DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation and Description of Methodologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation and Description of Methodologies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able 1 Example of data recorded from LIT shown in Figure 1. ..........................................................................20 Table 2. Algal lifeform identification chart. Identify the column based on the colour of the alga and then use the information about size, shape and texture to define the relevant row. The lifeform code is shown in the cells with the grey background.....................................................................................................................21 Table 3. Algal lifeforms with representative species..............................................................................................22 Table 4. List of animal lifeform codes and associated taxa. Lifeform codes in bold type represent those which are commonly found using the LIT method. Those underlined occur frequently. ...............................................22 Table 5 - Example of data recorded from quadrat sampling. ................................................................................32 Table 6. Taxa and field codes for the quadrat sampling technique .......................................................................33 Table 7. Data table for quadrat data. ....................................................................................................................34 Table 8 - Example of data recorded from Fish census. .........................................................................................38 Table 9. Fish commonly encountered in the Adelaide metropolitan region. .........................................................39 Table 10. Fish census data table. ..........................................................................................................................40 Figure 1. Schematic view of benthos showing LIT. ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mechanisms of Ecosystem Stability for Kelp Beds in Urban Environments
    Mechanisms of ecosystem stability for kelp beds in urban environments By Simon E Reeves November 2017 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies I DECLARATIONS This declaration certifies that: (i) This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution. (ii) The work contained in this thesis, except where otherwise acknowledged, is the result of my own investigations. (iii) Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used (iv) The thesis is less than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Signed: (Simon Reeves) Date: 1/12/2017 Statement of authority of access This thesis may be available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: (Simon Reeves) Date: 1/12/2017 II 20/7/18 ABSTRACT Ecologists have long been interested in determining the role biotic relationships play in natural systems. Even Darwin envisioned natural systems as "bound together by a web of complex relations”, noting how “complex and unexpected are the checks and relations between organic beings” (On the Origin of Species, 1859, pp 81-83). Any event or phenomenon that alters the implicit balance in the web of interactions, to any degree, can potentially facilitate a re-organisation in structure that can lead to a wholescale change to the stability of a natural system. As a result of the increasing diversity and intensity of anthropogenic stressors on ecosystems, previously well-understood biotic interactions and emergent ecological functions are being altered, requiring a reappraisal of their effects.
    [Show full text]
  • REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY on KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program
    2006-2007 Kangaroo Island Natural Resources ManagementDate2007 Board Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board REEF FISH BIODIVERSITYKangaroo Island Natural ON Resources KANGAROO Management ISLAND Board SEAGRASS FAUNAL BIODIVERSITYREPORT TITLE ON KI Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 1 REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY ON KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program A report prepared for the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board by Daniel Brock Martine Kinloch December 2007 Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 2 Oceans of Blue The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this report are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. The Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. Project Officer Contact Details Martine Kinloch Coast and Marine Program Manager Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4312 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board Contact Details Jeanette Gellard General Manager PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4340 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] © Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board This document may be reproduced in whole or part for the purpose of study or training, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and to its not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Faunal Assemblages and Habitat Types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia
    Relationships between faunal assemblages and habitat types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia Submitted by James Richard Tweedley This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2010 B.Sc (Hons) University of Portsmouth (UK) MRes University of Plymouth (UK) Declaration I declare that the information contained in this thesis is the result of my own research unless otherwise cited, and has as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any university. __________________________________________ James Richard Tweedley Shifting Sands: The sand bar at the mouth of Broke Inlet in (top) summer and (bottom) winter 2008. Bottom photo by Bryn Farmer. Abstract The work for this thesis was undertaken in Broke Inlet, a seasonally-open estuary on the south coast of Western Australia and the only estuary in that region which is regarded as “near-pristine” (Commonwealth of Australia, 2002). The only previous seasonal studies of the environmental and biotic characteristics of this estuary involved broad-based descriptions of the trends in salinity, temperature and ichthyofaunal characteristics at a limited number of sites. Furthermore, no attempt has been made to identify statistically the range of habitats present in the nearshore and offshore waters of this system, and the extents to which the characteristics of the fish and benthic invertebrate faunas are related to habitat type. These types of data provide not only reliable inventories of the habitat and faunal characteristics of Broke Inlet, but also a potential basis for predicting the likely impact of anthropogenic and climatic changes in Broke Inlet in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ([email protected]) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep).
