1 Improving seed germination of the rootstock torvum by testing multiple

2 factors using an orthogonal array design

3

4 R.H.G. Ranila, H.M.L. Niranb, M. Plazasc, R.M. Fonsekaa, H.H. Fonsekad, S. Vilanovac, I. Andújarc,

5 P. Gramazioc, A. Fitac, J. Prohensc,*

6

7 aDepartment of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Old Galaha Road,

8 Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka

9 bAgriculture Research Station, Girandurukotte 90750, Sri Lanka

10 cInstituto de Conservacion y Mejora de la Agrodiversidad Valenciana, Universitat Politècnica de

11 València, Camino de Vera 14, 46022 Valencia, Spain

12 dHorticultural Crop Research and Development Institute, Gannoruwa Road, Peradeniya 20400, Sri

13 Lanka

14

15 *Corresponding author. Tel: +34 963879424; fax: +34 963879422.

16 E-mail addresses: [email protected] (R.H.G. Ranil), [email protected] (H.M.L. Niran),

17 [email protected] (M. Plazas), [email protected] (R.M. Fonseka),

18 [email protected] (H.H. Fonseka), [email protected] (S. Vilanova),

19 [email protected] (I. Andújar), [email protected] (P. Gramazio), [email protected] (A. Fita),

20 [email protected] (J. Prohens)

21

22

1

23 ABSTRACT

24 Solanum torvum is a highly vigorous relative of eggplant that is resistant to a number of harmful

25 soil-borne diseases and is compatible for grafting with eggplant. Being a potential rootstock, this

26 frequently presents poor and erratic germination, which makes its practical use difficult. We

27 used an L8 (27) orthogonal array design to evaluate the primary effects of seven factors (soaking of

28 seeds, scarification with sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), application of gibberellic acid (GA3), use of

29 potassium mitrate (KNO3) as a moistening agent, cold stratification, application of a heat shock, and

30 light irradiation during germination) at two levels (L0 and L1) using four germination parameters

31 (early and final germination, germination rate and vigour index) in fresh S. torvum seeds. Solanum

32 torvum seeds had a strong dormancy with no germination in the untreated seeds and high early and

33 final germination (approximately 100%) in certain treatments. An evaluation of the main effects

34 revealed highly positive effects on germination from seed soaking, and the use of GA3, KNO3, and

35 light irradiation, whereas NaClO scarification had a negative effect. The application of cold

36 stratification and heat shock treatments also had a positive effect on seed germination but to a lesser

37 extent than the other treatments. An improved proposed protocol that consisted of subjecting seeds

38 to soaking, the application of GA3 and KNO3, cold stratification, heat shock, and light irradiation

39 was validated and demonstrated to be highly effective, with seed germination success greater than

40 60% being observed at 3 d and final germination reaching a plateau at 6 d. A second validation

41 experiment using a commercial growing substrate also showed a high emergence (approximately

42 50%) at 7 d and a final germination of approximately 80% was recorded with application of the

43 improved protocol. The seed germination protocol that we have developed will facilitate the use of

44 S. torvum as a rootstock for eggplant and its use in breeding programmes. Our results also reveal

45 that orthogonal array designs are a powerful tool for establishing improved protocols for seed

46 germination.

47

48 Keywords: Solanum torvum, seed, germination, dormancy, orthogonal arrays, main effects

2

49

50 1. Introduction

51

52 Solanum torvum Sw., commonly known as turkey berry, devil’s fig or pea eggplant, is a

53 wild bush of neotropical origin that belongs to the “spiny Solanum” (subgenus Leptostemonum)

54 group (Levin et al., 2006). This has become naturalised and is sometimes invasive in

55 tropical areas of Africa, Asia, and Australia; also, this species is occasionally cultivated, primarily

56 in Southeast Asia and Africa, for its edible fruits (Gousset et al., 2005; Nyadanu and Lowor, 2015).

57 Solanum torvum is of great interest as a rootstock for eggplant (S. melongena L.), as the plant is

58 highly vigorous, fully graft-compatible with eggplant scions (Gisbert et al., 2011b; Moncada et al.,

59 2013), and possesses resistance to a wide range of soil pathogens, such as Verticillium dahliae,

60 Ralstonia solanacearum, Fusarium oxysporum, and root-knot-nematodes (Bletsos et al., 2003;

61 Gousset et al., 2005; Bagnaresi et al., 2013), as well as being tolerant to abiotic stresses (Schwarz et

62 al., 2010). Furthermore, eggplant fruits produced on scions grafted onto S. torvum are of good

63 quality (Gisbert et al., 2011b; Moncada et al., 2013; Miceli et al., 2014). Additionally, grafting

64 eggplant on S. torvum reduces translocation of the heavy metal cadmium (Cd) from the roots to the

65 aerial part (Arao et al., 2008) and may minimize the negative effects on the fruit quality from Cd

66 soil contamination (Savvas et al., 2010). Because of these desirable traits, S. torvum also represents

67 a genetic resource of strong relevance to the introgression breeding of eggplant (Kumchai et al.,

68 2013)

69 The primary limitation for the practical use of S. torvum as a rootstock in the commercial

70 production of grafted eggplant , as well as in breeding programmes, is the poor, irregular and

71 erratic germination due to dormancy in seeds (Ginoux and Laterrot, 1991; Miura et al., 1993;

72 Gousset et al., 2005; Hayati et al., 2005). This characteristic has even led to the proposed use of

73 vegetative propagation to overcome the seed germination problem (Miceli et al., 2014). The

74 breaking of dormancy, which is a common phenomenon among wild Solanum species (Taab and

3

75 Andersson, 2009; Wei et al., 2010; Kandari et al., 2011; Tellier et al., 2011), and the enhancement

76 of germination can be achieved using combinations of many different physical (e.g., seed soaking,

77 manual scarification, cold stratification, heat shocks, light irradiation, and magnetic fields) and/or

78 chemical (e.g., scarification with acidic or basic chemicals, plant growth regulators, and osmotic

79 treatments) treatments (Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger, 2006; Bewley et al., 2013; Holubowicz

80 et al., 2014).

