DOCSLIB.ORG

Palustriella Pluristratosa Spec. Nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a New Aquatic Moss Species with Pluristratose Lamina from Switzerland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palustriella Pluristratosa Spec. Nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a New Aquatic Moss Species with Pluristratose Lamina from Switzerland Palustriella pluristratosa spec. nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a new aquatic moss species with pluristratose lamina from Switzerland Autor(en): Stech, Michael / Frahm, Jan-Peter Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Botanica Helvetica Band (Jahr): 111 (2001) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 06.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-73905 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Bot. Helv. 111/2 (2001): 139-150 0253-1453/020139-12 $ 1.50+0.20/0 © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2001 Botanica Helvetica Palustriella pluristratosa spec. nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a new aquatic moss species with pluristratose lamina from Switzerland Michael Stech1 and Jan-Peter Frahm2 institute of Biology, Systematic Botany and Plant Geography, Free University of Berlin, Altensteinstraße 6.D-14195 Berlin, Germany 2Botanical Institute of the University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, D-53115 Bonn, Germany Manuscript accepted August 21,2001 Abstract Stech M. and Frahm J.-P. 2001. Palustriella pluristratosa spec. nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a new aquatic moss species with pluristratose lamina from Switzerland. Bot. Helv. 111:139-150. Palustriella pluristratosa spec. nov. is described from Switzerland as the fourth European species of aquatic pleurocarpous mosses with variously pluristratose laminae. According to a maximum parsimony analysis of a combined data set of cpDNA trnL intron and partial nrDNA ITS2 sequences, this species belongs to the Amblystegiaceae and is closely related to Palustriella commutata. The trnL intron and ITS2 sequences of both species are completely identical. Morphologically, both species are also similar, but P. pluristratosa is distinguished by the 2-3-stratose lamina, a stronger ill-defined costa, slightly narrower laminai cells and the lack of paraphyllia. Key words: Palustriella pluristratosa spec, nov.; trnLjjaa intron; ITS2; Amblystegiaceae. Introduction During the annual fieldtrip of the Central European Bryological and Lichenologi- cal Working Group (BLAM) in the canton Valais (Switzerland), the second author found an unknown aquatic moss in a stream in the subalpine belt at 1800 m altitude on gneiss rocks, which was conspicuously rigid. It much resembled submerse forms of 139 140 Michael Stech and Jan-Peter Frahm Palustriella commutata (Hedw.) Ochyra (Cratoneuron commutation [Hedw.] Roth) growing in fast flowing streams, which had been described as var.falcata (Brid.) Ochyra or on species level as Palustriella falcata (Brid.) Hedenäs. However, a microscopic examination revealed that the leaves had a pluristratose lamina and a very strong, ill defined costa. Since the mid 80's, several aquatic pleurocarpous mosses with variously pluristratose laminae and strong costae have been described in mostly monospecific genera, both from Europe (Ochyraea tatrensis Vâna from the Tatra Mountains, Slovakia, Vâna 1986; Gradsteinia torrenticola from Tenerife, Ochyra et al. 1998; Platyhypnidium muta- tum Ochyra and Vanderpoorten from the Black Forest, Germany, Ochyra and Vander- poorten 1999), and from overseas (Hypnobartlettia fontana Ochyra from New Zealand, Ochyra 1985a; Koponenia holoneuron [Herz.] Ochyra from Bolivia, Ochyra 1985b; Gradsteinia andicola Ochyra from Colombia, Ochyra 1990; Table 1). In their first descriptions, these species were called "remarkable" (Ochyraea, Gradsteinia), "unique" (Hypnobartlettia) or "mysterious" (Platyhypnidium mutation), to express their special combination of characters in contrast to other aquatic mosses, which sometimes also have a strong costa, e.g., Hygroamblystegium noterophilum (Sull.) Warnst, (see Mönke- meyer 1927, Fig. 162c), but unistratose laminae. For the genera with variously pluristratose laminae mentioned above, Ochyra (1985a) established the families Donrichardsiaceae (species with partially pluristratose laminae or pluristratose leaf borders, and foliose pseudoparaphyllia), and Hypnobartlettiaceae (species with completely bistratose laminae, filamentous para- phyllia and foliose pseudoparaphyllia). However, the taxonomic status of both families as well as of the monospecific genera remained doubtful due to the absence of sporophytes and the curious distribution patterns of the species, which are all very rare and mostly only known from their respective type localities (Stech and Frahm 2000). Recent molecular and morphological analyses (Table 2) clearly showed that both families are artificial and have