DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change: Main Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change: Main Report $VVHVVPHQWRQ 3HDWODQGV %LRGLYHUVLW\ DQG&OLPDWHFKDQJH Main Report Published By Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur & Wetlands International, Wageningen First Published in Electronic Format in December 2007 This version first published in May 2008 Copyright © 2008 Global Environment Centre & Wetlands International Reproduction of material from the publication for educational and non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from Global Environment Centre or Wetlands International, provided acknowledgement is provided. Reference Parish, F., Sirin, A., Charman, D., Joosten, H., Minayeva, T., Silvius, M. and Stringer, L. (Eds.) 2008. Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change: Main Report. Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur and Wetlands International, Wageningen. Reviewer of Executive Summary Dicky Clymo Available from Global Environment Centre 2nd Floor Wisma Hing, 78 Jalan SS2/72, 47300 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. Tel: +603 7957 2007, Fax: +603 7957 7003. Web: www.gecnet.info; www.peat-portal.net Email: [email protected] Wetlands International PO Box 471 AL, Wageningen 6700 The Netherlands Tel: +31 317 478861 Fax: +31 317 478850 Web: www.wetlands.org; www.peatlands.ru ISBN 978-983-43751-0-2 Supported By United Nations Environment Programme/Global Environment Facility (UNEP/GEF) with assistance from the Asia Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) Design by Regina Cheah and Andrey Sirin Printed on Cyclus 100% Recycled Paper. Printing on recycled paper helps save our natural resources and minimise environmental degradation. Acknowledgements The Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change was initiated by the project on Integrated Management of Peatlands for Biodiversity and Climate Change implemented by Wetlands International and the Global Environment Centre with the support of UNEP- GEF, the governments of the participating pilot countries (China, Indonesia and the Russian Federation) and regions (ASEAN); as well as the Dutch and Canadian governments and a range of other organisations including the Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN). Numerous experts on peatlands, biodiversity and climate change have contributed to the development of the assessment through contributing information and references and reviewing drafts. Contributors of photographs and illustrations including Olivia Bragg, Dan Charman, Viktor Gusev, Hans Joosten, Richard Lindsay, Tatiana Minayeva, Faizal Parish, Marcel Silvius, Andrey Sirin and Steve Zoltai are thanked. Contents Foreword by the Secretariat of the CBD i. Foreword by the United Nations Environment Program ii. Foreword by GEC and Wetlands International iv. Executive Summary v. List of Authors xii. Glossary xiv. List of Figures xvi. List of Tables xx. Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Rationale for the Assessment 1 1.2 Purpose of the Assessment 4 1.3 Outline of the Assessment 6 1.4 Process of preparation of the Assessment 6 1.5 Scope and limitations 6 Chapter 2: What are peatlands? 8 Summary points 8 2.1 Definition 8 2.2 Peatland characteristics 9 2.3 Peat formation 10 2.4 Peatland distribution 11 2.5 Peatland ecology and peatland types 13 References 17 Chapter 3: Peatlands and people 20 Summary points 20 3.1 Human – peatland interactions 20 3.2 Benefits of peatlands 21 3.2.1 Regulation functions (ecosystem services) 22 3.2.2 Production functions 23 3.2.3 Carrier functions 26 3.2.4 Information functions 27 3.3 Peatlands and livelihoods 28 3.4 The root causes of human impacts on peatlands 30 3.5 Conflicts and wise use 33 References 37 Chapter 4: Peatlands and past climate change 39 Summary points 39 4.1 Climate and peatland characteristics 39 4.2 Past climate variability and peatland distribution 42 4.3 Peatland archives of past climate change 46 4.4 Peatland responses to past climate change 48 4.5 Peatland feedbacks to climate change 52 4.6 Recent changes in climate and peatland responses 53 References 56 Chapter 5: Peatlands and biodiversity 60 Summary points 60 Introduction 60 5.1 Peatland biodiversity: what makes peatlands different? 