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Records 2021 NSW State Spearfishing Records Flinders Reef S.E.Queensland
    New South Wales Records 2021 NSW State Spearfishing Records Flinders Reef S.E.Queensland ANGELFISH Common Name Scientific Name Division Weight Diver Club Date Location ANGELFISH Pomacanthus semicirculatus Junior Blue Ladies Open NSW 1.020 kg S. Isles BDSC 27/12/1970 Juan & Julia Rocks Australian 3.033 kg R. Jenkinson QLD 1/6/1969 Flinders Reef S.E.Queensland BARRACUDA & PIKE Common Name Scientific Name Division Weight Diver Club Date Location BARRACUDA Syphyraena qenie Junior Blackfin Ladies Open NSW 17.660 kg E. Leeson SSD 13/03/2015 South West Rocks Australian 29.200 kg T. Neilsen UAC 10/5/2006 Cape Moreton Common Name Scientific Name Division Weight Diver Club Date Location BARRACUDA Sphyraena barracuda Junior Giant Ladies 0.865 kg J. Budworth TGCF 4/2/2018 Tweed River Open NSW 21.500 kg E. Bova SSD 18/03/2007 Coffs Harbour Australian 28.850 kg B. Paxman WA 16/4/1993 Dorre Island WA Common Name Scientific Name Division Weight Diver Club Date Location BARRACUDA Sphyraena jello Junior 8.650 kg A. Puckeridge SSD 29/03/2014 North Solitary Island Pickhandle pike Ladies Open NSW 12.927 kg P. Iredale KSC 21/02/1971 Wreck Bay Australian 15.250 kg J. Croton Qld 12/6/2015 Cape Moreton Common Name Scientific Name Division Weight Diver Club Date Location BARRACUDA Sphyraena obtusata Junior 1.700 kg A.Puckeridge SSD 7/1/2013 Coffs Harbour Striped sea pike, Ladies Open NSW 1.700 kg A.Puckeridge SSD 7/1/2013 Nth Solitary Is Australian 1.191 kg K. Wardrop NSW 28/5/1967 Whale beach, NSW Common Name Scientific Name Division Weight Diver Club Date Location BARRACOUTA Thrysites atun Junior Snoek Ladies Open NSW 0.625 kg A.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet, Food Preference, and Algal Availability for Fishes and Crabs on Intertidal Reef Communities in Southern California
    Environmental Biology of Fishes 37: 75-95,1993. 0 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Diet, food preference, and algal availability for fishes and crabs on intertidal reef communities in southern California James P. Barry’ & Michael J. Ehret* A-001 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A. ‘Present address: Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 160 Central Ave., Pacific Grove, CA 93950, U.S.A. 2 Present address: Biology Department, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507, U.S. A. Received 18.9.1991 Accepted 3.9.1992 Key words: Herbivory, Kyphosidae, Girella, Hermosilla, Pachygrapsus, Community structure, Foraging, Chemical ecology Synopsis Herbivory by wide-ranging fishes is common over tropical reefs, but rare in temperate latitudes where the effects of herbivorous fishes are thought to be minimal. Along the west coast of North America, herbivory by fishes on nearshore reefs is largely restricted to a few members of the Kyphosidae, distributed south of Pt. Conception. This paper presents information on natural diets and results from feeding choice experiments for two abundant kyphosids from intertidal habitats in San Diego, California - Girella nigricans and Hermosilla azurea, and similar data for the lined shore crab, Pachygrapsus crassipes, which also forages over intertidal reefs. These results are compared with the availability of algae in intertidal habitats measured during summer and winter, on both disturbed and undisturbed habitats. The diets of juveniles of G. nigricans and H. azurea collected from nearshore habitats were dominated by animal prey (mainly amphipods), but adults of these fishes, and P. crassipes, consumed algae nearly exclusively, with 26,10, and 14 taxa of algae identified from G.
