DOCSLIB.ORG

The Scientific Classification of Wolves: <I>Canis Lupus Soupus</I>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Scientific Classification of Wolves: <I>Canis Lupus Soupus</I> University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for 2011 The cS ientific lC assification of Wolves: Canis lupus soupus L. David Mech USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Mech, L. David, "The cS ientific lC assification of Wolves: Canis lupus soupus" (2011). USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. 315. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc/315 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. arvey H luff artin C M Dean EthiopiAn wolf Arctic wolf allon F Jacquelyn Deb Wells MExicAn wolf GrAy wolf 4 Spring 2011 www.wolf.org ical characteristics. Thus some classifi- cation scientists (taxonomists) were “splitters” and others “lumpers.” Splitters tended to separate groups more finely, whereas lumpers tended to lump smaller groups into larger clus- ters. However, there was no objective basis for determining which approach might be correct or more informative. Scientists who classified wolves in North America were splitters. Old World scientists had pretty well recog- nized that there were 8 geograph- ically distinct races, or subspecies of wolves in Europe and Asia. However, North American scientists split New World wolves into 24 subspecies. This is how there came to be so many common names for North American wolves, for example, the eastern timber wolf, the arctic wolf, the Mexican wolf, the great plains wolf, etc. Scientifically, the subspecies or races have three parts ray wolf, timber wolf, red wolf, to their name (Example: Canis lupus eastern wolf, brush wolf, arctic baileyi, the Mexican wolf), but all the Gwolf, Mexican wolf, maned subspecies are of the same basic gray- wolf, Ethiopian wolf, etc., etc. How wolf species, C. lupus. many kinds of wolves are there? And However, wolves are great travelers. what are the differences? This is a Ear-tagged or radio-tagged wolves have really good question, and the answer is dispersed from the natal packs in getting more complicated all the time. the range of one subspecies across the Let us start by going back a few ranges of two or three other races. The years to the way science looked at current record is a wolf in Finland wolves more traditionally— before the that traveled a straight-line distance of by L. DAVID MECH days of the new field of molecular 655 miles, or 1,092 kilometers. This genetics. Molecular genetics examines potential to travel calls into question the actual DNA of animals and tries the existence of so many subspecies to classify them according to genetic with small ranges. similarities. Thus it made good biological sense Before the advent of molecular gen- when in 1995 the eminent canid etics, scientists classified wolves (and taxonomist, Ron Nowak, published other animals) based on their physical a reclassification of North American traits (morphology). With wolves, it wolves. He lumped the 24 origin- was primarily coat color and skull ally recognized subspecies of North measurements. These characteristics, American wolves into 5. In reality, of course, basically reflect the animal’s whether one recognizes 24, 5 or 3 genetics but only indirectly. North American races of wolves, a One major problem with this older wolf is a wolf is a wolf. Science has approach is that there is a certain not demonstrated any basic behavioral amount of judgment in assessing phys- differences among any of these races, International Wolf Spring 2011 5 nor has any scientist even proposed South America is not really a wolf; it dies, however, examine the actual DNA that such behavioral differences exist is still a member of the Canidae, or of animals and thus potentially reveal among wolf races. dog family, but it is not part of the wolf their true genetic relatedness. These So far I have only been discussing branch of that family, despite its genetic studies use chemicals to amplify the gray wolf, Canis lupus, which is common name. The Ethiopian wolf the DNA found in blood, hair, skin the most widespread wolf worldwide. (Canis simensis), on the other hand, or even intestinal cells that slough off The other type of North American wolf may actually be a wolf. Traditionally in feces. A special, high-tech machine that has traditionally been recognized scientists thought the animal was a then presents a sort of photo of parts of is the red wolf, Canis rufus, of the jackal (similar to a coyote), but recent the DNA that can be examined. southeastern United States. Scientists genetic study seems to indicate it is a Problems with the molecular-gene- still disagree about the true identity of wolf. Some scientists, however, still tics approach arise, however, from the red wolf. Some think the red