60 5.1.1 Peatlands and the biodiversity concept 62 5.1.2 Peatlands as habitats with specific features 63 5.1.3 Specific features of peatland biodiversity on the species level 65 5.1.4 Specific features of peatland biodiversity on the population level 66 5.1.5 Specific features of peatland biodiversity on the ecosystem level 67 5.1.6 The specific role of peatlands in biodiversity maintenance 71 5.2 The taxonomic biodiversity of peatland 73 5.2.1 Microorganisms and lichens 73 5.2.2 Bryophytes and vascular plants 75 5.2.3 Invertebrates 77 5.2.4 Vertebrates 78 5.3 Human impacts on peatland biodiversity 80 References 91 Chapter 6: Peatlands and carbon 99 Summary points 99 6.1 Peatlands and carbon stock 99 6.2 Carbon accumulation in peatlands 104 6.3 Carbon losses from peatlands 105 6.4 Human impact on peatland carbon 107 References 111 Chapter 7: Peatlands and greenhouse gases 118 Summary points 118 7.1 GHG related to peatlands 118 7.2 Net peatland impact on GHG radiative forcing of the climate 119 7.3 Ecological and environmental control of GHG emission from peatlands 121 7.3.1 General 121 7.3.2 Carbon dioxide 123 7.3.3 Methane 124 7.3.4 Nitrogen oxide 126 7.4 GHG flux rate in natural peatlands 126 7.5 Human influence on GHG flux from peatlands 129 References 133 Chapter 8: Impacts of future climate change on peatlands 139 Summary points 139 8.1 Future climate change scenarios 139 8.2 Impacts of climate change on peatlands 143 8.2.1 Effects of increasing temperatures 143 8.2.2 Effects of precipitation changes 145 8.2.3 Hydrological changes 146 8.2.4 Changes in permafrost and snow cover 149 8.2.5 Sea level rise 150 8.2.6 Carbon dioxide fertilization 151 8.2.7 Other impacts of climate change on peatlands 151 References 152 Chapter 9: Management of peatlands for biodiversity and climate change 155 Summary points 155 9.1 Protection and rehabilitation of peatlands 156 9.1.1 Protection of remaining peatlands 156 9.1.2 Fire prevention and control 157 9.1.3 Rehabilitation of degraded peatlands 158 9.2 Modification of peatland management strategies 161 9.2.1 Improved water management 161 9.2.2 Modification of agricultural practices 163 9.2.3 Modification of livestock management on peatlands 165 9.2.4 Modification of forestry practices 166 9.2.5 Modification of Peat extraction 168 9.3 Integrated management of peatlands 169 9.4 Peatlands in relation to policy processes 170 9.4.1 Peatlands and policy 170 9.4.2 Addressing root causes and enhancing implementation mechanisms 171 9.4.3 New emerging innovative options 172 9.4.4 The need for local policy embedding of innovative mechanisms 174 9.4.5 Harmful subsidies, policies and taxes 176 9.4.6 Synergy between conventions to develop integrated policy frameworks 177 Conclusion 177 References 177 Foreword by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity The seventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), held in Malaysia in 2004, welcomed the proposed Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change. It is with great pleasure to see this significant undertaking present its final conclusions. The Assessment has demonstrated the importance of the biodiversity associated with these ecosystems, the services they provide and their critical role in sustaining livelihoods, especially in tropical areas. The role of peatlands in greenhouse gas regulation has also been clearly articulated. We now need to raise the profile of these ecosystems in the debate on linkages between wetlands, biodiversity and climate change for the conclusions drawn in this assessment demonstrate one of the clearest opportunities for win-win outcomes. We have already moved in this direction. The twelfth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, held in Paris in July 2007, noted the importance of the outcomes of this assessment and requested that the Secretariat of the CBD, in collaboration with the secretariats of relevant multilateral environment agreements and other relevant partners, review opportunities for further action to support the conservation and sustainable use of the biodiversity of tropical forested peatlands, as well as other wetlands, and to report on progress to the ninth meeting of Conference of the Parties in Bonn in May 2008. These concrete steps demonstrate that at Convention level we are serious about paying attention to the issues identified. But the most important need is for this progress to be reflected in real changes to the policies, management and use of peatlands on the ground. The Assessment has helped put these important ecosystems on the map, addressed the important issues and identified the responses that are needed. I would like to thank all of the people involved in contributing to this assessment. I have every confidence that it will make a major difference to improving the long-term sustainability of peatlands and therefore go down in history as a significant contribution towards the achievement of the 2010 biodiversity target. Ahmed Djoghlaf Executive Secretary Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) i Foreword by the United Nations Environment Programme Climate change is emerging as the defining political, as well as environmental, concern of our era. But, while emerging issues, such as avoided deforestation, are increasingly on the agenda, peatlands have been largely left out of formal negotiations under such instruments as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its associated Kyoto Protocol, as well as the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Tropical peat swamps, boreal forests and arctic permafrost regions, as well as temperate bogs, are a true global heritage, occurring in more than 180 countries. Although they cover only 3 percent of the land area, they store nearly 30 per cent of all global soil carbon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES BRACHYTHECIACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 46 – JUNE 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand : mosses. Fascicle 46, Brachytheciaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-65-1 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1. Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.345.16(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/w15y-gz43 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/w15y-gz43 Date submitted: 9 May 2019 ; Date accepted: 15 Aug 2019 Cover image: Eurhynchium asperipes, habit with capsule, moist. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from A.J. Fife 6828, CHR 449024. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Typification...............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium
    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn
    Hikobial3：645-665.2002 Molecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma lar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlｂｃＬ，withspecialre他rencetothe HypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 HIRoMITsuBoTA，ＴｏＭｏＴｓｕＧｕＡＲＩＫＡｗＡ，ＨＩＲｏＹｕＫＩＡＫＩＹＡＭＡ，ＥＦＲＡＩＮＤＥＬｕＮＡ，DoLoREs GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,ARIKAwA,Ｔ,AKIYAMA,Ｈ,,ＤＥＬｕＮＡ,Ｅ,GoNzALEz,，.,HIGucHI,Ｍ ４ ＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2002.Ｍolecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred fiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,ｗｉｔｈspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae andpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665． ▲ Phylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ｉｅ,theHypnales,Leuco- dontales,andHookeriales）havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears Herewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade，andespeciallyonthe Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies，basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat（１）theHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensu Vittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at［＝sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,ｂ])andPlagiothecia‐ ceae(s・str.［＝sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno particularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;ａｎｄ (3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusﾉﾘDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),who suggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean ancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage，fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta (seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000）OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses
    [Show full text]
  • Fontinalis Antipyretica Greater Water-Moss Key 324
    Hypnales Fontinalis antipyretica Greater Water-moss Key 324 Sharply keeled leaf 4 mm Sharply keeled leaf in cross- section 0.5 mm 4 mm Identification This is our largest aquatic moss, with shoots (1.5–) 5–8 mm wide and often exceeding 15 cm in length. The leaves are 4–5 mm long and strongly folded inwards along the midline, with the fold-line forming a prominent keel. The shoots are usually 3-sided, with the keels forming the angles and the overlapping halves of adjacent leaves forming the sides. The leaf lacks a nerve (though it is not easy to unfold the keel and demonstrate this) and its tip is bluntly pointed and untoothed. Capsules are very uncommon, and almost hidden amongst the leaves, occurring only on plants which have undergone a period of exposure above the water. Similar species No other aquatic mosses have strongly keeled leaves like those of F. antipyretica. Like many aquatics, however, the species is very variable and not all plants have shoots which are as neatly 3-sided as the illustrated plants. However, even slender forms and those with more distantly spaced leaves have at least a moderately well- developed keel. Habitat F. antipyretica grows in a wide range of still, slowly or rapidly flowing water bodies, including lakes and ponds, canals, streams and rivers. Plants are usually attached to stones, rocks or waterside trees, but sometimes occur in loose masses on the bottom of shallow, still waters. It tolerates a wide range of water quality, but is usually replaced by F. squamosa (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Neckeropsis and Himantocladium (Neckeraceae, Bryophytina)
