Preliminary Investigation of Cyanella Hyacinthoides (Tecophilaeaceae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reduced Visitation to the Buzz-Pollinated Cyanella Hyacinthoides In
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.17.440253; this version posted April 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Reduced visitation to the buzz-pollinated Cyanella hyacinthoides in 2 the presence of other pollen sources in the hyperdiverse Cape 3 Floristic Region 4 5 Jurene E. Kemp1 6 Francismeire J. Telles2 7 Mario Vallejo-Marin1 8 1Biological and Environmental Sciences. University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA. United Kingdom 9 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade 10 Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama, Bloco 2D, Sala 26, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. 11 Abstract 12 Many plant species have floral morphologies that restrict access to floral resources, such as pollen or 13 nectar, and only a subset of floral visitors can perform the complex handling behaviours required to 14 extract restricted resources. Due to the time and energy required to extract resources from 15 morphologically complex flowers, these plant species potentially compete for pollinators with co- 16 flowering plants that have more easily accessible resources. A widespread floral mechanism 17 restricting access to pollen is the presence of tubular anthers that open through small pores or slits 18 (poricidal anthers). Some bees have evolved the capacity to remove pollen from poricidal anthers 19 using vibrations, giving rise to the phenomenon of buzz-pollination. These bee vibrations that are 20 produced for pollen extraction are presumably energetically costly, and to date, few studies have 21 investigated whether buzz-pollinated flowers may be at a disadvantage when competing for 22 pollinators’ attention with plant species that present unrestricted pollen resources. -
Tecophilaeaceae 429 Tecophilaeaceae M.G
Tecophilaeaceae 429 Tecophilaeaceae M.G. SIMPSONand P.J. RUDALL Tecophilaeaceae Leyb., Bonplandia JO: 370 (1862), nom . cons . Cyanastraceae Engler (1900). Erect, perennial, terrestrial herbs. Roots fibrous. Subterranean stem a globose to ellipsoid corm, 1- 4 cm in diameter, in some genera with a membra nous to fibrous tunic consisting of persistent sheathing leaves or fibrovascular bundles . Leaves basal to subbasal, or cauline in Walleria, spiral; base sheathing or non-sheathing, blades narrowly linear to lanceolate -ovate, or more or less petiolate in Cyanastrum and Kabuyea; entire, glabrous, flat, or marginally undulate; venation parallel with a major central vein. Flowers terminal and either Fig. 122A-F. Tecophilaeaceae. Cyanastrum cordifolium . A Flowering plant. B Tepals with sta mens. C Stamens. D Pistil. E solitary (or in small groups) and a panicle or (in Ovary, longitudinal section. F Capsule. (Takh tajan 1982) Walleria) solitary in the axils of cauline leaves. Bracts and bracteoles (prophylls) often present on pedicel. Flowers 1- 3 cm long, pedicellate, bisexual , trimero us. Perianth variable in color, zygomor fibrous scale leaves or leaf bases or the reticulate phic or actinomorphic, homochlamydeous, ba fibrovascular remains of these scale leaves (Fig. sally syntepalous; perianth lobes 6, imbricate in 2 123). The tunic often continues above the corm, in whorls, the outer median tepal positioned anteri some cases forming an apical tuft. Corms of orly; minute corona appendages present between Walleria, Cyanastrum, and Kabuyea lack a corm adjacent stamens in some taxa. Androecium aris tunic (Fig. 122). ing at mouth of perianth tube, opposite the tepals Leaves are bifacial and spirally arranged. -
Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes
Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny. -
Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales J
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 24 2006 Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Ivan J. Maureira University of Wisconsin-Madison Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison Kenneth J. Systma University of Wisconsin-Madison Ole Seberg University of Copenhagen; Natural History Musem of Denmark See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Pires, J. Chris; Maureira, Ivan J.; Givnish, Thomas J.; Systma, Kenneth J.; Seberg, Ole; Peterson, Gitte; Davis, Jerrold I.; Stevenson, Dennis W.; Rudall, Paula J.; Fay, Michael F.; and Chase, Mark W. (2006) "Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 24. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/24 Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales Authors J. Chris Pires, Ivan J. Maureira, Thomas J. Givnish, Kenneth J. Systma, Ole Seberg, Gitte Peterson, Jerrold I. Davis, Dennis W. Stevenson, Paula J. Rudall, Michael F. Fay, and Mark W. Chase This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 24 Asparagales ~£~2COTSgy and Evolution Excluding Poales Aliso 22, pp. 287-304 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PHYLOGENY, GENOME SIZE, AND CHROMOSOME EVOLUTION OF ASPARAGALES 1 7 8 1 3 9 J. CHRIS PIRES, • • IVAN J. MAUREIRA, THOMAS J. GIVNISH, 2 KENNETH J. SYTSMA, 2 OLE SEBERG, · 9 4 6 GITTE PETERSEN, 3· JERROLD I DAVIS, DENNIS W. -
