DOCSLIB.ORG

Taxonomie a Ekologie Rodu Enterococcus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taxonomie a Ekologie Rodu Enterococcus ___________________________________________________________________________ MasarykovauniverzitavBrně Přírodovědeckáfakulta Ústavexperimentální biologie,Oddělenímikrobiologie Taxonomie a ekologie rodu Enterococcus (Bakalářská prácestudijníhoprogramuBiologie oboruObecná biologie –směrMikrobiologie) Hana Bryndová Brno,Českárepublika2008 ___________________________________________________________________________ 1 Za cenné rady,ochotnoupomoc a čas,kterými věnoval při vznikutétopráce,tímto děkuji RNDr.PavluŠvecovi,PhD.,podjehož vedením jsem bakalářskoupráci zpracovala na půděČeskésbírkymikroorganismů. 2 Obsah 1. Úvod...................................................................................................................................6 2. Cíl práce .............................................................................................................................6 3. Taxonomie rodu Enterococcus ...........................................................................................7 3.1 Historietaxonomierodu Enterococcus ......................................................................7 3.2 Současnátaxonomierodu Enterococcus ....................................................................7 3.3 Charakteristikarodu Enterococcus ............................................................................9 3.3.1 Fylogenetickézařazení rodu Enterococcus ............................................................9 3.3.2 Základnícharakteristika .........................................................................................9 3.3.3 Metabolismus .......................................................................................................10 3.3.4 Buněčnástěna .......................................................................................................11 3.3.5 Antigennívlastnosti ..............................................................................................11 3.3.6 Charakteristikagenomu ........................................................................................12 3.3.6.1 Transpozony.................................................................................................13 3.3.6.2 Plasmidy .......................................................................................................13 3.4 Stručnácharakteristikafylogenetickypříbuznýchrodů...........................................14 3.4.1 Atopobacter ..........................................................................................................14 3.4.2 Melissococcus .......................................................................................................15 3.4.3 Tetragenococcus ...................................................................................................15 3.4.4 Vagococcus ...........................................................................................................15 3.4.5 Pilibacter ..............................................................................................................16 3.4.6 Catellicoccus ........................................................................................................16 4. Izolaceaidentifikace ........................................................................................................17 4.1 Izolaceenterokoků...................................................................................................17 4.1.1 Média používanákizolacienterokoků.................................................................17 4.1.2 Kultivační média ..................................................................................................18 4.2 Identifikace enterokoků ............................................................................................19 4.2.1 Klasické testypoužívané při identifikacienterokoků..........................................19 4.2.2 Metodyfenotypovétypizace ................................................................................20 4.2.3 Metodygenotypizace ...........................................................................................20 4.2.3.1 RestrikčníanalýzachromozomálníDNA ....................................................20 4.2.3.2 Ribotypizace .................................................................................................21 4.2.3.3 MetodyzaloženénaPCR .............................................................................21 4.2.3.4 Makrorestrikčníanalýza ...............................................................................21 4.2.3.5 Sekvenační metody ......................................................................................22 5. Ekologierodu Enterococcus ............................................................................................23 5.1 Charakteristikadruhůrodu Enterococcus ................................................................23 5.1.1 Enterococcus aquimarinus ...................................................................................24 5.1.2 Enterococcus asini ...............................................................................................24 5.1.3 Enterococcus avium .............................................................................................24 5.1.4 Enterococcus caccae ............................................................................................24 5.1.5 Enterococcus camelliae ........................................................................................24 3 5.1.6 Enterococcus canintestini ....................................................................................25 5.1.7 Enterococcus canis ...............................................................................................25 5.1.8 Enterococcus casseliflavus ...................................................................................25 5.1.9 Enterococcus cecorum .........................................................................................25 