DOCSLIB.ORG

Views Clear, As He Well Knows, When We and Women Being Thrown Out, What Effects Does the Publish the Draft Bill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Views Clear, As He Well Knows, When We and Women Being Thrown Out, What Effects Does the Publish the Draft Bill Tuesday Volume 521 18 January 2011 No. 100 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 18 January 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 679 18 JANUARY 2011 680 The Deputy Prime Minister: If we needed any House of Commons confirmation, this week of all weeks, that the Labour party’s commitment to cleaning up politics and political reform is a complete and utter farce—the leader of the Tuesday 18 January 2011 Labour party who, sadly, is not in his place, was going around the television studios last weekend saying that The House met at half-past Two o’clock he believed in new politics and that he wanted to reach out to Liberal Democrat voters—it is the dinosaurs in the Labour party in the House of Lords who are PRAYERS blocking people’s ability to have a say on the electoral system that they want. There cannot be meaningful political reform with such weak political leadership. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (LD): One hundred years after the temporary provisions of the Parliament Act 1911 were introduced, some of us are impatient for Oral Answers to Questions my right hon. Friend to succeed in achieving an elected second Chamber. Can he reassure me that the grandfathering of voting rights will not be offered to newly appointed peers under the present Government? DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER The Deputy Prime Minister: The specific reference to grandfathering in the coalition agreement applies to the The Deputy Prime Minister was asked— staged way in which we want reform of the House of Lords implemented over time. We want to be clear House of Lords Reform about the end point, which is a fully reformed House of Lords, but the stages by which we get there should be 1. Dr Julian Lewis (New Forest East) (Con): What subject to proper scrutiny and proper debate, and will process he plans to follow to develop and implement be, not least in the Joint Committee, when we publish proposals for a wholly or mainly elected second Chamber. the draft Bill, which we will do fairly shortly. [33928] Sadiq Khan (Tooting) (Lab): The Deputy Prime Minister The Deputy Prime Minister (Mr Nick Clegg): Iam has got himself a reputation as an habitual breaker of chairing a cross-party Committee to look at all aspects promises. May I ask him a simple and straightforward of House of Lords reform. We plan to publish a draft question, to which I hope he will give a simple and Bill in the coming period for pre-legislative scrutiny straightforward answer? In his draft Bill on the House by—we hope—a Joint Committee of both Houses. Then of Lords to be published shortly, will he keep his it will be for the Government to decide on the introduction promise of a 100% elected second Chamber? of the Bill. The Deputy Prime Minister: As the right hon. Gentleman Dr Lewis: Given that an all-elected upper House knows—he is a member of the very Committee that I would, in effect, double the number of MPs while have been chairing—that issue is still under discussion. resulting in hundreds of highly skilled and eminent men We will make our views clear, as he well knows, when we and women being thrown out, what effects does the publish the draft Bill. He talks about promises. Is that Deputy Prime Minister think will be applied to the the equivalent of the promise to hold a referendum on legislative process as a result of this brilliant idea? Will the alternative vote—a manifesto commitment made by it lead to greater effectiveness, greater prestige or just his party, which is now being blocked by the Labour more machine politics? party in the other place? The Deputy Prime Minister: My own view, as someone Parliamentary Constituencies who has always supported greater democracy in the other place and greater accountability to the British 2. Bob Blackman (Harrow East) (Con): When he people, is that the legitimacy of the other place would expects his proposals for fewer and more equally sized be enhanced. There are plenty of other bicameral constituencies to be implemented. [33929] democracies around the world that have two elected Chambers of different size with different mandates, The Deputy Prime Minister (Mr Nick Clegg): The elected even by different systems, which work extremely Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill well in striking the right balance between effectiveness currently being considered, if somewhat stalled by the and legitimacy. Labour party in another place, requires the boundary commissions to submit their reports before 1 October 