DOCSLIB.ORG

Tiger Orangutan Grizzly Bear the Blue Iguana Ethiopian Wolf Great

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tiger Orangutan Grizzly Bear the Blue Iguana Ethiopian Wolf Great 10 centrespread centrespread 11 AUGUST 02-08, 2020 TIGER AUGUST 02-08, 2020 IN 1900, THERE WERE ABOUT 100,000 TIGERS IN THE WILD, MOST OF THEM IN INDIA WHAT HAPPENED? WHY? CONSERVATION In the early 1970s, its Because of rampant EFFORTS numbers dropped below poaching and shrinking India launched Project 500 worldwide habitat Tiger in 1973 RESULT ORANGUTAN Tiger population increased at the rate of 6% per THE GREAT APES, NATIVE TO INDONESIA AND annum from 2006 to 2018 in India. From 9 tiger MALAYSIA, ARE FOUND IN THE RAINFORESTS reserves spread across 9,000 sq km in 1973, there OF BORNEO AND SUMATRA are 50 reserves spread across 40,000 sq km now. From 268 in 1973, India now has 2,967 tigers WHAT HAPPENED? About 100 years ago, a quarter million of them were in the wild. In 2000, the population declined to less than 75,000 RODRIGUES WHY? FRUIT BAT Orangutans have been pushed to the brink due to palm oil plantation, which is wiping out swathes of ALSO CALLED THE FLYING FOX, IT IS NATIVE TO MAURITIUS; NOW rainforests in Indonesia and Malaysia FOUND ONLY ON RODRIGUES ISLAND CONSERVATION EFFORTS WHAT HAPPENED? WHY? CONSERVATION EFFORTS Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation, Indonesia’s From an estimated 1,000 Due to hunting Rodrigues Environmental Education Program, the Sebangua National Park, Chester Zoo, UK, and others are in 1955, fruit bat numbers and shrinking Mauritius Wildlife Foundation and others have led trying to create sustainable palm plantations and protect shrunk to 70-100 in 1979 habitat efforts to bring the numbers to sustainable levels rainforests across Southeast Asia to prevent the extinction of the orangutan RESULT RESULT Now there are 25,000 bats in the wild on Rodrigues Island. At least 16 zoos in the US have 180 bats in captivity Orangutan population has been steadily increasing and the Sumataran Orangutan population doubled from around 7,000 in 2003 to 14,000 in 2015 GRIZZLY BEAR SURVIVAL OF THE SPECIES THEY LIVE IN NORTH AMERICA Sustained conservation efforts and awareness campaigns have paid big dividends for the tiger whose population WHAT HAPPENED? There were more than rose from 268 in 1973, when Project Tiger was launched, to 1,468 in 2013 to 2,967 now, as the government announced 50,000 grizzlies in the 1800s. The numbers fell to this week. Here’s a look at some successful conservation projects around the world: 600-800 by 1960s :: Shelley Singh WHY? Because of human activities like habitat ETHIOPIAN GREAT BAMBOO LEMUR expansion, building of roads and hunting WOLF THE LARGEST BAMBOO LEMURS ARE FOUND IN ISOLATED THE BLUE ALSO KNOWN AS THE SIMIEN POCKETS OF MADAGASCAR’S EASTERN RAINFOREST CONSERVATION EFFORTS JACKAL OR SIMIEN FOX, IT IS WHAT HAPPENED? WHY? CONSERVATION EFFORTS IGUANA Protected under the US NATIVE TO THE ETHIOPIAN Once thought to Destruction of Led by local communities and THESE BLUE LIZARDS USED TO BE Endangered Species Act, HIGHLANDS be extinct, a small bamboo, its British charity, the Aspinall its conservation efforts ABUNDANT IN CAYMAN ISLANDS population was favourite food, Foundation, work on lemur were led by federal and WHAT HAPPENED? found in 1986 and habitat conservation began in 2005 WHAT HAPPENED? By 2010, there were just a couple of local agencies Its numbers declined sharply to just hundred of them RESULT a dozen in 1990 Its numbers grew from less than 60 in 2007 to 150 in 2018, but the RESULT WHY? great bamboo lemur fights a tough battle for survival 30 years of collabora- WHY? Habitat destruction, rabies and tive effort by federal Largely due to human activity conflict with humans and state agencies have and reduction in natural habitat helped increase its pop- CONSERVATION EFFORTS WEST INDIAN MANATEE ulation. Grizzlies now CONSERVATION EFFORTS Ethiopian Wolf Conservation occupy over 22,500 The Blue Iguana Conservation, run by Programme and other agencies MANATEES OR SEA COWS ARE FOUND LARGELY IN THE WATERS square miles of the Yel- National Trust for Cayman Islands and started work on OFF THE COAST OF FLORIDA AND CARIBBEAN ISLANDS lowstone ecosystem. supported by multiple global organisations, protecting the species about a There were about 1,500 including the Durrell Wildlife Conservation decade back. Efforts included WHAT HAPPENED? WHY? CONSERVATION EFFORTS of them in 2018 Trust, started work in 1990 creating awareness among locals, In 1967, only a few hundred of them Because of loss of warm USFWS, Save the Manatee Club preserving the wolf’s natural were left in Florida waters. They were water springs and sea grass and other agencies and NGOs RESULT habitat and vaccinating dogs listed as endangered by the US Fish beds due to pollution; have worked towards improving In 2001, there were just 30 blue iguanas in the and Wildlife Service (USFWS) collision with motor boats manatee’s numbers wild. In 2018, the 1,000th iguana was released RESULT into the wild. In 2015, the species moved from Today, there are more than 500 of RESULT Sources: nationaltrust.org; speciesconservation.org; wildnet.org; critically endangered to endangered list these endangered wolfs in the wild In 2017 their status changed from “endangered” to “threatened”. Now they number around 6,300 in Florida and 13,000 worldwide the guardian.com; batcon.org; livescience.