wolf think it is a type of jackal. several sources. First the field is rela- is a cross between the gray wolf and So much for the less complex tively new and thus still being tested the coyote (Canis latrans—also called aspects of wolf taxonomy. The com- by the usual scientific processes like the “brush wolf” in some places). plications have arisen because of replication, competing interpretation Others have proposed that the red wolf the relatively new field of molecular and the continuing addition of new is just another race of gray wolf, while genetics. Molecular-genetic studies are information. In addition, the issue of still others believe the red wolf is a a powerful and valuable tool to add subjectivity or personal interpretation valid entity of its own. incisive information about the related- of the data is still a problem. Related- From a worldwide perspective, we ness of one group of wolves to others. ness itself is a matter of degree. Except must also consider both the maned Mere appearances can be deceiving for twins or other multiple individuals wolf and the Ethiopian wolf. The as the similarities between fish and arising from the same egg and sperm, maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) of whales attest. Molecular-genetics stu- every individual is genetically unique. Greg Koch artier C rEd wolf David coyotE 6 Spring 2011 www.wolf.org Every wolf pack is genetically distinct on a larger scale, and every wolf popu- lation is distinct on a still larger scale, Are the wolves with the two types etc. Thus where does one draw a line to group genetically similar entities as of dnA the same species? special enough to call them different? Furthermore, how much weight should be given to results of various genetic tests relative to physical traits such as skull measurements that have what if other genetics tests show a genetic basis but whose genetics have not been examined? For example, with they differ, but the animals show one genetic test, some 38 percent of 88 Minnesota wolves tested have a kind of DNA the same as, or similar to, no physical or behavioral differences that of coyotes. This particular type of DNA has nothing to do with any phys- and can freely interbreed? ical or behavioral trait. Wolves with this coyote-like DNA mate with those having wolf DNA and form packs like all the other wolves in the population. They look and act like all the other wolves. Are the wolves with the two types of DNA the same species? What if other genetics tests show they differ, skulls of red wolves can be distin- What does all this mean in terms but the animals show no physical or guished from those of eastern wolves of understanding basic wolf biology behavioral differences and can freely and of Minnesota wolves. and behavior? Actually not much. The interbreed? What if the two types also If this all seems confusing, that’s aphorism “a wolf is a wolf is a wolf” is inhabit different but overlapping areas? because it is. And adding to this con- highly appropriate in this regard to The last is precisely the case with a fusion is the fact that both the red wolf anyone except the taxonomist. proposed new species of wolf called and the eastern wolf can and do Regardless of what they are called or the eastern wolf (Canis lycaon). This hybridize with coyotes, but there’s no what differences the current genetic wolf lives from far southeastern Canada record of the gray wolf of western testing shows, wolves throughout the west to southwestern Ontario, northern Canada and Alaska interbreeding with world are pretty much the same in Minnesota and Manitoba and is coyotes. (The experiment has never basic appearance and behavior. The currently referred to as the “eastern been tried in captivity.) The much strong implication here is that when wolf.” In northern Minnesota and in larger size of the eastern coyote it comes to the great majority of the adjacent Ontario, those wolves live compared to all other coyotes is a wolf genome that codes for basic wolf closely and mate with wolves whose reflection of these interactions. Also appearance and behavior—the DNA DNA (on this particular test) is the the fact that the eastern wolf and the that has not been tested—gray wolves same as those in Alaska and northwest red wolf can hybridize with coyotes are essentially all the same.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rabies and Distemper Outbreaks in Smallest Ethiopian Wolf Population