5.1.10 Enterococcus columbae ....................................................................................25 5.1.11 Enterococcus devriesei .....................................................................................26 5.1.12 Enterococcus dispar .........................................................................................26 5.1.13 Enterococcus durans ........................................................................................26 5.1.14 Enterococcus faecalis .......................................................................................26 5.1.15 Enterococcus faecium ......................................................................................27 5.1.16 Enterococcus gallinarum .................................................................................27 5.1.17 Enterococcus gilvus ..........................................................................................27 5.1.18 Enterococcus haemoperoxidus .........................................................................27 5.1.19 Enterococcus hermanniensis ............................................................................27 5.1.20 Enterococcus hirae ...........................................................................................28 5.1.21 Enterococcus italicus .......................................................................................28 5.1.22 Enterococcus malodoratus ...............................................................................28 5.1.23 Enterococcus moraviensis ................................................................................28 5.1.24 Enterococcus mundtii .......................................................................................29 5.1.25 Enterococcus pallens ........................................................................................29 5.1.26 Enterococcus phoeniculicola ...........................................................................29 5.1.27 Enterococcus pseudoavium ..............................................................................29 5.1.28 Enterococcus raffinosus ...................................................................................29 5.1.29 Enterococcus ratti ............................................................................................30 5.1.30 Enterococcus saccharolyticus ..........................................................................30 5.1.31 Enterococcus silesiacus ....................................................................................30 5.1.32 Enterococcus sulfureus ....................................................................................30 5.1.33 Enterococcus termitis .......................................................................................31 5.1.34 Enterococcus villorum ......................................................................................31 5.2 Fylogenetickéčleněnírodu Enterococcus ................................................................31 5.2.1 Skupinadruhu Enterococcus faecalis ..................................................................31 5.2.2 Skupinadruhu Enterococcus faecium ..................................................................32 5.2.3 Skupinadruhu Enterococcus avium .....................................................................32 5.2.4 Skupinadruhu Enterococcus gallinarum .............................................................32 5.2.5 Skupinadruhu Enterococcus cecorum .................................................................32 5.2.6 Druhytvořícísamostatnéfylogenetickévětve
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suppl Table 2
    Table S2. Large subunit rRNA gene sequences of Bacteria and Eukarya from V5. ["n" indicates information not specified in the NCBI GenBank database.] Accession number Q length Q start Q end e-value %-ident %-sim GI number Domain Phylum Family Genus / Species JQ997197 529 30 519 3E-165 89% 89% 48728139 Bacteria Actinobacteria Frankiaceae uncultured Frankia sp. JQ997198 732 17 128 2E-35 93% 93% 48728167 Bacteria Actinobacteria Frankiaceae uncultured Frankia sp. JQ997196 521 26 506 4E-95 81% 81% 48728178 Bacteria Actinobacteria Frankiaceae uncultured Frankia sp. JQ997274 369 8 54 4E-14 100% 100% 289551862 Bacteria Actinobacteria Mycobacteriaceae Mycobacterium abscessus JQ999637 486 5 321 7E-62 82% 82% 269314044 Bacteria Actinobacteria Mycobacteriaceae Mycobacterium immunoGenum JQ999638 554 17 509 0 92% 92% 44368 Bacteria Actinobacteria Mycobacteriaceae Mycobacterium kansasii JQ999639 552 18 455 0 93% 93% 196174916 Bacteria Actinobacteria Mycobacteriaceae Mycobacterium sHottsii JQ997284 598 5 598 0 90% 90% 2414571 Bacteria Actinobacteria Propionibacteriaceae Propionibacterium freudenreicHii JQ999640 567 14 560 8E-152 85% 85% 6714990 Bacteria Actinobacteria THermomonosporaceae Actinoallomurus spadix JQ997287 501 8 306 4E-119 93% 93% 5901576 Bacteria Actinobacteria THermomonosporaceae THermomonospora cHromoGena JQ999641 332 26 295 8E-115 95% 95% 291045144 Bacteria Actinobacteria Bifidobacteriaceae Bifidobacterium bifidum JQ999642 349 19 255 5E-82 90% 90% 30313593 Bacteria Bacteroidetes Bacteroidaceae Bacteroides caccae JQ997308 588 20 582 0 90%
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification and Probiotic Potential Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Human Vaginal Microbiota
