A Taxonomic Reassessment of the Vittiaceae (Hypnales, Bryopsida): Evidence from Phylogenetic Analyses of Combined Chloroplast an -.: BIONAT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Taxonomic Reassessment of the Vittiaceae (Hypnales, Bryopsida): Evidence from Phylogenetic Analyses of Combined Chloroplast an -.: BIONAT Plant Syst. Evol. (2003) DOI 10.1007/s00606-003-0032-z A taxonomic reassessment of the Vittiaceae (Hypnales, Bryopsida): evidence from phylogenetic analyses of combined chloroplast and nuclear sequence data A. Vanderpoorten1, B. Goffinet2, L. Hedena¨s3, C. J. Cox4, and A. J. Shaw4 1Universite´Catholique de Louvain, Unite´d’Ecologie et Bioge´ographie, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, CT, USA 3Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Gyptogamic Botany, Stockhalm, Sweden 4Department of Biology, Duke University, NC, USA Received November 29, 2001; accepted April 8, 2003 Published online: October 16, 2003 Ó Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract. The Vittiaceae are a small family of including other Amblystegium species suggests aquatic mosses that are defined based on game- that A. serpens may be better accommodated in tophytic traits whose interpretation has led to a distinct genus. Amblystegium serpens is the type conflicting taxonomic arrangements. Phylogenetic species of Amblystegium and thus retains the analyses of two cpDNA regions, trnL-trnF and name. The other species are accommodated in atpB-rbcL, indicate that Vittia is nested within their own genus, Hygroamblystegium, including the Amblystegiaceae s. str., suggesting that the H. fluviatile, H. humile comb. nov., H. notero- family Vittiaceae should not be recognized. phyllum, H. tenax,andH. varium. Platylomella lescurii appears nested within the Thuidiaceae/Leskeaceae. This suggests that the Key words: Vittia, Platylomella, Hygroamblyste- series of character states shared by Vittia and gium, Amblystegiaceae, convergent evolution, Platylomella, including a differentiated leaf bor- aquatic mosses, ITS, atpB-rbcL spacer, trnF-trnL der, short laminal cells, stiff stems, and a thick region. costa, are convergent features that arose inde- pendently in unrelated lineages of aquatic Hyp- Unrelated plant species growing in similar nales. Within the Amblystegiaceae, phylogenetic habitats may often exhibit a similar appearance, analyses of the two cpDNA regions combined a process known as convergent evolution. In with ITS sequence data show that Hypnobartlet- fast flowing waters, plant species often have a tia, Vittia elimbata spec. nov., V. pachyloma, and suite of convergent morphological characters, V. salina, despite their strong morphological similarity to aquatic Amblystegium species, form including extensive attachment to their sub- a clade that is sister to the Drepanocladus/Pseudo- strates, increased tensile strength, increased calliergon complex. This combined clade is unre- flexibility to dissipate energy through elasticity, solved at a polytomy that includes Amblystegium and/or a streamline shape (Suren et al. 2000). serpens and a clade including all the other Mosses, which are common in running waters, Amblystegium species. The occurrence of are rarely flexible but increase strength with a A. serpens outside the strongly supported clade suite of morphological characters such as stiff A. Vanderpoorten et al.: Taxonomic reassessment of the Vittiaceae wiry stems, small thick-walled leaf cells, a strong costa, and a leaf margin composed of many costa, and often pluri-stratose leaf borders or layers of linear, thick-walled cells (Ochyra laminae (Vitt and Glime 1984). 1987a), led to a large number of alternative Due to an assumed greater exposure of the taxonomic placements. Montagne (1838) first moss gametophyte to selective environmental interpreted the taxon, with hesitation, as a pressures, much of the suprageneric classifica- member of Gymnostomum Nees and Hornsch. tion of mosses has traditionally been based on (Pottiaceae), indicating its similarity, especially sporophytic characters. However, the assump- the possession of a thickened leaf border, with tion that gametophytic characters are more Cinclidotus P. Beauv. Subsequently, Hooker labile than sporophytic ones has been chal- and Wilson (1844) transferred the taxon into lenged (e.g. Buck 1991; Buck et al. 2000; Sciaromium (Mitt.) Mitt. within the Amblys- Hedena¨s 1999, 2001, 2002). As a consequence, tegiaceae. This treatment was followed in a number of gametophytic traits were given subsequent classification systems (Vitt 1984) primacy at various taxonomic levels in recent until Ochyra (1987a) erected the monospecific moss classifications. For example, within the genus Vittia and family Vittiaceae to accom- Hypnales, the most diverse of the two orders of modate the taxon. This taxonomic position, pleurocarpous mosses, the thickness of leaf however, remained debatable, and was dis- lamina has been interpreted as an important cussed by Hedena¨s (1995) who interpreted the taxonomic character (Ochyra 1986a) to such taxon as a specialized Amblystegium with a few an extent that new species [e.g. Palustriella