81 Determining the critical combination of factors that permit the enhancement of germination

82 in S. torvum seeds is important to develop improved protocols for seed germination in this species

83 for its use as a rootstock and for breeding purposes (Hayati et al., 2005; Gisbert et al., 2011a). The

84 influence of several potentially key factors affecting a variable, in this case seed germination, can

85 be determined by studying one factor at a time (as achieved by Hayati et al., 2005). However, this

86 process greatly reduces efficiency when there is an interdependency of factors or when it is

87 impractical to isolate and test each variable individually. Full factorial designs, which are much

88 more efficient in determining the optimal combination of factors, may require large and costly

89 experiments when many factors are involved (Onyiah, 2008; Rao et al., 2008). An alternative

90 commonly used in industrial applications are orthogonal (Taguchi) arrays (Roy, 2010), which allow

91 the main effects of a large number of factors to be estimated with a limited number of treatments.

92 Although orthogonal arrays have been successfully applied to address the problem of determining

93 adequate combinations of factors in biological and biotechnological processes (Rao et al., 2008;

94 Assemi et al., 2012; Sedghi et al., 2014; Vasilev et al., 2014), their use for establishing seed

95 germination protocols has been highly limited (Wu et al., 2011; Poinapen et al., 2013) and largely

96 overlooked.

97 In this work, we evaluate the primary effects of seven factors potentially involved in the

98 release from dormancy and enhancement of seed germination in dormant seeds of S. torvum using

99 an orthogonal array experimental design. The improved protocol established according to the results

100 was then tested and validated. The results from this work will provide information for improving

4

101 the seed germination of S. torvum. These findings will also contribute to facilitating its use as a

102 rootstock and as a source of variation in breeding programmes. At the same time, this work aims to

103 demonstrate the potential of orthogonal array designs for establishing efficient seed germination

104 protocols.

105

106 2. Materials and Methods

107

108 2.1. Seed materials and germination conditions

109

110 Fresh seeds of S. torvum accession No. 55953 (originally purchased from Sunshine Seeds,

111 Ahlen, Germany) were extracted from physiologically ripe fruits of plants cultivated in an open

112 field at Universitat Politècnica de València (Valencia, Spain). Five-month-old seeds of S.

113 melongena accession No. BBS-188/B (landrace from Ivory Coast), with high germination values

114 (>90%), were also used as a control for the validation of the improved treatment developed for the

115 germination of S. torvum seeds.

116 Depending on the experiment, seeds were germinated in Petri dishes (9.0 × 2.5 cm; Phoenix

117 Biomedical, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) on a layer of 0.5 cm of embedded hydrophilic cotton

118 covered by filter paper or sown at a depth of 7 mm in plastic pots (9 × 9 × 9.5 cm) containing

119 commercial nursery growing substrate (Neuhaus Huminsubstrat N3, Lassmann-Dellmann, Geeste,

120 Germany). Twenty-five evenly distributed seeds were placed in each Petri dish or pot. Seeds were

121 sown in Petri dishes and pots at the beginning of the experiments (day 0) in a climatic chamber with

122 a 14-h light / 10-h dark photoperiod at 25ºC constant temperature. A light irradiance of 600

123 mmol·m-2·s-1 was provided by GRO-LUX F36W/GRO (Sylvania, Danvers, MA, USA) fluorescent

124 tubes. The pots were watered regularly to keep the substrate moistened.

125

126 2.2. Factors evaluated

5

127

128 Seven factors, soaking, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), gibberellic acid (GA3), potassium

129 nitrate (KNO3), cold, heat, and light, with two possible levels (level 0, L0; level 1, L1) for each

130 factor were evaluated for their effects on the germination of S. torvum seeds. The levels for each

131 factor were as follows:

132 (a) Soaking: L0 = no soaking; L1 = soaking seeds in water for 1 d.

133 (b) NaClO: L0 = no NaClO scarification; L1 = NaClO scarification by the immersion of

134 seeds for 10 min in a 1.2% NaClO (SPB, Cheste, Spain) solution followed by the rinsing of seeds

135 with water.

136 (c) GA3: L0 = no GA3 application; L1 = soaking seeds in a 500 ppm solution of GA3

137 (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands) for 1 d.

138 (d) KNO3: L0 = use of water as a moistening agent (when using germination in Petri dishes)

139 or for watering (when using germination in growing substrate); L1 = use of a 1,000 ppm KNO3

140 (Panreac, Montcada i Reixac, Spain) solution as a moistening agent or as a watering solution.

141 (e) Cold; L0 = no cold stratification; L1 = seed stratification by placing moist seeds already

142 deposited on Petri dishes with a moistening agent or sown in seedling trays within a wet nursery

143 growing substrate at 4ºC for 7 d.

144 (f) Heat; L0 = no heat shock; L1 = placing moist seeds already deposited on Petri dishes

145 with a moistening agent or sown in seedling trays within a wet nursery growing substrate at 37ºC

146 for 1 d.

147 (g) Light: L0 = seeds placed in darkness (Petri dishes covered with aluminium foil); L1 =

148 seeds subjected to light irradiation (16 h of light at an intensity of 600 mmol·m-2·s-1 / 8 h dark).

149 The light factor was considered only for experiments involving the evaluation of

150 germination in Petri dishes. For the experiment involving sowing seeds in a commercial substrate,

151 all seeds were covered with a 7-mm layer of substrate.

6

152 The factors soaking, NaClO and GA3 were applied before sowing seeds on Petri dishes or in

153 the nursery growing substrate. The factors KNO3, cold and heat were applied after sowing seeds,

154 but before initiation of the evaluation of germination or emergence (day 0). The light factor was

155 applied at the initiation of the experiment (day 0). Factors were applied one after the other

156 according to the following order: (1) soaking, (2) NaClO, (3) GA3, (4) KNO3, (5) cold, (6) heat, and

157 (7) light. As L1 levels for some of the factors involve pre-germination procedures that may last up

158 to 7 days, their application was programmed so that the initiation of the evaluation of germination

159 or emergence (day 0) was synchronized for all treatments of a given experiment (Table 1).