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide Desal Project Baited Remote Underwater Video Survey 2018
    Adelaide Desalination Plant Baited Remote Underwater Video Surveys - 2018 Report to AdelaideAqua Pty Ltd James Brook (J Diversity Pty Ltd) Rev 0, December 2018 ADP BRUV Surveys - 2018 Cover photo: Fish at Noarlunga Tyre Reef, including yellowtail scad Trachurus novaezelandiae and trevally Pseudocaranx spp., April 2018. Acknowledgements Dimitri Colella was the technical and field lead on this project. Trent Brockhouse and Andrew Dendunnen of Whyalla Diving Services, and Sasha Whitmarsh assisted in the field. Dr Bryan McDonald provided advice on statistical analysis and review. Disclaimer The findings and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of AdelaideAqua Pty Ltd. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this report are factually correct, the author does not accept responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the contents. The author does not accept liability for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this report. Preferred citation: Brook, J (2018), Adelaide Desalination Plant Baited Remote Underwater Video Fish Surveys – 2018. Report for AdelaideAqua Pty Ltd, prepared by J Diversity Pty Ltd. Revision history Rev Date Comment Author Reviewed A 11/12/2018 Initial Draft J. Brook D. Colella B 12/12/2018 Minor changes J. Brook B McDonald 0 18/12/2018 Changes in response to review 2 ADP BRUV Surveys - 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between Underwater Visual Census and Baited Remote Underwater Video
    Vol. 400: 19–36, 2010 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 11 doi: 10.3354/meps08377 Mar Ecol Prog Ser A comparison of two survey methods: differences between underwater visual census and baited remote underwater video Madhavi A. Colton*, Stephen E. Swearer Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia ABSTRACT: Essential to any model, conservation or management plan are measures of the distribu- tion and abundance of a species. Countless methods for estimating these parameters exist, making it essential to assess the limitations and biases associated with a particular sampling protocol. Here, we compare between 2 methods commonly used to survey nearshore fish assemblages. Although most commonly employed, underwater visual census (UVC) may yield biased estimates of abundance depending on the strength of a fish’s behavioural response (i.e. avoidance, attraction) to the presence of divers. Baited remote underwater video (BRUV) techniques have shown promise in overcoming some of the limitations of UVC, but are unable to provide an absolute measure of density in turbulent environments. We compare the abilities of these 2 methods to survey the nearshore rocky reef ichthy- ofauna of Southeast Australia. We found that relative to BRUV, UVC recorded more individuals (in terms of all species, herbivores, cryptic species, and most territorial species), higher richness at both the species and family level, and higher biodiversity as measured using the Shannon Index. These findings remain even when the data were adjusted for differences in sampling effort. In contrast, BRUV recorded proportionally more mobile predators, and a more taxonomically distinct population, though only when taxonomic evenness was not taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Longterm Shifts in Abundance and Distribution of a Temperate Fish Fauna
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2011) 20, 58–72 RESEARCH Long-term shifts in abundance and PAPER distribution of a temperate fish fauna: a response to climate change and fishing practicesgeb_575 58..72 Peter R. Last1,2*, William T. White1,2, Daniel C. Gledhill1,2, Alistair J. Hobday1,2, Rebecca Brown3, Graham J. Edgar3 and Gretta Pecl3 1Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO Marine ABSTRACT and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Aim South-eastern Australia is a climate change hotspot with well-documented Hobart TAS 7001, Australia, 2Wealth from Oceans Flagship, CSIRO Marine and recent changes in its physical marine environment. The impact on and temporal Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart responses of the biota to change are less well understood, but appear to be due to TAS 7001, Australia, 3Tasmanian Aquaculture influences of climate, as well as the non-climate related past and continuing human and Fisheries Institute, Private Bag 49, Hobart impacts. We attempt to resolve the agents of change by examining major temporal TAS 7001, Australia and distributional shifts in the fish fauna and making a tentative attribution of causal factors. Location Temperate seas of south-eastern Australia. Methods Mixed data sources synthesized from published accounts, scientific surveys, spearfishing and angling competitions, commercial catches and underwa- ter photographic records, from the ‘late 1800s’ to the ‘present’, were examined to determine shifts in coastal fish distributions. Results Forty-five species, representing 27 families (about 30% of the inshore fish families occurring in the region), exhibited major distributional shifts thought to be climate related. These are distributed across the following categories: species previously rare or unlisted (12), with expanded ranges (23) and/or abundance increases (30), expanded populations in south-eastern Tasmania (16) and extra- limital vagrants (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Interrelationships of the Haploporinae (Digenea: Haploporidae): a Molecular Test of the Taxonomic Framework Based on Morphology
    Parasitology International 58 (2009) 263–269 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Parasitology International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/parint Interrelationships of the Haploporinae (Digenea: Haploporidae): A molecular test of the taxonomic framework based on morphology Isabel Blasco-Costa a,⁎, Juan A. Balbuena a, Aneta Kostadinova b,c, Peter D. Olson d a Marine Zoology Unit, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, PO Box 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain b Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic c Central Laboratory of General Ecology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria d Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK article info abstract Article history: The taxonomic framework of the Haploporidae is evaluated and the relationships within the Haploporinae Received 14 January 2009 are assessed for the first time at the generic level using molecular data. Partial 28S and complete ITS2 rDNA Received in revised form 26 March 2009 sequences from representatives of six of the nine recognised genera within the Haploporinae were analysed Accepted 27 March 2009 together with published sequences representing members of two haploporid subfamilies and of the closely Available online 5 April 2009 related family Atractotrematidae. Molecular analyses revealed: (i) a close relationship between the Atractotrematidae and the Haploporidae; (ii) strong support for the monophyly of the Haploporinae, Di- Keywords: Digenea crogaster and Saccocoelium, and the position of Ragaia within the Haploporinae; (iii) evidence for rejection of Haploporidae the synonymy of Saccocoelioides and Lecithobotrys and the validity of the Dicrogasterinae; and (iv) support Mugilidae for the distinct status of Saccocoelium in relation to Haploporus.