    Advanced Adv Pharm Bull, 2018, 8(4), 683-695 Pharmaceutical doi: 10.15171/apb.2018.077 Bulletin http://apb.tbzmed.ac.ir Research Article Molecular Identification and Probiotic Potential Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Human Vaginal Microbiota Yousef Nami1* , Babak Haghshenas2, Ahmad Yari Khosroushahi3,4 1 Department of Food Biotechnology, Branch for Northwest & West Region, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz, Iran. 2 Regenerative Medicine Research Center (RMRC), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. 3 Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 4 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Article info Abstract Article History: Purpose: The increased demand for probiotics because of their health purposes provides the Received: 22 November 2017 context for this study, which involves the molecular identification of lactic acid bacteria Revised: 28 July 2018 (LAB) obtained from the vaginal microbiota of healthy fertile women. The isolates were Accepted: 15 August 2018 subjected for examination to prove their probiotic potential. In particular, the isolates were ePublished: 29 November 2018 subjected to various tests, including acid/bile tolerance, antimicrobial activity, antibiotic susceptibility, Gram staining, and catalase enzyme activity assessment. Keywords: Methods: Several methods were utilized for the molecular identification of the isolates, Molecular identification including ARDRA, (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting, and the PCR sequencing of 16S-rDNA Probiotic characterization amplified fragments. Disc diffusion and well diffusion methods were used to assess (GTG)5-fingerprinting antibiotic susceptibility and antibacterial activity of isolates. Tolerance to acid and bile was Lactic acid bacteria performed at pH 2.5 and 0.3% bile oxgall.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance Mechanisms and Inflammatory Bowel Disease 10.1515/Med-2020-0032 Present Multi-Resistant E
    Open Med. 2020; 15: 211-224 Research Article Michaela Růžičková, Monika Vítězová, Ivan Kushkevych* The characterization of Enterococcus genus: resistance mechanisms and inflammatory bowel disease https://doi.org/ 10.1515/med-2020-0032 present multi-resistant E. faecium belongs to a different received September 18, 2019; accepted February 5, 2020 taxon than the original strains isolated from animals. This separation must have happened around 75 years ago and Abstract: The constantly growing bacterial resistance is being connected to antibiotic usage in clinical practice. against antibiotics is recently causing serious problems This clade can be distinguished by its increased number in the field of human and veterinary medicine as well as of mobile genetic elements, metabolic alternations and in agriculture. The mechanisms of resistance formation hypermutability [1]. All of these attributes led to the devel- and its preventions are not well explored in most bacterial opment of a flexible genome, which is now able to easily genera. The aim of this review is to analyse recent litera- adapt to the changes of the surroundings [2,3]. ture data on the principles of antibiotic resistance forma- It is also necessary to mention some basic informa- tion in bacteria of the Enterococcus genus. Furthermore, tion about morphological diversity, physiological and bio- the habitat of the Enterococcus genus, its pathogenicity chemical characteristics and taxonomy in order to under- and pathogenicity factors, its epidemiology, genetic and stand the resistance mechanisms completely. Biochemical molecular aspects of antibiotic resistance, and the rela- features must especially be mentioned since they play a tionship between these bacteria and bowel diseases are huge role in the high increase of resistance in these bac- discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Université De Lille1-Sciences Et Technologies
    UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE1-SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIES École doctorale de Science de la Matière, de Rayonnement et de l’Environnement THÈSE DE DOCTORAT Spécialité : Ingénierie des Fonctions Biologiques Présentée par ALAA ABDULHUSSAIN AL-SERAIH Pour l’obtention du grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE 1 Propriétés Antagonistes et Probiotiques de Nouvelles Bactéries Lactiques et Levures Isolées des Matières Fécales Humaine et Animale No Ordre 42128 Préparée à l’institut Charles Viollette (ICV)- EA7394 Présentée, le 10 Novembre 2016 devant le jury composé de : Véronique Delcenserie Professeur Université de Liège, Belgique Nathalie Connil Maître de conférence-HDR. Université de Rouen-Haute Normandie Djamel Drider Professeur Université de Lille 1 John Baah Directeur de Recherche et développement Best Environmental Technologies,Canada Benoit Cudennec Maître de conférence. Université de Lille 1 François Krier Maître de conférence. Université de Lille1 Acknowledgements I would like to convey my heartfelt gratitude and sincere appreciation to all the people who have helped and inspired me during my doctoral study. This thesis would not have been possible without the support of many people. First of all, I would like to express my deep appreciation and gratitude to my honorable advisor, Professor Dr. Djamel Drider, for the patient guidance and mentorship he provided to me throughout my PhD study. Professor Drider’s intellectual heft is matched only by his genuine good nature and humility, and I am truly fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with him. Also, with a deep sense of honor, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Dr. Pascal Dhulster, the director of Charles Viollette Institute, for his unceasing and encouraging support.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures Under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
    Original Research Paper Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions Annalena Reitz1, Sven Poppert2,3, Melanie Rieker4 and Hagen Frickmann5,6* 1University Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany 2Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland 3Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland 4MVZ Humangenetik Ulm, Ulm, Germany 5Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 6Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany Received: 04 September 2018; accepted: 18 September 2018 Background: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. Methods: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. Results: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a spec- ificity of >95% in all instances.