160

161 2.3. Traits evaluated

162

163 Seed germination was evaluated at 0, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13 and 15 d after the seeds were placed in

164 the germination cabinet (day 0) for the first experiment (Petri dishes germination), which was aimed

165 at determining the levels of different factors for improving the germination of S. torvum. For the

166 experiments aimed at validating the improved treatment, the seed germination (Petri dishes) or

167 emergence (growing substrate) was evaluated at 0, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 d after the

168 seeds were placed in the germination cabinet (day 0). Seeds were considered germinated when the

169 radicle was 1 mm or greater. Emergence was evaluated by counting germinating seedlings.

170 The following four parameters were considered for an analysis of variance (ANOVA)

171 statistical evaluation (Ranal and Garcia de Santana, 2006): (a) early germination/emergence

172 (measured at 4 d or 5 d, depending on the germination experiment, and at 7 d for emergence; %);

173 (b) final germination/emergence (measured at 14 d or 15 d, depending on the experiment; %); (c)

174 germination/emergence rate, which determines the potential for a high final germination combined

175 with a rapid germination/emergence, calculated as (S1×t1 + S2×t2 + … + Sn×tn) / (t1 + t2 + … + tn),

176 where Sn is the cumulative percentage of germinated seeds at germination test n and tn is the

177 number of days at which test n was performed, expressed as a percentage (%); and, (d) vigour

7

178 index, which determines the potential for a rapid germination/emergence, calculated as

179 (S1/t1)+(S2/t2)+ … +(Sn/tn).

180

181 2.4. Establishing an improved seed germination treatment

182

7 183 The main effects of the seven factors studied at two levels were evaluated using an L8 (2 )

184 orthogonal array design (Roy, 2010) consisting of eight treatments (Table 1). These eight treatments

185 are orthogonal and each of the two levels (L0 and L1) for each factor is represented in the different

186 treatments the same number of times (four), of which for any factor one half (two) are evaluated at

187 level L0, and the other half (two) are evaluated at level L1 for any other factor. For each treatment,

188 six replicates (six Petri dishes, with 25 seeds per Petri dish) were used. Data on the four studied

189 parameters were transformed using the arcsine transformation (inverse sine of the square root of

190 percentage/100 for percentage data, and the proportion of the maximum possible value for the

191 vigour index) and subjected to an ANOVA for testing the significance of differences of the

192 treatments (Little and Hills, 1978). The significance of differences among the treatment means of

193 transformed data was evaluated in transformed data using the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple

194 range test at a P=0.05 (Hsu, 1996).

195 The degrees of freedom and sums of squares of the ANOVA for the eight treatments were

196 partitioned in seven orthogonal contrasts for testing the significance of the main effect (i.e., the

197 difference in the average between levels L0 and L1) for each factor (Little and Hills, 1978). Using

198 this information, we proposed an improved protocol for the germination of S. torvum by including

199 the level of each factor having a positive significant effect on the seed germination parameters

200 studied.

201

202 2.5. Validation of the improved germination treatment

203

8

204 A first experiment was performed to evaluate if the orthogonal array method had been

205 efficient in establishing an improved germination protocol under the experimental conditions (Petri

206 dish germination) used for developing it. To validate the method used to establish the improved

207 treatment we compared two treatments: (a) the proposed improved germination treatment according

208 to the results of the orthogonal array experiment and (b) the best treatment out of the eight tested in

209 the orthogonal array matrix. Six replicates (six Petri dishes, with 25 seeds per Petri dish) for each of

210 these two treatments were used. Analyses and significance of differences of transformed data were

211 performed by using an ANOVA as mentioned in section 2.4.

212 A second experiment was conducted to evaluate if the improved germination treatment

213 obtained with the orthogonal array method under experimental conditions (germination in Petri

214 dishes) was useful in improving the germination of S. torvum under commercial nursery conditions,

215 by evaluating the emergence of seeds sown in a nursery growing substrate. In this experiment, the

216 light factor had to be set at the level L0, as seeds were sown at a depth of 7 mm and germinated in

217 the dark in all cases. The three treatments evaluated were a) Solanum torvum control treatment (all

218 factors at level L0), b) the proposed improved germination treatment according to the results of the

219 orthogonal array experiment, and c) Solanum melongena control treatment (all factors at level L0).

220 Six replicates (six pots) for each of these three treatments were used. Data analyses and significance

221 of differences were performed by using an ANOVA with transformed data as mentioned in section

222 2.4.

223

224 3. Results

225

226 3.1. Establishing an improved seed germination treatment

227

228 Highly significant differences (P<0.0001) were observed in the ANOVA analysis among the

229 eight treatments (1 to 8) evaluated in the orthogonal array design for the four traits evaluated (Table

9

230 2). Treatments 5 and 6, which share levels L1 for soaking, L0 for NaClO and L1 for GA3 (Table 1),

231 had a high early germination, being significantly superior to the rest of the treatments (Figure 1).

232 For treatments 2, 3, and 4 an early germination of some seeds was observed, but no significant

233 differences were observed among them. The remaining treatments (1, 7, and 8) presented no

234 germination at 4 d (Figure 1). The highest final germination at the end of the experiment (15 d) was

235 found for treatments 2, 5 and 6 with average germination values above 99% and significantly higher

236 values than the other treatments (Figure 1). Intermediate germination values were recorded for

237 treatments 3, 4 and 8, with treatments 3 and 8 presenting significantly higher values than treatment

238 4. Finally, treatment 7 had a very low germination and treatment 1 no germination at all.

239 Observation of the seeds sown in Petri dishes applying treatments 1 and 7 did not reveal any further

240 germination even after 1 month.

241 The germination rate was highest (>98%) in treatments 5 and 6, which was significantly

242 higher than that of the rest of the treatments (Figure 1). The next treatment with the highest

243 germination rate was treatment 2, which was significantly higher than that of the treatments 3, 8 and

244 4. The lowest germination rate values were obtained for treatments 1 and 7 (Figure 1). The vigour

245 index followed a similar pattern as the germination rate, with the highest values being those in

246 treatments 5 and 6, and the lowest values coinciding with treatments 1 and 7. The significant groups

247 for the vigour index were identical to those observed for the germination rate (Figure 1).