    RESEARCH LETTERS Therefore, the new H7N9 viruses were highly pathogenic live-poultry markets in Guangdong, China. PLoS One. 2015; to chickens when compared with the early H7N9 virus and 10:e0126335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126335 4. Shi J, Deng G, Liu P, Zhou J, Guan L, Li W, et al. Isolation and could transmit among chickens by contact. characterization of H7N9 viruses from live poultry markets— The biological features of H7N9 virus and its pandemic implication of the source of current H7N9 infection in humans. potential have caused global concern (8). The early H7N9 vi- Chin Sci Bull. 2013;58:1857–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/ ruses lacked the basic HA cleavage site, exhibited low patho- s11434-013-5873-4 5. Ramos I, Krammer F, Hai R, Aguilera D, Bernal-Rubio D, genicity, and caused mild or no disease in poultry (9). The Steel J, et al. H7N9 influenza viruses interact preferentially with α2,3- cleavage site in HA protein of the isolates we analyzed were linked sialic acids and bind weakly to α2,6-linked sialic acids. J Gen KGKRTAR¯G or KRKRTAR¯G. They had high pathoge- Virol. 2013;94:2417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.056184-0 nicity and replication in chickens and could transmit among 6. Li Z, Chen H, Jiao P, Deng G, Tian G, Li Y, et al. Molecular basis of replication of duck H5N1 influenza viruses in a chickens by contact. Therefore, these new H7N9 viruses could mammalian mouse model. J Virol. 2005;79:12058–64.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican Wolf Is the Same, with the Regular Scrub, Although the Higher Elevations Are Hierarchy from the Alpha Breeding Pair to the Forested with Spruce and Fir
    Life and behaviour of wolves: Sandra Benson - Deputy Senior Wolf Handler (UKWCT) Historial Range Pack Size It was originally found in the foothills and The Mexican grey wolf lives in small packs mountainous areas of central and north usually consisting of a breeding pair and their Mexico (3,000 - 12,000 feet), the Sonora and offspring from the previous year. The pack Chihuahua deserts, and into South East size is smaller than most northern grey Arizona, South New Mexico and South West wolves as the prey is smaller in size. The Texas. This area is mostly dry, chaparral adults usually mate for life and breeding takes place once a year between January and March, with a gestation period of 63 - 65 days, resulting in an average of four to six cubs which are born underground. They are born deaf, blind and defenceless. Social Life All wolves are social creatures and the Mexican wolf is the same, with the regular scrub, although the higher elevations are hierarchy from the alpha breeding pair to the forested with spruce and fir. The Mexican omega at the bottom of the pack. Packs wolf will cross these desert areas but not live rarely encounter each other because of their in them. intricate boundaries formed through scent marking and communication through Physical Characteristics howling. The pack hunts together and helps Adult Mexican wolves range in weight from raise the young. Photo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 65 - 85 lbs (27 - 37 kilos), are approximately Downward turn of the Mexican Wolf 4.5 - 5.5 feet from nose tip to end of the tail, The Mexican wolf or lobo as it and on average are 28 - 32 inches to shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolves in the Lower 48 States
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION FOR A NATIONAL RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE WOLF (CANIS LUPUS) IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES OUTSIDE THE SOUTHWEST UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Center for Biological Diversity Photo: Gary Kramer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2 July 20, 2010 Ken Salazar, Secretary Rowan Gould, Acting Director Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Main Interior Building 1849 C Street NW 18th and C Streets, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 Washington, D.C. 20240 Re: Petition to the U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, for Development of a Recovery Plan for the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Conterminous United States Outside of the Southwest. Dear Secretary Salazar and Acting Director Gould: Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(f) of the Endangered Species Act and section 5 U.S.C. § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, the Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) hereby petitions the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”), by and through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”), to develop a recovery plan for the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the conterminous United States outside of the Southwest. Our petition excludes the Southwest on the premise that the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) will be listed either as a subspecies or distinct population segment, as requested in the Center’s Mexican gray wolf listing petition of August 11, 2009. Should this not have occurred by the time the Service initiates development of a recovery plan for the wolf in the conterminous U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpse of an African… Wolf? Cécile Bloch