to be rejected, as the species belong to either Amblyste- giaceae or Brachytheciaceae. In the case of Platyhypnidium mutatum, molecular data (in combination with the finding of sporophytes) were also able to clarify the taxonomic status of the species and to determine its nearest relative. While it was originally intended to describe this moss as a new species of Donrichardsia, both DNA sequences and sporophyte morphology supported a close relationship with Platyhypnidium riparioides in the Brachytheciaceae (Stech and Frahm 1999), which grows abundantly at the type locality of P. mutation. It was supposed that P. mutatum was derived from P. riparioides by mutations of genes responsible for the formation of its different gametophytic characters, a broader costa and an irregularly bi- or pluristratose lamina. This study initiated Ochyra and Bednarek-Ochyra (1999) to transfer Gradsteinia torrenticola also into Platyhypnidium. In contrast, the genera Hypnobartlettia, Gradsteinia (for G. andicola) and Ochyraea have to be maintained, because 1) all of these species exhibit different combinations of gametophytic characters and 2) their nearest relatives could not be identified at the molecular level. In this study, the new moss from Switzerland is investigated based on gametophytic characters and molecular data (cpDNA fruLUAA intron and nrDNA ITS2 sequences) and compared with the other species of the former Donrichardsiaceae and Hypnobartlettiaceae, with the aim to clarify its familiar and generic placement, and to test the proposal of R. Ochyra, who kindly studied the material, to describe it as a new species of Platyhypnidium. Botanica Helvetica 111/2,2001 141 (N en in ON i> in en ON ON. NO 00 m t> NO ON CS T-H 00 ON. o ono o ON o ON Oo-f 00 NO t-h ON On On ON ON s- in O O in o oON en S3 o o On ^h en en ON Oo Oo On On 00 o ON On o o T-H NO o o NO À CS 00hh00 TO ^<N t-H t-H hooo Sil CS ON O t-h O O t-H t-H o o no no ÇN ITj en en en m no m cs no en en en en cs en en en en cs in I S T—H HnS ; -1 CS CS ° T-H T-H O es cs CS CS T-H PfN t-H O es es cs cs cs p o £ £ £ Ph PH £ £ P. Ph oH-s Ph>< PH PH Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph !| < << << <<< << << << << << a < no en ^h G- în NO T-H es T-H in G- en in cs >n on 00 cs in i> en CS T-H S" Cxi 00 00 ooo o t-h^ oo es en g- 00 O i> g- r- o o ONo o o ° £ m On t-h on in m m mnrH m On CO >n cs\ On On O ON ON ON ON in On On g D 00 O rH no oo ON CS CS CS t-H (NO(N oo en> o o g o O NO o o ON O NO ON no NO CS On es in in no t-h no in on en NO NO NO NO NO CS NO NO CS NO CS U t- > J CS t-H O T-H T-H O CS t-h CS cs CS CS cs CS cs t-H CS O o o o o p Ph o " 5 £ £ Pu >-<w S Ë >h PH PH Ph Ph* Ph Ph Ph tin Ph >H p- Ph Ph c << << << <:<< <<:<< << % <!<£ c C z w z iL Qf^ Q QW M Cu « II!/££ O i~) ON P P ON ° 0 t-CS -o ^00 >^OCQ ON ON oo t-h en in S" On S 00 Ono NO ON ON O ON o 00 ON ON X? £ in ^ r- -x G h- O 00 » £ C- ON g in rn £ oo on o ON O ON ON t-H O NO t-H T-H ^ s ^ £ g CS ON g- w r~t NO T-H t: S |S§t en 2cs C^h en t-h X 00 X) 00 T-Ho O • en O PS O ^ ° ^c C oo ^ oo cW S ^ ^00 00 O I H ON Z2 ~0 m s •OhOn ON Ti oc ^ O _• HH-H on 9 ^cs H a ^ Qht-H t ffl WCQ go CQ S? E «s ^ C1 Ë S G S £ £ £ S s GH r- 5 rN 4-1 O CD p^£ 3 -S XPJhJIo o o ^ p! g|-S "2 -G P sz sz sz Gon 2 Ü <uoXG cd a) <D o <uoXcd S.s-g S cd cd cd cd cd t*- 3 Tl- g p P o-C e _0 u 5—I JO 2 G i S *~i }-H o 3 £ 3 H—' CS <T rTTrVH r*T rT" r<-H ri _ _ 5 CL, CL, • £ en Ph cnoq <! £ ffi c/3 c/a u£ffl S en ON PH 00 > p Ul, Ü -o T3 T3 "O O G G C C cd cd cd cd c ï>^ pGh >*"ëd >•> >^2 >1 cd cd _i _> cd ïn G a> G G (U cd G o G X) P .2 ^^GcdccG-ScGGGG^O cd cd cd cd <D G tuG (.ucd cds cd G cd G G »7-t 5—i S N ri 3 NI M _X ty OJj G Ë a a § s o cd - cd G _-C ^ ËEaNgEEaa«.si e I .Hz 1 ^ L_ »—Ià—, '•—, u S L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Check- and Red List of Bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003)
    Preslia, Praha, 75: 193–222, 2003 193 Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003) Seznam a Červený seznam mechorostů České republiky (2003) Jan K u č e r a 1 and Jiří Vá ň a 2 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Kučera J. & Váňa J. (2003): Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003). – Preslia, Praha, 75: 193–222. The second version of the checklist and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic is provided. Generally accepted infraspecific taxa have been incorporated into the checklist for the first time. With respect to the Red List, IUCN criteria version 3.1 has been adopted for evaluation of taxa, and the criteria used for listing in the respective categories are listed under each red-listed taxon. Taxa without recent localities and those where extinction has not been proven are listed as a subset of DD taxa. Little known and rare non-threatened taxa with incomplete knowledge of distribution which are worthy of further investigation are listed on the so-called attention list. In total, 849 species plus 5 subspecies and 19 varieties have been accepted. 23 other historically reported species and one va- riety were evaluated as doubtful with respect to unproven but possible occurrence in the territory, and 6 other species with proven occurrence require taxonomic clarification.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1