248 The orthogonal contrasts obtained from the partition of the degrees of freedom and sums of

249 squares of the ANOVA for the treatments revealed that significant differences existed among the

250 average values for the two levels (L0 and L1) for all factors in the four parameters studied, with the

251 exception of the cold factor for the germination rate and vigour index (Table 2). The greatest F-

252 ratios (P<0.0001) for early germination were obtained for the orthogonal contrasts of GA3, NaClO

253 and soaking. The remaining orthogonal contrasts were significant at P<0.01. For the final

254 germination, all orthogonal contrasts were highly significant (P<0.0001) except for the cold factor

255 (P<0.01), with the highest values being those for light, KNO3, NaClO and GA3. For the germination

10

256 rate, all the orthogonal contrasts were highly significant (P<0.0001), except for cold (Table 2). The

257 highest F-ratio values were obtained for GA3, light, KNO3, and NaClO. For the vigour index, again

258 cold was non-significant, and the remaining orthogonal contrasts were highly significant

259 (P<0.0001), except for heat, which was significant at P<0.01 (Table 2).

260 The average values of level 1 (L1) were greater than those of level 0 (L0) for all factors

261 across the four parameters studied with the exception of the NaClO factor, in which the values were

262 greater for L0 (Table 3). For early germination, the highest L1-L0 absolute differences between

263 levels were for GA3, NaClO, and soaking, with values ≥40.0%. For the remaining factors these

264 differences were <5% (Table 3). In the case of late germination and germination rate, the greatest

265 differences between L1 and L0 were for the light, KNO3, NaClO, and GA factors. Finally, for the

266 vigour index, the greatest absolute differences were found for factors GA3, NaClO, soaking, and

267 light (Table 3).

268 Based on the results obtained from the orthogonal contrasts for the primary effects of each

269 factor tested and the average values for each of the levels of each factor, the following improved

270 germination treatment is proposed for enhancing S. torvum seed germination: soaking: L1, NaClO:

271 L0, GA3: L1, KNO3: L1, cold: L1, heat: L1, and light: L1 (Figure 1).

272

273 3.2. Validation of the improved germination treatment

274

275 The improved germination protocol proposed in section 3.1 was not among the treatments

276 tested in the orthogonal array design. To validate the proposed treatment for its germination in Petri

277 dishes, we compared it with treatment 6 of the orthogonal array design. Treatment 6, together with

278 treatment 5, was significantly superior to the other treatments for all the parameters studied (except

279 for the final germination of treatment 2, which did not differ significantly from treatments 5 and 6).

280 Treatment 6 was chosen over treatment 5, as the former had a slightly higher (although non-

281 significant) early germination (Figure 2). The improved treatment and treatment 6 differ in cold (L1

11

282 for the improved treatment and L0 for treatment 6) and light (L1 for the improved treatment and L0

283 for treatment 6) factors, with the remaining treatments applied at the same levels. No significant

284 differences were obtained between the improved treatment and treatment 6 for any of the

285 germination parameters studied (Table 4). The germination curves for both treatments are very

286 similar, although values for the improved treatment are higher (although not significantly different)

287 than those of treatment 6 (Figure 3). Germination occurred very quickly with more than 60% of the

288 seeds germinated at 3 d and a germination plateau achieved at 6 d (Figure 3).

289 Regarding validation of the proposed method in the nursery growing substrate, highly

290 significant differences (P<0.0001) were observed among the three treatments tested (S. torvum

291 control, S. torvum improved treatment, and S. melongena control) for the seed emergence traits

292 evaluated (Table 4). The seeds of S. torvum with the control treatment did not germinate (Table 5).

293 Solanum torvum seeds with the improved treatment had approximately 50% early emergence (at

294 day 7), which is significantly higher than that of the S. melongena control (Table 5). Conversely, the

295 final germination of the control seeds of S. melongena was significantly higher than that of the S.

296 torvum improved treatment. This resulted in a sharper sigmoidal curve in the S. melongena control

297 compared to the S. torvum improved treatment (Figure 4). Regarding the emergence rate, no

298 significant differences were observed between the S. melongena control and the S. torvum improved

299 protocol (Table 5). However, for the vigour index, the values for the S. torvum improved treatment

300 were significantly higher than those of the S. melongena control (Table 5). For both treatments,

301 germination reached a plateau in 10 d.

302

303 4. Discussion

304

305 Although S. torvum is considered to be an outstanding rootstock for the commercial

306 production of eggplant (Miceli et al., 2013; Moncada et al., 2014), its practical utilization is

307 hampered by dormancy and poor germination (Ginoux and Laterrot, 1991; Miura et al., 1993;

12

308 Hayati et al., 2005). The efficient and successful production of high-quality grafted vegetable plants

309 requires an adequate synchronization of the development of rootstock and scion plantlets, which

310 requires the predictable germination of both the rootstock and scion (Lee et al., 2010). In this

311 respect, the germination protocol described here, which involves the application of a combination of

312 different factors having a positive effect on the germination of dormant seeds of S. torvum, has

313 proved highly efficient in producing a reliable, rapid and uniform germination in this species.