autapomorphies presumably connected with pluristratosa Stech and Frahm (Stech and the adaptation to growth in running water. Frahm 2001b)], genera [e.g. Donrichardsia Most recently, Buck and Goffinet (2000) and (Grout) H.A. Crum & L.E. Anderson (Crum Ochyra and Matteri (2001) retained Vittia as a and Anderson 1979), Gradsteinia Ochyra (Och- distinct genus within the Amblystegiaceae. yra 1990, Ochyra et al. 1998), Ochyraea Vana Other taxa with at least partly polystratose (Vana 1986), Richardsiopsis Ochyra (Ochyra leaf laminae and a well-defined leaf border, 1986b)] and, in some cases, families [e.g. the such as Platylomella A. L. Andrews, were also Donrichardsiaceae (Ochyra 1985) and the included in the family (Buck and Goffinet Vittiaceae (Ochyra 1987a)], have been erected 2000). to accommodate peculiar pleurocarpous aqua- In this paper, we use variation in sequences tic mosses with variously multistratose leaf from chloroplast and nuclear loci to clarify the laminae. Recent analyses of morphological phylogenetic relationships of Vittia pachyloma (Hedena¨s 1995, 1997, 1998; Ochyra and Bedn- and the recently described species, V. salina arek-Ochyra 1999; Ochyra and Vanderpoorten Hedena¨s and Munoz (Hedena¨s and Munoz 1999) and molecular data (Stech and Frahm 2002). The analysis also included other aquatic 1999, 2001a; Stech et al. 1999, Vanderpoorten Hypnales to determine whether their morpho- et al. 2001, 2002a) suggest, conversely, that logical similarities reflect common ancestry or these taxa are often extreme expressions nested convergent responses to growth in running within larger genera, including Platyhypnidium waters. Fleisch., Drepanocladus (Mu¨ll. Hal.) Roth, Hygrohypnum Lindb., and Amblystegium Material and methods Schimp. Hence, the taxonomic position of Taxon sampling. Two sampling strategies were many aquatic mosses has been an area of employed, the first to confirm the placement of controversy. For example, the peculiar game- Vittia within the Amblystegiaceae and to assess tophytic features of one such aquatic moss, familial relationships of morphologically similar Vittia pachyloma (Mont.) Ochyra (Vittiaceae), taxa. The second dataset was constructed to assess including multistratose leaf laminae, short sister group relationships within the Amblystegia- laminal cells, a strong, percurrent to excurrent ceae. Vittia and related taxa included six accessions A. Vanderpoorten et al.: Taxonomic reassessment of the Vittiaceae of V. pachyloma from different Chilean provinces; replicates, using simple taxon addition, and saving two accessions of V. salina; one accession of a no more than 20,000 trees per replicate. puzzling aquatic moss from Bolivia previously Within the Amblystegiaceae, the sample of interpreted as an extreme Amblystegium expression; closely related species allowed the use of the internal and three accessions of Platylomella lescurii (Sull.) transcribed spacers (ITS) of the 18S-26S nrDNA, in A. L. Andrews, a rheophilous moss endemic to the combination with the two cpDNA regions. The Appalachian mountains (Table 1). The inclusion of decision to combine the partitions was made after these taxa within the Amblystegiaceae was tested comparing both the topologies and the support for by sampling members of the Amblystegiaceae s. the branches as assessed by nonparametric boot- str., plus representative members of Hypnalean strapping. If a taxon was resolved as part of two families whose potential relationships with the distinct monophyletic clades supported each by Amblystegiaceae have been suggested by morpho- bootstrap proportions of 70% or higher in bootstrap logical (Hedena¨s 1995, 1998; Ochyra and Vander- analyses of individual partitions, these partitions poorten 1999) and molecular data (Vanderpoorten would be considered incongruent (Mason-Gamer et al. 2002b) (dataset 1, appendix 1). These Hyp- and Kellog 1996). In such cases, taxa causing the nalean families include the Anomodontaceae incongruence were removed from the analysis. The (Anomodon Hook. and Tayl.), Thuidiaceae (Thui- ML analyses were conducted as described above. dium Bruch and Schimp, Haplocladium Mu¨ll. Hal., Abietinella Mu¨ll. Hal., Helodium Warnst.), Hyp- Results naceae (Hypnum Hedw., Caribaeohypnum Ando and Higuchi, Ptilium De Not.), Rhytidiaceae The substitution model maximizing the likeli- (Rhytidium (Sull.) Kindb), Brachytheciaceae hood of the neighbor-joining tree derived from (Platyhypnidium), and Leskeaceae (Leskea Hedw.). the first cpDNA dataset ()lnL ¼ 5080.6074) Neckera pennata Hedw. and N. douglasii Hook., was a general time-reversible model (Rodriguez two members of the suborder Neckerineae (Brothe- et al. 1990). The rate heterogeneity among sites rus 1925, De Luna
Recommended publications
  • Palustriella Pluristratosa Spec. Nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a New Aquatic Moss Species with Pluristratose Lamina from Switzerland
    Palustriella pluristratosa spec. nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a new aquatic moss species with pluristratose lamina from Switzerland Autor(en): Stech, Michael / Frahm, Jan-Peter Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Botanica Helvetica Band (Jahr): 111 (2001) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 06.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-73905 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1