2013. Mr David Winnick (Walsall North) (Lab): Of course, The Secretary of State or the Lord President is required it was the previous Labour Government who made sure to lay before Parliament an Order in Council to bring that the large majority of hereditary peers were removed— the commissions’ recommendations into effect. nearly 700—from the House of Lords. Has the Deputy Prime Minister any words of congratulations for Members Bob Blackman: The majority of this House will certainly of the current House of Lords on the way in which they condemn the delays not only in this Chamber but in the are defending democracy against gerrymandering? other place. Does my right hon. Friend agree that that 681 Oral Answers18 JANUARY 2011 Oral Answers 682 demonstrates the Opposition’s contempt for equal-sized Chris Bryant: It is not incurring more. constituencies and equal votes for people throughout the country? The Deputy Prime Minister: It is the choice of the coalition Government to say that we want to reform The Deputy Prime Minister: As I said earlier, the politics not in a piecemeal fashion, but in a meaningful leader of the Labour party said this very weekend that way. To introduce both the right for people to have a say he believed in new politics and political reform, yet he over the electoral system and to ensure that constituencies cannot control members of his own party in the House are of roughly the same size seems a perfectly sensible of Lords. Either he did not mean what he said at the way to proceed. That is what we will do, and I do not weekend, or he is too weak to lead his own party. Either think that the hon. Gentleman should be whipping up way, the Labour party cannot be relied upon to deliver the dinosaurs in the Labour party in the other place to political reform. stop us from doing so. Mr Ben Bradshaw (Exeter) (Lab): Many reform-minded Members of this House are getting fed up with the right Act of Settlement hon. Gentleman’s attitude to electoral reform. He has broken so many promises in the coalition agreement, so 3. Alex Cunningham (Stockton North) (Lab): What why does he not separate the date of the referendum on recent discussions he has had with ministerial the alternative vote from the gerrymandering that his colleagues on reform of the Act of Settlement. [33932] Government are putting through? The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Mr Mark The Deputy Prime Minister: We want to hold the Harper): I have had no recent discussions with ministerial referendum as soon as possible. We think that it is right colleagues on reforming the Act of Settlement. to hold it when people are going to the ballot box anyway. That will save the taxpayer £30 million. We Alex Cunningham: I am no monarchist, but does the think that that is the right way to proceed. We on the hon. Gentleman agree with me that, if we must have a Government Benches do not agree on the issue of AV, monarchy, women should have equality with men in but at least we agree that the British people should have succession? their say—something that the Labour party is now trying to block. Mr Harper: Ministers have already accepted that the Paul Uppal (Wolverhampton South West) (Con): My provision in the Act of Settlement might well be constituency is one of the smallest English seats. If I discriminatory, and I have already confirmed at the adhered to the principle of naked self-interest, I would Dispatch Box when responding to a previous debate, be supporting the status quo. Is it not right that we have not that we are doing nothing, but that discussions are equal-sized constituencies—equality for all voters so under way with other countries of which Her Majesty is that each vote has equal value? Queen. She is not just our Queen, but Queen of 15 other realms, and those matters have to be taken forward The Deputy Prime Minister: Of course it is. It has together in a careful and considered way. It is not as been a principle for political and democratic reformers straightforward as the hon. Gentleman would like to of all parties for generations that all votes should be pretend it is. valued in the same way. It simply cannot be right, for instance, that right now Islington North has an electorate Keith Vaz (Leicester East) (Lab): I welcome that of just over 66,000, and yet 10 miles away in East Ham response. As the Minister knows, my ten-minute rule the figure is 87,000. Voters in a constituency just 10 miles Bill on that subject is to be introduced at 3.30 pm today.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASE NOTE This Is a Draft Paper Only and Should Not Be Cited Without