314 The use of an L8 orthogonal array experimental design allows the main effects on S. torvum

315 seed germination to be determined for seven factors using only eight treatments in which factors are

316 arranged in an orthogonal matrix (Roy, 2010). A few studies use orthogonal arrays for improving

317 seed germination in other species by studying only three (Wu et al., 2011) or four factors (Poinapen

318 et al., 2013). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is conducted with the largest number

319 of factors evaluated for improving seed germination. Our results show that similar to industrial and

320 biotechnological processes (Rao et al., 2008; Roy, 2010), orthogonal arrays are robust, powerful

321 and simple tools for simultaneously studying the primary effects of a large number of factors to

322 improve seed germination protocols in horticultural species. The primary advantages of orthogonal

323 arrays for seed germination testing is that they are much more efficient than studying one variable at

324 a time, and they are much simpler and less costly than full factorial designs (Little and Hills, 1978;

325 Onyiah, 2008; Rao et al., 2008).

326 All factors included in this study are known to have a potential effect on seed germination

327 (Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger, 2006; Bewley et al., 2013). In the present orthogonal array

328 experiment, we observed that all of the factors had an effect, although of varying aspects and

329 magnitude, on the seed germination of S. torvum seeds. The factors that exhibited a larger effect on

330 different seed germination parameters studied were soaking, NaClO, GA3, KNO3 and light. In all

331 treatments, except for NaClO, level L1 (application of the physical or chemical treatment) had a

332 positive effect compared to level L0 (no application of the treatment) on breaking the dormancy of

333 S. torvum seeds and improving early and final germination, as well as on the germination rate and

13

334 vigour index. In this respect, seed soaking for 12 to 24 h is known to be an efficient means for

335 improving the germination of Solanum species (Hayati et al., 2005; Ahmed et al., 2006), as it may

336 remove seed germination inhibitors (Bewley et al., 2013). Similarly, applications of the plant

337 growth regulator GA3 or KNO3 are efficient at releasing Solanum seeds from dormancy and

338 stimulating germination (Hayati et al., 2005; Wei et al., 2010; Gisbert et al., 2011a). Light

339 irradiation, which is an important regulator of seed germination in solanaceous species (Koo et al.,

340 2015), has also been observed to be efficient at stimulating germination in S. torvum seeds.

341 Amazingly, the scarification by NaClO had a highly negative effect on germination. NaClO

342 treatments are used for seed disinfection, but they also promote germination in some Solanum

343 species (Prohens et al., 1999). NaClO affects seed coat properties (Prohens et al., 1999) and this

344 may affect water uptake or other physical properties of the seed, in this case negatively, germination

345 (Bewley et al., 2013). We suggest that other suitable methods, other than NaClO treatement, for

346 seed disinfection and scarification should be used for S. torvum. Cold and heat factors also

347 influenced the germination of S. torvum such that the application of cold stratification and a heat

348 shock stimulated germination, although to a lesser extent than the other factors. In other studies,

349 cold or heat treatments proved efficient for releasing seeds of wild Solanum species from dormancy

350 (Shalimu et al., 2012; Koo et al., 2015). In this respect, cold induces the transcription GA3 synthesis

351 genes (Penfield et al., 2005), whereas heat treatments result in the production of small heat-shock

352 proteins that stimulate germination (Koo et al., 2015).

353 Seeds of S. torvum presented strong physiological dormancy and did not germinate under

354 control conditions. This strong dormancy may be the underlying reason for the poor and irregular

355 germination problems of S. torvum, thus limiting its use as a rootstock (Ginoux and Laterrot, 1991;

356 Miura et al., 1993; Gousset et al., 2005; Hayati et al., 2005), as high and rapid germination was

357 recorded with some of the treatments tested in the orthogonal array design. Although some of the

358 treatments from the orthogonal array (e.g., treatments 5 and 6) provided excellent results with high

359 levels of early and final germination as well as a high germination rate, validation of the proposed

14

360 protocol is needed. The results of the comparison of the proposed improved method with the best

361 treatment of the orthogonal array (treatment 6) confirmed the potential of the orthogonal array

362 designs to determine an optimal combination of levels for each of the factors studied (Roy, 2010).

363 The evaluation of the improved protocol under conditions that simulate commercial nursery

364 conditions (Lee et al., 2010) involved sowing the seeds in the growing substrate. Obviously, under

365 these conditions the light irradiation treatment cannot be applied as seeds were covered by soil

366 during germination. In this case, we also recorded that the control seeds of S. torvum did not

367 germinate, confirming the strong dormancy in this species (Ginoux and Laterrot, 1991; Miura et al.,

368 1993; Gousset et al., 2005; Hayati et al., 2005). However, a rapid germination in comparison to the

369 non-treated S. melongena control, was obtained with the improved germination protocol. This result

370 is important, as it indicates that this developed protocol may be applied commercially in the

371 production of S. torvum plantlets as rootstocks for eggplant grafting. The slightly lower germination

372 success compared to the Petri dish experiment may be caused by a lack of light irradiation, the

373 different germination conditions, or both (Pensfield et al., 2005; Koo et al., 2015).

374

375 5. Conclusions

376

377 Fresh S. torvum seeds present a strong dormancy exhibiting no germination. The utilization

378 of an orthogonal array design has been highly successful for estimating the main effects of factors

379 affecting the seed germination of S. torvum seeds and for establishing an improved protocol for high

380 and rapid germination. We determined that certain treatments, such as seed soaking, GA3, KNO3,

381 and light irradiation, have highly positive effects in stimulating germination, whereas NaClO

382 scarification causes negative effects. Cold scarification and heat shock also increased seed

383 germination. The improved protocol results in a high and rapid germination under Petri dish and

384 nursery growing substrate conditions. The results are of importance for the increased utilization of

385 S. torvum as a rootstock for eggplant cultivation and for breeding programmes, and these findings

15

386 also demonstrate the utility of orthogonal arrays for establishing improved protocols for seed

387 germination involving many simultaneous factors.

388

389 Acknowledgments

390

391 This work was completed as part of the initiative "Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change:

392 Collecting, Protecting and Preparing Crop Wild Relatives", which is supported by the Government

393 of Norway. The project is managed by the Global Crop Diversity Trust with the Millennium Seed

394 Bank of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and is implemented in partnership with national and

395 international gene banks and plant breeding institutes. For further information see the project

396 website: http://www.cwrdiversity.org/. Isabel Andújar and Pietro Gramazio are grateful to

397 Universitat Politècnica de Valencia for their post-doctoral (PAID-10-14) and pre-doctoral

398 (Programa FPI de la UPV-Subprograma 1) contracts, respectively.

399

400 6. References

401

402 Ahmed, A.K., Johnson, K.A., Burchett, M.D., Kenny, B.J. 2006. The effects of heat, smoke,

403 leaching, scarification, temperature and NaCl salinity on the germination of Solanum

404 centrale (the Australian bush tomato). Seed Sci. Technol. 34, 33-45.