    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVANCHERIA Mémoire De L’Herbier Louis-Marie No 30
    PROVANCHERIA Mémoire de l’Herbier Louis-Marie No 30 CATALOGUE DES BRYOPHYTES DU QUÉBEC ET DU LABRADOR Jean Faubert 2007 PROVANCHERIA Mémoire de l’Herbier Louis-Marie Université Laval ISSN 0556-2015 Rédacteur Serge PAYETTE, Conservateur de l’Herbier Louis-Marie Courriel : [email protected] Secrétaire de rédaction Sylvie M. FISET, Herbier Louis-Marie Courriel : [email protected] Téléphone : 418.656.2544 Télécopieur : 418.656.7176 Adresse Herbier Louis-Marie, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, 1030 av. de la Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, G1V OA6 Provancheria, créé en 1966 et dédié à la mémoire de l’Abbé Léon Provancher (1820- 1892), est une série de mémoires paraissant irrégulièrement et consacrés principalement à la floristique, la phytogéographie et la systématique des végétaux. Cette série de mémoires a pour but de permettre la publication de travaux floristiques sur l’est et le nord du Canada, notamment ceux consacrés aux flores régionales dont l’ampleur empêche leur parution dans les périodiques courants. Provancheria veut ainsi mettre à la disposition des phytogéographes et des taxonomistes intéressés à la flore canadienne des données qui autrement devraient rester inédites. Provancheria est principalement distribué en échange de publications similaires. Il est toutefois possible de se procurer les numéros déjà parus dont la liste apparaît à la fin de ce numéro, en s’adressant à la secrétaire de rédaction ou sur le site Web de l’herbier à l’adresse www.herbier.ulaval.ca Dépôt légal : 2007. Bibliothèque nationale du Québec, Bibliothèque nationale du Canada. Le dessin de la page couverture représente Metzgeria furcata, il a été réalisé par Audrey Lachance.
    [Show full text]
  • Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Araştırma Ve Uygulama Ormanının Karayosunu Florasına Katkılar Contrib
    Ursavaş S. Tuttu G. 2020. Anatolian Bryol………………………………………………………………27 Anatolian Bryology http://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/anatolianbryology Anadolu Briyoloji Dergisi Research Article DOI: 10.26672/anatolianbryology.689342 e-ISSN:2458-8474 Online Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Araştırma ve Uygulama Ormanının Karayosunu Florasına Katkılar Serhat URSAVAŞ1* , Gamze TUTTU1 1Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi, Orman Mühendisliği Bölümü, Çankırı, TÜRKİYE Received: 14.02.2020 Revised: 09.03.2020 Accepted: 10.03.2020 Öz 2017-2019 yılları arasında araştırma alanının 44 farklı lokalitesinden toplam 223 karayosunu örneği toplanmıştır. Toplanan örneklerin teşhis edilmesi sonucunda 17 familyaya ait 41 cins ve bu cinslere ait toplam 87 takson tespit edilmiştir. Bu taksonlardan 12 tanesi Çankırı ili için ilk defa kaydedilmiştir. Alanda ciğerotlarına ve boynuzotlarına ait örneklere rastlanmamıştır. İçerdiği takson sayısı bakımından en büyük familyalar; Pottiaceae (22), Grimmiaceae (11), Brachytheciaceae (10), Bryaceae (9), Dicranaceae (6), Orthortichaceae (5), Amblystegiaceae (4) ve Hypnaceae (4)’dir. Anahtar kelimeler: Karayosunu, Flora, Araştırma ve Uygulama Ormanı, Çankırı, Türkiye Contributions to the Moss Flora of the Research and Application Forest of the Faculty of Forestry, Çankırı Karatekin University Abstract From the research area, 223 moss samples were collected from 44 different localities between 2017-2019. As a result of identifying the samples, 87 species and subspecies taxa belonging to 17 families and 41 genera were identified. 12 of these taxa were recorded for the first time in the province of Çankırı. There are no examples of liverwort and hornwort in the area. The largest families in terms of the number of taxa they contain are Pottiaceae (22), Grimmiaceae (11), Brachytheciaceae (10), Bryaceae (9), Dicranaceae (6), Orthortichaceae (5), Amblystegiaceae (4), Hypnaceae (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Keys for the Determination of Families of Pleurocarpous Mosses of Africa
    Keys for the determination of families of pleurocarpous mosses of Africa E. Petit Extracted from: Cléfs pour la determination des familles et des genres des mousses pleurocarpes (Musci) d'AfriqueBull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 48: 135-181 (1978) Translated by M.J.Wigginton, 36 Big Green, Warmington, Peterborough, PE and C.R. Stevenson, 111 Wootton Road, King's Lynn, Norfolk, PE The identification of tropical African mosses is fraught with difficulty, not least because of the sparseness of recent taxonomic literature. Even the determination of specimens to family or genus can be problematical. The paper by Petit (1978) is a valiant attempt to provide workable keys (and short descriptions) to all the families and genera of African pleurocarpous mosses, and remains the only such comprehensive treatment. Whilst the shortcomings