DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—Senate S5578

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

S5578 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE May 24, 2001 they don’t have to work two or three Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, as you undeniably distinguished career as an obvi- jobs to try to make end’s meet. know, we have been trying to make ously exceptional lawyer with an enormous There is an important agenda ahead sure that the Justice Department has breadth of directly relevant experience. of us. I have touched on only a few its full complement of leaders because I have known Laurence Tribe for a items I hope we will consider. Now that if there is a more important Depart- long time. I have a great deal of re- we have this change in leadership in ment in this Government, I don’t know spect for him. I do not always agree the Senate, it is important we address which one it is. There may be some with him, but one time he asked me to it on a bipartisan basis. It is a unique that would rate equally but that De- review one of his books. Looking back day in the history of the Senate. It is partment does more to help the people on that review, I was a little tough on a unique challenge to all to rise above of this country than any other Depart- Larry Tribe to a degree. But I spent partisanship and put our country first. ment. time reading his latest hornbook just I yield the floor and suggest the ab- One of the most important jobs in this last week, read it through from be- sence of a quorum. that Department is the Solicitor Gen- ginning to end—I think it was some- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The eral’s job. The Solicitor General is the thing like 1,200 pages—it was very dif- clerk will call the roll. attorney for the people. He is the at- ficult reading, and I have to say I came The legislative clerk proceeded to torney for the President. He is the at- away after reading that hornbook with call the roll. torney for the Department. He is the a tremendous respect for the legal ge- Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I ask attorney who is to argue the constitu- nius of Larry Tribe. unanimous consent that the order for tional issues. He is the attorney who Although I disagree with a number of the quorum call be rescinded. really makes a difference in this coun- his interpretations of constitutional law, there is no doubt about the genius The PRESIDING OFFICER. (Mr. try and who makes the primary argu- and effectiveness of this man, and I BUNNING). Without objection, it is so ments before the Supreme Court of the think it is a tribute to him that he was ordered. United States of America. willing to stand up for Ted Olson and f In addition, he has a huge office with a lot of people working to make sure write it in a letter. Walter Dellinger is the former Clin- RECESS this country legally is on its toes. ton Solicitor General. He is one of the Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, on be- In the case of Ted Olson, I am very great lawyers of this country. He is a half of the majority leader, TRENT pleased that we are able to have this liberal and some thought he was ex- LOTT, I ask unanimous consent that motion up at this time. I am pleased tremely partisan, although I ques- the Senate stand in recess until the that we have colleagues with good tioned that personally, just like I ques- hour of 1 o’clock. faith on the other side who are willing tion those who say Ted Olson is par- There being no objection, at 12 noon, to see that this is brought to a vote tisan. No question that Walter the Senate recessed until 1:02 p.m., and today because we should not hold up Dellinger is a very strong and positive reassembled when called to order by the nomination for the Solicitor Gen- Democrat, a very aggressive Democrat. the Presiding Officer (Mr. BUNNING). eral of the United States of America. But he also is a man of great intel- The PRESIDING OFFICER. In my We have had all kinds of Solicitors General. We have had some who have ligence and integrity. capacity as a Senator from Kentucky, I On February 5, 2001, Mr. Dellinger been very partisan but have been great suggest the absence of a quorum. The said that when Olson served in the Jus- Solicitors General, and we have had clerk will call the roll. tice Department as the head of the Of- some who have hardly been partisan at The legislative clerk proceeded to fice of Legal Counsel, he ‘‘was viewed call the roll. all and have been weak Solicitors Gen- as someone who brought considerable Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I ask unan- eral. We have had some not very par- integrity to the decisionmaking.’’ imous consent that the order for the tisan at all who have been great Solici- Virtually everybody who worked quorum call be rescinded. tors General. You would have to make with Ted Olson at the Office of Legal The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without an analysis yourself to determine how Counsel—in fact, all that I know of— objection, it is so ordered. your own personal philosophy fits. said he was a man of integrity who f But in terms of some great ones, called them the way he saw them, who there was Archibald Cox, who was EXECUTIVE SESSION abided by the law and did not allow never known for conservative politics. partisan politics to enter into any Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I ask unan- He was not very partisan by most Re- thinking. There are two offices where imous consent that the Senate proceed publicans’ standards, but he turned out partisan politics could work to the det- in executive session. to be an excellent Solicitor General of riment of our country. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without the United States. We could go on and One is the Office of Legal Counsel, objection, it is so ordered. on. which he handled with distinction, f But let me just say this, that it is in- with ability, with fairness, in a non- teresting to me that Ted Olson has the NOMINATION OF THEODORE partisan way. The other is the Office of support of some of the leading attor- the Solicitor General, which I assert to BEVRY OLSON, TO BE SOLICITOR neys and law professors in this country GENERAL OF THE UNITED this body he will handle in the same who have the reputation of being ac- nonpartisan way. He will certainly try STATES—MOTION TO DISCHARGE tive Democrats. to do what is constitutionally sound Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, pursuant Let me just mention a few. And I and right. And he will represent the to the provisions of S. Res. 8, I now really respect these gentlemen for Congress of the United States in these move to discharge the Judiciary Com- being willing to come to bat for Ted battles. He may not always agree with mittee of the nomination of Ted Olson, Olson. Laurence Tribe, the attorney for the Congress of the United States when to be Solicitor General of the United former Vice President Gore, in Bush v. we are wrong, but you can at least States. Gore, on March 5, 2001, said: count on him doing what is right and The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under It surely cannot be that anyone who took trying to make the best analysis and the provisions of S. Res. 8, the motion that prevailing view— do what he should. is limited to 4 hours of debate, to be He is referring to Bush v. Gore— Now, Beth Nolan is a former Clinton equally divided between the two lead- and fought for it must on that account be op- White House counsel and Reagan De- ers. posed for the position of Solicitor General. partment of Justice, Office of Legal Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I note that Because Ted Olson briefed and argued his Counsel attorney. Beth is a consider- the chairman of the Judiciary Com- side of the case with intelligence, with in- able Democrat, and she is someone I re- sight, and with integrity, his advocacy on mittee, Senator HATCH, is here and spect. We have had our differences, but the occasion of the Florida election litiga- ready to proceed. Therefore, I yield the tion, as profoundly as I disagree with him on I have to say that she deserves respect. floor. the merits, counts for me as a plus in this In a September 25, 1987, letter signed The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- context, not as a minus. If we set Bush v. by other Department of Justice law- ator from Utah. Gore aside, what remains in Ted’s case is an yers she had this to say: VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:11 Dec 20, 2013 Jkt 081600 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 J:\ODA425\1997-2008-FILES-4-SS-PROJECT\2001-SENATE-REC-FILES\RECFILES-NEW\S mmaher on DSKCGSP4G1 with SOCIALSECURITY May 24, 2001 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S5579 We all hold Mr. Olson in a very high profes- want good government, people who Olson misled or was less than truthful sional and personal regard because we be- want the best of the best in these posi- to the committee anyway. Rather, lieve he made his decisions with integrity tions at the Justice Department, ought they show him to be forthright and after long and hard reflection.
Recommended publications
  • Theodore Olson, Conservative Stalwart, to Represent 'Dreamers' In