2 ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM History Of
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, or APG, refers to an informal international group of systematic botanists who came together to try to establish a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants (angiosperms) that would reflect new knowledge about their relationships based upon phylogenetic studies. As of 2010, three incremental versions of a classification system have resulted from this collaboration (published in 1998, 2003 and 2009). An important motivation for the group was what they viewed as deficiencies in prior angiosperm classifications, which were not based on monophyletic groups (i.e. groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor). APG publications are increasingly influential, with a number of major herbaria changing the arrangement of their collections to match the latest APG system. Angiosperm classification and the APG Until detailed genetic evidence became available, the classification of flowering plants (also known as angiosperms, Angiospermae, Anthophyta or Magnoliophyta) was based on their morphology (particularly that of the flower) and their biochemistry (what kinds of chemical compound they contained or produced). Classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group. The result was a large number of such systems (see List of systems of plant taxonomy). Different systems and their updates tended to be favoured in different countries; e.g. the Engler system in continental Europe; the Bentham & Hooker system in Britain (particularly influential because it was used by Kew); the Takhtajan system in the former Soviet Union and countries within its sphere of influence; and the Cronquist system in the United States. -
Effect of Temperature and Scarification on Seed Germination of Conanthera Spp
SCIENTIFIC NOTE Effect of temperature and scarification on seed germination of Conanthera spp. (Tecophilaeaceae) Carlos De la Cuadra1, Alexis K. Vidal1*, Felipe Lagomarsino1, Patricia Peñaloza1, Leví M. Mansur1, and Carlos Huenchuleo1 1Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Escuela de Agronomía, Casilla 4-D, Quillota, Chile. *Corresponding author ([email protected]). Received: 6 August 2018; Accepted: 10 January 2019; doi:10.4067/S0718-58392019000200323 ABSTRACT The Chilean endemic genus Conanthera is comprised of five species of herbaceous cormous geophytes. They have ornamental value due to their bell-shaped flowers, which are blue, violet or white. Previous germination studies of Conanthera campanulata and Conanthera trimaculata were carried out at 22 °C, and manual mechanical scarification improved germination. Based on these results, it was suggested that physical dormancy is present in the non-scarified seeds. However, an improvement in germination after scarification is not enough evidence to conclude that the seed is non-permeable to water and thus has physical dormancy. The objective of the present study was to assess the testa water permeability via an imbibition test and to identify the optimum germination temperature in C. campanulata and C. trimaculata. Using 6-mo-old seeds, data from the imbibition tests showed that neither the seeds of C. campanulata nor C. trimaculata have physical dormancy. In the germination experiments, the temperature range for achieving high germination percentages was 10 to 15 °C, where germination reached 90% in less than 28 d. Temperature of 20 °C can be considered supra-optimal, while 5 and 25 °C inhibited germination. Manual mechanical scarification did not affect germination results at the range of 10 to 15 °C. -
Asphodelaceae) and the Inclusion of Chortolirion in Aloe