    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Physical Factors Affecting Bryophyte Physiology and Growth
    Glime, J. M. 2020. Stream Factors Affecting Bryophyte Physiology and Growth. Chapt. 2-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. 2-2-1 Volume 4. Habitats and Roles. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 21 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 2-2 STREAM FACTORS AFFECTING BRYOPHYTE PHYSIOLOGY AND GROWTH TABLE OF CONTENTS pH and Alkalinity ................................................................................................................................................................... 2-2-2 CO2 Relationships .................................................................................................................................................................. 2-2-7 pH .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2-2-8 CO2 and Boundary Layer Resistance ........................................................................................................................... 2-2-10 Microbial CO2 .............................................................................................................................................................. 2-2-11 Diving Bell ................................................................................................................................................................... 2-2-12 Nutrient Availability ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keys for the Determination of Families of Pleurocarpous Mosses of Africa
    Keys for the determination of families of pleurocarpous mosses of Africa E. Petit Extracted from: Cléfs pour la determination des familles et des genres des mousses pleurocarpes (Musci) d'AfriqueBull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 48: 135-181 (1978) Translated by M.J.Wigginton, 36 Big Green, Warmington, Peterborough, PE and C.R. Stevenson, 111 Wootton Road, King's Lynn, Norfolk, PE The identification of tropical African mosses is fraught with difficulty, not least because of the sparseness of recent taxonomic literature. Even the determination of specimens to family or genus can be problematical. The paper by Petit (1978) is a valiant attempt to provide workable keys (and short descriptions) to all the families and genera of African pleurocarpous mosses, and remains the only such comprehensive treatment. Whilst the shortcomings of any such keys apply, the keys have nonetheless proved to be of assistance in placing specimens in taxonomic groups. However, for the non-French reader, the use of the keys can be a tedious business, necessitating frequent recourse to dictionaries and grammars. Members of the BBS have made collections in a number of tropical African countries in recent years, including on the BBS expedition to Malawi and privately to Madagascar, Tanzania and Zaire. This provided the impetus for making a translation of Petit's keys. Neither of us is an expert linguist, and doubtless in places, some of the subtleties of the language have escaped us. A rather free translation has sometimes proved necessary in order to give the sense of the text. Magill's Glossarium Polyglottum Bryologicae has been valuable in assisting with technical terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrifying Springs in Wales
    Article Petrifying Springs in Wales Jonathan Graham and Gareth Farr report on the first systematic survey of ‘tufa’ springs in Wales rAbove. Tufa associated with the Carboniferous Limestone forms on a vertical coastal rock face at Fedw Fawr, Anglesey. In the background Jonathan Graham can be seen hard at work. G. Farr ost bryologists are familiar with Twenty seven sites at fifteen locations were petrifying or ‘tufa’ springs as they surveyed during November 2013 and January are a habitat where bryophytes 2014, a wet but not exceptionally cold Welsh Moften predominate. In Britain, these springs winter. The sites ranged from natural locations and seepages are often associated with the such as the vertical cliff seepage faces on the pleurocarpous moss Palustriella commutata. The Anglesey coastline (Fig. 1) to those highly importance of petrifying springs in Europe is influenced by historic anthropogenic activities. further highlighted by their inclusion within An example of the later was a site associated with the EC Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) as the highly calcareous, hyperalkaline (>pH 12) waters Annex 1 habitat: H7220 Petrifying springs with leaching from the base of spoil heaps at Herbert’s tufa formation (Cratoneurion). The authors Quarry, Mynydd Du (The Black Mountain) were commissioned by Natural Resources Wales (Fig. 2). (NRW) to survey a range of Welsh sites; the aim From the outset, the project aimed to combine was to provide a baseline dataset for the habitat, both botanical and hydrogeological investigations whilst also fulfilling the EC Habitat Directive’s of the sites including: species-richness, water requirement to record the condition of this chemistry, water supply mechanisms, geological Annex 1 habitat (see Farr et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4, Chapter 2-4: Streams: Structural Modifications