405 Arao, T., Takeda, H., Nishihara, E. 2008. Reduction of cadmium traslocation from roots to shoots in

406 eggplant (Solanum melongena) by grafting onto Solanum torvum rootstock. Soil Sci. Plant

407 Nutr. 54, 555-559.

408 Assemi, H., Rezapanah, M., Vafael-Shoushtari, R., Mehrvar, A. 2012. Modified artificial diet for

409 rearing of tobacco budworm, Helicoverpa armigera, using the Taguchi method and

410 Derringer’s desirability function. J. Insect Sci. 12, 100.

16

411 Bagnaresi, P., Sala, T., Irdani, T., Scotto, C., Lamontarana, A., Beretta, M., Rotino, G.L., Sestili, L.,

412 Sabatini, E. 2013. Solanum torvum responses to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne

413 incognita. BMC Genomics 14, 540.

414 Bewley, J.D., Bradford, K., Hilhorst, H., Nonogaki, H. 2013. Seeds: Physiology of development,

415 germination and dormancy, 3rd edition. Springer, New York.

416 Bletsos, F., Thanassoulopoulos, C., Roupakias, D. 2003. Effect of grafting on growth, yield and

417 verticillium wilt wilt of eggplant. HortScience 38, 183-186.

418 Finch-Savage, W.E., Leubner-Metzger, G. 2006. Seed dormancy and the control of germination.

419 New Phytol. 171, 501-523.

420 Ginoux, G., Laterrot, H. 1991. Greffage de l’aubergine: reflexions sur le choix du portegreffe. PHM

421 Revue Horticole 321, 49-54.

422 Gisbert, C., Prohens, J., Nuez, F. 2011a. Treatments for improving seed germination in eggplant

423 and related species. Acta Hort. 898, 45-51.

424 Gisbert, C., Prohens, J., Raigón, M.D., Stommel, J.R., Nuez, F. 2011b. Eggplant wild relatives as

425 sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: effects of grafting on eggplant yield and

426 fruit apparent quality and composition. Sci. Hort. 128, 14-22.

427 Gousset, C., Collonnier, C., Mulya, K., Mariska, I., Rotino, G.L., Besse, P., Servaes, A., Sihachakr,

428 D. 2005. Solanum torvum, as a useful source of resistance against bacterial and fungal

429 diseases for improvement of eggplant (S. melongena L.). Plant Sci. 168, 319-327.

430 Hayati, N.E., Sukprakarn, S., Juntakool, S. 2005. Seed germination enhancement in Solanum

431 stramonifolium and Solanum torvum. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 39, 368-376.

432 Holubowicz, R., Kubisz, L., Gauza, M., Tong, Y., Hojan-Jezierska, D. 2014. Effect of low

433 frequency magnetic field (LFMF) on the germination of seeds and useful characters of onion

434 (Allium cepa L.). Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. 42, 168-172.

435 Hsu, J.C. 1996. Multiple comparisons: theory and methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton,

436 Florida, USA.

17

437 Kandari, L.S., Kulkami, M.G., Van Staden, J. 2011. Effect of nutrients and smoke solutions on seed

438 germination and seedling growth of tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum). Weed Sci. 59,

439 470-475.

440 Koo, H.J., Park, S.M., Kim, K.P., Suh, M.C., Lee, M.O., Lee, S.K., Xinli, X., Hong, C.B. 2015.

441 Small heat shock proteins can release light dependence of tobacco seed during germination.

442 Plant Physiol. 167, 1030-1038.

443 Kumchai, J., Wei, Y.C., Lee, C.Y., Chen, F.C., Chin, S.W. 2013. Production of interspecific

444 hybrids between commercial cultivars of the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and its wild

445 relative S. torvum. Genet. Mol Res. 12, 755-764.

446 Lee, J.M., Kubota, C., Tsao, S.J., Bie, Z., Hoyos Echevarria, P., Morra, L., Oda, M. 2010. Current

447 status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Sci. Hort. 127, 93-

448 105.

449 Levin, R.A., Myers, N.R., Bohs, L. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among the “spiny

450 (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, ). Amer. J. Bot. 93, 157-169.

451 Little, T. Hills, J. 1978. Agricultural experimentation: design and analysis. Wiley, New York.

452 Miceli, A., Sabatino, L., Moncada, A., Vetrano, F., D’Anna, F. 2014. Nursery and field evaluation

453 of eggplant grafted onto unrooted cuttings of Solanum torvum Sw. Sci. Hort. 178, 203-210.

454 Miura, H., Yoshida, M., Yamasaki, A. 1993. Improved emergence of Solanum torvum by seed

455 treatment. HortScience 28, 529.

456 Moncada, A., Miceli, A., Vetrano, F., Mineo, V., Planeta, D., D’Anna, F. 2013. Effect of grafting

457 on yield and qaulaity of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Sci. Hort. 149, 108-114.

458 Nyadanu, D., Lowor, S.T. 2015. Promoting competitiveness of neglected and underutilized crops

459 species: comparative analysis of nutritional composition of indigenous and exotic leafy and

460 fruit vegetables in Ghana. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 62, 131-140.

461 Onyiah, L.C. 2008. Design and analysis of experiments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

18

462 Penfield, S., Josse, E.M., Kannangara, R., Gilday, A.D., Halliday, K.J., Graham, I.A. 2005. Cold

463 and light control seed germination through the bHLH transcription factor SPATULA. Curr.

464 Biol. 15, 1998-2006.

465 Poinapen, D., Brown, D.C.W., Beeharry, G.K. 2013. Seed orientation and magnetic field strength

466 have more influence on tomato seed performance than relative humidity and duration of

467 exposure to non-uniform static magnetic fields. J. Plant Physiol. 170, 1251-1258.

468 Prohens, J., Soler, S., Nuez, F. 1999. The effects of thermotherapy and sodium hypochlorite

469 treatments on pepino seed germination, a crucial step in breeding programmes. Ann. Appl.