Phylogeny of Alooideae TAXON Molecular and morphological analysis of subfamily Alooideae (Asphodelaceae) and the inclusion of Chortolirion in Aloe Barnabas H. Daru,! John C. Manning,"#$ James S. Boatwright,% Olivier Maurin,! Norman Maclean,& Hanno Schaefer,' Maria Kuzmina( & Michelle van der Bank! 1 African Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524 Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa 2 Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, Cape Town, South Africa School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, Hants, SO16 7PX, U.K. 6 Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Biodiversitaet der Pflanzen, Maximus-von-Imhof Forum 2, 85354 Freising, Germany International Barcode of Life Project, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada Barnabas H. Daru, [email protected] Abstract matKrbcLa trnH-psbA Haworthia Astroloba Gasteria Astroloba H. RobustipeduncularesChortolirion Aloe Aloe A. aristata Haworthia Robustipedunculares Keywords matK rbcLa trnH-psbA Supplementary Material INTRODUCTION Aloe Gasteria AstrolobaHaworthia - - Aloe - Gasteria x -
DDC) Stemming from the Adoption of the APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) III Classification As the Basis for the DDC’S Treatment of Flowering Plants
This PDF documents proposed changes throughout the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) stemming from the adoption of the APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) III classification as the basis for the DDC’s treatment of flowering plants. We request comment from any interested party, to be sent to Rebecca Green ([email protected]) by 31 January 2016. Please include “Angiosperm review comments” in your subject line. -------------------------------------------------------------- Why is the DDC adopting a new basis for classifying angiosperms (flowering plants)? During the latter half of the 20th century, biological classification turned from establishing taxa predominantly on the basis of morphological similarities to establishing taxa predominantly on the basis of shared ancestry / shared derived characters, with biological taxonomies mirroring evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic analysis typically underlies modern evolutionary classifications, but has resulted in the development of many competing classifications. Within the domain of flowering plants, different classification systems have been favored in different countries. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, a global consortium of botanists, has addressed this issue by developing a “consensus” classification that is monophyletic (i.e., its taxa include all but only the descendants of a common ancestor). Now in its third version, the APG III classification is considered relatively stable and useful for both research and practice (e.g., for organizing plants in herbaria). The development for flowering plants presented here is the culmination of DDC editorial work over a span of several years. An early version revised 583–584 to make the schedule compatible with the APG III classification, while trying to minimize relocations and using see references to establish the APG III logical hierarchy. -
Thonner's Analytical Key to the Families of Flowering Plants
Thonner's analyticalke y to thefamilie s of flowering plants R.Geesin k A.J .M .Leeuwenber g C.E.Ridsdale J.F .Veldkam p PUDOC, Centre for Agricultural Leiden University Press Publishing and Documentation The Hague/Boston/London, Wageningen, 1981 1981 /1/0 07 (P- :>< R. Geesink-Rijksherbarium, Leiden, Netherlands A. J. M. Leeuwenberg - Laboratorium voor Plantensystematiek en Planten- geografie, Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands C. E. Ridsdale-B. A. Krukoff Botanist ofMalesia n Botany, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, Netherlands J. F. Veldkamp-Rijksherbarium, Leiden, Netherlands This volume isliste d inth eLibrar y of Congress Cataloging inPublicatio n Data Thisi sa translate d and revised edition of:Anleitun g zumBestimme n der Familien der Blutenpflanzen, 2nd. ed. 1917, Friedländer, Berlin ISBN 90-220-0730-8 © Centre foragricultura l publishing and documentation, PUDOC, Wageningen 1981 and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1981 Allright sreserved . Nopar t ofthi spublicatio n mayb ereproduced , stored ina retrieva l system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, P.O. Box 566, 2501 CN The Hague, The Netherlands, and PUDOC, P.O. Box 4,670 0A AWageningen , TheNetherland s Printed inth e Netherlands Contents Preface toth e2n deditio n(1917 ) vii Introduction viii Acknowledgements x FranzThonne r- Life (1863-1928) xii FranzThonner-Bibliograph y xv FranzThonner-Derive dwork s xviii FranzThonner-Eponym y xx The Key - Introduction and Notes xxii Schemefo r adiagnosti cdescriptio n xxvi Conciseke yt oth ema jo rgrouping s 1 Keyt oth efamilie s 3 Glossary 198 Index 214 'All plants are hybrids, but some are greater bastards than others' lf*!Mfc .-, -e *••-r • + VT-V «-•! * . -
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) System