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rabies and Distemper Outbreaks in Smallest Ethiopian Wolf Population
    RESEARCH LETTERS Therefore, the new H7N9 viruses were highly pathogenic live-poultry markets in Guangdong, China. PLoS One. 2015; to chickens when compared with the early H7N9 virus and 10:e0126335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126335 4. Shi J, Deng G, Liu P, Zhou J, Guan L, Li W, et al. Isolation and could transmit among chickens by contact. characterization of H7N9 viruses from live poultry markets— The biological features of H7N9 virus and its pandemic implication of the source of current H7N9 infection in humans. potential have caused global concern (8). The early H7N9 vi- Chin Sci Bull. 2013;58:1857–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/ ruses lacked the basic HA cleavage site, exhibited low patho- s11434-013-5873-4 5. Ramos I, Krammer F, Hai R, Aguilera D, Bernal-Rubio D, genicity, and caused mild or no disease in poultry (9). The Steel J, et al. H7N9 influenza viruses interact preferentially with α2,3- cleavage site in HA protein of the isolates we analyzed were linked sialic acids and bind weakly to α2,6-linked sialic acids. J Gen KGKRTAR¯G or KRKRTAR¯G. They had high pathoge- Virol. 2013;94:2417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.056184-0 nicity and replication in chickens and could transmit among 6. Li Z, Chen H, Jiao P, Deng G, Tian G, Li Y, et al. Molecular basis of replication of duck H5N1 influenza viruses in a chickens by contact. Therefore, these new H7N9 viruses could mammalian mouse model. J Virol. 2005;79:12058–64.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • EWCP Annual Report April 2017.Pdf
    April 2017 Annual Report Prepared by Jorgelina Marino, Eric Bedin Claudio Sillero-Zubiri and EWCP Team ©ThierryGrobet ewcp annual report | 1 Contents p3, Executive Summary p4, A letter from our Founder & Director p5, Invited Contribution p6, Monitoring wolves and threats p15, Disease control and prevention p18, Habitat protection p20, Outreach and education p24, Research and capacity building p27, News p29, Project Administration p30, Our donors p32, The EWCP Team p34, Why Choose EWCP p34, Contact Us Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme Our Vision Our vision is to secure Ethiopian wolf populations and habitats across their present distribution, and to extend the species range, stressing its role as a flagship for the conservation of the Afroalpine ecosystem on which present and future generations of Ethiopians also depend. ewcp annual report | 2 Executive Summary 2016 was marked by widespread unrest in Ethiopia affecting several EWCP sites, culminating with the declaration of a state of emergency in September. In spite of the many logistic and administrative complications that ensued, most of our activities were implemented in full and with positive results. Thanks to the hard work of our Wolf Monitors we can report that wolves in Bale Mountains are on their way to recovery from recent rabies and distemper epizootics, with a 30% growth. Many pups were born, and we are confident this will translate to successful recruitment into the population. Our monitoring teams continue to expand, with more Wolf Monitors and Wolf Ambassadors recruited across the Ethiopian highlands. To ensure that threats to wolves are detected and reported efficiently, we are providing training to staff in the Arsi, South Wollo and Simien mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 407/2009 Amending Council Regulation (EC)