    Theodore Olson, Conservative Stalwart, to Represent 'Dreamers' In

    Theodore Olson, Conservative Stalwart, to Represent ‘Dreamers’ in Supreme Court By Adam Liptak • Sept. 26, 2019 o WASHINGTON — The young immigrants known as “Dreamers” have gained an unlikely ally in the Supreme Court. Theodore B. Olson, who argued for robust executive power in senior Justice Department posts under Republican presidents, will face off against lawyers from President Trump’s Justice Department in a case over Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a program that shields some 700,000 young undocumented immigrants from deportation and allows them to work. In an interview in his office, Mr. Olson said he had generally taken a broad view of presidential authority, particularly in the realm of immigration. “Executive power is important, and we respect it,” he said. “But it has to be done the right way. It has to be done in an orderly fashion so that citizens can understand what is being done and people whose lives have depended on a governmental policy aren’t swept away arbitrarily and capriciously. And that’s what’s happened here.” Mr. Olson has argued 63 cases in the Supreme Court, many of them as solicitor general under President George W. Bush. In private practice, he argued for the winning sides in Bush v. Gore, which handed the presidency to Mr. Bush, and Citizens United, which amplified the role of money in politics. But Mr. Olson disappointed some of his usual allies when he joined David Boies, his adversary in Bush v. Gore, to challenge California’s ban on same-sex marriage. That case reached the Supreme Court and helped pave the way for the court’s 2015 decision establishing a constitutional right to such unions.
  • Conflicts of Interest in Bush V. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K

    Conflicts of Interest in Bush V. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K