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) system The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, or APG, refers to an informal international group of systematic botanists who came together to try to establish a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants (angiosperms) that would reflect new knowledge about their relationships based upon phylogenetic studies. As of 2010, three incremental versions of a classification system have resulted from this collaboration (published in 1998, 2003 and 2009). An important motivation for the group was what they viewed as deficiencies in prior angiosperm classifications, which were not based on monophyletic groups (i.e. groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor). APG publications are increasingly influential, with a number of major herbaria changing the arrangement of their collections to match the latest APG system. Angiosperm classification and the APG Until detailed genetic evidence became available, the classification of flowering plants (also known as angiosperms, Angiospermae , Anthophyta or Magnoliophyta ) was based on their morphology (particularly that of the flower) and their biochemistry (what kinds of chemical compound they contained or produced). Classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group. The result was a large number of such systems (see List of systems of plant taxonomy). Different systems and their updates tended to be favoured in different countries; e.g. the Engler system in continental Europe; the Bentham & Hooker system in Britain (particularly influential because it was used by Kew); the Takhtajan system in the former Soviet Union and countries within its sphere of influence; and the Cronquist system in the United States. -
The Demise of the Liliaceae Or Lily Family
THE DEMISE OF THE LILIACEAE OR LILY FAMILY HOW THE ONCE-DIVERSE FAMILY HAS BEEN SPLINTERED INTO MANY PIECES The broad definition of the Liliaceae has always been a source of controversy and the borders of the family have had many interpretations • The 1993 Jepson Manual took the broadest approach possible, not even recognizing the Agavaceae (agave family) or Amaryllidaceae (amaryllis family), which were recognized as distinctive by most botanists • Now the new manual has taken a diametrically different view and embraced the evidence that the family is not a natural unit and the plants in it belong to unrelated lines The result of this change is that suddenly, there are many separate families to learn about and identify • In California, we recognize 10 native families but in the rest of the world, many others have also been split off from the original Liliaceae • Unfortunately, many of these separate families are not easy to key out or recognize by easily seen traits, making it harder for the beginner to grasp the different groups The reasons for these changes are based on many lines of evidence, many of which are not easily seen • For example, DNA studies have indicated that superficially similar looking plants like Nolina and Yucca are not at all closely related • Meanwhile genera in some families do not look superficially similar as, for example, Agave and Chlorogalum (soap plant), both in the family Agavaceae • Other lines of evidence for these changes include studies in biochemistry, embryo development, seed and fruit structure, and -
LIBERTO'sseeds and BULBS
LIBERTO’s SEEDS AND BULBS BULB SEEDS 2018 /2019 There is a general tendency not to equate bulbs with growing them from seed. Unfortunately, there are many myths involved in raising bulbs from seed. People generally think that they take many years to grow and flower but that is only true for very few bulbs, usually in Amaryllidaceae. The majority of bulbs in other families will flower within three years of growing and many in their second year (relate that to how many years does an herbaceous perennial or a shrub need to reach adult size from seed!). People also believe that bulb seed is hard to germinate. Fresh bulb seed, especially of Mediterranean taxa, is usually guaranteed to sprout (and in most cases without specific germination techniques like cold stratification). Don’t be afraid to try some new bulbs from seed. It is very likely that this is the only way to find some species and you can fill a whole pot with flowers for the price you’d pay for one bulb or less! Please scroll to the end of the catalog for sowing and ordering instructions. Listings of orange color, are new items in the 2018/2019 list. Albuca – An interesting genus from South Africa with peculiar flowers, the following are all spring flowering species and they tend to stay evergreen, keeping some leaves during winter but then coming back to full growth in spring. I like to sow their seeds in autumn and in case of a frost I protect the young seedlings. Keep the adult bulbs relatively dry during winter.