of any such keys apply, the keys have nonetheless proved to be of assistance in placing specimens in taxonomic groups. However, for the non-French reader, the use of the keys can be a tedious business, necessitating frequent recourse to dictionaries and grammars. Members of the BBS have made collections in a number of tropical African countries in recent years, including on the BBS expedition to Malawi and privately to Madagascar, Tanzania and Zaire. This provided the impetus for making a translation of Petit's keys. Neither of us is an expert linguist, and doubtless in places, some of the subtleties of the language have escaped us. A rather free translation has sometimes proved necessary in order to give the sense of the text. Magill's Glossarium Polyglottum Bryologicae has been valuable in assisting with technical terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Apn80: Northern Spruce
    ACID PEATLAND SYSTEM APn80 Northern Floristic Region Northern Spruce Bog Black spruce–dominated peatlands on deep peat. Canopy is often sparse, with stunted trees. Understory is dominated by ericaceous shrubs and fine- leaved graminoids on high Sphagnum hummocks. Vegetation Structure & Composition Description is based on summary of vascular plant data from 84 plots (relevés) and bryophyte data from 17 plots. l Moss layer consists of a carpet of Sphag- num with moderately high hummocks, usually surrounding tree bases, and weakly developed hollows. S. magellanicum dominates hum- mocks, with S. angustifolium present in hollows. High hummocks of S. fuscum may be present, although they are less frequent than in open bogs and poor fens. Pleurozium schre- beri is often very abundant and forms large mats covering drier mounds in shaded sites. Dicranum species are commonly interspersed within the Pleurozium mats. l Forb cover is minimal, and may include three-leaved false Solomon’s seal (Smilacina trifolia) and round-leaved sundew (Drosera rotundifolia). l Graminoid cover is 5-25%. Fine-leaved graminoids are most important and include three-fruited bog sedge (Carex trisperma) and tussock cottongrass (Eriophorum vagi- natum). l Low-shrub layer is prominent and dominated by ericaceous shrubs, particularly Lab- rador tea (Ledum groenlandicum), which often has >25% cover. Other ericads include bog laurel (Kalmia polifolia), small cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos), and leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata). Understory trees are limited to scattered black spruce. l Canopy is dominated by black spruce. Trees are usually stunted (<30ft [10m] tall) with 25-75% cover . Some sites have scattered tamaracks in addition to black spruce.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES BRACHYTHECIACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 46 – JUNE 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand : mosses. Fascicle 46, Brachytheciaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-65-1 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1. Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.345.16(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/w15y-gz43 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/w15y-gz43 Date submitted: 9 May 2019 ; Date accepted: 15 Aug 2019 Cover image: Eurhynchium asperipes, habit with capsule, moist. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from A.J. Fife 6828, CHR 449024. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Typification...............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium
    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Annales Botanici Fennici 34: 47-49
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 34: 47–49 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 7 March 1997 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1997 Taxonomic position of Leptocladium and new synonymy in Chinese Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida) Johannes Enroth Enroth, J., Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Systematic Biology, P.O. Box 47, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Received 20 December 1996, accepted 20 December 1996 Leptocladium sinense Broth., the single species of its genus and known only from type material from Yunnan, South China, is redescribed and illustrated with line drawings. It is transferred from the Thuidiaceae (original placement) to the Amblystegiaceae and considered closely related to Platydictya Berk. Amblystegiella yunnanensis Broth. is synonymized with Amblystegium serpens (Hedw.) B. S. G. and Amblystegium sinensi- subtile C. Müll. with Platydictya subtilis (Hedw.) Crum. Key words: Amblystegiaceae, Leptocladium, mosses, nomenclature, Platydictya, taxonomy Leptocladium sinense Broth. was described by to the Amblystegiaceae and is closely related to Brotherus (1929). Subsequently, no further species Platydictya Berk. have been added to the genus, which has thus re- mained unispecific. The taxon is only known from the type specimen from Yunnan in South China Leptocladium sinense Broth. (Fig. 1) (cf. Redfearn et al. 1996). Since Brotherus, the type Symb. Sin. 4: 97. 3 f. 13. 1929. — Type: China. “Prov. has apparently not been examined by anyone. Yünnan bor.-occid.: Prope fines Tibeto-Birmanicas inter The original placement of Leptocladium fluvios Lu-djiang (Salween) et Djiou-djiang (Irrawadi or. sinense was the Thuidiaceae, which in Brotherus’s sup.), in jugi Tschiangschel, 27º52´, ad rupes”, 3 800–4 050 m, time was understood in a much wider sense than 4.VII.1916 Handel-Mazzetti 9324, “Diar.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4 Appendices