    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship Spring 2003 Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K. Neumann Jr. Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Richard K. Neumann Jr., Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally?, 16 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 375 (2003) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? RICHARD K. NEUMANN, JR.* On December 9, 2000, the United States Supreme Court stayed the presidential election litigation in the Florida courts and set oral argument for December 11.1 On the morning of December 12-one day after oral argument and half a day before the Supreme Court announced its decision in Bush v. Gore2-the Wall Street Journalpublished a front-page story that included the following: Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 76 years old, and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, 70, both lifelong Republicans, have at times privately talked about retiring and would prefer that a Republican appoint their successors.... Justice O'Connor, a cancer survivor, has privately let it be known that, after 20 years on the high court,'she wants to retire to her home state of Arizona ...
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty

    SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty

    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
  • Bibliography on World Conflict and Peace

    Bibliography on World Conflict and Peace

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 097 246 SO 007 806 AUTHOR Boulding, Elise; Passions, J. Robert TITLE Bibliography on World Conflict and Peace. INSTITUTION American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C.; Consortium on Peace Research, Education, and Development, Boulder, Colo. PUB DATE Aug 74 NOT? 82p. AVAILABLE FROMBibliography Project, c/o Dorothy Carson, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80302 ($2.50; make checks payable to Boulding Projects Fund) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 BC Not Available from !DRS. PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; *Conflict Resolution; Development; Disarmament; Environment; *Futures (of Society); *Global Approach; Instructional Materials; International Education; international Law; International Organizations; *Peace; Political Science; Social Action; Systems Approach; *World Affairs IDENTIFIERS *Nonviolence ABSTRACT This bibliography is compiled primarily in response to the needs of teachers and students in the new field of conflict and peace studies, defined as the analysis of the characteristics of the total world social system which make peace more probable. The introduction includes some suggestions on how to use the bibliography, sources of literature on war/peace studies, and a request to users for criticisms and suggestions. Books, monographs, research reports, journal articles, or educational materials were included when they were:(1) related to conflict management at every social level,(2) relevant to nonviolence, and (3) classic statements in an academic specialization, such as foreign policy studies when of particular significance for conflict studies. A subject guide to the main categories of the bibliography lists 18 major topics with various numbered subdivisions. Th%. main body of the bibliography lists citations by author and keys this to the topic subdivisions.
  • Teaching About Big Money in Elections: to Amend Or Not to Amend the U.S

    Teaching About Big Money in Elections: to Amend Or Not to Amend the U.S

    Social Education 76(5), pp 236–241 ©2012 National Council for the Social Studies Teaching about Big Money in Elections: To Amend or Not to Amend the U.S. Constitution? James M. M. Hartwick and Brett L. M. Levy “Politics has become so expensive that it takes a lot of money even to be defeated.” — Will Rogers (1879–1935) Last summer, California and Massachusetts became the sixth and seventh states— activity is independent of the candidates’ along with Hawaii, New Mexico, Vermont, Rhode Island, and Maryland—to send a campaigns. These cases led to the rise resolution to the U.S. Congress calling for a constitutional amendment to (1) end the of “superPACs.” As long as they do not court’s extension of personhood rights to corporations, and (2) enable the government coordinate with campaigns and do not to definitively regulate campaign finances. This fall, with the bipartisan support of contribute directly to the candidates, its Democratic governor and Republican lieutenant governor, Montana is asking superPACs can raise unlimited funds voters to consider a referendum advising Montana’s congressional delegation to sup- from corporations, non-profits, unions, port such a constitutional amendment. Meanwhile, the current Congress has already and individuals and may spend those considered more than a dozen resolutions to amend the Constitution to strengthen funds to promote their favored political Congress’s ability to limit corporate funding of election activities, and 20 states have candidate or cause. In addition, non-prof- introduced similar resolutions.1 its, like “social welfare” groups (501 [c][4] s), may engage in unlimited non-coordi- Political support is growing.
  • Hamdan V. Rumsfeld: Establishing a Constitutional Process

    Hamdan V. Rumsfeld: Establishing a Constitutional Process

    S. HRG. 109–1056 HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD: ESTABLISHING A CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 11, 2006 Serial No. J–109–95 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 43–111 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:01 Apr 27, 2009 Jkt 043111 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\43111.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:01 Apr 27, 2009 Jkt 043111 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\43111.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Feingold, Hon. Russell D., a U.S. Senator from the State of Wisconsin, pre- pared statement ..................................................................................................
  • The Other Side of Campus Indiana University’S Student Right and the Rise of National Conservatism

    The Other Side of Campus Indiana University’S Student Right and the Rise of National Conservatism