    PLEASE NOTE This is a draft paper only and should not be cited without the author’s express permission THE SHORT-TERM IMPACT OF THE >GLORIOUS REVOLUTION= ON THE ENGLISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM On February 14, 1689, The day after William and Mary were recognized by the Convention Parliament as King and Queen, the first members of their Privy Council were sworn in. And, during the following two to three weeks, all of the various high offices in the government and the royal household were filled. Most of the politically powerful posts went either to tories or to moderates. The tory Earl of Danby was made Lord President of the Council and another tory, the Earl of Nottingham was made Secretary of State for the Southern Department. The office of Lord Privy Seal was given to the Atrimming@ Marquess of Halifax, whom dedicated whigs had still not forgiven for his part in bringing about the disastrous defeat of the exclusion bill in the Lords= house eight years earlier. Charles Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, who was named Principal Secretary of State, can really only be described as tilting towards the whigs at this time. But, at the Admiralty and the Treasury, both of which were put into commission, in each case a whig stalwart was named as the first commissioner--Lord Mordaunt and Arthur Herbert respectivelyBand also in each case a number of other leading whigs were named to the commission as well.i Whig lawyers, on the whole, did rather better than their lay fellow-partisans. Devonshire lawyer and Inner Temple Bencher Henry Pollexfen was immediately appointed Attorney- General, and his cousin, Middle Templar George Treby, Solicitor General.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Evidence: Evidence from the Prime Minister, HC 712 Tuesday 12 January 2016
    Liaison Committee Oral evidence: Evidence from the Prime Minister, HC 712 Tuesday 12 January 2016 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 12 January 2016 Watch the meeting Members present: Mr Andrew Tyrie (Chair), Sir Paul Beresford, Mr Clive Betts, Crispin Blunt, Andrew Bridgen, Ms Harriet Harman, Meg Hillier, Huw Irranca-Davies, Dr Julian Lewis, Mr Angus Brendan MacNeil, Jesse Norman, Mr Laurence Robertson, Neil Parish, Keith Vaz, Bill Wiggin Questions 1–108 Witness: Rt Hon David Cameron MP, Prime Minister, gave evidence. Q1 Chair: Good afternoon, Prime Minister. Thank you very much for coming to give evidence to the first of the Liaison Committee’s public meetings in this Session. First of all, I want to establish that you are going to continue the practice of the last Parliament and appear three times a Session. Mr Cameron: Yes, if we all agree. I thought last time it worked quite well to have three sessions: one in this bit, one between Easter and summer, and one later in the year. This idea of picking some subjects, to be determined by you, rather than going across the piece—I am happy either way, but I think it worked okay. Q2 Chair: We have a problem for this Session, because we have a bit of a backlog. We tried to get you before Christmas but that was not possible, so we would be very grateful if you could make two more appearances this Session. Mr Cameron: Yes, that sounds right—one between Easter and summer recess, and one— Q3 Chair: I think it will be two before the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND REGISTRATION for the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY a Conveyancing Revolution
    LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND COMMENTARY Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 July 2001 LAW COMMISSION H M LAND REGISTRY LAW COM NO 271 LONDON: The Stationery Office HC 114 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. THE COMMISSIONERS ARE: The Honourable Mr Justice Carnwath CVO, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale Mr Stuart Bridge· Professor Martin Partington Judge Alan Wilkie QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers Her Majesty’s Land Registry, a separate department of government and now an Executive Agency, maintains the land registers for England and Wales and is responsible for delivering all land registration services under the Land Registration Act 1925. The Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive is Mr Peter Collis The Solicitor to H M Land Registry is Mr Christopher West The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk · Mr Stuart Bridge was appointed Law Commissioner with effect from 2 July 2001. The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001, while Mr Charles Harpum was a Law Commissioner. ii LAW COMMISSION HM LAND REGISTRY LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY- FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: THE LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette
    . 40662 7209 The London Gazette Registered as a Newspaper For Table of Contents see last page * * FRIDAY, 23 DECEMBER, 1955 Westminster, 21st December, 1955. Crown Office, House of Lords, S.W.I. This day, the Lords being met, a message was sent 22nd December, 1955. to the Honourable House of Commons, by the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, acquainting The QUEEN has been pleased by Letters Patent them that The Lords authorised by virtue of a under the Great Seal bearing date the 22nd day Commission under the Great Seal, signed by Her of December, 1955, to appoint the Right Honour- Majesty, for declaring Her Royal Assent to the Acts able Richard Austen Butler, C.H., to be Keeper of agreed upon by both Houses, to desire the Her Majesty's Privy Seal. immediate attendance of the Honourable House in the House of Peers to hear the Commission read, .and the Commons being come thither, the said Commission, empowering the Lord Archbishop of Crown Office, House of Lords, S.W.I. Canterbury, and several other Lords therein named, 22nd December, 1955. to declare and notify the Royal Assent to the said Acts, was read accordingly, and the Royal Assent The QUEEN has been pleased by Letters Patent given to:— under the Great Seal bearing date the 22nd day of December, 1955, to appoint the Right Honour- Finance (No. 2) Act, 1955, able Maurice Harold Macmillan to be Chancellor Aliens' Employment Act, 1955. Friendly Societies Act, 1955. and Under Treasurer of Her Majesty's Exchequer. Agriculture (Improvement of Roads) Act, 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • © 2015 Robert Daiutolo, Jr. All RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2015 Robert Daiutolo, Jr. All RIGHTS RESERVED GEORGE CROGHAN: THE LIFE OF A CONQUEROR by ROBERT DAIUTOLO, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School—New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Jan Lewis and approved by _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION George Croghan: The Life of a Conqueror By ROBERT DAIUTOLO, JR. Dissertation Director: Jan Lewis This dissertation integrates my own specifying paradigm of “situational frontier” and his- torian David Day’s generalizing paradigm of “supplanting society” to contextualize one historical personage, George Croghan, who advanced the interests of four eighteenth-cen- tury supplanting societies—one nation (Great Britain) and three of its North American colonies (Pennsylvania, New York, and Virginia)—in terms of three fields of endeavor, trade, diplomacy, and proprietorship. Croghan was an Irish immigrant who, during his working life on the “situational frontiers” of North America, mastered the intricacies of intercultural trade and diplomacy. His mastery of both fields of endeavor enabled him not only to create advantageous conditions for the governments of the three colonies to claim proprietorship of swaths of Indian land, but also to create advantageous conditions for himself to do likewise. The loci of his and the three colonies’ claims were the “situa- tional frontiers” themselves, the distinct spaces where particular Indians, Europeans, and Euro-Americans converged in particular circumstances and coexisted, sometimes peace- fully and sometimes violently. His mastery of intercultural trade and diplomacy enabled him as well to create advantageous conditions for Great Britain to claim proprietorship in the Old Northwest (present-day Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Illinois) and for himself to do likewise.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Kinnock MP Aberav
    Member Name Constituency Bespoke Postage Total Spend £ Spend £ £ (Incl. VAT) (Incl. VAT) Stephen Kinnock MP Aberavon 318.43 1,220.00 1,538.43 Kirsty Blackman MP Aberdeen North 328.11 6,405.00 6,733.11 Neil Gray MP Airdrie and Shotts 436.97 1,670.00 2,106.97 Leo Docherty MP Aldershot 348.25 3,214.50 3,562.75 Wendy Morton MP Aldridge-Brownhills 220.33 1,535.00 1,755.33 Sir Graham Brady MP Altrincham and Sale West 173.37 225.00 398.37 Mark Tami MP Alyn and Deeside 176.28 700.00 876.28 Nigel Mills MP Amber Valley 489.19 3,050.00 3,539.19 Hywel Williams MP Arfon 18.84 0.00 18.84 Brendan O'Hara MP Argyll and Bute 834.12 5,930.00 6,764.12 Damian Green MP Ashford 32.18 525.00 557.18 Angela Rayner MP Ashton-under-Lyne 82.38 152.50 234.88 Victoria Prentis MP Banbury 67.17 805.00 872.17 David Duguid MP Banff and Buchan 279.65 915.00 1,194.65 Dame Margaret Hodge MP Barking 251.79 1,677.50 1,929.29 Dan Jarvis MP Barnsley Central 542.31 7,102.50 7,644.81 Stephanie Peacock MP Barnsley East 132.14 1,900.00 2,032.14 John Baron MP Basildon and Billericay 130.03 0.00 130.03 Maria Miller MP Basingstoke 209.83 1,187.50 1,397.33 Wera Hobhouse MP Bath 113.57 976.00 1,089.57 Tracy Brabin MP Batley and Spen 262.72 3,050.00 3,312.72 Marsha De Cordova MP Battersea 763.95 7,850.00 8,613.95 Bob Stewart MP Beckenham 157.19 562.50 719.69 Mohammad Yasin MP Bedford 43.34 0.00 43.34 Gavin Robinson MP Belfast East 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paul Maskey MP Belfast West 0.00 0.00 0.00 Neil Coyle MP Bermondsey and Old Southwark 1,114.18 7,622.50 8,736.68 John Lamont MP Berwickshire Roxburgh