    [Show full text]
  • Age-Related Differences in the Cloacal Microbiota of a Wild Bird Species
    van Dongen et al. BMC Ecology 2013, 13:11 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/13/11 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Age-related differences in the cloacal microbiota of a wild bird species Wouter FD van Dongen1*, Joël White1,2, Hanja B Brandl1, Yoshan Moodley1, Thomas Merkling2, Sarah Leclaire2, Pierrick Blanchard2, Étienne Danchin2, Scott A Hatch3 and Richard H Wagner1 Abstract Background: Gastrointestinal bacteria play a central role in the health of animals. The bacteria that individuals acquire as they age may therefore have profound consequences for their future fitness. However, changes in microbial community structure with host age remain poorly understood. We characterised the cloacal bacteria assemblages of chicks and adults in a natural population of black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla), using molecular methods. Results: We show that the kittiwake cloaca hosts a diverse assemblage of bacteria. A greater number of total bacterial OTUs (operational taxonomic units) were identified in chicks than adults, and chicks appeared to host a greater number of OTUs that were only isolated from single individuals. In contrast, the number of bacteria identified per individual was higher in adults than chicks, while older chicks hosted more OTUs than younger chicks. Finally, chicks and adults shared only seven OTUs, resulting in pronounced differences in microbial assemblages. This result is surprising given that adults regurgitate food to chicks and share the same nesting environment. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that chick gastrointestinal tracts are colonised by many transient species and that bacterial assemblages gradually transition to a more stable adult state. Phenotypic differences between chicks and adults may lead to these strong differences in bacterial communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Changes and Safety of Lightly Preserved Seafood
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 Microbial changes and safety of lightly preserved seafood Mejlholm, Ole Publication date: 2007 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Mejlholm, O. (2007). Microbial changes and safety of lightly preserved seafood. DIFRES, DTU. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Microbial Changes and Safety of Lightly Preserved Seafood By Ole Mejlholm Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Seafood Research, Technical University of Denmark Preface The present Ph.D.-project has been carried out at the Danish Institute for Fisheries Research (DIFRES) in Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark under the supervision of senior scientist Paw Dalgaard. The presented work was financed by the Danish Directorate for Food, Fisheries and Agri Business. I wish to thank Paw Dalgaard for his support and many valuable discussions, and for introducing me to predictive microbiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Erica M. D. Scheidegger 2009
    Érica Miranda Damasio Scheidegger IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE ESPÉCIES DE ENTEROCOCCUS ISOLADAS DE QUEIJO MINAS TIPO FRESCAL ATRAVÉS DA ANÁLISE DO POLIMORFISMO DOS FRAGMENTOS DE RESTRIÇÃO DE PARTE DO GENE 16S rRNA AMPLIFICADO PELA PCR PPGVS INCQS / FIOCRUZ 2009 IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE ESPÉCIES DE ENTEROCOCCUS ISOLADAS DE QUEIJO MINAS TIPO FRESCAL ATRAVÉS DA ANÁLISE DO POLIMORFISMO DOS FRAGMENTOS DE RESTRIÇÃO DE PARTE DO GENE 16S rRNA AMPLIFICADO PELA PCR Érica Miranda Damasio Scheidegger Programa de Pós-Graduação em Vigilância Sanitária Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Orientadora: Dra.Paola Cardarelli Leite, Ph.D Rio de Janeiro 2009 IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE ESPÉCIES DE ENTEROCOCCUS ISOLADAS DE QUEIJO MINAS TIPO FRESCAL ATRAVÉS DA ANÁLISE DO POLIMORFISMO DOS FRAGMENTOS DE RESTRIÇÃO DE PARTE DO GENE 16S rRNA AMPLIFICADO PELA PCR Érica Miranda Damasio Scheidegger Dissertação submetida à Comissão Examinadora composta pelo corpo docente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Vigilância