    Glime, J. M. 2020. Streams: Structural Modifications – Rhizoids, Sporophytes, and Plasticity. Chapt. 2-4. In: Glime, J. M. 2-4-1 Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 21 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 2-4 STREAMS: STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS – RHIZOIDS, SPOROPHYTES, AND PLASTICITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Rhizoids and Attachment .................................................................................................................................... 2-4-2 Effects of Submersion .................................................................................................................................. 2-4-2 Effects of Flow on Rhizoid Production ........................................................................................................ 2-4-4 Finding and Recognizing the Substrate ........................................................................................................ 2-4-6 Growing the Right Direction ........................................................................................................................ 2-4-8 Rate of Attachment ...................................................................................................................................... 2-4-8 Reductions and Other Modifications ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annales Botanici Fennici 34: 47-49
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 34: 47–49 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 7 March 1997 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1997 Taxonomic position of Leptocladium and new synonymy in Chinese Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida) Johannes Enroth Enroth, J., Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Systematic Biology, P.O. Box 47, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Received 20 December 1996, accepted 20 December 1996 Leptocladium sinense Broth., the single species of its genus and known only from type material from Yunnan, South China, is redescribed and illustrated with line drawings. It is transferred from the Thuidiaceae (original placement) to the Amblystegiaceae and considered closely related to Platydictya Berk. Amblystegiella yunnanensis Broth. is synonymized with Amblystegium serpens (Hedw.) B. S. G. and Amblystegium sinensi- subtile C. Müll. with Platydictya subtilis (Hedw.) Crum. Key words: Amblystegiaceae, Leptocladium, mosses, nomenclature, Platydictya, taxonomy Leptocladium sinense Broth. was described by to the Amblystegiaceae and is closely related to Brotherus (1929). Subsequently, no further species Platydictya Berk. have been added to the genus, which has thus re- mained unispecific. The taxon is only known from the type specimen from Yunnan in South China Leptocladium sinense Broth. (Fig. 1) (cf. Redfearn et al. 1996). Since Brotherus, the type Symb. Sin. 4: 97. 3 f. 13. 1929. — Type: China. “Prov. has apparently not been examined by anyone. Yünnan bor.-occid.: Prope fines Tibeto-Birmanicas inter The original placement of Leptocladium fluvios Lu-djiang (Salween) et Djiou-djiang (Irrawadi or. sinense was the Thuidiaceae, which in Brotherus’s sup.), in jugi Tschiangschel, 27º52´, ad rupes”, 3 800–4 050 m, time was understood in a much wider sense than 4.VII.1916 Handel-Mazzetti 9324, “Diar.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn
    Hikobial3：645-665.2002 Molecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma lar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlｂｃＬ，withspecialre他rencetothe HypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 HIRoMITsuBoTA，ＴｏＭｏＴｓｕＧｕＡＲＩＫＡｗＡ，ＨＩＲｏＹｕＫＩＡＫＩＹＡＭＡ，ＥＦＲＡＩＮＤＥＬｕＮＡ，DoLoREs GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,ARIKAwA,Ｔ,AKIYAMA,Ｈ,,ＤＥＬｕＮＡ,Ｅ,GoNzALEz,，.,HIGucHI,Ｍ ４ ＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2002.Ｍolecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred fiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,ｗｉｔｈspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae andpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665． ▲ Phylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ｉｅ,theHypnales,Leuco- dontales,andHookeriales）havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears Herewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade，andespeciallyonthe Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies，basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat（１）theHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensu Vittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at［＝sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,ｂ])andPlagiothecia‐ ceae(s・str.