    [Show full text]
  • EIS to Accompany Draft Storm Bay North MFDP
    EIS to accompany draft Storm Bay North MFDP Appendix 13 - Fish Species in Storm Bay from Fishmap (2012) Threatened status TSPA/ Species Name Common Name EPBCA Apogonops anomalus Threespine Cardinalfish Anguilla australis Southern Shortfin Eel Anguilla reinhardtii Longfin Eel Echinophryne mitchellii Spinycoat Anglerfish Histiophryne bougainvilli Smooth Anglerfish Kuiterichthys furcipilis Rough Anglerfish Phyllophryne scortea Whitespotted Anglerfish Aplodactylus arctidens Marblefish Siphamia cephalotes Wood's Siphonfish Vincentia conspersa Southern Cardinalfish Arripis georgianus Australian Herring Arripis trutta Eastern Australian Salmon Arripis truttaceus Western Australian Salmon Atherinason hepsetoides Smallscale Hardyhead Atherinosoma microstoma Smallmouth Hardyhead Kestratherina brevirostris Shortsnout Hardyhead Kestratherina esox Pikehead Hardyhead Leptatherina presbyteroides Silver Fish Latropiscis purpurissatus Sergeant Baker Ecsenius lividanalis Blackass Combtooth Blenny Parablennius tasmanianus Tasmanian Blenny Lophonectes gallus Crested Flounder Bovichtus angustifrons Dragonet Pseudaphritis urvillii Congolli Brachionichthys australis Australian handfish Endangered / CRITICALLY Brachionichthys hirsutus Spotted Handfish ENDANGERED Thymichthys politus Red Handfish -/ CRITICALLY ENDANGERED Thymichthys verrucosus Warty Handfish Callanthias allporti Rosy Perch Callanthias australis Splendid Perch Eocallionymus papilio Painted Stinkfish Callorhinchus milii Elephantfish Pseudocaranx georgianus Silver Trevally Pseudocaranx wrighti Skipjack
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Territorial Gardening Versus Kleptoparasitism by a Subtropical Reef fish (Kyphosus Cornelii) Is Influenced by Territory Defendability
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 4: 561–568 The use of territorial gardening versus kleptoparasitism by a subtropical reef fish (Kyphosus cornelii) is influenced by territory defendability Ian M. Hamilton and Lawrence M. Dill Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada Many territorial herbivorous animals increase the productivity or quality of the prey community on their territory. However, this gardening tactic may be vulnerable to kleptoparasitism unless gardeners can exclude others from the patch. We investigated the influence of territory defendability on the decision of western buffalo bream (Kyphosus cornelii) to defend an algal garden or to leave their territories and invade those of conspecifics. Fish monitored while away from their territories did kleptoparasitize the gardens of conspecifics. We manipulated the structural complexity of territories through the addition of short or tall simulated vegetation. Increasing the height of simulated vegetation on the territory decreased the defendability of territories but increased their safety for fish; territories with tall vegetation were more easily invaded by conspecifics, but fish returned more rapidly to these territories after being disturbed. In a paired experiment, fish spent more time away from their territories (roving) when tall vegetation was added than when short vegetation was added. However, this effect was influenced by depth, with a greater difference between treatments on deeper territories, and by body size, with a greater difference for larger fish. These results support the prediction that territory-holding individuals faced with a trade-off between defending their own garden or kleptoparasitizing from others adjust their use of these tactics based on the defendability of resources.
    [Show full text]