    Bry. Div. Evo. 38 (2): 053–070 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & http://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTE EVOLUTION Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bde.38.2.4 Phylogeny of Neckeropsis and Himantocladium (Neckeraceae, Bryophytina) SANNA OLSSON1,2*, JOHANNES ENROTH3*, SANNA HUTTUNEN4 & DIETMAR QUANDT5 1Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland 2INIA Forest Research Centre (INIA-CIFOR), Dept. Forest Ecology and Genetics, Carretera de A Coruña km 7.5, E-28040 Madrid, Spain 3Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Botanical Museum, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland 4Department of Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland 5Nees-Institute for Biodiversity of Plants, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany *Corresponding author: Sanna Olsson, e-mail: [email protected], tel.: +34634509635 or Johannes Enroth, e-mail: Johannes. [email protected], tel.:+3580294157792 Abstract Two closely related tropical genera from the pleurocarpous moss family Neckeraceae are revised: the second largest genus in the family, Neckeropsis, currently with 29 species, and Himantocladium, comprising six species. Twenty-one species of Neckeropsis and five of Himantocladium were included in this study, which is based on phylogenetic analyses using sequence level data from the plastid (rps4)-trnT-trnL-trnF cluster and rpl16 as well as nuclear ITS1 & 2. Neckeropsis ap- peared as polyphyletic. Neckeropsis s. str. comprises 12 species and a further four species, not included in the analysis, are tentatively retained in the genus based on morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12547 Evolution of niche preference in Sphagnum peat mosses Matthew G. Johnson,1,2,3 Gustaf Granath,4,5,6 Teemu Tahvanainen, 7 Remy Pouliot,8 Hans K. Stenøien,9 Line Rochefort,8 Hakan˚ Rydin,4 and A. Jonathan Shaw1 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 2Current Address: Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, Illinois 60022 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden 7Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland 8Department of Plant Sciences and Northern Research Center (CEN), Laval University Quebec, Canada 9Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Museum, Trondheim, Norway Received March 26, 2014 Accepted September 23, 2014 Peat mosses (Sphagnum)areecosystemengineers—speciesinborealpeatlandssimultaneouslycreateandinhabitnarrowhabitat preferences along two microhabitat gradients: an ionic gradient and a hydrological hummock–hollow gradient. In this article, we demonstrate the connections between microhabitat preference and phylogeny in Sphagnum.Usingadatasetof39speciesof Sphagnum,withan18-locusDNAalignmentandanecologicaldatasetencompassingthreelargepublishedstudies,wetested
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Hypnales (Bryophyta) Inferred from ITS2 Sequence-Structure Data Benjamin Merget, Matthias Wolf*
    Merget and Wolf BMC Research Notes 2010, 3:320 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/3/320 SHORT REPORT Open Access A molecular phylogeny of Hypnales (Bryophyta) inferred from ITS2 sequence-structure data Benjamin Merget, Matthias Wolf* Abstract Background: Hypnales comprise over 50% of all pleurocarpous mosses. They provide a young radiation complicating phylogenetic analyses. To resolve the hypnalean phylogeny, it is necessary to use a phylogenetic marker providing highly variable features to resolve species on the one hand and conserved features enabling a backbone analysis on the other. Therefore we used highly variable internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequences and conserved secondary structures, as deposited with the ITS2 Database, simultaneously. Findings: We built an accurate and in parts robustly resolved large scale phylogeny for 1,634 currently available hypnalean ITS2 sequence-structure pairs. Conclusions: Profile Neighbor-Joining revealed a possible hypnalean backbone, indicating that most of the hypnalean taxa classified as different moss families are polyphyletic assemblages awaiting taxonomic changes. Background encompassing a total of 1,634 species in order to test Pleurocarpous mosses, which are mainly found in tropi- the hypothesis that the ITS2 sequence-structure can be cal forests, account for more than 50% of all moss spe- used to determine the phylogeny of Hypnales and to cies [1,2]. Brotherus in 1925 used morphological resolve especially its phylogenetic backbone. A rapid characters to partition the pleurocarpous into three radiation in the early history of pleurocarpous mosses orders. These were Leucodontales (= Isobryales), Hoo- has resulted in low molecular diversity generally, but keriales and Hypnobryales (= Hypnales) [3]. Later mole- particularly in the order Hypnales [5,7].