470 Biol. 134, 299-305.

471 Ranal, M.A, Garcia de Santana, D. 2006. How and why to measure the germination process?.

472 Revista Brasil. Bot. 29, 1-11.

473 Rao, R.S., Kumar, C.G., Prakasham, R.S., Hobbs, P.J. 2008. The Taguchi methodology as a

474 statistical tool for biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. J. 3, 510-523.

475 Roy, R.K. 2010. A primer of the Taguchi method. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn,

476 Michigan, USA.

477 Savvas, D., Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Schwarz, D. 2010. Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient

478 stress in fruit vegetables by grafting. Sci. Hort. 127, 156-161.

479 Schwarz, D., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Venema, J.H. 2010. Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of

480 vegetables to abiotic stresses: Thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci. Hort.

481 127, 162-171.

482 Sedghi, M., Golian, A., Esmaeilipour, O., Van Krimpen, M.M. 2014. Application of the Taguchi

483 method in poultry science: estimation of the in vitro optimum intrinsic phytase activity of

484 rye, wheat and barley. Br. Poult. Sci. 55, 246-252.

485 Shalimu, D., Qiu, J., Tan, D.Y., Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M. 2012. Seed biology of the invasive

486 species buffalobur (Solanum rostratum) in Northwest China. Weed Sci. 60, 219-224.

19

487 Taab, A., Andersson, L. 2009. Seed dormancy dinamics and germination characteristics of Solanum

488 nigrum. Weed Res. 49, 490-498.

489 Tellier, A., Laurent, S.J.Y., Lainer, H., Pavlidis, P., Stephan, W. 2011. Inference of seed bank

490 parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data. Proc. Natl. Acad.

491 Sci. USA 108, 17052-17057.

492 Vasilev, N., Schmitz, C., Grömping, U., Fischer, R., Schillberg, S. 2014. Assessment of cultivation

493 factors that affect biomass and geraniol production in transgenic tobacco suspension cells.

494 PLOS ONE 9, e104620.

495 Wei, S., Zhang, C., Chen, X., Li, X., Sui, B., Huang, H., Cui, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Guo, F. 2010.

496 Rapid and effective methods for breaking seed dormancy in buffalobur (Solanum

497 rostratum). Weed Sci. 58, 141-146.

498 Wu, C., Wang, Q., Xie, B., Wang, Z., Cui, J., Hu, T. 2011. Effects of drought and salt stress on seed

499 germination of three leguminous species. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 17954-17961.

20

500 Table 1

7 501 L8 orthogonal array matrix (2 ) for the seven factors evaluated (soaking, NaClO, GA3, KNO3, cold,

502 heat, and light) at two levels (L0 and L1), indicating the levels applied to each of the eight

503 treatments tested.

Factors Day of

a Treatment Soaking NaClO GA3 KNO3 Cold Heat Light initiation

1 L0 L0 L0 L0 L0 L0 L0 0

2 L0 L0 L0 L1 L1 L1 L1 -8

3 L0 L1 L1 L0 L0 L1 L1 -2

4 L0 L1 L1 L1 L1 L0 L0 -8

5 L1 L0 L1 L0 L1 L0 L1 -9

6 L1 L0 L1 L1 L0 L1 L0 -3

7 L1 L1 L0 L0 L1 L1 L0 -9

8 L1 L1 L0 L1 L0 L0 L1 -1

504 a Beginning day of the application of the different levels so that the initiation (day 0) of the

505 germination experiment is synchronized.

506

21

507 Table 2

508 Degrees of freedom, the F-ratio and its probability obtained from the ANOVA analyses for the effects of treatments and for the orthogonal

509 comparisons between the two levels for each factor tested on the Solanum torvum seed germination parameters.

Sources of Degrees of Early germination (4 d; %) Final germination (15 d; %) Germination rate (%) Vigour index

variation freedom F-ratio Prob. F F-ratio Prob. F F-ratio Prob. F F-ratio Prob. F

Treatments 7 157.5 <0.0001 238.0 <0.0001 228.8 <0.0001 235.8 <0.0001

Orthogonal contrasts

Soaking 1 202.5 <0.0001 76.9 <0.0001 149.1 <0.0001 237.9 <0.0001

NaClO 1 402.2 <0.0001 318.3 <0.0001 271.0 <0.0001 329.2 <0.0001

GA3 1 463.7 <0.0001 277.7 <0.0001 447.6 <0.0001 617.2 <0.0001

KNO3 1 9.2 0.0043 369.3 <0.0001 272.9 <0.0001 175.3 <0.0001

Cold 1 8.2 0.0066 8.2 0.0067 0.3 0.6105 0.0 0.9362

Heat 1 8.8 0.0051 54.0 <0.0001 23.5 <0.0001 12.5 0.0011

Light 1 7.8 0.0079 561.8 <0.0001 437.4 <0.0001 278.7 <0.0001

510

22

511 Table 3

512 Average values of the Solanum torvum seed germination parameters for the two levels (level 0, L0; level 1, L1) of the different factors evaluated

513 and the differences between L1 and L0 ( L1-L0).

Early germination (4 d; %) Final germination (15 d; %) Germination rate (%) Vigour index

Factors L0 L1  L1-L0a L0 L1  L1-L0 L0 L1  L1-L0 L0 L1  L1-L0

Soaking 8.2 48.2 40.0** 48.3 67.3 19.0** 42.6 65.0 22.4** 23.7 46.1 22.4**

NaClO 52.0 4.3 -47.7** 74.7 41.0 -33.7** 70.6 37.0 -33.6** 49.1 20.7 -28.4**

GA3 3.8 52.5 48.7** 42.7 73.0 30.3** 36.6 71.0 34.4** 19.1 50.7 31.6**

KNO3 26.3 30.0 3.7* 39.8 75.8 36.0** 38.5 69.2 30.7** 26.9 42.8 15.9**

Cold 26.5 29.8 3.3* 57.2 58.5 1.3* 53.7 53.9 0.2ns 34.8 34.9 0.1ns

Heat 26.0 30.3 4.3* 50.8 64.8 14.0** 48.0 59.6 11.6** 31.8 38.0 6.2*

Light 26.2 30.2 4.0* 33.5 82.2 48.7** 32.8 74.8 42.0** 23.9 45.9 22.0**

514 a**,*, ns indicate, respectively, significant at P<0.0001, P<0.01 or non-significant (see Table 2).

