dinosaurs, and formes, tortugas, dinosaurios y oogonias S.L.P., Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21St Century
    Copeia 103, No. 4, 2015, 858–873 When Tradition Meets Technology: Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21st Century Eric J. Hilton1, Nalani K. Schnell2, and Peter Konstantinidis1 Many of the primary groups of fishes currently recognized have been established through an iterative process of anatomical study and comparison of fishes that has spanned a time period approaching 500 years. In this paper we give a brief history of the systematic morphology of fishes, focusing on some of the individuals and their works from which we derive our own inspiration. We further discuss what is possible at this point in history in the anatomical study of fishes and speculate on the future of morphology used in the systematics of fishes. Beyond the collection of facts about the anatomy of fishes, morphology remains extremely relevant in the age of molecular data for at least three broad reasons: 1) new techniques for the preparation of specimens allow new data sources to be broadly compared; 2) past morphological analyses, as well as new ideas about interrelationships of fishes (based on both morphological and molecular data) provide rich sources of hypotheses to test with new morphological investigations; and 3) the use of morphological data is not limited to understanding phylogeny and evolution of fishes, but rather is of broad utility to understanding the general biology (including phenotypic adaptation, evolution, ecology, and conservation biology) of fishes. Although in some ways morphology struggles to compete with the lure of molecular data for systematic research, we see the anatomical study of fishes entering into a new and exciting phase of its history because of recent technological and methodological innovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans-Peter Schultze, a Great Paleoichthyologist for Whom Work Is Synonymous with Enjoyment
    Mitt. Mus. Nat.kd. Berl., Geowiss. Reihe 5 (2002) 5-17 10.11.2002 Hans-Peter Schultze, a great paleoichthyologist for whom work is synonymous with enjoyment Richard Cloutierl With 4 figures and 2 tables In the summer of 1982, Hans-Peter Schultze and above all by his simplicity and friendliness. Two Gloria Arratia were invited to a small museum years later I started my PbD. at The University located on a fossiliferous site of the Devonian of Kansas, under the supervision of Hans-Peter. Escuminac Formation in Miguasha, Quebec, Compared to his long career, these two weeks eastern Canada. Hans-Peter was to work with that Hans-Peter spent in Miguasha represent an Marius Arsenault, the director of the Miguasha extremely short period of time. Some might say Museum, on the skull of the elpistostegalid EZ- that this little anecdote is insignificant when in- pistostege watsoni, a species closely related to ba- troducing a vertebrate paleontologist (Fig. ZA) sal tetrapods. In addition, he went through the who published 132 papers and books (a total of collections to describe and measure numerous 2977 published pages) in addition to more than juvenile specimens of the osteolepiform Eusthe- 80 abstracts, book reviews and obituaries. How- nopteron foordi. As expected, these two projects ever, this brief story is representative of Hans- turned out to be important contributions in low- Peter’s personality and contributions. He is a er vertebrate paleontology and systematics: one great scientist with numerous interests in science, on the origin of tetrapods (1985), and the second art, and history. Hans-Peter enjoys digging for one on growth patterns of a Late Devonian fish fossils, looking at fossils and describing fossils, (1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Taphonomy: a Statistical and Phylogenetic
    Drumheller and Brochu | 1 1 PHYLOGENETIC TAPHONOMY: A STATISTICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC 2 APPROACH FOR EXPLORING TAPHONOMIC PATTERNS IN THE FOSSIL 3 RECORD USING CROCODYLIANS 4 STEPHANIE K. DRUMHELLER1, CHRISTOPHER A. BROCHU2 5 1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 6 Tennessee, 37996, U.S.A. 7 2. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 8 52242, U.S.A. 9 email: [email protected] 10 RRH: CROCODYLIAN BITE MARKS IN PHYLOGENETIC CONTEXT 11 LRH: DRUMHELLER AND BROCHU Drumheller and Brochu | 2 12 ABSTRACT 13 Actualistic observations form the basis of many taphonomic studies in paleontology. 14However, surveys limited by environment or taxon may not be applicable far beyond the bounds 15of the initial observations. Even when multiple studies exploring the potential variety within a 16taphonomic process exist, quantitative methods for comparing these datasets in order to identify 17larger scale patterns have been understudied. This research uses modern bite marks collected 18from 21 of the 23 generally recognized species of extant Crocodylia to explore statistical and 19phylogenetic methods of synthesizing taphonomic datasets. Bite marks were identified, and 20specimens were then coded for presence or absence of different mark morphotypes. Attempts to 21find statistical correlation between trace types, marking animal vital statistics, and sample 22collection protocol were unsuccessful. Mapping bite mark character states on a eusuchian 23phylogeny successfully predicted the presence of known diagnostic, bisected marks in extinct 24taxa. Predictions for clades that may have created multiple subscores, striated marks, and 25extensive crushing were also generated. Inclusion of fossil bite marks which have been positively 26associated with extinct species allow this method to be projected beyond the crown group.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Lepisosteidae (Gars)