    Part 4 Appendices HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 139 Appendix 1. Proclamation of Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve 140 MANAGEMENT PLAN HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 141 142 MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix 2. Native Fauna of the HIMI Marine Reserve Listed Under the EPBC Act Scientific Name Common Name Birds recorded as breeding Aptenodytes patagonicus king penguin S Catharacta lonnbergi subantarctic skua S Daption capense cape petrel S Diomeda exulans wandering albatross V S M B J A Diomeda melanophrys black–browed albatross S M B A Eudyptes chrysocome southern rockhopper penguin S Eudyptes chrysolophus macaroni penguin S Larus dominicanus kelp gull S Macronectes giganteus southern giant petrel E S M B A Oceanites oceanicus Wilson’s storm petrel S M J Pachyptila crassirostris fulmar prion S Pachyptila desolata Antarctic prion S Pelecanoides georgicus South Georgian diving petrel S Pelecanoides urinatrix common diving petrel S Phalacrocorax atriceps (e) Heard Island cormorant V S Phoebetria palpebrata light mantled sooty albatross S M B A Pygoscelis papua gentoo penguin S Sterna vittata Antarctic tern V S Non–breeding birds Catharacta maccormicki south polar skua S M J Diomedea epomophora southern royal albatross V S M B A Fregetta grallaria white–bellied storm petrel S Fregetta tropica black–bellied storm petrel S Fulmarus glacialoides southern fulmar S Garrodia nereis grey–backed storm petrel S Halobaena caerulea blue petrel V S Macronectes halli northern giant petrel V S M B A Pachyptila belcheri
    [Show full text]
  • Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn
    Hikobial3:645-665.2002 Molecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma lar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlbcL,withspecialre他rencetothe HypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 HIRoMITsuBoTA,ToMoTsuGuARIKAwA,HIRoYuKIAKIYAMA,EFRAINDELuNA,DoLoREs GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA,H、,ARIKAwA,T,AKIYAMA,H,,DELuNA,E,GoNzALEz,,.,HIGucHI,M 4 &DEGucHI,H、2002.Molecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred fiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,withspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae andpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665. ▲ Phylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ie,theHypnales,Leuco- dontales,andHookeriales)havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears Herewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade,andespeciallyonthe Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies,basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat(1)theHypnales(sstr.[=sensu Vittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at[=sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,b])andPlagiothecia‐ ceae(s・str.[=sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno particularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;and (3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusノリDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),who suggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean ancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage,fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta (seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000)OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Fruticose Species
    Appendix 5.2-1 Vegetation Technical Appendix APPENDIX 5.2‐1 Vegetation Technical Appendix Contents Section Page Ecological Land Classification ............................................................................................................ A5.2‐1‐1 Geodatabase Development .............................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐1 Vegetation Community Mapping ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ A5.2‐1‐3 Limitations of Ecological Land Classification .................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Field Data Collection ......................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Supplementary Results ..................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐4 Rare Vegetation Species and Rare Ecological Communities ........................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Supplementary Desktop Results ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Field Methods ................................................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐16 Supplementary Results ................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐17 Weed Species
    [Show full text]