    The Other Side of Campus Indiana University’s Student Right and the Rise of National Conservatism JASON S. LANTZER n a brisk spring day in March 1965, an estimated 300 Indiana 0University students assembled in Dunn Meadow, the green oasis beside the Indiana Memorial Union where students often relaxed between classes or met to play games. This day was different, however, as these students gathered not to enjoy the atmosphere, but to speak their minds about the war in Vietnam. They carried signs, chanted slogans, and generally behaved, according to the campus newspaper, the Indiana Daily Student (IDS), in a manner not unlike that of an additional 650 students and locals who had also assembled in the meadow to hear speeches about the civil rights move- ment in the wake of the recent march on Selma, Alabama.‘ This convergence of civil rights and Vietnam demonstrations may sound like a typical episode of 1960s campus activism, but it was not. A good half of the students attending the Vietnam rally marched in support of the United States’ commitment to halting the advance of communism in Southeast Asia. While such a show of support was hardly uncommon, either at IU or at other college campuses nationwide, subsequent studies of 1960s Jason S. Lantzer is a visiting lecturer in history at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. For reading of and assistance with this essay, he extends his thanks to Prof. Nick Cullather, Chad Parker, and the IMH staff. ‘Indiana Daily Student, March 10, 11, 12, 13, 1965; hereafter cited as IDS INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY, 101 (June 2005) 0 2005, Trustees of Indiana University.
  • Trump's Conundrum for in Republicans

    Trump's Conundrum for in Republicans

    V21, 28 Thursday, March 24, 2016 Trump’s conundrum for IN Republicans Leaders say they will support the ‘nominee,’ while McIntosh raises down-ballot alarms By BRIAN A. HOWEY BLOOMINGTON – GOP presidential front runner Donald J. Trump is just days away from his Indiana political debut, and Hoosier Republicans are facing a multi-faceted conundrum. Do they join the cabal seeking to keep the nominating number of delegates away from him prior to the Republi- can National Convention in July? This coming as Trump impugns the wife of Sen. Ted Cruz, threatening to “spill the beans” on her after two weeks of cam- paign violence and nativist fear mongering representing a sharp departure dent Mitch Daniels, former secretary of state Condoleezza modern Indiana internationalism. Rice, former senator Tom Coburn or former Texas governor Do they participate in a united front seeking an Rick Perry? alternative such as Sen. Ted Cruz, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Or do they take the tack expressed by Gov. Mike or a dark horse consensus candidate such as Purdue Presi- Continued on page 3 Election year data By MORTON MARCUS INDIANAPOLIS – Let’s clarify some issues that may arise in this contentious political year. These data covering 2005 to 2015 may differ somewhat from those offered by other writers, speakers, and researchers. Why? These data are “This plan addresses our state’s from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ “Quarterly Census of immediate road funding needs Wages and Employment” via the while ensuring legislators come Indiana Department of Workforce Development’s Hoosiers by the back to the table next year ready Numbers website, where only the first three quarters of 2015 are to move forward on a long-term available.
  • Litigation Department of the Year Competition

    Litigation Department of the Year Competition

    americanlawyer.com JANUARY 2010 SPECIAL ISSUE THIS IS Our FIFTH BIEnnIAL Litigation Department of the Year competition. It has be- come a cliché to note that we’ve never had a tougher time picking finalists and winners from the scores of submissions. Nevertheless, it’s true. The last two years have been a time of unprec- edented upheaval for American businesses—and for the lawyers who serve them. To quote a part- ner from one of our finalist firms, the economic meltdown resulted not just in litigation, but in conflagration. The firms we chose in the overall contest and in the three practice area competi- tions—product liability, labor and employment, and intellectual property—didn’t just survive this trial by fire. They were forged into stronger, faster, smarter litigation departments. As before, we invited every firm in The Am Law 200 to report on litigation activities in a 19- month period, this time January 1, 2008–July 31, 2009. Every submission was read by at least three American Lawyer journalists. We vetted the strongest entries with calls to clients and op- posing counsel. Panels of reporters and editors picked finalists in each category and invited those firms to our offices in New York to plead their cases. At the end, we arrived at the results that follow: four winners, 12 runners-up, and 24 honorable mentions. Congratulations to all of them. —ALISON FRANKEL GIBSON DUNN Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Game Changers When other firms and conventional strategies come up short, By David Bario clients in deep trouble turn to Gibson Dunn for fresh, aggressive thinking and innovative rescues.
  • Supreme Court Inc