    Invasive Species Fact Sheet Gar, Family Lepisosteidae General Description Gars are large, freshwater fish belonging to the Lepisosteidae family, which consists of 7 species of gar: alligator, Cuban, Florida, longnose, shortnose, spotted, and tropical. Gars have long, cylindrical bodies covered in hard, shiny, diamond-shaped Alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) scales. Their dorsal and anal fins sit far back on the body, Photo by South Carolina Department of Natural Resources near the tail. They have slender snouts with sharp, needle- like teeth. Gars are generally green to brown in color on their top and sides and white to yellow on their bellies; some species have spots on their bodies and/or fins. The different species of gar can be distinguished by snout length, number of rows of teeth, and the amount and location of spots. Depending on the species, adult gar range from 1 to over 9 feet long. The largest species of gar, the alligator gar, has been reported to grow up to 10 feet and weigh 350 lbs. Current Distribution Gars are not currently found in California. Alligator gars have been collected in California waters on a few occasions, but these fish were likely the result of aquarium releases. Five of the seven gar species are native to the United States. Spotted gars (Lepisosteus oculatus) confiscated Gars are currently found within and outside of their native ranges in by CDFW wardens the United States from the Great Lakes basin in the north, south Photo by CDFW through the Mississippi River drainage to Texas, Mexico, and Florida. Florida gars are only found in Florida and Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogene: Paleocene) Of
    Cainozoic Research, 8(1-2), pp. 13-28, December2011 Chondrichthyans from the Clayton Limestone Unit of the Midway Group (Paleogene: Paleocene) of Hot Spring County, Arkansas, USA ¹, ² Martin+A. Becker Lauren+C. Smith¹ & John+A. Chamberlain+Jr. 1 Department ofEnvironmentalScience, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey 07470; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department ofGeology, Brooklyn College andDoctoralProgram in Earth and EnvironmentalSciences, City University ofNew YorkGraduate Center, New York 10016; email:[email protected] Received 7 September 2010; revised version accepted 26 June 2011 LimestoneUnit of The Clayton the Midway Group (Paleocene) in southwestern Arkansas preserves one ofthe oldest chondrichthyan Cenozoic from the Gulf Coastal Plainofthe United assemblages yet reported States. Present are at least eight taxa, including; Odontaspis winkleriLeriche, Carcharias cf. whitei Carcharias Anomotodon 1905; (Arambourg, 1952); sp.; novus (Winkler, 1874); Cretalamnasp.; Otodus obliquus Agassiz, 1843; Hypolophodon sylvestris (White, 1931); Myliobatis dixoni Agassiz, 1843; and a chimaeridofindeterminate affiliation.Also present are lamnoid-type and carcharhinoid-type chondrichthyan vertebral centra. The Clayton chondrichthyan assem- blage derives from an outcrop locatedonly a few kilometersfrom a site exposing an assemblage ofMaastrichtianchondrichthyans from Because and the upper Arkadelphia Marl. these assemblages are closely spaced stratigraphically geographically, they provide data on chondrichthyan taxonomic turnover
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenomic Perspective on the Radiation of Ray-Finned Fishes Based Upon Targeted Sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements
    1 A phylogenomic perspective on the radiation of 2 ray-finned fishes based upon targeted sequencing of 3 ultraconserved elements 1;2;∗ 1;2 1 1 4 Michael E. Alfaro , Brant C. Faircloth , Laurie Sorenson , Francesco Santini 1 5 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 6 These authors contributed equally to this work 7 ∗ E-mail: [email protected] arXiv:1210.0120v1 [q-bio.PE] 29 Sep 2012 1 8 Summary 9 Ray-finned fishes constitute the dominant radiation of vertebrates with over 30,000 species. 10 Although molecular phylogenetics has begun to disentangle major evolutionary relationships 11 within this vast section of the Tree of Life, there is no widely available approach for effi- 12 ciently collecting phylogenomic data within fishes, leaving much of the enormous potential 13 of massively parallel sequencing technologies for resolving major radiations in ray-finned 14 fishes unrealized. Here, we provide a genomic perspective on longstanding questions regard- 15 ing the diversification of major groups of ray-finned fishes through targeted enrichment of 16 ultraconserved nuclear DNA elements (UCEs) and their flanking sequence. Our workflow 17 efficiently and economically generates data sets that are orders of magnitude larger than 18 those produced by traditional approaches and is well-suited to working with museum speci- 19 mens. Analysis of the UCE data set recovers a well-supported phylogeny at both shallow and 20 deep time-scales that supports a monophyletic relationship between Amia and Lepisosteus 21 (Holostei) and reveals elopomorphs and then osteoglossomorphs to be the earliest diverging 22 teleost lineages.
    [Show full text]