［＝sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno particularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;ａｎｄ (3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusﾉﾘDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),who suggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean ancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage，fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta (seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000）OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Publications 1974 – 2019
    W. SZAFER INSTITUTE OF BOTANY POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Ryszard Ochyra BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PUBLICATIONS 1974 – 2019 KRAKÓW 2019 Ochyraea tatrensis Váňa Part I. Monographs, Books and Scientific Papers Part I. Monographs, Books and Scientific Papers 5 1974 001. Ochyra, R. (1974): Notatki florystyczne z południowo‑wschodniej części Kotliny Sandomierskiej [Floristic notes from southeastern part of Kotlina Sandomierska]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 360 Prace Botaniczne 2: 161–173 [in Polish with English summary]. 002. Karczmarz, K., J. Mickiewicz & R. Ochyra (1974): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exsiccati. Fasciculus III, Nr 101–150. 12 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 1975 003. Karczmarz, K., J. Mickiewicz & R. Ochyra (1975): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exsiccati. Fasciculus IV, Nr 151–200. 13 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 004. Karczmarz, K., K. Jędrzejko & R. Ochyra (1975): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exs‑ iccati. Fasciculus V, Nr 201–250. 13 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 005. Karczmarz, K., H. Mamczarz & R. Ochyra (1975): Hepaticae Europae Orientalis Exsiccatae. Fasciculus III, Nr 61–90. 8 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 1976 006. Ochyra, R. (1976): Materiały do brioflory południowej Polski [Materials to the bry‑ oflora of southern Poland]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 432 Prace Botaniczne 4: 107–125 [in Polish with English summary]. 007. Ochyra, R. (1976): Taxonomic position and geographical distribution of Isoptery‑ giopsis muelleriana (Schimp.) Iwats. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 22: 129–135 + 1 map as insertion [with Polish summary]. 008. Karczmarz, K., A. Łuczycka & R. Ochyra (1976): Materiały do flory ramienic środkowej i południowej Polski. 2 [A contribution to the flora of Charophyta of central and southern Poland. 2]. Acta Hydrobiologica 18: 193–200 [in Polish with English summary].
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Mediterranea 26
    FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, Electronic Version 11-Mar-00
    Catalog of the Colorado Flora: a Biodiversity Baseline Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, electronic version 11-Mar-00 Amblystegiaceae Amblystegium Bruch & Schimper, 1853 Amblystegium serpens (Hedwig) Bruch & Schimper var. juratzkanum (Schimper) Rau & Hervey WEBER73B. Amblystegium juratzkanum Schimper. Calliergon (Sullivant) Kindberg, 1894 Calliergon cordifolium (Hedwig) Kindberg WEBER73B; HERMA76. Calliergon giganteum (Schimper) Kindberg Larimer Co.: Pingree Park, 2960 msm, 25 Sept. 1980, [Rolston 80114), !Hermann. Calliergon megalophyllum Mikutowicz COLO specimen so reported is C. richardsonii, fide Crum. Calliergon richardsonii (Mitten) Kindberg WEBER73B. Campyliadelphus (Lindberg) Chopra, 1975 KANDA75 Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus (Bridel) Kanda HEDEN97. Campylium chrysophyllum (Bridel) J. Lange. WEBER63; WEBER73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum chrysophyllum Bridel. HEDEN97. Campyliadelphus stellatus (Hedwig) Kanda KANDA75. Campylium stellatum (Hedwig) C. Jensen. WEBER73B. Hypnum stellatum Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum Fleischer, 1914 HEDEN97 Campylophyllum halleri (Hedwig) Fleischer HEDEN97. Nova Guinea 12, Bot. 2:123.1914. Campylium halleri (Hedwig) Lindberg. WEBER73B; HERMA76. Hypnum halleri Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum hispidulum (Bridel) Hedenäs HEDEN97. Campylium hispidulum (Bridel) Mitten. WEBER63,73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum hispidulum Bridel. HEDEN97. Cratoneuron (Sullivant) Spruce, 1867 OCHYR89 Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedwig) Spruce WEBER73B. Drepanocladus (C. Müller) Roth, 1899 HEDEN97 Nomen conserv. Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedwig) Warnstorf WEBER73B.
    [Show full text]