    19.5.2009 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 123/3 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 407/2009 of 14 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Bolitoglossa dofleini, Cynops ensicauda, Echinotriton andersoni, Pachytriton labiatus, Paramesotriton spp., Sala­ mandra algira and Tylototriton spp. – which are currently not listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European are being imported into the Community in such numbers Community, as to warrant monitoring. Those species should therefore be included in Annex D to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 338/97. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein ( 1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof, (5) At the 14th Conference of the Parties to CITES in June 2007 new nomenclatural references for animals were adopted. Some inconsistencies between the CITES Appendices and the scientific names in those nomen­ clatural references as regards the species Asarcornis Whereas: scutulata and Pezoporus occidentalis, the families Rheobatra­ chidae and Phasianidae as well as the order Scandentia were discovered. Since those inconsistencies also appear in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 338/97, it should be (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species adapted accordingly. in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the CITES Convention’.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Behaviour & Ecology
    Ethiopian wolf and EWCP-authored papers, grouped by topic Overview Sillero-Zubiri, C. and J. Marino, Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis), in Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs. Status survey and conservation action plan, C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffmann, and D.W. Macdonald, Editors. 2004, IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group: Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. p. 167-174. Sillero-Zubiri, C., M. Hoffmann, and D.W. Macdonald, Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals, and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan. 2004: IUCN Gland, Switzerland. Sillero-Zubiri, C. and D. Gottelli, Canis simensis. Mammalian Species, 1994(485): p. 1-6. Gottelli, D. and C. Sillero-Zubiri, The Ethiopian wolf - an endangered endemic canid. Oryx, 1992. 26: p. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300023735 Behaviour & ecology Werhahn, G., et al., Himalayan wolf foraging ecology and the importance of wild prey. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019. 20: p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00780 Macdonald, D.W., et al., Monogamy: Cause, Consequence, or Corollary of Success in Wild Canids? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2019. 7: p. 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00341 Gutema, T.M., et al., Foraging ecology of African wolves (Canis lupaster) and its implications for the conservation of Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis). R Soc Open Sci, 2019. 6(9): p. 190772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190772 Kaszta, Ż., et al., Where buffalo and cattle meet: modelling interspecific contact risk using cumulative resistant kernels. Ecography, 2018. 41(10): p. 1616-1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03039 Hrouzkova, E., et al., Seismic communication in spalacids: signals in the giant root-rat and Gansu zokor.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Human-Livestock Predators Con Ict in Central And
    An Assessment of Human-Livestock Predators Conict in Central and Eastern Part of Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia Israel Sebsibe Tafesse ( [email protected] ) Salale University Research article Keywords: Bale Mountains National Park, predators, livestock predation Posted Date: December 15th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-126640/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/18 Abstract Background: sharing of space by humans and wildlife at a time may ignite clear conict. Populations of many species are declined due to the degradation of wildlife habitats caused by agricultural activities. Additionally, livestock may compete with wild herbivores for grazing and reduce the abundance of wild prey for carnivores. A reduction in populations of prey species of large predators might cause carnivores to be attracted towards livestock, ultimately provoke and aggravating the human-carnivores conict. This study investigated the current status of human-predators conict in and around the Bale Mountains National Park. Results: most (72.75%) respondents agreed on the presence of livestock predation. Major reported predators were spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), olive baboon (Papio anubis), African wolf (Canis lupaster), aardvark (Orycteropus afer), genet (Genetta genetta), Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis), lion (Panthera leo), and leopard (Panthera pardus). Cattle (54.19%), sheep (70.96%), goat (32.0%), donkey (37.72%) and horse (27.54%) were mentioned as major target of predators. Within the past ten years 1623 sheep, 741 cattle, 639 goats, 193 donkeys, and 124 horses were predated. This study found an increasing trend of livestock predation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Classification of Wolves: <I>Canis Lupus Soupus</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for 2011 The cS ientific lC assification of Wolves: Canis lupus soupus L. David Mech USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Mech, L. David, "The cS ientific lC assification of Wolves: Canis lupus soupus" (2011). USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. 315. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc/315 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. arvey H luff artin C M Dean EthiopiAn wolf Arctic wolf allon F Jacquelyn Deb Wells MExicAn wolf GrAy wolf 4 Spring 2011 www.wolf.org ical characteristics. Thus some classifi- cation scientists (taxonomists) were “splitters” and others “lumpers.” Splitters tended to separate groups more finely, whereas lumpers tended to lump smaller groups into larger clus- ters. However, there was no objective basis for determining which approach might be correct or more informative. Scientists who classified wolves in North America were splitters. Old World scientists had pretty well recog- nized that there were 8 geograph- ically distinct races, or subspecies of wolves in Europe and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • And Its Implication for Ethiopian Wolf (Canis Simensis )
    Behavioral ecology of the African wolf (Canis lupaster) and its implication for Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis ) conservation in the Ethiopian Highlands Tariku Mekonnen Gutema Dissertation presented for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) 2020 Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis Department of Biosciences Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Oslo © Tariku Mekonnen Gutema, 2020 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo No. 2298 ISSN 1501-7710 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Hanne Baadsgaard Utigard. Print production: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo. Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank almighty God for giving me health, strength and courage to complete this thesis. This work would not have been possible without the advice and support of many people. Firstly, I would like to acknowledge my principal supervisor Prof. Nils Chr. Stenseth, University of Oslo, for accepting me as a PhD student and for his continued advice, encouragement and unlimited support during the study. He offered me a full academic freedom and flexibility besides of his scientific guidance. I am very grateful to my three co-advisors, Prof Afework Bekele and Dr. Anagaw Atikem, Addis Ababa University, and Prof Claudio Sillero-Zubiri, University of Oxford, for their advice, comments and guidance throughout the study period. I would like to thank Dr. Anagaw Atickem for introducing me to the importance of the study of the recently discovered African wolf ecology and for his support from designing of the study to the write up of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Ecology of the Ethiopian Wolf, Canis Simensis
    Spatial ecology of the Ethiopian wolf, Canis simensis A thesis submitted for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jorgelina Marino Linacre College, University of Oxford Michaelmas Term, 2003 To my father, from whom I learnt to observe nature, and to Claudio, who introduced me to Bale and the wolves. II Jorgelina Marino Doctor of Philosophy Linacre College Michaelmas Term 2003 Spatial ecology of the Ethiopian wolf, Canis simensis A BSTRACT Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis) have developed a refined specialization to prey upon the rich rodent fauna of the Afroalpine ecosystem, a once widespread habitat persisting in mountain relicts. I applied a multi-level approach to investigate ways in which wolves respond to their environments at various scales of Afroalpine patchiness and heterogeneity. I focused on Afroalpine rodents as the critical resource and on the ecological constraints in their use at various scales, interpreting ecological patterns in terms of wolf behaviour and life-history traits. Extensive field surveys showed that high habitat specificity and a specialized diet confine wolves at present to Afroalpine islands at the top of the highest mountains, mostly limited on the lower end by the extent of subsistence agriculture. While wolves persist in almost every Afroalpine range in Ethiopia, habitat loss has resulted in local extinctions in two small Afroalpine patches and all seven extant populations are small (ranging from 10 to 250 wolves) and virtually isolated from each other. The Ethiopian wolf’s specialization seems to have appeared early in the short evolutionary history of the species. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography showed strong links between the genetic structuring of populations and the dynamical biogeography of Afroalpine ecosystems during the late glacial-interglacial period.