    $6.95 Glimpse of an African… Wolf ? PAGE 4 Saving the Red Wolf Through Partnerships PAGE 9 Are Gray Wolves Still Endangered? PAGE 14 Make Your Home Howl Members Save 10% Order today at shop.wolf.org or call 1-800-ELY-WOLF Your purchases help support the mission of the International Wolf Center. VOLUME 25, NO. 1 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER SPRING 2015 4 Cécile Bloch 9 Jeremy Hooper 14 Don Gossett In the Long Shadow of The Red Wolf Species Survival Are Gray Wolves Still the Pyramids and Beyond: Plan: Saving the Red Wolf Endangered? Glimpse of an African…Wolf? Through Partnerships In December a federal judge ruled Geneticists have found that some In 1967 the number of red wolves that protections be reinstated for of Africa’s golden jackals are was rapidly declining, forcing those gray wolves in the Great Lakes members of the gray wolf lineage. remaining to breed with the more wolf population area, reversing Biologists are now asking: how abundant coyote or not to breed at all. the USFWS’s 2011 delisting many golden jackals across Africa The rate of hybridization between the decision that allowed states to are a subspecies known as the two species left little time to prevent manage wolves and implement African wolf? Are Africa’s golden red wolf genes from being completely harvest programs for recreational jackals, in fact, wolves? absorbed into the expanding coyote purposes. If biological security is population. The Red Wolf Recovery by Cheryl Lyn Dybas apparently not enough rationale for Program, working with many other conservation of the species, then the organizations, has created awareness challenge arises to properly express and laid a foundation for the future to the ecological value of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • EWCP Annual Report April 2017.Pdf
    April 2017 Annual Report Prepared by Jorgelina Marino, Eric Bedin Claudio Sillero-Zubiri and EWCP Team ©ThierryGrobet ewcp annual report | 1 Contents p3, Executive Summary p4, A letter from our Founder & Director p5, Invited Contribution p6, Monitoring wolves and threats p15, Disease control and prevention p18, Habitat protection p20, Outreach and education p24, Research and capacity building p27, News p29, Project Administration p30, Our donors p32, The EWCP Team p34, Why Choose EWCP p34, Contact Us Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme Our Vision Our vision is to secure Ethiopian wolf populations and habitats across their present distribution, and to extend the species range, stressing its role as a flagship for the conservation of the Afroalpine ecosystem on which present and future generations of Ethiopians also depend. ewcp annual report | 2 Executive Summary 2016 was marked by widespread unrest in Ethiopia affecting several EWCP sites, culminating with the declaration of a state of emergency in September. In spite of the many logistic and administrative complications that ensued, most of our activities were implemented in full and with positive results. Thanks to the hard work of our Wolf Monitors we can report that wolves in Bale Mountains are on their way to recovery from recent rabies and distemper epizootics, with a 30% growth. Many pups were born, and we are confident this will translate to successful recruitment into the population. Our monitoring teams continue to expand, with more Wolf Monitors and Wolf Ambassadors recruited across the Ethiopian highlands. To ensure that threats to wolves are detected and reported efficiently, we are providing training to staff in the Arsi, South Wollo and Simien mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • I. G E O G RAP H IC PA T T E RNS in DIV E RS IT Y a . D Iversity And
    I. GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN DIVERSITY A. Diversity and Endemicty B. Patterns in Mammalian Richness 1 – latitude 2 – area 3 – isolation 4 – elevation C. Hotspots of Mammalian Biodiversity 1 – relevance 2 – optimal characteristics of hotspots 3 – empirical patterns for mammals II. CONSERVATION STATUS OF MAMMALS A. Prehistoric Extinctions B. Historic Extinctions 1 – summary (totals) 2 – taxonomic, morphologic bias 3 – Geographic bias C. Geography of Extinctions 1 – prehistory and human colonization 2 – geographic questions 3 – range collapse in mammals Hotspots of Mammalian Endemicity Endemic Mammals Species Richness (fig. 1) Schipper et al 2009 – Science 322:226. (color pdf distributed to lab sections) Fig. 2. Global patterns of threat, for land (brown) and marine (blue) mammals. (A) Number of globally threatened species (Vulnerable, Endangered or Critically Fig. 4. Global patterns of knowledge, for land Endangered). Number of species affected by: (B) habitat loss; (C) harvesting; (D) (terrestrial and freshwater, brown) and marine (blue) accidental mortality; and (E) pollution. Same color scale employed in (B), (C), (D) species. (A) Number of species newly described since and (E) (hence, directly comparable). 1992. (B) Data-Deficient species. Mammal Extinctions 1500 to 2000 (151 species or subspecies; ~ 83 species) COMMON NAME LATIN NAME DATE RANGE PRIMARY CAUSE Lesser Hispanolan Ground Sloth Acratocnus comes 1550 Hispanola introduction of rats and pigs Greater Puerto Rican Ground Sloth Acratocnus major 1500 Puerto Rico introduction of rats