    Supreme Court Inc

    The New York Times March 16, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/magazine/16supreme- t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine&oref=slogin Supreme Court Inc. How the nation’s highest court became increasingly receptive to the arguments of American business. By JEFFREY ROSEN I. The headquarters of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, located across from Lafayette Park in Washington, is a limestone structure that looks almost as majestic as the Supreme Court. The similarity is no coincidence: both buildings were designed by the same architect, Cass Gilbert. Lately, however, the affinities between the court and the chamber, a lavishly financed business-advocacy organization, seem to be more than just architectural. The Supreme Court term that ended last June was, by all measures, exceptionally good for American business. The chamber’s litigation center filed briefs in 15 cases and its side won in 13 of them — the highest percentage of victories in the center’s 30-year history. The current term, which ends this summer, has also been shaping up nicely for business interests. I visited the chamber recently to talk with Robin Conrad, who heads the litigation effort, about her recent triumphs. Conrad, an appealing, soft-spoken woman, lives with her family on a horse farm in Maryland, where she rides with a fox-chasing club called the Howard County-Iron Bridge Hounds. Her office, playfully adorned by action figures of women like Xena the Warrior Princess and Hillary Rodham Clinton, has one of the most impressive views in Washington. “You can see the White House through the trees,” she said as we peered through a window overlooking the park.
  • US Mainstream Media Index May 2021.Pdf

    US Mainstream Media Index May 2021.Pdf

    Mainstream Media Top Investors/Donors/Owners Ownership Type Medium Reach # estimated monthly (ranked by audience size) for ranking purposes 1 Wikipedia Google was the biggest funder in 2020 Non Profit Digital Only In July 2020, there were 1,700,000,000 along with Wojcicki Foundation 5B visitors to Wikipedia. (YouTube) Foundation while the largest BBC reports, via donor to its endowment is Arcadia, a Wikipedia, that the site charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and had on average in 2020, Peter Baldwin. Other major donors 1.7 billion unique visitors include Google.org, Amazon, Musk every month. SimilarWeb Foundation, George Soros, Craig reports over 5B monthly Newmark, Facebook and the late Jim visits for April 2021. Pacha. Wikipedia spends $55M/year on salaries and programs with a total of $112M in expenses in 2020 while all content is user-generated (free). 2 FOX Rupert Murdoch has a controlling Publicly Traded TV/digital site 2.6M in Jan. 2021. 3.6 833,000,000 interest in News Corp. million households – Average weekday prime Rupert Murdoch Executive Chairman, time news audience in News Corp, son Lachlan K. Murdoch, Co- 2020. Website visits in Chairman, News Corp, Executive Dec. 2020: FOX 332M. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Fox Source: Adweek and Corporation, Executive Chairman, NOVA Press Gazette. However, Entertainment Group. Fox News is owned unique monthly views by the Fox Corporation, which is owned in are 113M in Dec. 2020. part by the Murdoch Family (39% share). It’s also important to point out that the same person with Fox News ownership, Rupert Murdoch, owns News Corp with the same 39% share, and News Corp owns the New York Post, HarperCollins, and the Wall Street Journal.
  • Obama, Gay, Blackmail -- Rezko, Fitzgerald, Blagojevich

    Obama, Gay, Blackmail -- Rezko, Fitzgerald, Blagojevich

    Obama, gay, blackmail -- Rezko, Fitzgerald, Blagojevich NewsFollowUp.com Obama CIA pictorial index search sitemap home .... OBAMA TOP 10 FRAUD .... Influence, Power News for the 99% Obama Groomed for 30 years by Ford Foundation ...................................Refresh F5...archive and Trilateral Commission and CIA to become home President 50th Anniversary of JFK assassination "Event of a Lifetime" at the Fess Parker Double Tree Inn. JFKSantaBarbara. NFU MOST ACTIVE PA Go to Alphabetic list Obama Gay, Chicago Academic Freedom Conference Bush Neocon Pedophile Index Obama Death List Rothschild Timeline Rothschild Research Sources Bush / Clinton Body Count Reagan, Clinton, Bush Crime Families DeLauro / Turtin, Obama body count Ban ki Moon, Sun Myung Moon = go to other NFU pages http://www.newsfollowup.com/influence_gen.htm[5/28/2014 3:07:19 PM] Obama, gay, blackmail -- Rezko, Fitzgerald, Blagojevich WayneMadsen Report has been told that Emanuel was aware of the damaging nature of the "thousands" of FBI intercepted phone calls to him and Obama and wanted to divert Fitzgerald and the FBI away from he and the president-elect to Blagojevich and Harris. Fitzgerald, known as the man who covered up key elements of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and saw to it that the legal ground was laid for a commutation of the prison sentence of Dick Cheney’s chief of staff Scooter Libby in the Bush administration’s cover-up of the outing by the media of CIA non-official cover agent Valerie Plame Wilson, decided to seek authorization for the early morning arrest of Blagojevich to protect Obama and Emanuel, as well as Bush.