    [Show full text]
  • (Limpr.) Warnst
    ISSN 2336-3193 Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 123-134, 2019 DOI: 10.2478/cszma-2019-0012 Published: online 1 July 2019, print July 2019 On moss genera Hylocomiadelphus Ochyra & Stebel and Rhytidiadelphus (Limpr.) Warnst. Michael S. Ignatov, Elena A. Ignatova, Oxana I. Kuznetsova & Vladimir E. Fedosov On moss genera Hylocomiadelphus Ochyra & Stebel and Rhytidiadelphus (Limpr.) Warnst. – Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 123-134, 2019. Abstract: The moss family Hylocomiaceae is studied for the generic level taxonomy within a molecular phylogenetic approach. We confirm segregating of the species formerly known as Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus to Hylocomiadelphus Ochyra & Stebel from the genus Rhytidiadelphus . Hylocomiadelphus forms a clade with Loeskeobryum and Meteoriella , sharing with both genera cordate to auriculate leaf bases and non-squarrose leaves, and with the former undulate leaves and reticulate exostome teeth ornamentation. However, Loeskeobryum differs from Hylocomiadelphus in having paraphyllia, while Meteoriella has a straight capsule and reduced peristome, likely caused by its epiphytic ecology. In the group of species closely related to R. squarrosus , in addition to R. subpinnatus , the third species with North Pacific distribution is described as R. pacificum . Macrothamnium is found deeply nested in Rhytidiadelphus , although no nomenclatural implications are suggested at the moment due to insufficient sampling. Hylocomium splendens var. splendens and var. obtusifolium were found intermingled in the phylogenetic tree, indicating no correlation between morphology and variation in ITS region, thus supporting a view that these taxa are merely environmentally induced morphs. Key words: bryophytes, Rhytidiadelphus , Hylocomiadelphus , Hylocomium , Hylocomiaceae, taxono- my, molecular phylogeny, phytogeography, new species, new genera, nomenclature Introduction Despite that the moss family Hylocomiaceae M.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachytheciaceae)
    TAXONOMIC STUDIES IN THE AQUATIC MOSS GENUS PLATYHYPNIDIUM (BRACHYTHECIACEAE) A Thesis by JUSTIN WYNNS Submitted to the Graduate School Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2006 Major Department: Biology TAXONOMIC STUDIES IN THE AQUATIC MOSS GENUS PLATYHYPNIDIUM (BRACHYTHECIACEAE) A Thesis by JUSTIN WYNNS May 2006 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Thesis Committee _______________________________ Mary U. Connell Member, Thesis Committee _______________________________ William R. Buck Member, Thesis Committee _______________________________ Kenneth D. McFarland Member, Thesis Committee _______________________________ Steven W. Seagle Chairperson, Department of Biology _______________________________ Edelma Huntley Dean, Graduate Studies and Research Copyright by Justin Wynns 2006 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT TAXONOMIC STUDIES IN THE AQUATIC MOSS GENUS PLATYHYPNIDIUM (BRACHYTHECIACEAE). (May 2006) Justin Wynns, B. A., University of California – Santa Cruz. M. S., Appalachian State University Thesis Chairperson: Zack Murrell The generic affinities of the aquatic moss genus Platyhypnidium were investigated by several analytic techniques: traditional light microscopy, phenetic analyses of dimensional measurements (Analysis of Variance and Principal Components Analysis), and phylogenetic analyses of morphological and molecular data. Ten rostrate-operculate Brachytheciaceae were closely studied. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA was used as a molecular marker in three of the phylogenetic analyses. Platyhypnidium, represented by P. riparioides, P. aquaticum, P. muelleri, P. fuegianum, and P. pringlei, was compared with five terrestrial species belonging to Rhynchostegium and Eurhynchium. The taxa studied did not form a monophyletic lineage within the family. Platyhypnidium itself was resolved as polyphyletic. Platyhypnidium aquaticum and P. riparioides are closely related to terrestrial species of Rhynchostegium.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List 16 (6): 1663–1671