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the Mexican Gray Wolf and the Red Wolf
    RESTORING THE WOLVES U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE MEXICAN GRAY WOLF AND DOGS, SERVICE RESPONDS TO AND THE RED WOLF, page 10 HYDATID TAPEWORM DEBATE, page 4 page 20 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER VOLUME 20, NO. 3 FALL 2010 Features Departments The Mexican gray 3 From the 4 wolf and red wolf Executive Director still struggle for survival 13 Tracking the Pack The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Bud Fazio, coordinator of the Mexican Gray Wolf Recovery Program, and Dr. David Rabon, coordinator of the Red Wolf Recovery 16 Personal Encounter Program, detail whether plans to restore these wolves are working. 18 Wolf Tracks by Cornelia Hutt Mexican Wolf Interagency Field Team Mexican Wolf 22 Members Matter Practical advice on how to 10 protect dogs from wolf attacks 24 A Look Beyond Jess Edberg, information services director for the International Wolf Center, describes why wolves attack dogs and which breeds are most On the Cover susceptible to attack. Photo by Bernard Marschner. by Jess Edberg Wolf looking for snowshoe hares in the willow thickets of the Plains of Murie in Denali National Park, Alaska. You can view more of Marschner’s images Scott Austin on his flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/ photos/70363861@N00/ Dotty Weber Did you know... one easy way for you to help us conserve natural resources is to make sure we have your email address. Simply email your address to: [email protected] Center Celebrates 25th Anniversary he International Wolf Center Wolf Curator Lori Schmidt helped Tkicked off its 25th year of an audience curious to learn more teaching the world about wolves about a common prey animal for June 18–20.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Cascade Wolf Survive? Robert Pisano
    Does the Cascade Wolf Survive? Robert Pisano The Cascade wolf Cants lupus fuse us is extinct in the USA. But it may survive in Canada, in the coastal forests of British Columbia, the northernmost part of its original range. But British Columbia gives this highly endangered subspecies no special protection. Over-hunting and hybridisation with neighbouring wolf subspecies and domestic dogs are the chief threats. The author reviews wolf management in coastal British Columbia and suggests changes that would improve the Cascade wolfs prospects, including complete protection of all wolves on wilderness islands where it may survive. The grey or timber wolf Canis lupus, ranged over most of North America virtually undisturbed until the European settlers arrived.1 To them, it was a competitor for game and a marauder of domestic stock, and numbers declined dramatically;^ habitat too was inevitably destroyed. As a result 15 of the 27 currently recognised subspecies of North American gray and red wolves are either extinct or highly endangered. Gray wolves are the largest wild canid. In size, weight, pelage and colour they vary considerably among, and often within, subspecies, but generally adult males are between 5 and 6.5 feet from the front of the snout to the tip of the tail, weigh between 45 and 175 pounds, and are grizzled grey with a range from black to nearly pure white. Today four grey wolf subspecies are protected as distinct races: the northern Rocky Mountain wolf C.I. irremotus, the Vancouver Island wolf C.I. crassodon, the Mexican wolf C.I. baileyi and, within its US range only, the eastern timber wolf C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanjay R Singhal, Ra