    [Show full text]
  • (Cuon Alpinus) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 21, Number 1, January 2020 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 345-354 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210142 Abundance, prey, and activity period of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand NORASET KHOEWSREE1, KHWANRUTAI CHARASPET1, RONGLARP SUKMASUANG1,♥, NUCHARIN SONGSASEN2, MANANYA PLA-ARD1, JIDAPA THONGBANTUM1, WARAPORN KONGCHALOEM1, KHANCHIT SRINOPAWAN3 1 Forest Biology Department, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak District, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. email: [email protected]. 2 Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute. 3001 Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC 20008, USA 3Khao Yai National Park. Pakchong District, Nakorn Ratchasima Province 30450, Thailand Manuscript received: 18 November 2019. Revision accepted: 29 December 2019. Abstract. Khoewsree N, Charaspet K, Sukmasuang R, Songsasen N, Pla-ard M, Thongbantum J, Kongchaloem W, Srinopawan K. 2020. Abundance, prey, and activity period of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Biodiversitas 21: 345-354. The abundance and occupancy of dholes in Khao Yai National Park are the highest among found carnivorous mammals. This demonstrates the importance of the home range of dholes. From the scat analysis, eight species of mammals that are prey can be identified. The dholes mainly consume ungulates when considering the most percentage of relative biomass consumed were ungulate species. For the number of prey animals consumed by dholes per year, a dhole consumes 25.94 prey animals per year which consist of 6.51 masked palm civets, 6.44 Asian palm civets, 4.55 muntjac, 3.97 lesser mouse-deer, 2.22 large Indian civets, 1.03 wild boars, 0.66 sambar, and 0.56 porcupines.
    [Show full text]
  • Global ICAP Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Final Report.Pdf
    Global Integrated Collection Assessment and Planning Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Omaha, NE, US, 19 – 20 March 2016 Final Report Workshop organized by: AZA Canid and Hyaenid Taxon Advisory Group; EAZA Canid and Hyaenid Taxon Advisory Group; ZAA Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group; IUCN SSC Canid Specialist Group; IUCN SSC Hyaenid Specialist Group; and the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group (CPSG). Workshop financial support provided by: Saint Louis Zoo and a private donation Photo credits (front cover, left to right): Row 1: African wild dog (Yorkshire Wildlife Park); Swift fox (M. Sovada); Darwin fox education (M. Zordan); Fennec fox research (Fitbit; R. Meibaum); Row 2: Culpeo fox (Zoologico Nacional – Parque Metropolitano de Santiago, Chile); spotted hyena (Colchester Zoo); bush dog (M. Jacob); maned wolf (Temaiken Foundation); Row 3: Dhole (B. Gupta); Mexican wolf (J. Fallon); striped hyena (T. Rehse); black‐backed jackal (Amersfoort Zoo) A contribution of the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CPSG 2018 Traylor‐Holzer, K., K.
    [Show full text]
  • Canids of the World Wolves, Wild Dogs, Foxes
    INTRODUCTION © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. RECOGNITION The Canid family is a lineage of terrestrial carnivorans, adapted for swift running, which includes Wolves, Coyotes, Jackals, Foxes, Dogs, Dingoes, Dholes and other Dog-like mammals, with a total of 13 genera and at least 37 extant species. They are mostly social animals, living together in family units or small groups and behaving cooperatively. Most are seasonal breeders producing a single litter each year. They exhibit many reproductive and behavioral traits uncommon in other mammals, such as monogamy with paternal care, long-term incorporation of young adults into the social group, alloparenting, inhibition of reproduction in subordinate individuals, monoestrus, and a copulatory tie. They inhabit temperate and tropical forests, savanna, tundra and deserts throughout the world, with the exception of some oceanic islands and Antarctica. Most Canids feed on mammalian prey, but vegetable matter, carrion, and invertebrates are also an important source of food in many species. Size and body shape (fig. 1): Canids vary widely in size, from the Gray Wolf, which may be up to 160 cm long, and can weigh up to 80 kg, to the diminutive Fennec Fox, which may be as little as 24 cm in length, and weighs less than 1 kg. Most Fox species weigh 1.5 to 9.0 kg, while most other species are 5 to 27 kg. Body lengths (without tail) range between 35 and 160 cm, and tail lengths are approximately 12 to 56 cm.
    [Show full text]