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Orders Proceedings of the House of Lords
    HOUSE OF LORDS COMPANION TO THE STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDE TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2007 PREFACE This is the 21st edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The House and its procedures have changed much in recent years, and continue to do so. This edition of the Companion reflects two particularly significant changes. First, on 4 July 2006 for the first time the House elected a Lord Speaker. Secondly, the Minutes of Proceedings have been replaced by the new publication House of Lords Business from the start of session 2006-07. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. Others are the Handbook on facilities and services, booklets on participation in legislative business (from the Public Bill Office) and the General Guide to the Members’ Reimbursement Allowance Scheme (from the Finance Department). All such guidance is available on line. The Table Clerks and procedural offices are always available to advise members. PAUL HAYTER Clerk of the Parliaments i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: THE HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP ........................1 Composition of the House.......................................................................1 Disqualification for membership.............................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Prime Minister, HC 1393
    Liaison Committee Oral evidence: The Prime Minister, HC 1393 Wednesday 18 July 2018 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 18 July 2018. Watch the meeting Members present: Dr Sarah Wollaston (Chair); Hilary Benn; Chris Bryant; Sir William Cash; Yvette Cooper; Mary Creagh; Lilian Greenwood; Sir Bernard Jenkin; Norman Lamb; Dr Julian Lewis; Angus Brendan MacNeil; Dr Andrew Murrison; Neil Parish; Tom Tugendhat. Questions 1-133 Witnesses I: Rt Hon Theresa May, Prime Minister. Written evidence from witnesses: – [Add names of witnesses and hyperlink to submissions] Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Rt Hon Theresa May, Prime Minister. Chair: Good afternoon, and thank you for coming. For those following from outside the room, we will cover Brexit to start with for the first hour, and then we will move on to the subjects of air quality, defence expenditure, the restoration and renewal programme here and, if we have time, health and social care. We will start the session with Hilary Benn, the Exiting the European Union Committee Chair. Q1 Hilary Benn: Good afternoon, Prime Minister. Given the events of the last two weeks, wouldn’t it strengthen your hand in the negotiations if you put the White Paper to a vote in the House of Commons? The Prime Minister: What is important is that we have set out the Government’s position and got through particularly important legislation in the House of Commons. Getting the European Union (Withdrawal) Act on the statute book was a very important step in the process of withdrawing from the European Union. We have published the White Paper, and we have begun discussing it at the EU level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2005 Playing Poohsticks with the British Constitution? The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor Susanna Frederick Fischer The Catholic University, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Susanna Frederick Fischer, Playing Poohsticks with the British Constitution? The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor, 24 PENN. ST. INT’L L. REV. 257 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I Articles I Playing Poohsticks with the British Constitution? The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor Susanna Frederick Fischer* ABSTRACT This paper critically assesses a recent and significant constitutional change to the British judicial system. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 swept away more than a thousand years of constitutional tradition by significantly reforming the ancient office of Lord Chancellor, which straddled all three branches of government. A stated goal of this legislation was to create more favorable external perceptions of the British constitutional and justice system. But even though the enacted legislation does substantively promote this goal, both by enhancing the separation of powers and implementing new statutory safeguards for * Susanna Frederick Fischer is an Assistant Professor at the Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America, in Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]