Sanitária do Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz e por professores convidados de outras instituições, como parte dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre. Aprovado: _____________________________________________________(IMPPG/UFRJ ) Prof. Dr. Sérgio Eduardo Longo Fracalanzza ____________________________________________________(INCQS/Fiocruz) Prof. Dr. Victor Augustus Marin ____________________________________________________(INCQS/Fiocruz) Prof. Dra. Maria Helena Simões Villas Bôas Orientadora ________________________________________________ Prof. Dra. Paola Cardarelli Leite Rio de Janeiro 2009 ii Scheidegger, Érica Miranda Damasio Identificação de espécies de Enterococcus isoladas de queijo Minas tipo frescal através da análise do polimorfismo dos fragmentos de restrição de parte do gene 16 rRNA amplificado pela PCR. / Érica Miranda Damasio Scheidegger. Rio de Janeiro: INCQS/FIOCRUZ, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Exposure to Lactic Acid Bacteria from Foods of Animal Origin in Human Health
    foods Review Role of Exposure to Lactic Acid Bacteria from Foods of Animal Origin in Human Health Carla Miranda 1,2,3 , Diogo Contente 2 , Gilberto Igrejas 3,4,5 , Sandra P. A. Câmara 6, Maria de Lurdes Enes Dapkevicius 6,7,* and Patrícia Poeta 1,2,3 1 Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Team (MicroART), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (P.P.) 2 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] 3 Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry (LAQV-REQUIMTE), University NOVA of Lisboa, 2829-546 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal 5 Functional Genomics and Proteomics Unit, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal 6 Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Technology (IITAA), University of the Azores, 9500-321 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal; [email protected] 7 Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of the Azores, 9500-321 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Animal products, in particular dairy and fermented products, are major natural sources of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). These are known for their antimicrobial properties, as well as for their Citation: Miranda, C.; Contente, D.; roles in organoleptic changes, antioxidant activity, nutrient digestibility, the release of peptides and Igrejas, G.; Câmara, S.P.A.; polysaccharides, amino acid decarboxylation, and biogenic amine production and degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Identification of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from Cattle Farm Soil in Dibrugarh District
    Advances in Microbiology, 2017, 7, 265-279 http://www.scirp.org/journal/aim ISSN Online: 2165-3410 ISSN Print: 2165-3402 Isolation and Identification of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from Cattle Farm Soil in Dibrugarh District Nuredin Mohamedkassm Siraj1*, Kaushal Sood2, Raj Narayan Singh Yadav3 1Asmara College of Health Sciences, Asmara, Eritrea 2Centre for Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Dibrugarh University, Assam, India 3Department of Life Sciences, Dibrugarh University, Assam, India How to cite this paper: Siraj, N.M., Sood, Abstract K. and Yadav, R.N.S. (2017) Isolation and Identification of Potential Probiotic Bacte- Several studies have been done to isolate probiotic bacteria from different ria from Cattle Farm Soil in Dibrugarh Dis- sources. In this present study, an attempt was made to isolate, screen and trict. Advances in Microbiology, 7, 265- identify potential probiotic bacteria from cattle farm soil in Dibrugarh district, 279. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2017.74022 Assam, India. At the level of screening, the result showed the isolates desig- nated as DUA4, DUD3 and DUE2 showed a percent survival rate of 75.36, Received: February 23, 2017 69.14 and 52.36 respectively at a pH of 2.5. Similarly survival rate of the same Accepted: April 22, 2017 Published: April 26, 2017 isolates in 0.5% bile salt condition was found to be 117.17%, 144.59% and 118.10% for the isolates DUA4, DUD3 and DUE2 respectively. Antimicrobial Copyright © 2017 by authors and activity of the isolates towards the indicator organisms tested showed that Scientific Research Publishing Inc. DUA4 inhibited gram positive organisms while DUD3 showed activity against This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International both gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of Coccal Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Meat and the Meat Processing Environment
    Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Helsinki Finland TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF COCCAL LACTIC ACID BACTERIA ASSOCIATED WITH MEAT AND THE MEAT PROCESSING ENVIRONMENT Riitta Rahkila ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in Biocenter 2, auditorium 1041, Viikinkaari 5, Helsinki, on 8 May 2015, at 12 noon. Helsinki 2015 Director of studies Professor Johanna Björkroth Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Healt Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Helsinki Finland Supervised by Professor Johanna Björkroth Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Helsinki Finland PhD Per Johansson Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Helsinki Finland Reviewed by Professor George-John Nychas Agricultural University of Athens Athens, Greece Professor Danilo Ercolini University of Naples Federico II Naples, Italy Opponent Professor Kaarina Sivonen Department of Food and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry University of Helsinki Finland ISBN 978-951-51-1103-6 (pbk.) Hansaprint Vantaa 2015 ISBN 978-951-51-1104-3 (PDF) http://ethesis.helsinki.fi ABSTRACT Spoilage of modified atmosphere (MAP) or vacuum-packaged meat is often caused by psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria (LAB). LAB contamination occurs during the slaughter or processing of meat. During storage LAB become the dominant microbiota due to their ability to grow at refrigeration temperatures and to resist the microbial inhibitory effect of CO2. Spoilage is a complex phenomenon caused by the metabolic activities and interactions of the microbes growing in late shelf-life meat which has still not been fully explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversité Des Bactéries Halophiles Dans L'écosystème Fromager Et
    Diversité des bactéries halophiles dans l'écosystème fromager et étude de leurs impacts fonctionnels Diversity of halophilic bacteria in the cheese ecosystem and the study of their functional impacts Thèse de doctorat de l'université Paris-Saclay École doctorale n° 581 Agriculture, Alimentation, Biologie, Environnement et Santé (ABIES) Spécialité de doctorat: Microbiologie Unité de Recherche : Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France Référent : AgroParisTech Thèse présentée et soutenue à Paris-Saclay, le 01/04/2021 par Caroline Isabel KOTHE Composition du Jury Michel-Yves MISTOU Président Directeur de Recherche, INRAE centre IDF - Jouy-en-Josas - Antony Monique ZAGOREC Rapporteur & Examinatrice Directrice de Recherche, INRAE centre Pays de la Loire Nathalie DESMASURES Rapporteur & Examinatrice Professeure, Université de Caen Normandie Françoise IRLINGER Examinatrice Ingénieure de Recherche, INRAE centre IDF - Versailles-Grignon Jean-Louis HATTE Examinateur Ingénieur Recherche et Développement, Lactalis Direction de la thèse Pierre RENAULT Directeur de thèse Directeur de Recherche, INRAE (centre IDF - Jouy-en-Josas - Antony) 2021UPASB014 : NNT Thèse de doctorat de Thèse “A master in the art of living draws no sharp distinction between her work and her play; her labor and her leisure; her mind and her body; her education and her recreation. She hardly knows which is which. She simply pursues her vision of excellence through whatever she is doing, and leaves others to determine whether she is working or playing. To herself, she always appears to be doing both.” Adapted to Lawrence Pearsall Jacks REMERCIEMENTS Remerciements L'opportunité de faire un doctorat, en France, à l’Unité mixte de recherche MICALIS de Jouy-en-Josas a provoqué de nombreux changements dans ma vie : un autre pays, une autre langue, une autre culture et aussi, un nouveau domaine de recherche.
    [Show full text]