23

515 Table 4

516 F-ratio and its probability obtained from the ANOVA analyses for the seed germination parameters

517 resulting from the comparisons between the two treatments for Solanum torvum seed germination in

518 Petri dishes, and between the three treatments for Solanum torvum and S. melongena seed

519 germination in a commercial nursery growing substrate.

Petri dishes experimenta Commercial substrate experimentb

Parameter F-ratio Prob. F F-ratio Prob. F

Early germination 0.25 0.6309 48.26 <0.0001

Final germination 2.32 0.1586 424.37 <0.0001

Germination rate 2.06 0.1818 631.93 <0.0001

Vigour index 1.00 0.3407 551.07 <0.0001

520 a Germination treatments consisting of: (a) the optimal combination of factors of S. torvum

521 (soaking: L1; NaClO: L0; GA3: L1; KNO3: L1; cold: L1; heat: L1; light: L1) according to the

522 results obtained in the L8 orthogonal array design; (b) the best treatment of S. torvum (treatment 6;

523 soaking: L1; NaClO: L0; GA3: L1; KNO3: L1; cold: L0; heat: L1; light: L0) out of the eight tested

524 in the orthogonal array design matrix.

525 b Germination treatments consisting of: (a) the improved treatment of S. torvum consisting of the

526 optimal combination of factors (soaking: L1; NaClO: L0; GA3: L1; KNO3: L1; cold: L1; heat: L1)

527 according to the results obtained in the L8 orthogonal array design; (b) S. torvum control treatment

528 (soaking: L0; NaClO: L0; GA3: L0; KNO3: L0; cold: L0; heat: L0); (c) S. melongena control

529 treatment (soaking: L0; NaClO: L0; GA3: L0; KNO3: L0; cold: L0; heat: L0). The light factor was

530 not tested as the seeds were covered by a 7-mm layer of substrate.

24

531 Table 5

532 Average values and comparison of means for the seed emergence parameters between the three

533 treatments for Solanum torvum and S. melongena seed germination in a commercial nursery

534 growing substrate.

Treatmenta Early emergence Final emergence Emergence rate Vigour index

(7 d; %)b (14 d; %) (%)

S. torvum control 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a

S. torvum improved 49.3 c 77.3 b 60.8 b 52.6 c

S. melongena control 14.0 b 95.3 c 63.6 b 45.9 b

a 535 S. torvum control = soaking: L0; NaClO: L0; GA3: L0; KNO3: L0; cold: L0; heat: L0. S. torvum

536 improved = soaking: L1; NaClO: L0; GA3: L1; KNO3: L1; cold: L1; heat: L1. S. melongena control

537 = soaking: L0; NaClO: L0; GA3: L0; KNO3: L0; cold: L0; heat: L0. The light factor was not tested

538 as the seeds were covered by a 7-mm layer of substrate.

539 b Means separated by different letters are significantly different according to the Student-Newman-

540 Keuls multiple range test at P<0.05.

541

25

Soaking seeds in water (1 d)

Soaking seeds in GA3 (500 ppm) (1 d)

Sowing and watering with KNO3 (1000 ppm)

Cold stratification (4ºC) (7 d)

Heat shock (37º C) (1 d)

Germination with a 16 h light (25ºC) / 8 h dark (18º C) photoperiod 542 543 Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the improved protocol for enhancing S. torvum seed

544 germination.

26

c d dd 100 A c 100 B 90 90

80 80 c (%) (%)

70 70 c 60 60 50 50 b germination germination

40 40 30 30 Final Early 20 b 20 b b 10 10 a aa a a 0 0 12345678 12345678 Treatments Treatments

ee 100 C 100 D 90 d 90 80 80 e e

(%) 70 70 c c

rate 60 60

index 50 50 d 40 b 40 Vigour c c

Germination 30 30 b 20 20 10 10 a a a a 0 0 12345678 12345678 Treatments Treatments 545 546 Fig. 2. Effect of the eight treatments tested in the L8 orthogonal array design on the four seed

547 germination parameters: (A) early germination (4 d; upper left); (B) final germination (15 d; upper

548 right); (C) germination rate (lower left); and, (D) vigour index (lower right). Bars represent the

549 standard error (SE). Means separated by different letters are significantly different according to the

550 Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test at P<0.05.

27

100 90 80 70 (%) 60 50 40

Germination 30 20 10 0 01234567891011121314 Days 551 552 Fig. 3. Solanum torvum germination curves for two treatments: a) the improved

553 treatment consisting of the optimal combination of factors (soaking = 1; NaClO = 0;

554 GA3 = 1; KNO3 = 1; cold = 1; heat = 1; light = 1) according to the results obtained in

555 the L8 orthogonal array design results (continuous line, black circles); and, b) the best

556 treatment (treatment 6; soaking = 1; NaClO = 0; GA3 = 1; KNO3 = 1; cold = 0; heat = 1;

557 light = 0) out of the eight tested in the orthogonal array design matrix (dashed line,

558 white circles). Bars represent the standard error (SE).

559

28

100 90 80 70 (%) 60 50 40

Emergence 30 20 10 0 01234567891011121314 Days 560 561 Fig. 4. Emergence curves for Solanum torvum and S. melongena sown in a commercial

562 nursery growing substrate for three treatments: a) S. torvum control treatment (soaking

563 = 0; NaClO = 0; GA3 = 0; KNO3 = 0; cold = 0; heat = 0) (continuous line, black

564 circles); b) S. torvum improved treatment consisting of the optimal combination of

565 factors (soaking = 1; NaClO = 0; GA3 = 1; KNO3 = 1; cold = 1; heat = 1) according to

566 the results obtained in the L8 orthogonal array design (continuous line, grey circles);

567 and, c) S. melongena control treatment (soaking = 0; NaClO = 0; GA3 = 0; KNO3 = 0;

568 cold = 0; heat = 0) (dashed line, white circles). The light factor was not tested as the

569 seeds were covered by a 7-mm layer of substrate. Bars represent the standard error (SE).

29