    16 6 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 16 (6): 1663–1671 https://doi.org/10.15560/16.6.1663 New and noteworthy Hypnales (Bryophyta) records from the Nuluhon Trusmadi Forest Reserve in Borneo Andi Maryani A. Mustapeng1, Monica Suleiman2 1 Forest Research Centre, Sabah Forestry Department, PO Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. 2 Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Corresponding author: Monica Suleiman, [email protected] Abstract Four Hypnales mosses from three pleurocarpous families are recorded in Borneo for the first time. They are Neono­ guchia auriculata (Copp. ex Thér.) S.H. Lin (Meteoriaceae), Oxyrrhynchium bergmaniae (E.B. Bartram) Huttunen & Ignatov (Brachytheciaceae), Thamnobryum latifolium (Bosch & Sande Lac.) Nieuwl. (Neckeraceae), and Trachycladi­ ella sparsa (Mitt.) M. Menzel (Meteoriaceae). The specimens were collected from Nuluhon Trusmadi Forest Reserve in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Descriptions and illustrations of the four species as well as notes on their distribution and distinguishing characteristics are provided. Keywords Malaysian Borneo, moss, Mount Trus Madi, Sabah Academic editor: Navendu Page | Received 17 April 2020 | Accepted 8 November 2020 | Published 9 December 2020 Citation: Andi MAM, Suleiman M (2020) New and noteworthy Hypnales (Bryophyta) records from the Nuluhon Trusmadi Forest Reserve in Borneo. Check List 16 (6): 1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.15560/16.6.1663 Introduction The order Hypnales contains about 4,200 species, which The topography of the NTFR comprises mainly represents one-third of all known moss species (Goffinet mountainous landscapes at the northern part and hilly et al. 2009). Many species of this order do not show spec- landscapes towards the southern part (Sabah Forestry ificity with respect to their substrates and habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Genome of the Aquatic Moss Fontinalis Antipyretica (Fontinalaceae, Bryophyta)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.069583; this version posted April 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Draft genome of the aquatic moss Fontinalis antipyretica (Fontinalaceae, Bryophyta) Jin Yu1,2, Linzhou Li2, Sibo Wang2, Shanshan Dong3, Ziqiang Chen4, Nikisha Patel5, Bernard Goffinet5, Huan Liu2, and Yang Liu2,3* 1BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518083, China 2State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China 3Laboratory of Southern Subtropical Plant Diversity, Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen & Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518004, China 4College of Chinese Medicine Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130012, China 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-3043, USA *Corresponds: [email protected] (Y.L.); +86-13632968356 E-mail addresses for all authors: Jin Yu <[email protected]>, Linzhou Li <[email protected]>, Sibo Wang <[email protected]>, Shanshan Dong <[email protected]>, Ziqiang Chen <[email protected]>, Nikisha Patel < [email protected]>, Bernard Goffinet <[email protected]>, Huan Liu <[email protected]>, and Yang Liu <[email protected]>. ORCIDs: Bernard Goffinet: 0000-0002-2754-3895; Yang Liu: 0000-0002-5942-839X. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.069583; this version posted April 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Moss Habitats Distinctly Affect Their Associated Bacterial Community Structures As Revealed by the High-Throughput Sequencing Method
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (2018) 34:58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2436-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Moss habitats distinctly affect their associated bacterial community structures as revealed by the high-throughput sequencing method Su Wang1 · Jing Yan Tang1 · Jing Ma1 · Xue Dong Li1 · Yan Hong Li1 Received: 23 September 2017 / Accepted: 17 March 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract To better understand the factors that influence the distribution of bacteria associated with mosses, the communities inhabit- ing in five moss species from two different habitats in Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve were investigated using the high-throughput sequencing method. The sequencing was performed based on the bacterial 16S rRNA and 16S rDNA libraries. Results showed that there are abundant bacteria inhabiting in all the mosses sampled. The taxonomic analysis of these bacteria showed that they mainly consisted of those in the phyla Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and seldom were from phylum Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. The hierarchical cluster tree, based on the OTU level, divided the bacteria associated with all samples into two branches according to the habitat types of the host (terrestrial and aquatic). The PCoA diagram further divided the bacterial compositions into four groups according to both types of habitats and the data sources (DNA and RNA). There were larger differences in the bacterial community composition in the mosses col- lected from aquatic habitat than those of terrestrial one, whether at the DNA or RNA level. Thus, this survey supposed that the habitat where the host was growing was a relevant factor influencing bacterial community composition.
    [Show full text]