    SANJAY R SINGHAL, RA ENCOUNTER REPORT AUTUMN 1990 THE WOLF AT THE DOOR ADDENDUM There are several possible explanations to describe what I saw; all are feasible; all are…fantastic. It has been suggested that I encountered, in fact, a DM; 1 I cannot now confirm this. I have no corresponding evidence; I did not take any photographs, nor did I attempt to look for footprints, hairs or other physicals. In 1990, I had never heard of such a creature (nor would I, until the early months of 2012); 2 if anything, I would have thought it a loup-garou, or werewolf. 3 There are numerous accounts of the loup-garou, or werewolf, in Indiana, beginning with reports from the 19th century in Vincennes (Knox County), in the southwest portion of the state. 4 Additional encounters with a strange, wolf or dog-like creature, walking upright on its hind legs, were reported in 2006 in Vernon 5 (Jennings County) and in 2013, in New Salisbury 6 (Harrison County). It is not possible, based upon these reports, to determine what, if anything, these creatures were; nonetheless, their appearance and behaviour are quite similar to my own experience. If I were to base my summation upon these reports alone, I should suggest either a DM or a loup-garou…and still, it seems almost too improbable…and too fantastic. Another suggestion, somewhat based on historical legends, is the Waheela,7 a large, wolf-like cryptid with snow-white fur, reported in Alaska and Canada; a similar creature has been reported in northern Michigan.8 It is reasonable to suggest that I was visited by a white-furred Great Plains Wolf (Canis lupus nubilus);9 this subspecies of Grey Wolf (Canis lupus) is one of the most numerous in North America, and their colouring is typically lighter than other wolves.10 However, the US Fish & Wildlife Service does not list any wolf populations in Indiana; the nearest documented populations are in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, and in Wisconsin as of August 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Breeding and the Reintroduction
    Molecular Ecology (2008) 17, 344–350 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03400.x CaptiveBlackwell Publishing Ltd breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves P. W. HEDRICK and R. J. FREDRICKSON School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281-4501, USA Abstract Mexican and red wolves were both faced with extinction in the wild until captive popula- tions were established more than two decades ago. These captive populations have been successfully managed genetically to minimize mean kinship and retain genetic variation. Descendants of these animals were subsequently used to start reintroduced populations, which now number about 40–50 Mexican wolves in Arizona and New Mexico and about 100 red wolves in North Carolina. The original captive Mexican wolf population was descended from three founders. Merging this lineage with two other captive lineages, each with two founders, has been successfully carried out in the captive population and is in progress in the reintroduced population. This effort has resulted in increased fitness of cross-lineage wolves, or genetic rescue, in both the captive and reintroduced populations. A number of coyote-red wolf hybrid litters were observed in the late 1990s in the reintroduced red wolf population. Intensive identification and management efforts appear to have resulted in the elimination of this threat. However, population reintroductions of both Mexican and red wolves appear to have reached numbers well below the generally recommended number for recovery and there is no current effort to re-establish other populations. Keywords: ancestry, Canis lupus baileyi, Canis rufus, genetic rescue, hybridization, inbreeding depression Received 4 February 2007; revision accepted 20 April 2007 were captured to start the captive populations for both Introduction Mexican and red wolves about the same time because Captive breeding programs have been established for a of their imminent extinction in the wild (Hedrick et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Wolf Management Plan
    UTAH WOLF MANAGEMENT PLAN Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Publication #: 05-17 Prepared by: The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources & The Utah Wolf Working Group UTAH WOLF MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................... i List of Figures ......................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ................................................................................ iii Dedication ............................................................................................... iv Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Part I. Gray Wolf Ecology and Natural History .................................... 4 Description ............................................................................................... 4 Distribution ............................................................................................... 4 Sign .......................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomy ................................................................................................ 5 Reproduction ............................................................................................ 6 Mortality .................................................................................................... 6 Social Ecology .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]